• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Republican speaker of the house Mike Johnson is the bland and smiling face of evil.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

The republican caucus is covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

When we show up, we win.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Consistently wrong since 2002

The fundamental promise of conservatism all over the world is a return to an idealized past that never existed.

He really is that stupid.

When you’re in more danger from the IDF than from Russian shelling, that’s really bad.

After dobbs, women are no longer free.

Following reporting rules is only for the little people, apparently.

Second rate reporter says what?

An unpunished coup is a training exercise.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Shut up, hissy kitty!

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

GOP baffled that ‘we don’t care if you die’ is not a winning slogan.

Even though I know this is a bad idea, I’m off to do it anyway!

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

Russia bombs Ukraine’s maternity hospitals; Republicans in the House can’t sort out supporting Ukraine.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Civil Rights / Racial Justice / Post-racial America / And When They Were Done Starting Fires, They Raped Babies, Plowed the Earth With Salt, and Gave Everyone Bird Flu

And When They Were Done Starting Fires, They Raped Babies, Plowed the Earth With Salt, and Gave Everyone Bird Flu

by John Cole|  June 20, 20119:21 pm| 90 Comments

This post is in: Post-racial America, Assholes, Mainstream Media's McCain Mancrush

FacebookTweetEmail

Grampa Simpson at it again:

In comments made over the weekend, Senator John McCain R-AZ., blamed illegal immigrants for the some wildfires that have raged across his state of Arizona.

“There is substantial evidence that some of these fires have been caused by people who have crossed our border illegally,” McCain said Saturday at a press conference. “The answer to that part of the problem is to get a secure border.”’

The Senator from Arizona’s comments set off a wildfire of their own, as the Wallow Fire currently blazes across his state across 500,000 miles.

A forest service spokesman on the Wallow fire in Arizona says there’s no evidence that this specific fire was caused by immigrants.

I still can not believe that there are people who want to argue that there would have been no difference between the current Obama administration and a McCain/Palin reign of terror.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « You Did This!
Next Post: I know I keep harping on about this… »

Reader Interactions

90Comments

  1. 1.

    slag

    June 20, 2011 at 9:25 pm

    Back in my day, only legal immigrants were allowed to buy matches.

  2. 2.

    different church-lady

    June 20, 2011 at 9:25 pm

    Allow me to be the first to state that once again you are trolling your own blog (in spite of the fact that such a statement doesn’t make the slightest scrap of sense).

  3. 3.

    Dr. Loveless

    June 20, 2011 at 9:25 pm

    Another day, another thing to blame the brown people for.

  4. 4.

    Barb (formerly Gex)

    June 20, 2011 at 9:30 pm

    Sure some of them were started by people here illegally. But what about the rest of the fires which were started by people here legally?

    That’s how this works, isn’t it? Or do I not understand wildfires?

  5. 5.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    June 20, 2011 at 9:31 pm

    Of course there’s no difference: McCain wouldn’t have gone after bin Laden and Obama wouldn’t repeal DADT. See, they’re equivalent.

  6. 6.

    shortstop

    June 20, 2011 at 9:32 pm

    Allow me to be the first to state that once again you are trolling your own blog (in spite of the fact that such a statement doesn’t make the slightest scrap of sense).

    Cole has characterized himself as “trolling my own blog” on multiple occasions. Don’t think he’s doing it this time, however.

  7. 7.

    slag

    June 20, 2011 at 9:32 pm

    Another day, another thing to blame the brown people for.

    Either brown people, the gays, the feminists, or the environmentalists.

    I’m surprised Gramps didn’t run the board with this one by claiming that undocumented lesbians started the fire when they were rushing through a candlelight vigil against climate change on their way to the abortion clinic.

  8. 8.

    Baud

    June 20, 2011 at 9:35 pm

    Consider it progress. A few years ago, I’m sure McCain would have blamed the Arizona fires on the gays.

  9. 9.

    James E. Powell

    June 20, 2011 at 9:36 pm

    No sane person really believes that “Obama is no better than [some Republican].” It is just hyperbole. There are a lot of good reasons to be frustrated with Obama. This is no more than an over-heated way of expressing that frustration.

    There are, no doubt, a few people who actually believe this, but while they may be a vocal and visible component of the blogosphere, they are such a tiny part of the electorate that they can be safely ignored.

  10. 10.

    Uncle Clarence Thomas

    June 20, 2011 at 9:37 pm

    .
    .

    I still can not believe that there are people who want to argue that there would have been no difference between an Obama administration and a McCain/Palin reign of terror.

