• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

If you don’t believe freedom is for everybody, then the thing you love isn’t freedom, it is privilege.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

One way or another, he’s a liar.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

I would try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

People identifying as christian while ignoring christ and his teachings is a strange thing indeed.

Trump should be leading, not lying.

If you can’t control your emotions, someone else will.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

“When somebody takes the time to draw up a playbook, they’re gonna use it.”

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

They are not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

When we show up, we win.

We will not go back.

Consistently wrong since 2002

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”

Republicans cannot even be trusted with their own money.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / Secretly Canadian

Secretly Canadian

by @heymistermix.com|  March 26, 20118:24 am| 66 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs

FacebookTweetEmail

It really is remarkable how little coverage Canadian politics gets in the US press. If I hadn’t been out with a friend who knows more about Canadian politics than I do about our American idiots, I wouldn’t have learned that Stephen Harper’s government fell yesterday. What’s interesting about yesterday’s no-confidence vote is that Harper’s Conservative government was also found in contempt of Parliament, the first time that’s happened in the history of Canada.

For those of you who don’t eat poutine, this timeline shows that the reason the Harper government fell was that it didn’t disclose the details of the cost of major crime and tax revenue bills, and they also lied about the cost of procuring new F-35 fighters. Here’s a Globe and Mail backgrounder on the two major party candidates.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread: The Beauty of Professionalism
Next Post: Fukushima Mon Amour »

Reader Interactions

66Comments

  1. 1.

    ErinSiobhan

    March 26, 2011 at 8:33 am

    Well played by the opposition to bring down the government on the contempt charge and not the budget. That’s got to annoy the Conservatives.

    Harper is still likely to win a minority but the potential for a coalition is interesting.

  2. 2.

    MikeJ

    March 26, 2011 at 8:37 am

    Going prorogue.

  3. 3.

    Rick Massimo

    March 26, 2011 at 8:41 am

    … the reason the Harper government fell was that it didn’t disclose the details of the cost of major crime and tax revenue bills, and they also lied about the cost of procuring new F-35 fighters.

    That’s a joke, right? In the States, conservatives do that before breakfast. And, as often as not, brag about it in speeches.

  4. 4.

    burnspbesq

    March 26, 2011 at 8:51 am

    Time to start reading Maclean’s. Pass the poutine, s’il vous plait.

  5. 5.

    Nathan

    March 26, 2011 at 8:52 am

    As someone who is openly Canadian, I can say with confidence we’ll probably be in the exact same spot, or likely worse, at the end of this.

    Part of me want things to go really wrong so the Liberals can once again go into panic mode and dump their leader. Michael Ignatieff, being a scholar and an author and a friend of Salman Rushdie and all that, may seem attractive, but he’s useless as a politician. And he’s no progressive: in the past, he has repeatedly made the case that the US has had to bad things like torture people because, you know, the REAL bad guys do worse. And he supported extending our Afghanistan mission, which is a nice way to spend a few billion dollars a year while everything else gets cut.

  6. 6.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    March 26, 2011 at 8:53 am

    I personally hope that something happens during the campaign that causes the CPoC to tank big time. Bunch of fucking Harris retreads… they sucked when they ran Ontario and they really suck now.

  7. 7.

    Southern Beale

    March 26, 2011 at 8:53 am

    I knew Steven Harper’s conservative government fell yesterday from Teh Twittahz. However, the story I read also said that the move has spawned elections which will most likely see the conservatives win.

    So I really don’t understand parliamentary systems at all. How can your government fall and then return to power in the next election?

  8. 8.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    March 26, 2011 at 8:54 am

    @Nathan: Yeah, I agree. I think that it’s time to give the dippers a turn… which just goes to show you how bad it’s gotten.

  9. 9.

    Nathan

    March 26, 2011 at 8:54 am

    burnspbesq – Mark Steyn is one of Macleans’ featured writers. It’s like Newsweek with less intellectual heft.

