• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Consistently wrong since 2002

Ah, the different things are different argument.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

You cannot shame the shameless.

Don’t expect peaches from an apple tree.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

Republicans in disarray!

He really is that stupid.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Balloon Juice / Readership Capture / Welcome aboard

Welcome aboard

by DougJ|  February 23, 20118:06 pm| 111 Comments

This post is in: Readership Capture, Ever Get The Feeling You've Been Cheated?

FacebookTweetEmail

Scenes from the class struggle (that’s what this is, isn’t it?) via reader J.

There’s not a reason in the world a pro-life Baptist shouldn’t be a Democrat. We offer policies that reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies, all Republicans offer is legalistic shell-games and fatwas against doctors. We want to keep the government out of their place of worship, Republicans want to turn their religion into a political action committee. And I don’t need to tell you where the two parties stand on social justice, which is the actual focus of the Gospels.

If Jesus were alive, he wouldn’t be taking calls from David Koch.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « All the Pretty Horses
Next Post: We don’t need no education; we don’t need no thought control. »

Reader Interactions

111Comments

  1. 1.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    February 23, 2011 at 8:11 pm

    Is that E.D. Kain?

  2. 2.

    Zifnab25

    February 23, 2011 at 8:11 pm

    Oh, he’d take the call. Cause if he didn’t, the Koch Brothers would drop a few million dollars in ad campaigns and front groups to snuff him out.

  3. 3.

    Opopanax

    February 23, 2011 at 8:11 pm

    A friend of mine who works for a public university in Wisconsin just forwarded an email to me from a colleague about Walker’s union-busting effort. The email contains a Paul Krugman video clip from 2007, and while the whole seven or so minutes is worth watching, the following comment the email highlights (at 6:16) really is kind of shocking: “Last year the highest paid hedge fund manager in the U.S. made an amount equal to the salaries of all 80,000 New York City school teachers for the next three years.” So yes, welcome to the defense of the middle class. Don’t know how to embed video, but you can find it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kwA-CwFK5A&feature=player_embedded

  4. 4.

    gbear

    February 23, 2011 at 8:11 pm

    Jesus takes phone calls all the time.

  5. 5.

    Jude

    February 23, 2011 at 8:12 pm

    That’s a Wisconsin corrections officer. The new Governor pissed all of them off with his bullshit.

    And he’s been there often with that sign. The obverse has Walker as Godzilla destroying things in Wisconsin.

  6. 6.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    February 23, 2011 at 8:14 pm

    Not much of a Christian if he cares more about his cushy union benefits than precious little baby fetuses.

  7. 7.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 8:16 pm

    Just posted this in the past thread, but so much going on that everybody needs a kitteh!

  8. 8.

    PurpleGirl

    February 23, 2011 at 8:16 pm

    “Last year the highest paid hedge fund manager in the U.S. made an amount equal to the salaries of all 80,000 New York City school teachers for the next three years.”

    This is what I don’t think many people can comprehend — the enormity of the amount of money being made and kept by various members of the FIRE sector. They may hear the numbers but the numbers have no meaning, there’s no reference point for them.

  9. 9.

    beltane

    February 23, 2011 at 8:19 pm

    People are OK voting against their self-interest until something happens that makes them wake up and say “Oh shit, these assholes are really out to get me.”

    When the Koch Party shuts down the government there will be millions of more people who come to this realization. It seems that America needs a periodic dunk in the GOP port-a-potty to rouse us out of our amnesia.

  10. 10.

    Sockpuppet

    February 23, 2011 at 8:20 pm

    Jesus wouldn’t be so big on the Democrats either, I’m afraid. Or anybody really.

    Y’all would be calling him an irrational, unserious purist. The dirtiest of dirty fucking hippies, if you will.

  11. 11.

    Violet

    February 23, 2011 at 8:21 pm

    @beltane:
    If the government gets shut down, why will the GOP and the Kochs be blamed? Democrats are in charge of two branches of government, the Senate and the Presidency. Will the average person really blame the Republicans?

  12. 12.

    Baud

    February 23, 2011 at 8:21 pm

    @beltane: Just wish the periods were a little bit longer…

  13. 13.

    Cliff

    February 23, 2011 at 8:22 pm

    I’ve got a idea, how about we pay all these elected people the same salary and benefits as the lowest paid full time state worker.

    Bet they might think twice then.

  14. 14.

    chopper

    February 23, 2011 at 8:23 pm

    @Sockpuppet:

    he was an irrational, unserious purist.

  15. 15.

    beltane

    February 23, 2011 at 8:24 pm

    @Opopanax: And this grossly overpaid hedge fund manager contributed far less to society than a single teacher. At some point people are going to wonder if our country is strong enough to continue laboring under the burden of so much dead weight up at the top of our social pyramid. Corporate media propaganda is very effective, but it is not effective forever. At some point it ceases to work its magic, and that’s when things get interesting.

  16. 16.

    BGinCHI

    February 23, 2011 at 8:24 pm

    If Jesus were alive he’d be holding the Koch Brothers by the ankles and dipping them into a lake of fire.

    I can also see all the smiles of the right wing Christians if Jesus showed up. Which wouldn’t last long as he opened a hole in the ground for them.

    They’d appeal and he’d say, “Did you even read the New Testament? Jesus Christ.”

  17. 17.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 8:25 pm

    @Sockpuppet:

    Jesus wouldn’t be so big on the Democrats either, I’m afraid. Or anybody really.
    __
    Y’all would be calling him an irrational, unserious purist. The dirtiest of dirty fucking hippies, if you will.

    Dude(ette), you really don’t want to go there.

  18. 18.

    xjmueller

    February 23, 2011 at 8:26 pm

    The gospels indicate that JC wuold answer the call but then tell Koch that he’d have to sell everything he owns, give the profits to the poor, and then follow him. Hilarity ensues.

  19. 19.

    Baud

    February 23, 2011 at 8:26 pm

    @Sockpuppet: Speak for yourself. I’m quite confident Jesus would be very fond of me.

  20. 20.

    Pooh

    February 23, 2011 at 8:26 pm

    OT: there is now an ad for scientology at the top of the page…WTF Cole, WTF?

  21. 21.

