• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

Every decision we make has lots of baggage with it, known or unknown.

“Facilitate” is an active verb, not a weasel word.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

Second rate reporter says what?

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

The revolution will be supervised.

Innocent people do not delay justice.

Every one of the “Roberts Six” lied to get on the court.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Jesus watching the most hateful people claiming to be his followers

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Giving up is unforgivable.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Republican also-rans: four mules fighting over a turnip.

Petty moves from a petty man.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

The only way through is to slog through the muck one step at at time.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Witless For The Defense, Your Honor

Witless For The Defense, Your Honor

by Zandar|  October 5, 20119:21 am| 27 Comments

This post is in: I Read These Morons So You Don't Have To

FacebookTweetEmail

New guy gets to handle the “I Read These Morons So You Don’t Have To” category, right? And hey, this time it’s easy, it’s really pretty much all there in Bobo’s article title:

In Defense of Romney

And it goes precisely as you expect it would.

The central problem is that Mitt Romney doesn’t fit the mold of what many Republicans want in a presidential candidate. They don’t want a technocratic manager. They want a bold, blunt radical outsider who will take on the establishment, speak truth to power and offend the liberal news media.

They don’t want Organization Man. They want Braveheart.

The question is: Are they right to want this? Well, if they want an in-your-face media campaign that will produce delicious thrills for the true believers, they are absolutely right. But if they actually want to elect an effective executive who is right for this moment, they are probably not right.

If that sounds familiar, it should.  Please notice that Bobo’s recycling his own argument as to why he liked candidate Obama in 2008.

And the other thing that does separate Obama from just a pure intellectual: he has tremendous powers of social perception. And this is why he’s a politician, not an academic. A couple of years ago, I was writing columns attacking the Republican congress for spending too much money. And I throw in a few sentences attacking the Democrats to make myself feel better. And one morning I get an email from Obama saying, ‘David, if you wanna attack us, fine, but you’re only throwing in those sentences to make yourself feel better.’ And it was a perfect description of what was going through my mind. And everybody who knows Obama all have these stories to tell about his capacity for social perception.

He then goes on to praise Romney for just how much like President Obama he is: perceptive, organized, intelligent, possessed of political expertise, surrounded by competent people and adaptable to a changing political situation.  The funny thing is President Obama is still all of those things, still has gotten a hell of a lot done, still has a lot that he can do, but Bobo here seems to think that Romney’s good for America in the end because he’s dull (and of course the Tea Party would magically go away if President Obama weren’t around.)

It’s like watching paint dry.  Unexciting, nondescript, especially boring paint.

<object style=”height: 390px; width: 640px”><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/ussCHoQttyQ?version=3″><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”><param name=”allowScriptAccess” value=”always”><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/ussCHoQttyQ?version=3″ type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowfullscreen=”true” allowScriptAccess=”always” width=”640″ height=”360″></object>

Now that I think about it, if there’s anyone in DC that will relentless push the idea of “Mitt Romney means we get to have a grown-up in the White House and no Tea Party!” fallacy for the next 13 months, it’s going to be Brooks.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The Cool Kids are Changing Lunch Tables
Next Post: Given what’s happened, do we really want to (once again) rush to deregulate? »

Reader Interactions

27Comments

  1. 1.

    Corner Stone

    October 5, 2011 at 9:32 am

    If there’s anything I enjoy more than not reading Brooks once, it’s not reading Brooks twice.

  2. 2.

    mass

    October 5, 2011 at 9:34 am

    You think we’ll ever see such signs on Wall Street:

    “The tree of liberty must be watered at times with the blood of bankers…or wanker/winger/”centrist” NYT columnists.”

  3. 3.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    October 5, 2011 at 9:39 am

    The central problem is that Mitt Romney doesn’t fit the mold of what many Republicans want in a presidential candidate.

    Yeah, he’s not Christian.

  4. 4.

    TooManyJens

    October 5, 2011 at 10:02 am

    I can’t think of anything Republicans want *less* than a candidate who will speak truth to power. Their entire party is an exercise in propping up existing power and/or hoping they will be the ones with power over the rest of us one day.

  5. 5.

    Gilles de Rais

    October 5, 2011 at 10:05 am

    (and of course the Tea Party would magically go away if President Obama weren’t around.)

    But this is true. Without the presence of an angry Kenyan Marxist Black Panther in the White House, the unemployables, old people, shortwave listeners and militia crowd that comprise the band of vermin known as the “tea party” would promptly disband and go back to terrorizing pharmacy employees and Social Security workers. They’ve got better things to do, these folks, and most of those things involve television.

