• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

The words do not have to be perfect.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Putin dreamed of ending NATO, and now it’s Finnish-ed.

We still have time to mess this up!

Republicans would impeach Biden if he bit into a whole Kit Kat rather than breaking the sections apart.

This really is a full service blog.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

American History and Black History can not be separated.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

Everybody saw this coming.

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. don’t touch it.”

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

Cole is on a roll !

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

So many bastards, so little time.

Nothing says ‘pro-life’ like letting children go hungry.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

In after Baud. Damn.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2011 eh / Nobody Doesn’t Like Mitt

Nobody Doesn’t Like Mitt

by $8 blue check mistermix|  June 8, 20118:17 am| 106 Comments

This post is in: Election 2011 eh

FacebookTweetEmail

Nate Silver:

Since this race is a “least objectionable wins” situation, Mitt and T-Paw are looking pretty good.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Wednesday Morning Open Thread
Next Post: Why Weiner Should Stay Put »

Reader Interactions

106Comments

  1. 1.

    Randinho

    June 8, 2011 at 8:19 am

    Bachmann also rates high. That speaks volumes . . .

  2. 2.

    jwb

    June 8, 2011 at 8:23 am

    That chart is good news for the popcorn futures! Given this data, I’m going to go with Bachmann. Among other things, teatards will think that she is most likely to piss off liberals, which seems to be an important criterion these days.

  3. 3.

    Davo

    June 8, 2011 at 8:25 am

    What’s their beef with Huntsman?? ahhh… not pissing off enough Liberals… makes sense..

  4. 4.

    Third Eye Open

    June 8, 2011 at 8:26 am

    I am going dark-horse here. I think it will shake out to be Mittens and Cain. Possible ticket? Maybe…

    The GOP gets a religious minority and suave WASP with a side of ethnic Protestantism. I can guarantee they have ground-games which include bringing out the conservative black community and trying to meld that effort with the wider religious mobilization that I am sure Rove is involved with.

    I don’t think they will win against Obama, but that says nothing about down-ticket races. This election, much more than the recent past will be about mobilizing groups, and making the case that this election WILL have consequences. It seems to be the motto the Pubes are runnin’ with.

  5. 5.

    Hal

    June 8, 2011 at 8:29 am

    Why are people still dismissing Romney? I realize it’s a dream come true to have Bachman or Palin, but the “sensible” candidate always ends up winning. It’s true the crazy has gone up considerably during Bush and since then, especially once Obama arrived, but to me at least, all signs point to Romney.

  6. 6.

    4tehlulz

    June 8, 2011 at 8:30 am

    Bachmann/Mittens 2012

  7. 7.

    JPL

    June 8, 2011 at 8:30 am

    Mitt’s religion doesn’t appear to be a factor this time. They are just looking for a white man to run. His disastrous job creation skills will not hinder him.

  8. 8.

    Woodrowfan

    June 8, 2011 at 8:35 am

    Huntsman is intelligent, experienced, honest and educated. of course he’s less popular with Republicans than loons like Bachman, Cain and Santorum! Tells you everything you need know about the repukes..

  9. 9.

    me

    June 8, 2011 at 8:38 am

    The GOP really hates Gary Johnson. He’s like a pro choice Ron Paul.

  10. 10.

    Shalimar

    June 8, 2011 at 9:07 am

    I am surprised that 88% of South Carolina Republicans polled know who Gary Johnson is to find him objectionable. I find that very hard to believe.

    @Woodrowfan: Honest? This would be the same Huntsman who has been lying his ass off the last few weeks about his past positions?

  11. 11.

    Joseph Nobles

    June 8, 2011 at 9:07 am

    @Hal: “the “sensible” candidate always ends up winning”

    The 2000 Republican primary should make you hang your head in shame for saying such a thing. Dubya the “sensible” candidate? Horsefeathers.

    Bachmann and Cain score so low on unfavorables because the general public isn’t as aware of them. Let’s see what happens after a couple of debates. Cain’s favorables did rise after the last debate.

    However, Romney scoring so well in unfavorables despite being a known quantity does speak very well for his chances. Pawlenty will drop out before Santorum does.

    The all-seeing Nobles sees all.

  12. 12.

    Guster

    June 8, 2011 at 9:10 am

    @Hal: RomneyCare is a big hit. Mormonism is a smaller one, but with an important block.

  13. 13.

    JPL

    June 8, 2011 at 9:14 am

    Think Progress had this little poll

    More than a third of voters “have some qualms” about a Mormon president, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll that could point to trouble for Mormon presidential hopefuls Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman. Overall, just 45 percent of voters had favorable views of Mormonism, while 32 percent had unfavorable ones.

    I would think the 32 percent who viewed the Mormon religion unfavorably would be evangelicals and it would also reflect in other polls but apparently not.

  14. 14.

    Dream On

    June 8, 2011 at 9:14 am

    It won’t be Romney. You heard it here first.

  15. 15.

    Woodrowfan

    June 8, 2011 at 9:15 am

    Honest? This would be the same Huntsman who has been lying his ass off the last few weeks about his past positions?

    OK, fair enough. I was comparing him on a sliding scale to the others on that list, but you are right.

  16. 16.

    Annelid Gustator

    June 8, 2011 at 9:18 am

    Rep. Bachmann in the top three? Wow, that is unexpected.

  17. 17.

    AAA Bonds

    June 8, 2011 at 9:19 am

    THAT’LL DO, PIG. THAT’LL DO

  18. 18.

    AAA Bonds

    June 8, 2011 at 9:20 am

    @Third Eye Open:

    I can guarantee they have ground-games which include bringing out the conservative black community

    LOLOLOLOLOLOL

  19. 19.

