• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

Let there be snark.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Everybody saw this coming.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Second rate reporter says what?

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Consistently wrong since 2002

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / Dirty Rotten Scoundrels

Dirty Rotten Scoundrels

by E.D. Kain|  February 20, 201112:52 am| 156 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

A reader emailed me this video, and it’s definitely worth watching:

(I really appreciate the emails and tips I’ve been getting lately. Keep ’em coming. Email me here, Twitter me here.)

Also from the inbox: this PolitFact report is worth a read. Even though Walker is playing dirty tricks, it’s important to keep facts straight. His tax cuts aren’t the root of the current budget shortfall (though they exacerbate future budget shortfalls), and according to the fact-checkers at PolitFact, there really was a shortfall this year despite reports to the contrary. The larger, more important thing to keep in mind, however, is that Walker’s attack on public unions does nothing to fix this. The unions have already agreed to work with the governor to help fix the deficit. It’s the Republicans who are playing politics and using this budget issue to take on the unions. This has nothing to do with deficits.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « This is repulsive
Next Post: Early Morning Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

156Comments

  1. 1.

    RalfW

    February 20, 2011 at 12:58 am

    Thanks for picking this up. Needs some more peeps seein’ good, real anger and some truthiness.

  2. 2.

    Elvis Elvisberg

    February 20, 2011 at 1:00 am

    That clip is fantastic. Thanks for posting it.

    Thanks also for hewing to the facts here. Reality-based politics, that’s always the goal.

  3. 3.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 1:00 am

    @RalfW: Yeah it’s some good ol’ fashioned righteous indignation.

  4. 4.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 1:02 am

    @Elvis Elvisberg: facts are good, yes, but this would also be much easier if I was dictator.

  5. 5.

    gbear

    February 20, 2011 at 1:03 am

    My little sister lives in DePere. I hope this is her congressman.

  6. 6.

    freelancer

    February 20, 2011 at 1:06 am

    I’m so stupid. I’m already livid about what’s going on in Wisconsin, and I’m about to start Charles Ferguson’s documentary Inside Job. It’s like I’m planning to give myself a stroke or something.

  7. 7.

    asiangrrlMN

    February 20, 2011 at 1:07 am

    I’m glad you finally posted it on its own since I linked it in the last two posts, giving you credit both times. And, yes, I agree that straight-up facts are the best. There is enough to be outraged over in this scenario without embroidering the truth.

    @freelancer: Dude. You need to space your apoplexy. Take it from one who knows.

  8. 8.

    RalfW

    February 20, 2011 at 1:07 am

    gbear:

    Gordon Hintz represents Oshkosh area.

  9. 9.

    Maude

    February 20, 2011 at 1:08 am

    Walker really got in over his head.
    Please, please let this happen to Christie.

  10. 10.

    gbear

    February 20, 2011 at 1:21 am

    @RalfW: Oh man, Did you see on his facebook page that he was on the Geraldo Rivera show on Fox News this evening? Wonder how that went?

  11. 11.

    jwb

    February 20, 2011 at 1:21 am

    @Maude: But Walker is also a total dumbfuck, and I don’t see him retreating. This is going to be a long haul, Koch, Inc will be kicking in substantial resources, I’m sure the GOP messaging team is already on site, and I think this is going to get really nasty—perhaps an unprecedented total shutdown of the state government before this is over. I think the only outs now are if the constituents in the GOP districts yell loudly enough at their representatives and senators that it becomes clear that the legislature won’t pass the bill or the protest falls apart and the legislation passes.

  12. 12.

    J. Michael Neal

    February 20, 2011 at 1:25 am

    @E.D. Kain:

    facts are good, yes, but this would also be much easier if I was dictator.

    Sorry, I get to be dictator next. You aren’t on my list of planned executions, though, so you can breathe easy.

  13. 13.

    RalfW

    February 20, 2011 at 1:34 am

    Surprise! Breitb*rt has a ‘gotcha’ video up showing ‘doctors’ handing out ‘fake sick notes’ to Madison teachers. Like 3 highschool kids who idolize O’Keefe couldn’t figure out how to pimp this idea into a ‘sting’ video.

  14. 14.

    Spaghetti Lee

    February 20, 2011 at 1:35 am

    Has anyone else seen these tweets?

    http://twitter.com/GregMitch/status/39191509370671104#
    http://twitter.com/MotherJones

    There’s a rumor that at 2 AM, Walker’s going to send in the riot cops to clean out the capital, from an anonymous source.

  15. 15.

    RalfW

    February 20, 2011 at 1:35 am

    @gbear: I don’t have cable, so didn’t see it (and really hate to even allow Fox electrons into my house) so I don’t know.

  16. 16.

    gbear

    February 20, 2011 at 1:39 am

    @RalfW: Yea, I don’t want to go watch it either.

    @Spaghetti Lee: The Mother Jones tweet was mentioned in the last two postings.
    edit: a comment on the last thread said it’s not true.

  17. 17.

    jwb

    February 20, 2011 at 1:42 am

    @RalfW: That’s the best he could come up with?

  18. 18.

    Spaghetti Lee

    February 20, 2011 at 1:43 am

    @gbear:

    Alright, thanks. Sorry for repeating what others have said.

  19. 19.

    RalfW

    February 20, 2011 at 1:45 am

    Andy Kroll from Mother Jones is in the capitol bldg in Madison, will report if riot police show up. @AndrewKroll on the Twit for those able to stay up till 2 a.m., unlike this aging gen-Xer.

    @jwb: That’s the best he could come up with?
    I dunno. I got outta there as soon as I realized where I’d clicked to. But I assume so, since the TeaParty thing was so full of nothing today.

  20. 20.

    gbear

    February 20, 2011 at 1:48 am

    @Spaghetti Lee: I was repeating it too. I was the one who brought it up on the previous treads. I hope it is a peaceful night. Time for bed…

  21. 21.

    Villago Delenda Est

    February 20, 2011 at 1:48 am

    Do you know who else went after collective bargaining and the unions as soon as he came to power?

    Just sayin’.

  22. 22.

