• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

We’re watching the self-immolation of the leading world power on a level unprecedented in human history.

“The defense has a certain level of trust in defendant that the government does not.”

We know you aren’t a Democrat but since you seem confused let me help you.

They punch you in the face and then start crying because their fist hurts.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

“Perhaps I should have considered other options.” (head-desk)

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Republicans in disarray!

Fundamental belief of white supremacy: white people are presumed innocent, minorities are presumed guilty.

“But what about the lurkers?”

My right to basic bodily autonomy is not on the table. that’s the new deal.

Giving up is unforgivable.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

The unpunished coup was a training exercise.

Marge, god is saying you’re stupid.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

Not all heroes wear capes.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Some Should-be Front Page News

Some Should-be Front Page News

by @heymistermix.com|  July 13, 20119:19 am| 37 Comments

This post is in: Our Failed Media Experiment, Our Failed Political Establishment

FacebookTweetEmail

Somehow the beltway media missed this in the discussion of the debt ceiling, but right now, the real rate of return on government debt is negative (via):

Suppose the government had two choices. It could either pay for infrastructure improvements as it went along out of tax revenue or it could borrow money build the infrastructure now and then repay the money with tax revenues.

Ordinarily the question would be, does the advantage of building quickly outweigh the cost of the interest.

However, right now the interest cost is negative. The government saves money by borrowing now rather than waiting and paying cash. Let me say again because I have noticed that this goes against so much intuition that its hard for many people to wrap around when I first say it.

The government will wind up paying more if it decides to pay cash for a project than it will if it decides to borrow. This is irrespective of the return on the project itself or the advantages of avoiding delays or anything like that. It is simply that the cost of borrowing is negative.

It is cheaper than paying cash.

Speaking of borrowing, one of our big creditors thinks we might want to pare back our military spending (via):

The chief of the General Staff of the People’s Liberation Army, Chen Bingde, told reporters he thought the U.S. should cut back on defense spending for the sake of its taxpayers. He was speaking during a joint news conference in which he traded barbs with visiting U.S. counterpart Adm. Mike Mullen.

“I know the U.S. is still recovering from the financial crisis,” Chen said. “Under such circumstances, it is still spending a lot of money on its military and isn’t that placing too much pressure on the taxpayers?

“If the U.S. could reduce its military spending a bit and spend more on improving the livelihood of the American people … wouldn’t that be a better scenario?” he said.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Quick bleg
Next Post: Peace Out »

Reader Interactions

37Comments

  1. 1.

    MikeJ

    July 13, 2011 at 9:21 am

    The chief of the General Staff of the People’s Liberation Army, Chen Bingde, told reporters he thought the U.S. should cut back on defense spending for the sake of its taxpayers.

    That’s the dumbest messenger in the world for that message.

  2. 2.

    Ben Cisco

    July 13, 2011 at 9:25 am

    He knew what he was doing.
    __
    Cue GOPer freakout, Beltway BS, and NO ACTION TAKEN.
    __
    QED.

  3. 3.

    ...now I try to be amused

    July 13, 2011 at 9:29 am

    What times are these, when even senior Chinese generals are concern-trolling.

  4. 4.

    EconWatcher

    July 13, 2011 at 9:29 am

    I’m getting the feeling they don’t take us very seriously any more. They enjoy tweaking us, and don’t much care how we feel about it.

  5. 5.

    overeducated

    July 13, 2011 at 9:29 am

    Yeah that’s a pretty obvious tell that the Chinese would like nothing better for us to continue to crash our economy by spending ludicrous amounts on military spending.

  6. 6.

    Han's Solo

    July 13, 2011 at 9:33 am

    Will of course doing the infrastructure now makes sense. It would help the economy greatly and be a boon for decades to come.

    Why do you think the GOP opposes it? They have a vested interest in keeping our economy shitty through 2012.

  7. 7.

