• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

This fight is for everything.

This really is a full service blog.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

This chaos was totally avoidable.

If you don’t believe freedom is for everybody, then the thing you love isn’t freedom, it is privilege.

Republicans: slavery is when you own me. freedom is when I own you.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

They want us to be overwhelmed and exhausted. Focus. Resist. Oppose.

The fight for our country is always worth it. ~Kamala Harris

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

“Just close your eyes and kiss the girl and go where the tilt-a-whirl takes you.” ~OzarkHillbilly

Oppose, oppose, oppose. do not congratulate. this is not business as usual.

If you thought you’d already seen people saying the stupidest things possible on the internet, prepare yourselves.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the gop

When they say they are pro-life, they do not mean yours.

Cancel the cowardly Times and Post and set up an equivalent monthly donation to ProPublica.

“In this country American means white. everybody else has to hyphenate.”

My right to basic bodily autonomy is not on the table. that’s the new deal.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / The Contribute More Fallacy

The Contribute More Fallacy

by John Cole|  February 24, 20115:12 pm| 50 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Our Failed Media Experiment

FacebookTweetEmail

An excellent piece by David Cay Johnston that shows how corrupted our current debate is, and how well right-wingers have co-opted the language so that it is more favorable towards their goals:

Economic nonsense is being reported as fact in most of the news reports on the Wisconsin dispute, the product of a breakdown of skepticism among journalists multiplied by their lack of understanding of basic economic principles.

Gov. Scott Walker says he wants state workers covered by collective bargaining agreements to “contribute more” to their pension and health insurance plans.

Accepting Gov. Walker’ s assertions as fact, and failing to check, created the impression that somehow the workers are getting something extra, a gift from taxpayers. They are not.

Out of every dollar that funds Wisconsin’ s pension and health insurance plans for state workers, 100 cents comes from the state workers.

How can that be? Because the “contributions” consist of money that employees chose to take as deferred wages – as pensions when they retire – rather than take immediately in cash. The same is true with the health care plan. If this were not so a serious crime would be taking place, the gift of public funds rather than payment for services.

Thus, state workers are not being asked to simply “contribute more” to Wisconsin’ s retirement system (or as the argument goes, “pay their fair share” of retirement costs as do employees in Wisconsin’ s private sector who still have pensions and health insurance). They are being asked to accept a cut in their salaries so that the state of Wisconsin can use the money to fill the hole left by tax cuts and reduced audits of corporations in Wisconsin.

The labor agreements show that the pension plan money is part of the total negotiated compensation. The key phrase, in those agreements I read (emphasis added), is: “The Employer shall contribute on behalf of the employee.” This shows that this is just divvying up the total compensation package, so much for cash wages, so much for paid vacations, so much for retirement, etc.

This is an excellent point- they are not being asked to “contribute more,” they are taking a salary cut in deferred wages.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread: Show the Monster
Next Post: Update from New Zealand »

Reader Interactions

50Comments

  1. 1.

    Violet

    February 24, 2011 at 5:16 pm

    Accepting Gov. Walker’s anyone’s assertions as fact, and failing to check,

    Fixed to describe how the media generally operates. They take lots of people’s assertions as fact. Probably not 100%, since there’s likely some issue where some actual reporting broke out on one occasion, but largely this is how they operate.

  2. 2.

    freelancer

    February 24, 2011 at 5:18 pm

    Punchy’s schtick today is as amusing as it is annoying.

    Wait for it…

  3. 3.

    BruinKid

    February 24, 2011 at 5:18 pm

    Have you seen this? An affidavit reveals that it was none other than Roger Ailes himself that told Judith Regan to lie to federal investigators about her affair with Bernard Kerik.

    But Ms. Regan never revealed the identity of the executive, even as her allegation made headlines and she brought a wrongful termination suit against HarperCollins and News Corporation.

    But now, affidavits filed in a separate lawsuit reveal the identity of the previously unnamed executive: Roger E. Ailes, chairman of Fox News.

    What is more, the documents say that Ms. Regan taped the telephone call from Mr. Ailes in which Mr. Ailes discusses her relationship with Mr. Kerik.

    It is unclear whether the existence of the tape played a role in News Corporation’s decision to move quickly to settle Ms. Regan’s lawsuit, paying her $10.75 million in a confidential settlement reached two months after she filed it in 2007.

  4. 4.

    BruinKid

    February 24, 2011 at 5:20 pm

    Argh. How do you quote multiple paragraphs again?

  5. 5.

    R-Jud

    February 24, 2011 at 5:21 pm

    Cole. I am lazy and drunk. Can I get a link to the whole piece cited in your post, please?

