• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Their freedom requires your slavery.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

After roe, women are no longer free.

In my day, never was longer.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Second rate reporter says what?

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

American History and Black History Cannot Be Separated

White supremacy is terrorism.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / Tonight There’s Gonna Be a Jailbreak

Tonight There’s Gonna Be a Jailbreak

by John Cole|  May 23, 20114:37 pm| 103 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, The War on Your Neighbor, aka the War on Drugs

FacebookTweetEmail

Interesting Supreme Court decision:

The Supreme Court ordered California on Monday to release tens of thousands of its prisoners to relieve overcrowding, saying that “needless suffering and death” had resulted from putting too many inmates into facilities that cannot hold them in decent conditions.

It is one of the largest prison release orders in the nation’s history, and it sharply split the high court.

Justices upheld an order from a three-judge panel in California that called for releasing 38,000 to 46,000 prisoners. Since then, the state has transferred about 9,000 state inmates to county jails. As a result, the total prison population is now about 32,000 more than the capacity limit set by the panel.

There are a lot of things at play here that make this a complicated debate. Obviously there is the California budget crisis and the inability to raise taxes, D-Day when he was at Calitics used to talk about the extraordinary power of the correctional officers union which has an incentive (it would seem) to keep as many people locked up as possible, there is the rise in the Prison-Industrial complex, and so on. If you are looking for informed commentary on the issue, this is the wrong place.

I do have a question, though- how many non-violent drug offenders are locked up in California prisons? Could that make a good dent in the prison population? And what if jails served as a place to rehabilitate people rather than to just lock them up, would there be less recidivism and fewer inmates? And how does the three strikes rule play out here?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Hey Guys! I Have An Idea! Watch This!
Next Post: Cancer is Toast, and Other Horrible Metaphors »

Reader Interactions

103Comments

  1. 1.

    Bulworth

    May 23, 2011 at 4:42 pm

    And how does the three strikes rule play out here?

    Three strikes is like wars and tax cuts–they pay for themselves.

  2. 2.

    trollhattan

    May 23, 2011 at 4:45 pm

    F*cking three strikes–how does it work?

    Lots and lots of non-violent offenders locked away and Corrections has moved away from a rehabilitation to a warehousing environment, so there’s a high recidivism rate (seven of ten within three years).

    The good news: Republicans are using this ruling to blame the mess on the Democrats.

    The California Republican Party, meanwhile, used the ruling as an opportunity to slam Democrats. Party Chairman Tom Del Beccaro said in a written statement that Democratic lawmakers have “failed in their most basic obligation to keep Californians safe by building adequate prisons.”

    More “adequate prisons” paid for, perhaps, using couch-cushion change .

  3. 3.

    pragmatism

    May 23, 2011 at 4:46 pm

    at least 40K of the nonviolent ones–bill signed earlier this year to transfer them to the counties. many of them in state prison due to 3 strikes.

  4. 4.

    MattR

    May 23, 2011 at 4:46 pm

    Scalia complained that “terrible things are sure to happen as a consequence of this outrageous order.”. Can one of the lawyers point me to the clause in the constitution that says that we are allowed to ignore parts of it whenever the real world consequences of adhering to it are difficult?

  5. 5.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    May 23, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    If we were serious about solving this, we’d lower tax rates for the wealthiest Americans and issue vouchers to our prison population. Allowing them to shop around for the cheapest prison stay would put downward pressure on incarceration costs and many would likely forgo necessary incarceration and therefore unburden the system.

  6. 6.

    piratedan

    May 23, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    well this is where that California ban on all things Arizona comes into play, they can’t ship them to Arizona to use all of those available beds in the private prison system…..

  7. 7.

    trollhattan

    May 23, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    Want to add that during the debates, Meg Whitman was asked about the death penalty and her answer included stepping up executions so we could save money by not building an expensive new death row. My kind of financial genius.

  8. 8.

    cyntax

    May 23, 2011 at 4:49 pm

    And how does the three strikes rule play out here?

    According to the Stanford Three Strikes Project:

    Over 4,000 inmates in California are serving life sentences under the Three Strikes law for non-violent crimes.
    __
    Past and current project clients have been given life sentences for minor offenses including stealing one dollar in loose change from a parked car, possessing less than a gram of narcotics, and attempting to break into a soup kitchen.

    Obviously more prisons are needed.

  9. 9.

    Han's Solo

    May 23, 2011 at 4:49 pm

    Non violent drug offenders should be released, especially those jailed on marijuana infractions.

    If California legalized weed and offered a limited clemency to all non violent offenders it would: 1) save money on jailing otherwise non-criminals (mostly) 2) Strike a major blow against the Mexican drug cartels 3) Generate billions in tax revenues, and, for the first time in the history of the world, users of a substance would cheer when hefty taxes are levied on said substance 4) save money on policing.

    Of course that makes way too much sense to ever fly in America.

    Sadly, I bet they release rapist and dog molesters, because people who smoke weed are icky.

  10. 10.

    Ruckus

    May 23, 2011 at 4:50 pm

    John. All of your points are good. Three strikes sounds like a good thing, get the criminals off the streets and all that. And it works, they are off the streets. But what’s next? And how many are basically railroaded off the streets by over zealous police/prosecutors looking to keep their numbers/subsidies up? Does it actually slow/stop crime?
    What does get to me is in the US that we have the highest rate of incarceration in the world. Why is that and what do we get for that? If we had fewer poor people would we have less crime?

