• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

DeSantis transforming Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

Disagreements are healthy; personal attacks are not.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

This chaos was totally avoidable.

The willow is too close to the house.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Sometimes the world just tells you your cat is here.

Republicans in disarray!

Not all heroes wear capes.

Shut up, hissy kitty!

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

We are aware of all internet traditions.

The words do not have to be perfect.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

The unpunished coup was a training exercise.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Tide comes in. Tide goes out. You can’t explain that.

Text STOP to opt out of updates on war plans.

A norm that restrains only one side really is not a norm – it is a trap.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Civil Rights / LGBTQ Rights / Gay Rights are Human Rights / Another Winner for the GOP

Another Winner for the GOP

by @heymistermix.com|  February 9, 20119:54 am| 61 Comments

This post is in: Gay Rights are Human Rights, Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

On the ground in Real America:

Some 83 percent of Kentuckians say gay people should be protected from discrimination in the workplace, in housing and in public places such as restaurants, according to a survey released Monday by the statewide Fairness Coalition. That is an increase of 18 percentage points since 2004, when a similar survey was conducted.

Yet, when Sarah Palin™ tweeted or burped or farted that she’s (edit) not attending CPAC but apparently unwilling to denounce GOPProud [R-teh ghey], who are attending, she gets this:

Palin’s comments didn’t exactly go down well with the American Principles Project, one of the group leading the GOProud/CPAC boycott. In a statement yesterday, APP president Frank Cannon called on Palin to explain her remark. “The concern of conservatives is over the participation of a group whose stated goals run at odds with that of core conservative principles, not over debate over those issues,” Cannon said. […]

Those “core conservative principles” are polling at 17% in Kentucky, so I hope Cannon can convince Palin™ that they’re worth defending to the bitter end.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « A Bit More Open Thread…with a bonus science communication tutorial.
Next Post: I’m Not as Hopeful »

Reader Interactions

61Comments

  1. 1.

    c u n d gulag

    February 9, 2011 at 10:01 am

    “Those “core conservative principles” are polling at 17% in Kentucky…”

    In KY?
    Really?
    Then how the f**k did that ultra-‘moran’ Rand end up winning?

  2. 2.

    Villago Delenda Est

    February 9, 2011 at 10:02 am

    “Core conservative principles” = The ghey is icky!

  3. 3.

    Zifnab

    February 9, 2011 at 10:04 am

    Those “core conservative principles” are polling at 17% in Kentucky, so I hope Cannon can convince Palin™ that they’re worth defending to the bitter end.

    It’s 83% now. Wait till a bill hits the floor and the Wingnut Whirlyzer spins into high gear. By the time the “Fair Access Act of 20XX” goes up for a vote, it’ll be smeared as the “Butch Gay Prostitute Raping Your 16 Year Old Son Act” and support will bottom out.

    See: Health care, immigration reform, tax legislation, etc, etc, etc.

    It’s a silly game, asking what people believe before the GOP has had a chance to pretzel the issue beyond recognition.

  4. 4.

    amk

    February 9, 2011 at 10:05 am

    core conservative principle = let me get it on with as many women as possible, screw my wife.

  5. 5.

    Bulworth

    February 9, 2011 at 10:06 am

    I thought Palin was opting out of the CPAC event thing because of teh gay.

  6. 6.

    Ash Can

    February 9, 2011 at 10:09 am

    And how many GOP politicians will loudly proclaim that objecting to discrimination against gays makes one an extreme radical left-winger who’s far outside of the mainstream of American values?

  7. 7.

    General Stuck

    February 9, 2011 at 10:09 am

    Say what you will, but there are fresh storms brewing on planet wingnut. And in other places, a bit of human sunshine could be peaking out through the dark clouds. Stay tuned

  8. 8.

    Dan

    February 9, 2011 at 10:10 am

    Palin is a fraud and a fool, but I don’t think she’s a homophobe. Or at least she’s savy enough to realize this is a losing issue for the GOP.

  9. 9.

    Brian S (formerly Incertus)

    February 9, 2011 at 10:10 am

    @c u n d gulag: Rand won because while 83% might support it in the abstract, it’s not a dealbreaker of an issue for them. Paul can hate on the gays as long as he comes through on the other stuff like, well, whatever he’s supposed to come through on.

  10. 10.

    Napoleon

    February 9, 2011 at 10:11 am

    @amk:

    I think Michelle B is – you may be confusing the two.

  11. 11.