    Doug Hill

    February 23, 2011 at 8:28 pm

    @Sockpuppet:

    I’ve said before that Jesus was too dirty of a hippie for me. The brother didn’t believe in private property from what I can tell and that’s a bridge too far for me.

  22. 22.

    SteveinSC

    February 23, 2011 at 8:30 pm

    Maybe here’s what has changed his mind:

    33And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.
    34Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:
    35For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
    36Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
    37Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
    38When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
    39Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
    40And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
    41Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
    42For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:
    43I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.
    44Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?
    45Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.
    46And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

  23. 23.

    jl

    February 23, 2011 at 8:30 pm

    @xjmueller: I agree.

    The Big J wouldn’t dip the Koch brother into a lake of fire, but try to turn the convo into a teaching ‘ah-hah’ moment.

    Rather than a bull session on how to destroy the unions and grind the faces of non rich, revealing 110 percent bad faith and hypocrisy quotient.

  24. 24.

    beltane

    February 23, 2011 at 8:30 pm

    @Violet: Yes. The people who gleefully boast about shutting down the government will be blamed for it. I remember the last GOP-caused shutdown when even my wingnut, Limbaugh loving father-in-law came away thinking Newt Gingrich was “a little too extreme”

  25. 25.

    SiubhanDuinne

    February 23, 2011 at 8:31 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:
    SMUUUUUUUUUDGE!!

    Thanks. Been way too long.

  26. 26.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 8:31 pm

    @Doug Hill: Doug Hill, but was that his position? Not sure it was. That’s the problem with sockidiot’s assertion. S/He’s relying on four gospels that have no red text in them in the original Greek, and no verse/chapter designations. According to them, Jesus said some pretty radical things, but some things that would give progressives a heart attack.

    In short, I don’t think anyone should be using JC as their leader on socio/political issues.

  27. 27.

    Doug Hill

    February 23, 2011 at 8:35 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:

    On balance, I found Jesus to be too radical for my tastes.

  28. 28.

    Gravenstone

    February 23, 2011 at 8:39 pm

    Witless Wisconsin Wingnut Wanker Walker (or W^5 for short) making Democratic converts one at a time. Not unlike the Balloon Juice effect, writ large.

  29. 29.

    chopper

    February 23, 2011 at 8:39 pm

    @beltane:

    well, the momentum really changed during the last time shutdown when newtie threw what looked like a temper tantrum over his seat on a plane or some stupid shit. i dunno how it would have worked out without it, but newt really threw the match. i’m assuming the current GOP thinks they can do it better, but one look at the current leadership as well as the teabag caucus makes me think otherwise.

  30. 30.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 8:39 pm

    @Doug Hill: @Doug Hill:
    Understandable. But on balance, I found him to be a mirror of the politico-social ideals of whoever was reading him at the time, esp. when used for purposes of gaining power.

    Recall that the figure himself never wrote a word. everything he said was filtered through at least one person. Think St. Ronnie to the nth degree. That’s why I’m careful when anyone puts JC on their team.

    (spoken as a former seminarian)

  31. 31.

    AkaDad

    February 23, 2011 at 8:39 pm

    The soon-to-be recalled Governor of Wisconsin is about to behold the power of Cheeseheads.

  32. 32.

    Sockpuppet

    February 23, 2011 at 8:40 pm

    @Doug Hill:

    Son, you sayin’ you know better than Our Lord and Savior?

    /sneers, hocks loogie on the floor

    @arguingwithsignposts:

    What the fuck are you even talking about?

  33. 33.

    Violet

    February 23, 2011 at 8:42 pm

    @beltane:
    But didn’t they control both houses of Congress at that time? Two out of three and it’s their fault. But one out of three…I just don’t know.

  34. 34.

    Stillwater

    February 23, 2011 at 8:45 pm

    If fundamentalistprolifechristians are turning against the GOP, there’s hope for us all.

    When are the WaPo bobble heads gonna wax off about republican over-reach (around) and how the country is center left?!?

  35. 35.

    JonathanW

    February 23, 2011 at 8:47 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts: What about Supply Side Jesus?

  36. 36.

    Sixers

    February 23, 2011 at 8:49 pm

    If Jesus were alive he’d be comparing your post to that idiot at the washington post who was speaking for gifford.

    This whole post was a joke.

    “we offer policies that limit tha limit the number of unwanted pregnancies” We sure do and how!

    I’m a pro-choice democrat but don’t need bullshit nuance to make my arguments for why I am.

  37. 37.

    jwb

    February 23, 2011 at 8:49 pm

    @Violet: They also didn’t have effective control of the media like they do now or the ability to drop a gazillion dollars in ads to try to hang the shutdown around the Dems neck. Still, money can’t buy everything, and the Wisconsin thing has gotten out ahead of them, which will make it more difficult (and at the very least make it far more expensive to pull off).

  38. 38.

    Sixers

    February 23, 2011 at 8:49 pm

    If Jesus were alive he’d be comparing your post to that idiot at the washington post who was speaking for gifford.

    This whole post was a joke.

    “we offer policies that limit that limit the number of unwanted pregnancies” We sure do and how!

    I’m a pro-choice democrat but don’t need bullshit nuance to make my arguments for why I am.

  39. 39.

    Evolved Deep Southerner

    February 23, 2011 at 8:50 pm

    @Pooh:

    OT: there is now an ad for scientology at the top of the page…WTF Cole, WTF?

    I think it’s funny as hell, Pooh. Not as funny as the Sarah Palin ads and such as that, but funny. To think that they’re actually giving money to THIS forum? Hi-fucking-larious.

    You go, Cole. Be careful driving back and forth to the bank while laughing so hard. It’s not entirely safe.

  40. 40.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 8:51 pm

    @Sockpuppet:

    What the fuck are you even talking about?

    Go consult some original greek manuscripts and get back with me, sockidiot.

  41. 41.

    Violet

    February 23, 2011 at 8:54 pm

    @jwb:
    Yeah, that’s true. The media can be counted on to be a lapdog for them, full of “both sides say” blandness. But you’re right. The Wisconsin thing has woken people up. I wonder if they can get away with as much when it’s obvious they’ll do anything for David Koch and nothing for the little guy.

  42. 42.

    Sockpuppet

    February 23, 2011 at 8:56 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:

    Is there a reason you think Sockidiot is a particularly effective insult?