    Stefan

    July 13, 2011 at 9:33 am

    The chief of the General Staff of the People’s Liberation Army, Chen Bingde, told reporters he thought the U.S. should cut back on defense spending for the sake of its taxpayers.

    Damn it, now we’ll never be able to cut back, because if we do half the country will freak out that we’re falling into a Chinese trap.

    Wily, these Orientals.

  8. 8.

    Stefan

    July 13, 2011 at 9:34 am

    Concern Chinese general is concerned.

  9. 9.

    Agoraphobic Kleptomaniac

    July 13, 2011 at 9:34 am

    Srsly. China, you’re not helping.

  10. 10.

    Dave

    July 13, 2011 at 9:35 am

    It is cheaper than paying cash.

    I’ve seen this elsewhere. The Economist had a similar piece, pointing out that the US should be borrowing what is essentially free money to shore up and jump start the economy, because the resultant tax revenues will more than cover the money borrowed.

  11. 11.

    4tehlulz

    July 13, 2011 at 9:35 am

    China’s first troll.

  12. 12.

    arguingwithsignposts

    July 13, 2011 at 9:35 am

    Breaking: murdochs bskyb bid officially dead.

  13. 13.

    dan

    July 13, 2011 at 9:36 am

    7.Stefan – they are not “Orientals.” They are Chinamen.

  14. 14.

    The Moar You Know

    July 13, 2011 at 9:38 am

    “If the U.S. could reduce its military spending a bit and spend more on improving the livelihood of the American people … wouldn’t that be a better scenario?” he said.

    Fucking asshole. He knows damn well by saying this publicly, he has just insured that such a course of action will never happen.

    Well played, General Bingde.

  15. 15.

    Chris

    July 13, 2011 at 9:39 am

    That’s the dumbest messenger in the world for that message.

    Yeah, it just proves that the man’s a communist who believes in welfare and dependency, and AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM(TM) means that we shouldn’t spend one bloody cent on that welfare! (Please ignore the farm subsidies, highway subsidies and other multiple subsidies to Middle America which we have no intention of ending. That’s not socialism. Because. Shut up. That’s why. Shut the fuck up!)

    I realize the ChiComs have ulterior motives and all, but it’s still a hell of a thing when a general of the God damn PLA can say something that’s both better economics and more compassionate than most of the Beltway.

  16. 16.

    someguy

    July 13, 2011 at 9:39 am

    Shit, we should pump up the inflation rate to 20%, because then the government will actually be turning a profit on the national debt, borrowing in today’s dollars and paying back heavily inflated (i.e. more worthless dollars) a few years down the road.

    I don’t know why we didn’t think of that sooner. It could be a road to incredible prosperity.

  17. 17.

    Chris

    July 13, 2011 at 9:40 am

    That’s the dumbest messenger in the world for that message.

    Yeah, it just proves that the man’s a communist who believes in welfare and dependency, and AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM means that we shouldn’t spend one bloody cent on that welfare! (Please ignore the farm subsidies, highway subsidies and other multiple subsidies to Middle America which we have no intention of ending. That’s not soçialism. Because. Shut up. That’s why. Shut the fuck up!)

    I realize the ChiComs have ulterior motives and all, but it’s still a hell of a thing when a general of the God damn PLA can say something that’s both better economics and more compassionate than most of the Beltway.

  18. 18.

    Chris

    July 13, 2011 at 9:41 am

    @ dan,

    7.Stefan – they are not “Orientals.” They are Chinamen.

    Danny, you’re out of your element!

    The Chinaman is not the issue here, Dude.

  19. 19.

    Dave

    July 13, 2011 at 9:41 am

    @ 11 – 4tehlulz:

    China’s first troll.

    Here’s one product I don’t mind outsourcing to the Chinese. Can we pack up Bobo and Friedman today?

  20. 20.

    Chris

    July 13, 2011 at 9:42 am

    Oh, and folks, it’s okay – I seriously doubt if anyone in America will even register the general’s comment.