  10. 10.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    March 26, 2011 at 8:59 am

    @Southern Beale: One’s about the confidence of parliament, the other’s about the confidence of the Canadian people.

    That said, if the Canadian people hand him a majority, they’re twits. The hopeful sign is that the people have lost a lot of faith in the Conservative’s competence, according to one recent poll.

    For me, I have the misfortune of having known Baird at Queen’s; we went to school there at the same time. He was an asshole then and is an asshole now.

  11. 11.

    Superluminar

    March 26, 2011 at 9:02 am

    Maybe the fall of the government will mean the evil Canadians will end their baby-killing, imperialistic little “intervention” in Libya.

  12. 12.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    March 26, 2011 at 9:03 am

    @Rick Massimo: Hey dude… welcome to the Real World. We actually expect competence.

  13. 13.

    The Political Nihilist Formerly Known As Kryptik

    March 26, 2011 at 9:03 am

    @Nathan:

    Yeah, that’s sadly what I’m hearing from folks in Canada that I know as well: the Conservatives are still probably going to be leading or even have total power, because people hate/fear the Liberals enough to deny them a coalition.

    I understand that the Liberal party in Canada is hardly analogous to our liberals, but Christ, the world really has fucking turned anything Liberal into a fucking plague to them, hasn’t it? :/

  14. 14.

    Murc

    March 26, 2011 at 9:04 am

    The left in Canada is between a rock and a hard place. The Liberals have a giant fucking ball and chain named Michael Ignatieff dragging them down (and the article linked at The Star, by the way, mastermix, is total bullshit; the Liberals didn’t lose in 2008 because of Stephane Dion, they lost because of incumbent weariness. It was peddled as Dion’s fault in order to justify Ignatieff being taken seriously) and don’t have the stones to rid themselves of him.

    Meanwhile Jack Layton can’t get taken seriously despite having the most heft of any major party leader in the whole country.

  15. 15.

    soonergrunt

    March 26, 2011 at 9:05 am

    @Nathan:

    It’s like Newsweek with less intellectual heft.

    How is this possible? Newsweak is a collection of people with pretensions to intellectualism who really aren’t intellectual. If Macleans is even less intellectual, doesn’t that cause a singularity of non-intellectualism, with the entire world being sucked in and destroyed and no force, including light able to escape?

  16. 16.

    Alex

    March 26, 2011 at 9:08 am

    So I really don’t understand parliamentary systems at all. How can your government fall and then return to power in the next election?

    The current government is a minority government. The Conservatives are the biggest party in Parliament, but they don’t have an outright majority. It took all three opposition parties working together to bring down the government, but there’s no way, politically, that they could form a permanent coalition (since one of the three is the separatist Bloc Quebecois).

    If the balance in Parliament doesn’t shift significantly (early polls hint that it won’t), then we’ll be right back to a minority Conservative government again.

  17. 17.

    leftwinger

    March 26, 2011 at 9:09 am

    I hope my fellow Canadians get it together enough to dump the band of neocon fascists that have been running things for the past 5 years. I’ve never seen a political party as evil as the CPC.

    ps MacLeans isn’t worth lining your birdcage with.

  18. 18.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    March 26, 2011 at 9:16 am

    @leftwinger: I’m with you. They are fucked. How do the people in Whitby keep re-electing that lying fucker Flaherty?

    As a reference; when Flaherty was finance minister in Ontario he closed out his career there by flat out lying about the state of the books in his last provincial election there.

    Flat. Out. Lying. Caught red-handed after the election that he lost when it came out that his ministry told him the truth but he lied to the public about it. The electorate in Whitby must be brain-damaged.

  19. 19.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    March 26, 2011 at 9:18 am

    @soonergrunt: I’m sure this is all pie to you, but believe me, it’s possible.

  20. 20.

    JGabriel

    March 26, 2011 at 9:22 am

    @Murc:

    Meanwhile Jack Layton can’t get taken seriously …

    Why not? Not rhetorical, I really want to know.

    .