    AAA Bonds

    June 8, 2011 at 9:25 am

    @Shalimar:

    I am surprised that 88% of South Carolina Republicans polled know who Gary Johnson is to find him objectionable. I find that very hard to believe.

    My guess is that people are mixing him up with Gary Condit because every time I mention “Gary Johnson” someone around me does that (because there’s no reason to know who Gary Johnson is)

  20. 20.

    David

    June 8, 2011 at 9:26 am

    It appears that Palin can work at Fox and be a candidate.

  21. 21.

    jwb

    June 8, 2011 at 9:26 am

    @Annelid Gustator: All I needed to see was the fawning of our media over Sarah Palin’s recent road trip to realize that the Republican establishment fears Bachmann has a real chance. After having spent the last year cutting Palin down to suddenly become interested in her again—that only makes sense when you see it as a response to Bachmann’s recent surge. They are trying to use Palin to block Bachmann’s path. If Palin doesn’t officially get in soon, however, it won’t work, and I’m not even sure it will work if she does get in. My prediction: Bachmann will take Iowa and SC. Romney will take NH. Then it gets interesting.

  22. 22.

    Bulworth

    June 8, 2011 at 9:41 am

    Mitten’s Iowa negs are pretty bad.

  23. 23.

    NonyNony

    June 8, 2011 at 9:42 am

    @Shalimar:

    I am surprised that 88% of South Carolina Republicans polled know who Gary Johnson is to find him objectionable. I find that very hard to believe.

    I’d be surprised by that too, but that’s not what this poll shows.

    This poll shows that among South Carolina self-identified Republican voters who know who he is, 82% of them have a negative opinion of him. So imagine they polled thousands of SC voters and only 50 of them said “oh yeah I know that guy” – that would mean that 41 of those 50 had a bad opinion of Johnson.

    Without the commensurate name recognition data, I’m not sure what this particularly says about Johnson, Huntsman or any of the others at the bottom of the graph. If you click over on the PPP poll of SC, you see that the response for Johnson is actually 83% not sure, 14% unfavorable, and 2% favorable. That’s where the 88% comes from – among those who have an opinion about Johnson (16% of those polled) 14% have a negative opinion about him and 2% like him. Both groups are under the crazification factor limit, so I don’t think it says much about his chances at all.

    On the other hand, Romney is sitting with a 56% favorable and a 27% unfavorable with only 16% on the fence. Palin is sitting at a whopping 60% favorable 33% unfavorable with only 7% fencesitters. Name recognition isn’t impacting their percentages at all. And Bachmann has 45% favorable, 16% unfavorable and is still sitting with almost 40% in the fence-sitter category – so she could actually improve if some of those Sarah Palin fans decide they like her too.

  24. 24.

    Dennis SGMM

    June 8, 2011 at 9:45 am

    It seems a bit early in the game for polls to be predictive. One thing seems certain though; Republican voters can’t get enough batshit insanity on the economy, social issues, and the importance of being white.

  25. 25.

    Paul W.

    June 8, 2011 at 9:48 am

    Bachmann right now is the scariest candidate, she is almost a shoe-in for the GOP primary and because of the absolute stupidity of Palin the “intelligence” bar is set low enough for her to hop over… the media has already forgotten her crazy McCarthyesque comments in 2008. She can raise tons of money, get air time, and is loved by the base.

    That being said, Obama still defeats her given the current state of things and the 2008 ground team will hopefully be back in full force with an even more meager GOP effort to compete against. Just as a candidate, I’m going to call Bachmann and what will look like a closer election than we think right now.

    /pessimism hat

  26. 26.

    shortstop

    June 8, 2011 at 9:51 am

    @Dream On: It will be Romney. You heard it here…um, unfirst.

  27. 27.

    Third Eye Open

    June 8, 2011 at 9:55 am

    @AAA Bonds: Cain will probably not make it through, but this does set the stage for bringing in a black conservative who won’t go all hippity-hop on them in public. Allen West is a bit too crazy, and has far too many biker friends to allow near the levers of power, but Cain seems smart enough to throw a few bombs and raise money at the same time. It seemed to work for Palin, and she is far less mentally organized than Cain.

    Rove has a hurricane of cash to rain upon this next election. Do you not think they will try to discourage and wedge the AA community. Especially using the trusty ‘gay-marriage’ trope to whip up religious sentiment? Seems to have been the M.O. in the recent past…

  28. 28.

    shortstop

    June 8, 2011 at 9:56 am

    @Joseph Nobles: Bush was the nominee because to the business/establishment Repubs who decide these things, he was the sensible candidate. He simultaneously appealed to movement conservatives and the religious right — really, he was the perfect storm of a GOP candidate who could bring together those untidy factions, something we’re unlikely to see again. Failing that, the “sensible” candidate wins.

  29. 29.

    Fred

    June 8, 2011 at 9:57 am

    But but what about Romney care? I thought that was a non-starter with the Republitards?

  30. 30.

    Linda Featheringill

    June 8, 2011 at 9:59 am

    Who is Johnson?

  31. 31.

    Kirbster

    June 8, 2011 at 10:06 am

    A year ago, I thought it would be a Jeb Bush/Scott Brown ticket in 2012 (and I still think it’s a possiblity in 2016 if Brown keeps his Senate seat and Obama is re-elected), but now I’m seeing Mittens/Rubio as a likely pair. Rubio would be the geographic balancing/tea party/minority interest half of the GOP ticket, without a lot of baggage.

  32. 32.

