• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

You cannot shame the shameless.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

The willow is too close to the house.

“But what about the lurkers?”

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

“More of this”, i said to the dog.

This fight is for everything.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / New and Improved Gerrymandering

New and Improved Gerrymandering

by John Cole|  July 20, 201112:47 pm| 47 Comments

This post is in: Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

North Carolina’s GOP is on the job:

What began as an adjustment involving five N.C. counties on Tuesday turned into a congressional map that jumbles districts across the state and pits four Democrats against other incumbents.

Republican lawmakers had promised a ripple effect when they began redrawing their 2-week-old map.

“That ripple effect turned out to be a tidal wave,” said Michael Bitzer, a political scientist at Salisbury’s Catawba College.

Among other things, the latest GOP plan would:

— Move Democratic U.S. Rep. Brad Miller of the 13th District into the 4th District represented by U.S. Rep. David Price, also a Democrat.

— Put Democratic U.S. Rep. Mike McIntyre of the 7th District into fellow Democratic U.S. Rep. Larry Kissell’s 8th District.

— Extend the eastern 1st District into Durham County, not Wake.

— Dramatically reshape the 2nd, 7th and 6th districts. The 6th District, represented by Republican Rep. Howard Coble, would gain eight new counties while taking much of the footprint of the current 13th District.

The new districts would shape N.C. politics for at least a decade. Legislative committees are scheduled to vote on the congressional and legislative redistricting plans this week. The full General Assembly is scheduled to vote next week.

You can view the maps here. This one is going to court. I know why they do it, because they are trying for as much advantage as possible, but it ought to be a law that computer models just make districts as even as possible.

The one upside is that Shuler’s district is becoming more heavily Republican, so maybe he will switch parties and become their problem or lose. Either one is acceptable to me. That also may be why he was looking into going to the UT Athletic Department to bring his special brand of incompetence to their sports program.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread
Next Post: Like a slow train coming »

Reader Interactions

47Comments

  1. 1.

    NobodySpecial

    July 20, 2011 at 12:49 pm

    The one upside is that Shuler’s district is becoming more heavily Republican, so maybe he will switch parties and become their problem or lose. Either one is acceptable to me.

    Next time I hear you screaming about purity and Firebaggers, I want you to remember this quote.

  2. 2.

    aimai

    July 20, 2011 at 12:50 pm

    Its just staggeringly awful how much of our democracy is left up to local malfeasance: voter registration, districting, voting itself. I’ve worked as a clerk of the elections and we always do our best but the rules for who votes where–let alone the rules for how the districts are drawn and redrawn–are arcane and designed to disenfranchise voters on a regular basis.

    aimai

  3. 3.

    aimai

    July 20, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    NobodySpecial – July 20, 2011 | 12:49 pm · Link

    That’s silly. There is the same difference between John’s observation and Firebagger hysteria as there is between wishing that someone would die and actively trying to kill them.

    aimai

  4. 4.

    Dave

    July 20, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    I can’t imagine Gov. Purdue is going to sign off on this.

  5. 5.

    NobodySpecial

    July 20, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    Oh yeah, in other news; Illinois Democrats did the same thing to Republicans. It will be a bloodbath, and part of the reason why redistricting won’t guarantee a new wave for the GOP.

  6. 6.

    Napoleon

    July 20, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    but it ought to be a law that computer models just make districts as even as possible.

    I know that sounds good, but exactly what does it mean in practice? For example do you try to make each district, as practicable as possible, reflect the partisan balance of the state or are you going for straight lines and compactness. Note that if it is the second it has the effect of causing Dems to be underrepresented (what happens currently) because they tend to be found in high density areas. So you end up with a few Dem districts where you could run Hitler’s dog with a “D” after his name and he would win and a bunch of Rep leaning districts.

  7. 7.

    NobodySpecial

    July 20, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    @aimai: No, no, no, m’lady.

    Silly is pretending that there’s a difference between ‘Firebagger’ hopes that centrist Dems like Lincoln, Landrieu, and Nelson get ousted through primaries and Cole’s hopes that redistricting makes a seat GOP without a primary.

    If you want to argue that any D > any R, which is the standard rejoinder to Progressives who complain about Blue Dogs, then you shouldn’t be willing to kick Shuler out without being labeled a hypocrite.