  21. 21.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    March 26, 2011 at 9:25 am

    @JGabriel: It’s because he’s NDP. Been their fate since they were founded; in many ways, they exist for the Liberals to ideologically plunder for their good ideas.

    It’s because they’re new; they weren’t around at Confederation.

  22. 22.

    The Political Nihilist Formerly Known As Kryptik

    March 26, 2011 at 9:31 am

    @polyorchnid octopunch:

    And yet we have Rick Scott in charge of whether a state gets Medicare funding or not, and how it’s used.

    In other words, the neoconification/wingnuttification has pretty much engulfed the whole ‘Western’ world. So…enjoy. :/

  23. 23.

    keestadoll

    March 26, 2011 at 9:40 am

    If I hadn’t been out with a friend who knows more about Canadian politics than I do about our American idiots, I wouldn’t have learned that Stephen Harper’s government fell yesterday.

    As if we needed another reason to read press from outside this country.

  24. 24.

    rikyrah

    March 26, 2011 at 9:44 am

    Rachel Maddow had a nice explanation on what happened.

  25. 25.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    March 26, 2011 at 9:46 am

    @rikyrah: Got link? I’d like to check it out… see if she got it right. Most of the time, when reading other countries’ press, they just don’t.

  26. 26.

    burnspbesq

    March 26, 2011 at 9:51 am

    @Nathan:

    Steyn is an issue, to be sure, but their news coverage is better than any weekly this side of The Economist. And, in case no one told you, you do have the option of skipping the pages that Steyn is on.

  27. 27.

    mem from somerville

    March 26, 2011 at 9:55 am

    It pisses me off to no end that I can get Spanish and Portuguese sports and soap operas but I can’t get a single Canuck channel. I would love CBC.

    And it’s bizarre. The first cable we had in the 70s where I grew up in Lowell had a French Canadian station which I did watch at the time. (I saw The Omen in French–so I wasn’t keen on the politics at the time). But that was a long time ago now.

  28. 28.

    burnspbesq

    March 26, 2011 at 9:57 am

    @leftwinger:

    “I’ve never seen a political party as evil as the CPC.”

    Really?Allow us to introduce you to the Republican Party. And here’s its cute Irish cousin, Fianna Fail.

  29. 29.

    Murc

    March 26, 2011 at 10:02 am

    @JGabriel:

    Short answer? Layton is the leader of the NDP, which means he’s treated as sort of like the cute kid who has to be indulged because those people who don’t vote for the two ‘serious’ parties keep giving his faction enough political power it can’t be outright ignored.

    Canadian politics are different from American ones, of course, but there have been ongoing and somewhat successful efforts to tar anyone to the left of establishment Liberal figures as fundamentally unserious people who shouldn’t be regarded as REAL leaders.

  30. 30.

    Janet

    March 26, 2011 at 10:03 am

    When Bush was re-elected, I moved to Canada. I’m very happy; it was the right decision; I’ll end my days here.

    But even after 6 years of living with Canadians, I still feel a surreal kind of culture shock. The Canadians I know, my neighbors and friends, seem to be just like Americans, but they aren’t.

    In Canada, unions and the labor movement are strong, there’s no drama about abortion (even though Canada has its share of religious zealots), the banking system is considered the soundest in the world (there was no banking or mortgage crisis here.) Life expectancy is higher than in the US. There are handgun laws and socialism. My (essentially red-neck but very nice) neighbors accept all this as the norm, there doesn’t seem to be a “27%” here.

    There are Canadian politicians who would love to adopt the corrupt ways of the American political system. Harper loved Bush, even when he was being snubbed. It’ll be interesting to see how the current challenge plays itself out. But it’ll happen quickly — in a couple of months — without assassination attempts, talk-show hysteria, etc.