    WyldPirate

    June 8, 2011 at 10:08 am

    @Guster: @Guster:

    RomneyCare is a big hit. Mormonism is a smaller one, but with an important block.

    You folks counting on Romney’s Mormonism to be a big turn-off with the FundieXian Crazies are going to be in for a big shock if he gets the nomination.

    Those people will hold their nose and vote for Romney over the Nasty Muslamofascist Negro Usurper that took their country away from them.

  33. 33.

    Fred

    June 8, 2011 at 10:10 am

    @WyldPirate: Yes we know Obama is smarter, richer, luckier, and better looking than you, and he is your president. And he is black. We know that makes you deeply hateful and eats away at your soul like a cancer.

    Thanks for reminding us. It warms our heart.

  34. 34.

    Whiskey Screams from a Guy With No Short-Term Memory

    June 8, 2011 at 10:13 am

    You folks counting on Romney’s Mormonism to be a big turn-off with the FundieXian Crazies are going to be in for a big shock if he gets the nomination.

    @WyldPirate: Glad to see you’re taking your meds again. This not only made sense, it’s the fucking stone cold truth. Romney’s Mormonism isn’t going to be an issue at all for many reasons, but the biggest one is…

    Those people will hold their nose and vote for Romney over the Nasty Muslamofascist Negro Usurper that took their country away from them.

    There will be plenty of other reasons GOP voters vote for Romney, but this is and always was going to be #1.

  35. 35.

    WyldPirate

    June 8, 2011 at 10:16 am

    @shortstop:
    I agree shortstop. Romney will be Obama’s opponent. The rest of the field is either too crazy or too boring and lacking in experience or both.

    Romney will win New Hampshire, probably won’t even try in Iowa and will lose South Carolina (because of the crazy shithouse rats living in that loony state).

    If the economy is stumbling along like it is now a year from now and Romney is Obama’s opponent, the electorate is going to be in a nasty, “throw the bums out” mood.

  36. 36.

    wonkie

    June 8, 2011 at 10:19 am

    I don’t think the Mormonism is that big a deal to anyone. I am surprised that Romney isn’t seen by the base as a pandering say-anything fake.After all he is a pandering say anything fake.

  37. 37.

    Redshift

    June 8, 2011 at 10:20 am

    @Third Eye Open:

    Rove has a hurricane of cash to rain upon this next election. Do you not think they will try to discourage and wedge the AA community. Especially using the trusty ‘gay-marriage’ trope to whip up religious sentiment? Seems to have been the M.O. in the recent past…

    Discourage, yes, but that’s a far cry from “bringing out the conservative black community.” There is a segment of the African-American community that is technically conservative (especially religiously), but the idea that that will align them with what Republicans have mangled the idea of conservatism into is laughable — for all their talk of “traditional values,” the modern conservative movement is all about free market fundamentalism, “I got mine” over community, racism, nativism, bigotry and xenophobia.

    Yes, there is some potential overlap in the areas of gay marriage and sometimes abortion, but when they’ve tried to turn that into support for their candidates, they’ve generally discovered to their dismay that African Americans aren’t stupid. (A classic example was the 2006 VA Senate race, when they got an anti-gay-marriage constitutional amendment on the ballot, and tried to use it to get African American votes. They did in fact get a higher AA turnout, some of whom voted for the amendment, but who pretty much all voted against George Allen.)

  38. 38.

    Fred

    June 8, 2011 at 10:23 am

    @WyldPirate: Once again proving your ignorance. Stick with the Teabagger schtick.

  39. 39.

    boss bitch

    June 8, 2011 at 10:24 am

    @WyldPirate:

    What’s up WildEyed?! Feeling good today? Seen any new polls you’d like to share? I have one.

    http://politicalwire.com/archives/2011/06/08/romney_opens_lead_for_gop_nomination.html

    A new Quinnipiac poll finds Mitt Romney leads in the race for the Republican nomination with 25%, followed by Sarah Palin at 15%, Herman Cain at 9%, Newt Gingrich and Rep. Ron Paul at 8%, Rep. Michele Bachmann at 6% and Tim Pawlenty at 5%.

    Said pollster Peter Brown: “Whether it’s because of the media coverage of his recent formal announcement, or the fact that Donald Trump and Mike Huckabee have dropped out, Gov. Romney has surged ahead of the Republican field. Until now Quinnipiac University’s polls have shown many candidates bunched together in the mid-teens, now he has opened up some daylight on the field and is within six points of the president.”

    However, in trial heats against President Obama, Romney still trails by six points, 47% to 41%, while every other candidate trails by double-digits.

    The title and body of the article is clearly slanted to make Romney look good but basically Obama is KICKING EVERYONE’S ASS!!

    Your welcome.

  40. 40.

    boss bitch

    June 8, 2011 at 10:26 am

    Just to be clear, polls this early don’t say much because the campaign has barely started and Obama has not started to campaign yet- not fully. I’d like to see how much damage the Repubs will do to Romney in the primaries.

  41. 41.

    cat48

    June 8, 2011 at 10:26 am

    NEW POLL Todays, Quinnipac has Obama 47 Mittens 41. Of course, this will not be covered.

  42. 42.

    Woodrowfan

    June 8, 2011 at 10:26 am

    what is wyldpirate saying that’s so wrong? The repuke voters would rather vote for a Mormon than for a black Democrat (one who many are deluded (or nuts) enough to think is a Marxist, Muslim, atheist. ) seems right to me.

  43. 43.

    cat48

    June 8, 2011 at 10:28 am

    @boss bitch:

    You beat me!

  44. 44.

    kindness

    June 8, 2011 at 10:31 am

    Yea but Bachman comes in third in this race. Bachman?!?

