• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Republican also-rans: four mules fighting over a turnip.

Polls are now a reliable indicator of what corporate Republicans want us to think.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Fani Willis claps back at Trump chihuahua, Jim Jordan.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

The fundamental promise of conservatism all over the world is a return to an idealized past that never existed.

One of our two political parties is a cult whose leader admires Vladimir Putin.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Don’t expect peaches from an apple tree.

People are complicated. Love is not.

Ron DeSantis, the grand wizard, oops, governor of FL.

Democrats have delivered the Square Deal, the New Deal, the Fair Deal, and now… the Big Joe Biden Deal.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

Chutkan laughs. Lauro sits back down.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Economics / Fuck The Middle-Class / The fog of class war

The fog of class war

by DougJ|  February 23, 201111:08 am| 48 Comments

This post is in: Fuck The Middle-Class, Republican Stupidity, The Math Demands It

FacebookTweetEmail

A couple very smart comments on the melee in Madison.

Aiuriade:

Am I the only person who thinks that even if there isn’t a larger more sympathetic feeling towards unions in the country as a result of the current actions of various GOP governors that just the loss of votes from union households might be disastrous for the GOP in 2012. Most everything I see suggests that in national races Democrats don’t currently pick up even 60% of union household votes. If that were to go from small minority as it is now to 2:1 split or worse isn’t that really, really bad for Republicans.`

I’m just trying to see their long game here.

General Stuck:

Back when there were some adults in charge of the GOP and conservative movement, frontal assaults like this wouldn’t happen, unless initiated from the other side, like the air traffic controllers. Everything was done in a cloud of purposeful fog. The prime strategy for winger braintrust was to never get themselves into situations that created clear lines of contrast with liberals and their people friendly domestic policies, because when that happened the right wing would be exposed to their ultimate purpose and folks would side with the left, or dems. Only those issues where they knew they had the advantage, like tax cuts, were openly flogged. This must be making old gooper bulls like Jam Baker just shake their heads and sigh.

The Republican plan here was to kill off a powerful Democratic institution, labor unions. The idea was that this could be done by making labor unions into strapping young bucks buying T-bone steaks with their inflated union wages. If there were no white people in unions, this might have been a winning strategy. In the reality-based world, there are two big problems with the strategy: (1) unions aren’t “other” enough to be welfare queenized and (2) union members currently vote 35% (give or take) for Republicans and if Republicans knock that down to young buck territory (under 10%), they’re screwed.

The union-busting should have been done quietly, behind the scenes, in a way that didn’t provoke too much attention. “Bring it on” may be a good slogan for tough guy Republicans, but it’s not a great strategy when you’re badly outnumbered.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Organized Labor in America
Next Post: How They Roll »

Reader Interactions

48Comments

  1. 1.

    cleek

    February 23, 2011 at 11:12 am

    i have a hard time being as optimistic as you when the media still seems to be treating this as a budget issue with a union B-story.

  2. 2.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    February 23, 2011 at 11:20 am

    Listening to that clip, of Walker and notKoch, Walker really is infatuated with himself as a tough guy, it’s kind of pathetic; and
    @cleek:

    the media still seems to be treating this as a budget issue with a union B-story.

    He breathlessly quotes that NYT story (written by Arthur Ochs Codswallop Sulzburger VIII– Paunch to his friends) about all the “typical blue collar types” (I think he calls them) who say it’s time for these ‘public employees to make some sacrifices like everybody else’. You’d never know from following the national coverage that the unions had already agreed to pay and benefit cuts.

  3. 3.

    jwb

    February 23, 2011 at 11:20 am

    @cleek: I’m not optimistic, but I’m not pessimistic either. The protests continue, and my wife’s Facebook feed, which has a number of social conservatives on it who would normally be dittoheading Rush but who are taking the union’s side on this one.

  4. 4.

