• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

All hail the time of the bunny!

The gop is a fucking disgrace.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

They are not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

“Perhaps I should have considered other options.” (head-desk)

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

President Musk and Trump are both poorly raised, coddled 8 year old boys.

After dobbs, women are no longer free.

The arc of the moral universe does not bend itself. it is up to us to bend it.

Everybody saw this coming.

It’s a good piece. click on over. but then come back!!

Just because you believe it, that does not make it true.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

We will not go back.

We still have time to mess this up!

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Economics / Show Us on the Doll Where the Invisible Hand Touched You / Hedge Fund Regulations

Hedge Fund Regulations

by John Cole|  June 22, 20113:14 pm| 33 Comments

This post is in: Show Us on the Doll Where the Invisible Hand Touched You

FacebookTweetEmail

This seems like good news:

A divided Securities and Exchange Commission approved new rules on Wednesday that would impose sweeping requirements on large hedge funds and other private investment advisers, a first for an industry that has long eluded Washington oversight.

Venture capital funds and some small hedge funds are excused from the rules, although these firms will still have to report some basic information to regulators.

The rules will require hedge funds, private equity shops and other advisers that mange more than $150 million to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission and turn over an array of crucial information. The funds will disclose details about the inner workings of their firms, the funds they oversee and their investors.

“Today’s rules will fee a key gap in the regulatory landscape,” Mary Schapiro, the agency’s chairwoman, said at a public meeting in Washington. “In particular, our proposal will give the commission, and the public, insight into hedge fund and other private fund managers who previously conducted their work under the radar and outside the vision of regulators.”

But for now, the new oversight regime is on hold. Regulators agreed to delay the start date of the rules until March 30, 2012, a nearly nine month reprieve.

Why was this never done before?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Fuck You America
Next Post: Being a Xenophobic Bigot Has Costs »

Reader Interactions

33Comments

  1. 1.

    Maude

    June 22, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    Wasn’t done because: Reagan, Bush Clinton, Bush.

  2. 2.

    trollhattan

    June 22, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    This was a provision of Dodd-Frank, yes? Why was it not already in place, I wonder?

    If somebody can ‘splain how John Paulson can make in a year more than many nations’ GDPs yet pay a lower tax rate than I, that would be nice.

  3. 3.

    PurpleGirl

    June 22, 2011 at 3:23 pm

    Ask Chuck Schumer… he has lots of hedge fund manager friends.

    BTW: I’m assuming you just did a copy and paste from the NYT. Bad on them for two typos in those paragraphs: mange and fee. I think they meant: manage and fill. Argh.

  4. 4.

    Han's Solo

    June 22, 2011 at 3:23 pm

    My understanding is that it was not done before because the whole point of a hedge fund is that there are so few regulations. That is one of the big differences between a hedge fund and a mutual fund.

    Another difference: not everyone can invest in a hedge fund. You need to have a net worth above a certain threshold, or income above a certain threshold, or have an in (be an employee) with the hedge fund.

  5. 5.

    cleek

    June 22, 2011 at 3:26 pm

    not a dime’s worth of difference!

  6. 6.

    Maude

    June 22, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    Purple Girl

    I like mange and fee better. Kind of livens up the article.

  7. 7.

    Ochotona princeps

    June 22, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    It wasn’t done before because ‘hedge funds’ typically aren’t open to the public. In order to invest in one you have to be an “accredited investor” with either $1M net worth or 200k in income for the last several years.

    The idea is that investment regs are there to protect the average Joe. People are (theoretically) sophisticated, or can afford to lose lots of money, can invest in whatever cockamamie scheme they want to.

    I actually somewhat disagree with the new rules. The SEC has enough to do without looking out for the interests of the rich–if your doctor or broker or whatever wants to lose all his money to the next Madoff, let him.

  8. 8.

    PurpleGirl

    June 22, 2011 at 3:31 pm

    Maude: LOL.

  9. 9.

    Mothra

    June 22, 2011 at 3:31 pm

    Not a dime’s worth, billions of dollars worth. There are billions of dollars worth of difference between the two parties. That kind of rhetoric is just another form of voter suppression, and it’s on the cheap.

    John, do you listen to Glenn Beck at all? He is ranting routinely about the way that Obama uses regulatory agencies, an he claims that they are unconstitutional. It’s another tactic that they use to keep me “free” by poisoning me and creating conditions where I will have to work until the day that I lay down on the job and die.

    Nobody better tell me that there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference. I just can’t take that bullshit anymore.

  10. 10.