    Honestly you might as well run Palin if you’re going to go with Bachman. Two peas in a pod. So this poll may be viable for a Republican primary but obviously has nothing to do with a general election.

  45. 45.

    Tom Q

    June 8, 2011 at 10:39 am

    “Since this race is a “least objectionable wins” situation”

    Sorry, this phrase assume facts not in evidence — certainly not in evidence during the many 2010 GOP Senate primaries, where the least objectionable candidates got thrown over for lunatics time after time. I know everyone is counting on presidential year voting-levels preventing that outcome, and a return to the get-in-line tradition that made Dole & McCain nominees despite tepid party-roots support. But I see a posibility the GOP id escapes this year.

    Romney just has the whiff of Ed Muskie ’72, to me.

  46. 46.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 10:39 am

    why is GaJo so high? is it the bad toupeé or the joint EDK/GG/libertarian endorsement?

  47. 47.

    WyldPirate

    June 8, 2011 at 10:42 am

    @Fred:

    What the fuck are you talking about you dumb son of a bitch?

    I don’t hate Obama..I hate his goddamned policies in Afghanistan, I hate his kow-towing to Wall st and big business and I hate his insistance on negotiating with the lunatics on the right and lending legitmacy to their idiotic fucking memes that have destroyed the country.

    As a person and an individual, I admire him and the struggle he has to go through to accomplish what he has so far.

    As a leader, though, he flat-out fucking sucks.

    No kindly go take a flying leap up your own rectum you piece of shit.

  48. 48.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 10:43 am

    @Tom Q: Do you remember the evangelical pastors that took out a full page ad in the NYT threatening to secede from the GOP if Romney was on McCain’s ticket?
    nevah happen.
    There is segment of the WEC (white evangelical xian) demographic that would vote a Satan ticket before voting for a mormon.

  49. 49.

    artem1s

    June 8, 2011 at 10:46 am

    @boss bitch:

    that’s odd because last night NPR was saying polls had Mittens over Obama by a slight margin. Not saying its true and don’t remember which poll but it seemed to signal that the GOP deciders are tired of the Crazy Clown Circus and are now behind pushing the Romney brand. IMO he will be the nominee for better or worse and mostly because he has demonstrated he can raise huge amounts of cash for the party. It’s pretty obvious that the GOP is more vested in cash flow and making sure the war chest in full for 2014/2016 than winning the WH in 2012. Also.too congressional and state races.

  50. 50.

    WyldPirate

    June 8, 2011 at 10:47 am

    @Woodrowfan:

    They can’t stand anyone who dares to criticize President Immaculate Perfection, Woodrowfan.

    Many of the people that post here–(fred, ABL, General Stuck, etc.) here are just as blind and fucking stupid as the Palin worshipers.

  51. 51.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 10:49 am

    @Linda Featheringill: Who is Johnson?
    GaJo is the libertarian mancrush this year.
    GG and Sully dig him too.

  52. 52.

    WyldPirate

    June 8, 2011 at 10:52 am

    @boss bitch:

    69% wrong track, 59% disapproval of Obama’s handling of the economy, 9+% U-3 and 16+% U-6 will trump that shit if it stays the same or gets worse.

    Cole’s tag of “Black Jimmy Carter” is going to be prophetic. The Rethugs are already starting to wrap the economy–which is his now, not Bush’s no matter how harder Obama tries to say it is Bush’s fault–around his neck. It will be the anchor that sinks him, too.

  53. 53.

    jwb

    June 8, 2011 at 10:53 am

    @Kirbster: If it is Romney, I think he’ll go with Perry as his VP.

  54. 54.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 10:55 am

    @WyldPirate: that is a lie.
    no one is as pithed as a Palinista.
    Do you see ABL or the General trying to subvert Wikipedia in support of O?

  55. 55.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 10:56 am

    @jwb: i think a Perry/Palin or Palin/Perry ticket is more likely. They are homies.

  56. 56.

    jwb

    June 8, 2011 at 10:57 am

    @WyldPirate: I have a strong suspicion that anyone who did what it took to win the presidency as a Democrat would suck as a leader in your eyes.

  57. 57.

    WyldPirate

    June 8, 2011 at 10:58 am

    @wonkie:

    “Pandering say-anything fake” is the description of all politicians that aspire to the Presidency and most any other political office.

  58. 58.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 11:00 am

    @WyldPirate: guess what IS still Bush’s.
    Iraq.
    The conservative elites welded Iraq onto Bush when they were trying to scrape him off their shoe for the teabagger event.
    When Iraq plants a boot in America’s ass in December and we lose the three largest and most expensive foreign airbases ever built with taxpayer monies, Bush gets the blame.
    He wrote the SOFA that is kicking us out.

  59. 59.

    shortstop

    June 8, 2011 at 11:03 am

    @Tom Q: Well, that’s the interesting question–will they revert to their usual MO in a presidential race, or are they now so far gone that all bets are actually off on who gets it? I’m pretty sure it’s the former because of who bankrolls all this, but not quite sure enough to put money on it.

  60. 60.

    jwb

    June 8, 2011 at 11:03 am

    @Ghanima Atreides: As I said above, I’m now putting my money on Bachmann over Palin; in that match-up I believe that Bachmann wins and in a direct show down with Romney, either Palin or Bachmann would win. It’s possible that if neither can get the upper hand Palin and Bachmann might end up eliminating each other, in which case Romney might slip through. If Bachmann is in, I don’t see any space for Perry given that Palin—whether she’s in or out—won’t declare herself until it would be too late to make room for Perry. At that point Perry’s only chance, which is not out of the realm of possibility, would be a brokered convention. I agree that if Palin was to win the nomination, Perry would be a natural VP choice.