    I’ve certainly never argued that there would have been no difference. However, your comment does beg the question: “On a scale of 1 to 100 percentage points, how much better is the Obama administration than a McCain administration would have been?”
    .
    .

  11. 11.

    different church-lady

    June 20, 2011 at 9:39 pm

    @ James E. Powell (#9)

    they are such a tiny part of the electorate that they can be safely ignored.

    Maybe they can be safely ignored, but they cannot be practically ignored — it would be like trying to ignore someone screaming at you with a bullhorn at a distance of 3 inches.

  12. 12.

    Lolis

    June 20, 2011 at 9:42 pm

    My friend’s husband is a firefighter. He is currently traveling around the Southwest to fight fires. She told me a little know secret which is that firefighters have been known to start fires because many firefighters only get paid when they are working. Apparently there are a lot of limits about hours and pay that change all the time too. He believes it somewhat common practice to have firefighters start fires.

  13. 13.

    Baud

    June 20, 2011 at 9:43 pm

    “On a scale of 1 to 100 percentage points, how much better is the Obama administration than a McCain administration would have been?”

    I’d put it in the high 90’s, but some may disagree.

  14. 14.

    slag

    June 20, 2011 at 9:44 pm

    “On a scale of 1 to 100 percentage points, how much better is the Obama administration than a McCain administration would have been?”

    100,000,000,003. And if I followed Sarah Palin’s twitter feed, I’d probably give Obama more.

  15. 15.

    MikeJ

    June 20, 2011 at 9:46 pm

    There are, no doubt, a few people who actually believe this, but while they may be a vocal and visible component of the blogosphere, they are such a tiny part of the electorate that they can be safely ignored.

    And some of them are actually employee by Republicans, (direfoglake).

  16. 16.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    June 20, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    In the “I can’t believe it and at the same time it’s all too predictable” category, this vainglorious mediocrity is still treated as a wise elder statesman by The Village. See also, too, Lieberman, Joe, he’s in Israel with Glen Beck

  17. 17.

    jl

    June 20, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    I am very critical of Obama on many policies.

    I am especially critical of Obama on his economic policy. I don’t see it as betrayal. I think he doesn’t understand it very well, and is confused, and perhaps reluctantly, his on economics have evolved to align with Geithner’s.

    In terms of electioneering, I think it is important to be careful how we criticize Obama. Politically active people who always show up for elections, very active people who usually work in them, probably won’t swing the next election. Probably less active voters will decide it, more by deciding whether to show up at the polls or not, than anything else.

    The GOP and the corporate media, for their own reasons would like a dispirited Democratic electorate. It would be mistake to be critical in a way that discourages a very active and motivated electorate of Democratic and independent voters.

  18. 18.

    Violet

    June 20, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    A forest service spokesman on the Wallow fire in Arizona says there’s no evidence that this specific fire was caused by immigrants.

    “This specific fire.” Which means, in wingnut-speak, that many other fires must have been set by immigrants. What other interpretation could there be?

  19. 19.

    OzoneR

    June 20, 2011 at 9:48 pm

    Both sides do it. Republicans blame illegal immigrants for problems they didn’t cause, while Democrats disrespect them for criticize them for their misstatements.

  20. 20.

    Alex S.

    June 20, 2011 at 9:48 pm

    Well… McCain also would have sent troops to Libya, ha!

  21. 21.

    Baud

    June 20, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    Well… McCain also would have sent troops to Libya, ha!

    Which he would have redeployed from Iran…

  22. 22.

    Mike M

    June 20, 2011 at 9:52 pm

    Here in Phoenix at least, all our problems in Arizona are blamed on illegal immigrants, whether it’s the high cost of health care, the cost and poor performance of our schools, the lack of jobs, drug use, crime, etc. After housing construction collapsed here, the immigration population dropped dramatically, but you would never know it from listening to the local politicians.

    Immigrants make convenient scapegoats, and I’m sure it was just as true 100 years ago when my ancestors stepped off the boat.

  23. 23.

    Loneoak

    June 20, 2011 at 9:53 pm

    “On a scale of 1 to 100 percentage points, how much better is the Obama administration than a McCain administration would have been?”

    1, because 1 is already infinitely more than the terrifying zero that would have been the other option.

  24. 24.

    Sasha

    June 20, 2011 at 9:53 pm

    Apparently, some of the circumstantial evidence is that these fires started where border crossings are common. (But doesn’t that make it equally likely that an anti-immigrant zealot set the fires in order to stem the unwashed tide?)