    A Commenter at Balloon Juice (formerlyThe Grand Panjandrum)

    February 9, 2011 at 10:12 am

    I’m sure racial equality polls about the same. See how that changes when they ask if they would let your daughter date outside her race.

  12. 12.

    A Farmer

    February 9, 2011 at 10:17 am

    Opposition to teh gay is still pretty high in Western Ohio, so far as I can tell, except when it comes to when people know family members or high school friends who are gay. If a church is willing to go easy on teh gay, then it’s time to drop the pastor or switch churches. One local church dropped out of the UCC because of them going soft, another is splitting because a sizable portion of the church couldn’t handle the ECLA allowing practicing gays to be pastors.

  13. 13.

    NobodySpecial

    February 9, 2011 at 10:25 am

    Palin will go, because she needs the cameras and the media attention. Conservative ‘principles’ be damned, grifters gotta grift.

  14. 14.

    Violet

    February 9, 2011 at 10:26 am

    @Zifnab:
    Yep, exactly. According to talk radio gays and lesbians are already protected because “they’re protected if they’re black, if they’re women, etc. They don’t need special protection.” That’s the kind of argument that works very well in places with people who think gays are icky and who don’t want to have any gay people near them, but also don’t want to be accused of being discriminatory.

  15. 15.

    geg6

    February 9, 2011 at 10:28 am

    @General Stuck:

    We don’t often agree, but on this, I think you may be right. Lotsa cracks showing in the usual rock hard GOPer edifice these days. And there are signs of major buyers’ remorse going on among the indies.

    That said, I’m anxiously awaiting La Palin’s candidacy announcement. I think she HAS to do it, for ego and, of course, monetary reasons. I plan to donate the minute she announces.

  16. 16.

    Ash Can

    February 9, 2011 at 10:32 am

    @geg6: I can certainly understand why you’d want to contribute, but I’m breaking out in hives just thinking about the mailing lists that would land you on.

  17. 17.

    Sko Hayes

    February 9, 2011 at 10:34 am

    Sarah is not attending CPAC.

    Well, I’ve never attended a CPAC conference ever so I was a little taken aback this go around when I couldn’t make it to this one either and then there was a speculation well I either agree or disagree with some of the groups or issues that CPAC is discussing. It really is a matter of time for me.

  18. 18.

    cathyx

    February 9, 2011 at 10:35 am

    I would like to read the questions that were asked in the survey. I find it hard to believe that 83% support discrimination protection. Sometimes the conclusions drawn are not exactly what they should be.

  19. 19.

    geg6

    February 9, 2011 at 10:39 am

    @Ash Can:

    Meh, I can deal. I get the Chamber’s newsletter and a couple of other conservative things like that just to see what they are up to.

  20. 20.

    Roger Moore

    February 9, 2011 at 10:39 am

    @Zifnab:
    This. My prediction: Republicans will say that the law makes it illegal to say no when a gay propositions you. It’s a win/win for Republican legislators. If the law fails, they’ve gotten their way. If it passes, they have a built in excuse for the next time they’re caught in a gay tryst.

  21. 21.

    Kryptik

    February 9, 2011 at 10:40 am

    Somehow, I think this is a nonstarter.

    Predominantly, Americans seem to ALWAYS prefer the more socially liberal option when polled on one thing…until an ideological label or bill or resolution is attached to it. Then all of a sudden about 30% who agreed whole heartedly attack it as the height of librul fascism.

    This is how Paul got elected. People love freedom and equality until it’s proposed by a hippie.

  22. 22.

    Paul in KY

    February 9, 2011 at 10:41 am

    @Brian S (formerly Incertus): Also, Mr. Conway’s campaign made some bad moves near end of campaign that (IMO) sealed the loss for him.

    If was ever going to win, it would have been 50.5 – 49.5 or something like that.

  23. 23.

    c u n d gulag

    February 9, 2011 at 10:42 am

    @Brian S (formerly Incertus):
    And what the ‘frack’ is that supposed to be?
    Oh, never mind, I think I just answered my own question!

  24. 24.

    Ash Can

    February 9, 2011 at 10:44 am

    @Sko Hayes: Crimeny. If that broad ever said anything that I was actually able to understand, I’d faint dead away.

  25. 25.

    PurpleGirl

    February 9, 2011 at 10:47 am

    @NobodySpecial: Don’t forget the speaking fee. She doesn’t do these events for free, you know.

    ETA: Point about speaking fee still stands even if she isn’t doing CPAC. She’s gotta get paid for her speaking events. I wonder if they just don’t pay enough to suit her.

  26. 26.

