• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Dear elected officials: Trump is temporary, dishonor is forever.

Polls are now a reliable indicator of what corporate Republicans want us to think.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

This chaos was totally avoidable.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

You cannot shame the shameless.

I like political parties that aren’t owned by foreign adversaries.

Everybody saw this coming.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

You passed on an opportunity to be offended? What are you even doing here?

the 10% who apparently lack object permanence

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

With all due respect and assumptions of good faith, please fuck off into the sun.

I really should read my own blog.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / David Stockman is Shrill

David Stockman is Shrill

by Tom Levenson|  April 11, 201111:06 am| 18 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity, The Party of Fiscal Responsibility, I Can't Believe We're Losing to These People

FacebookTweetEmail

Via TPM:

“It doesn’t address in any serious or courageous way the issue of the near and medium-term deficit,” David Stockman told [Brian Beutler] in a Thursday phone interview. “I think the biggest problem is revenues. It is simply unrealistic to say that raising revenue isn’t part of the solution. It’s a measure of how far off the deep end Republicans have gone with this religious catechism about taxes.”

Stockman is still on the wrong side of critical issues — the architect of the Reagan deficits loves him some entitlement pain…

__

…but, as Beutler reports, he

…breaks faith over taxes and the GOP’s unwillingness to slash defense spending. And he laughs off the notion that the plan will do anything about unemployment, let alone dramatically reduce it, which Ryan and his plan claim it will. “This isn’t 1980. It’s not morning again in America. it’s late afternoon, or possibly even sunset.”

Oh noes! Someone dares to suggest that America may be exceptional only in the self-inflicted wounds that mark its decline.

__

As soon as I recover from my attack of neurasthenia, I’ll be sure to bestow some appropriately framed certificate of Moore-ishness upon this miscreant’s head.

__

Image: Alejo Fernández, The Scourging of Christ, before 1543

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Not Sure I Can Handle This
Next Post: What are we gonna do now? »

Reader Interactions

18Comments

  1. 1.

    Sad Iron

    April 11, 2011 at 11:10 am

    This would be a “Sullivan Award” winner for sure.

  2. 2.

    Joseph Nobles

    April 11, 2011 at 11:18 am

    This is deeper than Moore Award territory. Stockman is challenging the Grover.

  3. 3.

    patrick II

    April 11, 2011 at 11:19 am

    As right wing assholes go, Stockman was always the one who could count.

  4. 4.

    thomas Levenson

    April 11, 2011 at 11:21 am

    @patrick II: This.

  5. 5.

    dr. bloor

    April 11, 2011 at 11:34 am

    @patrick II: Pfft. Meyer Lanksy to Reagan’s Ben Siegel.

  6. 6.

    geg6

    April 11, 2011 at 11:40 am

    @patrick II:

    Yup. Gotta agree. Remember when Reagan had to take him out to the woodshed?

    Stockman’s power within the Reagan Administration waned after the Atlantic Monthly magazine published the famous 18,246 word article, “The Education of David Stockman”,[4] in its December 1981 issue, based on lengthy interviews Stockman gave to reporter William Greider. It led to Stockman’s being “taken to the woodshed by Reagan” as the White House’s public relations team attempted to limit the article’s damage to Reagan’s perceived fiscal-leadership skills. Stockman was quoted as referring to the Reagan Revolution’s legacy tax act as: “I mean, Kemp-Roth [Reagan’s 1981 tax cut] was always a Trojan horse to bring down the top rate…. It’s kind of hard to sell ‘trickle down.’ So the supply-side formula was the only way to get a tax policy that was really ‘trickle down.’ Supply-side is ‘trickle-down’ theory.” Of the budget process in his first year on the job, Mr. Stockman is quoted as saying: “None of us really understands what’s going on with all these numbers,” which was used as the subtitle of the article.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Stockman

    Poor David. Always telling the truth behind the curtain.

  7. 7.

    "Serious" Superluminar

    April 11, 2011 at 11:55 am

    It is simply unrealistic to say that raising revenue isn’t part of the solution.

    Exactly. Everyone proposing drastically slashing spending should be asked why they don’t want taxes to go up too, in order to close the deficit. Force them to admit they don’t actually like popular programs, or accuse them of “unseriousness” on the deficit, best chance for a winner here.

    Good post, brilliant art as always.

  8. 8.

    Elizabelle

    April 11, 2011 at 11:56 am

    It will be interesting to see if Stockman’s views get a wide airing.