    Yutsano

    February 20, 2011 at 1:49 am

    Angry representative is angry. And has a big point here.

  23. 23.

    freelancer

    February 20, 2011 at 1:54 am

    @asiangrrlMN:

    I figured that I’ve already read Griftopia and am up to speed on the financial crisis, “How much worse can it get?”

    I bought copies of Griftopia and gave it away as gifts, even one to my parents. My mother looked at me like I was giving her homework, as she reads Jodi Picoult and James Patterson when she does read, and my dad isn’t a big reader. I was wondering if this doc would make the point I wanted them to hear without slogging through a book they had marginal interest in. So far, it’s riveting, and a concentrated summation of what occurred, but it gets pretty deep in the weeds as far as language and financial terms are concerned. They should be able to follow it though. Here’s hoping.

    @Yutsano:

    No kidding. I just sent this and the vimeo video of the protests set to Arcade Fire to Maddow’s tipline email.

  24. 24.

    opie jeanne, formerly known as Jeanne Ringland

    February 20, 2011 at 1:56 am

    Wow.

    I was about to head to bed but it may take me a while for my blood pressure to return to normal.

  25. 25.

    Martin

    February 20, 2011 at 2:02 am

    Silly Democrat – thinks he has rights.

  26. 26.

    Yutsano

    February 20, 2011 at 2:05 am

    @freelancer: That definitely sounds like good Maddow bait. Let me know if there are any positive results. No TV and cable y’know.

  27. 27.

    Ben

    February 20, 2011 at 2:05 am

    @Maude: Christie is being really cautious right now, according to the WSJ. But we know his goals are the same.

  28. 28.

    opie jeanne, formerly known as Jeanne Ringland

    February 20, 2011 at 2:06 am

    @Maude: This December I took some Christmas cookies to the guy next door, and he started telling me how much he admires Christie for going after the public employees, yada yada, and then he starts telling me about California’s public employees. This is Washington, we just moved here from SoCal and mr opie jeanne worked in both the public and private sector. So have I, but he just retired as a public employee.

    I explained to him that no, private is paid better than public and half of our health and retirement benefits as public employees are paid for by us, explained that PERS had done so well until the market crashed that public entities hadn’t even been required to kick in their half for years, etc. and he says to me, “Well, it used to be that way in California but not recently, it’s just gotten out of hand.” Really?

    I said, “We only retired last December. Your information is wrong.”

  29. 29.

    Ben

    February 20, 2011 at 2:06 am

    @Yutsano: email this to Maddow!

  30. 30.

    Ben

    February 20, 2011 at 2:08 am

    If Koch brothers never went after Jane Mayer of the New Yorker, i bet Sullivan would be cheering them on.

  31. 31.

    asiangrrlMN

    February 20, 2011 at 2:09 am

    @freelancer: Hm. See your point. DVD better than book in terms of easier to engage. But still, for your own health, take a break between indignations.

  32. 32.

    Spaghetti Lee

    February 20, 2011 at 2:14 am

    A question: Is what the Wisconsin 14 doing right now illegal? I’ve got a libertarian friend of mine claiming they’re in violation of this statute: http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/946/II/12 and that it’s a felony and that they’ll go to prison. Is this wrong?

  33. 33.

    freelancer

    February 20, 2011 at 2:15 am

    @asiangrrlMN:

    take a break between indignations

    If I were of that mind, I wouldn’t be engaged in politics at large. I’d probably breathe easier and sleep better, but that’s just not me. I gotta be informed, it’s my lot in life.

  34. 34.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 20, 2011 at 2:19 am

    EDK if you keep this up we’ll have to get you a headband, tie-dyed shirt, and – no doubt – hair extensions.

    BTW – thanks, this deserves band width and broader play.

  35. 35.

    Mnemosyne

    February 20, 2011 at 2:20 am

    @Spaghetti Lee:

    Given that every other part of 946 has to do with accepting bribes or giving unfair advantage to your cronies, I think your libertarian friend is severely stretching the definition of “misconduct” if he thinks it applies to the current situation. Refusing to appear at the capitol to vote is not the same thing as accepting a bribe.

  36. 36.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 20, 2011 at 2:22 am

    @freelancer:
    If it were riding season I might have better luck ignoring this shit – as is, not only no riding but work is … well, not. Too much time.

    I’m going to play Red Dead Redemption Free Roam Hardcore now, that’ll satisfy the urge to kill something.

  37. 37.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 2:22 am

    @Chuck Butcher: My hair’s getting kind of shaggy and long all on its own right now, actually…

  38. 38.

    Yutsano

    February 20, 2011 at 2:22 am

    @Spaghetti Lee: I’m guessing they’re thinking of this:

    Intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the officer’s or employee’s office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law;

    and it’s pretty wide open to interpretation. And even then I doubt you could get twelve Wisconsin citizens to agree on the charge. I guess it depends on how wingnutty the Attorney General of Wisconsin is, if at all.

  39. 39.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 20, 2011 at 2:24 am

    I don’t have permission to edit my own fucking comment? with 4 minute to go?

    *edit
    I have a very broad definition of riding season, but snow on the roads ain’t part of it.

  40. 40.

    Spaghetti Lee

    February 20, 2011 at 2:25 am

    @Yutsano:

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2011/02/wisconsin_attorney_general_hea.html

    Uh-oh.

    But thanks for your guys’ help, although this jackass probably won’t listen.

  41. 41.

    Mnemosyne

    February 20, 2011 at 2:26 am

    @Yutsano:

    I don’t think that reporting to the capitol to make up part of a quorum counts as “mandatory,” though. That’s why the quorum requirement exists — if the people who disagree with you stay away, you don’t get to vote without them.

    Any halfway decent defense attorney would get the charges dismissed PDQ, because otherwise you’re invalidating something like 500 years of parliamentary rules.

    ETA: Not that invalidating centuries of law and procedure means jack shit to the wingnuts if it looks like it could gain them a half inch of advantage over everyone else.

  42. 42.

    Nick

    February 20, 2011 at 2:26 am

    @Spaghetti Lee:

    Is this wrong?