    4tehlulz

    February 9, 2011 at 10:47 am

    “Some 83 percent of Kentuckians say gay people should be protected from discrimination in the workplace” but of those, only 15% bother to vote.

  27. 27.

    Stefan

    February 9, 2011 at 10:48 am

    Well, I’ve never attended a CPAC conference ever so I was a little taken aback this go around when I couldn’t make it to this one either and then there was a speculation well I either agree or disagree with some of the groups or issues that CPAC is discussing. It really is a matter of time for me.

    As usual with Don’t Cry for Me Alaska, I read this five times, still have no idea what it says. I mean, “was a speculation well I either agree or disagree with some of the groups or issues that CPAC is discussing. It really is a matter of time for me.” — that’s just a masterpiece of meaningless obfuscation.

  28. 28.

    Stillwater

    February 9, 2011 at 10:50 am

    @A Farmer: another is splitting because a sizable portion of the church couldn’t handle the ECLA allowing practicing gays to be pastors.

    Actually, I sorta agree with this. Only experienced, expert gays should be allowed to be Pastors.

  29. 29.

    Pococurante

    February 9, 2011 at 10:52 am

    That 17% sends her money, buys her books, watches her TV, and upholds her as one of them.

    The 83% does not.

    Basic MKTG 101.

  30. 30.

    Comrade Dread

    February 9, 2011 at 10:52 am

    “The concern of conservatives is over the participation of a group whose stated goals run at odds with that of core conservative principles, not over debate over those issues,” Cannon said. […]

    So they’re against more tax cuts for the rich and gutting environmental, ethical, and preventative regulations for businesses?

    Ah, okay, so they want to use their right to pursue happiness in ways that some folks don’t agree with. Well, I can certainly see why the GOP would be upset about that.

  31. 31.

    Stefan

    February 9, 2011 at 10:52 am

    Predominantly, Americans seem to ALWAYS prefer the more socially liberal option when polled on one thing…until an ideological label or bill or resolution is attached to it. Then all of a sudden about 30% who agreed whole heartedly attack it as the height of librul fascism.

    This is why when polls ask people about broad ideological orientation, about 20% of Americans identify themselves as liberal versus 40% as conservative, leading to the impression that this is, as repeated ad nauseum, a “center-right nation.” However, when you poll people about their stands on individual issues (minumum wage, workplace protections, equal rights, civil liberties, etc.) the positions suddenly switch and far more voters favor the more liberal position.

    It’s really all about labels to most people.

  32. 32.

    Violet

    February 9, 2011 at 10:53 am

    Ha ha ha ha ha. Fox must be getting desperate for ratings or something.

    During a report on Bristol Palin’s statement that she wouldn’t “rule out” a future political run, the following chyron aired on the February 9 edition of Fox News’ Fox & Friends:

    I wonder if they could go around and interview other random 20 year olds and ask them if they’ll “rule out” a run for President.

  33. 33.

    asiangrrlMN

    February 9, 2011 at 10:58 am

    @Stefan: Scarily enough, I actually understood that. “…and then there was a speculation well…” should be “…and then there was a speculation whether…”. She said she’s never gone, so there’s no reason to question why she’s not going this year. Like the woman said, it’s just a question of monies timing.

  34. 34.

    New Yorker

    February 9, 2011 at 10:59 am

    This post forgot the “I can’t believe we’re losing to these people” tag.

    Also too:

    @Violet:

    Jimmy McMillan also hasn’t ruled out a future political run. “President McMillan” has a nice ring to it….

  35. 35.

    A Farmer

    February 9, 2011 at 11:00 am

    @Stillwater:I think Catholic church protocol is to train them as alter boys, then send them to seminary to practice. After 5 years, they are ready to run a church.

  36. 36.

    RalfW

    February 9, 2011 at 11:03 am

    This is what is insane about American politics right now: “Palin hasn’t commented on the issue publicly since the tweet. Her only other comment on the issue was last February”

    Why on earth is anyone giving her even 5 seconds of attention? She “retweated” a comment, and that’s all the tea leaves we’re supposed to interpret?

    If this trademarked woman won’t actually field legit pres inquiries, then she is to be ignored, utterly and immediately.

  37. 37.

    EconWatcher

    February 9, 2011 at 11:03 am

    This will be the first (and probably last) time I ever have anything positive to say about Palin, but I have to go with Dan: Stoking bigotry does not seem to be particularly her thing.

    Sure, you could read things into her talk about “real Americans,” but I think that’s really just a shot against liberals and “elites” (you know, people who can read and write above an 8th grade level). I’d offer the same very limited praise of our most recent past president.

