• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

How stupid are these people?

The willow is too close to the house.

There are times when telling just part of the truth is effectively a lie.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

The revolution will be supervised.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

You cannot love your country only when you win.

Lick the third rail, it tastes like chocolate!

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

This country desperately needs a functioning fourth estate.

Fight them, without becoming them!

Republicans: The threats are dire, but my tickets are non-refundable!

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. do not touch it.”

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Our messy unity will be our strength.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

Marge, god is saying you’re stupid.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Electile dysfunction

Electile dysfunction

by DougJ|  June 16, 20111:43 pm| 58 Comments

This post is in: We Are All Mayans Now

FacebookTweetEmail

In a sane world, this would be a bigger story than a Congressmen tweeting shirtless pictures of himself. (Edit: Sorry for the double post.)

Glenn L. Carle, a former Central Intelligence Agency officer who was a top counterterrorism official during the administration of President George W. Bush, said the White House at least twice asked intelligence officials to gather sensitive information on Juan Cole, a University of Michigan professor who writes an influential blog that criticized the war.

In an interview, Mr. Carle said his supervisor at the National Intelligence Council told him in 2005 that White House officials wanted “to get” Professor Cole, and made clear that he wanted Mr. Carle to collect information about him, an effort Mr. Carle rebuffed. Months later, Mr. Carle said, he confronted a C.I.A. official after learning of another attempt to collect information about Professor Cole. Mr. Carle said he contended at the time that such actions would have been unlawful.

I’m sure this guy has a book to sell. Also too, it’s worth nothing that the AIPAC crowd seems to have stopped Yale from hiring Cole.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Weiner Out
Next Post: Not Ready For Prime Time…an Update »

Reader Interactions

58Comments

  1. 1.

    scav

    June 16, 2011 at 1:46 pm

    Regret for a sane world? How retro. Takes me right back.

  2. 2.

    Pliny

    June 16, 2011 at 1:46 pm

    Dude, the same article is already here TWO POSTS DOWN

  3. 3.

    UncertaintyVicePrincipal

    June 16, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    I don’t know, it seems to me I’ve actually been seeing that story everywhere.

    Oh wait, I haven’t left Balloon Juice. Never mind.

  4. 4.

    Studly Pantload, a full-service troll

    June 16, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    You can tell we’re in the summer reruns season.

  5. 5.

    eemom

    June 16, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    splendiforous post title, even if it’s not a song lyric.

  6. 6.

    Chris

    June 16, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    Also too, it’s worth nothing that the AIPAC crowd seems to have stopped Yale from hiring Cole.

    A comment on this:

    I had a friend when studying abroad in Cairo, who was majoring in the study of modern Islamic political movements, and for his senior year capstone project, hesitated for the longest time between covering Hamas and covering the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. His counselor finally talked him into covering the MB – and her argument was that if he wrote anything remotely accurate or academically honest on an Israel-related subject, he’d end up with enough doors shut in his face to end his career before it began.

    Not that either of them had any sympathy for Hamas. But on Israel/Palestine issues, anything other than the lockstep party line = you’re out (a professor at my alma mater was also denied tenure for that reason). Not surprising that it would have been enough to block Juan Cole, especially in as visible a university as Yale.

    (And it throws the Republican party line, about how our universities are hotbeds of pro-Palestinian activism where professors indoctrinate us with stealth antisemitism, into laughable perspective).

  7. 7.

    bkny

    June 16, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    there really isn’t anyone surprised by this, is there? give it up. this country is beyond recovery. the rule of law is no longer.

  8. 8.

    Studly Pantload, a full-service troll

    June 16, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    @eemom And the juxtaposition with the title of the previous post on the top of this comments page has a nice little kismet goin’ for it, too.

  9. 9.

    LittlePig

    June 16, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    And it throws the Republican party line, about how our universities are hotbeds of pro-Palestinian activism where professors indoctrinate us with stealth antisemitism, into laughable perspective

    And that distinguishes it from every other Republican party line how, exactly?

