• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

šŸŽ¶ Those boots were made for mockin’ šŸŽµ

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

John Fetterman: Too Manly for Pennsylvania. Ā Paid for by the Oz for Senator campaign.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

The revolution will be supervised.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

Let there be snark.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

This fight is for everything.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

An almost top 10,000 blog!

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Civil Rights / LGBTQ Rights / Gay Rights are Human Rights / Most Anti-Gay President Ever

Most Anti-Gay President Ever

by John Cole|  June 10, 20111:29 pm| 164 Comments

This post is in: Gay Rights are Human Rights, Assholes, Manic Progressive

FacebookTweetEmail

President Obama continues his assault on John Aravosis and the gay community:

The Obama administration is set on Friday to issue policy guidance to states expanding their ability to offer same-sex couples the same protections afforded to straight couples when they receive long-term care under Medicaid, the Washington Blade has learned exclusively.

Under the new guidance, dated June 10, states have the option to allow healthy partners in a same-sex relationship to keep their homes while their partners are receiving support for long-term care under Medicaid, such as care in a nursing home.

The fact that President Obama’s administration is doing this in the month they proclaimed LGBT Pride Month is simply further proof that they hate gay people. Gays everywhere should heed Americablog’s call, and refuse to donate to Democrats so someone like this can win.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « She’s Fickle Like That
Next Post: We Are Ohio, sure, but we’re not always happy about that »

Reader Interactions

164Comments

  1. 1.

    AxelFoley

    June 10, 2011 at 1:31 pm

    Anything from Clarknt67 over at GOS?

    [crickets]

    No?

    Greenwald?

    [more crickets]

    Not a thing?

    I’m shocked–SHOCKED–I tell you.

  2. 2.

    Yutsano

    June 10, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    Yesbut…

    HE REFUSED TO END DADT ON DAY ONE WITH AN EXECUTIVE ORDER!! HE USED VICIOUS AND LIBELOUS ARGUMENTS TO DEFEND DOMA!! TRAITOR!! SELLOUT!! UPPITY NI*(clang)!!

    Gay men are some of the biggest racists on the planet. Bar none. A white gay man can declare openly he’ll only date other white men and few if any bat an eyelash. It gets pretty ugly and sickening.

  3. 3.

    Tom Hilton

    June 10, 2011 at 1:35 pm

    And you Obots probably think this makes up for Obama passing DOMA and instituting DADT. Typical.

  4. 4.

    Villago Delenda Est

    June 10, 2011 at 1:37 pm

    Well, this is minor administrivia that no one but the utter asshats from AFA pay any attention to, so you have that.

  5. 5.

    The Ancient Randonneur

    June 10, 2011 at 1:38 pm

    I’m sure it won’t be good enough because it only ALLOWS states to do this, it doesn’t mandate it. All the folks in “Real America” still won’t be covered.

  6. 6.

    beltane

    June 10, 2011 at 1:39 pm

    Wow, Americablog. I haven’t visited that site since 2008, when it started to devolve into insanity. Speaking of which, has anyone heard from David Sirota lately?

  7. 7.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 1:39 pm

    Damn progressives trying to use what little leverage they have. Didn’t they hear they’re supposed to make like the Human Rights Campaign — just hop on board the O-train and and hand over the passcode to the GAY-T-M.

  8. 8.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    @AxelFoley:

    Clark’s very fair when it comes to giving the Obama administration credit for its good moves.

    As for Greenwald, he only write about gay rights occasionally — not his issue.

    In short: stop bitching about bloggers not being sufficiently fawning of Pres.

  9. 9.

    Martin

    June 10, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    Yeah, well, Obama sat next to Kobe at a basketball game once, so clearly he’s a homophobe. This policy guidance is just words, man!

  10. 10.

    taylormattd

    June 10, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    I knew you would summon people like mizner with this post.

    @david mizner: So anyway, this is totally bad news for the gay community, amirte?

    Or it’s too little.

    Or it’s too late.

    Or it’s meaningless because he hasn’t announced his support for gay marriage yet.

    Or Donnie Mcclurkin.

  11. 11.

    Yutsano

    June 10, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    @david mizner: Idiot. What leverage do you get by standing out in the street screaming by yourself? The HRC has done a shit ton of good work over the years supporting many different LBGT causes. If they recognize that supporting Obama furthers their case, so fucking what? Should they just remain as pure as you and get nothing done but still feel proud of their purity? Get off my cause, you ain’t helping.

  12. 12.

    taylormattd

    June 10, 2011 at 1:45 pm

    @david mizner: Why should left wing blogs decline to comment about left wing bloggers like you, Aravosis, Jane, Greenwald, etc, most of whom have been on a 24/7 jihad against Obama since 2007?

  13. 13.

    Comrade Colette Collaboratrice

    June 10, 2011 at 1:46 pm

    @Yutsano:

    Gay men People are some of the biggest racists on the planet.

    Fixt.

    Seriously, I get your point, but sexuality, racial attitudes, and sexual attraction are so complex and mixed up. Would it be more accurate just to say that lots of gay men are more willing to express such ideas openly than straight men (or women), even if roughly the same proportions of gays and straights are willing to only date whites?

  14. 14.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 1:47 pm

    @taylormattd:

    Of course this is a good move. And overall Obama’s been decent on gay rights, especially compared to, say, the economy or war and peace.

    But I’m not about to blast or mock people, especially gay people, for trying to use their leverage to get better LGTB policy, whether it’s by withholding donations or heckling Pres at fundraisers.

  15. 15.

    ruemara

    June 10, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    Since Obama refuses to be gay while at the bully pulpit pledging to socialism, tofu and puppies, I think I’ll vote for Ron PaulNaderKucinich instead.

  16. 16.

    Huckster

    June 10, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    This is so what a moderate Republican would do

  17. 17.

    Yutsano

    June 10, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    @Comrade Colette Collaboratrice: Better way of saying it, but the fact that a gay man can just spout off a racist attitude like that with little to no consequence is really troubling. It’s like we iz not learning.

  18. 18.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    @Yutsano:

    Am I racist, though, like those evil gays?

  19. 19.

    Malinowski

    June 10, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    Are there still people who even read emo-prog blogs? I thought Greenwald, Sirota, Daou and Aravosis had all joined the foreign legion as much as anyone cares what they say anymore.

  20. 20.

    aisce

    June 10, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    @AxelFoley:

    Anything from Clarknt67 over at GOS?

    lol. honestly, you’re sicker than the professional left. fuck the haters like aravosis with a rusty pitchfork (though I bet his masochistic ass would probably like it), but silly internet dorks slay me. you sure did nail clarknt67! congratulations! and he has a number in his name, so you just know he’s a big shot player in this mad, mad world of ours.

  21. 21.

    Admiral_Komack

    June 10, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    @david mizner:

    AxelFoley:

    David Mizner haz a sad.

    Keep up the good work.

  22. 22.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    @taylormattd:

    Do you really think Clark is unfair to the Pres on these issues?

  23. 23.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    @david mizner:

    Damn progressives trying to use what little leverage they have.

    Yes, I’m sure the only reason the Obama administration made this move is because progressives like John Aravosis called them bigots and homophobes.

