• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

T R E 4 5 O N

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Battle won, war still ongoing.

Second rate reporter says what?

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Republicans do not pay their debts.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / War / Psy-Ops

Psy-Ops

by $8 blue check mistermix|  February 27, 20119:59 am| 23 Comments

This post is in: War, DC Press Corpse

FacebookTweetEmail

Glenn Greenwald has a good round-up of the media pushback against the latest Rolling Stone article by Michael Hastings, which alleges that Lt. Gen. William Caldwell tried to use psy-ops against VIPs such as Senators and Congressmen. Most of what he finds is anonymously-sourced smears by the WSJ and MSNBC as the millitary fights back.

The New York Times, to its credit, limits its account to a named source, using an email sent to friends by a NATO spokesman. Reading that article, which is full of denials but devoid of smears, it’s clear that the intelligence team was used to gather information on visiting dignitaries, and that the dispute is over the degree to which they were used.

So, the most damning charge against Lt. Gen. Caldwell — that he was more interested in PR for the American public than his mission training Afghan troops — hasn’t been refuted, and it’s hard to see how he survives this:

At a minimum, the use of the IO team against U.S. senators was a misuse of vital resources designed to combat the enemy; it cost American taxpayers roughly $6 million to deploy Holmes and his team in Afghanistan for a year. But Caldwell seemed more eager to advance his own career than to defeat the Taliban. “We called it Operation Fourth Star,” says Holmes. “Caldwell seemed far more focused on the Americans and the funding stream than he was on the Afghans. We were there to teach and train the Afghans. But for the first four months it was all about the U.S. Later he even started talking about targeting the NATO populations.” At one point, according to Holmes, Caldwell wanted to break up the IO team and give each general on his staff their own personal spokesperson with psy-ops training.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread
Next Post: What Possible Reason? »

Reader Interactions

23Comments

  1. 1.

    cathyx

    February 27, 2011 at 10:18 am

    The reason he is more concerned about the funding stream than he is about training Afghans is because he’s a future thinker. Where will his funding stream come from in the future? Defense contractors, of course.

  2. 2.

    Yevgraf (fka Michael)

    February 27, 2011 at 10:18 am

    How do you “psyop” discreet groups of visiting dignitaries? I get that you can manage messaging to entire populations, but this feels like it assigns a credibility to a tactic that sounds like bullshit fluffery, kinda like the interplay between the car salesman and the finance manager in the tower.

  3. 3.

    cleek

    February 27, 2011 at 10:27 am

    i’d worry about this more if i thought PsyOps was more than just high-test PR & negotiating.

    still, if it’s illegal, then bring on the punishment!

  4. 4.

    joe from Lowell

    February 27, 2011 at 10:44 am

    The diversion of resources charge is important, but I don’t think it’s the most important charge.

    The most important charge is that psy-ops personnel were used against American officials by the military.

    Pointing out that PR people do a lot of the same things isn’t the point. There is a bright line for a reason. CIA operatives use a lot of the same techniques as FBI agents. Soldiers use a lot of the same practices as local SWAT teams. Nonetheless, it is illegal for the CIA to conduct covert operations on American soil, and it is illegal to use the military in domestic law enforcement.

  5. 5.

    Dan

    February 27, 2011 at 10:45 am

    It just goes to what I’ve always said about these wars- the missions, the targets, the logistics, the personnel are all overseas, but the objectives are all here in the US.

  6. 6.

    Superluminar

    February 27, 2011 at 10:49 am

    You lost me at “Glenn Greenwald”…

  7. 7.

    burnspbesq

    February 27, 2011 at 10:50 am

    Is there some reason why I should assume Hastings knows what he’s talking about when he opines on legal matters?

  8. 8.

    General Stuck

    February 27, 2011 at 10:52 am

    No creature more dangerous than an ambitious general.

  9. 9.

    jo6pac

    February 27, 2011 at 10:54 am

    it’s hard to see how he survives this

    Let me guess, he gets the 4th star retires to teach college.

  10. 10.

    bkny

    February 27, 2011 at 10:58 am

    @Dan: yes yes and yes… methods, tactics and weapons are being devised and tested and you can be sure they will be deployed here against the people.