  10. 10.

    Mike Kay (True Grit)

    June 16, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    In a sane world, this would be a bigger story than a Congressmen tweeting shirtless pictures of himself.

    Yet, wiener is the number one diary on DKos. So, even the vaunted reality based blogophere is not immune.

  11. 11.

    LittlePig

    June 16, 2011 at 1:57 pm

    the rule of law is no longer.

    Bush v. Gore was the Constitution’s swan song. It’s been might money makes right ever since.

  12. 12.

    John Cole

    June 16, 2011 at 1:58 pm

    I thought my title was better.

  13. 13.

    eemom

    June 16, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    speaking of genitally based song titles, does anyone remember “Detachable P*nis”?

    Weiner sure could’ve used one of THOSE, haw haw.

  14. 14.

    LittlePig

    June 16, 2011 at 2:00 pm

    Absolutely John. Doug needs more Elvis.

  15. 15.

    MikeJ

    June 16, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    @Littlepig:

    Bush v. Gore was the Constitution’s swan song

    Pity you didn’t read the book club’s selection on Nixon. NObody really thinks this is anything new, do they?

  16. 16.

    scav

    June 16, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    Title Fight! Title Fight!

    seriously, why not add a best title of the year along side the quote of the year?

  17. 17.

    Bender

    June 16, 2011 at 2:03 pm

    In a sane world, this would be a bigger story than a Congressmen tweeting shirtless pictures of himself.

    That had to be the most intentionally obtuse reading of the Weiner situation I’ve heard to date. “Shirtless!” Hah! Yeah, that was the problem, Doug. No shirt! LOL!

    But to your point, a 6-year-old story with no impact on anything and no tangible result should be a bigger story than a sitting Congressman cyber-flashing unsuspecting college students. Clearly.

    Because the former might impugn Republicans, while the latter resulted in a Democrat being humiliated into resignation. And that’s the real standard to which you adhere.

  18. 18.

    LittlePig

    June 16, 2011 at 2:07 pm

    @ MikeJ

    Yes, I do disagree. Nixon got his ass booted out. As Daniel Elsberg noted Tuesday (40th anniversary of the NYT publication of The Pentagon Papers) that nothing the Watergate burglars did was illegal under USAPATRIOT.

    What once were vices are now habits. Big difference.

  19. 19.

    scav

    June 16, 2011 at 2:07 pm

    Bender: Yeah, that was the earlier guy that went shirtless. “No Shirt. No Shoes. No Pants. No Service.” Operating motto of congress. No Shit Sherlock.

  20. 20.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 16, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    @Cole
    no, DougJ’s is better. It has sex in it.

    btw you got an approving link on your concern trolling of Obama from EDK.

  21. 21.

    J.A.F. Rusty Shackleford

    June 16, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    Can you imagine the sounds coming from Glenn Beckistan if a Demo’rat administration sicced the CIA on a right-wing critic? Or if Demo’rats were indoctrinating youth with propaganda summer camps?

  22. 22.

    Villago Delenda Est

    June 16, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    Pity you didn’t read the book club’s selection on Nixon

    That’s when the rot set in. The blanket pardon of the vile criminal Nixon, by his successor, Gerald Ford.

    It can all be traced back to that.

    “Rule of Law”, my ass. Nixon should have gone to prison for what he did…obstruction of justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice.

    It appears that the “reply” icons have been disabled on the site…so this is a response to MikeJ’s #15.

  23. 23.

    Bender

    June 16, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    Even if Doug was referring to Chris Lee, he’s still wrong, and still being very generous to Lee.

  24. 24.

    Zifnab

    June 16, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    Where did the “Reply” button get to?!

    Regardless, this is probably Obama’s biggest failure to date. The whole “live and let live” with the Bush Admin cronies has basically guaranteed a future crop of flunkies will behave even worse than the last guys.

