• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

Fight them, without becoming them!

It’s pointless to bring up problems that can only be solved with a time machine.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Ah, the different things are different argument.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

The rest of the comments were smacking Boebert like she was a piñata.

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”

Republicans: slavery is when you own me. freedom is when I own you.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

If you are still in the gop, you are either an extremist yourself, or in bed with those who are.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / HuffPo sale

HuffPo sale

by DougJ|  February 7, 201111:59 am| 87 Comments

This post is in: Our Failed Media Experiment

FacebookTweetEmail

At first, the amount of money AOL paid for HuffPo sounded insane to me but I guess it’s not:

The $315 million that AOL is paying for the Huffington Post is roughly 3X the valuation seen at its last capital raise two years ago, is 10X its 2010 revenues and is roughly 5X estimated forward 2011 revenues. Those are all big numbers, but not insanely so, for what is clearly a big strategic move on the part of AOL. After all, AOL has a market cap of $2.3 billion: right now it still dwarfs HuffPo. That might not be true in a few years’ time, if HuffPo continues growing at its current rate and AOL continues to lose subscribers and revenues.

My feeling, then, is that this deal is a good one for both sides. AOL gets something it desperately needs: a voice and a clear editorial vision. It’s smart, and bold, to put Arianna in charge of all AOL’s editorial content, since she is one of the precious few people who has managed to create a mass-market general-interest online publication which isn’t bland and which has an instantly identifiable personality. That’s a rare skill and one which AOL desperately needs to apply to its broad yet inchoate suite of websites.

I’m not a fan of Huffington Post but it’s amazing how successful it has been.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « With Friends Like These…
Next Post: And those ladies, they rolled their eyes »

Reader Interactions

87Comments

  1. 1.

    Elizabelle

    February 7, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    I don’t read the thing. Too messy an interface, and often too hysterical.

  2. 2.

    Uloborus

    February 7, 2011 at 12:03 pm

    Interesting. So whether or not she’s a shitty liberal, she’s a good carnival barker? If it’s a business and not political decision, that makes sense.

  3. 3.

    cervantes

    February 7, 2011 at 12:03 pm

    Will they still promote magical mystical mumbo jumbo, blame vaccines for autism, and tell people not to get cancer treatment because coffee enemas work much better? Or is all that shit too out there for a publicly traded corporation?

  4. 4.

    Steve M.

    February 7, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    It strikes me that it’s all about cred — about quieting the voices that say “BWAHAHAHAHA! AOL!” every time the company wants people to read its content. Best way to do that is to buy a site huge numbers of people already read.

  5. 5.

    Jim C.

    February 7, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    So, basically the Huff Post people are being handed $135M to keep doing what they’ve been doing with Arianna calling the shots as she has been?

    Wow. Good work if you can get it.

  6. 6.

    Elizabelle

    February 7, 2011 at 12:07 pm

    Jane Harman, Democrat of California, is resigning from the House.

    What?

    http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2011/02/07/us/AP-US-Congress-Harman-Resignation.html?_r=1&ref=us

  7. 7.

    mistermix

    February 7, 2011 at 12:08 pm

    Disagree with Felix.

    10x revenue makes sense if you’re banking on big growth and/or a business model can be exploited with more capital and/or the place is run by a genius.

    Where’s that growth coming from? HuffPo is a mature site – they’re not adding readers at any kind of serious clip, AFAIK.

    As for business model, it’s just “put ads on our site”. What’e great about that?

    As for genius – c’mon. Even if she is a genius, which she’s not, I have to believe that she’s out as soon as her contract runs out. She’ll have an excuse, I’m sure, but in the end she has no real interest in turning around D-level properties like MapQuest and Moviephone.

  8. 8.

    Pococurante

    February 7, 2011 at 12:09 pm

    All those spam emails promising I can make a decent living working out of my house? Worked for Arianna…

  9. 9.

    cleek

    February 7, 2011 at 12:10 pm

    @Elizabelle:
    my scandalsense is all a-tingle

  10. 10.

    mistermix

    February 7, 2011 at 12:10 pm

    @Steve M.: I agree with this. They paid a high valuation in hopes of “synergy”, which never happens. The 1+1 = 11 quote is just another way to say “synergy”.