    It’s weird how you guys simultaneously claim to have ultimate power and no power whatsoever. It’s yet another thing you have in common with the teabaggers.

  24. 24.

    ruemara

    June 10, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    Take me out of moderation! Why do you censor criticism of Obama, you fawning Obot!

  25. 25.

    J.R.

    June 10, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    I’m sorry but I’m not going to bend down and kiss the president’s feet because his Health Department issued a “policy guidance” giving states the “option” of allowing sick gay people’s partners of keeping their home if they go into a nursing home.

    This President, on his own terms, has achieved great progress for LGBT Americans. But we can’t lower the bar so much that a sternly worded letter must be praised as the Gay Civil Rights Act of 2011.

    Repealing DOMA will make all these piecemeal half-solutions moot. Anything short of full equality is a compromise.

  26. 26.

    Tim, Interrupted

    June 10, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    @Yutsano:

    Gay men are some of the biggest racists on the planet. Bar none. A white gay man can declare openly he’ll only date other white men and few if any bat an eyelash. It gets pretty ugly and sickening.

    Wow. Where does this come from? Seriously, I’m kind of appalled at what you write here. BUT, maybe I’m wrong…can you provide some links to studies or polls backing your, uh…gross and seemingly homophobic/racist generalization?

    Thanks.

  27. 27.

    NR

    June 10, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    It’s weird how you guys simultaneously claim to have ultimate power and no power whatsoever

    Actually, no, it’s you guys who claim that about the “professional left.”

  28. 28.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    June 10, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    What took him so long? He’s only doing this so close to the election to try to fool the base– AGAIN!–and you O-bot sheeple are going to fall for it again, aren’t you? Pathetic. President Howard Rodham Kucinich-Bartlett would’ve passed gay marriage by executive fiat, and hit James Inhofe with a chair at the first SOTU. But that reality is too much for you people to admit to.

    You sheeple keep pretending your “The One” gives shit about anybody but banksters. Pathetic.

  29. 29.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    @david mizner:

    Psst. In case you missed it, Yutsano’s gay. You may not want to play the homophobe card here lest you look like even more of a whiner.

  30. 30.

    jnfr

    June 10, 2011 at 1:54 pm

    @beltane:

    Sirota has a morning radio show on Denver’s progressive AM station. I don’t hear him usually, since I do NPR that time of day. But he’s around :)

  31. 31.

    Comrade Colette Collaboratrice

    June 10, 2011 at 1:54 pm

    @Yutsano: I feel you. Seems like it hurts more when members of our own identity group are bad-example shitheels than when random others are. I feel the same way when I see other Jews saying racist or homophobic things: Hey! We’re supposed to be better than Those People!

  32. 32.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    Thank you for saying this, John. We can’t let these eleven gay racists swing the election for the only Republican candidate of color.

  33. 33.

    Tim, Interrupted

    June 10, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    @aisce:

    fuck the haters like aravosis with a rusty pitchfork (though I bet his masochistic ass would probably like it),

    homophobe/hater alert on aisle 7! Clean up please.

  34. 34.

    JonF

    June 10, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    I guess Aravosis is still hoping for a GOP ticket of Lindsey Graham/David Dreier ’12..aka “A dick sticking out of every closet?”

  35. 35.

    Blue Neponset

    June 10, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    @Mnemosyne: Don’t forget that lovely Teabagger tactic of demanding orthodoxy and shunning dissenters. That is something you and a lot of other seem to have in common with the Teabaggers.

    I for one am glad John Aravosis & Co. are speaking their minds. The day the Democratic Party isn’t big enough to include Aravosis and his ilk is the day I register as an independent.

  36. 36.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    ? I didn’t call him a homophobe, although being gay would hardly make him immune to that affliction.

    I merely called him out for saying something stupid.

  37. 37.

    Chris

    June 10, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    @Tim, Interrupted:

    Uh… WTF?

    You might as well say “black people are some of the biggest homophobes on the planet.”

  38. 38.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    @NR:

    Yes, progressives have no power or influence whatsoever, which is why Glenn Greenwald and Jane Hamsher are constantly on MSNBC.

    There are a lot of congresspeople who would love to be “ignored” by the media the same way that Greenwald and Hamsher are.

  39. 39.

    taylormattd

    June 10, 2011 at 1:57 pm

    @david mizner: You should try reading my comments which don’t say a single word about Clark. I recommend many, maybe even most of his diaries. If you want to know why someone else is bitching about Clark, perhaps you should ask the person who was doing so, as opposed to me.

  40. 40.

    ruemara

    June 10, 2011 at 1:57 pm

    @Comrade Colette Collaboratrice:

    last person to call me a n**ger. Beloved gay woman who was nursing a crush and p.o. I wasn’t going to ditch my bf for her. It’s just a bit surprising, but I’ve learned my lesson from other incidents within the community like that. We are all blind to our own prejudices, so don’t get all high and mighty about your minority status. I forgave her, but she never forgave herself, so we don’t speak anymore. I think she hurt herself more than she hurt me.

  41. 41.

    Yutsano

    June 10, 2011 at 1:58 pm

    @Comrade Colette Collaboratrice: Try being gay AND Jewish (or half in my case), no matter where you are you end up being the token something somewhere. It does make for interesting conversations though, especially when no one realizes it.

    @Mnemosyne: Oh I dunno, this is more fun like this. :) Plus I’m off to be ebil gubmint worker now so I’m running out of time anyway.

  42. 42.

    taylormattd

    June 10, 2011 at 1:58 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: lawl.

  43. 43.

    shortstop

    June 10, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    President Howard Rodham Kucinich-Bartlett would’ve passed gay marriage by executive fiat, and hit James Inhofe with a chair at the first SOTU. But that reality is too much for you people to admit to.

    This is the funniest thing so far in a very (often unintentionally) funny thread.

  44. 44.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    @taylormattd:

    Ah, okay, so you were pretending to disagree with me. Wouldn’t be the first time.

  45. 45.

    Mattminus

    June 10, 2011 at 2:00 pm

    @Yutsano:

    This is a pretty fucking dumb thing to say. For one, you’re making some pretty broad race based generalizations yourself.

    Second, I’m not so sure that who you’re attracted to can be racist. I’ve known all kinds of people with all kinds of preferences. Some that were only attracted to their own race, some that would never date their own race. I wouldn’t call any of them racist. The shlong wants what it wants.

  46. 46.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 2:01 pm

    I suppose the author of this comment is gay too.

    “fuck the haters like aravosis with a rusty pitchfork (though I bet his masochistic ass would probably like it)”

    Yikes.

  47. 47.

    Tonal Crow

    June 10, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    Oh boy, this bullshit again.

  48. 48.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 2:04 pm

    @taylormattd:

    Why should left wing blogs decline to comment about left wing bloggers like you, Aravosis, Jane, Greenwald, etc, most of whom have been on a 24/7 jihad against Obama since 2007?

    Awesome, we’ve gone from Aravosis to The Great Villians Of The Left Blogosphere. Can I get a Nader? Nader. Nader.

  49. 49.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 2:04 pm

    @david mizner:

    Yutsano is also not white, as you may have picked up from his name. But you’re right, I’m sure he doesn’t know anything about racism in the gay community.

