• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

There is one struggling party in US right now, and it’s not the Democrats.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

There are a lot more evil idiots than evil geniuses.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

It is possible to do the right thing without the promise of a cookie.

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Be a traveling stable for those who can’t find room at the inn.

Donald Trump, welcome to your everything, everywhere, all at once.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. don’t touch it.”

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

At some point, the ability to learn is a factor of character, not IQ.

A consequence of cucumbers

People are complicated. Love is not.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

People are weird.

Republican speaker of the house Mike Johnson is the bland and smiling face of evil.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Not getting it

Not getting it

by DougJ|  July 16, 20118:21 am| 33 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

I’d like to apologize in advance for subjecting you to some idiotic drivel one of Sullivan’s stunt stand-ins wrote yesterday, about the awesomeness of old media.

So repeat after me: David Broder was a superb journalist. Look in the mirror every morning and say it three times. Say it loud, say it proud. When your efforts to tell multiple sides of the story, to set your opinions to one side, to go find things out, and to get your facts straight—when those efforts lead bloggers to accuse you of “high Broderism,” tell them you accept the compliment. And offer to help them reach the same level someday.

David Broder may have been a good straight reporter (when he wasn’t smearing Ed Muskie with lies) back in the day, but it’s ridiculous to say that one shouldn’t use an opinion column to express opinions. In fact, Broder expressed opinions constantly in his column, he told us how much he hated Harry Reid, how much he liked Karl Rove, how much he thought John Kerry was a know-it-all, etc. The fact that his opinions were often personal rather than policy-based doesn’t make them not opinions. Anyway, he had opinions about policy too: Obama should invade Iran to boost his re-election chances, Bowles-Simpson will save us all, etc.

The larger trouble here, as is always the case when old media types argue with the blogosphere, is that they conflate reporting with opinion writing, using the word “journalism” as a catch all. Obviously, all sane people have the utmost respect for Dana Priest, James Risen, Nick Davies, and their ilk. That doesn’t mean we have to love David Broder’s senile opinion column dodderings. These have nothing to do with each other. How can this idiot not know that?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Early Morning Open Thread
Next Post: Mitt Romney’s Bully Pulpit Will Have Lasers »

Reader Interactions

33Comments

  1. 1.

    Valdivia

    July 16, 2011 at 8:28 am

    I refuse the click to see who it is. That blog is crap when he is on vacation.

  2. 2.

    DougJ in Damascus

    July 16, 2011 at 8:33 am

    I refuse the click to see who it is. That blog is crap when he is on vacation.

    Someone named Jonathan Rauch. I actually like one of his fill-ins, Zoe Pollock, the others are uniformly awful.

  3. 3.

    ornery

    July 16, 2011 at 8:33 am

    Oh. Sully said something.

    Thank you for the very valuable information.

  4. 4.

    srv

    July 16, 2011 at 8:36 am

    I miss Broder like I miss Franco.

  5. 5.

    Linda Featheringill

    July 16, 2011 at 8:40 am

    Good morning, folks.

    Is it Saturday again? Already? Wow.

    “They” say that time goes faster as you get older but I haven’t experienced that until this year [I am 67]. Strange sensation.

    Anyway, don’t worry about what the village people have to say or what the Koch brothers have to say. They will grow old and die just like the rest of us.

    I’d like to see Murdoch & Co. get into enough trouble in the US to shake loose their propaganda machine. Do you think it would help if we agitated for investigations? Perhaps contacting our congresscritters?

  6. 6.

    mistermix

    July 16, 2011 at 8:40 am

    Setting aside the politics, Broder was, above all, boring, and his writing was at best serviceable. That’s the part I don’t get about all this Broder worship – if your work is going to pass the test of time, it should be at least interesting, and you ought to be something of a literary stylist. Broder’s work is the opposite.

  7. 7.

    bkny

    July 16, 2011 at 8:43 am

    here’s another priceless broder quote about bill clinton from one of the most noxious washington post sally quinn columns evah (and endless fodder):

    “He came in here and he trashed the place,” says Washington Post columnist David Broder, “and it’s not his place.”

  8. 8.

    arguingwithsignposts

    July 16, 2011 at 8:45 am

    Who the fuck is jonathan rauch?

    And writing a blog post in defense of old media? Irony, you’re soaking in it.

  9. 9.

    beltane

    July 16, 2011 at 8:48 am

    @DougJ

    Jonathan Rauch has been a second-string wanker for at least 20 years. I’m surprised he hasn’t gained more prominence among the Beltway set for his craptastic work. That said, it is sad to see that the Villagers are not only incapable of practising journalism, they don’t even know what it really is.

    I’m sure that if the useless Broder were still with us, he would be tut-tutting about how barbaric Nick Davies and The Guardian are, and how mean the President was to the well-meaning Eric Cantor.

  10. 10.

    Cat Lady

    July 16, 2011 at 8:51 am

    Has anyone wondered just once what David Broder would say about anything that’s happened since he died? Anyone? Bueller?

  11. 11.

    arguingwithsignposts

    July 16, 2011 at 8:54 am

    @cat lady:
    No, because everyone knows what broder would say: “both sides do it.”