  11. 11.

    Elizabelle

    February 7, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    U.S. Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice), a leading congressional voice on anti-terrorism issues, plans to resign from Congress to head up the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, a senior congressional source confirmed Monday, setting up a special election to choose her successor in a coastal district that stretches from Venice into the South Bay [Los Angeles area].

    http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-jane-harman-congress-20110207,0,2276609.story

  12. 12.

    Sentient Puddle

    February 7, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    After all, AOL has a market cap of $2.3 billion: right now it still dwarfs HuffPo. That might not be true in a few years’ time, if HuffPo continues growing at its current rate and AOL continues to lose subscribers and revenues.

    Yeah, but is it really reasonable to guess that HuffPo will (or even can) grow at its current rate? That strikes me as being a really risky bet to take.

  13. 13.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    February 7, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    Prolly will just wind up being a staid conservative takeover of an outlet that actually pushed liberal content.

  14. 14.

    DougJ®

    February 7, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    @Steve M.:

    That could be about right.

  15. 15.

    BGinCHI

    February 7, 2011 at 12:13 pm

    Countdown till Howard Fineman starts reporting on himself.

  16. 16.

    Scott P.

    February 7, 2011 at 12:14 pm

    Somebody said that AOL buying Huffington post will turn out like Time-Warner buying AOL.

  17. 17.

    Elizabelle

    February 7, 2011 at 12:14 pm

    @cleek:

    I know. I was wondering if it was health issues for herself or her husband. He’s 92.

    And just bought Newsweek last year. For a dollar.

  18. 18.

    Zarathustra

    February 7, 2011 at 12:14 pm

    The numbers look reasonable. If you are to look for insane valuation, that’s facebook.

    Also sprach Analyst

  19. 19.

    NobodySpecial

    February 7, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    Arianna mostly became successful at this because she had celebrity connections to help her at startup. Plus, I refuse to call her a lefty…all she is is a huckster who’s figured that there’s more free cash to be found on the left side of the aisle since Faux and Rush have tied up so much of the right.

  20. 20.

    Alex S.

    February 7, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    @Jim C.:

    Yeah, I don’t know what HuffPost is getting out of this, apart from the money.

  21. 21.

    Zifnab

    February 7, 2011 at 12:17 pm

    I’m not a fan of Huffington Post but it’s amazing how successful it has been.

    For a lot of people, it’s the only game in town. Say what you will about Huffington’s liberalism, but she’s managed to position herself as the “liberal Rush Limbaugh” with quite a bit of success.

    In an age where conservative voices are smeared across the entire spectrum of discourse, Arianna has placed herself among the handful of voices supporting a progressive view. I’m not surprised in the least that HuffPo has ballooned in popularity. Not when your other comparable options like Time, Newsweek, and USA Today have a more conservative bent.

  22. 22.

    Observer

    February 7, 2011 at 12:20 pm

    Paying 10X revenue for a tech company is generally a bad deal for the buyer. Way about industry norms.

    The fact that Felix Salmon needs to talk about future revenues to make it sound like AOL is paying 5X is telling.

    Good for Ms Huffington, almost 90% probability bad for AOL.
    Probably bad for HuffPo readers too, but time will tell.

  23. 23.

    Ahasuerus

    February 7, 2011 at 12:22 pm

    @Elizabelle: You beat me to it; I was going to suggest health issues. But if that were the case you would expect the new job to be much closer to home than the old job. ‘Tis a puzzlement.

  24. 24.

    Karmakin

    February 7, 2011 at 12:23 pm

    @mistermix: I’m usually a cynic on these things, but to be honest I think a 10x revenue/price (And I’m assuming that their costs are relatively low) is actually a good investment in this day and age, where AFAIK the revenue/price or profit/price (depending on how you want to look at it, I honestly prefer the latter) ratios are usually MUCH worse.

  25. 25.

    MaximusNYC

    February 7, 2011 at 12:24 pm

    As mediocre as HuffPo’s content is, it’s probably an order of magnitude better than most of what AOL is currently cranking out.