  8. 8.

    MobiusKlein

    July 20, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    I think it’s time for at-large districts?
    Or at least for large states, half at large, half regional?

  9. 9.

    cmorenc

    July 20, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    @John Cole:

    The one upside is that Shuler’s district is becoming more heavily Republican, so maybe he will switch parties and become their problem or lose. Either one is acceptable to me.

    Heath Schuler’s is a long way from my cup of tea, either. However, in Schuler’s district (as it more or less has been pre-2010 census redistricting), he’s unfortunately about as good as it gets while still being electable by drawing enough votes in the red areas outside Asheville. You clearly don’t know the history of that district, in which a TRULY odious GOP congressman, Charles Taylor, held the district for years. Taylor was hard right-wing, anti-environmental everything and government-must-get out of the way of business and with the social conservatives on every issue, only he didn’t make himself into a grandstanding public spectacle of idiocy like e.g. Virginia Fox or Patrick McHenry.

  10. 10.

    celticdragonchick

    July 20, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    The teabaggers (IE Virginia Foxx and her Krazy Klub) really made gains last year here in NC, and they are busy rigging the system to make sure it will be impossible to dislodge them.

  11. 11.

    Han's Big Snark Solo

    July 20, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    That also may be why he was looking into going to the UT Athletic Department to bring his special brand of incompetence to their sports program.

    Arrghh, you freaked me out. I thought you meant University of Texas! The Longhorns, and Austin, don’t need that, don’t want that and hopefully would never allow that!

  12. 12.

    jwest

    July 20, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    Without the fine art of gerrymandering, the country would be deprived of some of the best minds in the Congress…

    …and we would still be unaware of the possibility that Guam could tip over.

  13. 13.

    Nate

    July 20, 2011 at 1:00 pm

    @Dave- Perdue can’t veto it. Redistricting in NC doesn’t need the Governor’s approval. That’s one the reasons the GOP can be so extreme here.

  14. 14.

    monkey knife fight

    July 20, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    That also may be why he was looking into going to the UT Athletic Department to bring his special brand of incompetence to their sports program.

    Sha! Like the Vols need any more help in that department.

  15. 15.

    cmorenc

    July 20, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    @Dave:

    Do Perdue’s veto powers extend to redistricting plans? She and the NC democrats have been strangely silent so far about this potential option, if it exists.

  16. 16.

    Bulworth

    July 20, 2011 at 1:07 pm

    Shuler was one of a handful of teabag Democrats to vote for the just passed Cap, Kill and UnBalance budget busting bill.

  17. 17.

    Dave

    July 20, 2011 at 1:08 pm

    @Nate – Well, that’s just depressing as Hell. Does the Voting Rights Act come into play here? Because I would bet the GOP is either spreading the minority vote super-thin or packing them into as few districts as possible.

  18. 18.

    jibeaux

    July 20, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    @ #1 Shuler was one of five whole democrats to vote for the teabag bill, as Bulworth noted. Against the ACA, etc. While it was already a tough district for a Democrat and he could be excused some stupidity, as a Democrat, he’s completely useless. The firebagger types can’t make the distinction between that, and partly-useless-but-probably-the-best-we-can-do-from-that-district.

  19. 19.

    askew

    July 20, 2011 at 1:17 pm

    Voting Rights Act does apply to NC and there will likely be a lawsuit over it.

  20. 20.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    July 20, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    @jibeaux:

    While it was already a tough district for a Democrat and he could be excused some stupidity, as a Democrat, he’s completely useless. The firebagger types can’t make the distinction between that, and partly-useless-but-probably-the-best-we-can-do-from-that-district.

    Yes, it sounds difficult enough that we should probably check with you in each case.

  21. 21.

    Martin

    July 20, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    I know that sounds good, but exactly what does it mean in practice? For example do you try to make each district, as practicable as possible, reflect the partisan balance of the state or are you going for straight lines and compactness.