  11. 11.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    May 23, 2011 at 4:51 pm

    Maybe we could balance out “three strikes and you’re out” with “four balls and you walk”.

  12. 12.

    The Dangerman

    May 23, 2011 at 4:52 pm

    I swear she said she was 18!

    What? Break? Nevermind. Carry on.

  13. 13.

    Bulworth

    May 23, 2011 at 4:52 pm

    Obviously more prisons are needed.

    As long as we cut taxes and cut gubmit spending.

  14. 14.

    Yevgraf (fka Michael)

    May 23, 2011 at 4:52 pm

    It isn’t just about drug offenses and three strikes inmates – it is about the duration of sentences on non-violent thefts, the idiot notion in rural areas about being harshly punitive on misdemeanors (thereby hanging records around the necks of 18 year olds), and overpolicing silly shit while ignoring the important.

  15. 15.

    The Bobs

    May 23, 2011 at 4:53 pm

    I usually read Mark Kleiman about this stuff, but he hasn’t commented about it yet.

  16. 16.

    Lojasmo

    May 23, 2011 at 4:55 pm

    How many nonviolent drug offenders?

    Lots.

  17. 17.

    Baron Jrod of Keeblershire

    May 23, 2011 at 4:55 pm

    We could easily solve this problem if we just let all the white people out of prison, but noooooo. Loony libs would cry racism like they always do…

  18. 18.

    Violet

    May 23, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    And what if jails served as a place to rehabilitate people rather than to just lock them up

    Are you asking the Citizens of California to spend their hard-earned money so that prisons can do the job that those criminals’ deadbeat parents should have done? And why didn’t the schools do their job? Why should the Citizens of California have to pay twice? If the criminals wanted to be educated and do something with their lives, they should have stayed in school and taken advantage of the opportunities they had then. Prisons aren’t parents and schools. Prisons are for punishment.

    ^^^ Those are pretty much the arguments against rehabilitation you’ll hear. The argument about the role of prisons (punishment vs. rehabilitation) has been going on a long time.

  19. 19.

    cyntax

    May 23, 2011 at 4:58 pm

    @Bulworth:

    Spending on prisons, the only kind of spending that’s OK for poor people!

  20. 20.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 23, 2011 at 4:59 pm

    @Yevgraf (fka Michael):

    overpolicing silly shit while ignoring the important.

    No banksters, stealing countless millions, are affected by any of this.

    Only “low class” offenders.

  21. 21.

    thefncrow

    May 23, 2011 at 4:59 pm

    You guys have seen the Scalia remarks in the dissent, right? Because, hoo boy, those are some telling remarks.

    Scalia starts by bitching at the court for not contorting existing law to find a way to prevent the injunction. I’m not really being fanciful with my language there, either: The so-called “textualist” is arguing for bending the language of the law any way necessary to force his preferred result:

    “There comes before us, now and then, a case whose proper outcome is so clearly indicated by tradition and common sense, that its decision ought to shape the law, rather than vice versa. One would think that, before allowing the decree of a federal district court to release 46,000 convicted felons, this Court would bend every effort to read the law in such a way as to avoid that outrageous result. Today, quite to the contrary, the Court disregards stringently drawn provisions of the governing statute, and traditional constitutional limitations upon the power of a federal judge, in order to uphold the absurd.”

    Scalia later tries to invoke the spectre of “big scary muscular black guys coming to get you”:
    “Most of them will not be prisoners with medical conditions or severe mental illness; and many will undoubtedly be fine physical specimens who have developed intimidating muscles pumping iron in the prison gym.”

  22. 22.

    Thoughtful Black Co-Citizen

    May 23, 2011 at 5:00 pm

    how many non-violent drug offenders are locked up in California prisons? Could that make a good dent in the prison population?

    A shit ton & Yes.

    And what if jails served as a place to rehabilitate people rather than to just lock them up, would there be less recidivism and fewer inmates?

    Years ago I read an excellent article about Japan’s prison system and their recidivism rates. In a nutshell, YES.

  23. 23.

    martha

    May 23, 2011 at 5:00 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead: What a wonderful world it would beeeee

  24. 24.

    Thoughtful Black Co-Citizen

    May 23, 2011 at 5:01 pm

    @thefncrow: “…and many will undoubtedly be fine physical specimens who have developed intimidating muscles pumping iron in the prison gym.”

    I had no idea Scally wrote blaxploitation p0rn.

    Fucking creep.

  25. 25.

    Jay in Oregon

    May 23, 2011 at 5:04 pm

    If you are looking for informed commentary on the issue, this is the wrong place.

    New tagline? :)

  26. 26.

    cleek

    May 23, 2011 at 5:06 pm

    @thefncrow:

    Scalia later tries to invoke the spectre of “big scary muscular black guys coming to get you”:

    non-black people can build muscles, too.

  27. 27.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 23, 2011 at 5:12 pm

    @Baron Jrod of Keeblershire:

    Um, Newt Gingrich is on line two, Baron, and he’s letting you know that you’re infringing on his trademarked talking points.

  28. 28.