    My sense is that AOL’s recent content-centric strategy has failed to get traction mostly because the company is run by an ad-sales guy, who doesn’t actually know how to create decent content.

    He’s trying to buy the expertise he lacks. This merged entity still has zero appeal to me, but never underestimate the market for mediocrity.

  26. 26.

    Culture of Truth

    February 7, 2011 at 12:24 pm

    I remember when Arianna said she was starting a web site. I scoffed and I was wrong. About it’s undeniable success, anyway.

  27. 27.

    jsfox

    February 7, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    A question that isn’t being asked. With a purchase price of $350 million does this blow up the model of HuffPo not paying for content. Do the bloggers who post their now for free in exchange for exposure suddenly go WTF!

  28. 28.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 7, 2011 at 12:26 pm

    You might want to check out the comments on Huffington’s “look at me” blog post about the merger. The “base” is *not* happy, and if the base isn’t happy, I don’t know where all that traffic is going to come from.

    A web site – even BJ – is only as strong from an advertising perspective as its user engagement. If this merger drives away the thousands of commenters, it will be a bad one. I don’t know that Salmon gets that.

  29. 29.

    /dev/null

    February 7, 2011 at 12:26 pm

    My biggest issue with HuffPo is its continuing support of junk science like homeopathy in their health section.

    edit: which has little to do with the subject at hand. just annoys me every time I think of it.

  30. 30.

    Amanda in the South Bay

    February 7, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    It seems like a bunch of business mumbo jumbo to justify a ridiculously large amount of money to be paid for a pile of steaming shit.

  31. 31.

    BGinCHI

    February 7, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts: I thought this site was strong because of Tunch.

  32. 32.

    Face

    February 7, 2011 at 12:28 pm

    OT:
    Why do I sense this is Lucy holding the football, begging Chuck to kick it?

  33. 33.

    Southern Beale

    February 7, 2011 at 12:29 pm

    Apparently Arianna is going to be in charge of all AOL’s editorial content now? Something like that? Wingnut headzapoppin’ methinks.

    I wish she’d funnel some of that $315 million into supporting some kind of liberal talk radio … one station, in one market that’s not San Francisco or New York City, just one. C’mon, try Nashville, we’re a liberal city in a Red State. Give us a big signal. Not everyone goes online, we gotta reach people somehow. There is NO liberal talk across vast reaches of America unless you subscribe to Sirius/XM.

  34. 34.

    sukabi

    February 7, 2011 at 12:29 pm

    great deal for Arianna… since most of her “writers” are unpaid and that probably won’t change under the new deal… look for writers to start jumping ship… it’s one thing to work for free for a relatively small company that’s just “getting it’s legs” and you can align with politically… but to do the same for a multi-billion dollar company… don’t see that happening.

    at any rate, over the last 2 years the HuffPost has gotten more and more unreadable — unless you like sensational headlines that are divorced from the anemic stories they’re linked to… oh and celebrity gossip.

  35. 35.

    mistermix

    February 7, 2011 at 12:29 pm

    @Karmakin: Cite a few comps if you think 10X is a good deal.

    But, let’s say for the sake of argument that it is a good deal. If the HuffPo acquisition is such an awesome deal that it was going to turn AOL’s media story around, why was it a 95% cash deal? Why didn’t Arianna and her investors want to get a piece of that sweet, sweet AOL pie – even a modest 20%? The reason is obvious – it’s a shitty deal for AOL and it won’t do a damn thing to turn that place around.

  36. 36.

    Loneoak

    February 7, 2011 at 12:29 pm

    The obvious problem is that anyone with an AOL email address likely thinks Obama is Malcolm X’s illegitimate son, born simultaneously in Canada and Kenya, which really are the same place anyway when you think about it.

  37. 37.

    Jager

    February 7, 2011 at 12:30 pm

    @Zifnab:

    A geek pal of mine said the links are the reason the traffic is so high on Huff Po. Its a site people go to, to go somewhere else. They return and repeat the process. The value is set by the traffic. Can they drive more traffic, who knows?

  38. 38.