    Violet

    February 23, 2011 at 11:24 am

    Posted this suggestion in a post down below in response to someone saying that people today don’t know much about the history of the Labor movement and how much we owe them. Things like minimum wage, weekends, 40 hour workweek, maternity leave, etc. Was thinking that perhaps it’s time for Jon Stewart or Stephen Colbert to do a segment on the history of unions. Jon Stewart did a lot of good with the 9/11 responder stuff he did. Offering a history lesson about the rights we have today being because of unions could be extremely educational and helpful for a lot of his viewers.

  5. 5.

    Origuy

    February 23, 2011 at 11:25 am

    I haven’t been able to keep up with all of the threads; has anyone posted a link to Worker’s Song?
    Dropkick Murphys, with lyrics.

  6. 6.

    Doug Hill

    February 23, 2011 at 11:29 am

    @Origuy:

    Thanks, I was looking for more union songs.

  7. 7.

    Violet

    February 23, 2011 at 11:30 am

    @Doug Hill:
    Doug, you’ve seen this site, right? http://unionsong.com/

  8. 8.

    Chris

    February 23, 2011 at 11:31 am

    Yeah, I’m not that optimistic either – the village is playing the usual game and Walker’s just continuing on indifferent to public opinion. Sure, it might cost him in the future, but that doesn’t mean the union busting won’t work in before he has a chance to be removed.

  9. 9.

    Ash Can

    February 23, 2011 at 11:31 am

    Furthermore, this blatant union-busting is happening in one of the historically strongest union states. If it were happening in a state where the unions had already been significantly weakened, the reaction from the citizens themselves wouldn’t have been nearly as vehement, and the story not nearly as big as a result.

    This isn’t just a matter of Scott Walker handling this in a strikingly stupid and inept fashion, this is a matter of the Koch brothers themselves being stupid and inept by putting so many chips on someone as incompetent as Walker. Even if they were to win this battle and get this godawful bill passed, they’ve drawn an awful lot of unwanted attention to themselves, and opened more than a few eyes.

  10. 10.

    Roger Moore

    February 23, 2011 at 11:32 am

    The union-busting should have been done quietly, behind the scenes, in a way that didn’t provoke too much attention

    The problem is that it isn’t really possible to bust the unions quietly behind the scenes. That’s exactly what Walker was trying to do- he was trying to slip a union busting measure in as part of a bigger budget package- but the unions noticed and made a media event out of it. Part of the reason unions still have as much power as they do is because they’ve kept their eyes open and fought vigorously to defend what they have. Busting them in their sleep is a pipe dream.

  11. 11.

    General Stuck

    February 23, 2011 at 11:33 am

    Thanks Mr. Hill.

    blush

  12. 12.

    Mike E

    February 23, 2011 at 11:34 am

    This is the latest GOP leap in evolution, doubling down, cashing in whatever chips they have (or stole). Time will tell, though, if this will negatively affect their reproduction.

    Anybody else looking forward to Spring?

  13. 13.

    gnomedad

    February 23, 2011 at 11:37 am

    The Repubs are riding a tiger of can-you-top-this craziness. Even a attempt at stealth can get you labeled a RINO.

  14. 14.

    Stillwater

    February 23, 2011 at 11:44 am

    Re: Auliradae’s comment at the top, I (personally) think this is just the wrong way to approach the issue. Here’s a snip of an earlier comment I made that seems to me relevant here:

    @joe from Lowell: It’ll make them unpopular in the next election cycle? So what? It would fundamentally change the balance of power between labor and capital in this country.
    __
    (Me): This can’t be stated enough. Trying to understand the current GOP-led assault on labor through the prism of pure politics is a mistake. This is a game changer, with long term institutional and cultural consequences. It codifies (as does legislation like requiring 2/3 majorities for tax increases, unilateral executive control of the ‘public interest’, no bid contracts, etc) the preferred policies of the investor class at the expense of labor and little-d democracy.

  15. 15.