    Suckpuppet would be far more poetic. Or perhaps something in a more profane vein? Don’t limit yourself creatively, you’re doing the lord’s work here.

  43. 43.

    The Populist

    February 23, 2011 at 8:57 pm

    @beltane:

    Amen. This is how we had the sixties and the hippie/peace movements. That generation said ENOUGH to all kinds of bullshit. It can and will happen soon enough. I have faith the younguns are watching this bullshit and seeing what the GOP truly stands for and it’s NOT THEM.

  44. 44.

    The Populist

    February 23, 2011 at 9:01 pm

    @Gravenstone:

    I was talking about this when I posted here more regularly. I argued that we should let the right take over again and they never disappoint. Instead of jobs, they worry about the top 1% and their special interest buddies.

    Be careful GOP, a whole generation is watching you. I can see 2012 shaping up to be a beautiful example of democracy winning out over corporate shills.

    Buh bye GOP. Mark my words, the right will lose big in 2012.

  45. 45.

    MikeJ

    February 23, 2011 at 9:01 pm

    @The Populist:

    This is how we had the sixties and the hippie/peace movements.

    So you’re just *trying* to make some of us defect the other way?

  46. 46.

    The Populist

    February 23, 2011 at 9:04 pm

    @Violet:

    I firmly believe that people will see that the GOP is on Fox 24/7 and they gained more seats than anybody in the last election. We can see all this shit started happening once they took control. We don’t need media the way the 20% or so of GOP sheep do. We can find the info and make informed decisions. Many independents will see all this as more overreach by the right.

    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss applies. The right promised to work hard for the people and yet they do NOTHING but talk about anti-abortion bills, repealing health care without a proposal of how to fix it and more social engineering strawman bullshit yet NOTHING about creating good paying AMERICAN Jobs.

    Fuck em. We win again in 2012.

  47. 47.

    The Populist

    February 23, 2011 at 9:05 pm

    @MikeJ:

    Come again? I don’t understand your point.

  48. 48.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 23, 2011 at 9:06 pm

    A new troll? Is it any good?

  49. 49.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 9:06 pm

    @Sockpuppet:

    Suckpuppet would be far more poetic. Or perhaps something in a more profane vein? Don’t limit yourself creatively, you’re doing the lord’s work here.

    Listen, suckidiot (better?), I’m just saying you don’t know WTF you’re talking about. If you want to dig up “scriptures,” I’m a former seminarian who read the original greek and knows more than you about how those “scriptures” came about. I’m also an atheist and former fundamentalist. So when I say “you don’t want to go down that road,” I know whereof I speak, dipshit.

  50. 50.

    Christian Sieber

    February 23, 2011 at 9:06 pm

    Amen to this post, Doug.

  51. 51.

    The Populist

    February 23, 2011 at 9:07 pm

    @MikeJ:

    Okay I think I get your point. Why would I do that. I think the comparisons are pretty clear. What is wrong with a generation that stood up against the bullshit of authoritarian leaders?

    I don’t have a problem with hippies nor do I have a problem with anybody who treats others with respect and can debate the points. I have problems with authoritarians who use power to take away from us middle class folks only to hand it to the rich. Sorry…

  52. 52.

    Sockpuppet

    February 23, 2011 at 9:15 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:

    Who here wants to discuss scriptures, in any language? What color is the sky in your little world? Do you understand where you are right now? Are you stroking out?

    Nobody in this thread gives a shit about Jesus Christ, or anything he said, didn’t say, will say, won’t say, can’t say, or anything in between. That’s why we’re, you know, making fun of him and his followers. Repeatedly.

    But continue on with your Serious Bible Business. In Original Greek, of course.

  53. 53.

    rpmjr

    February 23, 2011 at 9:16 pm

    So much win in this post.
    (Tips hat to DougJarvis Green-Ellis.)

  54. 54.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 9:17 pm

    @Sockpuppet:
    And I quote:

    Jesus wouldn’t be so big on the Democrats either, I’m afraid. Or anybody really.
    __
    Y’all would be calling him an irrational, unserious purist. The dirtiest of dirty fucking hippies, if you will.

    If you want to pull the Jesus card, then be prepared to talk the talk, dipshit. But please continue.

    ETA: “Who here wants to discuss scriptures, in any language?” If you want to discuss the big Jeebus, you have to deal with scriptures, dumbfuck. Otherwise, you’ve got *nothing* – dig?

  55. 55.

    RosiesDad

    February 23, 2011 at 9:21 pm

    It’s a fact that the vast majority of Republican voters pull the lever against their own best interests. So it should come as a huge surprise when one guy wakes up and realizes he’s been screwing himself?

    Wait, isn’t that just what happened to John Cole?

  56. 56.

    Sockpuppet

    February 23, 2011 at 9:23 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:

    You’re seriously offended that I made fun of Democrats and Jesus? That’s what this is about, partisanship and literary scholarship?

    Holy shit.

  57. 57.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 9:27 pm

    @Sockpuppet: No, I’m seriously offended that you don’t know WTF you’re talking about, and yet you’re playing the “both sides do it” card. Dumbass.

  58. 58.

    SteveinSC

    February 23, 2011 at 9:27 pm

    @Sockpuppet: Well I happen to give a shit about what Jesus said. The sentiments attributed to Jesus are surely worth knowing about. How can one understand Western civilization, good as well as bad without knowing something about christianity. Although I am an atheist, I identify with the call to help others and to think of the greater good and the worth of each individual. Maybe liberalism is just christianity without the mumbo-jumbo.

  59. 59.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 23, 2011 at 9:31 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: No, apparently not.

  60. 60.

    magurakurin

    February 23, 2011 at 9:32 pm

    Fuck. The anger in the United States unrelenting. From little corner blogs to city streets to the halls of Congress. I felt the seething anger beginning to rise when I left in ’98 and it seems it has just continued to grow and grow. Now, the country seems to be nothing more than a roiling pot of 300 million pissed off people who bicker and fight about anything, anytime, anywhere. Each summer my yearly visit reveals only more bitterness and more despair and more anger. And each summer I’m happy to see my family and friends, but even happier to know that I don’t have to find a job and try to live and work there anymore.

    smoke pot, smoke pot, everybody smoke, everybody smoke pot, smoke pot smoke pot…..