    BGinCHI

    February 7, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    The headline on this story really ought to be:

    AOL Buys Online Media Site Where Almost Everyone Works For Free

    (Wall St gets wood every time they hear about such sweet exploitation)

  39. 39.

    sukabi

    February 7, 2011 at 12:33 pm

    @Amanda in the South Bay: unless the AOL management / culture has changed over the last couple of years this is what they do… pay huge amounts of $$$ for steaming piles…. or pay huge $$$ and turn that investment into a huge steaming pile … think AOL – Time/Warner merger…

  40. 40.

    aimai

    February 7, 2011 at 12:34 pm

    @Sentient Puddle:

    I agree with Sentient Puddle, the notion that a media organization like HuffPo can keep growing exponentially when they neither own any new technology nor make much new content is absurd.

    However, it is a remarkable achievement. Just befor the 2008 election I was giving a lecture on the internet to a bunch of senior citizens who were avid but untutored users. Two older guys, life long conservatives, approached me to talk politics afterwards and both of them were starting to list democratic *as a result of reading HuffPo*. I was really surprised because to me it still seemed a sort of out of the way place to go for information. But they were turning to it.

    aimai

  41. 41.

    Zifnab

    February 7, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    @Jager:

    Its a site people go to, to go somewhere else. They return and repeat the process.

    Sounds like Google. :-p They’ve done fairly well.

  42. 42.

    Sly

    February 7, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    @/dev/null:

    My biggest issue with HuffPo is its continuing support of junk science like homeopathy in their health section.

    HuffPo’s penchant for diluting something until its worthless is applicable to more than just its health section.

  43. 43.

    Loneoak

    February 7, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    @/dev/null:

    Agreed. But it is based in LA, where former porn stars know more about health than doctors.

  44. 44.

    Maude

    February 7, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    @sukabi:
    The word vapid comes to mind. The pretense that it’s not a junk site is silly. I haven’t read it in years.

  45. 45.

    Ana Gama

    February 7, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    About the only decent content at Huff Post is written by Sam Stein and Ryan Grim. Otherwise…pffft.

  46. 46.

    /dev/null

    February 7, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    @Sly, @Loneoak.

    +1 each.

  47. 47.

    Malron

    February 7, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    Huffington Post, the great internet empire that brought us the immortal Mayhill (rednecks cling to their guns and religion) Fowler. My guess is FluffPost will lurch even further to the right now that AOL is bankrolling them.

    And, uh, meh on this bullshit:

    It’s smart, and bold, to put Arianna in charge of all AOL’s editorial content, since she is one of the precious few people who has managed to create a mass-market general-interest online publication which isn’t bland and which has an instantly identifiable personality.

    cough cough(Drudge Report)cough

    Incidentally, exactly what have rednecks/Tea Partiers/right wing religious whackjobs/conservatives been doing since Obama was elected?

    Clinging to their guns and their religion.

  48. 48.

    BGinCHI

    February 7, 2011 at 12:40 pm

    @Ana Gama: Jason Linkins too.

  49. 49.

    sukabi

    February 7, 2011 at 12:42 pm

    @Maude: what’s so telling about “our betters” in DC is that the supposed Democrats go to the HuffPost for their “news” and the Repubs go to Drudge… WTF is up with that??? leaves me to believe that there are NO functioning brains among them.

  50. 50.

    retr2327

    February 7, 2011 at 12:44 pm

    “AOL Buys Online Media Site Where Almost Everyone Works For Free” & by and large, you get what you pay for.

    Count me among the skeptics. It’s 90% a waste of time and space (and yes, they’re still giving space to Jenny McCarthy to spout horse__t about autism even after the Brits found evidence of deliberate fraud in the critical study’s results). And the one thing I remember from my information theory course is that as the error rate approaches 50%, the value of the information approaches zero. That strikes me as more likely to prove true here than any 1 + 1 = 11 nonsense.

  51. 51.

    JGabriel

    February 7, 2011 at 12:44 pm

    @BGinCHI: And Dan Froomkin.

    .

  52. 52.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 7, 2011 at 12:46 pm

    @BGinCHI: It’s strong because of the Cult of Tunch.

  53. 53.

    Ailuridae

    February 7, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    @BGinCHI:

    They posts some decent statistically based sports stuff too.

  54. 54.