  6. 6.

    freelancer

    February 24, 2011 at 5:22 pm

    @BruinKid:

    Two underscores _ between each ‘graf.

  7. 7.

    Bulworth

    February 24, 2011 at 5:23 pm

    I’m a little confused about this.

    First there is this:

    Out of every dollar that funds Wisconsin’ s pension and health insurance plans for state workers, 100 cents comes from the state workers.

    then there is this

    “The Employer shall contribute on behalf of the employee.” This shows that this is just divvying up the total compensation package, so much for cash wages, so much for paid vacations, so much for retirement, etc.

    This latter ‘graph sounds like there is an employer contribution…?

  8. 8.

    Violet

    February 24, 2011 at 5:25 pm

    @R-Jud:
    Here’s a link to the article quoted.

  9. 9.

    Tom Q

    February 24, 2011 at 5:25 pm

    I agree that this is misleading language which, as usual, helps make the right-wing argument look better.

    But I’m guessing most of the people against the union position wouldn’t be swayed even if it were phrased correctly. To them, it will simply be, “I have to pay more for my medical insurance than I did last year (or 2/5/10 years ago), and so should they”.

  10. 10.

    Violet

    February 24, 2011 at 5:28 pm

    @Bulworth:
    No, the “on behalf” part means they’re just operating as the intermediary and doing the actual contributing of the money. The money itself comes from the employee. Like if I gave you some cash and a deposit slip filled out for my checking account, and you went to the bank and deposited it on my behalf. That’s how it’s working here.

  11. 11.

    Bulworth

    February 24, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    @Violet: OK, I thought it might be that.

  12. 12.

    Bulworth

    February 24, 2011 at 5:31 pm

    @Violet: although it’s surprising there’s no matching contributions by the state.

  13. 13.

    General Stuck

    February 24, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    Layered bullshit, cooked up in the bowels of Heritage Foundation and AEI. The slow con on afterburners. Dress up taking something that is not theirs, from workers cloaked in patriotic jingoisms of “contributing more”, to dress up taking away bargaining rates in service to shared sacrifice from immediate economic emergencies with the bullseye to defund the dem party pol machine, and the middle class pol power. In a bill also chocked full of various wingnut welfare party favors.

    This is no Trojan Horse, this is burglary from men in elephant suits.

  14. 14.

    Amir_Khalid

    February 24, 2011 at 5:39 pm

    @Violet: Deadline pressure is partly to blame. You’ve got an editor constantly breathing down your neck for the story. And nowadays a newspaper doesn’t just print stories for the morning edition any more. It tweets the thing, puts it up on the website ASAP, all while competing with other news outlets to be the first.

    The concept of a daily news cycle has become a relic of a more slow-moving age. Unfortunately, that’s how haste has become a primary value in news these days. Sometimes more so than accuracy or context.

  15. 15.

    Bulworth

    February 24, 2011 at 5:42 pm

    @General Stuck: as was reported I think by this very webtubes blog, the person running Wisconsin’s health and welfare department is someone from Heritage. Go figure.

  16. 16.

    General Stuck

    February 24, 2011 at 5:42 pm

    Cripes, no edit function. That is not terrible grammar and spelling in my post, it is code, and secret.

  17. 17.

    khead

    February 24, 2011 at 5:47 pm

    @R-Jud:

    I feel like this should be my post but it’s just too early.

  18. 18.

    Violet

    February 24, 2011 at 5:48 pm

    @Amir_Khalid:
    Yeah, I get that. And I understand all the pressures. But it still doesn’t make it right that something is reported as “fact” without being checked.

  19. 19.

    General Stuck

    February 24, 2011 at 5:54 pm

    @Bulworth:

    AKA – The Institute of Fleecing Research

  20. 20.

    Uncle Clarence Thomas

    February 24, 2011 at 5:59 pm

    .
    .
    Fortunately, President Obama will soon be making a fierce, historic speech somewhere in Wisconsin in solidarity with America’s middle and working classes against the depraved fat cat Republican war on them.
    .
    .

  21. 21.

    BruinKid

    February 24, 2011 at 6:00 pm

    @freelancer: Ah, thanks. It’s been a while since I quoted more than one paragraph here.

  22. 22.

    Lukeness

    February 24, 2011 at 6:02 pm

    They’re not just “taking a salary cut in their deferred wages,” but also in their current compensation as more of that will be required to be contributed to the pension fund.

  23. 23.

    R-Jud

    February 24, 2011 at 6:13 pm

    @khead: It’s 11 pm where I live. Maybe I am you, from the future?

    Also, thanks, Violet, for the full link.

