• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Don’t expect peaches from an apple tree.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

How can republicans represent us when they don’t trust women?

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

Compromise? There is no middle ground between a firefighter and an arsonist.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

When the time comes to make an endorsement, the pain of NYT editors will be palpable as they reluctantly whisper “Biden.”

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Everyone is in a bubble, but some bubbles model reality far better than others!

Putin dreamed of ending NATO, and now it’s Finnish-ed.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Republicans would impeach Biden if he bit into a whole Kit Kat rather than breaking the sections apart.

Every one of the “Roberts Six” lied to get on the court.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Excellent Links / “I want to say only that I am not guilty”

“I want to say only that I am not guilty”

by Anne Laurie|  February 17, 20118:59 am| 29 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, War on Terror aka GSAVE®, Security Theatre

FacebookTweetEmail

Via Esquire’s Political Blog, Tyler Cabot has a slim, heartbreaking sideview about “when America went to ‘the dark side’ to fight terrorism“:

… [The lawyer] takes one more long look around the room, at the cell and the steel bunk and the steel toilet and the O-ring drilled into the floor attached to the man’s ankles. He looks closely at the man in front of him, Noor Uthman Muhammed, prisoner 707. He is from Sudan and is accused of having been an instructor at the Khalden jihadi training camp in Afghanistan from the mid-1990s to 2000. According to his combatant-status review, he was a senior member of Al Qaeda, the “70th Taliban commander,” and “was frequently left in charge of the Khalden camp because he was judged to be good with people and could handle all aspects of the camp.” He was seized from what the government describes as a safe house owned by a senior Al Qaeda member in Faisalabad, Pakistan, in March 2002. He has been held here since, without a lawyer. In the morning, January 14, 2009, he will be brought before a military commission in the courthouse at Guantánamo Bay and formally charged with training Al Qaeda militants in Afghanistan. It is one of the last war-crimes commissions of the Bush era, a final attempt to advance the commission and the war-crimes process to the point where the new president cannot stop them.
[…] __
He has thirty minutes, maybe less, to explain the intricacies of military commissions to a man who for the last seven years has been chained in a box on an island, cannot read or write, and doesn’t trust anyone…
__
Next, most important, comes the plea. My father spent hours the night before trying to figure out how to explain this. He read the prisoner’s combatant-status review from October 2004. “I did not see bin Laden, nor did I meet him,” the prisoner told the review board at the time. “As I previously told you, I have no knowledge of Al Qaeda, and I don’t know anybody from there. But if you want to say that I’m Muslim and want to make believe I belong to Al Qaeda, then that is something different.”
__
It will be the same today. The prisoner will want to deny the charges against him. And why not?
__
But he can’t. It’s one of the peculiarities of the commission system. If he pleads not guilty, if he accedes to cooperate with the system arrayed against him in any way, he’ll be tacitly accepting the validity of the charges. He’ll be recognizing the authority of the United States of America to continue to imprison him. And he’ll forfeit the right to challenge not only the specific charges against him but the validity of the entire proceedings…

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Type II Diabetes Here I Come
Next Post: The Death and Life of the Great American School System (part one) »

Reader Interactions

29Comments

  1. 1.

    low-tech cyclist

    February 17, 2011 at 9:12 am

    It’s good to know that our dearly departed Bush Administration was using Catch-22 as a guide to its operations.

    Along with 1984, of course.

  2. 2.

    El Cid

    February 17, 2011 at 9:25 am

    It wasn’t to fight terrorism. It was the pursuit of a version of power which is not restrained by hated limits.

    Just like every violent and repressive US maneuver in the 3rd world was justified by the bullshit cover of “anticommunism”, now every vicious attack on legal and moral restraints on the violence of officials against people they suspect or just hate are said to be inspired by “security” or “anti-terrorism.”

  3. 3.

    numbskull

    February 17, 2011 at 9:34 am

    Just pure evil.

  4. 4.

    priscianus jr

    February 17, 2011 at 9:41 am

    @low-tech cyclist:

    our dearly departed Bush Administration was using Catch-22 as a guide to its operations. Along with 1984…

    And Kafka … can’t forget Kafka.