    Well, here’s what CA has done:

    The 14-member Commission is made up of five Republicans, five Democrats, and 4 not affiliated with either of those two parties but registered with another party or as decline-to-state. The Commission must draw the district lines in conformity with strict, nonpartisan rules designed to create districts of relatively equal population that will provide fair representation for all Californians. The Commission must hold public hearings and accept public comment. After hearing from the public and drawing the maps for the House of Representatives districts, 40 Senate districts, 80 Assembly districts, and four Board of Equalization districts, the Commission must vote on the new maps to be used for the next decade. To approve the new maps, the maps must receive nine “yes” votes from the Commission—three “yes” votes from members registered with the two largest parties, and three “yes” votes from the other members.

    The commission is a bit complicated, but its made up of 8 commissioners who apply for the job, applicants can be vetoed by the legislature, and the remaining applicants are then selected by a panel based on relevant skills, diversity (geographic and otherwise) and so on. Those 8 are trained and then choose 6 members to fill out the commission – designed so they can add expertise, etc.

    Generally speaking, the districts are being drawn up along similar economic and demographic lines. So urban and agricultural areas aren’t smashed together into one district with competing interests. All the big money coastal folks are getting their district. Suburban cities form a district, and so on. While that sounds like it will make districts more partisan than currently, another part of the commissions charge is when an opportunity presents itself to make districts more balanced. Simply put, they aren’t doing the electoral math to marginalize voting groups, which is really what gerrymandering is designed to do.

    Another part of the effort was to move to a different runoff system where the two primary candidates with the most votes move onto the general, regardless of party. The intent is that in a deep red or blue district, you won’t be advantaged to run out to the extremes to win the primary and then saddle the general population with batshit positions, because in a heavily leaning district that losing candidate in the primary will follow you to the general and if they lost the primary on moderate views, they may win the general on those views.

    The requirements for the maps are as follows:

    (1) Districts shall comply with the United States Constitution. Senate,
    Assembly, and State Board of Equalization districts shall have reasonably
    equal population with other districts for the same office, except where
    deviation is required to comply with the federal Voting Rights Act or allowable
    by law.
    (2) Districts shall comply with the federal Voting Rights Act (42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1971 and following).
    (3) Districts shall be geographically contiguous.
    (4) The geographic integrity of any city, county, city and county,
    neighborhood, or community of interest shall be respected to the extent
    possible without violating the requirements of any of the preceding subdivisions.
    Communities of interest shall not include relationships with political parties,
    incumbents, or political candidates.
    (5) To the extent practicable, and where this does not conflict with the
    criteria above, districts shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness such that nearby areas of population are not bypassed for more distant population.
    (6) To the extent practicable, and where this does not conflict with the
    criteria above, each Senate district shall be comprised of two whole, complete,
    and adjacent Assembly districts, and each Board of Equalization district shall
    be comprised of 10 whole, complete, and adjacent Senate districts.
    (e) The place of residence of any incumbent or political candidate shall not
    be considered in the creation of a map. Districts shall not be drawn for the
    purpose of favoring or discriminating against an incumbent, political
    candidate, or political party.
    (f) Districts for the Senate, Assembly, and State Board of Equalization shall
    be numbered consecutively commencing at the northern boundary of the State and ending at the southern boundary.
    (g) By September 15 in 2011, and in each year ending in the number one
    thereafter, the commission shall approve three final maps that separately set
    forth the district boundary lines for the Senate, Assembly, and State Board of
    Equalization districts. Upon approval, the commission shall certify the three
    final maps to the Secretary of State.
    (h) The commission shall issue, with each of the three final maps, a report
    that explains the basis on which the commission made its decisions in achieving compliance with the criteria listed in subdivision (d) and shall include definitions of the terms and standards used in drawing each final map

    I won’t pretend it’s perfect or anything, but it’s a shitload better than just turning it over to a political party.

  22. 22.

    dpcap

    July 20, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    I had no idea NC was so blue to begin with. I always assumed it was 95% red.

  23. 23.

    Martin

    July 20, 2011 at 1:37 pm

    I had no idea NC was so blue to begin with

    Obama won NC by about half a percent.

  24. 24.

    Don SinFalta

    July 20, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    … he was looking into going to the UT Athletic Department to bring his special brand of incompetence to their sports program.

    Oh, the University of Tennessee sports program. You had me worried for a minute, the University of Texas sports program already has more than its quota of incompetence, thank you.