  24. 24.

    cyntax

    February 24, 2011 at 6:14 pm

    @Violet:

    Fixed to describe how the media generally operates. They take lots of people’s assertions as fact.

    Only “serious” people it seems are entitled to have their facts non-checked. I was just reading over at the GOS (don’t like that site redesign) that none of the Sunday talkshows will have anyone from labor on. So as long as you’re supporting the top .1%, you’ll get airtime; otherwise, not so much.

  25. 25.

    Sko Hayes

    February 24, 2011 at 6:23 pm

    This kind of goes along with what David Waldman said over at the GOS earlier today:

    Public sector unions, Walker’s theory goes, must be smashed because they “lobby” the government to pay their members more, and then their members use their pay to kick in dues, which are used to “lobby” for even more money. That’s precisely the argument Republicans used against liberal-leaning interest groups in the 1990s. Almost verbatim. But what makes the theory so dangerous is that following its logic, every dollar a public sector employee is paid is and always remains “taxpayer money.” Just as in H.R. 3, where tax deductions granted to offsetting the cost of buying insurance coverage become “fungible” and therefore turn every dollar in your wallet forever into “taxpayer money,” so that Republicans can forbid you from using even money every normal American thought of as your own to pay for insurance plans that cover abortion.

    Of course, no one ever suggests that Blackwater’s money is “taxpayer money,” do they? Halliburton’s? Lockheed’s? No, of course not.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/24/949219/-Fake-Koch-call-to-Walker-uses-HR-3-arguments-against-unions

  26. 26.

    El Cid

    February 24, 2011 at 6:23 pm

    That’s all well and good, but these people need to hurt too just like David Brooks and everyone else.

  27. 27.

    goblue72

    February 24, 2011 at 6:25 pm

    Just one more example on a pile of examples of what happens when the bulk of a country’s mass media is controlled by a very small coterie of multinational corporations. They will NEVER report accurately because the mainstream media has a well-known right-wing bias.

  28. 28.

    khead

    February 24, 2011 at 6:26 pm

    @R-Jud:

    Maybe. :)

  29. 29.

    El Cid

    February 24, 2011 at 6:32 pm

    @Sko Hayes:

    …what makes the theory so dangerous is that following its logic, every dollar a public sector employee is paid is and always remains “taxpayer money.”

    If you follow their argument that taxes, especially income taxes, are government theft via coercion.

    Thus, ‘government schools’ are taking your money by force and making you pay these lazy union teachers to fail your kids when only the citizens can choose best how to spend their money.

    These are people who want to get rid of public employees and public schools and public services.

    Except for all that stuff when tax money goes to rich people types.

  30. 30.

    Svensker

    February 24, 2011 at 6:42 pm

    @El Cid:

    Except for all that stuff when tax money goes to rich people types.

    Well, yuh, because rich people are producers who create wealth and jobs. Union folks and school teachers are moochers and leeches who produce nothing, but just steal our money via taxation. I mean, do you think teaching kids produces anything of value? Do you? Do you?! Friggin’ commie.

  31. 31.

    agrippa

    February 24, 2011 at 6:44 pm

    To state the obvious, I doubt if very many people in the general public are going to notice any of this.

    The people in the political class – the politicians and the commentariat – will not be ‘shocked’ by any of it.
    I wonder if very many of them consider how corrupt it has all become. And, that they are participants in it.

  32. 32.

    jwb

    February 24, 2011 at 6:46 pm

    Texas Republicans push for constitutional convention. Yeehaw!

  33. 33.

    Chat Noir

    February 24, 2011 at 6:56 pm

    @agrippa: Along these same lines, Steve Benen had a post today that reinforces my mindset that there are way too many clueless Americans.

  34. 34.

    Art

    February 24, 2011 at 7:01 pm

    Great points, but too nuanced.

    All the “public” knows is union = bad.

  35. 35.

    danimal

    February 24, 2011 at 7:14 pm

    Question for conservatives.

    Hypothetical: You get everything you want. I’m a generic state employee in South Conservastan. I have 10 years experience as a professional and a bachelor’s level degree. You cut my pay 10-20%, you stautorily cap pay increases to no more than the rate of inflation. You pass on any health care cost increases to me. My pension is switched from a defined benefit plan to a 401(k). I receive nothing in return except scapegoating from every Rush Limbaugh wannabe under the sun.

    Who are you going to get to fill my job?

  36. 36.

    El Cid

    February 24, 2011 at 7:19 pm

    @danimal: Mexicans. And you can keep them fearful by having ICE raids every now & then.

    Remember, they refuse to pass laws for penalties on employers who hire the undocumented. So the cheap labor’s kept compliant.