  12. 12.

    kay

    July 16, 2011 at 8:59 am

    I feel like they’re defensive because Rupert Murdoch took over a whole country’s political system, and he’s a media mogul. One whole country. We think it’s one, anyway.

    While I realize traditional media also exposed him, it’s still a very disturbing and alarming revelation, considering their staunch defense and constant use of the “few bad apples” line re: FOX and all.

    Maybe I’m overanalyzing it, but when they talk incessantly about themselves (which they do a lot) it’s always right after they massively screw up.

  13. 13.

    dan

    July 16, 2011 at 9:02 am

    That blog is worse than crap when he is on vacation. Alex Massie licking Rupert Murdoch’s balls all week was especially sickening.

  14. 14.

    Kane

    July 16, 2011 at 9:06 am

    the blogosphere may be around for a while, but its heyday is over.

    Although some in the old media remain threatened by the blogosphere, the blogosphere is not the enemy. In large measure, the blogosphere is the result of the old media’s failures in journalism. Oftentimes the harshest critics in the blogosphere of old media are those who simply want old media to do its job. As long as there’s a yearning for more information than what the old media is willing to provide, the blogosphere will remain a vital alternative.

  15. 15.

    Valdivia

    July 16, 2011 at 9:12 am

    thanks DougJ. I like Zoe too, she is his underblogger though, so she is more into the Sully-Borg mindset I think and blogs like he does.

  16. 16.

    SiubhanDuinne

    July 16, 2011 at 9:16 am

    @srv #4: This just in. David Broder is still dead.

    @Linda Featheringill #5: I’m just a bit older than you (will turn 69 in a couple of weeks) and I’ve actually been experiencing that whole time speeds up thing for two or three decades. It’s an ancient and universal phenomenon, but that doesn’t make it any less weird.

    Wait, what?? It’s SATURDAY again??

  17. 17.

    ChrisNYC

    July 16, 2011 at 9:20 am

    Wow, what a courageous position over there at Sullivan’s blog.

    They will step up and defend “the dean of the Washington press corps,” a person who had a powerful microphone for thirty years, and who parleyed that microphone into well-paid speaking engagements before DC lobbyists. Impressive. Real public service there.

  18. 18.

    Scott

    July 16, 2011 at 9:43 am

    Rauch is trolling. He knows Broder was shit — the entire tone of the piece is “Ha ha, I’m going to get so many people mad with this one!”

  19. 19.

    Violet

    July 16, 2011 at 9:54 am

    I saw this last night when I skimmed the Sully C-team last posts last night and wondered if DougJ would post on it.

    DougJ, you are exactly right. Broder may have been a good journalist at some point, and might even have had the skills to continue to be one, but he wrote an OPINION column, and pandered his OPINIONS on Sunday shows and elsewhere. He spent the second half of his career spouting his opinion, not writing factual articles.

    I guess the good thing that came from Jonathan Rauch’s post is that we know now, if we weren’t sure before, that he can’t tell the difference between fact and opinion.

  20. 20.

    Brother Shotgun of Sweet Reason

    July 16, 2011 at 10:00 am

    @SiubhanDuinne: Simple explanation for why time speeds up. We don’t experience time as a linear thing. We experience it as a fraction of how long we’ve been around.

    So when you’re 8, summer lasts forever. It’s 3 months out of the 96 you’ve experienced, or 1/32 of your life. When you’re 60, it’s 1/240th, a much smaller amount. So summers don’t last as long, the older you get.

    The equivalent length of time to a 60-year old is 1/32 of 60 years, or 22.5 months.

    This has been CATSQ.

  21. 21.

    Villago Delenda Est

    July 16, 2011 at 10:13 am

    Broder’s entire career of mediocrity was based on a leak from operatives of the ’68 Nixon campaign on who Nixon’s running mate was going to be.

    The utterly corrupt criminal named Spiro Agnew.

  22. 22.

    SiubhanDuinne

    July 16, 2011 at 10:29 am

    @Brother Shotgun of Sweet Reason #20:

    Thanks. That’s pretty much the explanation I came up with (or someone pointed out to me) a long time ago, but you explained it more elegantly.

    Doesn’t explain, though, why I’ve been experiencing it rather intensely for 20-30-40 years, while Linda F., only a year or so younger than I am, has only just started noticing the phenomenon.

  23. 23.

    piratedan

    July 16, 2011 at 10:46 am

    another case of the Village writing for the Village, it’s like Children of the Corn, except its beltway punditry.

  24. 24.

    Amir_Khalid

    July 16, 2011 at 11:22 am

    Some days of the week, The Daily Beast’s blog server just ignores me, and I get timed out when I try to go to a blogger’s page there. So I’ve given up reading Andrew Sullivan as a regular thing, and found it no loss at all.

    This Jonathan Rauch, true to his surname, is just blowing smoke. His distinction between “old” (i.e. print) media and bloggers is pure bullshit. Both deliver journalism to their audience, or at least they’re supposed to. In that sense they’re the same thing, just differently packaged. The differences he cites between them are bogus; insofar as they exist, they are the differences between people at publications that are struggling and people at publications that are doing well.