    Timothy Trollenschlongen (formerly Tim, Interrupted)

    June 22, 2011 at 3:33 pm

    John, you asked:

    Why was this never done before?

    I ask: Why has it still not been done?

    But for now, the new oversight regime is on hold. Regulators agreed to delay the start date of the rules until March 30, 2012, a nearly nine month reprieve.

    Why do so many Obama administration actions, seemingly positive, come with delays, reprieves, qualifiers, exemptions, etc. that minimize and postpone their seeming effectiveness? The ridiculous “certification” step in repealing DADT, for instance.

    For the reflexive Obot screechers, don’t bother. I’m asking a real question here. I’d like a coherent answer. Thanks.

  11. 11.

    Mike Goetz

    June 22, 2011 at 3:36 pm

    Hedge funds haven’t been as heavily regulated because typically they have a small number (to qualify as a hedge fund, you can’t have more than 20 or so participants) of very rich investors, who were thought to be able to fend for themselves. This really should have been done after LTCM went tits up, when it was discovered that hedge funds can blow up the entire economy.

    The extra regulation is good, reforming how they are taxed would be even better.

  12. 12.

    Mike Goetz

    June 22, 2011 at 3:38 pm

    Mothra,

    I do believe cleek was serving up some snark, extra dry.

  13. 13.

    Mothra

    June 22, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    Thank you for the heads up, Mike. I’m sorry, cleek.

    I’m on edge today, for personal reasons, the news just doesn’t make me feel any better. We cannot keep having these financial disasters. Our peril is being misrepresented to the public. I feel at wit’s end.

  14. 14.

    Pliny

    June 22, 2011 at 3:43 pm

    @2 trollhattan

    Another sweet provision of Dodd-Frank was for the CFTC to reinstate position limits for commodity speculation (which they had quietly removed for sixteen firms, allowing them to flood the commodities market with free money from the Fed). They were ordered to do this by January, and still haven’t. Bernie Sanders is pretty pissed about this

  15. 15.

    Martin

    June 22, 2011 at 3:43 pm

    Why was this never done before?

    I don’t think it was needed before, to be honest. Hedge funds were unregulated funds open to only the super-rich who could afford to lose everything. 10 years ago, there simply wasn’t enough money tied up in those individuals, and therefore in the hedge funds to wreak financial armageddon on the nation – $320B in assets in 2000. That’s small change to the nations economy, but by 2008 that was up to just about $2T, and that’s no longer the depositors getting fucked but everyone else if it collapses.

    Now, why it wasn’t done after Sept 2008 is a perfectly valid question. My feeling about why this stuff has been so slow in coming is because it could. There has been a LOT of scrutiny paid inside and out of Wall Street over the last 2 years and while that’s going on, you have sort of an unofficial regulation taking place. As attention shifts away, that’s when the formal regulation is needed, and a bit of time helps everyone determine what kind of regulation is really needed (as we’re still learning new things about what’s going on). In the immediate aftermath of 9/08, I think we would have gotten the regulation quite a bit wrong, regulating the most visible culprits, not the most powerful. Plus I imagine this decision was quite difficult to win.

  16. 16.

    giltay

    June 22, 2011 at 3:55 pm

    Mothra: I agree with Mike Goetz that I think cleek was being sarcastic, but yours was a quality comment.

  17. 17.

    LGRooney

    June 22, 2011 at 3:55 pm

    How long before the hedge funds re-title themselves as something else, claim the regulations no longer apply to them, and the courts agree that the law never stated that “alternative risk-management pools” were not explicitly stated in the regulations therefore they are free to do whatever they want?

  18. 18.

    Linda Featheringill

    June 22, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    Mothra #11.

    I’m having a rough day, too. Doing the best that I can but it’s just not good enough. Hate days like that.

    $%^))(*)*&$$$!

    [Hang in there. :-)]

    Edited for clarity [See? I can’t even do this with style and grace.]

  19. 19.

    Linkmeister

    June 22, 2011 at 4:01 pm

    Brooksley Born tried to get derivatives regulated, but she was overruled/outvoted. Since those are used by the hedgers, that would have helped.

  20. 20.

    Pliny

    June 22, 2011 at 4:02 pm

    @15 LGRooney:

    Why would they need to do that? It’s much easier to just give Chuck Schumer a pile of money and have him push an amendment or two. See: Carried Interest (in which hedge fund managers and other various hyper-rich pay only 15% capital gains on all the money they make)

  21. 21.

    Mothra

    June 22, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    Thank you, Giltay and Linda,

    The flaws in unregulated capitalism are becoming as clear as the flaws in communism. Yes, Rooney, they will reinvent themselves. We have a chance only as long as we keep regulating them, investigating them, and sending the worst offenders to jail.