  31. 31.

    ppcli

    March 26, 2011 at 10:09 am

    @burnspbesq:
    No comment on Macleans as far as political coverage, etc. is concerned, though I don’t think they’re as bad as some people here appear to. But I do want to give them credit for the idea of devoting the final page of each issue to a full-page, revealing and warmly, sometimes almost lovingly written obituary of some “person on the street” who passed away in the preceding weeks. I love those things – never miss one.

  32. 32.

    Schad

    March 26, 2011 at 10:15 am

    Our Conservative Party is an odd bunch. As a raving pinko, I was scared silly when Harper and his bunch of Perot-wannabees swept into kinda-power five years ago, but my biggest complaint now isn’t that they’ve been enacting all manner of crazed right-wing policies, it’s that they’ve spent that time doing absolutely nothing, which has been just as detrimental.

    It’s rather remarkable; they haven’t instituted a single signature program, or really done anything even mildly of note…they’ve sat with their thumbs up their asses, passing the occasional tax break, engaging in all manner of idiotic and petty (but inconsequential in the grand scheme) ethics violations, safe in the knowledge that the left — which gets close to two-thirds of the votes in most elections — will split enough votes to allow them another minority government, so long as they don’t piss anyone off by actually trying to govern.

    Meanwhile, the debt — which the Liberals finally got under control during the late nineties/early aughts — continues creeping up, with not a bloody thing to show for it. I’m glad that they haven’t been able to foist many of the policies they touted while in opposition upon the country, but when the best thing one can say of a half-decade of governance is that your inaction hasn’t fucked things up as badly as action might have, it’s about time to move on.

    Granted, it’s a state of affairs that I’m sure many Americans would gladly take over the rise of the Teatards.

  33. 33.

    Fucen Pneumatic Fuck Wrench Tarmal

    March 26, 2011 at 10:20 am

    so what does this have to do with the price of a half-quarter in oshawa

  34. 34.

    Maude

    March 26, 2011 at 10:24 am

    @mem from somerville:
    I read Canadian news online. Austrailian also, too.

  35. 35.

    schrodinger's cat

    March 26, 2011 at 10:47 am

    @burnspbesq: Have you been following the cricket world cup?

  36. 36.

    mem from somerville

    March 26, 2011 at 10:47 am

    @Maude: Thanks Maude. I am familiar with the internet. But there is this other device in my house–an antique, I know–but it somehow obtains programming all day from the air. I think it can also be used for watching stories and reports that are not available on the internet, and in a larger size.

  37. 37.

    RedKitten

    March 26, 2011 at 10:50 am

    Honestly, I’d just be happy if a few things happened:

    1. If the Bloc was no longer considered eligible for federal office. They don’t even make a pretense of having any other province’s interests in mind, and yet their leader is eligible to be PM? That galls me to no end.

    2. If the other parties cleaned house and got new leaders. As a bonus, they can also get rid of Peter “Why the long face?” MacKay. I don’t trust Harper as far as I can throw him — not since the Atlantic Accord fiasco. Honestly, I’d like to see the parties look somewhere besides Ontario, Alberta and Quebec for their leadership for a change.

    3. I’d ALSO like to be able to vote for our Prime Minister separately from my Member of Parliament. For the longest time, I was in a real spot of difficulty, because our local Conservative guy was AWESOME. Just an all-around good guy with good ethics who got shit done for his constituents. But voting for him meant voting for Harper, and that always stuck in my craw. I was actually kind of happy when he was booted out of caucus (for voting against his own party’s budget) and I could vote for him as an independent.

    Unfortunately, here in Canada, we seem to have a real history of keeping a party in power until we’re so fucking sick of them that we can’t even look at them anymore. So we vote the other party in, lather, rinse, repeat.

  38. 38.

    Pongo

    March 26, 2011 at 10:55 am

    @leftwinger: You are familiar with American Republicans, right?

  39. 39.