  61. 61.

    Sockpuppet

    February 23, 2011 at 9:33 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:

    For an alleged atheist, you are shockingly agitated about the misappropriation of political sentiments of a largely fabricated (at minimum) cult leader.

    Who would Mickey Mouse and the Green Arrow support in our two-party politics? Perhaps that’s the real question here.

  62. 62.

    liberal

    February 23, 2011 at 9:34 pm

    @PurpleGirl:

    …the enormity of the amount of money being made stolen and kept by various members of the FIRE sector…

    Fixt.

  63. 63.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 9:37 pm

    @Sockpuppet: Atheism doesn’t mean you abandon all understanding of cultural norms, dumbass. Listen, if you want to go all “Jesus isn’t a democrat” on everyone, then pony up some fuckin’ scripture. I’d expect the same if you were quoting Cartman, dumbass. Fact is, JC’s “words” have enabled a lot more dumbass stuff (starting *way* before the U.S. was even formed) than MM or GA. So if you’re going to argue their ground, you’d better know the territory.

  64. 64.

    liberal

    February 23, 2011 at 9:39 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:

    Recall that the figure himself never wrote a word. everything he said was filtered through at least one person.

    I thought there’s no actual direct evidence whatsoever that there was a historical Jesus. So what figure himself are you referring to?

  65. 65.

    Doug Hill

    February 23, 2011 at 9:40 pm

    @Sockpuppet:

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: if you spend your whole life preaching peace and compassion and get nailed to a cross for doing so, you’d like to think people won’t spend the next 2000 years killing other people in your name. Yeah, it does bother me that people do that, even though I am an atheist/agnostic.

  66. 66.

    liberal

    February 23, 2011 at 9:41 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:

    …and no verse/chapter designations.

    Heh. Just learned this today after seeing something about the Magna Carta for a few minutes on cable.

  67. 67.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 9:45 pm

    @liberal:

    I thought there’s no actual direct evidence whatsoever that there was a historical Jesus. So what figure himself are you referring to?

    actually, i think there’s more evidence of a “historical” jesus than people want to think, but it’s all non-bible, so the church wouldn’t accept it. And he likely wasn’t anything like what he’s been made out to be.
    @Doug Hill: But that’s the problem, if you accept the “scriptural” account, he didn’t preach just peace and acceptance. “I come not to bring peace, but the sword…” There’s a lot of inconsistencies, and that’s before you even delve into the letters of Paul.

  68. 68.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    @liberal: Yes, and it was all in capital letters, too.

  69. 69.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 23, 2011 at 9:49 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:He wasn’t blond, blue-eyed, and always crowned by a halo? Go figure.

  70. 70.

    Another Commenter at Balloon Juice (fka Bella Q)

    February 23, 2011 at 9:56 pm

    Jesus is giving me a headache.

  71. 71.

    Sockpuppet

    February 23, 2011 at 9:58 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:

    Listen, if you want to go all “Jesus isn’t a democrat” on everyone, then pony up some fuckin’ scripture.

    The more you talk, the less idea I have what your issue is.

    Jesus isn’t anything. I called him a stupid hippie purist who doesn’t interface with modern society coherently. You’re right, I’m clearly wielding him as a legitimate political cudgel. For realsies.

    If I said that Jesus sucked dick for coke, would you demand scriptural backing or would that be enough for you to realize I don’t treat him as seriously as you do?

    @Doug Hill:

    I heard he was all about forgiveness and shit. What an insufferable goody two-shoes. Pilate was right.

  72. 72.

    Shoemaker-Levy 9

    February 23, 2011 at 10:12 pm

    social justice, which is the actual focus of the Gospels.

    No. Not remotely true. We need to be clear on something here; social justice is something that (presumably) all of us on this blog agree is a worthy goal, but let’s drop the nonsense about which side the Biblical Jesus was on. What’s abundantly clear from the Biblical account is that what putative Jesus (and Paul) cared most about was the next world, not this one. The truth is that the putative Jesus didn’t particularly care what happened to you on planet Earth. So let’s just stop the nonsense.

  73. 73.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 23, 2011 at 10:23 pm

    @Shoemaker-Levy 9:

    The truth is that the putative Jesus didn’t particularly care what happened to you on planet Earth.

    I have it on good authority that he cares deeply abut Notre Dame football, just not in the way that you would think.

  74. 74.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 23, 2011 at 10:28 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: If FYWP would let me edit, I would fix the typo. FYWP.

  75. 75.

    bago

    February 23, 2011 at 10:40 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts: I am reading this in the voice of Samuel L. Jackson, and it’s fairly awesome.

  76. 76.

    General Stuck

    February 23, 2011 at 10:43 pm

    @Doug Hill:

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: if you spend your whole life preaching peace and compassion and get nailed to a cross for doing so, you’d like to think people won’t spend the next 2000 years killing other people in your name.

    This is certainly true, but people were killing each other before Jesus, just in some other name, or just for the hell of it. I don’t believe the account of him in the bible, but the red line stuff he supposedly spoke, was some pretty cool stuff to live by, by and large.

    And really whose to say, that just as many people didn’t kill other people in his name, that would have otherwise for some stupid reason, or no reason at all. It is impossible to prove a negative, but I like to think the number is significant. The problem isn’t just religion, or mostly religion, it is sorry mankind, or part of them that use the bible and other religious text to justify, or organize, or whatever, to do things that usually are directly anti thetical to the teachings of Christ, or Mohammed for that matter.

    There has been a lot of evil wrought in the name of religion over the millenia, but there has been a lot of good also. How it balances out no one can know.

    Personally, I like the Thomas account of a new age like Jesus with a more metaphysical deist take on things. Of course, that’s gnostic and heretical. Must have been fucking wingnuts choosing which Apostle to go with.

  77. 77.

    RosiesDad

    February 23, 2011 at 10:45 pm

    I stood with a friend in the courtyard outside the Church of the Flagellation in the Old City of Jerusalem a few summers ago and my friend (who was raised Catholic) turned to me and asked whimsically, “How did Jesus get to Italy?”

    “Alitalia” I answered.

  78. 78.

