The Washington Post reports that the “House passes stopgap funding to avert federal shutdown“:
The House on Tuesday approved a stopgap measure that would keep the federal government funded through March 18 and cut $4 billion in spending by targeting programs that President Obama has already marked for elimination.
__
The proposal, which passed the House on a 335-to-91 vote, now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass easily. The Senate has set a vote on the bill for 11 a.m. Wednesday; Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said on Tuesday that Senate Democrats support the measure….
__
All but six Republican House members voted in favor. Among the Republicans opposing it was Rep. Steve King (Iowa). King tweeted Tuesday afternoon that he would vote no because it would not eliminate funding for the national health care law and would not include an amendment proposed by Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) that would bar federal funding of Planned Parenthood.
__
The other five Republicans opposing the measure were Reps. Louie Gohmert (Texas), Justin Amash (Mich.), Michele Bachmann (Minn.), Ron Paul (Texas) and Walter Jones (N.C.).
__
House Democrats were divided on the measure: 104 Democrats backed it while 85 opposed it. Two members of Democratic leadership, Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson (Conn.) and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (Md.), voted yes; House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), Assistant Minority Leader Jim Clyburn (S.C.) and Democratic Caucus Vice-Chairman Xavier Becerra (Calif.) voted against it.
__
Ahead of the final vote, Democrats offered a motion that would have ended subsidies to oil companies. The measure failed on a 176-to-249 vote, with all but 13 Democrats voting in favor and all Republicans voting “no”.
Meanwhile, Dan Froomkin at the Huffington Post reports “Raucous first caucus for House Tea Partiers Exposes Dangerous Rifts“:
A boisterous first meeting of the House’s Tea Party Caucus on Monday night exposed two potential rifts — one between its members and state-level Tea Party activists, who have no appetite for compromise, and another between its members and Republican Party leaders, who will soon be asking them to do just that.
__
Tea Party leaders from Virginia, Florida and Pennsylvania hotly demanded that the members of the caucus not settle for anything less than defunding the Obama health care law, even on a very short-term basis, attendees told the Huffington Post. They also scoffed at the new Republican target of $61 billion in budget cuts from the rest of this fiscal year, calling it insufficient. And they made it clear Republicans who don’t stand firm will face primary opponents in 2012.
__
“The look on the faces of the members was just unbelievable,” said one attendee, who didn’t want to be identified by name…
__
[D]espite the fact that Republicans symbolically voted to defund Obama’s healthcare law last month, there is no such provision in the short-term budget resolution. That, of course, would be a deal-breaker with the Democrats who control the Senate and the White House.
__
The Tea Party hard-liners just don’t care. “We feel Obamacare is an albatross around the neck of our country. It’s going to sink us,” Stefano said. “So we continue to go at it in every way possible.”
__
Voting to fund it — even for two weeks — “sends the message that it’s not dying,” she said. “The Republicans need to understand this is a key issue.”
__
“I think in general that the Tea Party believes that the very first thing you should do in terms of tackling the spending problem is defund Obamacare,” said fellow speaker Jamie Radtke, a Tea Partier running for Virginia’s U.S. Senate seat.
__
“If you give ground at the very beginning,” she told HuffPost, “then it’s hard to ever make that ground back up again.”
Tea Party to the Republicans: We are sooooo the boss of you! Or, as my people would say, Confusion to our enemies!… not that Steve King and Michele Bachmann weren’t pretty confused already…
patrick II
What is the reason the democrats did not pass a budget back when they had a majority? I haven’t really heard this talked about, and it baffles me.
Scott
I’ll admit, I’m going to enjoy watching the teabaggers’ impotent fury over the next few years.
Litlebritdifrnt
Yeah like providing basic health care, a fundimental human right is somehow communist. I hope these people get some awful disease and then have to deal with an insurance company, there would be no greater irony.
gbear
Bachmann is confused like Don Quixote is confused.
If Don Quixote ran for office now, he’d win on a platform of attacking wind turbines.
Loneoak
@gbear:
CAP AND TAX!
General Stuck
Obama has already laid down the law, or veto threat on the long term draconian budget for the remainder of this year.
And no defunding HCR, so it’s on Harry Reid and the chickenshit brigade of conservadems in the senate, to put a halt to this two week funding nonsense, and just let the wingers close down government, like they want.
King is just impatient, they all want what this is about, and that is defunding HCR, and are hoping senate dems will cave and let them defund it, and PP, for a start. I expect we are going to see something fairly rare in congress, and the senate, and that is majority filibusters, at some point.
Because I have little faith in Nelson, both of them on this, and the other blue dogs in the senate up for reelection in 2012, for selling the farm, and likely their own mothers along with it. All to polish the tea tard knob in their states, who will never vote for them anywho, no matter how much they grovel.