  11. 11.

    gypsy howell

    February 27, 2011 at 10:59 am

    The funding IS the mission.

  12. 12.

    scav

    February 27, 2011 at 11:27 am

    Psi-ofs Pays-offs.

    Gee, their defense is we had all these highly trained, valuable specialist people just hanging around our HQ in a war zone difficult area and set them to making coffee and shuffling paper so, hey, throw in a little googling, what’s the issh? !

  13. 13.

    Mike in NC

    February 27, 2011 at 11:35 am

    @jo6pac:

    Let me guess, he gets the 4th star retires to teach college.

    More likely that he’ll retire, collect a juicy pension, go to work as a lobbyist for some defense contractor, and also get hired as a ‘consultant/mentor’ by DOD and get paid $1000 a day to be an advisor to other general officers.

    Meanwhile, the population of homeless and mentally ill vets continues to climb.

  14. 14.

    jake the snake

    February 27, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    Paul M. A. Linebarger, the father of Psy-Ops, is rolling in his grave.

    Of course, this is nothing new. At least not for those of us old enough to remember the death of George Romney’s presidential run.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/frenzy/romney.htm

  15. 15.

    Jules

    February 27, 2011 at 12:46 pm

    The villagers and usual suspects really don’t like Hastings much, do they?

  16. 16.

    Maude

    February 27, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    I don’t like single source, unverified articles like this. Sounds a bit like someone wants to get rid of Caldwell.
    It makes me think of Judith Miller.

  17. 17.

    C1687

    February 27, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    One feature of the Hastings article that has had limited attention so far is that it demonstrates how readily the brass will use “investigations” of minor but oh-so-convenient charges to attack those that displease them, even if the result is to damage the careers of innocent soldiers and officers. We all suspect that such things happen, but this looks to be a pretty clear-cut case. To me, this is even more shameful behavior than the whole psy-ops business.

  18. 18.

    Nutella

    February 27, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    I understand you’re a lawyer. Is there some reason why you are not opining on the legal matters Hastings raised rather than making an ad hominem attack on the reporter?

  19. 19.

    joe from Lowell

    February 27, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    Is there some reason why I should assume Hastings knows what he’s talking about when he opines on legal matters?

    There is if you read the article:

    On March 23rd, Holmes emailed the JAG lawyer who handled information operations, saying that the order made him “nervous.” The lawyer, Capt. John Scott, agreed with Holmes. “The short answer is that IO doesn’t do that,” Scott replied in an email. “[Public affairs] works on the hearts and minds of our own citizens and IO works on the hearts and minds of the citizens of other nations. While the twain do occasionally intersect, such intersections, like violent contact during a soccer game, should be unintentional.”

    …

    In another email, Scott advised Holmes to seek his own defense counsel. “Using IO to influence our own folks is a bad idea,” the lawyer wrote, “and contrary to IO policy.”

    Is there any reason I should assume a military JAG lawyer doesn’t know what he’s talking about when he opines on the law?

  20. 20.

    joe from Lowell

    February 27, 2011 at 2:24 pm

    @Maude:

    I don’t like single source, unverified articles like this.

    The article, which you critics appear to have never read, is neither unverified nor single-sourced.

  21. 21.

    lol

    February 27, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    Is today the day that Greenwald thinks anonymously sourced quotes are bad? I can never keep track.

  22. 22.

    jbb

    February 27, 2011 at 3:50 pm

    Is today the day that “lol” can’t locate any grey matter between his two auditory receptacles? My anonymous sources say yes.

  23. 23.

    vernon

    February 28, 2011 at 2:29 am

    Greenwald is a huge purveyor of falsehoods and I say that because shut up, that’s why.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Geminid on No Cake for Me Today Open Thread (Mar 23, 2023 @ 8:37pm)
  • Ksmiami on Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea (Mar 23, 2023 @ 8:35pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on No Cake for Me Today Open Thread (Mar 23, 2023 @ 8:34pm)
  • Brachiator on No Cake for Me Today Open Thread (Mar 23, 2023 @ 8:33pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on No Cake for Me Today Open Thread (Mar 23, 2023 @ 8:30pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!