    Chris

    May 23, 2011 at 5:13 pm

    And what if jails served as a place to rehabilitate people rather than to just lock them up, would there be less recidivism and fewer inmates?

    A few years ago, I had to do a ton of research on MS-13 for a college class, which included the reactions various governments had to the phenomenon.

    Don’t know if this has changed much, but at the time, the country that had had the most success by far handling the gang problem was Nicaragua – and just by coincidence, it also happened to be the only country that seriously invested in rehabilitation programs to give gang members other options once they left jailed. (The place is run by Dirty Fucking Lefties, I should point out – same guys we financed death squads against back in the good old Reagan years).

    The rest of the countries in the area, largely with U.S. and especially FBI prodding, had instituted strict “mano dura” laws with next to no rehabilitation on the side, ’cause that’s coddling delinquents which is bleeding heart bullshit. But those countries were doing a hell of a lot worse than Nicaragua was, and none of the Nixonian “law and order” laws appeared to be doing them much good.

  29. 29.

    jl

    May 23, 2011 at 5:13 pm

    @cyntax: thanks for that link.

    CA Dept of Correctiosn reports breakdown of new admissions by type of crime. Drug offenses in 2008 accounted for about 26% for men, and 33% for women.

    There are some graphs describing the two and three strikes population, but can’t do anything with them as presented. Somebody will have to type the numbers from the goofy USA Today style graphs into a spreadsheet.

    California Dept of corrections and Rehabilitation
    Corrections/Moving Forward
    http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/News/2009_Press_Releases/docs/CDCR_Annual_Report.pdf

    Pew Foundation stats on recent recidivism rates show CA to be horrible, almost 60%. From quick glance, that seems to be the second worst in the US, behind Utah at about 65%

    Look for ‘State of Recidivism’ Report on following URL:
    http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/initiatives_detail.aspx?initiativeID=59070

  30. 30.

    Agoraphobic Kleptomaniac

    May 23, 2011 at 5:13 pm

    @thefncrow: Scalia’s creepy writing is 1000% scarier than the release of the prisoners, thanks to his position on the court. Perhaps he’ll step down from the court one day and go write for Brietbart, perhaps dressing up for sting operations as an old person trying to bilk social security.

  31. 31.

    Cris (without an H)

    May 23, 2011 at 5:14 pm

    @cleek: non-black people can build muscles, too.

    White men can’t pump (iron)?

  32. 32.

    The Moar You Know

    May 23, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    The California Republican Party, meanwhile, used the ruling as an opportunity to slam Democrats. Party Chairman Tom Del Beccaro said in a written statement that Democratic lawmakers have “failed in their most basic obligation to keep Californians safe by building adequate prisons.”

    @trollhattan: WITH WHAT MONEY? We already spend more on prisons than our entire state college system!

    Through the intransigence of the Republicans, our state is now so far into the shitter that we may be shutting the schools for over half of next year. No shit. I almost wish they would just to make Nazi Party Mom and Dad have to decide which one gets to stay at home with their little sociopathic monsters as to not get their McMansion burned down.

    I love California but something fundamental about how this state is run has to be changed, because it’s not working anymore.

  33. 33.

    cat48

    May 23, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    Mark Halperin Prediction on Hardball

    Jon Huntsman will be the next prez of the US.. …

    I hope his predictions are wrong as usual.

  34. 34.

    Roger Moore

    May 23, 2011 at 5:18 pm

    @trollhattan:

    The good news: Republicans are using this ruling to blame the mess on the Democrats.

    In other news, water is wet.

  35. 35.

    Roger Moore

    May 23, 2011 at 5:20 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:
    You owe me a new keyboard.

  36. 36.

    Culture of Truth

    May 23, 2011 at 5:21 pm

    Scalia invokes original intent in the sense that the Founders were also scared of muscular specimens

  37. 37.

    Violet

    May 23, 2011 at 5:21 pm

    @cat48:

    Mark Halperin Prediction on Hardball
    __
    Jon Huntsman will be the next prez of the US.. …

    I can see him being right, but the next president not being elected until 2016. Obama wins re-election and that makes the next president the one who wins the following election.

  38. 38.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 23, 2011 at 5:24 pm

    @cat48:

    Well, by “next” he may mean in 2016.

    But there’s no way in hell that Huntsman can secure the nomination this cycle, because the crazies are on the loose and will make certain that someone who was a member of the Near Administration will not get the nomination.

    After the thorough buttkicking that will take place in 17 odd months, the GOP will realize that they can’t win with the crazy, which will provide Huntsman an opportunity.

  39. 39.

    Tonybrown74

    May 23, 2011 at 5:25 pm

    Has Mark Halperin ever been right?

  40. 40.

    Calouste

    May 23, 2011 at 5:25 pm

    @Ruckus:

    The US has not not just the highest incaceration rate in the world, it has a rate that is 7 to 10 times as high as most other OECD countries.

  41. 41.

    jl

    May 23, 2011 at 5:26 pm

    Report says that about 20% of second strikers in for drugs, about 15% of third strikers. About 45% of third strikers in for drugs for property crime.

    CA has a relatively strict and unforgiving third strike law when it comes to what counts towards three strikes. After the first qualifying conviction, pretty much anything can count.