    General Stuck

    February 23, 2011 at 10:45 pm

    Damn, the edit is down, that should be who has, instead of whose. hillbilly grammar, what you gonna do.

  79. 79.

    James E Powell

    February 23, 2011 at 11:01 pm

    @beltane:

    It seems that America needs a periodic dunk in the GOP port-a-potty to rouse us out of our amnesia.

    I am not sanguine about this. Eight years in the Bush/Cheney port-a-potty apparently did not convince anyone that voting Republican only helps the rich.

  80. 80.

    hamletta

    February 23, 2011 at 11:02 pm

    @Shoemaker-Levy 9: I agree.

    @arguingwithsignposts, @Sockpuppet, y’all seem to agree with each other more than I think you realize; you’re just talking past each other.

    Resolved: No one can claim to be Team Jesus!

  81. 81.

    t

    February 23, 2011 at 11:16 pm

    @gbear:

    +1

  82. 82.

    Cliff

    February 23, 2011 at 11:22 pm

    @bago:

    Oh Hell Yea!!

    Nailed it.

  83. 83.

    Mnemosyne

    February 23, 2011 at 11:27 pm

    @liberal:

    I always think the whole “there was no such historical person as Jesus!” argument is probably the weakest one in the atheist arsenal. If that’s your criterion, then Islam, Buddhism and Scientology must all be true because we know for sure that an actual historical person is behind each of them.

    There’s pretty good evidence that the figure of Jesus in the Bible can be traced to an actual historical person (one of the many itinerant rabbis roaming Judea around that time). But even if he existed, that still doesn’t prove he was the son of God.

  84. 84.

    Suck It Up!

    February 23, 2011 at 11:34 pm

    @arguingwithsignposts:

    nah, actually the purists would be calling Jesus a pussy because he’s always forgiving and breaking bread with his foes. Then they’d call him stupid and naive for thinking his enemies can change.

  85. 85.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 23, 2011 at 11:43 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    But even if he existed, that still doesn’t prove he was the son of God.

    I may have this wrong, but isn’t the son of God stuff the part that is supposed to be a matter of faith?

  86. 86.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 11:51 pm

    @Suck It Up!:

    actually the purists would be calling Jesus a pussy because he’s always forgiving and breaking bread with his foes. Then they’d call him stupid and naive for thinking his enemies can change.

    Except that’s not what they do. They – I’m lookin’ at you James Fuckin’ Dobson – wrap themselves in his cloak and claim he’s saying something else. Team Jesus ain’t none of us. We don’t *know* him, we don’t walk in his fuckin’ shoes. The closest we’ve got is “Life of Brian.” And anyone who can claim to speak for his ass can jump off the pier.

    There, I said it. I’m goin to bed.

  87. 87.

    arguingwithsignposts

    February 23, 2011 at 11:52 pm

    Why am i awaiting moderation? FYWP!

  88. 88.

    bob_is_boring

    February 24, 2011 at 12:09 am

    Scenes from the class struggle (that’s what this is, isn’t it?)

    Fuck and yes.

    There are only two sides to this fight; if the result is for gentlemen like the one in the picture to vote for their socioeconomic interests, it’s a massive win.

  89. 89.

    Mnemosyne

    February 24, 2011 at 12:18 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    Well, yeah, but that’s not the point I was making. The point I was making is that quite a few atheists seem to build their disbelief on the claim that there was no historical person as Jesus. That seems like a pretty shaky foundation since by definition you’d have to change your mind and become a believer if some kind of definitive proof that he existed turned up. It would also seem to imply that their only barrier to believing is not thinking that Jesus was a real person, which makes me wonder why they’re not Scientologists if that’s their criterion.

  90. 90.

    Nellcote

    February 24, 2011 at 1:25 am

    Jesus loves me, he just doesn’t want me for a sunbeam.

  91. 91.

    cheesegrits

    February 24, 2011 at 1:33 am

    @mnemosyne – where on earth do you get the idea that atheists build their disbelief on the existence or non existence of Jesus?

    You may want to sit down for this bit, as this may come as a bit of a shock. Christianity is not the only religion / God atheists don’t believe in. There’s a whole WORLD full of religions, Gods and Prophets we don’t believe in. In my case, probably because I wasn’t raised in a religious family. I’m perfectly willing to accept that jesus was a real person, I just don’t believe he was the Son of God, brought into this world through the Immaculate Conception. he was just another crazy prophet, one of many,

    And personally, I’ve never had a Road To Damascus Moment. God has never spoken to me in some blinding flash of light. All I see is a whole bunch of religions, each claiming to worship the One True God, running around starting wars, telling everyone else how they should run their lives as if they have some exclusive claim on morality and decency, and generally making life fairly intolerable for the rest of us.

    I’m still perfectly open minded, and quite willing to believe if I ever come across anything that makes me believe … but I suspect my neural patterning has solidified over time, and I’m no longer susceptible to the tranmissable meme of religion.

    — hugh

  92. 92.

    Zuzu's Petals

    February 24, 2011 at 1:52 am

    @gbear:

    Jesus is on the Main Line.

  93. 93.

    Zuzu's Petals

    February 24, 2011 at 2:00 am

    @Opopanax:

    Well, he was a little off but it’s still pretty shocking:

    Combined, the top 25 hedge fund managers last year [2006] earned $14 billion — enough to pay New York City’s 80,000 public school teachers for nearly three years.

  94. 94.

    Opopanax

    February 24, 2011 at 9:03 am

    @Zuzu’s Petals: Thanks for the correction, ZP, and yes, the income disparity is still pretty breathtaking.

  95. 95.

    Paul in KY

    February 24, 2011 at 11:29 am

    @arguingwithsignposts: I think Jesus can be used to great effect against the fundies. Jesus has all sorts of quotes in the Gospels about helping the poor, being meek, against hypocricy, etc.

    Whether or not YOU believe in JC, they claim to believe in him & thus you can hit them with various bible quotes that are the antitheses of modern Republican thought.

    At the least, it’s fun to make them sputter & rage.

  96. 96.

    Paul in KY

    February 24, 2011 at 12:13 pm

    @magurakurin: Right on, brother. 4/20 every day.

  97. 97.