    Depends. if I’m reading this right, it does sound like what they’re doing could be a felony, but it also says courts cannot enforce legislative rules…I’m not sure if quorum counts as legislative rules or a legal requirement. If it isn’t considered “legislative rules,” then they’re definitely breaking the law.

  43. 43.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 20, 2011 at 2:27 am

    @E.D. Kain:
    Uh-oh…

    there must be something about WP (FYWP) that is bad for conservative-ness…

    *gotten past shaggy now, can do a nice grey pony tail, short one but a pony tail, if so inclined. protest or cold weather or … fuggit thing.

  44. 44.

    freelancer

    February 20, 2011 at 2:28 am

    @Chuck Butcher:

    I love RDR, but the online component is worthless to me.

  45. 45.

    jwb

    February 20, 2011 at 2:28 am

    @Spaghetti Lee: Is the Attorney General a Dem or a Gooper? If the AG thought there was a case and inclined to press it, I’m sure the threat would already be out there, so call me doubtful.

  46. 46.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 20, 2011 at 2:30 am

    @Nick:
    I’d pay good money to watch this tried out…

  47. 47.

    Spaghetti Lee

    February 20, 2011 at 2:33 am

    @jwb:

    Gooper, apparently. I guess a lot of it depends on the situation. If the Dems end up winning this fight and the 14 become heroes, I’d think the odds of a prosecution are less.

  48. 48.

    Yutsano

    February 20, 2011 at 2:33 am

    @Spaghetti Lee: The uh-oh in my case is that the AG is a legal idiot. Vinson did not call for injunctive relief in his decision, which therefore means it’s not binding because it’s not considered settled law. But I’d love it if a bunch of kids get thrown off their parents’ insurance there now just to show how bad Republican rule is. They might end up just as toast there as they are in California.

  49. 49.

    jwb

    February 20, 2011 at 2:36 am

    @Spaghetti Lee: I think the odds of prosecution are zero either way, though I could see a threat being used in an attempt to get the senators to come back.

  50. 50.

    Nick

    February 20, 2011 at 2:36 am

    @jwb:

    Is the Attorney General a Dem or a Gooper? If the AG thought there was a case and inclined to press it, I’m sure the threat would already be out there, so call me doubtful.

    Republican.

  51. 51.

    asiangrrlMN

    February 20, 2011 at 2:36 am

    Go, Wisconsin 14! And, again, my house in an undisclosed location in MN is open to you.

  52. 52.

    Nick

    February 20, 2011 at 2:37 am

    @Yutsano:

    But I’d love it if a bunch of kids get thrown off their parents’ insurance there now just to show how bad Republican rule is.

    tell me you didn’t just say that.

  53. 53.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 20, 2011 at 2:37 am

    @freelancer:
    I started out RDR online sort of non-commital. with all the downloads and a familiarity with some of the community (who to play posse with) it has gotten pretty interesting. Chat capabilities help a great deal.

    I’m Lvl 47 out of 50 now all Hardcore. I’d have quit it without all the variations available and some “mentors.” My “Friends List” is invaluable and pretty exclusive, you get there because I’ve played with you for awhile and like how you do things. Makes a big difference to the experience. As for single player mode, I vastly prefer Oblivion or Fallout 3/New Vegas to RDR.

  54. 54.

    Spaghetti Lee

    February 20, 2011 at 2:39 am

    Well, what was the ultimate fate of the Texas 51? Did they go to prison? It seems like if they didn’t, for doing basically the same thing, then these guys won’t, especially in a much more liberal state where the liberal community is in a fighting mood.

  55. 55.

    MikeJ

    February 20, 2011 at 2:40 am

    Appearing for a vote isn’t mandatory. My guess is you could pull the roll call votes and find an example of most of the sitting reps missing at least one vote.

    I don’t think that the sergeant at arms has notified them that there is a quorum call, and until they’ve been notified, how can they know that anybody wants them to show up and vote?

  56. 56.

    jwb

    February 20, 2011 at 2:42 am

    @Spaghetti Lee: Different states, so different laws. You can’t extrapolate from that.

  57. 57.

    Yutsano

    February 20, 2011 at 2:43 am

    @Nick: Yep. Standing by it too. You want Republicans in charge, live with the damn fucking consequences.

    @MikeJ: Even a quorum call is not a legal mandate to vote. You can even be in the building and miss a quorum call for any number of reasons. No one can FORCE them to show up, Walker is just throwing a snit by sending the state troopers after them.

  58. 58.

    jwb

    February 20, 2011 at 2:45 am

    @MikeJ: Am I wrong in thinking that the fact that the Sergeant in Arms is vested with the power of forcing legislators to appear in the chamber means that this power has frequently been needed in the past?

  59. 59.

    Ana Gama

    February 20, 2011 at 2:46 am

    Photo from Egypt. The world watches Wisconsin.

    http://twitpic.com/419nfm

  60. 60.

    jwb

    February 20, 2011 at 2:47 am

    @Yutsano: Is this true? I seem to recall that forcing legislators to appear in the chamber was one of the powers given to the sergeant in arms.

  61. 61.

    freelancer

    February 20, 2011 at 2:49 am

    @Ana Gama:

    I saw that on MaddowBlog. Pure Awesome.

  62. 62.

    MikeJ

    February 20, 2011 at 2:50 am

    @jwb: I don’t know about in Wisconsin. In the US congress they can “compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.”

  63. 63.

    Yutsano

    February 20, 2011 at 2:53 am

    @MikeJ: Pretty much that means if you report to the Sergeant At Arms you won’t be in attendance you’re not running afoul of the law. If it is true or similar in Wisconsin then there is no case. I think it would already be pursued even if the reason has to be approved. The fact that it hasn’t been is pretty telling.

  64. 64.

    jwb

    February 20, 2011 at 2:55 am

    @MikeJ: Yes, the “Quorum” article in Wikipedia has some amusing (and not so amusing) past incidents of quorum busting and “calls of the house” (compelled attendance).

  65. 65.

    Spaghetti Lee

    February 20, 2011 at 3:04 am

    Sorry for the self-pimpage, but I think we could all use a laugh at John Boehner’s expense, and I’m rather proud of this one: http://JupiterWave.deviantart.com/art/So-Be-It-198118589

  66. 66.