  5. 5.

    singfoom

    February 17, 2011 at 9:47 am

    And yet we by social contract pretend that there is a thin veneer of rule of law in this country.

    The rule of law will never return to this country if we do not prosecute the criminals of the previous administration and anyone and everyone who ever tortured anyone in the name of the United States of America.

    Call it a pony, call me a firebagger, but that’s the fucking truth. Absolutely fucking sickening that my country did this to anyone.

    Or in this case, maybe they didn’t torture, they just held someone for years without due process.

    It makes me physically ill to consider that this was done in our name. There is no rule of law until those at the top are subject to it as well.

  6. 6.

    cmorenc

    February 17, 2011 at 9:54 am

    I’m lost how pleading “not guilty” can EVER be any kind of admission of ANYTHING, including the validity or right of the tribunal holding you to proceed. Even on the civil side of federal courts, you are permitted to make a “special appearance” in a given court, represented by counsel licensed in that venue, in order to contest the jurisdiction of the court over the case. This is monstrous that whatever statute or other underpinning the tribunals are allegedly authorized under is written (or interpreted to allow) such that ANY form of participation in the only tribunal offered an incarcerated prisoner is tantamount to recognizing the legality of any of its methods or proceedings against the prisoner.

  7. 7.

    numbskull

    February 17, 2011 at 9:57 am

    @cmorenc: As I said, pure evil.

  8. 8.

    Zifnab

    February 17, 2011 at 10:02 am

    But he can’t. It’s one of the peculiarities of the commission system. If he pleads not guilty, if he accedes to cooperate with the system arrayed against him in any way, he’ll be tacitly accepting the validity of the charges. He’ll be recognizing the authority of the United States of America to continue to imprison him. And he’ll forfeit the right to challenge not only the specific charges against him but the validity of the entire proceedings…

    So if you plead not-guilty then you admit that you are guilty? Man, why on earth would anyone have a problem with military commissions? I can’t see a single thing wrong here.

  9. 9.

    lllphd

    February 17, 2011 at 10:19 am

    my god, this is taken right out of the medieval book of justice: throw the witch into the water to see if she floats; if she does, she’s a witch and we’ll kill her. if she drowns, she was innocent.

    perfect justic.

  10. 10.

    gnomedad

    February 17, 2011 at 10:19 am

    @El Cid:

    It was the pursuit of a version of power which is not restrained by hated limits.

    The latest winger meme seems to be that libruls, shamefully, do not believe sufficiently strongly in “American exceptionalism”. Which seems to mean we do whatever the hell we want and it’s awesome because it’s us doing it.

  11. 11.

    Dennis SGMM

    February 17, 2011 at 10:19 am

    @priscianus jr:

    The post immediately brought The Castle to mind.

  12. 12.

    The Moar You Know

    February 17, 2011 at 10:24 am

    The linked story is amazing, tedious family father/son bullshit aside.

    Perhaps this is just a function of me getting old, or it may really be true; this nation that I live in, that I grew up in, is no longer America.

  13. 13.

    Culture of Truth

    February 17, 2011 at 10:33 am

    So you plead not-guilty then you admit that you are guilty?

    I don’t think so, but in any case it’s confusing, if not misleading.

    At one point the article states that if he pleads not guilty he will forfeit the right to challenge the specific charges against, implying he cannot later plead not guilty, and yet at another point clearly states that
    pleading not guilty would only waive the right to challenge the government’s right to charge him at all.

  14. 14.

    jwb

    February 17, 2011 at 10:44 am

    @Culture of Truth: I think it’s that if you plead not guilty you acknowledge the right of the system to adjudicate your case. One of the contentions in the case seems to be that the US government/military has no proper standing to adjudicate the case.

  15. 15.

    Culture of Truth

    February 17, 2011 at 10:52 am

    @jwb: I think that’s correct. Zifnab’s misapprehension, if such it is, is understandable, though, given certain passages in the article.

  16. 16.

    cleek

    February 17, 2011 at 10:52 am

    @The Moar You Know:
    when was it ?

  17. 17.

    Stefan

    February 17, 2011 at 10:56 am

    And Kafka…can’t forget Kafka.