  50. 50.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 2:05 pm

    @Tonal Crow:

    Oh boy, this bullshit again.

    Heh.

  51. 51.

    NR

    June 10, 2011 at 2:05 pm

    @Mnemosyne: Any time progressive critics of the administration get mentioned here, there’s always the same chorus: They’re irrelevant, unimportant, they have no power whatsoever.

    And yet somehow, they are deemed so dangerous that they must be attacked over and over again, to the level of obsession.

    The disconnect is simply amazing.

  52. 52.

    Chinn Romney

    June 10, 2011 at 2:05 pm

    @AxelFoley:

    Yes Axel, the fact that Greenwald hasn’t responded to some previously unknown, underground special interest Rag, about a policy that hasn’t even been formally released, the instant it’s released, proves beyond doubt that he’s in the advanced stages of Obama Derangement Syndrome.

    It’s so unlike Glen, knowing that he’s, you know, one of them, to turn his back on his peoples. Watching him doggedly pursue those bogus themes of an irresponsible media and the hypocrisy of all DC pols, including your beloved Boy, really fries me. He should be kissing the Big O’s ass and begging for forgiveness.

    You’re right, he’s too chicken. That’s one of the first things one notices about Greenwald, his lack of spine. Unlike our Fearless leader, who never backs down.

  53. 53.

    chopper

    June 10, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    @Yutsano:

    i’m a chinese hindu-speaking communist gay black woman. try that one on for size.

  54. 54.

    Valdivia

    June 10, 2011 at 2:07 pm

    @Yutsano:

    ha! being a female latina jew I know how you feel! :)

  55. 55.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    @Tim, Interrupted:

    Wow. Where does this come from? Seriously, I’m kind of appalled at what you write here. BUT, maybe I’m wrong…can you provide some links to studies or polls backing your, uh…gross and seemingly homophobic/racist generalization?

    Quit being a racist douchebag, you prissy little queen.

  56. 56.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    @NR:

    Any time progressive critics of the administration get mentioned here, there’s always the same chorus: They’re irrelevant, unimportant, they have no power whatsoever.

    You may want to read those choruses more closely. You seem to be confused about the difference between being a large voting block and being influential beyond the size of your actual voting block.

    Internet “progressives” like Aravosis are one of the above. Can you guess which one it is?

  57. 57.

    taylormattd

    June 10, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    @J.R.: sternlywordedletter hippiepuching thrownunderbus linuslucyfootball slapintheface tweedledeetweedledumb corporatecorporatecorporate bullypulpit justwordsnoaction issuesnotpersonalities killthebill publicopshun leeedership claplouder badnegotiator obamabot cult

  58. 58.

    Comrade Colette Collaboratrice

    June 10, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    @chopper:

    i’m a chinese hindu-speaking communist gay black woman. try that one on for size.
    ReplyR

    Yeah, but are you also Jewish and transgendered? ‘Cause if not, how can I take anything you say as an authentic expression of victimhood?

  59. 59.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 2:10 pm

    @Chinn Romney:

    It’s so unlike Glen, knowing that he’s, you know, one of them, to turn his back on his peoples. Watching him doggedly pursue those bogus themes of an irresponsible media and the hypocrisy of all DC pols, including your beloved Boy, really fries me.

    I sure am glad that Obama’s critics are never influenced by racism.

  60. 60.

    taylormattd

    June 10, 2011 at 2:10 pm

    @david mizner: Go Edwards!! EENR FOREVAR!

  61. 61.

    Ronbo

    June 10, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    I believe this should read, “Shaddup you fuckin faks, you should be happy with crumbs!”

    Equality as defined by our Constitution does not allow for second-class citizens. Even black people can get married. (how progressive!) Obama, and many of the commenters on this site, are pure bigots. Do you really think GLBT Americans are only 1/4 citizen worthy of limited rights? That bigotry.

  62. 62.

    Suffern ACE

    June 10, 2011 at 2:13 pm

    I’m happy just to keep this in perspective. I’d be insulted if the president decided to hold a parade and what is a minor policy announcement. Glad to move a step or two forward when things like the Governor in Wisconsin signing away hospital visitation rights that were so recently earned is still on my mind.

    Fuck the rest who just want to ruin my buzz, which would just wear off on its own.

    +0.25

  63. 63.

    pamelabrown

    June 10, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    @AxelFoley:

    Thank you [email protected]david mizner:

    david, I don’t think Clark is fair and his posters are worse. The main ones are the very same who have behaved atrociously in black kos diaries which, to me, denotes bigotry and racism. I, a gay activist, feel uncomfortable in his diaries. It has nothing to do with “botism” but more to do with how to best effect positive change via outreach. More Gandhi than flame thrower.

    The sad thing is that basically we hold the same views but disagree on the methods.

    P.S. Straight people should know that there is a segment of the gay community that is not only bigoted re: people of color but also against the transgendered. While anecdotal, my experience weighs heavily on gay, white, economically secure men.

    P.S. Dan Choi, the “hero”. I totally expect him to eventually admit he’s a log cabin republican. Bottom line: we need more builders than destroyers.

  64. 64.

    Corner Stone

    June 10, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    Yutsano is also not white, as you may have picked up from his name.

    I always thought this was a holdover from his childhood. Someone would call him a “Yutz!” and he’d respond “I know”.

  65. 65.

    eemom

    June 10, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    lmao here.

    On a sane blog, this would have been a nice quiet little thread about a rare bit of good news.

  66. 66.

    madmatt

    June 10, 2011 at 2:18 pm

    “OPTIONAL” which means hating gays is still allowed..the GUIDANCE is merely a way to suck up to the Gay Rights groups without actually DOING anything.

  67. 67.

    aisce

    June 10, 2011 at 2:19 pm

    @david mizner:

    i think captain martyr aravosis will weather it just fine. if he wants to escalate the rhetoric and wallow in the gutter, it can go both ways.

    fuck anybody who dares call our president a bigot or an enemy of human rights. fuck. them. they’re lower than dirt.

  68. 68.

    Chinn Romney

    June 10, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    Emphasis is entirely yours, my love. Don’t care one whit if you believe me, but race never entered into it as I was typing that. For those who are truly offended – as opposed to the phonies – I apologize.

  69. 69.

    Dr. Squid

    June 10, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    @Blue Neponset: Wasn’t aware that Aravosis’ tendency to banninate anyone who questions him was a sign of being a Great Progressive while criticizing him for said banninations is so much Teabaggerism.

  70. 70.

    Malinowski

    June 10, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    @david mizner:

    Edwards was lying sociopath. Please quit taking your permanent cognitive dissonance out on the rest of us.

    Also: get some style. Your online picture are outright creepy.

  71. 71.

    boss bitch

    June 10, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    We’re on the same side people. FFS!

  72. 72.

    Dr. Squid

    June 10, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    @taylormattd: Yeah, well I guess we all look the same.

  73. 73.

    Malinowski

    June 10, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    @david mizner:

    Edwards was lying sociopath. Please quit taking your permanent cognitive dissonance out on the rest of us.

    Also: get some style, brush your damn hair and teeth. Your online pictures are outright creepy.