  21. 21.

    liberal

    July 13, 2011 at 9:42 am

    @15 someguy:

    Shit, we should pump up the inflation rate to 20%, because …

    I’m not sure if we need to go to 20%, but I think a better reason is that inflation would help eat away a lot of the debt overhang in the non-gov’t sector.

    As a big net saver, I’m not personally thrilled about that course. OTOH, my impression is that economic history says it might be necessary medicine (given that outright debt forgiveness ain’t about to happen).

  22. 22.

    Dave

    July 13, 2011 at 9:46 am

    @15 – someguy

    we should pump up the inflation rate to 20%

    Except then you are crashing the economy as the housing market completely collapses and household debt payments go through the roof due to credit card rates skyrocketing. The consumer sector of the economy would grind to a halt.

  23. 23.

    handsmile

    July 13, 2011 at 9:50 am

    More effectively than a squadron of Northrup Grumman or General Dynamics lobbyists, that Chinese military chief neatly scuppered any possibility of a significant reduction in the Pentagon’s budget. Well played, sir. Eleventh-dimensional chess is not only a White House sport I see.

    Plunk down that yuan for Berlitz or RosettaStone tapes on Mandarin, my friends. It’s gonna be increasingly handy.

  24. 24.

    Ivan Ivanovich Renko

    July 13, 2011 at 9:51 am

    He knows damn well by saying this publicly, he has just insured that such a course of action will never happen.

    And…

    I’m getting the feeling they don’t take us very seriously any more. They enjoy tweaking us, and don’t much care how we feel about it.

    Why should anyone take us seriously when we’re so motherfucking STUPID that something eminently sensible coming from the wrong mouth ensures that it will never happen.?

  25. 25.

    Agoraphobic Kleptomaniac

    July 13, 2011 at 9:57 am

    @Chris: Right, most Americans won’t hear it, but Talk Radio will reference it indirectly and Very.Serious.People will mention how there’s that Chinese General guy who wants us to stop military spending (*red alert red alert red alert*) so it must be some sort of trap.

    This is the game.

  26. 26.

    ppcli

    July 13, 2011 at 9:59 am

    Yeah that’s a pretty obvious tell that the Chinese would like nothing better for us to continue to crash our economy by spending ludicrous amounts on military spending.

    The real giveaway was when the Chinese general continued “Mister Obama: Tear down this wall!”

  27. 27.

    Suffern ACE

    July 13, 2011 at 10:10 am

    It is so easy being a general. Worried that your adversary might have to cut his military spending, thereby eventually creating pressure on you to cut your own spending? Rattle a saber or pull this…problem solved. Lockheed couldn’t have paid him enough…

  28. 28.

    Ken

    July 13, 2011 at 10:25 am

    The right likes what the Chinese are doing. No less a figure than Noted Intellectual Statesman Newt Gingrich has often said they have no capital gains tax, as an argument for eliminating the US tax. Others have pointed to their business-friendly (lack of) environmental and worker-safety regulations.

  29. 29.

    Chris

    July 13, 2011 at 10:27 am

    @ Suffern ACE,

    It is so easy being a general. Worried that your adversary might have to cut his military spending, thereby eventually creating pressure on you to cut your own spending? Rattle a saber or pull this…problem solved. Lockheed couldn’t have paid him enough…

    It just occurred to me that the guy’s doing exactly what wingnuts claim Reagan did during the Cold War – provoke the Main Enemy into increasing military spending when you know it’s unsustainable and it’ll break his economy.

    Now that’s some irony right there. Lenin must be laughing in his grave.

  30. 30.

    Chris

    July 13, 2011 at 10:34 am

    Others have pointed to their business-friendly (lack of) environmental and worker-safety regulations.

    I’d also point to the lack of freedom of speech, which prevents employees from voicing their grievances; the lack of freedom of assembly, which prevents employees from forming an association that could agitate for those grievances; the lack of free press, which prevents awareness of their point of view from spreading; the lack of free elections, which prevents people from voting in a government more sympathetic to their concerns.