    Ana Gama

    February 20, 2011 at 3:22 am

    “Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies!”

    LOL

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/18/fox-reporter-greeted-with-fox-lies-chants_n_825393.html?ir=Politics

  67. 67.

    freelancer

    February 20, 2011 at 3:26 am

    @Spaghetti Lee:

    Okay, I know we went ’round and ’round last night over the efficacy of Ed Schultz, but that is pretty fucking ninja.

  68. 68.

    Spaghetti Lee

    February 20, 2011 at 3:28 am

    @freelancer:

    Aw, we didn’t mean each other no harm! Just a friendly disagreement.

  69. 69.

    Spaghetti Lee

    February 20, 2011 at 3:30 am

    @Ana Gama:

    I love the spontaneity and I get that emotions are riding high…but I just gotta think that’s not gonna go over well if it gets repeated: Shouty, angry thug assaulting dashing FOX reporter and all that. But as long as they’re reporting live, they can’t push the “Vicious union thugs tear up the wainscotting” narrative, so I guess it’s a net bonus.

  70. 70.

    Xenos

    February 20, 2011 at 4:33 am

    @Spaghetti Lee:

    946.12  Misconduct in public office. Any public officer or public employee who does any of the following is guilty of a Class I felony:
    (1) Intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the officer’s or employee’s office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or

    Is presence for determining a quorum ‘mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty’? Note that these adjectives are joined without ‘or’ between any of them, which means, I think, that they must all apply. Not knowing the legal definition of these three words in Wisconsin law, and not knowing the legislative history, you could find a fair bit of wiggle room between three. Since all three words are used, there must be a meaningful distinction between them, I would argue.

    If you can get the refusal to show for quorum vote as a implied discretionary power, I think you would be pretty clear. I would hate to try to get that past an authoritarian, wingnutty judge, though.

  71. 71.

    CaliCat

    February 20, 2011 at 5:18 am

    I’m having flashbacks to before the mid-terms when many progressives were proudly exclaiming that they were going to “stay home” on election day to punish Obama or some such crap. In fact, I distinctly remember Ed Schultz (yes, mister pro-union, “champion of the middle class” Ed Schultz) shouting about how progressives should stay home on election day because we didn’t get the public option or something like that. Well, look where we are today – where Wisconsin is today. Can we all finally agree that it’s absolutely fucking essential to keep these vicious, amoral, psychopathic Republicans out of office? What more will it take for progressives to understand that they do not have the luxury to “sit on their hands” just because they didn’t get everything they wanted on every piece of legislation? I pray the protesters win their fight in Wisconsin but if they lose, people like Big Eddie will be partially to blame.

  72. 72.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 20, 2011 at 6:50 am

    @CaliCat:
    the problem with that idea of yours is that the who stayed home wasn’t progressives it was the middle. Per polling Dems and yes left Dems turned out along with the nutters on the right. The deciding balance, as per usual in mid-terms was the middle/undecided fuckwits.

    Nice try on the hippie bashing, though. Boring as it is…

  73. 73.

    bemused

    February 20, 2011 at 7:11 am

    @Spaghetti Lee:
    When the Fox reporter asked loud man if he had an opinion, loud man’s facial expression, well duh, while continuing “Fox lies”, totally cracked me up. No doubt, Fox/wingnut world will try to make that into some kind of example of very scary, dangerous liberals but it’s free speech that is not threatening violence and doing bodily harm as we have seen and heard from rightwingers countless times.

  74. 74.

    DGC

    February 20, 2011 at 7:49 am

    Gordon Hintz is my representative in the WI Assembly. Damn, I’m proud of him.

  75. 75.

    johnny walker

    February 20, 2011 at 7:53 am

    Also important is that Walker is busting unions over the “Crisis” of a massive $140 million deficit.

  76. 76.

    WereBear

    February 20, 2011 at 7:55 am

    @opie jeanne, formerly known as Jeanne Ringland: “not recently, it’s just gotten out of hand.”

    This is wingnut talk for ANYTHING they don’t like–sure, in the distant past, that thing was started because we were kicking dying old people out of our way on the sidewalk, but… IT’S GOTTEN OUT OF HAND.

    My response is to say, “No, what’s gotten out of hand is the inequality of wealth in this country,” and I whip out a handy pie chart, which is all over the web, thanks to posts like ED Kain just did… and they gawp.

    They bluster then, but I know eventually they will be googling “inequality of wealth” just like I suggested.

    And while they probably will maintain their ignorance; it will take more effort.

  77. 77.

    Pooh

    February 20, 2011 at 8:22 am

    re: Wisco law “ministerial” basically ends the game, as that basically means rote tasks like making disclosures and filling out forms.

    Also, Methinks that word doesn’t mean what your “libertarian” friend thinks it means…

  78. 78.

    El Cid

    February 20, 2011 at 8:39 am

    Arnold Schwarzenegger’s first act as Governor in canceling a vehicle fee increase (since you can’t get a legislative 2/3rd vote to raise them as required by law) added 1/3rd to California’s budget.

    This means that conservatives can be furious with California’s public sector unions and the state needs to go after their pensions.

  79. 79.

    Xenos

    February 20, 2011 at 9:06 am

    @Pooh: Once you consider the use of ‘mandatory’ as a modifier of ‘ministerial’ you really are narrowing that definition tremendously. Also – any history of Wisconsin senators sitting out quorum calls as a sort of filibuster? If it has never been prosecuted before it would be terribly hard to convince anyone it is a truly mandatory and nondiscretionary duty.

    Short of some really clear Wisconsin case law to the effect that this is a criminal violation, this looks like serious overreach by the Governor.

  80. 80.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 9:33 am

    @E.D. Kain: blah blah blah
    when do you apolo for the harm you have done at Culture 11 and LoOG by propagandizing all these years?
    you havent changed.
    you are still pandering.
    you just pander to the juicers naow because your old team is going to LOOOOOOOOSSE forevah.