  74. 74.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    @aisce:

    Weather what just fine? The rusty pitchfork that you want to stick in his ass?

  75. 75.

    Corner Stone

    June 10, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead: Damn. Never would’ve expected this kind of loathing from a fellow gay man not named taylormattd.

  76. 76.

    taylormattd

    June 10, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead: Why would I like Aravosis? He is a warmongering recent republican who, imo, is also anti-trans. Fuck him.

  77. 77.

    Sister Machine Gun of Quiet Harmony

    June 10, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    This is great news! Obama is a 1000% better than Bush (and ANY of the GOP candidates, past and present) and 100% better than Clinton on gay issues.

  78. 78.

    different church-lady

    June 10, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    @eemom:

    On a sane blog…

    Wait… there are sane blogs?

  79. 79.

    chopper

    June 10, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    well, mizner has a sad, so good on obama.

  80. 80.

    pamelabrown

    June 10, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    @david mizner:

    Please david, don’t race bait. You’re better than that. Race baiting is a form of dismissal, just like being labeled an “Obamabot”. Discussion is on total shut-down.

  81. 81.

    Corner Stone

    June 10, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    @pamelabrown:

    Discussion is on total shut-down.

    Tribal marking is rampant here. The difference is that being labeled an Obot is usually self-referential and praised by the in-group.
    It’s the other tags that get hung on people that shut down discussion and debate.

  82. 82.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    @pamelabrown:

    Race bait? What are you talking about?

  83. 83.

    N W Barcus

    June 10, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    I don’t get this hysterical and hyperbolic reaction on the part of Cole. What is it about queer rights issues that compels him to improvise a straw man out of a few wisps of straw?

    JC, you can lash out at those of us who criticize Obama for backing off of his campaign pledges of being a “forceful advocate” of equal rights for queers, but you can’t speak for us. In what form of democracy does having your voice require that our voices shouldn’t be heard and our votes shouldn’t count? You’re probably just another of those privileged “moderates” that Martin Luther King spoke of in his last speeches, the ones who were a greater obstacle to social justice than reactionary racist thugs.

    FDR is famously said to have told visiting progressives that he agreed with their goals, but that they would have to keep up the pressure so he was compelled to implement them as well. Obama’s said the same thing. Dissatisfaction and dissent are a necessary part of democracy and change, and it’s not unlikely that the administration’s recent progressive moves on DOMA and DADT are the result of that very process.

  84. 84.

    david mizner

    June 10, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    @david mizner:

    To be clear, I was responding to this comment:

    “Gay men are some of the biggest racists on the planet.”

    Which suggests that Aravosis’s criticism of Obama grows out of his racism. Yes, someone was race-baiting but it wasn’t me.

  85. 85.

    shortstop

    June 10, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    Is it wrong to still be laughing at the image of President Howard Rodham Kucinich-Bartlett hitting Inhofe with a chair at the SOTU? Or, more precisely, at someone sputteringly insisting that he would have done so?

  86. 86.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    @Chinn Romney:

    Don’t care one whit if you believe me, but race never entered into it as I was typing that.

    Yes, I can completely believe that someone in 2011 wouldn’t realize that referring to an African-American man as a “boy” would possibly be offensive. If he had been in a coma for the past 50 years or so.

  87. 87.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    @N W Barcus:

    I can’t speak for Cole, but what bugs me is the insistence on the part of a lot of Obama’s critics that any failure to progress more quickly is due to Obama’s personal homophobia and hatred of gay people.

    You can be critical of the slowness of the progress without insisting that Obama is personally holding progress back because he hates gay people. And, yes, we have had multiple people here who claimed that, though the most recent one has thankfully been banned.

  88. 88.

    taylormattd

    June 10, 2011 at 2:47 pm

    Pamela, mizner wasn’t race baiting. He was responding to someone else’s comment, the I think the blockquote failed

  89. 89.

    Arturo

    June 10, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    Goodness indeed. Another non-starter to get the ignorant rubes to think the Obama Administration is doing something for the gays. Just like his economic programs have convinced the nitwits that we are in full economic recovery.

    Those of us who work for a living have not seen the recovery yet. But, I hear tell that the non-existent recovery is not as healthy as the Bankers and Media tell us at every opportunity. The Obots are merely Republican-lite. They don’t realize that the Reps and Dems are on the same team – the banker’s team. Their leader, The Fed, has them all well in tow.

  90. 90.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    I can’t speak for Cole, but what bugs me is the insistence on the part of a lot of Obama’s critics that any failure to progress more quickly is due to Obama’s personal homophobia and hatred of gay people.

    Thank for for taking such a forceful stand against something that isn’t actually happening here. I know it isn’t easy arguing with the voices in yer head while yer talking to various strangers on the internet.

  91. 91.

    Keith G

    June 10, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    @Yutsano:

    Gay men are some of the biggest racists on the planet. Bar none. A white gay man can declare openly he’ll only date other white men and few if any bat an eyelash.

    That type of grandly general statement may well reflect your experiences, but in the universal set of white gay male Americans there is (by my experience) more variation than your model suggests. There have been issues in the Gay community and bias in its many forms certainly is among them – and jeebus knows that some queers (said lovingly by an insider) have rather peculiar check lists for potential romantic partners. Are all of those checklists due to racist?

    I do not know.

  92. 92.

    pamelabrown

    June 10, 2011 at 2:55 pm

    @david mizner:

    Your comment, #18, I believe, “Am I racist, though, like the EVIL (my caps) gays” struck me wrong. I would never accuse you of racism, david, still I, a white gay, am just saying your comment was inflammatory.

  93. 93.

    Marc McKenzie

    June 10, 2011 at 2:56 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    “It’s weird how you guys simultaneously claim to have ultimate power and no power whatsoever. It’s yet another thing you have in common with the teabaggers.”

    Close, but remember–the Teabaggers went out there and voted. They didn’t stay home pouting, “Not getting my vote! I’m sending a message! Not a dime’s worth of difference!”

    Just sayin’….

  94. 94.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 2:56 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    Thank for for taking such a forceful stand against something that isn’t actually happening here.

    It’s not like referring to the president as a “boy” could possibly be construed as racist, amirite? It’s not like there’s any kind of history behind it or anything.

  95. 95.

    boss bitch

    June 10, 2011 at 2:58 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    You can be critical of the slowness of the progress without insisting that Obama is personally holding progress back because he hates gay people. And, yes, we have had multiple people here who claimed that, though the most recent one has thankfully been banned.

    And I’ve seen these same people say that personal behavior has nothing to do with a politicians policy.

  96. 96.

    Marc McKenzie

    June 10, 2011 at 2:58 pm

    @Ronbo:

    Ronbo…are you really this dumb? Is it genetic? Or did you have to really work at it?

    Jeezus….

  97. 97.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 2:58 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    It’s not like referring to the president as a ā€œboyā€ could possibly be construed as racist, amirite? It’s not like there’s any kind of history behind it or anything.

    He said it, you called him on it, he apologized. Should we ban him for a week to make sure he’s really sorry?