    BGinCHI

    February 7, 2011 at 12:49 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts: The judges will accept that answer.

  55. 55.

    WyldPirate

    February 7, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    @sukabi:

    at any rate, over the last 2 years the HuffPost has gotten more and more unreadable—unless you like sensational headlines that are divorced from the anemic stories they’re linked to… oh and celebrity gossip.

    What? “sensational headlines”, unreadable bullshit gossip and the like are the favored reading material of real Amerikkans (TM). Just look at any grocery store checkout lane next time you buy groceries.

    And Ariana Huffington? She’s been a grifter forever. A “liberal” version of Sarah Palin who thrived sniffing other people’s problems and commenting on them like someone that sniffs soiled underwear. I despise her worse than Sarah Palin.

  56. 56.

    Emerald

    February 7, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    @NobodySpecial:

    I refuse to call her a lefty…all she is is a huckster who’s figured that there’s more free cash to be found on the left side of the aisle since Faux and Rush have tied up so much of the right.

    Bingo, although I think it’s more sinister. Yeah, she’s after the $$$, but I believe that Arianna always was and is now a Republican. She’s done nothing but tear down Obama from day one. She calls herself a liberal, puts some liberal commentary up there, and then uses that platform to chip away at the Democrats from the “inside,” as it were.

    Never forget that Andrew Breitbart helped to design that site. She still vacations with Gingrich. She was with Darryl Issa in Vegas on the day of the Tucson shootings.

    Bloody double agent.

  57. 57.

    WyldPirate

    February 7, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    @Amanda in the South Bay:

    It seems like a bunch of business mumbo jumbo to justify a ridiculously large amount of money to be paid for a pile of steaming shit.

    Careful, now. You’re getting close to describing the entirity of American capitalism in the 21st century.

  58. 58.

    John Cole

    February 7, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    I like Stein and Froomkin, but really, the HuffPo is just impossible to read.

    And hell, let’s face it. The Superficial and Double Viking are better.

  59. 59.

    JGabriel

    February 7, 2011 at 1:03 pm

    @WyldPirate:

    What? “sensational headlines”, unreadable bullshit gossip and the like are the favored reading material of real Amerikkans™.

    How much of Arianna’s audience comes from the US? I suspect HuffPo gets a decent amount (not majority, but not negligible) of its traffic from the rest of the English speaking world (Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Ireland, Belize, et.al.)

    This may be one of those instances where it’s a little parochial to blame the frothy content mix of sensation, gossip, and bad health advice strictly on the “Amerikkans™”

    .

  60. 60.

    KG

    February 7, 2011 at 1:08 pm

    @Elizabelle: the line at the end about being able to do more from the outside than the inside reminded me a bit of Palin’s resignation speech. It’s not like we have competitive seats here in California, so it’s not going to change the make up of the House.

  61. 61.

    Dave

    February 7, 2011 at 1:08 pm

    When I read “This is a case of 1+1=11,” all these alarm bells started sounding and red lights started blinking. The red lights spelled “TOM FRIEDMAN.”

  62. 62.

    Yutsano

    February 7, 2011 at 1:15 pm

    If I just say I don’t bloody care does that make me a bad human?

  63. 63.

    Phil Perspective

    February 7, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    @Scott P.: I thought AOL actually bought out Time Warner.

  64. 64.

    Judas Escargot

    February 7, 2011 at 1:21 pm

    @Dave:

    Well, you can’t say ‘synergize!’ with a straight face anymore. Maybe 1+1 is the best they could come up with.

  65. 65.

    catclub

    February 7, 2011 at 1:22 pm

    @Maude: “The pretense that it’s not a junk site is silly. I haven’t read it in years.”

    Or as Yogi Berra put it: Nobody goes there any more, it’s too crowded.

  66. 66.

    catclub

    February 7, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    @John Cole: “The Superficial and Double Viking are better. ”
    Those sound like ‘a Brazilian.’
    Are they related?

  67. 67.