  81. 81.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 9:41 am

    @Xenos: If it is a crime to miss a quorum call, every quorum call that did not result in 100% attendance would result in potential criminal consequences for legislators. Legislators are not going to criminalize their own dentist appointments.
    @matoko_chan: The guy has said that he was wrong about a number of beliefs he used to hold. Have you never changed your mind about something? Why do you feel that he owes you an apology? Were you led astray and harmed by his previous writings? Just give it a rest already.

  82. 82.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 9:42 am

    @E.D. Kain: you HELPED build the Distributed Jesusland that put those fucktards in power.
    is it too much to ax for an apology?
    How about accepting responsibilty for your part in this?
    i dont believe you have changed a nanowafer.
    i think this is a scam.
    you dip a toe into sea of reality, “evolve” your position, and bask in the adulation of these dumb cows that think they have helped you get rational.
    prove you’ve changed.
    shrive yourself in blood, poseur.

  83. 83.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 9:46 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: he harmed the whole country.
    He was a civil libertarian spinner at Culture 11 two years ago. civil liberty was his “beat”. Conor had the call-out-crazies beat.
    where has he changed?
    zuzuspetals and i called him out on the “reasonableness” of fetus=slave and he still slid out from under that.

  84. 84.

    Reks

    February 20, 2011 at 9:51 am

    It’s odd. My opinion of E.D. Kain rises every time I read a matoko_chan screed.

    Seriously though… people’s beliefs evolve over time. Do you know who David Brock is?

    I would know. I used to be a social conservative.

  85. 85.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 9:53 am

    @matoko_chan: People have already informed you of the difference between a libertarian and a civil libertarian. You don’t seem to learn. As far as the fetus = slave thing goes, it was an asinine and offensive argument on his part. It is, however, not his obligation to respond to every demand from blog-readers. Do you still demand specific apologies from Cole for things he said in 2003? I doubt it.

  86. 86.

    Alex S.

    February 20, 2011 at 9:55 am

    @matoko_chan:

    KAAAAAIIIIIIIINNNNNNN! ! ! ! ! !

  87. 87.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 9:57 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: where does EDK make up for 3 years of spin at Culture 11, at TAS, at LoOG? I read him when he mused out loud that the teahadis were actually fiscal conservatives, that birthers weren’t really racist, that Brietbart was a noble journalistic pioneer.
    He helped build the Distributed Jesusland that got these got these fuckers elected.
    Where is the apolo for 3 years of destructive spin and lies?
    Sure naow he wants to switch sides.
    i think he should have to shrive himself in blood first.

  88. 88.

    numbskull

    February 20, 2011 at 10:01 am

    ED, you’re not quite there yet. Yes, the Politfact opinon piece provides more information and nuance, mainly by making the point that Maddow’s statement is weakened when placed in the larger context of state budgetary issues. However, the even larger context, and arguably one closer to reality, is that the budget shortfall, as projected, can easily be addressed without resorting to ANY of the responses the Republicans are trying to force through.

    That is, the fundamental message of Maddow and others is correct: There is NO crisis in Wisconsin beyond what has been manufactured by the Governor and his Republican fellow travelers. What they are faced with are relatively mild budgetary challenges that are worked out in State Houses all the time without any histrionics. It’s called competent leadership.

  89. 89.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 10:02 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: He was a “civil libertarian” at Culture 11. That was his “beat”, like Young Conor’s was horrible-talk-radio hosts and Palin-is-a-retard.
    i can get links.
    where has he changed? hes still clutching his pearls and wringing his hands over conservative disdain for civil liberties.
    hes still pandering. he just panders to juicers now.

  90. 90.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 10:07 am

    aimai got him cold.
    hes looking for approval.
    he wont accept a picometer of responsibilty for the destruction he and his ilk have wrought on our country.
    he wants you to pet him and tell him hes evolving.

    well, SHOW ME the evolution.
    SHOW ME where hes changed.
    im an empiricist, membah?

    give me blood.

  91. 91.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 10:13 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    Do you still demand specific apologies from Cole for things he said in 2003?

    Cole and I have been shrived in blood.
    we have accepted responsibilty for BEING WRONG.
    EDK never has. he slid out from under the fetus=slave eumeme even.
    Im just axin for EDK to do what Cole and I did.
    Shrive himself.

  92. 92.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 10:15 am

    @matoko_chan: Just for shits and giggles, what, from Kain, would satisfy you? What specifically would he need to do or say?

  93. 93.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 10:24 am

    @numbskull: I say as much in this post.

  94. 94.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 10:26 am

    PS I never worked at Culture11. MC is just mad that I banned her. I’d do it again in a heart beat.

    Also, I’ve never once praised Breitbart. What gibberish.

  95. 95.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 10:27 am

    MC have you ever apologized for your neocon blogging?

  96. 96.

    numbskull

    February 20, 2011 at 10:27 am

    @E.D. Kain: Ah, well then it’s too subtle for me and my one-coffee-shorted morning. It happens.

  97. 97.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 10:28 am

    @E.D. Kain: Are you planning on shriving yourself to satisfy her? Inquiring minds want to know.

  98. 98.

    numbskull

    February 20, 2011 at 10:30 am

    And BTW, thanks for the video link. I’ve sent it to both of my friends. ;)

  99. 99.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 10:36 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: Good lord no. I could care less about satisfying her. But, to set the record straight:

    Never worked at C11, never wrote at TAS. These are both just blatant untruths. MC hates me because I banned her and didn’t publish a guest post she submitted to The League. Not too long ago she emailed me to tell me I was “alright afterall” and then, not long after that, decided to troll me again. I in no way want to appease her. She’s nothing more than a troll, and has written pretty awful racist things. Why we don’t ban her here is beyond me. But that’s not my call.

    Re: the fetus/slave analogy that’s not one I ever made. It’s one I sought to understand through writing. The last time I wrote about it I went out of my way to explain I thought it was a wrong-headed, pointless analogy but still try to explain why people were using it.

    I’m not going to apologize for every stupid thing I’ve said. For the last two years I’ve also been against torture, war, and many of the idiotic things conservatives have said. I’ve been wrong also and have admitted as much. Nothing will appease a troll, even this little feeding here.