  25. 25.

    beltane

    June 20, 2011 at 9:54 pm

    Why are all these rich old Aryans living so close to Mexico anyway? They son’t stand a chance against the Mexicans and their ability to cause all these natural disasters solely by virtue of their awesome Mexicaness.

  26. 26.

    shortstop

    June 20, 2011 at 9:54 pm

    She told me a little know secret which is that firefighters have been known to start fires because many firefighters only get paid when they are working

    Ah, so you’re telling us that these fires could have been started not by immigrants, but by Latino firefighters?

  27. 27.

    ABL

    June 20, 2011 at 9:54 pm

    Back in his day, McCain wore an onion on his belt… as was the style at the time.

  28. 28.

    Violet

    June 20, 2011 at 9:56 pm

    Maybe McCain needs to invite the firefighters over to enjoy the tire swing and then all will be okay.

  29. 29.

    Comrade Dread

    June 20, 2011 at 9:57 pm

    I knew it was the immigrants. Even when it was the bears, it was the immigrants.

  30. 30.

    jayackroyd

    June 20, 2011 at 10:01 pm

    “I still can not believe that there are people who want to argue that there would have been no difference between the current Obama administration and a McCain/Palin reign of terror”

    Can you link to some of those people, John?

  31. 31.

    Fucen Pneumatic Fuck Wrench Tarmal

    June 20, 2011 at 10:01 pm

    ummm, yeah, despite all the airconditioning, and the trucked in dirt, and the pretense of lawns the rich folk have, arizona is a desert, and all the makings of wildfires are, and have been there.

    interesting how human activity can affect something like this, but not, ah well nevermind.

    perhaps the greater lesson is, that there are too many people in arizona for its climate, and the state has been overbuilt since man has made machines to ameliorate what were once hefty challenges to living year round in such a climate.

  32. 32.

    OzoneR

    June 20, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    I am especially critical of Obama on his economic policy. I don’t see it as betrayal. I think he doesn’t understand it very well, and is confused, and perhaps reluctantly, his on economics have evolved to align with Geithner’s.

    I’m sorry, but I don’t see it as “he doesn’t understand it very well.” I see it as “I did whatever I could realistically do,” and while some may see it as a cop out, that’s life…accomplishing what you can reasonably accomplish.

    this is a country that loses its shit when a Congressman takes a picture of his penis, or a network removes “under God” out of a song that never had it in there in the first place. This is a country that accepts a network pulling out of a President’s speech after a national tragedy to broadcast a fucking football game. This is a country where a major network would rather run a low-rated rerun instead of the President talking about a major overhaul of healthcare.

    In New York State, Democrats are about to trade in rent control and NYC school funding in order to get gay marriage passed, and they’re going to be treated as heroes for it. Gov. Cuomo scored a 75% approval rating for axing public workers, freezing pay and slashing benefits…simply because he did it on time.

    America’s priority is not an economy that works. It’s their own little petty issues of personal importance.

    Democracy is a system designed to exploit human nature (the greed for power) to do good. Politicians will do good if there are enough people demanding it. If that demand is not there, they won’t do it.

    But this requires suspending the naive belief that the country that wants to default on its debt regardless of the damage it’ll do to the economy, secretly also wants a multi-trillion dollar taxpayer funded job program, or that the President 1/3 of them don’t believe was born here, even with evidence, is somehow going to change their mind.

  33. 33.

    Left Coast Tom

    June 20, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    @James E. Powell (Cole, do you ever plan to fix your ‘reply’ button?!):

    No sane person really believes that “Obama is no better than [some Republican].” It is just hyperbole. There are a lot of good reasons to be frustrated with Obama. This is no more than an over-heated way of expressing that frustration.

    I don’t think anyone would disagree with your first sentence, in fact I think that’s pretty much the point. Some of us doubt the sanity of those who claim ‘Obama is no better than [insert moron here]’. The alternative would seem to be believing that those who state such views are consultants and/or fundraisers for [insert moron here].

    Edit: I was about to ask where the Edit button was, but it appeared after about a minute of pondering! Anyway, as a resident of a famously fire-prone state (CA), I think it’s also important to say: “McCain: Fuck You”.

  34. 34.

    lol

    June 20, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    Well… McCain also would have sent troops to Libya, ha!

    “also”? You do realize we don’t have any troops in Libya, right?

  35. 35.

    OzoneR

    June 20, 2011 at 10:04 pm

    She told me a little know secret which is that firefighters have been known to start fires because many firefighters only get paid when they are working.

    they also loot like crazy. In New York, we call them land pirates.