  38. 38.

    Ash Can

    February 9, 2011 at 11:04 am

    @Violet: If the Fox studios were ever to have their water supply spiked with lithium, Fox would turn into MSNBC.

  39. 39.

    Ash Can

    February 9, 2011 at 11:05 am

    @EconWatcher:

    Stoking bigotry does not seem to be particularly her thing.

    Except on the campaign trail.

  40. 40.

    Sly

    February 9, 2011 at 11:09 am

    Very few people actually like bullies.

    It’s very hard to argue that someone who fires an employee for being gay, or a hospital administrator who prevents a gay person from seeing their loved one on the latter’s death bed, is not being a bully.

    So I chalk these survey results to a dislike of bullies more than acceptance of gays.

  41. 41.

    EconWatcher

    February 9, 2011 at 11:12 am

    Ash Can: do you have an example? I don’t mean that in a snarky way; maybe I’m not remembering. But, for example, I think she didn’t do the “Barack Hussein” thing during the campaign (it became news when apparently she did it once late last year).http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/23/palin-calls-obama-barack-hussein/

    Don’t get me wrong, I agree she’s gratuitously nasty and has lowered the level of discourse. But I don’t recall a lot of stoking of bigotry.

  42. 42.

    4tehlulz

    February 9, 2011 at 11:12 am

    Stoking bigotry does not seem to be particularly her thing.

    She doesn’t need to stoke what’s already burning.

  43. 43.

    Villago Delenda Est

    February 9, 2011 at 11:13 am

    @NobodySpecial:

    Yup, that’s pretty much the deal.

    Sarah would wither and die if she’s removed for any substantial period of time from klieg light exposure.

  44. 44.

    Bubblegum Tate

    February 9, 2011 at 11:13 am

    @NobodySpecial:

    grifters gotta grift.

    I like this as Palin’s motto. Somebody needs to make a version of the haters gonna hate gif with Palin thinking “grifters gotta grift.”

  45. 45.

    Violet

    February 9, 2011 at 11:17 am

    @Bubblegum Tate:
    Didn’t B-J have a logo contest for something back in the day? Perhaps that should be revisited for this one.

    ETA: Ah yes, the United Pastry Jihad: https://balloon-juice.com/2009/01/24/pick-the-logo/

  46. 46.

    Zifnab

    February 9, 2011 at 11:26 am

    Somewhat OT, but Kos is reporting that the Republicans have forgotten how to whip votes.
    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2011/2/9/942276/-House-GOP-has-the-wheels-come-off…-on-Day-12

    Patriot Act fail.
    TAA Extension fail.

    This should be an amusing process going forward. Seems like the Tea Party Revolt is kicking into gear. That, or Boehner has absolutely no idea how to operate a majority party.

  47. 47.

    Ash Can

    February 9, 2011 at 11:28 am

    @EconWatcher: To be honest, I don’t recall anything completely overt, but the stuff about Obama being an outsider, not one of us, etc., along with her utter lack of negative reaction to the racial/violent things the crowds shouted didn’t exactly equate to non-bigotry for me. I should emphasize that I’m not looking to argue; it’s just that as soon as I read your sentence the first thing that came to mind were the scenes at her speeches. It seemed like there was an awful lot of dogwhistling going on at the time.

  48. 48.

    Punchy

    February 9, 2011 at 11:28 am

    The whole poll looks largely strawman. Are gheys currently regularly banned from restaurants? From housing? Where?

    OTOH, if they had added shit that really applies, like “marriage” or “spousal bennys”, watch that value plummet to sub-20% range in the Grewgrass State.

  49. 49.

    jrg

    February 9, 2011 at 11:33 am

    @EconWatcher:

    I don’t recall a lot of stoking of bigotry.

    How about “Obama sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists”? That seemed to me as stoking bigotry, given the truth of his relationship with Ayers, combined with the fact that a lot of right-wingers still think he’s a Muslim (and, let’s be honest, Muslim = terrorist in many of these people’s “minds”).

  50. 50.

    WyldPirate

    February 9, 2011 at 11:35 am

    Off-topic, but my TeeVee just said that Jim Webb D-VA, won’t seek re-election in 2012.

    I think George Allen is going to run again.

    The Rethugs are going to walk away with a filibuster proof margin in 2012–wait and see.

  51. 51.