    Anya

    March 26, 2011 at 11:06 am

    This is the fourth time in less than seven years the Canucks are having a federal election. Talk about election fatigue! This non-confidence motion is not surprising because Harper has been egging on the opposition. I really I am disappointed with the Canadian electorate though, they seem to be giving Harper’s goons a pass. The Liberals were destroyed because of the sponsorship scanda. What made it worse was the infighting between the Paul Martin faction and Jean Chretien faction and the party never recovered from that. It’s amazing how little of the ongoing Conservative Party’s scandals stick. I don’t know if its apathy or if it’s the quality of the opposition, but it’s disappointing. The government fell because they were found to be in contempt of Parliament, for hiding the true cost of bills. There’s also the document tampering, withholding access to information, denying funding to non-for-profits based politics, and so on. Yet, there’s a chance they might even get a majority government. More and more they resemble their American cousins, IOKIAC.

  40. 40.

    Maude

    March 26, 2011 at 11:14 am

    @mem from somerville:
    I don’t have one of them new fangled thingies with the big screen. I read news only. I do listen to radio news. I am a lot calmer than when I had cable. It is disguting that we can’t get news through other countires from all over the world. Cable can do that, but no, they do stupid programming.
    It is a shame that people in this country are so ill informed with all of the available technology. I’d like to see the MSM go down in flames. Thanks for bring up this subject.
    EDIT: Dear Maude, plz learn to spell.

  41. 41.

    ruemara

    March 26, 2011 at 11:19 am

    @Anya:

    I think they just aren’t as evil as our brand of American Conservative®, down he’yah. If we sent a few of the evils your way, you might see a different reaction from the rather sensible Canadians. At least, the ones I know.

    Also, Rachel M brought this story up. All I could think is how lovely if we could do this in certain states.

  42. 42.

    ppcli

    March 26, 2011 at 11:23 am

    @Schad: I’m worried that they’ve been biding their time until they get a majority government. They seem to have been reading from the same playbook as the American Republicans. One rule of thumb seems to be never to reveal what you actually have in mind until you can force it through quickly. (Walker in Wisconsin was a major miscalculation in that regard – they failed to anticipate the procedural obstacle of the quorum, plus the recall possibilities, and that gave a foothold and breathing space for an opposition movement to form.) Give Harper a majority for 5 years, and a free hand with the CRTC, and Fox News North will be broadcasting in Canada before you know it. That is, there will be a broadcast propaganda arm of the Conservatives just as there is one for the Republicans down here. Given the effect of Fox down here, I don’t want to see what it would do to the Canadian political scene.

  43. 43.

    Anya

    March 26, 2011 at 11:36 am

    @ruemara: No one can be as evil as our brand of conservatives (at least in a democracy), but the Canadian conservatives are modeling themselves after them. They are an aspiring teabaggers. One of Harper’s greatest skill is that he’s been masterful in keeping the crazy under wraps. I mean the Canadian public or media will not tolerate a Parliamentarian who admits that he does not believe in evolution or wants to make abortion illegal, or dismantle the Canadian Health Care system. His caucus is full of crazies, yet they’ve been very disciplined and mostly keep their craziness to themselves.

  44. 44.

    PIGL

    March 26, 2011 at 11:51 am

    @RedKitten: It seems you want republic, which we are not.

    There is nothing inconsistent with the Bloq being a separatist Party. If they ran candidates in other provinces and a big enough majority of seats, why on earth should the leader of the Bloq NOT become Prime Minister.

    Under the actual circumstances, althout technically speaking he could be asked be asked by GG to form a government, there is no danger of his able a command a majority the House, so it can’t happen. I think it frankly silly to get bent out of shape about something like this. The voters in a Riding may elect who they wish to represent them, and those reps have the right to be seated in Parliament and to organise themselves as a Party.

  45. 45.

    Schad

    March 26, 2011 at 11:56 am

    @ppcli:

    That’s my fear as well, though I wonder whether they’ve long since come to the conclusion that they wouldn’t get reelected if they actually did stuff. It would be five years in power followed by a return to the wilderness, and could potentially trigger what they fear the most: a reconciliation between the Liberals and the NDP which would keep them out of office for the foreseeable future given the ideological leanings of everything east of Alberta.