    Cole’s bleg disguised as a post did not ask about parole. Parole has been almost nonexistent in CA under Davis and the Schwarzenenegger. Brown just released his review of parole board recommendations, and is following a more normal policy compared to other states. I don’t remember the numbers and don’t have time to look for them now.

    Edit: numbers read from the CA Dept of Corr. report’s goofy graphs, so only good to plus minus couple of percentage points.

  42. 42.

    Nomad

    May 23, 2011 at 5:26 pm

    @thefncrow:

    [The Supreme’s] “decision ought to shape the law, rather than vice versa”

    Anyone recall Scalia responding as such when questioned about legislating from the bench during confirmation hearings?

    PS: Thin Lizzy now running all around my brain.

  43. 43.

    pharniel

    May 23, 2011 at 5:27 pm

    There was a story on NPR a few months ago about how when Johnny Cash played Folsum it had a recidivism rate <10% and now has one in the 90's.

    ANd it was basically how the state had gutted rehabilitation programs and instead tried to cram more people in prison.

  44. 44.

    EconWatcher

    May 23, 2011 at 5:28 pm

    @trollhattan:

    True story: When I was single and doing criminal defense for a living, I went to a bar one night seeking female companionship–something I wasn’t very good at securing, particularly in the bar setting.

    Anyhoo, my luck seemed to change, because a surprisingly attractive young woman seemed surprisingly interested in me. When she found out what I did for a living, she asked what I thought of the death penalty. I said I wasn’t a fan, and gave a few quick anecdotes to show the unreliablity of the criminal justice system for sorting the guilty from the innocent.

    She then replied, and I quote, “But don’t you think the death penalty is a good solution for prison overcrowding?”

    I sat stunned for a moment, as I contemplated the question, could I possibly sleep with someone who just said that? Yes, I’m desperate, but am I THAT desperate?

    And then I sadly made some excuses and beat a quick retreat.

  45. 45.

    merrinc

    May 23, 2011 at 5:31 pm

    @thefncrow:

    Scalia later tries to invoke the spectre of “big scary muscular black guys coming to get you”:

    Will that man never DIE?

  46. 46.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    May 23, 2011 at 5:31 pm

    Anyone given any thought to turning Oklahoma into a penal state and taking advantage of the highest rate of tornadoes per square mile in the US?

  47. 47.

    cyntax

    May 23, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    @jl:

    Yeah the CADC is a bit out of control with those 3D graphics; Professor Tuftee would not be pleased.

    I was checking out the section on adult education. It’s interesting how they switch to using raw numbers there instead of the trend lines and percentages used elsewhere. The most obviously useful data would be to see what percentage of the prison population is using these programs, and whether the rate of recidivism for that cohort is lower than the over-all population. Strangely such data is absent.

  48. 48.

    jl

    May 23, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    forgot to mention, that CA Dept Corr. report says average age of second and third strike population is about 40. That seems very ancient compared to rest of prison population with is very heavily weighted towards those in 20s and 30s.

    Eyeballing graph, looks like maybe 20 or more percent of three strkers over 50. Will try to get reliable numbers out of goofy graph later since I am curious now. about a quarter of CA population 50 plus. That would be wild if proportion of 50 plus three strikers was close to proportion in general population. Very old for a prison population of any kind.

  49. 49.

    Poopyman

    May 23, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead: Thank you, Reverend Jonathan Swift.

  50. 50.

    Thoughtful Black Co-Citizen

    May 23, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    @EconWatcher: Wow. Just … Yuck.

    At least you don’t have to live with the shame of having had sex with Michelle Malkin.

  51. 51.

    Steeplejack

    May 23, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    I think it is an offense against humanity that we have private, for-profit prisons in this country. It makes me sick.

    Does anyone know when and how that got started? Would have been easier to nip it in the bud.

  52. 52.

    superking

    May 23, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    I’m not informed either, and I think those are all good questions. I would only add that the number of non-violent drug offenders in prison (as opposed to your local jail) is really low. People don’t usually go to prison for possession alone, unless it is a really b iv quantity of drugs. Now they might spend a few days in jail for having a joint on them, depending on their criminal history, but so will Uncle Jim Bob when he gets in a fight with Cooter down at Luke’s Slop N’ Suds.

  53. 53.

    merrinc

    May 23, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    @cat48:

    Halperin is a fucking moron. Have all his former journalism profs committed suicide in utter despair?

  54. 54.

    Jazz Superluminar

    May 23, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    Scalia:

    There comes before us, now and then, a case whose proper outcome is so clearly indicated by tradition and common sense, that its decision ought to shape the law, rather than vice versa.

    For those of us keeping score at home, this is the same guy who thought it wrong to intervene to keep a clearly innocent man from being executed, right?

  55. 55.

    jon

    May 23, 2011 at 5:38 pm

    We have a similar overcrowding issue in Arizona. Guess what our plan is? Throw some back to the county jails.

    Same “solution” for California. Welcome to those “unfunded mandates”, counties. When it hits closer than the state level, the fun begins. Enjoy those property tax rate increases… oh wait, nevermind. Enjoy the next round of lawsuits, I guess.

    But let’s keep on ignoring the sentencing, the “truth-in-sentencing”, and the “war on drugs” stuff. Nothing to see here, move along.