    Smurfhole

    February 24, 2011 at 1:00 pm

    @Shoemaker-Levy 9:

    No. Not remotely true. We need to be clear on something here; social justice is something that (presumably) all of us on this blog agree is a worthy goal, but let’s drop the nonsense about which side the Biblical Jesus was on. What’s abundantly clear from the Biblical account is that what putative Jesus (and Paul) cared most about was the next world, not this one. The truth is that the putative Jesus didn’t particularly care what happened to you on planet Earth. So let’s just stop the nonsense.

    Could you please quote the part in the Gospels where Jesus said that what happens in this world is of no relevance whatsoever? I seem to remember a number of places where the importance of proper behavior in this world was discussed, and a number of places where behavior matching modern criteria for social justice was specifically advocated. I can remember places where Jesus said or implied that this world itself wasn’t important, but I can’t remember reading any place where Jesus said that how we act in this world was of no importance. Where was that?

  98. 98.

    Paul in KY

    February 24, 2011 at 1:39 pm

    @Smurfhole: I agree, would Jesus have said ‘render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s’ if this world was of no concern?

  99. 99.

    Shoemaker-Levy 9

    February 24, 2011 at 4:09 pm

    @Smurfhole:

    Could you please quote the part in the Gospels where Jesus said that what happens in this world is of no relevance whatsoever?

    There would be no point because that wasn’t what was being discussed. Doug said that social justice was the “focus” of the Gospels, and that is not remotely true.

    proper behavior

    …is another issue. What we’re discussing is whether social justice is the “focus” of the text, which it is not.

    I can’t remember reading any place where Jesus said that how we act in this world was of no importance.

    Again irrelevant, since I’m not saying any such thing.

    Read the Beatitudes, which as much as say that the worse it is for you on Earth the better it will be in Heaven. Also note that the divinity of Jesus is asserted from the very beginning, so that he could have waved his magic wand and created universal social justice at any time if he’d cared to. It’s true he performed a few random healings and resurrected Lazarus, but considering the massive injustice and cruelty of the reigning authorities it seems like the least you could expect of a deity, and in fact these episodes are included more to demonstrate his divinity than anything else. And of course, it’s all culminated by the Passion and Crucifixion, the whole point of which is to say that no matter how crappy it is on Earth at least you’ve got Heaven to look forward to.

    That’s not to say that you can’t pick out passages that suggest social justice here on Earth. If there’s anything the Bible has shown us over the centuries it’s that you can claim just about anything as a doctrine if you do enough cherry-picking. But to say that social justice is the “focus” of the story is simply not true.

  100. 100.

    Shoemaker-Levy 9

    February 24, 2011 at 4:15 pm

    @Paul in KY:

    Er, read the whole passage. “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” In context he’s saying that the taxes you pay to the cruel and unjust authorities aren’t very important, what’s important is that you are right with God.

  101. 101.

    Smurfhole

    February 24, 2011 at 5:41 pm

    @Shoemaker-Levy 9:

    You really haven’t met your burden, then. I did enjoy the judo effort to say that people who cite discussions of social justice are “cherry-picking,” though. I asked where Jesus said that this world didn’t matter. You’ve got nothing other than the sections that say Jesus was divine, which you then use to argue that Jesus could’ve created total social justice with the wave of a magic wand (although I’d be interested in hearing how this was supposed to happen without destroying free will, or how that wasn’t part of the point of the whole Second Coming).

    I don’t think anyone here was arguing that Jesus was some kind of ancient atheist Communist militant who only cared about social justice and didn’t have any mystical aspect whatsoever. But it’s very clear that social justice was a factor. I’m still waiting for you to come up with some evidence that Jesus “didn’t care what happened to you on planet Earth.” You can call it “cherry-picking” because it contradicts you, if you want; but clearly, there’s a great deal of evidence that this was something Jesus cared about.

    Or, hey, let’s look at those Beatitudes: “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Earth.” And on it goes.

  102. 102.

    Shoemaker-Levy 9

    February 24, 2011 at 7:22 pm

    @Smurfhole:

    You really haven’t met your burden, then. I did enjoy the judo effort to say that people who cite discussions of social justice are “cherry-picking,” though. I asked where Jesus said that this world didn’t matter. You’ve got nothing other than the sections that say Jesus was divine,

    Oy. Serious question: have you read the Gospels? I mean, the whole things? There are no “sections that say Jesus was divine,” that thesis is presumed throughout. One more time: that is the organizing thesis. Hence…

    you then use to argue that Jesus could’ve created total social justice with the wave of a magic wand

    There’s no argument needed, Jesus explicitly states that he can do anything if he chooses to.

    although I’d be interested in hearing how this was supposed to happen without destroying free will

    Whoa, now we’re discussing free will? Leaving aside your implication that free will and a just society are somehow incompatible, let’s please try to stay focused on the original question.

    or how that wasn’t part of the point of the whole Second Coming

    Christ.

    Yes, as I’ve been saying from the start, Jesus was focused on the next world, not this one. Jesus promises that perfect justice will exist after he makes it all happen for us at some unspecified future date. After all, “ye have the poor always with you.” Hence, the focus is not on this world but on making oneself right with God and getting into the next one.

    I don’t think anyone here was arguing that Jesus was some kind of ancient atheist Communist militant who only cared about social justice

    Doug’s original statement was that social justice was the “focus of the Gospels,” which you may recall is the statement I’ve been arguing against throughout.

    But it’s very clear that social justice was a factor.

    What’s very clear is that getting oneself into the next world by following certain steps is a “factor”. As an example, Jesus tells the rich young man in Matthew 19 to give his wealth to the poor. The reason is not to create a more just society — why would it be, when just a few chapters later Jesus says that society will collapse in the near future — the reason is to get the rich young man into Heavenby eliminating that which stands between him and God.

    I’m still waiting for you to come up with some evidence that Jesus “didn’t care what happened to you on planet Earth.”

    The actual quote is “particularly care”. And in truth the text is somewhat contradictory on this point. There are instances where he takes pity on people and performs miracles for them, other instances where he seems indifferent to present suffering (the anointment at Bethany, for instance). You’ll have to ask devout Christians how the reconcile these things, what’s clear to a more objective observer is that “social justice” is not the “focus” of the text. And please don’t forget, that last is what we’re talking about.