  61. 61.

    WyldPirate

    June 8, 2011 at 11:09 am

    @Ghanima Atreides:

    Do you see ABL or the General trying to subvert Wikipedia in support of O?

    I wouldn’t put it past either one of them if it Obama was involved. ABL might be able to pull it off. general Stuck is too stupid to manage it.

    @jwb:

    I have a strong suspicion that anyone who did what it took to win the presidency as a Democrat would suck as a leader in your eyes.

    That would be because of the fact of what people have to go through to run the gauntlet to get to the Presidency.

    Decent, competent honest leaders with capabilities and the integrity to do what is right for the country wopn’t subject themselves to the process of running.

    Our political system and the media is set up for dirtbags to win and, with the cooperation of the idiotic voters who enable that sort of shit, will continue to ensure we get either complete manipulatable meatpuppets in office or scum.

    H.L Mencken nailed this years ago from the Baltimore Sun, 1920, via Wikipedia and reprinted in the “Carnivale of Buncombe”, By H.L Mencken:

    The larger the mob, the harder the test. In small areas, before small electorates, a first-rate man occasionally fights his way through, carrying even the mob with him by force of his personality. But when the field is nationwide, and the fight must be waged chiefly at second and third hand, and the force of personality cannot so readily make itself felt, then all the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre – the man who can most easily adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum.
    The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.[27]

  62. 62.

    Cris (without an H)

    June 8, 2011 at 11:12 am

    @Joseph Nobles: The 2000 Republican primary should make you hang your head in shame for saying such a thing. Dubya the “sensible” candidate? Horsefeathers.

    Remember those heady days in the winter of 1999 when we thought it could be John McCain vs Bill Bradley? Ah, memories.

  63. 63.

    Cris (without an H)

    June 8, 2011 at 11:17 am

    Holy smokes, it’s WyldPirate vs matoko-chan. This thread rules.

  64. 64.

    jwb

    June 8, 2011 at 11:18 am

    @Cris (without an H): W was an establishment candidate, however. He was brought in precisely to be an alternative to McCain. This time around the establishment is perfectly fine with Mittens. It’s the base who can’t stand the guy.

  65. 65.

    Tom Q

    June 8, 2011 at 11:19 am

    @shortstop: Certainly Big Money Talks prevailed in ’96, when Buchanan had a brief flurry in the early primaries, and the powers that be got together and coalesced around Dole despite lack of enthusiasm. McCain was a nearer thing: he benefitted from running against a field of further-right-ies in primaries where plurality wins gave him disproportionate numbers of delegates. Romney has competition on his side of the field — Huntsman and Pawlenty are also gunning for the “not 100% despicable” vote. Should the crazy right coalesce around one candidate, they could reverse McCain’s feat. Plus you have significant numbers on the right who honestly believe it was the fact that McCain didn’t go far enough in their direction that cost him the election — a conviction reconfirmed by their (erroneous) belief that the Tea Party, not the recession, was the major reason for their ’10 success. This could make them more resistant to go-along-to-get-along pleas.

    The reason I bring up Ed Muskie (and, yeah, I’m old enough to have lived through that race, albeit as someone too young — 18 — to have understood all the machinations at the time): the rationale for why Dems would line up behind him — because they hated Nixon to the depths of their souls and would forego all else to effect his defeat — is precisely the reasoning I’m hearing today for Romney. But Muskie had, for the truly lefty wing, committed an unforgivable sin — not sufficiently opposing Vietnam early enough — which I think is comparable to Romney’s association with health care.

    Obviously, it’s all going to have to play out. I’m just not convinced this will be a humdrum year in GOP circles.

  66. 66.

    Cris (without an H)

    June 8, 2011 at 11:19 am

    @jwb: W was an establishment candidate, however.

    It’s really easy to forget, in light of his actual presidency, how much of a moderate his campaign presented him as. Even though we had Molly Ivins and Jim Hightower to warn us at the time, the nation still heard the name “George Bush” and thought of his father.

  67. 67.

    Fred

    June 8, 2011 at 11:20 am

    @WyldPirate: Why are you not talking about the Quinpac poll today showing Obama ‘slaughtering’ (your words yesterday about the WaPo poll) everyone?

    No you don’t hate Obama. But you will call him an Usurper (Teabagger speak for “look at me, I’m a moron”) and breathlessly spittle over oulier polls.

    Any other lies you want to spew today WldPirate?

  68. 68.

    Ash Can

    June 8, 2011 at 11:24 am

    I’m thinking more and more that Romney will back into the nomination the way McCain did. Limbaugh will shill for him again, the batshit-insane faction (now arguably the majority in the GOP) will be splintered by all the other wackos in the primaries, and Mitt may even be able to get some of the mouthbreathers to vote for him with his shameless pandering. What I wonder about is how crazy he’ll (be forced to) go with his VP pick.

  69. 69.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 8, 2011 at 11:27 am

    @shortstop:

    Neither party can win the general with just the 40% lock vote it have going in.

    Someone’s got to get that other 11%.

    That means Mr. and Mrs. Low Information, “I make my mind up between Labor Day and Election Day, I vote the man, not the party.”

    And this is not an adventurous country. It’ll be some reassuring guy in a blue suit, not a bomb-tosser, who gets the GOP nod, unless they forgo winning right out of the chute.

    This is a nation of chain restaurants. Applebee’s. Romney. Chili’s. Pawlenty. We expect the expected.