  6. 6.

    Gilles de Rais

    October 5, 2011 at 10:14 am

    why am I in moderation?

  7. 7.

    Feudalism Now!

    October 5, 2011 at 10:19 am

    The money that funded the Tea Party would dry up with an R in the WH. The mainstream republicans would be moved back to Ronaldus Magnus’ big tent and the fringe would return to the wilds. The mob is only needed to keep the GOP from cooperating or compromising. Unless the professional goopers, start an uncharacteristic swing to moderation while in power, what good is the tea party?
    Plus, Romney is part of the 1%, he isn’t going to buck his buddies.

  8. 8.

    MattF

    October 5, 2011 at 10:19 am

    Back in the old days, Brooks would have been tagged as a ‘fellow traveler’. He’s bright, he writes engagingly, he sometimes has a good idea– but when push comes to shove, he follows the party line.

    For the record, there is no such animal as an ‘apolitical’ politician. You may think that giraffe over there would be prettier if it had a short neck and lived underwater, but then… it wouldn’t be a giraffe.

  9. 9.

    J

    October 5, 2011 at 10:29 am

    This is the bit that makes one wonder if Brooks has taken leave of his senses (or much, much more likely isn’t an utterly dishonest propagandist).

    Whoever wins the nomination will be leading a party with a cohesive ideology and a common set of priorities: reform taxes, replace Obamacare, cut spending and reform entitlements. The next president won’t have to come up with a vision, just execute the things almost all Republicans agree upon.

    ‘replace’ and ‘reform’ are up there with sonder Behandlung as euphemisms; likewise ‘speak truth to power’ singled out by ToomanyJenns above, which in this context can only mean ‘lick the boots of those with power and money while lying on their behalf’.

  10. 10.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    October 5, 2011 at 10:29 am

    There were lots of good comments about this article here.

  11. 11.

    J

    October 5, 2011 at 10:38 am

    @Bill E Pilgrim: True, but who can begrudge a man or a woman to get in a little more Brooks-bashing?

  12. 12.

    Corner Stone

    October 5, 2011 at 10:39 am

    @Bill E Pilgrim: I thought about saying it, since Cole’s take was essentially the same and used fewer words. But then I thought, meh, new guy doesn’t read this blog either just like every other FP’er.

  13. 13.

    Corner Stone

    October 5, 2011 at 10:41 am

    Good Lord, the doctor in the Michael Jackson case had some beautiful freakin’ girlfriends. Damnation.

  14. 14.

    Anonne

    October 5, 2011 at 10:42 am

    Now that I think about it, if there’s anyone in DC that will relentless push the idea of “Mitt Romney means we get to have a grown-up in the White House and no Tea Party!” fallacy for the next 13 months, it’s going to be Brooks.

    You should also watch David Frum. He’s a little more fascinating to read, as he finally starts to understand Paul Krugman.

  15. 15.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    October 5, 2011 at 11:14 am

    New guy gets to handle the “I Read These Morons So You Don’t Have To” category, right?

    For some reason this reminds me of a joke about a lumberjack camp out in the North Woods whose punchline ends with “…and the bad news is, tonight is your night in the barrel”.

  16. 16.

    Morzer

    October 5, 2011 at 11:15 am

    ROMNEY: I don’t recall whether this soldier, whether people were booing his question or just booing…
    UNION LEADER: They booed as soon as he identified as a gay person.
    ROMNEY: You have to look at that. I don’t know when they booed and I don’t know why they booed. But I will tell you, that the boos and applause hasn’t always coincided with my own views, but I haven’t stepped in to try and say, ‘this one is right, this one is wrong.’ Instead, I focus on the things I think I will say.
    UNION LEADER: I ask because Herman Cain over the weekend was asked about it and he said in effect that he should have criticized whoever was booing in the audience.
    ROMNEY: That’s…I understand his thoughts.

    So much for our fearless wannabe leader of the free world. Trust David Brooks to raise the banner of “Wafflers of the World Unite You Have Nothing But Your Self-Respect To Lose”.

    http://www.c-span.org/Events/Romney-Speaks-to-New-Hampshire-Union-Leader-Editors/10737424518/

  17. 17.

    Bruce S

    October 5, 2011 at 11:41 am

    A: What is this pathetic schmuck’s option other than to cling to Romney’s empty suit?

    B: The “boredom defense” might well be considered a form of tepid self-regard in the case of Brooks.