    You can call it “cherry-picking”

    Because that’s exactly what it is. You can posit that Jesus was for redistribution of wealth if you pick out the right verses. You can also posit that he was bent on starting wars and breaking up families. You could posit that he considered his feet more important than widows and orphans. You can posit lots of things about Jesus if you cherry-pick, but there are only a few consistent organizing principles. Namely, that Jesus was a divine figure who conquered death, offering a way to a better world. Frankly, the “actual focus of the Gospels” is Jesus himself and his wonderful next world, our human problems are a distant second.

  103. 103.

    PanurgeATL

    February 24, 2011 at 8:29 pm

    @The Populist:

    But look at the stories we keep telling ourselves about that time. “That generation said ENOUGH…” and then lost heart or got distracted or lost their souls or whatever. We don’t acknowledge the distance that was traveled. Why would anyone take after them when our own side (well, not me, of course) keeps dumping on them?

  104. 104.

    Asshole

    February 24, 2011 at 11:30 pm

    @Shoemaker-Levy 9:

    Oy. Serious question: have you read the Gospels? I mean, the whole things?

    Why, yes. Several times, in various English translations. Once in the koine Greek, but that was back in college.

    There are no “sections that say Jesus was divine,” that thesis is presumed throughout. One more time: that is the organizing thesis.

    It’s only explicitly stated in certain portions of the text. In the Gospel of Mark, it’s treated almost like a whodunit that only the non-Jews in the story get. Even Peter fucks it up.

    There’s no argument needed, Jesus explicitly states that he can do anything if he chooses to.

    I found your use of imagery unnecessarily derogatory if we’re going on the premise that Jesus is, in fact, God. Not the Tooth Fairy. You know, the premise that you just argued we should go on for purposes of analysis of the Gospels.

    Whoa, now we’re discussing free will? Leaving aside your implication that free will and a just society are somehow incompatible, let’s please try to stay focused on the original question.

    No, because you changed the question by denigrating Christ’s apparent inability to wave a magic wand and create a just society. I’m saying to you that such a society would break down very quickly. It would break down because of free will, because it’s inherently impossible to have a fully just society in a world full of selfish, self-centered monkeys. I didn’t think one needed to agree with Jesus about much else to see this. The only people who’d disagree are utopians, and none of their visions have brought forth much of value when we’ve tried to enact their societies.

    I realize it’s a tangent, but your tendencies of simultaneously belittle the text while demanding that we rigorously adhere to the text AND while, yourself, essentially quoting none of the text, is extremely annoying.

    Yes, as I’ve been saying from the start, Jesus was focused on the next world, not this one.

    The second coming is this world. It’s Jesus coming back to this planet. It’s supposed to happen any day now, in fact. Could be tomorrow, could be 2012, could be 3012. But it’s coming soon, according to Jesus.

    Jesus promises that perfect justice will exist after he makes it all happen for us at some unspecified future date. After all, “ye have the poor always with you.” Hence, the focus is not on this world but on making oneself right with God and getting into the next one.

    Doug’s original statement was that social justice was the “focus of the Gospels,” which you may recall is the statement I’ve been arguing against throughout.

    It was, in terms of how we’re actually supposed to behave. Or you can read the Epistles, where the Apostles- those guys who hung out with Jesus, and told us about Jesus, and 11 out of 12 of whom were executed by the Romans for talking about Jesus- said the same thing.

    Religion that is pure and undefiled before God and the Father is this: to care for orphans and widows in their affliction and to keep oneself unstained by the world.

    James 1:27.

    What’s very clear is that getting oneself into the next world by following certain steps is a “factor”. As an example, Jesus tells the rich young man in Matthew 19 to give his wealth to the poor. The reason is not to create a more just society—why would it be, when just a few chapters later Jesus says that society will collapse in the near future—the reason is to get the rich young man into Heaven by eliminating that which stands between him and God.

    Sure, that’s one way of looking at it. But another way of looking at it is to say that the fixation on onesself and the disregard of one’s fellow-sufferers is the greatest obstacle to salvation. In other words, the failure to focus on social justice. Doug’s take on it is just as valid as yours, which is why I disagreed with you in the first place. You have yet to prove him wrong.

    The actual quote is “particularly care”. And in truth the text is somewhat contradictory on this point. There are instances where he takes pity on people and performs miracles for them, other instances where he seems indifferent to present suffering (the anointment at Bethany, for instance).

    In the Gospel of John, it’s pointed out that Judas was whining about the anointment because he was embezzling from the poor-box.

    Six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany, where Laz’arus was, whom Jesus had raised from the dead. 2 There they made him a supper; Martha served, and Laz’arus was one of those at table with him. 3 Mary took a pound of costly ointment of pure nard and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped his feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the ointment. 4 But Judas Iscariot, one of his disciples (he who was to betray him), said, 5 “Why was this ointment not sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor?” 6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor but because he was a thief, and as he had the money box he used to take what was put into it. 7 Jesus said, “Let her alone, let her keep it for the day of my burial. 8 The poor you always have with you, but you do not always have me.” 9 When the great crowd of the Jews learned that he was there, they came, not only on account of Jesus but also to see Laz’arus, whom he had raised from the dead. 10 So the chief priests planned to put Laz’arus also to death, 11 because on account of him many of the Jews were going away and believing in Jesus.

    You’ll have to ask devout Christians how the reconcile these things, what’s clear to a more objective observer is that “social justice” is not the “focus” of the text. And please don’t forget, that last is what we’re talking about.

    I have a feeling that there are about as many devout Christian ways to take the Bible as there are non-Christian ways to take the Bible. Or anything else, for that matter.

    For example, some might say that Jesus cares deeply about social justice, but that humanity falls short of enacting it. (“The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.”) And that because of this failure even when exposed to Christ, death and resurrection become necessary. One might argue that Christ’s mission of social justice was thwarted by the ingratitude and selfishness of humanity itself, thus making the Passion necessary despite Christ’s human efforts to avert it.

    One might also argue that Christ thought faith would save us, but that faith needed to be demonstrated by social works which are tantamount to social justice. That faith, without works, is dead.