    (Once in a while America does go a little nuts, and eats ethnic. P.F. Chang’s. Obama)

  70. 70.

    shortstop

    June 8, 2011 at 11:32 am

    @Davis X. Machina: Yep. That’s why I believe it will be Romney, and if not Romney, Pawlenty. I’ll be very, very surprised if it plays out otherwise.

    However, I do think the GOP primaries will be more entertaining than usual.

    P.F. Chang’s made me laugh. Too true.

  71. 71.

    shortstop

    June 8, 2011 at 11:35 am

    Also, too, it should be legal in all states to poke “I vote the man, not the party” people in the snoot. It’s bad enough that they have no idea how the political process works and things get/do not get done, but they always have to deliver that line with such misplaced smugness.

  72. 72.

    jwb

    June 8, 2011 at 11:41 am

    @Cris (without an H): I just meant that W was supported heavily by establishment money. This time around the establishment won’t be able to push someone who seems moderate (whatever the reality) because such a person won’t be able to run the gauntlet of the primary. They closed off that strategy when they made the decision to weaponize the stupid with the teatards. It’s the only reason Obama remains the favorite to win in 2012. If the Goopers were even close to sane or showed that they had a plan that didn’t rely on the existence of unicorns, Obama would be toast.

  73. 73.

    Fred

    June 8, 2011 at 11:48 am

    @WyldPirate: Yes yes we know you hate that Obama is better than you in every way. You don’t need to keep reminding us.

  74. 74.

    Villago Delenda Est

    June 8, 2011 at 11:54 am

    Ron Paul has been running web ads about “Romneycare” recently. Don’t know how much impact that will have, but Paul is trying to wreck Romney, and clearly sees him as the greatest obstacle to Paul’s fantasy of being the nominee.

  75. 75.

    shortstop

    June 8, 2011 at 12:01 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: I don’t think that will influence anyone other than people already disposed to like Paul.

  76. 76.

    Catsy

    June 8, 2011 at 12:07 pm

    Look, I’ll take a backseat to no one in my level of contempt for WyldPirate’s particular flavor of concern trolling and pathological knee-jerk Obama hatred, but he’s not wrong about the Republican primary. In the end, given a choice between a gay marrying communist Dhimmicrat negro and a Mormon, the religionists in the GOP will overwhelmingly choose the Mormon.

    Romney’s magic underoos will suppress their enthusiasm to one degree or another, and certainly some of the hardcore evangelicals will stay home, but the vast majority will hold their nose and vote for the guy who isn’t a black antichrist bent on annihilating their fantasy version of America.

    WyldPirate’s description of Obama as “usurper” et al was simply a description of how the nutjobs on the right view him.

    On a related note, in a cage match between WyldPirate and matoko-chan is it acceptable to root for injuries?

  77. 77.

    Mike in NC

    June 8, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    @Ash Can:

    What I wonder about is how crazy he’ll (be forced to) go with his VP pick.

    Choosing from Congress, it could be Paul Ryan or Mark Rubio. Possibly Rand Paul, despite his dad’s feelings about the flip-flopper Willard. Stranger matches have happened.

    Or it could be one of the teatard Midwestern governors.

  78. 78.

    cat48

    June 8, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    Paul is trying to wreck Romney,

    So is Freedom Works, Palin & some of Teaparty Express. It could get real ugly during the primaries.

  79. 79.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 8, 2011 at 12:28 pm

    @Catsy:

    In the end, given a choice between a gay marrying communist Dhimmicrat negro and a Mormon, the religionists in the GOP will overwhelmingly choose the Mormon.

    You mean they’ll vote for the lesser of two evils?

    Note to GOP: ur doing it rong.

  80. 80.

    alwhite

    June 8, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    I’ve said it before but it bears repeating – Pawlenty is an amoral, vacuous, empty suit. His administration would be peopled with the worst of the worst in order to curry favor with the wingnuts. He would have no compassion & no compunction about fucking over the poor, the disenfranchised and the weak. And he would do it with that bland, simpleton smile pasted firmly in place ‘cuz hes just a nice guy.

    The banality of evil.

    Mitt at least appears to have a soul & was once capable of actual compassion and governance. Hell, even Batshit Bachmann would be better for the country simply because her personality makes the crazy so obvious.

    Maybe it is just the Eyeore in me but, if things are as bad next fall as the White House is predicting, you may want to be very careful what you wish for in the way of Republican nominee. They might be our next President. (Big Daddy Bush was seen as unbeatable around this time in his first term).

  81. 81.

    Villago Delenda Est

    June 8, 2011 at 1:09 pm

    @Catsy:

    WyldPirate’s description of Obama as “usurper” et al was simply a description of how the nutjobs on the right view him.

    The visceral hatred of Clinton was based on this notion as well…somehow, the White House became the exclusive property of the GOP during the 80’s. Any Democrat, regardless of policy positions, skin color, sexual behavior, or financial status is an “usurper” in their view.

    It’s funny how the Democrats, after owning the White House for 20 years under FDR and Truman didn’t think that Eisenhower was an “usurper” for occupying that sacred ground. But then again, Eisenhower had absolutely no intention of rolling back Social Security. Which is why he’d be derided mercilessly as a RINO in today’s crazed fascist GOP.

  82. 82.

    Elie

    June 8, 2011 at 1:10 pm

    @Dream On:

    I agree. He and Hunstsman are Mormons. Not going to happen. As bad as the evangelicals are, the Mormons make that look like play time. Cult is only a mild term that I would use to describe this group. A violent and nefarious cult at that. No way.