  98. 98.

    cat48

    June 10, 2011 at 2:59 pm

    The Christian News Network wrote that “This is the most ‘homosexualized’ Administration in History….” This was in response to the Proclamation. Can’t wait to see what they call it in response to this. heh

  99. 99.

    Corner Stone

    June 10, 2011 at 3:02 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    It’s weird how you guys simultaneously claim to have ultimate power and no power whatsoever. It’s yet another thing you have in common with the teabaggers.

    What’s actually weird about this is when diehard supporters tell us the most powerful man on the planet is powerless to effect change, and then when something gets passed by Congress it somehow automatically goes up on the president’s ledger for accounting purposes.
    “What do you expect him to dooOOoOooo?”
    “He got such and such passed didn’t he!?”

  100. 100.

    Marc McKenzie

    June 10, 2011 at 3:02 pm

    “This is great news! Obama is a 1000% better than Bush (and ANY of the GOP candidates, past and present) and 100% better than Clinton on gay issues.”

    Perhaps, but haven’t you heard? According to David Swanson, Hamsher, GG, and some who post on progressive blogs, he’s WORSE than Bush.

    Really–I’m not kidding.

    Of course, why anyone would think that….nah, I can’t go there. I just got back from SUPER 8 and I’m enjoying the positive buzz I got from seeing it. But reading some of these comments….well, it’s killing it. Better stop now.

  101. 101.

    kc

    June 10, 2011 at 3:04 pm

    Jesus, look at the carnage here. Strawcorpses everywhere . . .

  102. 102.

    Arturo

    June 10, 2011 at 3:05 pm

    @N W Barcus: We need to hear more from you. I like how you think. Too bad so very many Democrats have morphed into Republican-lite. Why do they think they can constantly move to the right AND still call themselves Democrats? Nixon would be considered a flaming liberal by a lot of the regulars on this so-called Democratic site.

  103. 103.

    Whiskey Screams from a Guy With No Short-Term Memory

    June 10, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    Gay men are some of the biggest racists on the planet. Bar none. A white gay man can declare openly he’ll only date other white men and few if any bat an eyelash. It gets pretty ugly and sickening.

    @Yutsano: I’m glad that someone finally “came out of the closet”, as it were, and addressed this. It’s true. I lived in the Castro for a while and everyone there hated blacks, poor people and women, in that order.

    And the number of them who were registered Republicans would floor most of you.

  104. 104.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    He said it, you called him on it, he apologized.

    So you acknowledge that it actually happened and was not “one of the voices in my head”?

    He apologized, so fair enough. It’s your pretending that his apology means that he never said it at all and I made the whole thing up out of whole cloth that’s the problem here.

  105. 105.

    Rorgg

    June 10, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    @Yutsano: What’s that have to do with gay? And is it actually considered racist?

    I have dated a black woman in the past, but in general, my guess is that even if I end up on the market again, I probably wouldn’t, just because that’s not how my personal tastes run.

    Sexual attraction’s just what it is. If it falls on a subset of the population … well, so be it, be it for men, redheads, or pale women.

  106. 106.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    @Mnemosyne: SAY. SHH. TO. THE. VOICES.

    I’m not pretending anything, you witless feck. I’m simply pointing out yer doing a standup job denouncing folks that aren’t actually here. Did I miss the part where C. Romney said Obama hates gay people?

  107. 107.

    BTD

    June 10, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    Cole is laughing at all of you.

  108. 108.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    @BTD:

    Cole is laughing at all of you.

    He’ll stop laughing when he falls down again.

  109. 109.

    Mnemosyne

    June 10, 2011 at 3:22 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    I’m not pretending anything, you witless feck. I’m simply pointing out yer doing a standup job denouncing folks that aren’t actually here. Did I miss the part where C. Romney said Obama hates gay people?

    Okay, I know this is complicated, but try to follow along:

    There is a strong feeling in the gay community that black people hate gay people. It is a feeling that, unfortunately, has some truth.

    Obama is black.

    People complaining in this thread about how Obama’s not moving quickly enough on gay rights just accidentally happen to use words that emphasize that he’s black. But I’m sure that’s all a total coincidence, right?

    And on that note, the voices in my head are saying it’s time for lunch and that there’s a huge project on our desk that has to get done when we return, so you’re going to have to get along without further contributions from us, I’m afraid.

  110. 110.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 3:26 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    People complaining in this thread about how Obama’s not moving quickly enough on gay rights just accidentally happen to use words that emphasize that he’s black. But I’m sure that’s all a total coincidence, right?

    So we’re assuming C. Romney is gay? I didn’t pick up on that but I’ve got lousy gaydar. I still can’t believe Neil Patrick Harris is gay.

  111. 111.

    Brachiator

    June 10, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    @david mizner:

    But I’m not about to blast or mock people, especially gay people, for trying to use their leverage to get better LGTB policy, whether it’s by withholding donations or heckling Pres at fundraisers.

    I will happily blast them. How is it getting better policy? Given the attempts by Republicans to roll back gay rights at the state and local level, this strategy of attacking the Obama administration is stupid, short-sighted and suicidal.

    @Yutsano:

    Gay men are some of the biggest racists on the planet. Bar none. A white gay man can declare openly he’ll only date other white men and few if any bat an eyelash.

    It gets pretty ugly and sickening. I take your point, but your example is weak in some ways. Who you choose to date is arbitrary and quixotic, not really much subject to review. But how those preferences are expressed in public can be noxious and can undermine an entire community.

    I can recall some gays, happy that West Hollywood was becoming more or less an official gay enclave with political representation, then turn around and hint (or worse) that West Hollywood should be a white gay community.

  112. 112.

    toujoursdan

    June 10, 2011 at 3:47 pm

    Oh for goodness sake, for every white gay guy I’ve met who is only into other white guys, I’ve met other white guys who only want to date black or Asian guys. There are even clubs for men who are have preferences toward men of another race, like Black and White Men Together. White guys exclusively into Asians are often called “rice queens” which may or may not be derogatory depending on the context.

    More than once I’ve approached someone I was attracted to only to find out I’m the wrong race, or too muscular, or too hairy, tall or whatever.

    Of course there are racists in the gay community. Being gay doesn’t make one exempt from stupidity. But I’m not convinced that race-based dating preferences are an expression of racism any more than any other physical preference represents a bigotry. I don’t go around accusing twenty-year-old men of ageism if they don’t want to date a man in his fifties. What humans find physically attractive is complex.

  113. 113.

    Brachiator

    June 10, 2011 at 3:56 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    Okay, I know this is complicated, but try to follow along: There is a strong feeling in the gay community that black people hate gay people. It is a feeling that, unfortunately, has some truth.

    The additional complication here is that some gays assume that gay means white gays, making gay society a distorted mirror of the larger society in which nonwhites can ride along as long as they shut up.

    The further complication is that some people define themselves as much by their ethnicity as by their sexuality, and then stew in the juices of their bigotry.

    There is far less truth to the idea the notion that blacks “hate” gays, but it is a lie that some people happily love to keep alive. And to try to use this to rationalize any anti-Obama crap is sheer, plain, unadulterated bigotry. Let’s see. Obama is black, so he must hate gays just because he is black. What, is homophobia genetic?