  22. 22.

    kindness

    June 22, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    This will make the Gaultians cry.

    Bobo will certainly piss and moan a column out of it.

  23. 23.

    catclub

    June 22, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    I liked “mange more than $150 million”

    reminds me of scrofula.

  24. 24.

    catclub

    June 22, 2011 at 4:17 pm

    Martin @ 13: wasn’t LTCM in 1998 big enough to do very bad things if it collapsed – hence it was not allowed to collapse?

    Wasn’t LTCM an unregulated hedge fund?

  25. 25.

    JPL

    June 22, 2011 at 4:32 pm

    When’s the birthday party begin for John. I suggest we post youtube videos singing happy birthday..

  26. 26.

    burnspbesq

    June 22, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    @ (There are those who call me) Tim:

    Why do so many Obama administration actions, seemingly positive, come with delays, reprieves, qualifiers, exemptions, etc. that minimize and postpone their seeming effectiveness?

    In this case, because it takes time, for both the SEC and the newly regulated firms, to build a reporting and disclosure apparatus that has never existed before. Anyone who has lived through the process of taking a company public gets this. The data have never been collected in this way before, and may never have been collected at all. Documents have to be drafted from scratch, and lawyers will go back and forth for weeks over seemingly trivial word choices. Etc., etc. Not a completely fair comparison, but could you write a 100 page paper on a subject that you know nothing about by this time next Monday?

  27. 27.

    burnspbesq

    June 22, 2011 at 4:50 pm

    @ catclub:

    is that the skin condition, or the third-person-singular form of the French verb? Either would be somewhat appropriate, but clarity is always helpful.

  28. 28.

    gogol's wife

    June 22, 2011 at 4:52 pm

    Why do some people seem to have reply buttons and I don’t? Are they using that incredibly complicated process that somebody explained?

  29. 29.

    burnspbesq

    June 22, 2011 at 4:55 pm

    Can I just say that the second link up from the bottom of this page on the SEC website really pisses me off? Fucking Republicans.

    http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/dodd-frank.shtml

  30. 30.

    Basilisc

    June 22, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    Actually the SEC tried to, back in 2004, but it got overturned in court two years later and the agency gave up. See this article, about halfway down (under “US regulation”).

    This is part of a broader pattern, of course – pre-crisis, regulators had all sorts of ideas for putting fairly mild controls on risk-taking, requiring fairly mild forms of disclosure, etc, but inevitably “the industry” cracked the whip, Congressmen jumped, political appointees cowered, and nothing got done. And when it all blew up people blamed the regulators.

  31. 31.

    kindness

    June 22, 2011 at 5:14 pm

    gogol’s wife@28

    None of us have the Reply button any more. What we do is hit the link on the comment, copy the web address, in the posting box at the bottom hit the link button, copy web address into link address & then enter who it was we were replying to.

    We’re replying longhand. Might as well be programming in cobol.

  32. 32.

    Roger Moore

    June 22, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    @Ochotona princeps:

    The idea is that investment regs are there to protect the average Joe.

    They’re also there to prevent systemic risks to the financial system. Since hedge funds have proven themselves capable of creating systemic risk, it makes sense to regulate them.

  33. 33.

    Ochotona princeps

    June 22, 2011 at 6:49 pm

    Did they? My understanding was that the worst of the damage was caused by investment banks’ proprietary trading–i.e., the stuff Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers et al. were doing on their own. Plus some help from AIG and associated bit players.

    Keep in mind that hedge funds don’t create financial products (like mortgage-backed securities) like the banksters do, they just trade. There’s no substantive difference between a $500M hedge fund and a guy with $500M day trading from his basement.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - way2blue - SINALEI, SAMOA—RESPITE EDITION—FEBRUARY 2025.  (second of five) 7
Image by way2blue (7/13/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • TONYG on Government-Sanctioned Manslaughter by the Trump Crime Cartel (Jul 13, 2025 @ 4:22pm)
  • raven on Government-Sanctioned Manslaughter by the Trump Crime Cartel (Jul 13, 2025 @ 4:20pm)
  • WaterGirl on Darkness Has a Hunger That’s Insatiable and Lightness Has a Call That’s Hard To Hear (Jul 13, 2025 @ 4:19pm)
  • sab on Government-Sanctioned Manslaughter by the Trump Crime Cartel (Jul 13, 2025 @ 4:17pm)
  • prostratedragon on Government-Sanctioned Manslaughter by the Trump Crime Cartel (Jul 13, 2025 @ 4:16pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!