    Another Commenter at Balloon Juice (fka Bella Q)

    February 23, 2011 at 11:45 am

    As General Stuck aptly noted, the GOP seems to have no adult supervision at the moment, and it’s gonna get real glaringly obvious nationally when the government gets shut down. So what can we, the regular folks, do to make clear to as many people as possible (of those who remain reasonable) that the grandsons of the confederacy have teamed with the grandsons of the robber barons to keep us all down? The Village isn’t gonna help, since we know which side they’ll fellate. The MSM doesn’t seem interested; as someone pointed out, they’ll do story after story about Breitbart’s fiction. But an actual news story, of a punking that shows clearly that a Governor is clearly continuing an ongoing conversation with a funding source, which source stands to gain mightily from some hideous stuff (power plant sales, e.g.) buried in this emergency budget bill and the MSM can’t be bothered.

  16. 16.

    dollared

    February 23, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    I don’t think the Republicans have ever made so clear to everyone that they really want to make life for other people actually, materially worse.

    Most of the white middle class, and the lower half of the upper middle class, ever since WWII, knows schoolteachers, knows they have a pretty hard job, and thinks to themselves “I wish I had the summers off, but I need to get paid more than those people. God bless them for being willing to pinch pennies, live in small houses and teach our kids.”

    Attacking them just really, really puts Republican viciousness in sharp focus. Even David Brooks’ prose style can’t hide it. And the fact that most teachers and nurses are women adds an air of brutishness that is visible to all working people.

    Now – it is up to the Democrats to exploit this opening. That’s where I start to worry….

  17. 17.

    Origuy

    February 23, 2011 at 12:07 pm

    @Doug Hill: Here’s one from Brian McNeill, formerly of Battleship Band. I haven’t found a performance online. I saw him perform this in Campbell, CA a few years ago. He invites people to sing along on the chorus; not everyone does.

    SELL YOUR LABOUR NOT YOUR SOUL
    (Brian McNeill)

    Chorus:
    Young and old, true and bold
    Sell your labour not your soul
    Solidarity’s your goal – join the union

    Come and listen through the land, working woman, working man
    Young and old, true and bold – join the union
    Black, brown or white, get ready for the fight
    Young and old, true and bold – join the union
    Will you stand upon your rights or will you live upon your knees
    Doff your cap and look away while the bosses take their ease

    Unemployment is the fear the bosses whisper in your ear
    Young and old, true and bold – join the union
    Short term contract when they hire makes it easier to fire
    Young and old, true and bold – join the union
    More efficiency’s the cry, technology’s the game
    And every dividend you double – well your wages stay the same

    They say the unions’ day is done and the country’s moving on
    Young and old, true and bold – join the union
    Aye the government knows best, private sector does the rest
    Young and old, true and bold – join the union
    They’ll privatise your hopes and they’ll privatise your fears
    If they catch your children crying they’ll privatise their tears

    We will rise, we will grow, we are stronger than we know
    Young and old, true and bold – join the union
    We will not be denied for we have right upon our side
    Young and old, true and bold – join the union
    So raise the banners high, let us all march behind
    Let Scotland be the first to draw the new union line

  18. 18.

    Allan

    February 23, 2011 at 12:09 pm

    If there were no white people in unions, this might have been a winning strategy.

    This has been one of the more interesting aspects of the WI protests. If you ask any educated, reality-based American (i.e., a liberal) about the ethnic diversity of Wisconsin, they’d say, without thinking a second, “It’s pretty overwhelmingly white, right?” And they would be correct. It’s been trending a bit more diverse, but the latest numbers show it still 90+% white.

    Those with greater familiarity with the state would also volunteer that WI’s ethnic minorities are heavily concentrated in Milwaukee and the southeast closest to IL and Chicago.

    And yet, on Twitter and other social media, RW trolls have attempted to use the lack of diversity in the Madison crowds as proof that liberals are the Real Racists. Which goes to show how they grasp at straws to attack their enemies. If the rallies were in Milwaukee and a high percentage of the crowd were AA, how do you think they would characterize the event?

  19. 19.

    Sue

    February 23, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    One of the things I haven’t seen discussed anywhere is a reason union members have been moving toward Republican voting patterns – pro-life issues. While many of my union co-workers who voted against their own self-interest last fall are now waking up to the understanding of how much they have to lose, I still believe voting these union-busters out will be harder than it appears because the pro-life vote trumps everything. No one is talking about that little issue.
    No one has mentioned the planned redistricting either, or the voter id bill, both of which will help Republicans in 2012. We have a bigger fight ahead of us than is being reported.