  56. 56.

    jl

    May 23, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    IIRC, a slew of undisciplined regression analysis done by glibertarian economists 20 or 30 years ago advocated the lock em up approach to corrections and rehabilitation based on a social cost benefit rationale.

    There is a slew of these gibertarian type economists in CA academics, especially in Southern California. This all happened when I was a snot nosed kid, but my impression of reading about it is that this policy recommendation was sold very hard and successfully in CA. The same bunch has been fighting subsidized public higher education in CA for decades, and want Cal State and UC tuition to cover full costs on the theory that if a kid was worth educating, the market would find a way to get him or her the needed tuition funds.

    CA is not very liberal on average when it comes to economic policy. I remember seeing a graph showing CA public attitudes on economic policy in dead center of US opinion.

    So, despite CA’s reputation, the prison situation in CA is another glibertarian reactionary experiment gone wrong. IMHO also too.

  57. 57.

    EconWatcher

    May 23, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    @Thoughtful Black Co-Citizen:

    The horror, the horror!

  58. 58.

    Yukkurishiteittene

    May 23, 2011 at 5:41 pm

    Scalia is so laughably transparent in his opinions. You can practically TASTE in every word his racism, sexism, homophobia, and general hatred (for anyone not white, male and wealthy, that is).

    The Supreme Court should have a sound system wired up to play Yackety Sax any time he enters, leaves, or speaks.

  59. 59.

    PIGL

    May 23, 2011 at 5:45 pm

    @Culture of Truth:

    Scalia invokes original intent in the sense that the Founders were also he and his black-shirted ilk are to-a-man scared of besotted with muscular massive, engorged specimens.

    FIFY.

    America has become an open celebration of perversion, cruelty and death.

  60. 60.

    Sloegin

    May 23, 2011 at 5:47 pm

    3-strikes is a huge chunk Of Kalifornia’s mess. Washington state has a huge burden as well with its 3-strikes, but at least Washington’s is for violent crime, not all crimes.

    When the voting population thinks they know how to handle criminal law better than the people put in charge of it, all it does is create a giant fiscal black hole.

    The problem isn’t enough prisons, it’s stupid law.

  61. 61.

    Omnes Omnibus

    May 23, 2011 at 5:48 pm

    @PIGL: I don’t know about that, boyo. In this particular case, the Supreme Court ordered the release of the prisoners. Scalia’s side lost this one.

  62. 62.

    fasteddie9318

    May 23, 2011 at 5:49 pm

    The California Republican Party, meanwhile, used the ruling as an opportunity to slam Democrats. Party Chairman Tom Del Beccaro said in a written statement that Democratic lawmakers have “failed in their most basic obligation to keep Californians safe by building adequate prisons.”

    Goddamn that fucking socialist Democrat Schwarzenegger for not building vast new prisons to protect Californians from weed smokers! Between him and that Democrat bastard Bush, this whole country is going to hell in a handbasket!

  63. 63.

    trollhattan

    May 23, 2011 at 5:49 pm

    @EconWatcher:

    Ugh. Tactical retreat seems like the only response for anybody not turned on by sociopathy.

    She then replied, and I quote, “But don’t you think the death penalty is a good solution for prison overcrowding?”

    I suppose when the crack team of Shrub and Gonzo were keeping the Texas death house rockin’ they were making a pretty good dent in the death row population. When I think about it, that was probably Shrub operating at his highest level of competence.

  64. 64.

    jl

    May 23, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    In an attempt to talk like a VSP, I make this final comment: you people should quit whining. A lot of states make some big bucks by housing CA inmates. We are stimulating your economies! CA does and does and does for you people and what do we get? Whines and complaints and badmouthing.

    You ingrates.

  65. 65.

    Roger Moore

    May 23, 2011 at 5:53 pm

    @merrinc:

    Will that man never DIE?

    Preferably in some way that’s both embarrassing and takes Clarence Thomas down with him? I’m a fatal car crash after a drug fueled rampage might be a nice ending.

  66. 66.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 23, 2011 at 5:55 pm

    @trollhattan:

    When I think about it, that was probably Shrub operating at his highest level of competence

    I believe he passed that threshold when he left the Yale cheerleading squad.

  67. 67.

    Agoraphobic Kleptomaniac

    May 23, 2011 at 5:56 pm

    Halprin is a rube. Huntsman is already pulling a McCain, taking his previously reasonable positions and reversing them to appeal to the crazies. All of those who thought he was pretty awesome for a republican govenor (like me, who cheered his fight to try to remove sales tax on food, but lost to the crazy state legislature) are already seeing the man who once was reasonable and not so bad, is already becoming a shell of a person who has no real principles he won’t sell out for a crazy person’s vote.

  68. 68.

    geemoney

    May 23, 2011 at 6:01 pm

    Since we’re going with uninformed commentary, I offer up this excellent song:

    System of a Down – Prison Song

  69. 69.

    jl

    May 23, 2011 at 6:02 pm

    @Agoraphobic Kleptomaniac:

    And like me too. I thought Huntsman might be a GOP candidate that would allow me to sleep well at night, but he is pulling a Mitt (I think Mitt is better parallel than McCain).