  36. 36.

    OzoneR

    June 20, 2011 at 10:05 pm

    Well… McCain also would have sent troops to Libya, ha!

    Would’ve been fine with that.

  37. 37.

    ppcli

    June 20, 2011 at 10:08 pm

    “On a scale of 1 to 100 percentage points, how much better is the Obama administration than a McCain administration would have been?”

    Hard to give an exact numerical estimate. Let’s just say that it is exactly the same percentage that sex on silk sheets with a young Helen Mirren followed by a double dram of 18-year old Highland Park single malt whiskey would be more desirable than prolonged death by hanging, drawing and quartering.

  38. 38.

    gerry

    June 20, 2011 at 10:12 pm

    Poor John, when will you realize that if you are happy with crappy little differences, that is all you’ll be offered.

  39. 39.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    June 20, 2011 at 10:17 pm

    Poor John, when will you realize that if you are happy with crappy little differences, that is all you’ll be offered.

    The difference between Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, on the one hand, and John Roberts and Samuel Alito on the other, are “crappy little differences”? (Let me once again repeat my thanks to the people who told me there wasn’t a dime’s worth of difference between Gore and Bush)

  40. 40.

    Chukwu

    June 20, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    @baud

    As a brown person, I have to ask:

    How is that progress?

  41. 41.

    asiangrrlMN

    June 20, 2011 at 10:22 pm

    @ppcli, mmmmmm, Helen Mirren.

    Grampy McCain can shut it. Sheesh.

  42. 42.

    Mark S.

    June 20, 2011 at 10:26 pm

    @Violet:

    Maybe McCain needs to invite the firefighters over to enjoy the tire swing and then all will be okay.

    Why does that always sound so much dirtier than it actually is? Even when I’m making the joke I have to remind myself it isn’t something gross like Santorum.

  43. 43.

    James E. Powell

    June 20, 2011 at 10:29 pm

    @Left Coast Tom

    What I am suggesting is that there are people who say “Obama is no better than …” but who do not really mean it, who are just upset, who are exaggerating to make a point, who are not crazy. And I am suggesting that we who do not say such things should not view such statements as an invitation to engage in internecine bickering, but rather to understand that it is just blowing off steam.

  44. 44.

    curious

    June 20, 2011 at 10:30 pm

    boy, there’s just no end to the illegals’ ingenuity.

  45. 45.

    Linda Featheringill

    June 20, 2011 at 10:37 pm

    Uncle #10

    “On a scale of 1 to 100 percentage points, how much better is the Obama administration than a McCain administration would have been?”

    98%. Well, maybe only 96%.

  46. 46.

    Ben

    June 20, 2011 at 10:40 pm

    @Lolis

    “It was a pleasure to burn things…”

  47. 47.

    Linda Featheringill

    June 20, 2011 at 10:42 pm

    Mike M #22

    Immigrants make convenient scapegoats, and I’m sure it was just as true 100 years ago when my ancestors stepped off the boat.

    Using people as scapegoats is an old practice. Nero and the burning of Rome.

    HOWEVER, several cultures have taken the extra steps of punishing these scapegoats. Again, Nero and the burning of Rome.

    [Aren’t you proud of me? I didn’t go Godwin at all. :-)]

  48. 48.

    Mike Kay (Team America)

    June 20, 2011 at 10:45 pm

    THIS IS GREAT NEWS FOR ROMNEY!

  49. 49.

    Mike E

    June 20, 2011 at 10:48 pm

    McCain is just employing the very reasonable Cheney Doctrine of 1% probability=100% wingularity

  50. 50.

    Linda Featheringill

    June 20, 2011 at 10:50 pm

    #40

    Baud, Chukwu has a point and deserves an answer.

    Chukwu, baud might be a self-centered jerk but likely is just a verbally clumsy person. There’s a very good chance that he/she didn’t mean any offense.

  51. 51.

    Keith G

    June 20, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    I still can not believe that there are people who want to argue that there would have been no difference between the current Obama administration and a McCain/Palin reign of terror.

    I am sure that there are such folk, but where is the list?

  52. 52.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    June 20, 2011 at 11:00 pm

    ppcli
    It’s Helen Mirren. Any age between 18 and now is fine with me.

  53. 53.

    Cliff in NH

    June 20, 2011 at 11:01 pm

    100%

    Name one evil thing that Obama did that McCain/Palin would Not have done?

    Sure Obama has done some bad stuff, but what was the alternative?

  54. 54.

