• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Jack be nimble, jack be quick, hurry up and indict this prick.

with the Kraken taking a plea, the Cheese stands alone.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

Be a traveling stable for those who can’t find room at the inn.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Let there be snark.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

It’s not hopeless, and we’re not helpless.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

DeSantis transforming Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

We know you aren’t a Democrat but since you seem confused let me help you.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Republicans don’t lie to be believed, they lie to be repeated.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

The arc of the moral universe doesn’t bend itself. it’s up to us.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

You come for women, you’re gonna get your ass kicked.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

“The defense has a certain level of trust in defendant that the government does not.”

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Crazification Factor / Maybe if we made a video…

Maybe if we made a video…

by Kay|  July 12, 20117:22 pm| 15 Comments

This post is in: Crazification Factor, Election 2011, Election 2012, Fuck The Poor, Republican Venality, Blatant Liars and the Lies They Tell, Teabagger Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Just finished a conference call with voting supporters from all over Ohio. On the call were reps from the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), Jobs with Justice, The Urban League, Interfaith Worker Justice, College Democrats from Ohio University and Ohio State, Ohio AFL-CIO, ARC, an Ohio State professor, three volunteer voter protection lawyers, a rep from the Leadership Council and some others.

This is the second voter ID law conservatives in Ohio have passed. The first, in 2005/6, apparently didn’t get the job done, so they’re back for Round Two. No one knows what the first law was supposed to accomplish, and so consequently no one knows why we need a second, still-more restrictive law. We’ll never know because no one in media ever asks conservatives that question. I’m sure the answer is “ACORN” or “The New Black Panther Party” because when conservatives utter either of those words or phrases, media seem to lose all interest in the nuts and bolts of actual voters and voting. The voting process is (in reality) dry and rule-bound and ordinary, so maybe that’s it. Much more fun to gape at doctored video again and again than talk about the basic foundation of democracy, I’m sure.

This latest Ohio voter ID law met some unexpected (and frankly, fun to watch) resistance from the newly elected GOP Secretary of State. He opposes the law, because he (rightly) concludes it will inevitably wrongly disenfranchise lawful voters.

“I believe that if you have a government-issued check, a utility bill in your name with your address on it, that no one made that up,” Husted said to reporters following his speech during League of Women Voters of Ohio’s annual Statehouse Day. “They didn’t call AEP and establish utilities in their name to commit voter fraud.”

Of course they didn’t. That’s crazy.

Anyway, the bill was held up for a while, and now there is apparently discussion on some hurry-up changes to the most egregious portions. The law isn’t set in stone, so we are unable to plan voter education efforts just yet. Hopefully conservatives in the Ohio legislature will find time between the many, many hours they spend loudly showboating on abortion to finally complete the new restrictive rules they demand so voters and others have time to learn the new restrictive rules they demand.

My take on the conference call was that the college students were the most alarmed. They will be a particular area of concentration for voting rights advocates and others who value the right to vote.

When the final law goes in I’ll let you know what approaches we’re using to help make sure that each and every registered, eligible voter gets a first class ballot that is counted.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « All over the map
Next Post: Tuesday Evening Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

15Comments

  1. 1.

    Mr Stagger Lee

    July 12, 2011 at 7:42 pm

    Does any of these laws violate the Voting Rights Act of 1964?
    Also will the NAACP legal defense team(as well as other progressive law groups) will be quick to go after those who try to challenge the right of people to vote

  2. 2.

    PeakVT

    July 12, 2011 at 7:43 pm

    Maybe if you re-posted this in an hour… :)

  3. 3.

    arguingwithsignposts

    July 12, 2011 at 7:49 pm

    Kay,

    I’m with peakvt here. Lots of thread-stomping atm. You folks should really learn to schedule posts so they don’t tumble by so quickly.

  4. 4.

    Zach

    July 12, 2011 at 7:51 pm

    I don’t understand why Democrats don’t just one up Republicans on election fraud: “If the GOP really cared about election fraud, they’d sign onto our bill that says every voter in every American election has their finger died red, white, or blue (their choice!) to prevent any fraudulent voting.”

    Done. I can’t think of a single way to steal an election at the polls that the GOP bills purport to stop that doesn’t involve multiple voting. I suppose you could somehow illegally register voters or fabricate voters on the registration list and pay illegal immigrants, felons, and non-citizens to vote, but they could still only vote once.

  5. 5.

    Ecks

    July 12, 2011 at 7:53 pm

    Someone should be collecting the stories of really charismatic and/orsympathetic (that part shouldn’t matter, but the media won’t pay any attention without it) people who get denied the chance to vote because of these walls of red tape that are being erected, and start putting these narratives out into the media.

    The story has to become that the republicans have become the party of unchaining big companies from any kind of restraint, while entangling regular Americans in layers of impenetrable requirements. Got to have the right kind of ID, got to go to the right place, the people at the wrong places won’t tell you where the right places are, etc.

    It’s kind of a hard sell because the people who do have drivers licences just assume by default that all real americans have them, and that you must be some kind of lazy freak not to have one… SO that makes them naturally unsympathetic to those who don’t. How to break down that wall?