    Clinton knew what he was doing when he fired all 92 USAs after the Bush/Reagen Era. He played hard ball. Obama is still trying to make friends. *sigh*

  25. 25.

    Zifnab

    June 16, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    Can you imagine the sounds coming from Glenn Beckistan if a Demo’rat administration sicced the CIA on a right-wing critic? Or if Demo’rats were indoctrinating youth with propaganda summer camps?

    Hahaha! Probably exactly the same as he does now. “Conspiracies! Conspiracies! Everywhere!”

  26. 26.

    licensed to kill time

    June 16, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    ♪♫ I called you on the phone, but you were not at home, No Reply ♪♫

  27. 27.

    Loneoak

    June 16, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    Why would you want to teach at Yale anyway? Hail to the Victors!

  28. 28.

    KG

    June 16, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    Bender: let’s see on one hand we had a guy talking about making the world safe for freedom using intelligence agencies to spy on a citizen who disagreed with his policies… on the other hand we had a guy sending naked pictures of himself on line to adult women.

    Yes, I can see how the second one would be bad for America and the first one no big deal…

  29. 29.

    AAA Bonds

    June 16, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    Well, holy shit.

  30. 30.

    Chris

    June 16, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    Pity you didn’t read the book club’s selection on Nixon. NObody really thinks this is anything new, do they?

    Didn’t it used to be worse, in fact? The Palmer Raids, the World War Two internments, the Red Scare, COINTELPRO? And of course, Lincoln actually suspended habeas corpus during the Civil War.

    Yes, I do disagree. Nixon got his ass booted out. As Daniel Elsberg noted Tuesday (40th anniversary of the NYT publication of The Pentagon Papers) that nothing the Watergate burglars did was illegal under USAPATRIOT.

    Yeah, the 1970s were pretty much the high point of attempts to rein in that shit – hence Nixon’s resignation and the Church Committee hearings. But I’d say that was a pretty unusual moment, not exactly the rule. (It came on the heels of fifty years of J. Edgar Hoover’s shenanigans, after all).

  31. 31.

    Brachiator

    June 16, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    In a sane world, this would be a bigger story than a Congressmen tweeting shirtless pictures of himself.

    Actually, I would vote for this one: Pakistan’s Chief of Army Fights to Keep His Job

    I know that Americans of all ideologies think that only what happens in the US and to Americans is important, but this is a big deal. From the NY Times (no link since I am not sure what the deal is the with Times paysite)

    Pakistan’s army chief, the most powerful man in the country, is fighting to save his position in the face of seething anger from top generals and junior officers since the American raid that killed Osama bin Laden, according to Pakistani officials and people who have met the chief in recent weeks.

    Remember that Leon Panetta had recently been to Pakistan to try to smooth things over. And the US military had been leaning toward supporting the Pakistan Army over the civilian government, supposedly to ensure co-operation with the war on terror.

    And here’s the part that might get some attention:

    A long statement after the regular monthly meeting of the 11 corps commanders last week illuminated the mounting hostility toward the United States, even as it remains the army’s biggest patron, supplying at least $2 billion a year in aid.
    __
    The statement said that the C.I.A.-run drone attacks against militants in the tribal areas “were not acceptable under any circumstances.”
    __
    Allowing the drones to continue to operate from Pakistan was “politically unsustainable,” said the well-informed Pakistani who met with General Kayani recently. As part of his survival mechanism, General Kayani could well order the Americans to stop the drone program completely, the Pakistani said.

    So, the US might stop killing “brown people” in Pakistan so that the Pakistan military and intelligence services can oppress “brown people” in Pakistan and kill “brown people” in India, while still getting US arms aid.

    I guess some would call this a win/win situation.

    Disclaimer: No nuclear weapons or suitcase nukes were discussed during the drafting of this comment.

  32. 32.

    slag

    June 16, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    This double post has value (kind of) because DougJ puts the emphasis on the problems with our media, in general, while JC puts it on the problems with our security state. It’s hard to not see the connection between those two things.