  20. 20.

    Stillwater

    February 23, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    The Republican plan here was to kill off a powerful Democratic institution, labor unions.

    Narrowly viewed, this is true. But it is, as everyone agrees, a political loser for teh GOP, and shifts short term voting patterns in the Democrats favor. So, since this theory (of political expedience) is irrational on its own merits, it seems reasonable to conclude that there are other reasons for, as Stuck says, confronting labor head on rather than in a fog.

    There is a long game here, and if the Koch-friendly GOP governors (and etc.) can pass legislation fundamentally shifting the playing field by codifying policies that used to be determined by the electorate’s voting patterns, then they have succeeded at their main goal: dismantling programs and policies that favor labor and the middle class, and eliminating (or reducing) the threat of democracy from impinging on profits.

  21. 21.

    dollared

    February 23, 2011 at 12:13 pm

    BTW, this all might be worth the risk for Republicans. They know that public employee unions are the last serious impediment to absolute control of the political process. If AFSCME is gone, SEIU is the only remaining effective union, and it is far less focused on actual control of the political process.

    At the top, the Republicans are reality based, and here’s the proof:

    1. The Republicns read JK Galbraith very closely, and took action to eliminate all countervailing institutions.
    2. They know Marx was right except for one thing: Marx underestimated the bourgeosie.
    3. The Republicans read and memorized Saul Alinsky, and use it every day.

  22. 22.

    gbear

    February 23, 2011 at 12:14 pm

    Class warfare is extending to small businesses too. Steve Benen has been all over this this week after Jeffrey Leonard, CEO of the Global Environmental Fund, was interviewed by Stephen Colbert.

    If you missed the interview (and the article), Leonard is shining a light on a serious problem small businesses face, but which hasn’t generated much in the way of attention: “Many small firms are handicapped by a new twist on an old parasitic business practice that large corporations are using in the wake of the 2008-09 financial crisis, one that has significantly reduced the cash available to small businesses to invest and hire new employees.”

    With the exception of one client, ALL of our clients are practicing the strategy described by Mr. Leonard. I am constantly on the phone with the client’s accounting departments, my attorney, or collection agencies. For the most part, nothing works. Our clients are clients who are “flush with cash” — no doubt about it. Our mega-client has never paid on time even though our attorney firm wrote an “iron-clad contract,” the company has consistently violated the terms of the contract. The value of the contract over a two-year period meant about $400K to us. To a small company, that’s a heck of a lot and will keep a lot of folks’ lights on and health insurance paid. Not only is the mega-client now walking away from the contract without penalty, they are offering us .30 cents on the dollar for services already delivered and used. In fact, the work was so good is was to be showcased to their top management in Europe. There’s no problem with the work — they simply decided they won’t pay and are bullying us into accepting less.

    I am currently an AFSCME member, but I have in the past worked for a small firm that couldn’t make payroll because the medical center we were doing projects for wouldn’t pay their bills. I think that this problem is as bad as any that the unions are facing.

  23. 23.

    liberal

    February 23, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    @Sue:

    …I still believe voting these union-busters out will be harder than it appears because the pro-life vote trumps everything. No one is talking about that little issue.

    Well, Schiller for one talked about it a couple hundred years ago: “Against stupidity/The gods themselves/Contend in vain.”

  24. 24.

    gbear

    February 23, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    Link to Benen.

  25. 25.

    dollared

    February 23, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    @Sue: This. Pro life is sticky, although less sticky than you might think. But the voter ID and redistricting issues are huge.

    Time for me to ‘Go there.” 30 states in Republican hands? This really is Obama’s fault. If not directly for failing to frame the debate – and he really, really failed to frame the debate – then through his selection of Tim “nice guy” Kaine to run the party. It’s no accident that the Rebublican Governor’s Association spent $3.4M in Cheeseland. It’s as if the Dems really don’t get what’s at stake, still. What will it take?