    I had not kept up with Huntsman’s groveling to the reactionaries: lying about his position on Obama stimulus, dancing toward vaguely supporting Ryan ‘budget plan’, or maybe not, as he balances general voter polls and what he needs to do to poll above zero in primary races.

    Seems to me Huntsman had no chance in primary or caucuses, so probably all hypothetical anyway.

  70. 70.

    Dennis SGMM

    May 23, 2011 at 6:03 pm

    There comes before us, now and then, a case whose proper outcome is so clearly indicated by tradition and common sense…

    Now we know the process that produced the Citizens United decision: Fat Tony decided what the proper outcome was and then wrote the reasoning for it.

  71. 71.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 23, 2011 at 6:03 pm

    @Agoraphobic Kleptomaniac:

    is already becoming a shell of a person who has no real principles he won’t sell out for a crazy person’s vote.

    Yup, pretty much like how McCain sold out everyone who was in the Hanoi Hilton with him by backing the deserting coward malassministration “enhanced interrogation techniques” policy in order to get the 2008 nomination…along with conceding to the crazies on other issues as well.

    McCain’s been seeing the light, recently, on torture, which is good for him…I guess he realizes how wrong he was to sacrifice his sacred honor to fuel his ambition, but I gotta tell you John, it’s too late. The water is under the bridge. You can mitigate the stain, but it will never go away.

  72. 72.

    JPL

    May 23, 2011 at 6:04 pm

    @jl: IMO…The crazies will split the vote. That leaves Huntsman or Romney to pick up the pieces. Majority wins so who knows.

  73. 73.

    Mnemosyne

    May 23, 2011 at 6:14 pm

    @Thoughtful Black Co-Citizen:

    I must be irretrievably frivolous, because I read that and this quote immediately sprang to mind:

    Homer: “I had to do a stupid Kabuki play about the 47 Ronin. I wanted to be Yoshi but they made me Ori.”

  74. 74.

    PIGL

    May 23, 2011 at 6:14 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: yes, of course, the court order is a good thing. But will it last? How come it’s even necessary? How does a man like Scalia become a Supreme in the first place? That’s more what I was getting at. How can the GOP command a majority of the House, and threaten to take the Senate, unless the country is in the grip of a death cult?

    I suppose a better metaphor would be of a Bradburyesque three-ring circus, in the right wing of which unspeakable acts were performed and boastfully trumpted. The middle ring would be a bunch of concerned serious media-type paying respectful attention to the right ring, and all but ignoring the left, except on those rare occaisions when wrong should fail and right prevail.

  75. 75.

    danimal

    May 23, 2011 at 6:22 pm

    The talk radio crowd is just hoping that prison violence will winnow down the prison population. Oh, and prisoners don’t deserve health care, because that costs money, donchaknow? These are the most common conservative responses to prison crowding. Either they don’t really think the issue through, or they are monstrous human beings. (OK, those two options are not mutually exclusive, some don’t think it through AND are monsters, so sue me.)

    I don’t condone crime (DUH-who does?) but we owe a minimal standard of living for incarcerated persons. The fact that every conservative I know would give me an hour’s argument before agreeing to that last sentence is all you need to know about right-wingers these days.

  76. 76.

    Judas Escargot

    May 23, 2011 at 6:23 pm

    @Han’s Solo:

    Sadly, I bet they release rapist and dog molesters, because people who smoke weed are icky.

    Even more sadly, this is because your modern GOP partisan hack has more in common psychologically/emotionally with the rapist dog molester than with the dirty hippie pot-smoker.

    Just sayin’.

  77. 77.

    Tulip

    May 23, 2011 at 6:24 pm

    Couple of things. One it’s hard to find real data on this (or my Googling skillz are lacking)

    In 2005 PPIC said the following:

    “Since 1994, increasing numbers of prisoners have been sentenced under the Three Strikes law – currently, 5 percent are “third strikers,” serving 25 years to life, while 21 percent are “second strikers,” serving double the normal sentence for a second felony conviction.”

    and

    “A growing majority of admissions are returns to prison for new crimes or parole violations, as opposed to new admissions – 67 percent were return admissions in 2004, compared to 59 percent in 1990.”

    CALIFORNIA’S CHANGINGPRISON POPULATION

    And in a 2006 Washington Post article it says:

    “In 1977, then-Gov. Jerry Brown (D), responding to a worries about rising crime, did away with indeterminate sentencing. Three years later, state lawmakers enacted legislation that said the purpose of incarceration was punishment alone, formally writing rehabilitation and treatment out of the penal code. (Brown is today running for state attorney general on a platform that calls for sentencing procedures that would lower prison population.

    California’s Crisis In Prison Systems A Threat to Public

    Not sure what it all means… only slightly over 50% of the prison population is incarcerated because of violent crimes and it is aging. The whole thing is such a mess. It’s such a mess I actually agree with the ruling of the SCOTUS. Well except for Scalia. Geez, what a surprise.

  78. 78.

    Martin

    May 23, 2011 at 6:24 pm

    Thank goodness. We’ve needed to release a shitton of non-violent inmates for ages. Too bad we’ll just fill the place up again since 3 strikes is still on the books.

  79. 79.

    Omnes Omnibus

    May 23, 2011 at 6:31 pm

    @PIGL:

    But will it last?

    Of course it will last. The Supreme Court is the final arbiter in this case. The District Court order will now be enforced.