  100. 100.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 10:37 am

    @numbskull: No worries, by the way. Maybe I wasn’t clear enough though I tried to be.

  101. 101.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 10:45 am

    fetus=slave is a perfect example. i never thought EDK believed that.
    but i deplore his assertion that this a “reasonable” belief to hold.
    It is not a “reasonable” belief to hold.
    Like the conservative leadership’s assertion that birtherism was a reasonable belief in the beginning…or what EDK asserted–that birthers are not racists.
    But look what has happened.
    Conservatives have tried to turn off the memetically inbred racism in their base, and it apparently cannot be done. Birtherism is subliminated racism, because overt racism is taboo in contemporary America. Conservatives have tried to persuade their base on this starting at last years CPAC and the numbers have not changed…last year around 3/4 of conservative voters polled as either overt birthers or uncertain..
    In the 2011 survey 51% dont believe our president is an american, and 21% are “not sure”.
    While there is nothing in the constitution forbidding people to hold bad, stupid, wrong, counterfactual ideas, it is WRONG to help them try to impose those beliefs on other citizens.
    That is why EDK banned me at LoOG, because i refused to let him say those positions (AGW denial, supplyside econonic, IDT, fetus=slave) are “reasonable”.
    And he would ban me here if Cole would let him.

  102. 102.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 10:46 am

    @E.D. Kain: That makes sense to me. As far as apologizing goes, one changes over time and, in my opinion, one only need apologize for one’s actions if someone was hurt by them. If not, it is enough for one’s credibility to acknowledge the change. I have been always been generally on the left side of most of the issues of the day, so I have not had to deal with walking across the aisle as some of you have done. I do not know if I could manage it with as much grace as you are showing.

  103. 103.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 10:47 am

    @E.D. Kain: yup. I killed Jinnderella.
    there was blood.
    and now i attack you lying fuckers at every opportunity with my truth sword.
    that is why you banned me at LoOG.
    do you want to see the mails?
    i assume you deleted your copies.

  104. 104.

    Xenos

    February 20, 2011 at 10:55 am

    @matoko_chan: The harm Kaine has done at Culture11 and LoOG?

    How powerful do you think he is? Why the creepy stalkery schtick?

  105. 105.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 10:57 am

    @E.D. Kain: you commented at TAS and culture 11. you have never changed your civil libertarian position.

    has written pretty awful racist things.

    link please. ffs im not a racist. i despise proselytizers and im an IQist.
    how is that racist? you say racist because that is an easy strawman.

    Not too long ago she emailed me to tell me I was “alright afterall” and then, not long after that, decided to troll me again.

    it became apparent you were faking it when you told me Newton and Galileo were first culture intellectuals….they are second culture..scientists.
    i want you to admit you were WRONG. i withdrew my guest post when i realize LoOG was a propaganda mill for the Right.
    and i have the mails still.
    wanna see?
    again EDK, you are being anti-empirical. i am not a racist, and i resent you spinning our interaction. I approved of one post you made–but you consistantly support the conservative rationale for letting your base believe stupid, bad, wrong, antiempirical ideas, and trying to impose them on other citizens in the name of divided government.
    i see no change.

  106. 106.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 10:59 am

    @matoko_chan: I’ll engage you here for a while, mc.

    I never delete emails, nor do I publish private correspondence unless agreed upon by all parties.

    I banned you because you were a troll, and because I asked you to stop. There are plenty of commenters at the League who held my feet to the fire for any number of issues, and I never banned any of them. Explain that. Nor did I say it was a reasonable belief to hold re: fetus/slave, only that it was understandable why people who are largely ignorant of the real history of slavery might make that comparison if they are also of the belief that fetuses are actual people. That doesn’t make it right or reasonable, but I can understand why these people might make the claim. There is a great deal of ignorance and passion, and it comes to full fire on these issues.

    I have never said birtherism was okay. I never defended Breitbart. I have been, on balance, far more critical of conservatives than I have been supportive. I have realized that even that is not enough, that taking that stance is in some ways actually helpful to conservatives – the ‘useful idiot’ thing DougJ and mistermix have been talking about. I am not sorry for holding libertarian positions that were held in good faith. I was not advocating war or torture. I was writing often about the horrors of war and torture and police abuse and the war on drugs.

    I have said over and over again that I was wrong on various fiscal issues especially. Since I was always socially liberal I see no reason to apologize there or admit mistakes.

  107. 107.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 11:00 am

    @matoko_chan: You keep saying ‘civil libertarian’ like it’s a bad thing. EVERYONE should be a civil libertarian. We’d have a much better world. If I polled readers here, I think 99.99% of them would agree. Are you just totally ignorant on the definition here?

  108. 108.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 11:01 am

    @matoko_chan: I don’t even understand the Newton / Gallileo comment. Does anyone understand this?

  109. 109.

    Ash Can

    February 20, 2011 at 11:04 am

    @E.D. Kain:

    I’ll engage you here for a while, mc.

    That way madness lies.

  110. 110.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 11:07 am

    @Xenos: i was a conservative. a hereditary republican. i cast my first vote for Bush. my family had a party. i voted republican until 2008.
    here is my Hall of Shame. i don’t delete it so i can scourge myself with how stupid i was.
    that is why i know what EDK wrote. i was a regular (if dissenting) commenter at LoOG and TAS.
    shamefully, i loved culture 11….i thought it was the last hope of intellectual conservatism…it seemed like an elegant decarian math designed to preserve the values of conservatism while the GOP burned.

    and i was right.
    but Culture 11 was destroyed on the day Breitbart made the Big Hollywood blog.
    bi la kayfah.

  111. 111.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 11:09 am

    it was understandable == reasonable belief.
    do i have your permission to publish the mails then?
    and i refuse to engage you until you show me an awful “racist” thing i said.
    stand and deliver.

  112. 112.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 11:12 am

    @E.D. Kain: in the mails. about first culture and third culture intellectuals.

  113. 113.

    smedley

    February 20, 2011 at 11:13 am

    @CaliCat:
    This!

