• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Bark louder, little dog.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

We still have time to mess this up!

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

When do the post office & the dmv weigh in on the wuhan virus?

T R E 4 5 O N

“woke” is the new caravan.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

After roe, women are no longer free.

You cannot shame the shameless.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Economics / Free Markets Solve Everything / If I Were a Conspiracy Theorist

If I Were a Conspiracy Theorist

by $8 blue check mistermix|  August 18, 20118:54 am| 40 Comments

This post is in: Free Markets Solve Everything

FacebookTweetEmail

A more suspicious person than me could well wonder whether part of S&P’s motivation for the debt downgrade was innoculation against this:

The Justice Department is investigating whether the nation’s largest credit ratings agency, Standard & Poor’s, improperly rated dozens of mortgage securities in the years leading up to the financial crisis, according to two people interviewed by the government and another briefed on such interviews.

The investigation began before Standard & Poor’s cut the United States’ AAA credit rating this month, but it is likely to add fuel to the political firestorm that has surrounded that action. Lawmakers and some administration officials have since questioned the agency’s secretive process, its credibility and the competence of its analysts, claiming to have found an error in its debt calculations.

An indictment would look like retaliation at this moment, wouldn’t it?

Also, too: FSM save us from innumerate reporters and/or chickenshit editors. Isn’t it established fact that S&P made a huge error in its original writeup? Shorter NYT: “Some claim that 2+2 = 4. Others disagree.”

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Even-Keeled Progressive
Next Post: I Thought The Same Thing »

Reader Interactions

40Comments

  1. 1.

    Villago Delenda Est

    August 18, 2011 at 8:59 am

    Well, certainly some would say that it was retaliation for the downgrade of the US Government.

    Certainly!

  2. 2.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    August 18, 2011 at 9:02 am

    Which is one of the reasons there are firewalls between the various agencies, so that the political consequences of one decision don’t affect the administrative decisions of another.

  3. 3.

    Villago Delenda Est

    August 18, 2011 at 9:04 am

    The third paragraph is pretty telling:

    In the mortgage inquiry, the Justice Department has been asking about instances in which the company’s analysts wanted to award lower ratings on mortgage bonds but may have been overruled by other S.& P. business managers, according to the people with knowledge of the interviews. If the government finds enough evidence to support such a case, which is likely to be a civil case, it could undercut S.& P.’s longstanding claim that its analysts act independently from business concerns.

    So, the analysts seem to have taken their job seriously, but management, ever conscious of S&P’s own bottom line, overruled them? This tracks with anecdotes about analysts telling bankers that “the market is tapped out, no more growth there” and of course the bankers saying “that can’t be, our growth numbers need to keep going up, lower lending standards to get those numbers up!”.

    This Ferengi shit is going to destroy everything in the end.

    On edit, oh, and the fifth paragraph:

    During the boom years, S.& P. and other ratings agencies reaped record profits as they bestowed their highest ratings on bundles of troubled mortgage loans, which made the mortgages appear less risky and thus more valuable. They failed to anticipate the deterioration that would come in the housing market and devastate the financial system.

    More like the need for short term profit outweighed any concern about the long term prospects of the financial system…

  4. 4.

    Linda Featheringill

    August 18, 2011 at 9:05 am

    Interesting that this should come up now. Yes, it does look like retaliation.

    The whole fuss and bother about the sovereign debt rating has created an opportunity for the US people to step back from their “We’re number one” position. I’ve been concerned about this for some time and hoping we as a nation could do that without declaring war on anybody and everybody. Maybe we can.

    Argue, sue, litigate, lobby, and emote. It might be good for everybody.

  5. 5.

    Stefan

    August 18, 2011 at 9:05 am

    Did they claim to find an error or was there, in fact, an error? Oh well, I suppose there’s no way to know! Reasonable people can disagree!

  6. 6.

    Linda Featheringill

    August 18, 2011 at 9:07 am

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    This Ferengi shit is going to destroy everything in the end.

    Probably. :-)

  7. 7.

    KCinDC

    August 18, 2011 at 9:08 am

    Belafon, I’m sure the firewalls will keep the right-wing noise machine from screaming about political retaliation if the DoJ takes any action against S&P, and if they do scream anyway, no doubt the firewalls will keep the media from paying them any attention.

  8. 8.

    mistermix

    August 18, 2011 at 9:08 am

    @Stefan: Opinions do certainly differ.

  9. 9.

    Mark S.

    August 18, 2011 at 9:08 am

    Before the financial crisis, banks shopped around to make sure rating agencies would award favorable ratings before agreeing to work with them. These banks paid upward of $100,000 for ratings on mortgage bond deals, according to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, and several hundreds of thousands of dollars for the more complex structures known as collateralized debt obligations.

    O RLY? I thought they were just stupid. I didn’t know they were taking six figure payments.

  10. 10.

    paradox

    August 18, 2011 at 9:09 am

    Oh please, I’ll believe it when I see it. Someone in the mortgage fiasco being held accountable? Riiiiiight.