    Why is this not a bigger scandal? Seriously. It’s got intrigue, villainy, and subterfuge. Whole television shows are based on plot lines just like this one. And yet, the entire media brigade glosses over it in favor of the Weinus. The Weinus would hardly make for a mildly comedic subplot! And yet, here we are. Even The Daily Show can’t get enough of the Weinus. Zzzzzzzzzzzz.

    How is this espionage story not way more compelling? I don’t understand.

  33. 33.

    ppcli

    June 16, 2011 at 2:34 pm

    Thus Spake Loneoak:
    “Why would you want to teach at Yale anyway? Hail to the Victors!”

    Absolutely – Go Blue! I wish AIPAC would scuttle *more* attempted raids on our faculty by those rich Ivy Leaguers.

  34. 34.

    ppcli

    June 16, 2011 at 2:44 pm

    Reply Button’s Gone! Dammit! That is inadequate to my Hamiltonian… Hamiltonian… graph! I’m typing the rest of this comment under protest.

    Anyway, it’s to Chris at 6.

    Actually it’s worth remembering, in connection with Weiner, whose hagiography is being composed as we speak, that he was one of the most vocal shriekers at Columbia U. when they had some Palestinian-American prof whose lectures were judged by a couple of unhappy students to be unacceptably far from the party line. And as I recall the positions he was adopting were absolutely defensible – pointing out that Israel is an occupying power, perhaps (don’t remember the details). Weiner was demanding a Columbia University inquiry, and then (IIRC) when he got one that said “nothing here” he demanded another one.

    That was a deal-breaker for me, as far as supporting Weiner was concerned.

  35. 35.

    Martin

    June 16, 2011 at 2:57 pm

    So, the US might stop killing “brown people” in Pakistan so that the Pakistan military and intelligence services can oppress “brown people” in Pakistan and kill “brown people” in India, while still getting US arms aid.

    Yeah, that’s not why we’re there. We’re there because Pakistan has about 100 nukes, and I don’t think that sovereignty issues are going to trump us making sure that those don’t fall in to the hands of the Taliban or Al Qaeda. Most of the aid was supposed to help Pakistan secure that material. Unfortunately, the Pakistani Army is paranoid about the idea that we might go in and snatch that stuff. If there’s anything in Bin Laden’s document dump that suggests that he had connections within the army, then I don’t think Panetta was just there to smooth things over.

  36. 36.

    MikeJ

    June 16, 2011 at 3:00 pm

    @34: Which is a perfectly fine reason to not like him. What he does with his dick is irrelevant though.

    I don’t see any difference between the the Republicans who shriek for his head and the “liberals” who want to take him down for the same reasons. Both are happy to have a political enemy gone. Nobody really cares about his dick. It’s just a convenient way to score points.

  37. 37.

    Stefan

    June 16, 2011 at 3:02 pm

    But to your point, a 6-year-old story with no impact on anything and no tangible result should be a bigger story than a sitting Congressman cyber-flashing unsuspecting college students.

    The college students! Won’t someone please think of the legally adult yet somehow helpless college students!

  38. 38.

    AnotherBruce

    June 16, 2011 at 3:03 pm

    I’m sure that the only reason the CIA was trying to dig dirt on Juan Cole was to be seen as being fair and balanced after they started a similar hatchet campaign on Professor Glenn Reynolds of the University of Tennessee.

  39. 39.

    Chris

    June 16, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    That was a deal-breaker for me, as far as supporting Weiner was concerned.

    I understand and don’t disagree, but frankly, I’ve long since given up finding anyone in Washington who does anything but that do or endorse that kind of shit.

    Some are better, some are worse (Weiner was being a douche, and Mike Huckabee, who openly claps and cheers for ethnic cleansing in the West Bank, is as bad as it gets). But even those who aren’t dicks about it will do little or nothing to stop those who are. I’m at the point where by the end of this century, I don’t expect there to be a Palestinian state – maybe Gaza, but not the West Bank – or any hope of one returning.