    Stillwater

    February 9, 2011 at 11:35 am

    @A Farmer: Exactly. I’ve heard that well concealed protocols call for a period of ‘indoctrination’ into the deeper, more subtle, mysteries of the Church. Only after going through this rite of passage can the initiate be truly called an expert gay pastor.

  52. 52.

    Ash Can

    February 9, 2011 at 11:36 am

    @Zifnab: Hell, I’m surprised the TAA extension got any consideration at all in a GOP-controlled House.

  53. 53.

    TuiMel

    February 9, 2011 at 11:41 am

    I saw one of the head muckety-mucks for GOProud on with Lawrence O’Donnell last night. When it comes to bigotry (he was crowing about illegal aliens) he seems to give about as well as he gets. It made me feel zero sympathy for the opposition he is enduring. The company he has chosen to keep defines him in many respects as far as I am concerned.

  54. 54.

    Tsulagi

    February 9, 2011 at 11:44 am

    Yet, when Sarah Palin™ tweeted or burped or farted that she’s attending CPAC

    Ummm, as mentioned in your link, the gas she passed was that she’s not attending CPAC, and the American Principles principled outrage is she dared say it wasn’t because of Gooper toe tappers.

    Could be she had advance briefing of deep thinkering intel done by a RS frontpager. CPAC has now been laid bare: It’s fronting for the Muslim Brotherhood…

    This is about the influence of radical Islam over the organization that puts CPAC together, the American Conservative Union’s (ACU) board of directors. Unfortunately, it has become apparent that there are Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers, apologists, and fundamentalists sponsoring and speaking at the conference this weekend.

    There you have it, Muslim mosque building toe-tapping R-gays, now that’s a real two-fer for TP con-movers like the American Principles Project and Teabagger-Proud Red State.

  55. 55.

    Suffern ACE

    February 9, 2011 at 11:47 am

    @Zifnab: Six members of the tea party caucus “revolted” about the same share as Republicans in general who voted against the renewal. Yes, it’s some revolt going on. If every person who votes out of step with Republicans gets labeled a TEA party member, one is going to forget that the TEA party is just the Republican party that you grew up with.

  56. 56.

    Mike in NC

    February 9, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    American Principles Project

    The name needs more wingnut. How about “Real American Core Conservative Principles for the Next American Century Project”?

  57. 57.

    Don K

    February 9, 2011 at 12:44 pm

    @c u n d gulag:

    A majority (maybe even a large majority) of people support equal rights in the specified areas for me and my brothers and sisters in the abstract, but when it comes time to vote, there are damned few people for whom opposition to those rights is a deal-breaker. I would guess the number for whom support of those rights is a deal-breaker is far larger, and probably is a majority in most if not all Republican primaries.

    That’s why we can’t get a gay rights bill through the Michigan legislature. Ferchrissake, we can’t even get an anti school bullying bill passed as long as sexual orientation is one of the criteria. I would guess the results of a poll in Michigan would be strongly in favor of both, particularly in the Detroit suburbs, but for most of those in favor it’s just not a particularly salient issue on which to cast a vote.

  58. 58.

    Bubblegum Tate

    February 9, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    @Violet:

    I’d do up the gif myself, but I have precisely zero visual arts skills. But still, I think that gif would be tremendously funny and just a perfect encapsulation of Sarah Palin (patent pending).

  59. 59.

    mistermix

    February 9, 2011 at 2:12 pm

    Sorry about getting her CPAC status wrong – I fixed the post.

  60. 60.

    Nellcote

    February 9, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    LaPalin’s media withdrawl via Funny or Die:

    http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/5bc6d41ec7/sarah-palin-media-addict

  61. 61.

    Bubblegum Tate

    February 9, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    Wow. Senator Man-on-Dog knocks St. Sarah for skipping out on CPAC to get her grift on. This is the first time I have ever said this, and I imagine it will be the last time I will ever say it, but Rick Santorum is correct.

    The only question: How long before he has to walk back his remarks? Less than 6 hours?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - PaulB - Olympic Peninsula: Salt Creek Recreation Area & Kalaloch Beach
Image by PaulB (5/10/25)

Recent Comments

  • Paul in KY on Political Wins Open Thread (May 15, 2025 @ 2:33pm)
  • Paul in KY on Political Wins Open Thread (May 15, 2025 @ 2:33pm)
  • Citizen Alan on Political Wins Open Thread (May 15, 2025 @ 2:33pm)
  • Lyrebird on Political Wins Open Thread (May 15, 2025 @ 2:31pm)
  • Baud on Political Wins Open Thread (May 15, 2025 @ 2:29pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!