  83. 83.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 8, 2011 at 1:21 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: It’s atavistic habits of mind, bastard versions of 17th c. absolutism and divine-right monarchy. Your basic Republican is a monarchist. And the strangest word-journey in politics isn’t what’s happened to the word ‘liberal’ over the last century and a half — it’s what happened to the word ‘republican’. They don’t actually espouse or want a republic.

    If you want to understand Republicans, you want to study your Bossuet, not your Madison and Hamilton and Jay…

    “God establishes kings as his ministers, and reigns through them over the people.” The presumption is if his ministers are not Godly, they’re presumptively not the Lord’s anointed, and so usurpers.

    (Actual absolutists and divine-right theorists ran this backwards — you had to obey the (drinkin’, whorin’) sovereign even if he’s manifestly not Godly, because of Who put him on the throne, and Whose judgement you don’t get to challenge. This only kicks in when there’s a Republican president.)

  84. 84.

    Villago Delenda Est

    June 8, 2011 at 1:26 pm

    @Davis X. Machina:

    Sideshow Bob had it right. Many Americans want to be ruled, not to help govern.

  85. 85.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 8, 2011 at 1:28 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: I think the hankering after kings will turn out some day to be shown to be genetic.

    Self-government is after all a species of work, and work is our punishment for eating of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

  86. 86.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    @Catsy: wyldpirate would be punching too far out of his intellectual weight class to make me bleed, sowwy.
    i must admit a certain dark and bittersweet pleasure in shredding the flabby american idealism and puffy western culture chauvinism of the juicer commentariat.
    it partly assuages the privileged class guilt of my upbringing.

  87. 87.

    Villago Delenda Est

    June 8, 2011 at 1:36 pm

    @Davis X. Machina:

    Self-government is after all a species of work, and work is our punishment for eating of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

    It all comes back to that fucked up monotheism, just about every single fucking time.

  88. 88.

    shortstop

    June 8, 2011 at 1:39 pm

    @Davis X. Machina: You may be right.

  89. 89.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 1:41 pm

    @jwb:

    I agree that if Palin was to win the nomination, Perry would be a natural VP choice.

    they have already sworn a mutual admiration pact.

    Bachman fails if Palin is on the ticket. She doesnt have the Palin name recognition or the fundage (SarahPac) in place…no star power.

  90. 90.

    Cris (without an H)

    June 8, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: Paul is trying to wreck Romney, and clearly sees him as the greatest obstacle to Paul’s fantasy of being the nominee.

    Paul’s real fantasy is that the Republican party can be purged of big-government RINOs — which in his mind, is pretty much everybody.

  91. 91.

    Cris (without an H)

    June 8, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    @jwb: sorry, I was trying to agree with you there

  92. 92.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 1:45 pm

    @shortstop: he is right.

    ‘Conservatives tend to be higher in a personality trait called orderliness and lower in openness. This means that they’re more concerned about a sense of order and tradition, expressing a deep psychological motive to preserve the current social structure,’ said Jacob Hirsh, a post-doctoral psychology student at U of T and lead author of the study.
    __
    The study, which appears in this month’s Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, may even lend some legitimacy to the term ‘bleeding-heart liberal.’
    __
    ‘Our data shows that liberalism is more often associated with the underlying motives for compassion, empathy and equality,’ said Hirsh.

  93. 93.

    Cris (without an H)

    June 8, 2011 at 1:47 pm

    @Davis X. Machina: you had to obey the (drinkin’, whorin’) sovereign

    You’ve been watching Game of Thrones, haven’t you?

  94. 94.

    Villago Delenda Est

    June 8, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    @Ghanima Atreides:

    they have already sworn a mutual admiration pact.

    Yeah, but when push comes to shove in Tampa, that “mutual admiration pact” becomes nothing more than a scrap of paper.

    All the sudden, it’s June 22nd, and the panzers are rolling across the frontier, and the skies are full of Stukas.

  95. 95.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 8, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    @Cris (without an H): Nope. Restoration.

  96. 96.

    jwb

    June 8, 2011 at 1:57 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: FDR was already a usurper and a class traitor.

  97. 97.

    jwb

    June 8, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    @Ghanima Atreides: I don’t think Bachmann would be anyone’s VP choice. But I say odds favor Bachmann over Palin simply because Palin will wait too long to enter allowing Bachmann to establish a large beachhead. Palin might still take it if the money pivots to her once it becomes clear that Romney can’t beat Bachmann on his own. The big, desperate moves won’t happen until after Romney gets trounced in South Carolina.

  98. 98.

    shortstop

    June 8, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    @Davis X. Machina: Oh, my, the horror. I’m pretty sure I wasn’t supposed to laugh out loud during Meg Ryan’s selfless caesarean suicide scene, but that script was a crime against humanity.

  99. 99.

    Nomad

    June 8, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    @Ash Can:

    What I wonder about is how crazy he’ll (be forced to) go with his VP pick.

    [insert nominee name] will be forced to go Token: Batshit or Cain

  100. 100.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 8, 2011 at 2:42 pm

    @shortstop: Is there anything a Meg Ryan caesarean suicide scene doesn’t improve?

    One of my favorite “The hell with the actors! Screw the script! Just look at all the money up there on the screen!” movies.

  101. 101.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    @jwb: hmmm….you might be right….but when does Palin have to declare to be on the ballot for the Iowa primary?

  102. 102.

    Anne Laurie

    June 8, 2011 at 4:10 pm

    @alwhite:

    Mitt at least appears to have a soul & was once capable of actual compassion and governance. Hell, even Batshit Bachmann would be better for the country simply because her personality makes the crazy so obvious.