  40. 40.

    Chris

    June 16, 2011 at 3:11 pm

    Yeah, that’s not why we’re there. We’re there because Pakistan has about 100 nukes, and I don’t think that sovereignty issues are going to trump us making sure that those don’t fall in to the hands of the Taliban or Al Qaeda. Most of the aid was supposed to help Pakistan secure that material. Unfortunately, the Pakistani Army is paranoid about the idea that we might go in and snatch that stuff. If there’s anything in Bin Laden’s document dump that suggests that he had connections within the army, then I don’t think Panetta was just there to smooth things over.

    Of course. We wouldn’t have half the interest that we do in Pakistan if it weren’t for their nuclear arsenal.

  41. 41.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 16, 2011 at 3:12 pm

    Allowing the drones to continue to operate from Pakistan was “politically unsustainable,” said the well-informed Pakistani who met with General Kayani recently. As part of his survival mechanism, General Kayani could well order the Americans to stop the drone program completely, the Pakistani said.

    Droning is destabilizing the Zardari government.
    Panetta needs to smack down the Taliban hard enough to headfake a powersharing arrangement with the Karzai government so we can GTFO before the Arab Spring comes to AfPak.

    We have NOTHING to show for 10 years, trillions of dollars, thousands of dead soljahs, hundreds of thousands of dead muslims and millions of muslims that are going to hate America for the next 50 years.

    Unfortunately, the Pakistani Army is paranoid about the idea that we might go in and snatch that stuff.

    No they aren’t. we certainly might do that. But more imperative is the fact that the droning and destabilizing Zardaris government.
    Pakistanis are burning American flags over the CIA contractor too.

  42. 42.

    slag

    June 16, 2011 at 3:14 pm

    I’m sure that the only reason the CIA was trying to dig dirt on Juan Cole was to be seen as being fair and balanced after they started a similar hatchet campaign on Professor Glenn Reynolds of the University of Tennessee.

    Link?

  43. 43.

    Brachiator

    June 16, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    @Martin:

    Yeah, that’s not why we’re there. We’re there because Pakistan has about 100 nukes, and I don’t think that sovereignty issues are going to trump us making sure that those don’t fall in to the hands of the Taliban or Al Qaeda. Most of the aid was supposed to help Pakistan secure that material.

    This is not true. As I have suggested before, US aid indirectly helped Pakistan develop its nuclear program. The country is otherwise much poorer than its great enemy India,and might have reached some accommodation with India over Kashmir without the underpinning of US aid.

    The best guess is that Pakistan wants its nukes to use as tactical weapons if they go to war with India. The US has absolutely no influence over Pakistan in this regard. And the US is never, never, ever going to go in and snatch up the nukes.

    Pakistan may now have between 70 and 120 usable nuclear devices—and may be unusually ready to use them. Some in the West believe Pakistan started preparing nuclear-tipped missiles in the midst of the 1999 Kargil war against India, after Pakistan invaded a remote corner of Kashmir.
    __
    Nobody doubts that Pakistan, in the midst of its anxiety over India, is trying hard to get more. Its nuclear warheads use an implosion design with a solid core of about 15-20 kilograms of highly enriched uranium. The country produces about 100 kilograms of that a year, but is rapidly expanding its nuclear infrastructure with Chinese help….
    __
    The new push seems, as ever, to be a response to two developments next door. Pakistan was badly spooked by India’s deal on civil nuclear power with America, completed in 2008….
    __
    The other change is over doctrine and delivery. India has long held a position of “no first use” of nukes. Pakistan, by contrast, with weaker conventional forces, refuses to rule out the option of starting a nuclear war against India, and is now taking steps that could make such first use more likely. Last month it test-fired a new missile, the Hatf IX, with a range of just 60km and specifically designed for war-fighting. Two missiles are carried in tubes on a transporter and can be fired, accurately, at short notice. The warheads are small, low-yielding devices for destroying large tank formations with relatively little explosive damage or radiation beyond the battlefield.
    __
    Pakistan’s generals say their new tactical weapons will meet a threat from India’s Cold Start doctrine, adopted in 2004, that calls for rapid, punitive, though conventional thrusts against Pakistan. But by rolling out tactical nuclear weapons, Pakistan is stirring fears of instability. Previous efforts to reassure observers that terrorists or rogue army officers could not get hold of nukes rested on the fact that warheads and delivery systems were stored separately and were difficult to fire—and that final authority to launch a strike requires “consensus” within the National Command Authority, which includes various ministers and the heads of all three services, and is chaired by the prime minister.