    WyldPirate

    February 7, 2011 at 1:26 pm

    @JGabriel:

    This may be one of those instances where it’s a little parochial to blame the frothy content mix of sensation, gossip, and bad health advice strictly on the “Amerikkans™”

    Can’t argue with this. I didn’t really intend to imply that Amerikkkans(TM) were the sole “consumers” of HuffPo’s particularly noxious brand of horseshit.

    There are plenty of people the world over who love to gawk at the misfortunes of others and revel in reading celebrity-related news. HuffPo found a niche and filled it.

  68. 68.

    The Dangerman

    February 7, 2011 at 1:26 pm

    At first, the amount of money AOL paid for HuffPo sounded insane…

    Go with your gut; it’s insane. Reminds me of that card company (Blue Mountain Arts?) that was sold for 800 gazillion back in the day. It’s a joke.

  69. 69.

    giltay

    February 7, 2011 at 1:35 pm

    I suspect the people who write “user-generated content” of any quality will abandon ship. (I don’t know if there is any; I don’t read HuffPo.) AOL is a big enough company to make it to the “MAKE IT RAIN, BITCHES” endpoint of the Should I Work for Free Flowchart.

    So, you’re left with the people who write to get exposure, i.e. the slush pile.

  70. 70.

    Ed in NJ

    February 7, 2011 at 1:37 pm

    As someone who has kept an AOL email address for years even after it went free (mostly for family members and to use as a spam folder), I am subjected to the content they push towards their members. It’s a bunch of gossip and dumbed-down conservative talking points aimed at the old users who were too stupid to get off AOL.

    So I see this as a good thing in Huffington is going to start controlling the editorial content at AOL. It can’t be any worse than the crap that’s on there now. I would bet that conservatives are up in arms over this.

  71. 71.

    Pongo

    February 7, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    I can’t even read Huffpo any more, with their pseudo-science, homeopathy, anti-vaccine BS. Oprah and Arianna have done more to set back medical science in the past decade than any number of corrupt pharma companies. They can proudly claim at least partial responsibility for the deadly, totally preventable, whooping cough and measles outbreaks we’ve been subjected to by perpetuating the fraud of Andrew Wakefield and the ignorance of Jenny McCarthy. Providing a forum for idiocy and treating dangerous notions as falsely equivalent to biological facts makes them liable for the consequences–including the unnecessary deaths of innocent infants from diseases we had essentially eradicated decades ago.

    I used to enjoy the political coverage of the Huffpo, but eventually had to wonder if their political coverage was as shoddy and fact-free as their medical stuff is. IMO, there are far better options for political analysis on the left (TPM, 538 and Balloon Juice, for example) that don’t require suspension of the activity of the little grey cells to be believed.

    Did I mention that I’m not a fan?

  72. 72.

    zonk3

    February 7, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    I responded to this critically, though tactfully, as it broke on HuffPost and all but one of my comments were deleted by moderators. Fuck ’em. They sold out when they brought on that guy who hated bloggers, Howie Fineman.

  73. 73.

    Brachiator

    February 7, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    My feeling, then, is that this deal is a good one for both sides. AOL gets something it desperately needs: a voice and a clear editorial vision.

    It’s like a rescue boat hitting another iceberg after picking up survivors. AOL was going down the tubes, and the HuffPo pretends to be journalism, an alternative to journalism, or something. Arianna Huffington now takes control over AOL editorial products, applying her vast lack of journalism experience to manage something.

    Oh, well. This is just as creaky as Rupert Murdoch’s iPad Daily, a honking pile of flaming manure.

  74. 74.

    Amanda in the South Bay

    February 7, 2011 at 2:00 pm

    I also feel like Felix Salmon…knows some things very well (the economy) but in other fields…he’s either totally naive, totally out of his depth, or some combo.

  75. 75.

    Judas Escargot

    February 7, 2011 at 2:28 pm

    @Ed in NJ:

    So I see this as a good thing in Huffington is going to start controlling the editorial content at AOL. It can’t be any worse than the crap that’s on there now. I would bet that conservatives are up in arms over this.

    I didn’t think of this angle at all.

    That said… are hoardes of stupid, uninformed liberals guaranteed to be less damaging than the hoardes of stupid, uninformed conservatives AOL has now?

    If the answer is ‘yes’ then they should buy yahoo’s discussion boards while they’re at it.