    Left Coast Tom

    June 20, 2011 at 11:15 pm

    @James @ 44: We’re supposed to be the ‘reality-based’ folks. I believe that losing grip on reality for the sake of ‘making some point’ is harmful to those of us who share progressive goals.

  55. 55.

    burnspbesq

    June 20, 2011 at 11:20 pm

    @ Uncle Clarence:

    On a scale of 1 to 100 percentage points, how much better is the Obama administration than a McCain administration would have been?

    8,472.

  56. 56.

    Citizen Alan

    June 20, 2011 at 11:23 pm

    For the record, while I have had serious complaints about Obama’s performance (and particularly his decisions to continue some of Bush’s worst policies), I have never thought or suggested that Obama has been remotely as bad as the Lich King of Arizona would be had God been so cruel as to inflict him on our poor nation.

  57. 57.

    Citizen Alan

    June 20, 2011 at 11:26 pm

    That said, would the Lich King of Arizona be doing crap like this if he’d become President? I mean, he knows perfectly well that the GOP’s anti-immigrant bigotry will, over time, be a disaster for the party, and at one point, he supported immigration reform, didn’t he? Is he really an insane bigot or is he just demagoguing the issue because of his insane hatred for Obama?

  58. 58.

    OzoneR

    June 20, 2011 at 11:29 pm

    That said, would the Lich King of Arizona be doing crap like this if he’d become President?

    No, but his party would

  59. 59.

    Berto

    June 20, 2011 at 11:34 pm

    Don’t kid yourself.
    Lucky thing Wall St. loves the cheap labor, lest (How high?) Obama go after the immigrants as well.

  60. 60.

    Left Coast Tom

    June 20, 2011 at 11:37 pm

    @Alan @ 58: You’re writing that question about someone who only took a couple years to make kissy-face with George Bush after the latter spread racist rumors regarding his (the former) daughter for the sake of winning the SC GOP Primary.

  61. 61.

    glitter

    June 20, 2011 at 11:55 pm

    Is he really an insane bigot or is he just demagoguing the issue because of his insane hatred for Obama?

    He is fanning the flames of this and other lizard brain issues to throw up as much smoke as possible and obfuscate the truth. That is the modus operandi of movement conservatism today – because they got nuthin’. Doesn’t matter what they were ‘fer yesterday: if Obama is ‘fer it now they’re agin’ it.

    Had Obama not been elected and the Right not lost their collective minds he may very well have not felt the pressure and been more relatively sensible…of course keeping in mind his giant angry ego.

  62. 62.

    NR

    June 21, 2011 at 12:00 am

    Name one evil thing that Obama did that McCain/Palin would Not have done?

    Forced everyone in America to give money to the same private insurance companies that have been murdering people for profit for years now.

  63. 63.

    Roy G

    June 21, 2011 at 12:00 am

    I heard McCain blamed the fire on the USS Forestal on illegal immigrants too.

  64. 64.

    Mnemosyne

    June 21, 2011 at 12:27 am

    Forced everyone in America to give money to the same private insurance companies that have been murdering people for profit for years now.

    This is true — McCain would have simply adopted the Paul Ryan “here’s a discount coupon” plan and let everyone fend for themselves.

    It’s pretty sick that you think that implementing the Ryan plan and letting people die in droves would have been better than helping people buy health insurance, even from for-profit companies.

  65. 65.

    Mnemosyne

    June 21, 2011 at 12:32 am

    Here’s what what McCain would have implemented had he won: HR 6110

    Yep — we all would have been better off if we had followed the Republican plan and ended CHIP this year instead of expanding coverage to allow people to keep their children on their healthcare plans up to age 26. Right, NR?

  66. 66.

    Cliff in NH

    June 21, 2011 at 12:34 am

    @nr

    Ha, yup, Die quickly … Got evidence for what macain would have tried for health care for all americans?

    keep in mind that the lack of primary care when people are young gets passed on as costs to all americans once they hit 65.

  67. 67.

    Cliff in NH

    June 21, 2011 at 12:40 am

    @NR

    http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/apr2008/db20080429_854428.htm

    Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.), the likely Republican Presidential nominee, stayed true to GOP principles Apr. 29 when he unveiled a health-care reform proposal that leans heavily on competition rather than government intervention. He also wants to see the states take a far greater role in fostering that competition and in forming risk pools that would insure coverage for the sickest citizens.
    __
    The last of the three remaining Presidential candidates to unveil a detailed health proposal, McCain’s is also the least radical. He is against mandates, instead proposing universal coverage would emerge through the use of tax credits and a more competitive insurance marketplace. McCain wants to do away with the tax exemption on employer-provided insurance. Instead, he would give a $2,500 annual tax credit to individuals, and $5,000 to families, to purchase their own coverage.
    __
    McCain’s plan is meant to encourage individuals to purchase their insurance and free companies from the heavy cost of providing coverage. His theory is that employees would take their tax credit and flock to the open market, where they could shop around for the plan that best meets their needs. Insurance companies would have to become more competitive to win their business.