    And of course bin Laden had connections with the army or the intelligence service. Pakistan plays elements of Al Qaeda and other groups against the US. Always has. Always will.

    And oh yeah, if Pakistan loses control of its nukes, it risks immediate and punitive reaction by India, who in turn would risk immediate and punitive reaction by China. And who knows what Russia, the US or Israel might do. This is not a good situation for anyone.

    The larger issues is that the US has sided with the Pakistan military over the weak civilian government. This was a dangerous game. If the Pakistan army chief is deposed, the US will have even less influence, which in a weird way might be a good thing.

    The Bush Administration got outplayed by Pakistan, even though Musharraf stepped down. The Obama Administration has done somewhat better (they were able to get bin Laden), but are dealing with a people who have a strong sense of their own national interest independent of any dreams and desires that the US might have.

  44. 44.

    ppcli

    June 16, 2011 at 3:23 pm

    @36 Well, yeah, I agree that this is a terrible reason for resigning. I’m just indicating why I am not weeping too hard about his departure.

  45. 45.

    ppcli

    June 16, 2011 at 3:24 pm

    @42 This was snark, shoorly.

  46. 46.

    Fucen Pneumatic Fuck Wrench Tarmal

    June 16, 2011 at 3:25 pm

    anyone else think the fund raising potential and national exposure of special elections has gone to some folks heads?

    i’m not saying weiner didn’t know the game he was playing, and perhaps dying on this hill was necessary if you are going to mount an assault on clarence thomas. you can’t have your own coke cans in your closet. it just seems like rocking out with your weiner out isn’t or shouldn’t be that big of a deal.

    and brietbart wins, i still find the whole thing annoying.

  47. 47.

    Chris

    June 16, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    @ Brachiator:

    This is not true. As I have suggested before, US aid indirectly helped Pakistan develop its nuclear program. The country is otherwise much poorer than its great enemy India,and might have reached some accommodation with India over Kashmir without the underpinning of US aid.

    Yep. Cold War chess set, I believe: the Soviets backed India, so we backed Pakistan. (Or maybe we backed Pakistan, so the Soviets backed India? Either one).

    The best guess is that Pakistan wants its nukes to use as tactical weapons if they go to war with India.

    More likely (or maybe I’m just being hopeful), they simply want the nukes as a deterrent, same as everyone else who has them. Considering their size relative to India and how well they’ve done during armed conflicts, they probably think it’s their only effective way to threaten India.

    The US has absolutely no influence over Pakistan in this regard. And the US is never, never, ever going to go in and snatch up the nukes.

    I don’t think so either, but that doesn’t mean the Pakistanis aren’t afraid of the U.S. doing so or trying to do so.

    but are dealing with a people who have a strong sense of their own national interest independent of any dreams and desires that the US might have.

    Story of our life, isn’t it? China, Cuba, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, to name only those… all countries that have a strong sense of their national identity and get jumpy whenever a foreign power starts playing games with them (even Gaullist France fits the mold to some extent). For some reason, we’re always surprised when we find out that other people have the same powerful sense of identity that we ourselves have. (Maybe it’s an American Exceptionalism thing – we see our country as so exceptional that we can’t even understand that any other people might feel the same way about their own).