    Someone must have been telling lies about Yusuf Khan, he knew he had done nothing wrong but, one morning, he was arrested.

  18. 18.

    jayackroyd

    February 17, 2011 at 11:03 am

    @Culture of Truth:
    This comes up in a mystery novel I just read set in 16th century England.

    The punishment for the crime the protagonist was accused of was death. If you appeared before a jury, pleaded innocent, and were found guilty, you were hanged. But if you refused to enter a plea, you were pressed–the rocks on the board thing–until you either entered a plea or died.

    If you managed to die under this particular bit of torture (they added the rocks slowly) then your heirs received your assets, rather than having them revert to the state as would be the case if you were found (or pleaded) guilty.

  19. 19.

    El Cid

    February 17, 2011 at 11:11 am

    @gnomedad:

    The latest winger meme seems to be that libruls, shamefully, do not believe sufficiently strongly in “American exceptionalism”. Which seems to mean we do whatever the hell we want and it’s awesome because it’s us doing it.

    Haughty wording by many US politicians and writers and orators aside, this is how it has always been. In any real sense, this has characterized US actions as well. In its most extreme and brute form in foreign policy.

    The way the US government fights court cases filed or decisions made against it by the International Court of Justice is to act like mafiosi and threaten the nations whose citizens or governments are filing or winning the cases to drop the case.

  20. 20.

    someguy

    February 17, 2011 at 11:16 am

    The whole point isn’t winning any particular fight with any particular group, it’s about maintaining hegemony through terrorizing innocent people.

    The fact that this guy is probably innocent, is all the better if the goal is to terrorize and establish dominance.

  21. 21.

    El Cid

    February 17, 2011 at 11:21 am

    To let a bunch of innocent people push the USA around just because they might not have done what we said they done is to let our enemies think we’re weak and they can then destroy us by not doing stuff to us.

  22. 22.

    Geeno

    February 17, 2011 at 11:28 am

    @jayackroyd: That’s actually a true story from the Salem Witch Trials of 1692. Giles Corey

  23. 23.

    PWL

    February 17, 2011 at 12:20 pm

    It says a lot of sad things about our government that it developed a system as Kafkaesque and cruel as anything devised by the Soviet Union–or by a medieval king–all the while loudly proclaiming our allegiance to “human rights” and “the rule of law.”

  24. 24.

    goblue72

    February 17, 2011 at 12:24 pm

    Gulag Americano.

  25. 25.

    goblue72

    February 17, 2011 at 12:24 pm

    Gulag Americano.

  26. 26.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    February 17, 2011 at 1:31 pm

    Glad Tyler chose writing. His dad sounds like a real shitbag, current gig notwithstanding.

    And maybe that’s how I lived with it. But I also knew one thing: With four children, I couldn’t be a public servant the whole time. I just couldn’t do it.

    Really? Four kids is all it takes to sell your soul to the devil?

  27. 27.

    Ruckus

    February 17, 2011 at 2:07 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:
    For some the price seems to be much less.

  28. 28.

    low-tech cyclist

    February 17, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    @priscianus jr: You’re right. How the hell did I leave out Kafka?

  29. 29.

    mclaren

    February 17, 2011 at 9:46 pm

    What happens to this guy today, chained in a cell for 7 years, will happen to your black neighbor on the wrong side of town 15 years from now.

    And then 10 years after that, it’ll happen to you.

    Hear it now: believe it later.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Cold Grey Pre-Dawn Open Thread: Fading Neom Dreams (Apr 17, 2024 @ 8:17am)
  • vigilhorn on Cold Grey Pre-Dawn Open Thread: Fading Neom Dreams (Apr 17, 2024 @ 8:16am)
  • Kay on Cold Grey Pre-Dawn Open Thread: Fading Neom Dreams (Apr 17, 2024 @ 8:08am)
  • The Thin Black Duke on COVID-19 Coronavirus Updates: April 17, 2024 (Apr 17, 2024 @ 8:01am)
  • New Deal democrat on COVID-19 Coronavirus Updates: April 17, 2024 (Apr 17, 2024 @ 7:58am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!