  114. 114.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 11:15 am

    @E.D. Kain: Vaguely yes, but really no. She has a reasoning from first principles versus empirical reasoning thing going on. From what I can gather, you offended against her rules and categorized the lads improperly at some point in your life. For this, you will not be forgiven unless, if I understand her correctly, you join the cult of Mithras and bathe in the blood of a bull.

  115. 115.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 11:16 am

    im going boarding.
    you have some time to marshall your arguments and find a link where i say something AWFUL racist.
    again, im an IQist. i dont give a fuck about skin color.
    you banned me because i refused to let you pander….i have the mail.
    i think you are pandering naow.
    j’refuse.

  116. 116.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 11:16 am

    @E.D. Kain:

    Well, a civil libertarian is at least an upgrade on a rude libertarian.. right?

    More importantly – what happened to your mohawk? What is this talking of growing out your hair? Hmm? Hmmm?

  117. 117.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 11:17 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I have to point out that Tokie is not and never was a Mithraist. Nor could she have been. No chicks for Mithras. Sorry, but them’s the rules.

  118. 118.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 11:18 am

    @morzer: Going all DFH I guess. Beard, too.

    @Omnes Omnibus: Hey, Mithras is alright. I’m more of a Loki guy myself, but Mithras is better than some.

  119. 119.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 11:19 am

    @smedley: no, it was the empowerment of Distributed Jesusland.
    and EDK was a soljah in the cause when i knew him.

  120. 120.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 11:20 am

    @E.D. Kain:

    Scarlet streaks in the hair? Go on, mark your new allegiance to radical soc.ialism! You know you want to!

    Seriously though, use Cleek’s pie filter and kick MadHokieChan off your mental island. It really does improve your quality of life.

  121. 121.

    smedley

    February 20, 2011 at 11:22 am

    @Chuck Butcher: Hmmm…
    Not so much around here. Dems stayed home; to “…make a statement.” Fortunately the R Gubernatorial candidate was such a whack job,many R’s couldn’t stand him.

  122. 122.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 11:26 am

    @morzer: For the record, it is my understanding that she wants Kain to worship Mithras, not that she herself is a member of the cult. I do not pretend to know why this would appease her.

  123. 123.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 11:26 am

    and if any of you try to follow the links to gnxpscifi from my hall of shame, razib deleted our gnxp scifi sub-blog when i became a liberal and a muslimah.

    ya-haqq!

  124. 124.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 11:30 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    Well, she ain’t got no Mithras standing, and anyway, last time I heard she’d “reverted” to Islam, which seems a sad occurrence for that faith. Leaving all that aside, I am sure the fratres would welcome Kain, regardless of MadTokieSham’s reaction. Personally, I suspect she’s an alter ego of Karl Rove. Probably the way he lets off steam after a long day’s lonely bigotry.

  125. 125.

    Tim

    February 20, 2011 at 11:30 am

    Wow. Passion on behalf of progressive/liberal values. Who knew?

    We could use a little of this in D.C. from the White House and congressional Dems.

  126. 126.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 11:34 am

    @E.D. Kain:

    I banned you because you were a troll,

    relly? you did?
    then ban DougJ. he reamed trolled you a thousand times better than i ever did.

  127. 127.

    gravie

    February 20, 2011 at 11:34 am

    When I see “makato_chan” I scroll, scroll, scroll. In other news, that clip was AWESOME!!!!! I’m energized for the entire day.

  128. 128.

    smedley

    February 20, 2011 at 11:36 am

    @E.D. Kain: E.D, you are feeding the beast. It just leads to more tedious arcane posts. Let’s move on for the benefit of the commentariat sanity, please.

  129. 129.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 11:42 am

    @matoko_chan: Quality matters, dear.

  130. 130.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 11:44 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    U izz a Cudlip!

    Sorry, couldn’t resist.

  131. 131.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 11:50 am

    @morzer: And quite possibly a bio-luddite.

  132. 132.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 11:54 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    Does that make you a cud-lud? Or a bio-lip?

  133. 133.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 11:55 am

    @morzer: One prefers cuddite.

  134. 134.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 11:56 am

    @smedley: this was my only and my last attempt at reasoning. Done now.

  135. 135.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 11:59 am

    @E.D. Kain:

    You pledge never to reason again? That seems a bit extreme. Or are you applying the principle of “If you can’t beat them, join them”?

  136. 136.

    buckyblue

    February 20, 2011 at 12:09 pm

    I am waiting for the WI14 to be arrested, hauled back to the senate chamber to force the quorum, and then be tried for what they did. Tough to think of too many other images that would have that much power for the cause. JB Van Hollen is the AG and is doucheie wingie with a touch of independence at times. Koch bros are threatening to recall any republican senator who votes against this bill.

  137. 137.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 20, 2011 at 12:14 pm

    @buckyblue: There is nothing on which to base an indictment. Individual legislators miss quorum calls all the time.

  138. 138.

    rikyrah

    February 20, 2011 at 12:22 pm

    saw this yesterday, and went BRAVO watching it.

  139. 139.

    jinxtigr

    February 20, 2011 at 12:40 pm

    @matoko_chan:

    Cole and I have been shrived in blood.

    When you’re done with that, can you shrive my car?

    Cos’ I’m gonna be a star :)

  140. 140.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 12:44 pm

    @morzer: my last attempt to reason with m c over this.

  141. 141.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm

    @jinxtigr:

    Actually, shriving is when a priest hears confession, prescribes some form of penance, and absolves the penitent. Nothing to do with blood whatsoever. Still, you could talk to the car about its faults, I guess.

  142. 142.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    @E.D. Kain:

    Well, you’ve shown admirable patience, although reasoning with the alogical is a bit like asking a tree stump to dance.

  143. 143.

    Nutella

    February 20, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    @buckyblue:

    And if the D’s threaten to recall them for voting for it they’re in a tough spot. Probably a good idea to start collecting signatures just for the current outrages Gordon Hintz calls out.

  144. 144.

    Nutella

    February 20, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    @Spaghetti Lee:

    Is what the Wisconsin 14 doing right now illegal? I’ve got a libertarian friend of mine claiming they’re in violation of this statute: [link] and that it’s a felony and that they’ll go to prison.