  25. 25.

    jl

    July 20, 2011 at 1:45 pm

    @21: The new California system will be interesting to watch. I heard an election expert (who said he was non partisan) interviewed in the radio who predicted a 4 to 5 Democratic seat pick up in state legislature if the final plans looked like the initial proposals.

    That sounds odd since the Democrats controlled both chambers during the last redistricting. But CA political activists have told me that CA state Democrats basically cooperated with GOP in effort to protect incumbents in the previous redistricting, and that some state GOP charity case districts were very gerrymandered.

    So, if nonpartisan commission districts do result in several state GOPpers losing their seats, in the cause of old fashioned, high minded, responsible (and extinct) GOP reform googooism, that would be nice.

    Issue now, as I understand from Calitics, is fact that state commission may be sued and the final maps would really would be done by judges. Apparently the GOP will sue if they think they will lose seats.

    After recent CA GOP behavior, I find it difficult to believe the CA Democrats in the leg would do them any favors in this redistricting. But, on other hands, a map made by judges based on commission could be OK.

    ” But that doesn’t mean that judges may not end up making the maps. Tom Del Beccaro, the CRP Chairman has been making noises about how the maps favor Democrats. Apparently he wants districts carved out for his legislators, and doesn’t like the fact that the districts more closely represent the fact that Democrats have a rather sizable registration advantage in the state. I would be pretty shocked if the CRP or some closely related proxy group doesn’t sue shortly after the August 15 due date. He’s basically said as much. ”

    This Isn’t Going to Be Easy
    by: Brian Leubitz
    Wed Jul 20, 2011 at 08:42:06 AM PDT

    Redistricting Commission Ready for Legal Attacks
    by Brian Leubitz

    http://calitics.com/diary/13702/this-isnt-going-to-be-easy

  26. 26.

    Three-nineteen

    July 20, 2011 at 1:50 pm

    @jibeaux: I’ve come to realize that individual Democratic votes may not mean as much as retaining the majority. Just think about it — if 20-odd House members change their affiliation, we get Speaker Pelosi back, all the committee chairs, etc. Even if they continued to vote as if they were Republicans, this is a huge win.

  27. 27.

    Logan

    July 20, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    NC is very blue in the cities and the eastern part of the state…. granted we elected yellow dogs there, but still… .

    This map is so insane that the usual mantra of “Well the Democrats did this” isn’t flying with the political class here…now the teabaggers love it but they are stupid as a pig in mud and don’t know anything about anything.

    I’m fairly certain that the courts will laugh the map out and force them to redraw it a couple of times. The only thing I am not sure about is what they will do in 2012 if a map hasn’t been approved.

  28. 28.

    Corner Stone

    July 20, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    The one upside is that Shuler’s district is becoming more heavily Republican, so maybe he will switch parties and become their problem or lose. Either one is acceptable to me.

    So are we to understand you would not “crawl over broken glass” to vote for Shuler if you were in NC?

  29. 29.

    Corner Stone

    July 20, 2011 at 2:07 pm

    @NobodySpecial:

    If you want to argue that any D > any R, which is the standard rejoinder to Progressives who complain about Blue Dogs, then you shouldn’t be willing to kick Shuler out without being labeled a hypocrite.

    Don’t mind aimai. It’s sometimes hard for her to see the point from so far up on her high horse.

  30. 30.

    Corner Stone

    July 20, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    @jibeaux:

    Shuler was one of five whole democrats to vote for the teabag bill, as Bulworth noted. Against the ACA, etc. While it was already a tough district for a Democrat and he could be excused some stupidity, as a Democrat, he’s completely useless. The firebagger types can’t make the distinction between that, and partly-useless-but-probably-the-best-we-can-do-from-that-district.

    “Nothing can be done!”
    No, wait…
    “Best we can do!”

  31. 31.

    AAA Bonds

    July 20, 2011 at 2:32 pm

    Oh my god, could you be more tone-deaf toward North Carolina?

    You know I am not a fucking fan of right-wing Democrats but the shift of Buncombe-Asheville to a Democratic seat was one of the biggest wins for the Dems in 2006.

    The Republicans who held that seat before Shuler were an unbroken line of raving lunatics.