    EDIT: double negatives. Benna-Drill (FYWP). Bad mix.

  76. 76.

    Pangloss

    February 7, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    Celebrity news is a cash cow.

  77. 77.

    matt

    February 7, 2011 at 3:28 pm

    Where’s the slide show where I can rank what I think of this sale?

  78. 78.

    liberal

    February 7, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    @Observer:

    Good for Ms Huffington, almost 90% probability bad for AOL.

    Heh. Now what merger from the past does that remind you of, with the tables turned?

  79. 79.

    Jennyjinx

    February 7, 2011 at 3:45 pm

    I haven’t read all the comments, so excuse me if this was already asked.

    Why is it surprising? She had capital to create the site and her connections brought her a lot media attention straight out of the gate. She had a head start before she even went live. Even after she was busted for impersonating George Clooney (by cutting and pasting his offsite quote to create a “blog post” onto which she put his byline without his permission) she was still able to maintain some kind of “authority” as the voice of the left. She pays almost nothing (if anything) to contributors, has been busted scraping Twitter for content, and is notorious for her use of sensational headlines just to grab attention.

    Shoot, I’d have been more surprised if she wouldn’t have been able to make a good profit off of it.

    Meh.

  80. 80.

    catclub

    February 7, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    @Brachiator: “This is just as creaky as Rupert Murdoch’s iPad Daily, a honking pile of flaming manure. ”

    Don’t most of Murdoch’s large ventures make money? Or is the honking pile of manure description no bar to also making honking piles of cash.

    Note I said large ventures. I know there are various small ones that are pure vanity. Kind of like all the small unprofitable pieces of Microsoft that are paid for by Windows and Office.

  81. 81.

    liberal

    February 7, 2011 at 5:00 pm

    @catclub:

    Don’t most of Murdoch’s large ventures make money?

    I thought many of them don’t, but could be wrong about that.

  82. 82.

    agrippa

    February 7, 2011 at 5:25 pm

    I do not much care for A H. I have doubts about how ‘liberal’ she liberal she is. And, I do not much care for her sniping at Obama. HuffPo is not a good source for news and analysis.

  83. 83.

    frankdawg

    February 7, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    If that lame shit hole is worth $315M there must be porn sites worth $315Trillion. Really $315 for Jenny McCarthy, watered down “People” occasional intelligent commentary.

    It is a sick, sad, world.

  84. 84.

    sukabi

    February 7, 2011 at 5:41 pm

    @frankdawg: but it’s THE place to go to read about the latest “celebrity” fart, yawn, or belch…

    yeah, it’s pretty worthless.

  85. 85.

    CaliCat

    February 7, 2011 at 7:56 pm

    I think Arianna Huffington is the biggest con artist in media history. And she just pulled off the biggest swindle in the history of liberal America. AH, Breitbart and Newt are laughing their asses off right now.

  86. 86.

    maus

    February 7, 2011 at 7:58 pm

    God, I hope the whole AOL empire collapses upon itself,taking HuffPo and Huffington herself with it.

    I loathe insincere faux-Liberals so very much. She’s like the fratboys who lie about politics to get laid, only she wants to get into the right parties and have adoration laid upon her. She’s a sleazy opportunist, as evidenced by her granting paid columns to dangerous anti-vaxers and other pseudoscientists.

  87. 87.

    Janus Daniels

    February 7, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    Yes, HP posts crap; I don’t read that. HP provides a centrist news and opinion dump in the middle of overwhelmingly right wing media. You can easily find good articles by people who wrote something insufficiently Republican to get published elsewhere. They think, “I wrote it, corporate won’t print it, much less pay me, it’s topical, it’s value can only decline with time, stick it on PuffHo,” and done. However much it may suck, it’s their best move. It’s a better move than they or we had before 2005. HP performs a service for them and us. (AOL overpaid, but the last time AOL did anything smart was… TimeWarner? and they fumbled it.)

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Miss Bianca on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Apr 17, 2024 @ 10:52am)
  • lowtechcyclist on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 10:52am)
  • WaterGirl on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 10:51am)
  • Ksmiami on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 10:50am)
  • TBone on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 10:49am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!