    They don’t have the moxie to do it, period. If they did then they’d have to prosecute all the little felons in that tightly woven group.

    Heh. Oh yeah, I can see it.

  11. 11.

    MattF

    August 18, 2011 at 9:12 am

    It’s incompetence. Given a choice between conspiracy and incompetence, the right answer is always incompetence. Not to mention that, IMO, a conspiracy would be proof of incompetence. And this is especially true– really and deeply and truly, truly true– if you’re talking about bureaucrats.

  12. 12.

    Villago Delenda Est

    August 18, 2011 at 9:12 am

    You know what it looks like? S&P retaliating the investigation of their shitty business practices so they downgrade US government securities. If only the government had bribed S&P’s “business managers”, the ones most likely with MBAs from Ivies, like the banks did.

    “Nice army you’ve got there, general. It would be a shame if anything happened to it…”

  13. 13.

    cleek

    August 18, 2011 at 9:14 am

    i’ve read a few wingnut comments, here and there, which seem pretty sure it wasn’t an error, but rather a choice to use one baseline over another, or something. in the wingnut universe, this ‘error’ is just another liberal media attack.

  14. 14.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    August 18, 2011 at 9:21 am

    @KCinDC: I am under no illusion that the firewalls will magically make Republicans reasonable, but after seeing the arguments over why ICE doesn’t work with the FBI and CIA and why the Federal Reserve doesn’t cooperate with other organizations, what happens when something gets politicized is part of the answer.

  15. 15.

    moonbat

    August 18, 2011 at 9:25 am

    Where are the complainers who have been screaming on threads for years that the Obama administration was turning a blind eye to Wall Street malfeasance? A Justice Department investigation into ratings agencies doesn’t sound like a blind eye. Not as immediately gratifying as banksters jumping out windows or being dragged into the street by the tie and publicly tried, drawn and quartered, but it looks like we may end up seeing a measure of justice on this issue after all.
    I think S&P thought the other rating agencies would follow their lead to downgrade US bonds and that would give them more leverage, but since no one did, it looks like a threat, based on bad math, and yeah I don’t think that’s going to stop the JD investigation.

  16. 16.

    John Puma

    August 18, 2011 at 9:31 am

    An effective indictment would cite the gross apparent misfeasance of the debt-ceiling downgrade to reinforce the charge of suspected fraud.

    Or does the DOJ adhere to the “strategy” of pathological bipartisanship like other departments of the administration?

    This is not to mention “putting behind us” previous atrocities so to effectively invite the next, even worse, atrocity.

  17. 17.

    RossInDetroit

    August 18, 2011 at 9:35 am

    2nd para of the Times piece:

    The investigation began before Standard & Poor’s cut the United States’ AAA credit rating this month, but it is likely to add fuel to the political firestorm that has surrounded that action.

    So they were looking at S&P’s mortgage ratings before the US credit downgrade. Clearly the investigation is not direct retaliation for the downgrade. Expect that inconvenient fact to be ignored by the Right.

    I hope this investigation has been going on for a while. It would be great to see prosecutions between now and 11/2012. One more thing to focus on the real causes of the recession.

  18. 18.

    Original Lee

    August 18, 2011 at 9:40 am

    I tried to tell my wingnutty neighbor after the downgrade that S&P was in bed with big money interests, and he wouldn’t hear it. “That’s just not possible,” he said. “They have to be objective and neutral or the whole stock market falls apart.” Um, yeah. I think I’ll e-mail him this link now.

  19. 19.

    Kirk Spencer

    August 18, 2011 at 9:40 am

    The question that comes to mind is: who told the media that Justice was investigating?

    It does look like innoculation; or maybe pre-emptive fire is a better description.

  20. 20.

    TK421

    August 18, 2011 at 9:43 am

    An indictment would look like retaliation at this moment, wouldn’t it?

    Possibly, which is why a competent administration would have looked into these ratings agencies much sooner.

  21. 21.

    Steve

    August 18, 2011 at 9:46 am

    I wish Congress wouldn’t waste its time trying to “investigate” the downgrade decision. They’re not going to find a smoking gun (“hey guys, let’s downgrade Treasuries to inoculate ourselves against the DOJ investigation!”) and it feeds the retaliation narrative in a serious way. This DOJ investigation is much more important.

  22. 22.

    WereBear

    August 18, 2011 at 9:54 am

    This is why I think there has to be some Pullback at this point.

    To a great extent money is whatever everyone agrees it is. This foundation, rocked by financial institutions who mistook the appearance of solvency as its actuality,has only been worsened by the Tea Party’s mistaking their use of a credit card for understanding of actual governance.

    SOME of them, I hope, have lost their taste for gambling. It doesn’t matter how many toys you die with when Crazy Azzholes are poised to trigger the sun going nova.

    The MSM dares criticize the Tea Party. They are going to split off.

  23. 23.

    Dennis SGMM

    August 18, 2011 at 9:57 am

    The current business model, critics say, is riddled with conflicts of interest, since ratings agencies might make their grades more positive to please their customers.