    And it continues to astound me that some weird political Alzheimer’s always drops on some people’s heads that makes them forget all the gay blacks involved in the Civil Rights movement. Similarly, people don’t know, or forget, or simply cannot comprehend that the Harlem Renaissance was an interracial sexual revolution that involved white, Latino and black gays, or that there were mini-sexual and interracial revolutions during World War II, especially among gay and bisexual women who entered the work force, mixing in ways that surprised a lot of people (including some of the women themselves).

    But just as American society always tried to enforce racial segregation and a rigid notion of sexuality, still to this day some people want to insist that there is a gay community over here and a black community over there which has never overlapped in any way, shape or form. It’s a big lie, but some people need to believe it.

    And please note, for the sake of the stupid people in the room, that I am in no way ascribing any of this view to you personally.

  114. 114.

    AxelFoley

    June 10, 2011 at 3:57 pm

    @david mizner:

    Clark’s very fair when it comes to giving the Obama administration credit for its good moves.
    As for Greenwald, he only write about gay rights occasionally—not his issue.
    In short: stop bitching about bloggers not being sufficiently fawning of Pres.

    Yeah, whatev, dave.

  115. 115.

    AxelFoley

    June 10, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    @J.R.:

    Anything short of full equality is a compromise.

    So you expect (not want, but expect) everything in one full swoop? You know this is the real world, right?

    I want full equality for everyone, too, but I know that real, permanent, progressive change unfortunately takes time in the real world.

  116. 116.

    Admiral_Komack

    June 10, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    @taylormattd:

    Or, until he gets outed by the National Enquirer.

  117. 117.

    AxelFoley

    June 10, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    Thank you for saying this, John. We can’t let these eleven gay racists swing the election for the only Republican candidate of color.

    Herman Cain’s for gay rights?

  118. 118.

    Tim, Interrupted

    June 10, 2011 at 4:10 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    Quit being a racist douchebag, you prissy little queen.

    I am not little!

  119. 119.

    OzoneR

    June 10, 2011 at 4:12 pm

    @david mizner</a

    >: Damn progressives trying to use what little leverage they have.

    Progressive need leverage against someone doing what they want?

  120. 120.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    @Tim, Interrupted: John, Tim’s saying things I don’t like. Can you ban him again?

  121. 121.

    OzoneR

    June 10, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    1.) Just Words
    2.) Just Pandering for Votes
    3.) Only Did This Because We Made A Stink
    4.) So what, this is what he should do
    5.) All of the Above

  122. 122.

    AxelFoley

    June 10, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    @Chinn Romney:

    Yes Axel, the fact that Greenwald hasn’t responded to some previously unknown, underground special interest Rag, about a policy that hasn’t even been formally released, the instant it’s released, proves beyond doubt that he’s in the advanced stages of Obama Derangement Syndrome.
    It’s so unlike Glen, knowing that he’s, you know, one of them, to turn his back on his peoples. Watching him doggedly pursue those bogus themes of an irresponsible media and the hypocrisy of all DC pols, including your beloved Boy, really fries me. He should be kissing the Big O’s ass and begging for forgiveness.
    You’re right, he’s too chicken. That’s one of the first things one notices about Greenwald, his lack of spine. Unlike our Fearless leader, who never backs down.

    LOL, why not? He usually responds as soon as his name is mentioned.

    Who says he should kiss Obama’s ass? Where did I say that? And if he is so fearless in your eyes, why isn’t he putting HIS ass on the line here in the U.S. instead of from his perch in Brazil? Why isn’t he fighting the good fight here?

    I see Obama putting his own neck on the line daily, while dealing with a crazy as fuck GOP/Teabagger party, a fucked up media, and members of his own party and the professional left kneecapping him every chance they get, while pussy-ass muhfuckers on the left complain about him not doing enough.

    So what is Greenwald doing?

    Yeah, thought so.

  123. 123.

    Tim, Interrupted

    June 10, 2011 at 4:15 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    John, Tim’s saying things I don’t like. Can you ban him again?

    OMG, JSF is ABL!

  124. 124.

    OzoneR

    June 10, 2011 at 4:16 pm

    @NR:

    Any time progressive critics of the administration get mentioned here, there’s always the same chorus: They’re irrelevant, unimportant, they have no power whatsoever. And yet somehow, they are deemed so dangerous that they must be attacked over and over again, to the level of obsession.

    Dangerous? LMFAO, you people aren’t dangerous; pathetic, annoying, dispiriting for no reason, but not dangerous.

  125. 125.

    Tim, Interrupted

    June 10, 2011 at 4:17 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    John, Tim’s saying things I don’t like. Can you ban him again?

    Also, too: It is clear you want me banned only because I am a proud, un-little, gay, white man of Germanic heritage; thus you are homo/aryan-phobic.

    I am writing Cole an email, so just you wait, Mr. Man!

  126. 126.

    OzoneR

    June 10, 2011 at 4:19 pm

    @J.R.:

    Repealing DOMA will make all these piecemeal half-solutions moot. Anything short of full equality is a compromise.

    Compromise…in a representative democracy? The horror

  127. 127.

    AxelFoley

    June 10, 2011 at 4:19 pm

    @eemom:

    On a sane blog, this would have been a nice quiet little thread about a rare bit of good news.

    LOL, my bad.

  128. 128.

    chopper

    June 10, 2011 at 4:24 pm

    @Comrade Colette Collaboratrice:

    i didn’t make it through the holocaust in order to be treated that way, kiddo. i’m also a member of the Blind Left-Handed Dentists Without Tonsils of America.

  129. 129.

    OzoneR

    June 10, 2011 at 4:32 pm

    @Ronbo: Equality as defined by our Constitution does not allow for second-class citizens.

    Which would explain why the administration has stopped defending DOMA.

    @beltane:

    Speaking of which, has anyone heard from David Sirota lately?

    who?

  130. 130.

    Ponies on Ice

    June 10, 2011 at 4:40 pm

    Fuck the angry gay left. They’re what, 5% of the population? They demand that EVERYTHING be about GAY GAY GAY people all the time.

    These are the same assholes who cried like the girls they are when they don’t get their magic gay pony personally delivered by Obama on a weekly basis.

    “Waaaaaah! I want my pony right now! My big gay pony is THE MOST IMPORTANT issue facing the country, because it’s all about ME and MY BIG GAY PONY! Waaaaaah! I just won’t vote for Obama next time, Waaaaaaaaah!”

    Just shut the fuck up already. No one cares outside your little gay circle about your goddamn pet cause.

  131. 131.

    Vlad

    June 10, 2011 at 4:55 pm

    @Yutsano:

    WTF? Choosing romantic partners based on appearance isn’t racism. Pretty much everybody has preferences as far as appearance are concerned – preferring a particular skin color isn’t discriminatory any more than preferring a particular hair color, or height, or style of dress, or level of muscle tone.

    No matter how sensitive and enlightened you may be, if you aren’t physically attracted to a person, then sex with that person is going to suck. You can’t talk yourself into a boner.

  132. 132.

    DZ

    June 10, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    This thread alone makes me fear for our party, if I can say that anymore, in 2012.