  26. 26.

    liberal

    February 23, 2011 at 12:21 pm

    @Another Commenter at Balloon Juice (fka Bella Q):

    As General Stuck aptly noted, the GOP seems to have no adult supervision at the moment, and it’s gonna get real glaringly obvious nationally when the government gets shut down.

    I’d like to agree, but I don’t think it’s so obvious.

    The Rethugs control the House, so convincing people on the issue of fairness isn’t obvious. Meaning, there’s nothing procedurally unfair about the Republicans taking the government hostage; people have to feel deep down, at the level of moral axioms, that the Republicans are overreaching.

    I know Clinton managed to do it, and while that’s encouraging, it’s not proof positive about how things will wind up this time around.

  27. 27.

    kay

    February 23, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    @Sue:

    a reason union members have been moving toward Republican voting patterns – pro-life issues.

    I used to believe this, but I don’t anymore. We have a lot of anti-choice Democrats, but they vote for a pro-choice Democrat every year, because Democrats don’t nominate anti-choicers at the Presidential level.
    I now think of the people you’re talking about as “Republicans”. In my experience, if you get them off abortion, they just move to the next thing on the GOP check-list. They gotta lotta complaints, one of which is abortion.
    That’s just my experience. Yours, of course, could be different.

  28. 28.

    trollhattan

    February 23, 2011 at 12:29 pm

    My concern is the Reps seem to still wield the Mighty Wurlitzer to great effect, retaining a relentless grip on the lower middle class as they play a wicked tarantella, mach schnell.

    It’s mindboggling to me they’re able to keep such a large portion of the populace voting counter to their own self-interest, all while lining stuffing the pockets of the Uberclass. Until that changes I’m not expecting a great backlash. “Obamacare is ruinin’ mah countree. Also, too, deficits and such. (What’s a ‘deficit?’)”

  29. 29.

    shortstop

    February 23, 2011 at 12:34 pm

    Delighted to see that “the math demands it” is now a tag!

  30. 30.

    Brachiator

    February 23, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    The union-busting should have been done quietly, behind the scenes, in a way that didn’t provoke too much attention. “Bring it on” may be a good slogan for tough guy Republicans, but it’s not a great strategy when you’re badly outnumbered.

    The Republicans, especially their Tea Party vanguard, do not see themselves outnumbered or, if they do, they don’t care.

    They see themselves doing the work of the Founders and the Lord Bebe Jebus in fighting against godless Islamic liberalism. So they are willing to take the fight to the unions, to blacks and Latinos, to pre-pregnant women. They don’t need no quiet political strategery.

  31. 31.

    Mnemosyne

    February 23, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    @dollared:

    If not directly for failing to frame the debate – and he really, really failed to frame the debate – then through his selection of Tim “nice guy” Kaine to run the party.

    I disagree with you about “framing the debate” since Obama has done it over and over and over again only to get a massive yawn from the MSM, but I agree with you that Kaine was a stupid choice. It was a strategic choice because it was an attempt to make the DLC/Blue Dog faction happy, but the Blue Dogs got their asses handed to them in this election because they didn’t know what the fuck they were doing.

    Hint to future Democratic political candidates: if the president is a Democrat, don’t spend all of your time talking about how you’re going to oppose his entire agenda because it will make your constituents think they may as well vote for the Republican since both candidates are going to oppose the president anyway.

  32. 32.

    cthulhu

    February 23, 2011 at 12:41 pm

    @liberal: I agree that it is unpredictable how the shutdown will play out (I think there’s probably an 85% chance of it at this point), but the one thing that can be said about Gingrich was that he did have all his ducks in a row when he tried it. Boehner just doesn’t seem to have his heart in it this time (I suspect his corporate masters more likely view a shutdown as more problematic than helpful) but he’s got some seriously rabid (with the attendant insanity) factions to deal with. While I am sure the Village will attempt to paint both sides as at fault, it would appear that the GOP’s position may be confounded by too many voices in their defense.