    If we had a functional media, that wasn’t mistaken for “partisans” right and left, but respected, we could expect to see this widely and factually reported.

  9. 9.

    Ronc99

    April 11, 2011 at 12:01 pm

    Why are we dissing Stockman about entitlement “pain” when it is Obama who is negotiating way the best thing the Democratic party has ever done for this nation: entitlements.

    Entitlements didn’t cause our debt or deficits. Never-ending, unfunded wars, an unaudited Federal Reserve, Pentagon and 1000s of intelligence agencies combined with massive tax cuts to the rich and corporations, has caused this disaster. To which, Obama has joined the Republicans in that awful direction. This nation needed a JOBS program to get Americans back to work with the funds to back it up, not some catfood commission full of corporatists out to destroy the middle class and poor for the benefit of the richest.

    So to complain about others, including Republicans, is hypocritical my friends. Obama is on their *same* page. The public record reflects as much!!!

  10. 10.

    JGabriel

    April 11, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    @Elizabelle:

    It will be interesting to see if Stockman’s views get a wide airing.

    Probably not. I think Stockman is widely perceived as having “gone over to the other side” and is now too shrill to take seriously by the media.

    .

  11. 11.

    Elizabelle

    April 11, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    @JGabriel:

    In a normal society, someone who had gone over to the other side would deserve an especially good, serious (!) look — more than someone who never, ever changes one’s tunes.

    The disappointed formerly loyal are often where you find a measure of truth. Ignore them at your peril.

    This applies to Obama.

    And to John Cole.

    And to Stockman, Bruce Bartlett, John Delulio (sp?) many others …

  12. 12.

    Bruce S

    April 11, 2011 at 12:23 pm

    Stockman has been clear on this for quite a while – on the larger issue he wrote back in July of ’10 in the NYTs:

    “This debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party’s embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don’t matter if they result from tax cuts.”

    It seems that “authentic” conservatives like Stockman and Bartlett are clearer on the concept than most Dems, who don’t kick this back in the rancid GOPers face every time the deficit hysterics are used as a club to kill or hold hostage one or another of our puppies.

  13. 13.

    JGabriel

    April 11, 2011 at 12:28 pm

    Elizabelle:

    In a normal society …

    Heh. A-heh. Bahahahaha!

    I mean, I agree with you 100%. But, obviously we no longer live in anything approaching a normal or sane society, to the point where even positing otherwise seems hilariously ironic. This is a country where Paul Ryan is taken seriously and Paul Krugman is called shrill.

    .

  14. 14.

    El Cid

    April 11, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    In today’s establishment discussions of budget deficits, there simply is no such thing as revenue when it’s time to talk of balancing.

    When revenue is momentarily brought in, something which is really distasteful and hateful and unsophisticated to do, it has to be immediately dismissed as (a) a silly notion that we can ‘tax our way out of debt’, which is by fiat impossible; (b) a personal need to hurt our poor, rich, economy-supporting rich people; and (c) a lack of realizing that it’s fundamentally evil to generate revenue for the government, because government is evil, and revenue is theft.

  15. 15.

    Gian

    April 11, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    Strikes me that Logans Run, slightly modified to include a net worth test to live past 30 would be an ideal serious solution. It would fix unemployment if everyone not worth a couple million by age 30 was killed off. Would also eliminate social security and medicare.

  16. 16.

    Mnemosyne

    April 11, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    @Ronc99:

    Yes, why blame the drunk driver who ran head-on into your brother’s car when you can blame your brother for not driving more carefully?

  17. 17.

    gnomedad

    April 11, 2011 at 4:40 pm

    @geg6:

    Poor David. Always telling the truth behind the curtain.

    There will always be those who think they can get away with hanging on to just a little integrity. But it’s a cancer.

  18. 18.

    Cheryl from Maryland

    April 11, 2011 at 5:03 pm

    Tom, I love your use of Renaissance art from the edges of Europe.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by HinTN (5/22/25)

Recent Comments

  • Gin & Tonic on Thursday Evening Open Thread (May 22, 2025 @ 10:00pm)
  • Suzanne on Thursday Evening Open Thread (May 22, 2025 @ 9:54pm)
  • Sister Golden Bear on Thursday Evening Open Thread (May 22, 2025 @ 9:54pm)
  • dnfree on Wednesday Evening Open Thread: An Exemplar for Our Global Embarrassment (May 22, 2025 @ 9:54pm)
  • Suzanne on Thursday Evening Open Thread (May 22, 2025 @ 9:52pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!