    A good portion of Harper’s caucus is indeed batshit insane, but as Anya notes their leadership seems perfectly content to keep the crazy under wraps and muddle through if it means staying in office. It might be a harder sell to the base with a majority, but Harper strikes me as the sort who’s more than happy to put aside principle in favour of the high threadcount sheets of 24 Sussex.

  46. 46.

    OzoneR

    March 26, 2011 at 12:10 pm

    @Southern Beale:

    How can your government fall and then return to power in the next election?

    people vote you back in

  47. 47.

    Svensker

    March 26, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    Here’s a Globe and Mail backgrounder on the two major party candidates.

    The thing G&M neglected to mention was that Iggie is an Israel firster.

  48. 48.

    PIGL

    March 26, 2011 at 12:44 pm

    @Svensker: That is something they would fail to mention, as it is pretty much true of the G&M itself, and of an implortant part of its public. Understandable from history, but unfortunate in my opinion.

  49. 49.

    MaryRC

    March 26, 2011 at 12:45 pm

    One of Harper’s greatest skill is that he’s been masterful in keeping the crazy under wraps.

    One of the crazies who escaped was Bev Oda, Ministry of International Co-operation, who changed an already-signed memo from CIDA (Canadian equivalent of USAID) by inserting the word “not” into it. And then lying about it. And Harper stood by her.

  50. 50.

    Comrade Mary

    March 26, 2011 at 12:47 pm

    @RedKitten:

    Honestly, I’d like to see the parties look somewhere besides Ontario, Alberta and Quebec for their leadership for a change.

    IIRC, a lot of us were looking to McKenna, but he wasn’t interested.

    After resigning the premiership of New Brunswick, McKenna was identified as a potential future leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, and Prime Minister of Canada. A poll released on August 23, 2005, commissioned by the Toronto Star, showed that McKenna was the top choice of the public to succeed Prime Minister Paul Martin. Among the general public, McKenna beat former New Democratic Party Ontario Premier Bob Rae by a margin of 23 to 11 while among self-identified Liberals, McKenna beat former Deputy Prime Minister of Canada John Manley by a margin of 28 to 13.[3] The October 2005 issue of Saturday Night magazine had pollster Darrell Bricker and Liberal strategist Warren Kinsella create odds for potential Liberal leadership candidates. They made McKenna the favourite with 7 to 2 odds beating Scott Brison (8 to 1), Martin Cauchon (10 to 1), Michael Ignatieff and John Manley (each 15 to 1) among others.
    __
    On January 30, 2006, McKenna confirmed earlier reports that he was not running for the Liberal leadership to replace Paul Martin, who announced his resignation as party leader on the January 23, 2006 election night. McKenna acknowledged the strength of the Liberal brand stating: “You’ve got pretty good odds of being the prime minister if you’re leader of the Liberal party” – every leader of the Liberal party since Sir Wilfrid Laurier in 1896 had become prime minister.[4] However, he put an end to his involvement in the 2006 Liberal Party leadership race, explaining his decision by saying that he did not want “his life to become consumed by politics.”[5] and that: “I reminded myself of my vow upon leaving office that, having escaped the trap, I wouldn’t go back for the cheese.”[6]

  51. 51.

    Brachiator

    March 26, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    The Economist take on Canadian politics:

    CANADIANS have been to the polls three times in the past seven years. On March 23rd the country’s three opposition parties vowed to bring down the minority Conservative government at the first opportunity, either by rejecting its budget or by a no-confidence vote. As The Economist went to press, an election seemed inevitable—only a last-minute change of heart by one of the parties before a vote is called could prevent one. Yet according to recent polls, voters are likely to choose a Parliament almost identical to today’s. So why are Canada’s parties spoiling for a fight?
    __
    The main reason an election is imminent is that both Canada’s main parties think that with a successful campaign they can defy the polls to break the country’s political stalemate. The Conservatives finished first in both the 2006 and 2008 elections, but could not win a majority, making them the longest-serving minority government in Canadian history. The parties’ poll numbers have barely budged in the past five years.