    As to Rauch’s loud and proud praise of David Broder, that’s really funny. Broder was no bellwether of opinion. He valued consensus and decorum above all else. They have their place, but Broder was not one to recognize when other things were more important — for instance, when a prevailing mindset had outlived its usefulness. It is not praise to say of a pundit that he was the one sheep who always knew to stand exactly in the middle of his herd.

  25. 25.

    Ruckus

    July 16, 2011 at 11:46 am

    How can this idiot not know that?

    The answer is in the middle of your question.

  26. 26.

    a hip hop artist from Idaho (fka Bella Q)

    July 16, 2011 at 11:56 am

    Ruckus beat me to it. But you knew that, and I knew your question was rhetorical.

  27. 27.

    worn

    July 16, 2011 at 12:45 pm

    Seconding what Scott said…

    If you read Sully’s blog this week you’ll know Rauch has been engaging in this schtick since Monday. He came right out of the gate with a huge piece of link bait, one in which he took a crotchety old man “you kids get those newfangled internets off my lawn” kind of approach. It’s obvious to me that Rauch likes the ‘old’ media better than the new but was emplying hyperbolic language so as to cause a kerfluffle. I thought “With my triumph over the blogosphere complete…” gave a pretty good indication of where his tongue was planted. Plus, he wrote a pretty good piece years ago called “Caring For Your Introvert”, which at the time I read it was somewhat revelatory. But maybe that’s because I evidence all the manifestations he describes. To a tee.

    None of the above should be construed as a defense of David Broder. Reading his words was like eating chalk. And not the flavored kind.

  28. 28.

    JP Stormcrow

    July 16, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    bkny@7: “He came in here and he trashed the place,” says Washington Post columnist David Broder, “and it’s not his place.”

    And that is only the second most fatuous Broder quote in that article. For me the winner is: “The judgment is harsher in Washington,” says The Post’s Broder. “We don’t like being lied to.” Helluva a contempt for your audience there, faux regular guy.

    So repeat after me: “David Broder was a dick. Look in the mirror every morning and say it three times. Say it loud, say it proud.”

  29. 29.

    drkrick

    July 16, 2011 at 1:54 pm

    And that is only the second most fatuous Broder quote in that article. For me the winner is: “The judgment is harsher in Washington,” says The Post’s Broder. “We don’t like being lied to.” Helluva a contempt for your audience there, faux regular guy.

    Especially since they loved being lied to by Reagan and GW Bush, and never forgave the DFH contingent for not accepting LBJ’s lies. What they don’t like is having the voters make them cover someone who hasn’t been pre-approved by the cool kids table.

  30. 30.

    PhoenixRising

    July 16, 2011 at 2:32 pm

    Ranch is a sloppy, irresponsible shill for the status quo.

    He doesn’t accept comment on his so-called “ideas”, which is unfortunate because he could learn a lot from the rabble who dispute his notion that compromise is always the right path.

    I beat him like a rented mule 2 years ago, but he’s above acknowledging those of us who don’t get a shot at the NYT op-Ed:
    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/02/22/700542/-Open-Letter-to-Jonathan-Raush,-todays-NY-Times?via=blog_673627

  31. 31.

    Eric U.

    July 16, 2011 at 4:32 pm

    The best thing about Broder is that he didn’t leave an heir to remind us of him. Unlike Tim Russert. May the deities save us from future “journalists” like those two.

  32. 32.

    Thymezone

    July 16, 2011 at 5:54 pm

    Even in death, Broder continues to bedevil you.

    You are two of the three people on earth who could have listed a set of Broder’s malapropisms without looking them up.

  33. 33.

    JP Stormcrow

    July 16, 2011 at 6:24 pm

    drkrick@29: Especially since they loved being lied to by Reagan and GW Bush

    Yeah, that was the injury added to insult; after “trashed the place” and “don’t like being lied to”, he and the rest of the beltway hacks barely raise a whimper when GW shows up. I still don’t completely get it. Massively destructive assholes. Imagine a “Clintonian” press scrutiny of Abramoff, Gannon, Iraq war profiteering (starring Watergate instigator and liar L. Jean Lewis as Chief of Staff in the Inspector General’s Office of the Pentagon!), twenty other things in the first four years.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 782: If the Opposite of Pro Is Con, Then the Opposite of Progress is a GOP Majority in Congress (Apr 15, 2024 @ 11:13pm)
  • wjca on War for Ukraine Day 782: If the Opposite of Pro Is Con, Then the Opposite of Progress is a GOP Majority in Congress (Apr 15, 2024 @ 11:11pm)
  • NotMax on Monday Evening Open Thread: Another ‘Rich’ Narcissist, Having A Bad Start to His Week (Apr 15, 2024 @ 11:09pm)
  • Sister Inspired Revolver of Freedom on War for Ukraine Day 782: If the Opposite of Pro Is Con, Then the Opposite of Progress is a GOP Majority in Congress (Apr 15, 2024 @ 11:08pm)
  • RevRick on Campaigns, cash and poorly attached voters (Apr 15, 2024 @ 11:00pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!