    That word libertarian — I don’t think it means what your friend thinks it means. The government convicting and jailing someone for not showing up at a vote is about the opposite of ‘libertarian’. But both words ‘conservative’ and ‘libertarian’ are now used for crazy extreme radical ideas.

  145. 145.

    asiangrrlMN

    February 20, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    Goddamn it lots of pie in this thread. Y’all are making me hungry.

  146. 146.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 2:29 pm

    @asiangrrlMN:

    Did ED Kain and you ever touch base?

  147. 147.

    imonlylurking

    February 20, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    and now i attack you lying fuckers at every opportunity with my truth sword.

    Is that +10?

  148. 148.

    E.D. Kain

    February 20, 2011 at 5:12 pm

    @morzer: Not yet. I’m not recruiting just now – other projects are taking all my time up, and new recruits are always a LONG process anyways especially since our last disastrous attempt at expanding the roster.

  149. 149.

    Leah

    February 20, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    I’m a regular BJ reader, but an intermittent commenter, but I’d like to go on record to thank E.D. for sharing his journey with us, which I find both moving and heartening.

    Getting back to that PolitFact article, I think it’s right in terms of a narrow interpretation of the notion that Gov Walker created the entire shortfall and the looming larger debt coming up in the next budget period. However, there appears to be considerable evidence that he always planned to use the budget issues as a cudgel to attack the fundamental structures that make unionization a viable option, and to do it to 90 percent of state workers who are already union members.

    Brian Beutler wrote the original story at TPMDC and he had more sources than Rachel Maddow did; it’s worth taking a look at.

    There’s video evidence that during the lame duck period after Walker was elected but before he took office that he was intent on decertifying public unions, using the same excuse that without the power of an organized workforce the state could save money.

    Also worthy of note is this Beutler post comparing the way the previous Democratic-controlled legislature met an even bigger budget shortfall without threatening the entire institution of collective bargaining.

  150. 150.

    morzer

    February 20, 2011 at 5:52 pm

    @E.D. Kain:

    Well, we did rather suggest that Draco Malfoy might not be your wisest use of a first-round pick. As for JaMarcus Russell….

  151. 151.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 10:30 pm

    @E.D. Kain: exactly.
    no link to my “awful racist” statements, no explanation of why you banned me for “trolling” but not DougJ.
    you see…..i think you’re just like Sully.
    its just the same headfake you been frontin’ with ever since i’ve read you.
    these poor marks badly want to believe they have converted you.
    but you dont sound any diff’rent to me.
    Can i print your emails?
    it would sure help explain things.
    lawl.
    i have a great email from a NRO frontpager about how they had to have Team McCain vet anything they said about race in the 2008 election. i have email from another NRO frontpager about what he thinks of Palin.
    and i have email from you telling me why you banned me.
    ;)

  152. 152.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    @E.D. Kain: One link? One awful racist thing i said? c’mon, wheres your search fu.
    there arent any are there…..
    i dont see where you have changed. you still pimp the “innovation of the market”, you still refuse to educate the base.
    you wanna switch horses naow. who could blame you?
    but you need to take responsibility for the harm you have done.
    and you are still doing it.
    I chopped off Jinnderellas head.
    What is your penance?
    the LoOGies are still going strong with AGW denialism, IDT, ensoulment, homophobia masked as defense of marriage, supplyside economics and market innovation….and reasonable/understandable fetus slaves.
    you are a liar.
    and these simpletons here want desperately to believe they have persuaded you.
    well……cross the aisle then.
    i double dog dare you.
    go all the way.

  153. 153.

    matoko_chan

    February 20, 2011 at 11:12 pm

    wait a sec…..what happened to that black girl that was posting there….was that EDKs “disaster? i guess i better go look.
    l8r

  154. 154.

    DougW

    February 20, 2011 at 11:59 pm

    republicans are hell bent on union busting. If the union busting language wasn’t in the bill, and if they were willing to cut some of their own spending (i.e. tax cuts for the rich), you could believe that these were serious legislators. As it is, they are nothing other than self interested asshats that want to do everything they can to cater to the right and strike down anything progressive while they can.
    I predict that they are a minority party after this little party of fascism that they’ve enacted in the name of conservative ideals (that have never worked in the past and will never work in the future). Most Americans that voted for these asshats had no idea what they were going to get. In 2012, they will have had the experience of the 2010-2012 period to get to know their ass bandits… Will they want to keep these folks in power? I don’t think so…

  155. 155.

    matoko_chan

    February 21, 2011 at 7:49 am

    She’s nothing more than a troll, and has written pretty awful racist things. Why we don’t ban her here is beyond me.

    Link please.
    this is going on every thread you put up until you provide the empirical data that i said “awful racist things”.
    Are you a gentleman? I demand satisfaction. Its my right, isnt it, Cole?
    And im proud of being a troll….i follow the School of the Master, DougJ.
    ABT.
    But i only troll you. Because i think you are faking it.
    Like DougJ trolled those talking apes “principled libertarians” you are so proud of.
    You are trying relly hard to pretend that didnt happen. Are you too stupid to see it, or too humiliated to acknowlege it?
    In America libertarianism is one leg of the conservative stool. You should call yourself something else if you support civil liberty in America.

  156. 156.

    matoko_chan

    February 21, 2011 at 7:54 am

    @morzer: in the country of the blind the one eyed man(or woman) is king.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Roger Moore on Wednesday Afternoon Open Thread: Good for the Mouse! (Mar 22, 2023 @ 4:23pm)
  • bbleh on DOJ To Get Corcoran Documents! (Mar 22, 2023 @ 4:23pm)
  • Jeffro on DOJ To Get Corcoran Documents! (Mar 22, 2023 @ 4:22pm)
  • Mai Naem mobile on Wednesday Afternoon Open Thread: Good for the Mouse! (Mar 22, 2023 @ 4:22pm)
  • gvg on Wednesday Afternoon Open Thread: Good for the Mouse! (Mar 22, 2023 @ 4:22pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!