Davis X. Machina
@patrick II: They wanted to avoid all the will-never-pass-but-will-make-good-attack-ads amendments that the GOP promised to attach to the budget, going into the November elections.
This Economist piece sums up where the players were back in September pretty well.
Karen
@patrick II:
I can’t be 100 percent sure but I’d think that possibly the Democratic party may have had a majority but they couldn’t agree. The same problem the Democrats always have, though it’s quite delicious to see the Republicans eat their young. Or is it the young who will eat the Republicans?
ppcli
“Ahead of the final vote, Democrats offered a motion that would have ended subsidies to oil companies. The measure failed on a 176-to-249 vote, with all but 13 Democrats voting in favor and all Republicans voting “no”.”
But, but, the superkillerdeficitmonster is going to eat us! How can we afford to shovel *taxpayers’* money to private companies? If they can’t make a profit without that money, shouldn’t they be, like, going bankrupt or something?
gbear
Pictures or it didn’t happen. I want to see them.
rob!
I’ll say it, that Tea Party article gave me a hard-on.
stuckinred
For those who didn’t see it there was a plea for funds for a sweet basset stray who needed surgery a few threads back. The goal was $1000 and we (I’m not sure who outside of BJ was in on it) went over in a couple of hours. This place is good.
Elvis Elvisberg
To hell with the CBO estimates, to hell with the fact that we spend well over twice the OECD average on health care for worse results… the feelings of white people are far more important than facts.
mclaren
So General Crackpot Fake Name dire prediction of fiscal end-of-the-world doom turned out to be bullshit.
Gee. What a surprise, eh?
Since essentially everything General Crackpot Fake Name has ever posted has turned out to be bullshit, this was a no-brainer.
arguingwithsignposts
@Elvis Elvisberg:
FTFY
General Stuck
@mclaren:
Yawn
KG
The Tea Party is everything they think the Democrats are, which is to say, everything the Talk Radio set has told them for years that the Democrats are: a group of people who are not interested in “compromise”… paraphrasing Limbaugh, Democrats believe compromise is they get everything they want and the Republicans go along with it. Our system is built to build consensus and operate with compromise, the Tea Partiers will have none of it, because they are righteous and good (in their minds) and the rest of us are evil assholes hell bent on destroying the country.
Wile E. Quixote
Wait, are the Democrats learning something here? Forcing the Republicans to vote against a measure to stop subsidizing oil companies. Why it’s almost like they’re learning tactics or something. Now if we could just get the Senate to do this sort of thing.
Wile E. Quixote
She might be a batshit insane teabagging whore, but Jamie Radtke could teach the Democrats a few things about how to negotiate.
stuckinred
@Wile E. Quixote: First thing I thought when I read it.
Comrade Luke
Since there’s no open thread I’ll post this here.
This takedown of David Brooks – all of them – is the best I’ve ever read.
Wile E. Quixote
@ppcli:
No, because if we stop giving subsidies to the oil companies it would be soⅽⅰaⅼⅰsm and the terrorists will win because they hate us for our freedoms.
karen marie
@patrick II: @Davis X. Machina: And then after the election, with the “huge” Democratic losses and the stink Republicans made about how “unfair” it was for the Democrats to “ram” the budget through before the end of the session, Democrats decided it would be a really good idea to let the newly-elected teabaggers decide the federal budget.
Yeah, I don’t understand it either.
patrick II
@Davis X. Machina:
Thanks. I had no idea that five of the last seven budgets were not passed. It seems the entire country is now being run like a giant game of chicken — holding out until the last second until someone actually crashes.
Loneoak
@Comrade Luke:
Schadenfreudgasm.
CB
OBAMACARE is the albatross around our necks??
where the hell have these people been for the last 10 years!
the lack of awareness, and the willingness to be led of a cliff in the name of tribal loyalty, would be funny if it werent so god damn sad.
gbear
@Comrade Luke: Wow. That was good. And brutal.
Martin
Yeah, this is going to end very badly for the GOP in 2012. Unfortunately for them, the tone for the national debate is coming in the shadow of Walker’s asshattedness. The House needs Walker to knock that shit off or they’re going to step onto stage looking like complete dicks from the outset (which of course they are), but even an apathetic public is having trouble not noticing what’s happening in state capitols.
Thoughtful Black Co-Citizen
What sort of drinks does one serve Purity Purge Party?
realbtl
@Thoughtful Black Co-Citizen:
Ipecac martini, what else.
The Dangerman
@Thoughtful Black Co-Citizen:
Iced Tea with a twist of bitter.