  133. 133.

    celticdragonchick

    June 10, 2011 at 4:59 pm

    @pamelabrown:

    P.S. Straight people should know that there is a segment of the gay community that is not only bigoted re: people of color but also against the transgendered. While anecdotal, my experience weighs heavily on gay, white, economically secure men.

    Unfortunately true.

  134. 134.

    drkrick

    June 10, 2011 at 4:59 pm

    @Arturo:

    Nixon would be considered a flaming liberal by a lot of the regulars on this so-called Democratic site.

    Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that adoption of the Nixon domestic program would be considered a surprisingly liberal outcome in this day and age. Which is a hell of a lot different than saying anyone thinks that’s a good thing.

  135. 135.

    celticdragonchick

    June 10, 2011 at 5:02 pm

    @Tim, Interrupted:

    Also, too: It is clear you want me banned only because I am a proud, un-little, gay, white man of Germanic heritage; thus you are homo/aryan-phobic.
    I am writing Cole an email, so just you wait, Mr. Man!

    My Scottish ancestors wanna go medieval on your Saxon/Germanic ancestors.

    :)

  136. 136.

    Tim, Interrupted

    June 10, 2011 at 5:21 pm

    @celticdragonchick:

    My Scottish ancestors wanna go medieval on your Saxon/Germanic ancestors.

    Somebody needs to every few decades, just to prevent another world war for god’s sake. Germans can be cranky. :P

    (I can say that; I’m full blooded German from both sides of the family! It’s kind of self-racist, but kind of also true!)

  137. 137.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    June 10, 2011 at 5:32 pm

    @taylormattd:

    You forgot thevealpen.

    :)

  138. 138.

    Allan

    June 10, 2011 at 5:47 pm

    @david mizner:

    But I’m not about to blast or mock people, especially gay people, for trying to use their leverage to get better LGTB policy, whether it’s by withholding donations or heckling Pres at fundraisers.

    Very well then, I shall mock them instead.

    Hardeeharhar what stupid self-centered assholes they are!

    Almost as stupid as self-righteous assholes who applaud their masturbatory strategeries like David “I Completely Bought the Bullshit John Edwards Peddled” Mizner.

  139. 139.

    Skipjack

    June 10, 2011 at 5:58 pm

    Sore-winning is pointless in a coalition as fractious as the Democrats. Cole, you are keeping people from ever admitting they could have been wrong. Some of them might take some kind of maximalist approach to policy and drama, but you will have folks suspecting you mean them too when you didn’t. If you are going to name and shame, give a chance to join the righteous.

    Really we’ll all need each other not far down the line. Take the latest out of Iraq, where there’s growing noise we’ll be invited to stay longer. Someone who isn’t allowed by their own party to make up for not giving the Administration the benefit of the doubt on an issue like gay rights might also not be in a hurry to give the benefit of the doubt on something like Iraq. All of us want to leave, but many of us will see that it might not quite be time yet. But people can only be convinced if they think you are someone worth hearing out.

    ETA: it’s time to forgive people for being taken in by Edwards. Rubbing peoples’ noses in turds doesn’t make them care about the carpet.

  140. 140.

    David in NYC

    June 10, 2011 at 6:03 pm

    @OzoneR:

    Compromise…in a representative democracy? The horror

    So, “separate but equal” would be just fine with you?

  141. 141.

    Fred

    June 10, 2011 at 6:31 pm

    Dan Choi tweeted today “more evidence Obama hates us gays”. The professional left then dutifully reported it and renewed their effort to primary Obama and get a real liberal in there like Jane Hamsher.

  142. 142.

    OzoneR

    June 10, 2011 at 6:31 pm

    @David in NYC:

    So, ā€œseparate but equalā€ would be just fine with you?

    That’s what courts are for. The courts are the branch of government that is supposed to fix the compromises the other branches must make.

    When given the choice of separate and unequal and separate but equal, you get the closest to equality you can get, and hope it’s momentum to get you there

    or that the courts will rule in your favor. If you believe in the Constitution, they will.

  143. 143.

    Lysana

    June 10, 2011 at 6:48 pm

    @celticdragonchick:

    Unfortunately true.

    Also bisexuals. I’ve pointed out Dan Savage’s hatred for trans and bi people here more than once. We don’t fit their standards, so we’re disposable unless we sacrifice our needs for their cause. Then when we want our turn, they walk away or worse, spit on us. Barney Frank’s done this, too. Aravosis has demonstrated active transmisogyny to my memory. I don’t know if he’s expressed active biphobia, but the two happen in the same minds so often that I’d be amazed if he wasn’t. It’s called intersectionality and the kyriarchy. And it’s not homophobic to point this out. Especially since most homophobia is really transmisogyny (you’re misusing or disrespecting the male genitalia, therefore, you are evil is the summary of both hatreds). It’s not transmisogyny to say that far too many rich white gay males and lesbians are bi and trans haters. As well as racists.

    As for what Obama did, it’s clearly an attempt to improve matters for same-sex couples until DOMA can be properly disposed of. If all he can do is the small things right now, I’d rather see him do them than leave them alone until the big one’s gone. It shows a strength of commitment no other President has to GLBT rights.

  144. 144.

    Lysana

    June 10, 2011 at 6:52 pm

    Prior comment edited to remove the offending male organ. *sighs* I should’ve remembered that!

  145. 145.

    PanurgeATL

    June 10, 2011 at 6:57 pm

    @Vlad:

    Ditto. I almost can’t define myself as gay because (to be perfectly blunt) the squares and traditionalists took over the scene a very long time ago, and I only like (and have) long hair. As in so much else, to be a clone is to be a conservative. Any gay scene worthy of the name is no place for male insecurity, IMNSHO.

  146. 146.

    OzoneR

    June 10, 2011 at 7:32 pm

    @Lysana:

    Also bisexuals. I’ve pointed out Dan Savage’s hatred for trans and bi people here more than once.

    In my younger days, I worked at a suicide prevention center and we had a lot of people who were bisexual and trans who felt they were abused by both sides. Especially the bisexuals, whom everyone thought were either gay and afraid to admit it (I’ll admit, I thought that at first) or straight with a nasty fetish.

  147. 147.

    OzoneR

    June 10, 2011 at 8:02 pm

    @N W Barcus:

    FDR is famously said to have told visiting progressives that he agreed with their goals, but that they would have to keep up the pressure so he was compelled to implement them as well. Obama’s said the same thing.

    I think progressives are trying to figure out why the pressure isn’t working (IMO, because they’re not really applying any pressure at all, rather threatening a murder/homicide).

    Progressives in the 1930s were successful because there were more of them actively promoting their ideas and their promotions were heard because there was no right wing media machine.

    LGBT issues have been more successful because, at least from my point of view, this is an issue people are actively pushing, while no one is going out there lining up for a trillion dollar jobs bill or an end to tax cuts.

  148. 148.