    In 2004, I lived in Asheville, and I would NEVER have predicted that seat going to a Democrat in the next ten years. The split between the urban center and the surrounding area was far too prominent.

  32. 32.

    AAA Bonds

    July 20, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    @dpcap:

    I had no idea NC was so blue to begin with. I always assumed it was 95% red.

    It’s one of the most important battleground states in the entire country. Obama recognizes this, obviously, as does the national party.

  33. 33.

    Chyron HR

    July 20, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    The Firebagger Credo:

    1) Primary Obama for being insufficently liberal.
    2) Primary Barney Frank for being insufficently liberal. (*)
    3) Leave Heath Shuler ALOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONE.

    (*) This is what True Progressives actually believe.

  34. 34.

    AAA Bonds

    July 20, 2011 at 2:42 pm

    I mean, look at the Republicans who popped up in Shuler’s seat whenever they could wrest it from the Democrats. Chuck Taylor (anti-gay, anti-environment, attached at the hip to Russia’s shock doctrine), Bill Hendon (conspiracy theorist and POW/MIA nut), and . . . Bill fucking Hendon. AGAIN.

    I will readily take Shuler over the alternatives I’ve seen in NC-11.

  35. 35.

    AAA Bonds

    July 20, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    How about everyone who doesn’t know shit about North Carolina try posting on another thread?

  36. 36.

    Martin

    July 20, 2011 at 2:44 pm

    That sounds odd since the Democrats controlled both chambers during the last redistricting. But CA political activists have told me that CA state Democrats basically cooperated with GOP in effort to protect incumbents in the previous redistricting, and that some state GOP charity case districts were very gerrymandered.

    Protecting incumbents of your own party and destroying incumbents of the other is just as much a part of the process. Dems have been knocking at the door of a 2/3 majority in both state chambers for a while – protecting those incumbent seats has been quite important.

    I agree it’ll be interesting to watch. It’s relatively open as these things go, and having regular citizens on the commission is pretty interesting as well. Politically there doesn’t seem to be much noise from the commission itself, which is a bit of a surprise. I think knowing that you have to get a majority of votes out of every political group forces things to be much less partisan.

    Issue now, as I understand from Calitics, is fact that state commission may be sued and the final maps would really would be done by judges. Apparently the GOP will sue if they think they will lose seats.

    Of course they’ll sue. That’s what they do. But the judges would need to find that the commission violated part of Prop 11, and I doubt they’ll find that, nor do judges like to go against voter initiatives unless they’re clearly out of bounds (like Prop 8). Shit, Prop 11 states right there that voter affiliation and incumbents are to not be considered in the districting. They can’t really expect to win by arguing that the commission did what the voter initiative forced them to do.

    Either way, the map is going to toss all incumbents for a loop. Even if they aren’t being forced to run against another incumbent, their district is going to change, so they’re going to have a significant number of new voters to have to reach out to. Given what just happened in the budget, where the Dems bit the bullet and made the spending cuts, it’s hard for independents to see what the GOP message is going to be – they have no power, they contribute nothing. Voting GOP here is now about as useful toward the outcome as voting Green or Libertarian. Why not just pick the Dem that best represents your interests?

  37. 37.

    AAA Bonds

    July 20, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    Here’s another thing worth doing before anyone offers further uninformed opinion: do a little research on redistricting, North Carolina, and the U.S. Supreme Court.

  38. 38.

    Martin

    July 20, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    I’ve come to realize that individual Democratic votes may not mean as much as retaining the majority.

    Correct. The greatest power in the House and Senate is the power to decide what bills get a vote and what bills don’t. And when. If your caucus won’t support a bill, don’t bring it to a vote, don’t have your committees vote it out of committee.

    To a large degree, majority power is veto power. It won’t get you what you want, but most of the time you can stop what you don’t want.

  39. 39.

    Roger Moore

    July 20, 2011 at 2:55 pm

    @jl:
    The Republicans may sue to overturn the commission’s decision, but that’s no guarantee they’ll win their case. They’ll need to present some actual evidence that the commission produced a map that doesn’t comply with their official mandate, which seems to be lacking. I doubt they’ll manage to accomplish anything more than delaying the inevitable, though that delay might let them prevent the Democrats from getting 2/3 majorities in both houses of the State Legislature for another 2 years.