    One might even look at Matthew 22:36-40 and say that Christ is arguing that the way we treat one another is exactly as important as believing in God, if not functionally identical:

    36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”

    37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

    Those are only a few of many, many possible ways of reconciling the texts and arguing that social justice is the main focus of Christ’s teachings to humanity. I’m not advocating for them specifically, merely mentioning that for hundreds of years, some of the people who’ve devoted their lives to reading the Bible have advocated for them.

    And ultimately, what we’re talking about is why you think that (among others) Doug, the entire Liberation Theology movement of the Catholic Church, and St. James are all completely wrong. I think their interpretation is just as valid as yours.

    Because that’s exactly what it is. You can posit that Jesus was for redistribution of wealth if you pick out the right verses.

    I’d have a hard time finding verses that showed otherwise, frankly. As pointed out above, the passage about the poor always being with us could be interpreted as a rebuke to the embezzlement of Judas (admittedly, that’s not in the synoptic Gospels, but for purposes of textual analysis all 4 texts are viewed as equally valid so a factoid omitted from the synoptics but mentioned by John is of equal validity).

    You can also posit that he was bent on starting wars and breaking up families.

    Sure, if you’re an idiot. The passage in question is clearly referring to the disputes that arise among people when the subject of Christianity comes up. It’s not advocacy, merely an extremely accurate prediction of the subsequent history of Christianity. In the context of Matthew 10, the quote is clearly a reference to the fact that the Apostles will witness and experience persecution advocating for Jesus. If we need to break the entire chapter down line by line, we can do this. Hell, if I have time tomorrow or this weekend I’ll try to find it in the Greek and see how much of that I can remember. I care about this, because I think it’s one of the stupidest, laziest arguments against Christ out there. Better arguments need to be made than ones based on sheer laziness.

    You could posit that he considered his feet more important than widows and orphans.

    Again, if you were an idiot or a sophist. I think the social justice suffuses the Gospels and the Epistles. It’s not a question of lazily taking one quote and skewing it out of context; it’s a valid interpretation of reams of text.

    You can posit lots of things about Jesus if you cherry-pick, but there are only a few consistent organizing principles. Namely, that Jesus was a divine figure who conquered death, offering a way to a better world. Frankly, the “actual focus of the Gospels” is Jesus himself and his wonderful next world, our human problems are a distant second.

    This reminds me of a fun quote I read on this blog a while back, in the context of one of these other interminably annoying Bible-bashing threads. I wish I could remember who said it, but I can’t: “The only thing more annoying than having fundamentalist Christians tell you there’s only one way to read the Bible is having militant atheists tell you there’s only one way to read the Bible.”

    There are lots and lots of different ways to read the text. Your way isn’t the only one. Hundreds of theologians and Christian dogmatists and even atheist/agnostics like Doug have read it and disagreed with you. Unless you’re the single smartest man who ever read the Bible, and you know more about Christianity than guys like James who personally gave their lives for the early Church, I’m going to have to say that you’re entitled to your interpretation of the text but that others’ interpretations on this specific point seem to have enough textual backing to match you in questions of fundamental validity.

  105. 105.

    Paul in KY

    February 25, 2011 at 8:05 am

    @Shoemaker-Levy 9: But he’s certainly talking about the secular part of the world there, isn’t he?

  106. 106.

    Paul in KY

    February 25, 2011 at 8:08 am

    @Asshole: Wow, that was a Greenwaldian length post!

  107. 107.

    Smurfhole

    February 25, 2011 at 8:49 am

    Thank you! (I’m Asshole, too, depends on which computer I’m on.)

  108. 108.

    Shoemaker-Levy 9

    February 25, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    @Asshole:

    In the Gospel of Mark, [Jesus’ divinity is] treated almost like a whodunit that only the non-Jews in the story get.

    What’s the very first sentence of the Gospel of Mark? What’s the very first narrative event of the Gospel of Mark?

    What is the very first sentence of the Gospel of John? What are the first narrative events of the Gospels of Matthew and Luke?

    I found your use of imagery unnecessarily derogatory

    Says “Asshole”…

    if we’re going on the premise that Jesus is, in fact, God.

    Since we’re talking about the Gospels, and since the very first sentences and/or narrative events of all four Gospels establish the divinity of Jesus (for the purposes of our discussion I’m sticking with the word “divinity”), what other premise would we go on?

    No, because you changed the question by denigrating Christ’s apparent inability to wave a magic wand

    I did no such thing. In fact, I explicitly stated the opposite, that Christ could wave a magic wand (figuratively speaking) at any time. Can you read? Since you persist in arguing points I never made is there a point in going on?

    your tendencies of simultaneously belittle the text while demanding that we rigorously adhere to the text

    Are you insane? For the purposes of the discussion I’ve accepted the text at face value, which is the only logical thing to do given that I was responding to what the OP says is in the text. In no way did I ever “belittle” the text, unless you think pointing out some of the obvious contradictions, which liberal Christians will readily admit are there, is “belittling”. Maybe you’re upset that I threw the “magic wand” metaphor into it. You’ll get over it.

    AND while, yourself, essentially quoting none of the text

    Now you’re just lying. Since you can’t get the most basic facts about the Gospels correct, and now are simply lying, there’s no point in going on.

  109. 109.

    Shoemaker-Levy 9

    February 25, 2011 at 1:18 pm

    @Paul in KY:

    Who cares, that wasn’t the question under consideration.

  110. 110.

    Asshole

    February 25, 2011 at 6:05 pm

    @Shoemaker-Levy 9:

    I think we should swap handles.

  111. 111.

    Asshole

    February 25, 2011 at 6:07 pm

    And to reiterate, the only thing more annoying than having a fundamentalist Christian tell you there’s only one way to read the Bible is to have an atheist tell you there’s only one way to read the Bible.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • WaterGirl on Friday Open Thread (Point and Laugh) (Jun 9, 2023 @ 2:55pm)
  • Omnes Omnibus on You Gotta Give Trump This- He’s An Achiever (Jun 9, 2023 @ 2:55pm)
  • Alison Rose on You Gotta Give Trump This- He’s An Achiever (Jun 9, 2023 @ 2:55pm)
  • Jerzy Russian on You Gotta Give Trump This- He’s An Achiever (Jun 9, 2023 @ 2:55pm)
  • Jackie on You Gotta Give Trump This- He’s An Achiever (Jun 9, 2023 @ 2:54pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!