    In other words, the lack of all the things that originally made the U.S. “exceptional.”

    Let’s face it: big business loves itself some dictatorship. MUCH easier to deal with employee troubles when they don’t have a government to speak for them. Maybe more trouble over the long run, but hey, that’s the long run; the company’s bosses will probably be gone long before that.

  31. 31.

    Judas Escargot

    July 13, 2011 at 10:36 am

    As a big net saver, I’m not personally thrilled about that [inflation] course.

    Real (ie wage-driven) inflation would give non-millionaire savers access to higher interest rates (remember the days of 8-12pc CDs?). And there’s always I-Bonds.

    Never, ever trust a rich man who tells you we need 2% inflation forever, and an Au-backed currency. That’s wealthy-speak for “Let me cash in all my chips now, then we’ll end the game before you can catch up.”

    [eta: was it the link to ibonds info that put my comment in moderation? or the fact i mentioned the shiny metal? removed both].

  32. 32.

    Suffern ACE

    July 13, 2011 at 10:46 am

    Gingrich has often said they have no capital gains tax, as an argument for eliminating the US tax.

    In exchange for that, they can confiscate any gain they want, any time they want.

  33. 33.

    Zach

    July 13, 2011 at 10:47 am

    This is why the belt-tightening analogy fails. If a the head of household of a family becomes unemployed, they have to cut back. If the head of household becomes unemployed and then someone comes along offering an unlimited loan that only needs to be paid back with 3% interest after 10 years (not 3% APR; 3% total), cutting back is idiotic. The family should still live within its means, but the maximum available loan should be secured and combined with the family’s unused capacity for labor to start a new business.

  34. 34.

    Martin

    July 13, 2011 at 11:11 am

    This is why the belt-tightening analogy fails.

    You’re correct. But this is what the teatards hear when they read your post:

    Woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof unemployed, woof woof woof cut woof. Woof woof woof woof woof woof unemployed woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof loan woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof (woof woof woof; woof woof), woof woof woof idiotic. Woof woof woof woof woof welfare woof woof, woof woof woof woof soçialism woof woof woof woof woof woof woof looter woof woof woof woof liberal plot to destroy America.

  35. 35.

    DFH no.6

    July 13, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    Martin,

    You got that straight.

    Had this very conversation with one of my (too) many wingnut brothers-in-law over the 4th family get together.

    From WWII (but not the fed spending on such) ending the Great Depression, to the need to return to the gold standard, to Obama being the biggest tax-and-spender (and worst-president) ever, it was non-stop teatard, glibertarian nonsense from this otherwise well-educated and very intelligent person.

    When I made a similar analogy to Zach’s, he played the part of the dog in the Larson cartoon to the hilt.

    I may as well have been speaking Chinese.

  36. 36.

    TK-421

    July 13, 2011 at 1:21 pm

    If the U.S. could reduce its military spending a bit and spend more on improving the livelihood of the American people … wouldn’t that be a better scenario?” he said.

    Dear Beltway Assholes:

    Mein Gott im Himmel My God in Heaven, when a high-ranking military official from an oppressive/totalitarian regime thinks you’re being too cruel to the people, then you have well and truly gone round the bend. Please stop.

    Sincerely,

    America

  37. 37.

    El Cid

    July 13, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    The problem is that the interest rates are too high and we’re going broke paying them because of all the inflation and the massive government hiring.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - PaulB - Olympic Peninsula: Lake Quinault Loop Drive 5
Image by PaulB (5/19/25)

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 5:52pm)
  • JoyceH on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 5:52pm)
  • Baud on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 5:48pm)
  • comrade scotts agenda of rage on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 5:47pm)
  • trollhattan on Saving Biomedical Research (Open Thread) (May 19, 2025 @ 5:45pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!