    OzoneR

    June 10, 2011 at 8:06 pm

    This is worth reading

    Of course voters want to think that their leaders have all the control. And studies show that voters tend to favor incumbent presidents when the economy is doing well. But the idea that the president controls the short-term dial on the unemployment rate, or economic growth for that matter, is entirely off. A study by former Council of Economic Advisers chair Christina Romer and David Romer, for instance, finds that changes in tax rates (a central theme in the jobs debate) account for less than one-tenth of the variation in GDP growth. Even monetary policy, considered a speedy lever for altering interest rates, isn’t a quick fix for jobs. A recent report by the St. Louis Fed finds that, even though monetary policy may affect interest rates short-term, it’s not clear that those translate into higher growth or employment rates in the short term.
    And yet, in response to the clamor for immediate action, the Obama administration is rolling out plans for jobs training programs that promise to put people back to work. But even here, studies show that the benefits of these types of programs — in terms of boosting jobs and wages — are often short-lived. They die once the funding wears off.
    The sad truth is that high unemployment will be sticking around, for long after 2012. The McKinsey Global Institute predicts that getting employment back to its pre-recession peak could take five years. And if you take the long view on U.S. joblessness, that isn’t Obama’s fault. Jobs recoveries have increasingly lagged economic recoveries in every recession since 1991, according to analysis of Fed data by economist Raghuram Rajan. That’s led to a rise in chronic unemployment levels over the years, which are even harder to fix.
    That makes Obama’s jobs problem more political than economic, because policies that lead to sustainable employment in the long-run — better education, regulation, social insurance — take more than one term to pull off. In that sense, judging Obama for the economic message he uses to stay in office is fair game. But blaming him for the country’s joblessness is not.

    Read more: http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2011/06/09/is-rising-unemployment-obamas-fault/#ixzz1OvAouvKH

    I think what will be wise is pushing Democrats in Congress into a message of “give us back our majority and we’ll do what we did in 2009-2010, only we’ll do it better”

    The only problem I see is we still have the “deficits are causing high unemployment” meme stuck in people’s brains.

  149. 149.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 8:38 pm

    @OzoneR:

    I think what will be wise is pushing Democrats in Congress into a message of ā€œgive us back our majority and we’ll do what we did in 2009-2010, only we’ll do it betterā€

    You are a fucking idiot.

  150. 150.

    Tim, Interrupted

    June 10, 2011 at 9:05 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    You are a fucking idiot.

    LOL. True, that.

  151. 151.

    OzoneR

    June 10, 2011 at 9:58 pm

    @Just Some Fuckhead: That’s all you got. lol weak.

  152. 152.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 10, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    @OzoneR:

    In my younger days, I worked at a suicide prevention center

    Nick worked at a suicide prevention center also. It’s positively eerie how much you douchebags have in common.

  153. 153.

    AxelFoley

    June 10, 2011 at 10:55 pm

    Can’t you feel the love in this thread?

  154. 154.

    Christopher Wing

    June 10, 2011 at 11:19 pm

    Kinda sad that some people will take whatever little scraps they get instead of demanding that their president do the right thing. Our system is corrupt, and the better of 2 evils is still evil. Obama is a BAD president. Bush was a BAD president. And people who preach that we can’t get away from a 2 party system are simple BAD at democracy.

  155. 155.

    TG Chicago

    June 10, 2011 at 11:34 pm

    So the gay left fought for what they wanted, got it, and now that means that other progressives should bring out the hate machine. Great plan.

    Squeaky wheel, guys. It’s not complicated.

  156. 156.

    The Sheriff's A Ni-

    June 10, 2011 at 11:39 pm

    @Christopher Wing:
    1.) Duvarger’s Law
    2.) Ask the French, British, and Canadians how a multi-party system has been working out for them.

  157. 157.

    PhoenixRising

    June 10, 2011 at 11:54 pm

    @Marc McKenzie: Close, but remember—the Teabaggers went out there and voted. They didn’t stay home pouting, ā€œNot getting my vote! I’m sending a message! Not a dime’s worth of difference!ā€

    Wait, what? This jumped out among all the poor abused straw laying strewn asunder. Say what you want about Aravois–gawd knows I do, he banned me for calling him some highly justified names–no one is suggesting that he doesn’t encourage Voting.

    Siphoning my wallet, no. Voting, yes.

  158. 158.

    OzoneR

    June 11, 2011 at 12:04 am

    @Just Some Fuckhead: Good for Nick, maybe more people should, it’s a real problem.

  159. 159.

    OzoneR

    June 11, 2011 at 12:18 am

    @Christopher Wing:

    And people who preach that we can’t get away from a 2 party system are simple BAD at democracy.

    every democracy is essentially a two party system, because there can only be a minority and majority, in multi-party systems, they just form coalitions where they have to deal with the same bullshit, pleasing parties in the coalition.

    And I think it’s really sad that you see this as “scraps”

  160. 160.

    Ronbo

    June 11, 2011 at 9:43 am

    @OzoneR: Lets get the facts straight. The Obama Justice Dept has identified an element of DOMA that they do not support. They continue to enforce DOMA. Remember, there is a difference between saying something and doing something. The Obama Justice Dept continues to enforce DOMA. Facts are important. Headlines can be deceiving.

  161. 161.

    Ronbo

    June 11, 2011 at 9:47 am

    @OzoneR: Promoting compromise by saying non-equality is OK is just wrong. How about you consider this: One group wants to put you in jail for being a bigot. Another group wants to end your life for being a bigot. Compromis is not torturing you in jail. OzoneR being a bigot is not a jailable or death-sentence qualifing situtation. You can’t compromise inalienable rights, my foolish bigot.

  162. 162.

    Ronbo

    June 11, 2011 at 10:00 am

    @Marc McKenzie: Obviously, I not smart as you. I can’t draw nymphs with giant breasts and bulging vaginas. I love the pouty lips and big, big eyes. “Love is….” I don’t have the talent to create new, willing and exciting girlfriends on paper. I just don’t know which luscious cartoon girlfried you’ll be drawing/dating tonight.

    I live in the real world. Join us when you have both hands free.

  163. 163.

    Brachiator

    June 11, 2011 at 11:08 am

    @Christopher Wing:

    And people who preach that we can’t get away from a 2 party system are simple BAD at democracy.

    Have you watched the news lately? It’s not about the number of parties. In the UK, the coalition of the conservatives and the Lib Dems is little more than a nightmare, and somehow, despite all the various parties in Canada, the conservative Harper government emerged stronger than ever.

    And your “Obama is bad, Bush was bad” mantra makes no sense. I don’t understand how anyone looking at what the GOP is doing at the state level would want to risk unleashing this stuff at the federal level, unless they had a death wish.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Political Animal - Monday’s Mini-Report says:
    June 13, 2011 at 7:29 pm

    […] The Obama administration is expanding benefits to same-sex couples under […]

Primary Sidebar

šŸŽˆKeep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • opiejeanne on Proud To Be A Democrat (Feb 9, 2023 @ 4:10am)
  • TriassicSands on Proud To Be A Democrat (Feb 9, 2023 @ 3:37am)
  • Kathleen on Proud To Be A Democrat (Feb 9, 2023 @ 3:21am)
  • NotMax on Proud To Be A Democrat (Feb 9, 2023 @ 3:16am)
  • opiejeanne on Proud To Be A Democrat (Feb 9, 2023 @ 3:09am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice Ā Ā 

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14 Ā The Apocalypse
5/20 Ā Home Away from Home
5/29 Ā We’re Back, Baby
7/21 Ā Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!