  37. 37.

    jwb

    February 24, 2011 at 7:20 pm

    @danimal: You’re in government. You’re therefore by definition an unproductive worker. Why would your job need to be filled? The state can just outsource it to private industry. /wingnut

  38. 38.

    chopper

    February 24, 2011 at 7:37 pm

    yeah, there’s a lot of confusion over the way pensions work. health insurance is a bit different, because it’s optional and different plans have different costs so the total compensation is variable if the employer contributes. same with a 401(k) or TSP or what not. but disregarding those benefits, with a pension your salary plus your pension contributions make up a consistent total compensation that was already bargained for – if walker signed a bill tomorrow that merely ends state employee pensions completely, employee salaries would immediately go up the amount that is no longer contributed to pensions.

  39. 39.

    PurpleGirl

    February 24, 2011 at 7:49 pm

    I’ve mentioned it a couple of times, but government workers are ALSO taxpayers. Unless there have been some laws which exempt them from taxes that I haven’t heard about.

  40. 40.

    danimal

    February 24, 2011 at 7:59 pm

    @PurpleGirl: Agreed that government workers are taxpayers.

    Voters, too.

  41. 41.

    burnspbesq

    February 24, 2011 at 8:01 pm

    I’m tempted to call Johnston “the Matt Taibbi of tax,” but there’s no reason for me to gratuitously insult Taibbi.

    It’s a pleasant surprise to see that he still knows how to read a contract. This is definitely in the” broken clock is right twice a day” realm.

  42. 42.

    burnspbesq

    February 24, 2011 at 8:03 pm

    @chopper:

    ” if walker signed a bill tomorrow that merely ends state employee pensions completely, employee salaries would immediately go up the amount that is no longer contributed to pensions.”

    That seems highly doubtful. Can you point to specific statutory or contract language that achieves that result?

  43. 43.

    Suffern ACE

    February 24, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    @burnspbesq: I’m more inclined to think that not only will pay be cut, but the pension money will be deemed state money that was “overpaid” to be returned…let the union sue for it. That seems to be how the republicans are rolling in the state these days.

  44. 44.

    rikyrah

    February 24, 2011 at 8:23 pm

    thank you for another great post telling the truth

  45. 45.

    Bubblegum Tate

    February 24, 2011 at 8:47 pm

    But…that would mean Republicans are lying! And that can’t be right.

  46. 46.

    honus

    February 24, 2011 at 9:30 pm

    Aren’t those pension plan contributions protected to that “sanctity of contract” I heard so much a while back? You know, about the time that high taxes on Wall Street bonuses would be class warfare?
    Maybe that U of Chicago law professor who was strapped on $400k a year can weigh n on the compensation of the Wisconsin school teachers.

  47. 47.

    Caz

    February 24, 2011 at 11:34 pm

    Simply false. But, hell, it makes a good article, right?

    This is the “Plan 9 From Outer Space” blog. So bad, it’s good, lol.

  48. 48.

    Chris

    February 25, 2011 at 1:35 am

    Something about this reminds me of Alan Greenspan and the Social Security trust fund/subsequent tax cuts for the rich, but I can’t quite put my finger on it/assemble the proper snark…

  49. 49.

    burnspbesq

    February 25, 2011 at 1:57 am

    @Suffern ACE:

    I’m more inclined to think that not only will pay be cut, but the pension money will be deemed state money that was “overpaid” to be returned…let the union sue for it. That seems to be how the republicans are rolling in the state these days.

    I think that’s mostly right. If the public employee retirement plan in Wisconsin is a typical defined benefit plan, the benefit is based on a formula along the lines of “x percent of career average comp (or average comp for the last y years before retirement) times years of service.” So pay cuts lead inexorably to benefit cuts.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Reality Has A Well-Known Liberal Bias, Wisconsin Edition « The Inverse Square Blog says:
    February 25, 2011 at 6:37 pm

    […] already presented better by someone else here, but anyay:  following up John’s post on the deliberate deception behind “contribute more” demand of public service workers in Wisconsin, here’s […]

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - dmkingto - SF Bay Area Scenes 7
Image by dmkingto (7/31/25)
Donate

Recent Comments

  • mrmoshpotato on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Jul 15, 2025 @ 10:14pm)
  • O. Felix Culpa on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Jul 15, 2025 @ 10:12pm)
  • mrmoshpotato on War for Ukraine Day 1,237: TACO Tuesday!!!! (Jul 15, 2025 @ 10:12pm)
  • Eolirin on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Jul 15, 2025 @ 10:10pm)
  • mrmoshpotato on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Jul 15, 2025 @ 10:10pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!