    No! Really? Good thing that the shit ton of shaky investment vehicles that were given the best possible ratings in no way bears out this contention.

  24. 24.

    Original Lee

    August 18, 2011 at 9:58 am

    @TK421: The DOJ started this probe at least a year ago, maybe eighteen months ago, IIRC. Its’ just been slow because they’ve been sweeping up after a lot of other violators.

  25. 25.

    patrick II

    August 18, 2011 at 10:08 am

    If S&P management was taking what can be construed as bribes for improperly high ratings of mortgage derivates, how can you stop with S&P? Wouldn’t you have to follow the leads to the persons or institutions doing the bribing as well?

  26. 26.

    shortstop

    August 18, 2011 at 10:12 am

    @Original Lee: Not good enough! It should have started on January 20, 2009, while Obama was wasting time watching some damn parade! Anything else is gross incompetence.

    Sorry to jump in, TK421. Just saving you a little time.

  27. 27.

    Dennis SGMM

    August 18, 2011 at 10:14 am

    @patrick II:
    It isn’t a bribe, it’s a fee for service. Any correlation between the amount of the fee and the resultant rating is strictly coincidental – or so they’ll say.

  28. 28.

    kdaug

    August 18, 2011 at 10:19 am

    @RossInDetroit:

    I hope this investigation has been going on for a while.

    CNN just had the reporter from the NYT front page piece on, saying that the people she’d interviewed had been contacted by DOJ earlier this summer.

  29. 29.

    Culture of Truth

    August 18, 2011 at 10:26 am

    Everyone knows litigation is just like Law & Order, where cases are investigated in the morning, filed in the afternoon and wrapped up by sundown.

  30. 30.

    Robert Waldmann

    August 18, 2011 at 10:47 am

    A trillion here a trillion there and soon you’re talking real money.

  31. 31.

    Villago Delenda Est

    August 18, 2011 at 11:02 am

    @Culture of Truth:

    If only that were true, as we’d get a lot more Lenny Brisco snark.

  32. 32.

    Stefan

    August 18, 2011 at 11:04 am

    @Original Lee:

    Did it escape his notice that the whole stock market did, in fact, fall apart? It was in all the papers.

  33. 33.

    Original Lee

    August 18, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    @Stefan: I have no idea what he meant by that. I was too flabbergasted. Maybe he meant that the brokers wouldn’t know whom to trust anymore, or something.

  34. 34.

    Halcyan

    August 18, 2011 at 4:32 pm

    Does anyone think that the issue was S&P negotiating with the administration to drop the inquiry, and then when the did not, they lowered the US credit rating? Was the credit rating the threat? And not lowering it was the offer on the table?

    We’ll keep your AAA rating if you stop this particular investigation…

  35. 35.

    El Cid

    August 18, 2011 at 5:09 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: This Ferengi comparison is completely unfair, to the Ferengi.

    As far as I recall, the Ferengi system was indeed devoted to the principle of the continued existence of the Ferengi system, because without it, profit was impossible.

    Today’s corporate and investor leadership would be considered dangerous unprincipled radicals by the Ferengi.

  36. 36.

    OmerosPeanut

    August 18, 2011 at 9:16 pm

    I think it would be more accurate to say: “Shorter NYT: ‘Some say 2+2=5. Others disagree.'” That way the benefit of the doubt is given to those peddling horsesh*t.

  37. 37.

    Ian

    August 18, 2011 at 9:44 pm

    I found this to be an interesting link

    We are now in S and Ps AA+ group with Belgium and New Zealand. quite frankly I do not see how we belong on a group with such varied ratings and dept ratios. Belgium is on par with us, New Zealand has only 30percent. However we are on scale with Greeece, Ireland, Portugal, and Spain. These countries are experiencing massive default and credit problems. Is it really a wonder that we have been downgraded?

    Interesting sidenote. Compare the CIA’s analyses of our Debt with the IMFs analyses. The CIA says we only have 60% of our economy as debt. I thought we had a 15trillion dollar economy and a similar sized debt, as the IMF says. Anyone care to explain this too me?

  38. 38.

    Ian

    August 18, 2011 at 9:46 pm

    Ahh wont let me edit! the link didnt work

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_by_public_debt

    Link

  39. 39.

    Tom

    August 19, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    Retaliation or not, it is time to held the rating agencies accountable. It is not acceptable for so much power to be concentrated in the hands of such few companies and let them dictate government policies.

  40. 40.

    Charles Frith

    August 20, 2011 at 7:54 am

    MattF regurgitates what he is instructed to think.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • eclare on On The Road – knally – Shropshire Hills (Mar 31, 2023 @ 5:46am)
  • J R in WV on The Funniest Thing About All of This (Mar 31, 2023 @ 5:42am)
  • sab on On The Road – knally – Shropshire Hills (Mar 31, 2023 @ 5:31am)
  • Anne Laurie on Late Night Open Thread: Binancing the Susceptible (Mar 31, 2023 @ 5:12am)
  • sab on Late Night Open Thread: Binancing the Susceptible (Mar 31, 2023 @ 4:50am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!