  18. 18.

    Southern Beale

    October 5, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    New York Magazine has the best piece yet on Mitt Romney:

    They Don’t Like You, Mitt. They Really Don’t Like You.

    Makes some really good points and also makes the point I’ve been saying, which is that everyone’s desperation to find someone — ANYONE — besides Romney would have sent lesser mortals into a steep depression.

  19. 19.

    ruemara

    October 5, 2011 at 12:50 pm

    This gives those who are nominally Democratic leaning an out. That’s who David Brooks is, the soothing mellow voice of conservativism. Sure, the advent of the Tea Party brought the secret pile of crazy freak out and now, you don’t want to vote for one. But wait, here’s Mellow Repub Gold! The Velvet Hack, David Brooks, to reassure you that you can vote for Romney, he’s just a white Obama. Romney isn’t so bad, he’s reasonable. He’ll be MORE bipartisan than the failed Obama.

    I know a number of leftier than thou types who can be counted on to bring this op ed up as yet another reason why they will not vote for Obama in 2012. Yes, I know they are left, they will vote Republican. It’s their choice. Cognitive dissonance is not just for breakfast any more.

  20. 20.

    jd spellchecka

    October 5, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    just a bit ot…perhaps this is an internet joke, but the neutral response video has recieved a neutral response at youtube….24,642 likes, 24,642 dislikes

  21. 21.

    dj spellchecka

    October 5, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    a bit ot, but the neutral response video has gotten a neutral response at youtube “24,642 likes…24,642 dislikes”

  22. 22.

    Kilkee

    October 5, 2011 at 1:04 pm

    @ruemara: “The Velvet Hack” is a winnah!

  23. 23.

    JWL

    October 5, 2011 at 1:26 pm

    “I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there and in some ways it was frustrating not to feel like I was there as part of the troops that were fighting in Vietnam.”

    – Mitt Romney, Boston Globe, 6/24/07

    “I was not planning on signing up for the military. It was not my desire to go off and serve in Vietnam.”

    – Mitt Romney, Boston Herald, 5/2/94

  24. 24.

    Elie

    October 5, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    @ruemara:

    Thats all well and good as long as Romney keeps his mouth shut. Problem is that the campaign season has barely begun and he still has managed to put foot in mouth when there is relatively little at stake. This guy aint never EVAH going to make it through a full throttle campaign season under enormous scrutiny and stress. The separation between his brain and mouth already evident, will be unbridgeable. In other words, the difference between him and Obama is going to be the Grand Canyon and there will be not amount of dreaming and fantasizing by Brooks or anyone else who will mitigate that.

  25. 25.

    Bruce S

    October 5, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    Surprising turn of events – a numbingly insipid Brooks column is followed the very next day by an equally clueless and incoherent Thomas Friedman column…

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/05/opinion/friedman-no-christie-no-bargain.html?hp

    In other news…we had weather.

  26. 26.

    Triassic Sands

    October 5, 2011 at 5:38 pm

    Wow, Barack Obama’s incredible social perception told him Bobo was a fraud and a hypocrite. Amazing. Truly amazing. He probably has ESP and telekinetic powers too, because no one without supernatural powers would ever guess that Bobo is a fraud and a hypocrite. Unless, of course, they read one of his columns.

    Obama may or may not have great social perception, but he certainly didn’t need it to see through Bobo.

  27. 27.

    Shlemizel

    October 5, 2011 at 8:47 pm

    I couldn’t think of a ‘better’ follow up to the Obama administration than Mitt. You can almost hear the rapidly increase swirling sound of the country going down the toilet.

    We can only hope that occupy wall street helps enough Dems to find their sacks and finally come around to working for the majority of Americans.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Deputinize America - Moorea 2024 2
Image by Deputinize America (7/14/25)
Donate

Recent Comments

  • Gloria DryGarden on Dinging Dear Leader Open Thread: Sportsball Diversion / Division (Jul 14, 2025 @ 11:33pm)
  • Jackie on Monday Night Open Thread (Jul 14, 2025 @ 11:32pm)
  • Ohio Mom on Monday Night Open Thread (Jul 14, 2025 @ 11:31pm)
  • Gloria DryGarden on Dinging Dear Leader Open Thread: Sportsball Diversion / Division (Jul 14, 2025 @ 11:29pm)
  • Gloria DryGarden on Dinging Dear Leader Open Thread: Sportsball Diversion / Division (Jul 14, 2025 @ 11:28pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!