  48. 48.

    Lolis

    June 16, 2011 at 3:31 pm

    Weiner’s total capitulation to the AIPAC crowd is the main reason I was never a fan.

  49. 49.

    slag

    June 16, 2011 at 3:34 pm

    @45 I thought it might be, but I didn’t want to assume. It’s so hard to tell these days.

  50. 50.

    AnotherBruce

    June 16, 2011 at 3:38 pm

    Yes snark, IOKIYGR.

  51. 51.

    slag

    June 16, 2011 at 3:41 pm

    @50 Thank you. I thought it might be [OK if you are Glenn Reynolds].

  52. 52.

    AnotherBruce

    June 16, 2011 at 3:49 pm

    Did Tunch eat the reply app?

  53. 53.

    Ghanima Atreides

    June 16, 2011 at 3:57 pm

    And the US is never, never, ever going to go in and snatch up the nukes.

    Lie. There is a classified program designed to do just that.

  54. 54.

    Brachiator

    June 16, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    @Ghanima Atreides
    RE: And the US is never, never, ever going to go in and snatch up the nukes.

    Lie. There is a classified program designed to do just that.

    Paranoid, much?

    If it’s classified, how come you know about it?

    But you miss my larger point. I don’t care what the US thinks it might be able to do to Pakistan. Lots of governments have plans and shit. Making it work is another thing altogether.

  55. 55.

    AnotherBruce

    June 16, 2011 at 4:23 pm

    @53 Wait, Pakistan is our ally, we would never do that.

    Man I’m getting cynical and snarky all the time. I used to be such a sweet sweet thing ’til they got ahold of me.

  56. 56.

    Brachiator

    June 16, 2011 at 5:32 pm

    @Chris:

    Yep. Cold War chess set, I believe: the Soviets backed India, so we backed Pakistan. (Or maybe we backed Pakistan, so the Soviets backed India? Either one).

    It’s worse than that. Even though there were (gasp) commies in the Indian government, India was officially non-aligned. But the Cold War mentality leaned toward “with us or against us.” So the US backed Pakistan, totally ignoring the entirely separate and independent game of threeway chess that Pakistan, India and China were playing with one another.

    And the madness continues.

  57. 57.

    Brian

    June 16, 2011 at 6:12 pm

    Ah, Juan Cole. I have a lot of respect for a lot of his work, but he was incredibly unfair and disrespectful to me in the midst of a discussion about one of his posts. Now, I used to agree with him at least 90% of the time, and I’m not anywhere NEAR the AIPAC crowd, but I am now one who has serious doubts whether his obvious bias really does cloud his judgment. That terribly interesting anecdote aside (sorry, its just that he was such a reactionary a$$hole), this is deeply troubling stuff. NO ONE should be subject to this treatment from the government. I can feel the hatred for our freedoms growing…

  58. 58.

    Petorado

    June 17, 2011 at 1:05 am

    Still can’t believe no one’s used the headline, “Congress Interuptus: Weiner Pulls Out.”

    Sorry. Someone had to get it over with.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - way2blue - SINALEI, SAMOA—RESPITE EDITION—FEBRUARY 2025.  (second of five) 7
Image by way2blue (7/13/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • Chetan Murthy on Late Night Open Thread: Buyer’s Remorse (Jul 14, 2025 @ 2:22am)
  • AlaskaReader on War for Ukraine Day 1,235: A Brief Sunday Night Update (Jul 14, 2025 @ 2:19am)
  • Chetan Murthy on Late Night Open Thread: Buyer’s Remorse (Jul 14, 2025 @ 2:19am)
  • danielx on Late Night Open Thread: Buyer’s Remorse (Jul 14, 2025 @ 2:18am)
  • Craig on Medium Cool – Navel Gazing! (Jul 14, 2025 @ 2:16am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!