  6. 6.

    arguingwithsignposts

    July 12, 2011 at 8:02 pm

    Btw, am i the only one who thinks there should be some sort of national minimum standard for voting rights qualification laws (beyond the voting rights act)? Someone explain why this wouldn’t be a good idea beyond state’s rights bullshit?

  7. 7.

    JPL

    July 12, 2011 at 8:06 pm

    arguingwithsignposts, I would prefer that the current House of Representatives not consider this.

  8. 8.

    Bill Murray

    July 12, 2011 at 8:09 pm

    No one knows what the first law was supposed to accomplish, and so consequently no one knows why we need a second, still-more restrictive law.

    you mean the laws aren’t aimed at keeping the elderly, poor and students from voting, and the first one did not do a good enough job?

  9. 9.

    arguingwithsignposts

    July 12, 2011 at 8:11 pm

    @JPL: i do agree with you on timing, but on general principle, it seems like a no-brainer.

  10. 10.

    Ben Vernia

    July 12, 2011 at 8:19 pm

    When I worked on voter protection issues for the Obama campaign in Ohio in 2008, one of the big issues was Ohio’s poorly worded voter ID law.

    The law endorsed various forms of ID, including documents from state agencies with the would-be voter’s name and address, as well as utility bills.

    For college students, this meant that you could use a tuition statement, if you attended a state-run school. If you went to a private college, there was pretty much no way you would typically have the right papers if you were originally from out of state, even if you liked Ohio and wanted to stay there forever.

    The workaround that the Democratic SOS endorsed was a “zero-balance utility bill.” The college could send you a letter with your name and address on it, along with a statement that, as a student at the school, it provided you with utility services (water, electricity, internet, etc.) for which your amount due was $0.

    The trick was convincing colleges to do this, for a variety of reasons. Some didn’t want their students to be involved in local politics for town/gown reasons, others thought there must be something illicit about a zero-balance utility bill, and others just didn’t want to be bothered.

    Nevertheless, after a lot of patient work, we got a great many private schools on board. But the whole thing was a great big kludge to get around the lousy wording of the voter ID bill.

    Then there were the fights to convince county boards of elections to accept the letters…

  11. 11.

    MAC

    July 12, 2011 at 9:00 pm

    I remember reading something in a Cleveland Plain Dealer article quoting a Republican senator about why the bill was needed. And I remember it because it was absurd.

    He said something along the lines that he believed voter fraud was a very big problem, but he couldn’t prove it because he couldn’t prove a negative. The very fact that there was no proof of voter fraud was his way of justifying a bill to (supposedly) prevent voter fraud.

  12. 12.

    sturunner

    July 12, 2011 at 9:54 pm

    Can we also get this also POS on the 11/11 referendum ballot?

  13. 13.

    iriedc

    July 13, 2011 at 12:04 am

    Crucial work, Kay. Thanks for doing it.

  14. 14.

    kay

    July 13, 2011 at 7:59 am

    Ben Vernia – When I worked on voter protection issues for the Obama campaign in Ohio in 2008, one of the big issues was Ohio’s poorly worded voter ID law.

    I followed the first ID bill closely, and the “government document” exception you’re talking about was an attempt by liberals and Democrats to leave an opening for poor people to vote. What conservatives do is shut doors on voting. They close down voter options. Any opening is prized, because we can get valid voters past the hurdles they set up :)

    Democrats and liberals had some success just continuing to water down the bill once the GOP declared victory on what was essentially the first draft and wandered off to their next Fox interview. That the “government document” provision they deliberately drafted broad was used by students is telling all by itself, and an indication that the opening was needed for more than just poor people, so thanks for mentioning it.

    In any event, the current version of the law closes that door. It’s a game to them. They close a door, and we find a window. It sucks, but that’s the truth.

  15. 15.

    kay

    July 13, 2011 at 8:22 am

    MAC – I remember reading something in a Cleveland Plain Dealer article quoting a Republican senator about why the bill was needed. And I remember it because it was absurd.

    It is absurd, which is why I’m obsessed with it, I think. Stupid shit that doesn’t make sense shouldn’t win. I’m bitter. I’m not asking for that much. I’m asking media to understand the basic voting process, and use their own common sense when looking at these laws. They don’t have to know the case law or history even read the statute. They just have to think it through, all by themselves, and ask three questions. It would take them twenty minutes to figure it out, and they’re paid to think.

    I’m serious about the video. The LULAC women was a very effective speaker, and she has a compelling and heartwarming story about brand-new citizens and voting. Liberals are supposed to be creative in the arts and such. Why don’t we ever use that advantage? I’m not creative, but people are. Where are they?

    Clearly, I’m extremely bitter and shrill :)

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Another Scott on War for Ukraine Day 782: If the Opposite of Pro Is Con, Then the Opposite of Progress is a GOP Majority in Congress (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:24pm)
  • NotMax on Monday Evening Open Thread: Another ‘Rich’ Narcissist, Having A Bad Start to His Week (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:24pm)
  • Dagaetch on War for Ukraine Day 782: If the Opposite of Pro Is Con, Then the Opposite of Progress is a GOP Majority in Congress (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:24pm)
  • Urza on War for Ukraine Day 782: If the Opposite of Pro Is Con, Then the Opposite of Progress is a GOP Majority in Congress (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:21pm)
  • Timill on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:20pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!