    How come it’s even necessary?

    Politicians are scared to do anything that would cause them to be perceived as soft on crime. State courts with elected judges and politically ambitious prosecutors are the same. Federal courts with judges who have lifetime appointments don’t always have those concerns.

    As far as your other questions go, I think a death cult is a bit too far. Most people do not follow politics closely enough to understand issues. They are trying to live their lives and take care of their families. This is, of course, something the the Right is making more and more difficult. This means that the people heave even less time to spend following politics. And so on. At the same time, the Right (and if they are the death cult of which you speak, I have fewer issues with what you say) has huge amounts of money to spend on offering simple explanations to the people who spend little time on politics. The answers from the center and the left are complicated because they are actually trying to resolve complicated questions.

  80. 80.

    fasteddie9318

    May 23, 2011 at 6:33 pm

    Doesn’t California have privatized prisons? Has nobody considered the impact of this draconian decision to release revenue streams prisoners on the heroic Galtian heroes of the private prison industry? HOW ARE THESE COURAGEOUS MAKERS SUPPOSED TO SURVIVE THE REPEATED INTERFERENCE OF THE TAKERS?

  81. 81.

    PIGL

    May 23, 2011 at 6:52 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: The Right and their roaders are largely the death cult of which I speak. “Southern Death Cult on the Skids”, as it were.

    And yet, I was waiting for someone here to chime in with “do the crime, do the time”. With the exception of the far left and some libertarians, who is opposed to the war on drugs, who is opposed to draconian sentences, who defends womens rights? The Southern Death Cult is the source of the zombie infection, but the center ring has nearly been conquered, it seems.

    I will stop now before I murder anymore metaphors.

  82. 82.

    Ruckus

    May 23, 2011 at 7:02 pm

    @Calouste:
    Thank what/who ever for our puritan culture, basis of a lot of our laws, religious bullshit, and fear of everything. The europeans told them to fuck off centuries ago so they came here to do their stuff. And we are still paying for it. How did prohibition work out? We have the alcohol back but in a lot of states the laws are still screwy. Banning it didn’t work, as usual. Banning substances or activities that people want to do never does. Alcohol, drugs, “underage” sex and… Other countries learn this, but not us.
    One of my favorite lines in a movie is from Men in Black when Tommy Lee Jones tells Will Smith that persons are not stupid but people are. I believe that is because most of us are by nature, followers. And we follow those that sound like strong leaders, even if they lead us down a pretty crappy path. We need to change the balance and find some actual strong leaders, something that the liberal side of the isle has had in very short supply for some time. Notice that I did not say the conservatives have strong leaders, they just yell louder.

  83. 83.

    Tonal Crow

    May 23, 2011 at 7:06 pm

    @Yevgraf (fka Michael): It’s also about too many criminal laws. It’s time to scrub victimless crimes from the codes, and to carefully evaluate how we should treat the remaining crimes.

  84. 84.

    dday

    May 23, 2011 at 7:07 pm

    Some fun stats:

    The CCPOA (prison guards union) supported 108 candidates in California in 2010. 105 of them won.

    The CA legislature has passed 1,000 sentencing laws since 1978. All of them increased sentences.

    As of 2008, 2/3 of all cases of recidivism – inmates re-entering prison – were due to technical parole violations. Like missing a scheduled meeting.

    Incidentally, how three strikes affects the prison system the most is how it makes the prison population older. This makes prison health care more expensive, forcing cutbacks to the system to keep on budget. The lack of personnel, then, leads to preventable deaths among the prison population (112 in the last couple years). This was the crux of the case against California, that these preventable deaths represented cruel and unusual punishment.

  85. 85.

    burnspbesq

    May 23, 2011 at 7:45 pm

    @PIGL:

    Southern Death Cult on the Skids

    Southern Culture on the Skids’ lawyers would like a word with you. Something about libel, slander, damage to reputation, trademark infringement, and the like.

  86. 86.

    burnspbesq

    May 23, 2011 at 7:47 pm

    @MattR:

    Scalia complained that “terrible things are sure to happen as a consequence of this outrageous order.”. Can one of the lawyers point me to the clause in the constitution that says that we are allowed to ignore parts of it whenever the real world consequences of adhering to it are difficult?

    Wait, what? You thought Scalia was a principled originalist?

    How quaint.

  87. 87.

    danimal

    May 23, 2011 at 7:49 pm

    @dday: Does anyone else find it ironic that the biggest supporters of tough on crime legislation/initiatives for the past 20 years has been CCPOA?

    All the tough-minded conservative pols have supported a….union (gasp!)…without a second thought. Not just a union, but one of those dreadful, tax-guzzling public employee unions! The evilest of the evil! And they still have no clue that THEY (the CA conservatives) have been played like a fiddle by CCPOA. Every time a harsh sentencing initiative comes up for a vote, conservatives will back it to the hilt, further enriching the prison guards union.

  88. 88.

    CRA

    May 23, 2011 at 8:02 pm

    Thin Lizzy:

    “Tonight there’s gonna be a jailbreak
    Somewhere in this town”

    Psst… it’s goin’ down at the JAIL
    (That lyric always bugged me a bit)

  89. 89.