    I would appreciate learning Canadian posters’ take on this.

    By the way, a 2010 Economist article made the assertion that “Stephen Harper is counting on Canadians’ complacency as he rewrites the rules of his country’s politics to weaken legislative scrutiny.” Not a positive take on what was happening.

  52. 52.

    Jason In the Peg

    March 26, 2011 at 1:07 pm

    For the me the most worrisome thing about the last 5 years is what has been done to the ministries. Appointing conservative lackey’s and stacking the bureaucracy with hacks and idealogue. The chaos at the top of the RCMP, CIDA, Rights and Democracy and who knows what else, but Judge Dewar was a patronage appointment so throw the courts into the mix as well.

    Should we be so luck as to get rid of the Harper government I’m afraid it will be years before we get a full accounting of the damage done.

  53. 53.

    PeakVT

    March 26, 2011 at 1:10 pm

    @polyorchnid octopunch: That ‘stache doesn’t help. It’s not bad, but people just don’t seem to elect leaders with mustaches these days.

  54. 54.

    Peter

    March 26, 2011 at 1:21 pm

    @Brachiator:

    I really hope that the opposition parties are right. They have a ton of mud they can sling at the Tories, but for some reason none of it’s sticking. Meanwhile, Harper’s been flooding the airwaves with ridiculous attack ads against Ignatieff for over two years now. They all have the same theme – that he spent a long time in the States, only came back to Canada to try and become Prime Minister for his own personal gain. It’s blatant smearing, and it makes me sick to my stomach, frankly. I expect this sort of thing out of US politics, not Canada’s.

    Hopefully, once election season starts, the opposition parties will be able to get the public to engage more on these sorts of scandals. Harper’s done a lot of nasty stuff during his time as Prime Minister, and if ‘He used to live in the United States’ is honestly the best Harper can come up with, he’s definitely going to be outmatched in the mud war. The only question is whether the Canadian public will give a shit.

  55. 55.

    PeakVT

    March 26, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    I just looked at the provincial legislative makeup, and it looks very conservative (the BC and QB Liberals are to the right of the national party), and with more regionalism than I expected. The NDP holds only two legislatures.

  56. 56.

    Yutsano

    March 26, 2011 at 1:36 pm

    @Peter: I just read a few details on CBC.ca, and Layton sounds like he’s chomping at the bit to try and increase his standing in Parliament. And if he really was running second to Conservatives in certain ridings, he may just have a point. It always seems like no matter what BC gets screwed in national elections (I only care because A) they’re neighbours to the north of me and B) my ex lives there) so I hope they go all-out NDP in May. Either way break out the popcorn, I bet this one gets ugly.

  57. 57.

    Hewer of Wood, Drawer of Water

    March 26, 2011 at 2:00 pm

    @RedKitten: what gives me hope is that even with the Liberals picking complete idiots as leaders (at least politically – I liked what Dion had to say, but he was pretty tone deaf in terms of how he said things, and Iggy is clearly no moron), Harper was never able to cobble together a majority. Now that Ignatieff seems to have developed a semblance of a spine, and the Conservatives giving a big “FUCK YOU” to the country on everything from the G20 to the various scandals, there’s at least a reason to be optimistic that he has worn out his welcome quicker that Mulroney and Chretien did. Harper doesn’t do himself any favours by being so smug and arrogant

    Let the farcical aquatic ceremony begin!

  58. 58.

    Mike G

    March 26, 2011 at 2:04 pm

    @Jason In the Peg:

    For the me the most worrisome thing about the last 5 years is what has been done to the ministries. Appointing conservative lackey’s and stacking the bureaucracy with hacks and idealogue.

    Harper sounds a lot like the Bush Administration. Standard conservative ideology I guess — since government “isn’t good for anything”, they don’t care about it performing any important functions with competence, so turn it into a tool of the ruling party and its cronies.