  68. 68.

    Cliff in NH

    June 21, 2011 at 12:49 am

    @Mnemosyne

    Just a quick glance, and as a trader I can say there is some evil shit right up front in that thing…

    13 (5) INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX REFORM.—To
    14 offer taxpayers a choice in paying their Federal in15
    come taxes; to allow individuals to choose between
    16 the current tax code or a highly simplified tax sys17
    tem with virtually no deductions or credits (apart
    18 from an individual health care credit), two low tax
    19 rates and a generous standard deduction and per20
    sonal exemption; to fully repeal the alternative min21
    imum tax (AMT), eliminate the tax on interest, cap22
    ital gains and dividends
    in order to promote saving;
    23 and to repeal the estate tax.

  69. 69.

    trollhattan

    June 21, 2011 at 1:03 am

    Always, always remember: Republicans hate you and no matter how little they leave you with, they’ll try to take that too.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/environment/epa-budget-cuts-put-states-in-bind/2011/06/08/AGbVpYdH_story.html

  70. 70.

    trollhattan

    June 21, 2011 at 1:06 am

    Sen. Jan Brewer has a nice ring to it. Also, too, Sen. Joe Arpaio. Don’t trust Arizona to do the right thing–Janet Napolitano is an outlier.

  71. 71.

    Ed Darrell

    June 21, 2011 at 1:13 am

    . . . your comment does beg the question: “On a scale of 1 to 100 percentage points, how much better is the Obama administration than a McCain administration would have been?”

    On a scale of 1 to 100? About 95 — and it’s that last 5 percent that disappoints the hopeful among us.

    By the way, it doesn’t “beg the question.” “Begging the question” is an argumetative fallacy in which the argument assumes the point it claims to argue for. Say, “It raises the qusetion,” or “This question naturally follows . . .”

  72. 72.

    Cliff in NH

    June 21, 2011 at 1:16 am

    This is Lovely:

    4 ‘‘(d) PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN RECLASSIFICATIONS
    5 AND PREMIUM INCREASES.—
    6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this sec7
    tion, a health insurance issuer that provides indi8
    vidual health insurance coverage to an individual
    9 under this part in a primary or secondary State may
    10 not upon renewal—
    11 ‘‘(A) move or reclassify the individual in12
    sured under the health insurance coverage from
    13 the class such individual is in at the time of
    14 issue of the contract based on the health-status
    15 related factors of the individual; or
    16 ‘‘(B) increase the premiums assessed the
    17 individual for such coverage based on a health
    18 status-related factor or change of a health sta19
    tus-related factor or the past or prospective
    20 claim experience of the insured individual.
    21 ‘‘(2) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in paragraph
    22 (1) shall be construed to prohibit a health insurance
    23 issuer—

    VerDate Aug 31 2005 00:24 May 24, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6110.IH H6110 hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
    38
    •HR 6110 IH
    1 ‘‘(A) from terminating or discontinuing
    2 coverage or a class of coverage in accordance
    3 with subsections (b) and (c) of section 2742;
    4 ‘‘(B) from raising premium rates for all
    5 policy holders within a class based on claims ex6
    perience;
    7 ‘‘(C) from changing premiums or offering
    8 discounted premiums to individuals who engage
    9 in wellness activities at intervals prescribed by
    10 the issuer, if such premium changes or incen11
    tives—
    12 ‘‘(i) are disclosed to the consumer in
    13 the insurance contract;
    14 ‘‘(ii) are based on specific wellness ac15
    tivities that are not applicable to all indi16
    viduals; and
    17 ‘‘(iii) are not obtainable by all individ18
    uals to whom coverage is offered;
    19 ‘‘(D) from reinstating lapsed coverage; or
    20 ‘‘(E) from retroactively adjusting the rates
    21 charged an insured individual if the initial rates
    22 were set based on material misrepresentation by
    23 the individual at the time of issue.

  73. 73.