    FlipYrWhig

    May 23, 2011 at 9:20 pm

    @cat48: This is excellent news! For John McCain!

  90. 90.

    White Trash Liberal

    May 23, 2011 at 9:21 pm

    The grousing about 3 strikes is important, but an important criticism is missing from this thread: mandatory minimums. The ability to sentence has been taken out of a judge’s hands for even minor drug possession charges in California.

  91. 91.

    mclaren

    May 23, 2011 at 9:44 pm

    As of 1997, 57% of California inmates were in prison for non-violent crimes.

    Personal story about California’s three strikes law: an acquaintance of mine got thrown in prison for a mandatory minimum of 20 years under California’s three strikes law. His two prior offenses? 1) at age 17 he used a phony ID to buy drinks in a bar, got busted, and plead to a felony; 2) he got caught with more an ounce of weed in college and plead it out in return for parole etc.; 3) he beat up his girlfriend.

    Did the guy deserve prison time? For number 3, definitely. 20 years with no parole? You be the judge.

  92. 92.

    El Cid

    May 23, 2011 at 10:04 pm

    @danimal: It’s funny — the anti-unionists I know don’t seem to think of police or firefighters or C.O. unions as “unions”. Some of them clearly state that.

    You know the routine. They aren’t like your terrible company unions which make companies pay a worker 4 times the wage of his hard-working cousin while paying for the union boss to go to fancy vacations, and that worker only has to work 10 hours a week and no one can say nothing to him or the union blah blah blah.

    It’s that they don’t see the P/F/C.O. unions striking, or looking like or sounding like the unions they’ve seen or been told about or imagined.

    They really do see those unions as different. More like some sort of guys who do these dangerous jobs having to stick together so that the gubmit byurokraps give ’em what they earn. But if they don’t, they don’t walk off the job and hold those responsibilities up.

  93. 93.

    Mike G

    May 23, 2011 at 10:50 pm

    @danimal:

    All the tough-minded conservative pols have supported a….union (gasp!)…

    Cops and prison guards magically don’t count as evil public employee unions, just like 50% of the world’s military spending magically doesn’t count as Big Government.

    Both involve abusing brown people, so it’s all OK with Republicans.

  94. 94.

    Fucen Pneumatic Fuck Wrench Tarmal

    May 23, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    @MattR:

    i believe you would cite bush v gore, as precedent if you are arguing that point.

  95. 95.

    pkdz

    May 23, 2011 at 10:56 pm

    “If our nation were to return to the rates of incarceration we had in the 1970s, we would have to release 4 out of 5 people behind bars.” –Michelle Alexander

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/15/opinion/15alexander.html

  96. 96.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    May 23, 2011 at 11:09 pm

    @danimal:

    A few of my customers work for the Cali prison system as guards and I’m sure I will be hearing the whining from them about this. A couple of them talk of the prisoners as if they are animals and one seems to derive a bit too much happiness teaching them about his authoritah.

    California dreamin’? More like California nightmare.

  97. 97.

    Fucen Pneumatic Fuck Wrench Tarmal

    May 23, 2011 at 11:29 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    “a man once told me to walk with the lord, i’d rather walk with the bases loaded.”

  98. 98.

    bob h

    May 24, 2011 at 6:44 am

    Yes, maybe it is time to rethink incarceration of non-violent drug offenders. And maybe women jailed for prostitution could be let out, too.

  99. 99.

    Pug

    May 24, 2011 at 8:24 am

    As of 2008, 2/3 of all cases of recidivism – inmates re-entering prison – were due to technical parole violations. Like missing a scheduled meeting.

    This is the real reason for such high recidivism rates. Everyone completing their sentence in California is on parole for three years, so they are not really out of the system.

    Let’s face it, a lot of these guys are fuck ups. That’s how they ended up in the joint in the first place. They don’t make it through three years of drug tests and parole officer visits and they end up back in Folsom for a while.

  100. 100.

    lawguy

    May 24, 2011 at 9:24 am

    @The Dangerman: How old was she? 47. Thank you Benny Hill.

  101. 101.

    negative 1

    May 24, 2011 at 10:10 am

    @Calouste: Just curious — how many OECD lists can we slip to the middle of before they just start calling us a 3rd world country? I’m struggling to find ones that we’re in the top 10 for that aren’t GDP.

  102. 102.

    djesno

    May 24, 2011 at 11:28 am

    @Just Some Fuckhead: HERE, HERE, old chap!

  103. 103.

    currants

    May 24, 2011 at 6:54 pm

    @Dennis SGMM: MOST of his decisions read that way. And when the ruling doesn’t go his way, his dissents give you the same sense you get from a 5 yr old’s temper tantrum (i.e. shriekingly angry).

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Odie Hugh Manatee on Saturday Night Maxwell Update (Mar 26, 2023 @ 4:15am)
  • Rose Weiss on Saturday Night Maxwell Update (Mar 26, 2023 @ 4:02am)
  • Deputinize Eurasia from the Kuriles to St Petersburg on Saturday Night Maxwell Update (Mar 26, 2023 @ 3:59am)
  • yellowdog on Pudd’n Boots (Open Thread) (Mar 26, 2023 @ 3:58am)
  • Odie Hugh Manatee on Saturday Night Maxwell Update (Mar 26, 2023 @ 3:52am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!