  33. 33.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    February 23, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    @Stillwater:

    There is a long game here, and if the Koch-friendly GOP governors (and etc.) can pass legislation fundamentally shifting the playing field by codifying policies that used to be determined by the electorate’s voting patterns, then they have succeeded at their main goal: dismantling programs and policies that favor labor and the middle class, and eliminating (or reducing) the threat of democracy from impinging on profits.

    This is an important point. Taft-Hartley casts a long shadow, but it probably didn’t help the GOP win many votes when it was first enacted.

  34. 34.

    James E Powell

    February 23, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    @Stillwater:

    On the game changing. If the Republicans can get super-majority requirements for budgets and tax increases into the majority of state constitutions they can create a permanent upper class, immune from tax increases. With the filibuster, they already have this at the federal level.

    The ruling class is looking at changing demographics coupled with increasing demand for social services, notably Medicare. These super-majority requirements are the ruling class response.

  35. 35.

    Brachiator

    February 23, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    @cthulhu:

    Boehner just doesn’t seem to have his heart in it this time (I suspect his corporate masters more likely view a shutdown as more problematic than helpful) but he’s got some seriously rabid (with the attendant insanity) factions to deal with.

    Yep. And keep in mind that the Tea Party Palinistas see the federal government as an overreaching usurper of power that needs to be shut down in order to rescue Real Americans(tm) from its “tax and spend” clutches.

  36. 36.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    February 23, 2011 at 1:05 pm

    @James E Powell:

    The ruling class is looking at changing demographics coupled with increasing demand for social services, notably Medicare. These super-majority requirements are the ruling class response.

    And the counter-terrorism focused national security state. I’m convinced that the GWOT apparatus was designed from the beginning to be used to suppress domestic dissent. The smarter of our corporate overlords have to realise that as they turn the clock back to the 1890s some sort of anarchist response is inevitable. They are prepared to deal with it.

  37. 37.

    someguy

    February 23, 2011 at 1:11 pm

    Personally, I’m just glad we have the Koch brothers to blame for orchestrating all this from their demon lair in what, Kansas City or something?

    I wonder what it took for them to wrestle the country from George Soros’ steely clutches, and in turn what deals with the devil he had to make to steal the nation from Halliburton, and what they did to get it back from the Chinese to whom Al Gore sold it after purloining it from Jerry Falwell…

    Some people might say that we’re in these straits not because of the fiendish, feverish labors of a couple billionaires who make basically penny ante contributions to a bunch of chickenshit think tanks, but because Republicans do things differently from us because they actually view life differently, and think differently.

    But that’d be crazy talk!

  38. 38.

    Stillwater

    February 23, 2011 at 1:27 pm

    @ThatLeftTurnInABQ: I’m convinced that the GWOT apparatus was designed from the beginning to be used to suppress domestic dissent.

    As is the increased (to the point of non-news) use of SWAT teams busting down doors in no-knock raids: the ‘security theater’ of TSA; the increased ‘rights’ of cops to use lethal force for minor transgressions… All evidence of an effort to prepare people for the enactment what would otherwise be called a police state.

    I agree that the elites fully understand that as global share of US wealth and income contracts, the relative income of US citizens will also shrink, from the bottom on up, with the richest doing whatever it takes to preserve their share of what’s left. In that sense, it’s not a conspiracy theory, but the logical consequence of free-trade policies encouraging capital flight and the subsequent race to the bottom finally coming back home.

    And you know, it took bloody battles to get those middle-class floors built. It will probably take the same kind of effort (without the blood, hopefully) to keep them in place.

  39. 39.

    Stillwater

    February 23, 2011 at 1:33 pm

    @someguy: Conservatives do think differently than liberals and progressives. But to say that the GOP policies in WI are determined by the conservatives in that state, or the the electorate determines GOP polcies anywhere, is false. Usually, GOP politicians enact policies which even their constituents don’t approve of. It’s like they’ve … I donno … gone Rouge or somethin.

  40. 40.

    Joel

    February 23, 2011 at 1:40 pm

    @someguy:

    Some people might say that we’re in these straits not because of the fiendish, feverish labors of a couple billionaires who make basically penny ante contributions to a bunch of chickenshit think tanks, but because Republicans do things differently from us because they actually view life differently, and think differently.