    NR

    June 21, 2011 at 1:21 am

    It’s pretty sick that you think that implementing the Ryan plan and letting people die in droves would have been better than helping people buy health insurance forcing people to buy worthless junk insurance, even from for-profit companies.

    FIFY.

  74. 74.

    Uncle Clarence Thomas

    June 21, 2011 at 1:39 am

    .
    .
    @71 Ed Darrell

    By the way, it doesn’t “beg the question.” “Begging the question” is an argumetative fallacy in which the argument assumes the point it claims to argue for.

    Au contraire, mon derrière. The phrase has a meaning outside the context of formal logic. I quote Merriam-Webster –

    beg the question
    1 – to pass over or ignore a question by assuming it to be established or settled
    2 – to elicit a question logically as a reaction or response (the quarterback’s injury begs the question of who will start in his place)

    Definition 2 is perfectly valid to use in this case, as I have, and I’ll thank you not to impudently question my use of the English language henceforth. I must say, balloonbaggers are not properly educated, nor good judges of presidents, but they do make fine – though errant – scolds.
    .
    .

  75. 75.

    Cliff in NH

    June 21, 2011 at 1:39 am

    “(C) Special rule for employer-sponsored minimum
    essential coverage.–For purposes of subparagraph (B)–
    “(i) Coverage must be affordable.–Except as
    provided in clause (iii), an employee shall not be
    treated as eligible for minimum essential coverage
    if such coverage–
    “(I) consists of an eligible
    employer-sponsored plan (as defined in
    section 5000A(f)(2)), and
    “(II) the employee’s required
    contribution (within the meaning of
    section 5000A(e)(1)(B)) with

    [[Page 124 STAT. 217]]

    respect to the plan exceeds 9.8 percent
    of the applicable taxpayer’s household
    income.
    <> This clause shall also
    apply to an individual who is eligible to enroll
    in the plan by reason of a relationship the
    individual bears to the employee.
    “(ii) Coverage must provide minimum value.–

  76. 76.

    Uncle Clarence Thomas

    June 21, 2011 at 1:47 am

    .
    .
    @ 56 burnspbesq

    8,472

    How would you rate FDR and any other president(s)?
    .
    .

  77. 77.

    Mnemosyne

    June 21, 2011 at 1:48 am

    It’s pretty sick that you think that implementing the Ryan plan and letting people die in droves would have been better than helping people buy health insurance forcing people to buy worthless junk insurance, even from for-profit companies.

    So we agree that you’re a sick bastard for thinking that McCain’s plan to end employer-based insurance and give families $2,500 apiece to buy insurance from those exact same companies would actually have been an improvement over the cost controls and profit limits in the ACA?

    I guess you just like dead kids more than I do.

  78. 78.

    shano

    June 21, 2011 at 1:52 am

    lolis: that was the case in the last big fire in Az. in the White Mts. & Apache rez. started by a bored firefighter and a weird lost camper signal fire – at the same fucking time! It was a bizarre coincidence. We rescued wild horses from that fire. Many of them were absolutely great horses from army remount Morgan/TB descendants.

    Could McCain pander lower? I do not think so. Pander blowback is a bitch.

  79. 79.

    Cliff in NH

    June 21, 2011 at 2:43 am

    @Cliff in NH

    That is RE: NR @74 from:

    http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/html/PLAW-111publ148.htm

    [111th Congress Public Law 148]
    [From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

    [[Page 124 STAT. 119]]

    Public Law 111-148
    111th Congress

    An Act

    Entitled The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. <>

    Edit: you will find even more relevant sections by searching the word “poverty”

  80. 80.

    Cliff in NH

    June 21, 2011 at 2:52 am

    Find “SEC. 1302. ESSENTIAL”
    in this document:
    http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/html/PLAW-111publ148.htm

    to see what NR calls worthless junk insurance

  81. 81.

    NobodySpecial

    June 21, 2011 at 4:44 am

    People love to derail.

    Obama’s different than McCain, anyone who refuses to admit it is an idiot.

    The difference is, Obama walked into 2008 with a large advantage at the table and refused to push that advantage as far as it could go. His communications team was no good at pushing even something as boilerplate as Democratic Party platforms. His strategy of leaving Congress alone to make legislation allowed his enemies in the party to slow down or subvert the legislation he wanted or claimed he wanted. His insistence on looking like a good guy by talking to Republicans made him hostage to not only the most hostile in his party, but the most hostile in the other party, who think he’s a dirty ni@@er who should be serving dinner to a President instead of sitting in his chair.

    Of course, saying so makes you a lover of ponies, thoroughly unrealistic, a dirty hippie, or whatever Beltway approved insult can be appropriated.