  40. 40.

    John PM

    July 20, 2011 at 3:11 pm

    Here is the latest from Illinois re: redistricting:

    The state’s top Republican legislative leaders today led the filing of a federal lawsuit challenging a Democratic-drawn remapping of the state’s House and Senate districts, alleging it unfairly discriminates against African Americans and Latinos.

    Also part of the suit are African American and Latino plaintiffs. But the suit was not joined by such civil rights groups as the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, which typically weighs in when it views that a remap denies appropriate representation and voting opportunities for Latinos.

    I do not know how they will be able to keep a straight face when making that argument.

  41. 41.

    John Puma

    July 20, 2011 at 3:15 pm

    Three “rewards” for a Democratic president acting like a Republican:

    1) Lose the House and almost the Senate
    2) Influx of frankly fascist governors
    3) Lose control of lots of state legislatures resulting in “unfavorable” redistricting

  42. 42.

    Roger Moore

    July 20, 2011 at 3:25 pm

    @John PM:

    I do not know how they will be able to keep a straight face when making that argument.

    Simple, the inability to lie with a straight face comes from shame and guilt about lying. Since the Republican leaders are sociopaths, they lack the moral qualms that might cause them to feel shame or guilt about anything. That makes it easy for them to say anything they like with a perfectly straight face.

  43. 43.

    jl

    July 20, 2011 at 3:28 pm

    “it’s hard for independents to see what the GOP message is going to be”

    As far as I can tell, the recent CA GOP messaging has been ‘eff you’. Not sure that will stand up in next election.

    I am surprised at their behavior. I think the new CA open primary system is looming and they will have to run against all comers, so would think they would try to moderate their views. Will be interesting to see if any of them, especially the most publicly thuggish extremists, get knocked out by moderates in future open primaries.

  44. 44.

    Berial

    July 20, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    I remember being taught in social studies that Gerrymandering wasn’t legal. I remember looking at my first voting district map about a year later and realizing that my social studies class was full of shit.

  45. 45.

    Roger Moore

    July 20, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    @jl:

    As far as I can tell, the recent CA GOP messaging has been ‘eff you’. Not sure that will stand up in next election.

    Then you haven’t been paying very careful attention. Saying “Fuck You!” to the Democrats has been an important part of the Republican campaign strategy for quite a while, and it’s becoming more and more important as time goes on. The Republican primary could probably be replaced with a public “Fuck You!” screaming contest without a substantial change in outcome. In the places where screaming “Fuck You!” as loud as possible wasn’t a winning strategy, the Republican candidate was going to lose big time anyway.

  46. 46.

    John X.

    July 20, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    In 2004, I lived in Asheville, and I would NEVER have predicted that seat going to a Democrat in the next ten years. The split between the urban center and the surrounding area was far too prominent.

    The figures I’ve seen suggest that anywhere from a fourth to a third of Western North Carolina’s economy is based on marijuana production*, has the largest per capita gay population on the East Coast and has a huge young hippie/hipster population. The conservative, evangelical types have been pushed out of Buncombe, and the surrounding areas are getting a lot bluer, as well.

    * Not a joke. If you visit, you’ll quickly realize that it’s an insanely 420 friendly area.

  47. 47.

    metalgirl

    July 21, 2011 at 12:11 am

    I live in David Price’s district and will be losing him as my rep if this goes through. HATE THAT!! If others are in the same situation, we ALL need to get involved with our local officials (I am with the Dems in Wake Co) to organize and fight this before it becomes official. If it becomes the law, we must unite and fight even harder to overcome these boundaries for the next 10 years. We must dig in :)

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • Scout211 on Roast Chicken Chronicles…entry [n]…. (Feb 6, 2023 @ 2:20pm)
  • Ruckus on Monday Morning Open Thread: Go, Team Biden! (Feb 6, 2023 @ 2:20pm)
  • Kent on Roast Chicken Chronicles…entry [n]…. (Feb 6, 2023 @ 2:20pm)
  • Suzanne on Roast Chicken Chronicles…entry [n]…. (Feb 6, 2023 @ 2:19pm)
  • Scout211 on Roast Chicken Chronicles…entry [n]…. (Feb 6, 2023 @ 2:17pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!