  59. 59.

    Martin

    March 26, 2011 at 2:12 pm

    So, lying to your legislative body is illegal in Canada? Huh. What a cool idea. We should try that.

  60. 60.

    Yutsano

    March 26, 2011 at 2:16 pm

    @Martin: It’ll never catch on. Lying seems to be the raison d’etre of the Republican Party.

  61. 61.

    Jason In the Peg

    March 26, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    @Mike G: He seems to be very much like Bush right down to his fundie beliefs and folksy interest in the national sport. He never owned a team but he’s been promising us a book about hockey since his first national campaign.

  62. 62.

    Peter

    March 26, 2011 at 3:00 pm

    @Mike G: Yeah, he’s pretty much the Bush of the North, right down to the attacks on science (by killing the long-form census and putting a tight leash on government scientists). I reaaaaally hope we can get rid of him this election.

  63. 63.

    burnspbesq

    March 26, 2011 at 3:55 pm

    Only in Canada could some idiot provincial human rights bureaucrat turn Mark Steyn into the poster boy for free speech.

  64. 64.

    Tyrone Slothrop

    March 26, 2011 at 6:00 pm

    The Bloc do present a challenge to the formation of a majority government. With neither the Conservatives nor the Liberals suffering from serious internal divisions or diminution exacted as payback directed towards an unpopular Prime Minister (Hi, Brian!), it will be very difficult for either to achieve a majority with the Bloc preventing Québec from significantly playing a role in it. With that said, IMO a Harper majority looks more likely to be the result than an Ignatieff minority.

  65. 65.

    Malovich

    March 26, 2011 at 8:16 pm

    @Brachiator: “By the way, a 2010 Economist article made the assertion that “Stephen Harper is counting on Canadians’ complacency as he rewrites the rules of his country’s politics to weaken legislative scrutiny.” Not a positive take on what was happening.”

    It’s more or less true and mostly the fault of the media as far as I can tell. The Sun is definitely right-wing and as close to Fox News as we get around here; everything they report in has a strong right-leaning slant. However, the rest of the news has been mostly mum on the Harper gov’t…

    …until about a month ago. In one week I heard more about what our government has been doing than I have in any given year of Harper’s time in office. The F-35 debacle, the defunding of public research and attempts to raid the public worker’s pension system, the Ova and oversight ombudsman debacle and a series of very small exercises of the PMO’s power to shift the balance of power into Harper’s favour.

    This may have an impact as it settles in. We’ll see as the month goes on.

    Fox News is taking a crack at Canadian audiences. However, they may run into a snag as soon as their channel hits the airwaves…

    “Quebecor [Fox News North corp, the people who run the Sun News media empire up here] should be required to … adhere to the Canadian Association of Broadcasters Code of Ethics for balanced news coverage and programming. The CRTC’s November 26 approval specifically included requirements that Sun News would adhere to the RTNDA Code of Journalistic Ethics and the Journalistic Independence Code as a member of the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council.”

    I suspect we’ll see them fail rather quickly.

  66. 66.

    dhd

    March 26, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    It’s a shame that the NDP are still, for no good reason that I can tell, considered “unserious”. Layton is the only national party leader who is actually popular in Quebec, and he is personally very popular here, even if the NDP has few viable candidates outside of Montreal… I’m hoping they win Gatineau this time around too.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - PaulB - Olympic Peninsula: Salt Creek Recreation Area & Kalaloch Beach
Image by PaulB (5/10/25)

Recent Comments

  • Ohio Mom on We Are Just Incubators (May 15, 2025 @ 5:48pm)
  • prostratedragon on We Are Just Incubators (May 15, 2025 @ 5:47pm)
  • Manyakitty on Political Wins Open Thread (May 15, 2025 @ 5:46pm)
  • Ohio Mom on We Are Just Incubators (May 15, 2025 @ 5:43pm)
  • Jay on Political Wins Open Thread (May 15, 2025 @ 5:42pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!