    For the record: Not when you look him in the eyes, and no he wasn’t. Willard is a sociopath — a politician who not only tortured the family dog in front of his kids, he thought it was “funny” to brag about doing so to the voters afterwards. Our own Peoples’ Republic (Commonwealth, actually) occasionally forced him to act as if he cared about the rest of us meatpuppets, and he had the GHWB uppah-claaaaausse instincts to appoint people smarter than himself to do some of the grunt work of governing. Two tiring years of being forced to pretend that he should have to ‘campaign’ for the votes of us Lessers, and not just stroll to an unchallenged kingship, are not going to improve Romney’s temperament, but if he gets progressively meaner & less respectful as the GOPernaut juggers along, that’s only going to make the hardcore Spite Party voters love him more.

    I’m still 96% sure Romney’s going to be the 2012 Republican candidate. My only surcease is that it’s looking like he’s going to get stuck with either the Hermanator(tm) or Bachmann Turner Diaries Overdrive as his “partner”, and watching Willard be forced to share a podium with either of those two is arse-deep in comic potential.

  103. 103.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 8, 2011 at 8:20 pm

    @Anne Laurie:

    if he gets progressively meaner & less respectful as the GOPernaut juggers along, that’s only going to make the hardcore Spite Party voters love him more.

    he is still going to be a mormon. the only thing that will make the teabaggers sign on to Romney is if the polls show he can beat Obama.
    I dont see that happening.
    and plenty of independents wont vote for a mormon either.
    i think a scientologist will be elected before America ever elects a mormon president.

  104. 104.

    sdhays

    June 8, 2011 at 10:08 pm

    @Ghanima Atreides:

    i think a scientologist will be elected before America ever elects a mormon president.

    That’s over the top. I’ve known several Mormons and they’re all fine, normal people and completely capable of leaving the church if that’s where life leads them. The people saying they’re a “cult” etc. are being bigoted. I have no doubt that there are some cult-like Mormon (descendant) churches in Utah and the West, just as the Westboro Baptist Church is “Baptist”. Mainstream Mormons believe things that I think are crazy, but so do Baptists. Neither is a cult or deserve to be compared to Scientology.

    I’m skeptical that Romney’s Mormonism will sink him for the nomination. I’m sure it will cause some gnashing of teeth, but the thing is, issues really don’t matter that much to the Republican base voter (as opposed to the Republican money base, which cares only about #1 – making themselves richer); it’s all about the tribe. If it becomes clear that Romney is going to be the nominee, he will be accepted into the tribe and the Mormon “problem” will just not be talked about. If Fox News refuses to mention that Romney’s a Mormon or heavily downplays it, Republicans who say that they wouldn’t vote for Mormon will just pretend not to know about Romney’s faith.

    Now, are there enough people who actually would make the candidate’s religion the #1 criteria in voting to prevent Mitt from winning the nomination? I don’t know. It will certainly hurt him in the South, but it might not cost him California, New York, Illinois, etc, and that’s what you really need to get the nomination.

    I don’t see anyone who can plausibly take Romney right now. Bachman might be able to do it; she’s crazy like Palin, but she’s nowhere near as lazy as Palin is. She’s going to be the serious Palin; I think she truly believes that God told her to run and she’s not going to embarrass Him (at least using her definition of “embarrass”). Pawlenty did nothing to earn either national moderates’ or national tea partier’s respect while he was Governor of Minnesota; when you ask the question “What makes Tim Pawlenty think he can be President?”, you really can’t answer that question, other than the less than satisfying “because he was dropped on his head as a child”.

    Mitt’s vulnerabilities stretch on for miles, but I’m skeptical that his vulnerabilities are going to be his downfall, at least for the nomination. Another candidate has to step up. Otherwise, the Republican children will just do as Daddy Moneybags says and will vote for Romney, just as they did for the hated John McCain.

  105. 105.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 9, 2011 at 12:27 am

    @sdhays: /yawn

    This isn’t about what i think of mormons….its about what the conservative base (particularily the core WEC constituency) think about mormons.
    Membah this?

    “It will alienate the entire evangelical community – 62 million self-professing evangelicals in this country, half of them registered to vote, are going to be deeply saddened,” Mr. McCoy added.

    In 2008 the republican vote was 59,934,814. Subtract 31,000,000 and Romney doesnt have a snoballs chance in hell.
    The democratic vote was 69,456,897.
    Do the maffs. ;)
    The GOP needs to GAIN 10,000,000 to beat Obama, and any LOSS of votes is going to guarantee Obama’s second term.
    Now, not all 31,000,000 WECs will stay home on election day because Romney is a mormon….but any that do put the GOP farther into an electoral hole.

  106. 106.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 9, 2011 at 12:35 am

    @sdhays: and that is why…i think Palin is just dancing at point. why should she sign on to the work of running for president…when she can perhaps scare the GOP elites into offering her co-billing with Romney.
    I think Palin is stealth running for the VP slot.
    Shes got Rove by the short hairs this time around.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Feathers on Monday Evening Open Thread: Another ‘Rich’ Narcissist, Having A Bad Start to His Week (Apr 16, 2024 @ 12:22am)
  • Pennsylvanian on Hey Lurkers! (Apr 16, 2024 @ 12:12am)
  • Mr. Bemused Senior on Monday Evening Open Thread: Another ‘Rich’ Narcissist, Having A Bad Start to His Week (Apr 16, 2024 @ 12:01am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 782: If the Opposite of Pro Is Con, Then the Opposite of Progress is a GOP Majority in Congress (Apr 16, 2024 @ 12:00am)
  • Quinerly on Monday Evening Open Thread: Another ‘Rich’ Narcissist, Having A Bad Start to His Week (Apr 15, 2024 @ 11:59pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!