Edit: Would it be humanly possible for the Right to actually do something on JOBS? Yes, improving the economy means they lose in 2012; newsflash, fuckers, you are going to lose in 2012. Are you really going to tank the economy all the way to 2016?
Chuck Butcher
@Thoughtful Black Co-Citizen:
I thought that was the Democratic drink…
abscam
@General Stuck: Try “meh,” it works for me.
Angry Black Lady
@stuckinred: that’s fantastic! i didn’t see it or i would have donated. i’m a sucker for animals in need.
JCT
@Comrade Luke
I read Brooks’ drivel this AM and instantly regretted it – the takedown made me feel better, thanks!
Hah, when I originally read this part:
I almost lost my cookies – yes, Brooks you twit – there are those OMG, DEATH PANELS.
I just don’t know how he makes a living at this.
Omnes Omnibus
@CB: Eventually the tea people will be sadder and wiser people.
ppcli
@Omnes Omnibus:
“Eventually the tea people will be sadder and wiser people.”
I don’t doubt for an instant that they’ll be sadder. But I’m not as much of an optimist as you otherwise. Though I imagine that their unwisdom may mutate into a slightly different form. (Channeled, no doubt, by a different Koch-funded organization run by Dick Armey.)
ppcli
@ppcli:
Perhaps it will be called “The New Jacksonians” and everybody will wear their hair shaggy.
Cliff in NH
@patrick II:
@Davis X. Machina:
@Karen:
@karen marie:
They Never had a majority.
Lie berman is NOT A Democrat.
Phoenician in a time of Romans
“The look on the faces of the members was just unbelievable,” said one attendee, who didn’t want to be identified by name…
Yeah, I imagine it was similiar to that on the delegates to the French National Convention when they realised that Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety hadn’t ordered those guillotines as lawn ornaments…
Cliff in NH
@Cliff in NH:
A Traitor Among Us? The Dems’ Lieberman Problem
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1857307,00.html
Mike in NC
@The Dangerman:
Meanwhile, they have roughly 20 months to return the country to the 19th century.
Full speed astern, teatards!
Jim, Once
@Comrade Luke: Thank you. That went on my FB page immediately.
Nylund
Spending cuts will result in major job losses at a time when unemployment remains very high and the private sector still isn’t hiring. Every (decent) economist knows this. But, I bet, no matter how thoroughly you explained this to a teabagger, it wouldn’t matter. Their mentality is, “my team wants X and if we don’t get X, we’ll be mad.” The fact that X doesn’t actually do any good doesn’t matter. X could be anything. It doesn’t have to be spending cuts. it could be purple balloons. its purely a tribal mentality. They could say they want deficit reductions and you could point out that ACA helps towards that goal, but that doesn’t matter. Its not about the goal, its simply a mindframe that the world is a zero-sum game, that if their tribe gets what they want, then the other tribe must have lost something. There is no concept of anything being mutually beneficial or “good for America” as a whole.
sfp
@Wile E. Quixote: Knowing that none of your priorities are going to pass this term makes the tactics a whole lot simpler.
liberal
@Cliff in NH:
Uh, they didn’t need Lieberman for a majority, did they? They needed him for a supermajority.
liberal
@Martin:
I hope you’re right, but where’s the polling data that shows this? Last I heard re Fed shutdown the public was something like 1/3 blames the Rethugs, 1/3 blames the Dems, and the idiot independent/undecideds blamed both for playing politics.
rapier
The deficit cannot be cut. Maintaining the borrowing and spending is an existential necessity for GDP growth currently and has been for 30 months. On the other hand the global markets cannot support the 8 trillion in Treasury borrowing, that is new borrowing and rolling over old borrowing, over the next two years at anywhere close to current low interest rates. It will need the help of the Fed to buy up the Treasury bonds with printed money which will flow into the financial world where it will bid up various assets classes, stocks and commodities or freaking gold and let’s not forget oil. So our overlords will get even more wealthy and social cohesion will continue to devolve.
Now you don’t have to believe this story but at least consider the possibility that it is generally true. What it means is we are in an interlocking series of dilemmas in the political economy and that makes perfect sense. After all the political world is a total fail. Failure of the political sphere guarantees failure in the economic because they are totally entwined. The economic failure and the political failure, or to put it another way the failure of governance, are perfectly coincident.
As whacked as you think various flavor of alt economic analysis are from Austrian to low Tea Party to anarchist it must be appreciated that the root of all of them a coming to grips with the collapse of the pose WWII order. We are officially in interesting times and thinking in terms of the old playbook, ie. let’s deficit spend till things are right, is simply not possible. You can wish it and hope it and write a billion pages on how it is totally rational and moral but history doesn’t care about rational or moral.