    They (Republicans) also happen to be wrong.

  41. 41.

    piratedan

    February 23, 2011 at 2:10 pm

    @dollared: agreed, I think leaving Dean in charge would have been better for Democratic prospects. The DNC sat back and thought quietly to themselves that the folks who watch MSNBC will tell their friends and word of mouth will come through for us. In the end, those activist POS jurists on the SCOTUS tilted the playing field at just the right time to let money run the table. That one decision and the nationsl Dems complete inadiquacy in dealing with it killed 2010. The Rethugs sold the big lie, polluted the airwaves with it and here we are.

  42. 42.

    Matthew

    February 23, 2011 at 3:14 pm

    @someguy: When someone’s fucking a dog, do you stop to ask yourself why?

  43. 43.

    dollared

    February 23, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    @piratedan: Yup. The one thing I have learned is that these dickheads will never go away. They have spent 80 years trying to undo the New Deal, and they will never, ever stop.

    They must be fought tooth and nail, every day. For the rest of our lives. And our children must be taught to fight them.

  44. 44.

    stickler

    February 23, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    @ThatLeftTurnInABQ: More right than you know:

    This is an important point. Taft-Hartley casts a long shadow, but it probably didn’t help the GOP win many votes when it was first enacted.

    Not only did Taft-Hartley hurt the GOP, it probably was the one issue that kept Truman in the White House in 1948. He hammered the GOP on this in speech after speech during that campaign, and reminded union voters what would happen if the Republicans got the White House back. By almost any measure, Truman should have been a dead duck in ’48; the union vote saved his hide.

  45. 45.

    Ruckus

    February 23, 2011 at 4:54 pm

    @gbear:
    And it’s not a new problem. Posted before about the 80-81 recession that I heard business radio programs telling businesses not to pay on time, hold out 90-120 days worth. Of course big business which has lots of money makes investments with that money, so even if they pay in full eventually it’s better for them. And of course if you don’t want to do business with them, nose/spite/face. Now I fixed this a little in my last business, always got deposits, progress payments and everyone changed to COD. At worst if they failed to pay at the end I was owed 10% and they didn’t get the final product. Don’t know if I could get away with that today. And the only ass who complained was the one that I fully expected not to pay.

  46. 46.

    Chris

    February 23, 2011 at 5:58 pm

    General Stuck’s line, “Only those issues where they knew they had the advantage, like tax cuts, were openly flogged” makes me think a few things, none of them good:

    Remember how we were going to get EFCA (aka “card check”), especially once we had a filibuster-proof majority?

    This could just be a “heat check” – conservatives seeing if they’re as hot as they think they are (from basketball, when someone who’s been making shots takes a crazy one to see if it’ll go, too.

    And on the heels of that thought, it sure sounds like an easy way to move the Overton window.

    Finally, it’s more proof of the difference between Rs and Ds: Republicans fight to practice fighting, even when it’d be otherwise pointless. Ds only fight when they have to.

  47. 47.

    Comrade Kevin

    February 23, 2011 at 7:35 pm

    strapping young bucks buying T-bone steaks

    You rely on this phrase way too much, DougJ

  48. 48.

    johnny walker

    February 24, 2011 at 1:14 pm

    Unions represent what, 7% of the workforce? I don’t think they’re particularly afraid of a hypothetical single-digit shift among that small a population segment. What should worry them is that their overreach will affect the opinions of non-union workers.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Cold Grey Pre-Dawn Open Thread: Fading Neom Dreams (Apr 17, 2024 @ 8:48am)
  • Kay on Cold Grey Pre-Dawn Open Thread: Fading Neom Dreams (Apr 17, 2024 @ 8:47am)
  • Another Scott on Distribution of Medical Spending in the US Population (Apr 17, 2024 @ 8:44am)
  • WaterGirl on Tuesday Late Night Post (Apr 17, 2024 @ 8:43am)
  • SomeRandomGuy on COVID-19 Coronavirus Updates: April 17, 2024 (Apr 17, 2024 @ 8:43am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!