  82. 82.

    DPirate

    June 21, 2011 at 5:51 am

    There is difference. There is not substantial difference.

  83. 83.

    Nemesis

    June 21, 2011 at 8:38 am

    Substantial evidence? Where?

    The media are pathetic. How can such utter nonsense go unquestioned?

    Oh yeah, its the mavericky maverick talkin.

  84. 84.

    Nemesis

    June 21, 2011 at 8:41 am

    Oh, BTW Sister Sarah Paylin is going to run for govenor of the fair state of AZ. Just watch.

  85. 85.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    June 21, 2011 at 8:58 am

    The difference is, Obama walked into 2008 with a large advantage at the table and refused to push that advantage as far as it could go.

    Ah yes, he squandered that crashing economy, passed that totally uncontroverisal 800 billion dollar stiumulus that did nothing, and wasted the powerful position he was in when he had the unflinching and unquestioning support of stalwarts like Evan Bayh, Ben Nelson, Joe Lieberman, Claire McCaskill, Mark Pryor, Blanche Lincoln. Thoughtful, powerful progressive voices like Tom Carper, Jim Webb, Mark Warner, Dianne Feinstein, Max Baucus, Byron Dorgan. And that’s just the Senate! With a bench like that, Obama couldn’t pass single-payer. Obviously, it was a communications problem from the bully pulpit.

  86. 86.

    chopper

    June 21, 2011 at 9:23 am

    @Loneoak:

    fuckin’ math, how does it work?

  87. 87.

    jayackroyd

    June 21, 2011 at 11:30 am

    My friend Stuart Zechman wrote this down, at some length (prolixity is his metier) a few years ago. h

    http://bit.ly/lWumzG

    He thinks, and I have come to agree,that this thing he calls “centrism” and many people call “neo-liberal” is an ideology that is profoundly different from New Deal liberalism-that it is not “moderate” or “pragmatic” liberalism, but an ideology that believes in a collaborative relationship, rather than an adversarial relationship, with large private organizations, and is not committed to New Deal policies of the government providing a pension and health insurance to the middle class.

    Centrists favor things like abolishing Glass-Steagall, replacing Medicare with health insurance exchanges with premium support, cap and trade energy policies. They don’t believe that the public sector can create jobs (Goolsbee: http://bit.ly/mdkPLL)

    This isn’t a position on the spectrum between Goldwater and LBJ. It’s a different way of looking at things from the way either of them view policy–it’s a technocratic, elites run things view of governance.

    And it yields terrible policy, as we are living through.

  88. 88.

    nastybrutishntall

    June 21, 2011 at 12:41 pm

    I agree with Senator Verbnounsecureborder.

    Just this morning, I couldn’t find my keys, probably due to a damned illegal taking them.

    Oops, they were in my pants. My bad.

    But this still argues for a more secure border, because another day it COULD have been an illegal taking them, and then we would all have been less safe.

  89. 89.

    Evolved Deep Southerner

    June 21, 2011 at 1:06 pm

    Mistermix beat you to this one.

    I don’t mind that you all think alike and read the same things – I’d be surprised if you didn’t – but, Lord, it seems like after a while y’all would read each other’s stuff before posting.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Scapegoat season « Millard Fillmore's Bathtub says:
    June 21, 2011 at 1:23 am

    […] John Cole at Balloon Juice: Grampa Simpson at it again: In comments made over the weekend, Senator John McCain R-AZ., blamed illegal immigrants for the some wildfires that have raged across his state of Arizona.“There is substantial evidence that some of these fires have been caused by people who have crossed our border illegally,” McCain said Saturday at a press conference. “The answer to that part of the problem is to get a secure border.”’ […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • like a metaphor on Monday Evening Open Thread: Another ‘Rich’ Narcissist, Having A Bad Start to His Week (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:12pm)
  • citizen dave on Monday Evening Open Thread: Another ‘Rich’ Narcissist, Having A Bad Start to His Week (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:11pm)
  • Adam L Silverman on War for Ukraine Day 782: If the Opposite of Pro Is Con, Then the Opposite of Progress is a GOP Majority in Congress (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:09pm)
  • Comrade Bukharin on War for Ukraine Day 782: If the Opposite of Pro Is Con, Then the Opposite of Progress is a GOP Majority in Congress (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:07pm)
  • Adam L Silverman on War for Ukraine Day 782: If the Opposite of Pro Is Con, Then the Opposite of Progress is a GOP Majority in Congress (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:07pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!