• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

As long as McCarthy is Speaker, the House will never be in order.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

Fani Willis claps back at Trump chihuahua, Jim Jordan.

“Cheese and Kraken paired together for the appetizer trial.”

Glad to see john eastman going through some things.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Thanks for reminding me that Van Jones needs to be slapped.

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

Trump’s legal defense is going to be a dumpster fire inside a clown car on a derailing train.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

There is no compromise when it comes to body autonomy. You either have it or you don’t.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

The willow is too close to the house.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / Lindsey Graham: “Let’s Get In on The Ground”

Lindsey Graham: “Let’s Get In on The Ground”

by Anne Laurie|  October 21, 20113:56 pm| 58 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs, Lindsey Graham's Fee Fees, Republican Venality, Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail

__
Via Charlie Pierce, Think Progress transcribes Lindsay Graham on Fox News, going for the gusto:

“… If we could have kept American air power in the fight it would have been over quicker. Sixty-thousand Libyans have been wounded, 3,000 maimed, 25,000 killed. Let’s get in on the ground. There is a lot of money to be made in the future in Libya. Lot of oil to be produced. Let’s get on the ground and help the Libyan people establish a democracy and a functioning economy based on free market principles.”

__

I can’t top Mr. Pierce’s summary at Esquire‘s Political Blog of Sen. Embarrassment to America:

… Senator Huckleberry Grabitall is an impatient fellow. There’s oil under them corpses, and it’s by god our oil, so we should just go in and drink that damn milkshake before our plucky allies decide that, just because it’s under their sand, they have some sort of legal right to the stuff. Sorry so many of them got killed — Psst! A lot more of them would have been alive if Mighty Man Me had been running things — but we’re past all that now. Sweep ’em aside and let’s go to work….
__
You know what? The United States has “a government based on free-market principles” like the one Huckleberry is recommending. Dammit, I think the Libyans can do better.

“Too small for a republic, too large for an insane asylum.” Forget the Palmetto Republic, we’re talking about Lindsey Graham’s ego.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « President Obama has written personal checks to those in need while Republicans continue to do jacksquat
Next Post: Almost there »

Reader Interactions

58Comments

  1. 1.

    The Dangerman

    October 21, 2011 at 4:01 pm

    I don’t know why we should concern ourselves with Libyan oil; we have 300 years of energy under our feet if we’d only just drill (using Halliburton as the contractor, of course).

    /rick rolling us

  2. 2.

    lamh34

    October 21, 2011 at 4:03 pm

    I hope to never hear liberal-minded people say that Mittens wouldn’t be that bad as POTUS (believe me, I’ve heard it from people I expected better of):

    Romney: Mission not accomplished

    Romney statement: President Obama’s astonishing failure to secure an orderly transition in Iraq has unnecessarily put at risk the victories that were won through the blood and sacrifice of thousands of American men and women. The unavoidable question is whether this decision is the result of a naked political calculation or simply sheer ineptitude in negotiations with the Iraqi government. The American people deserve to hear the recommendations that were made by our military commanders in Iraq.

    It’s a short step from here, though, to a dangerous political place: Romney wants to keep the troops in Iraq.

  3. 3.

    Jack

    October 21, 2011 at 4:03 pm

    Obama to Graham: “Thanks for the political cover. Chavez next?”

  4. 4.

    kindness

    October 21, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    How come none of the big MSM has come out and said how embarrassed they are by the statements of Republicans lately? I mean they have seriously come out with some god awful stuff.

  5. 5.

    Mnemosyne

    October 21, 2011 at 4:09 pm

    @Jack:

    I hadn’t heard about the massive popular uprising in Venezuela against Chavez where the UN passed a resolution asking NATO to intervene because Chavez was hiring mercenaries to fight against his own people when his army refused to back him up. Do you have links?

  6. 6.

    Spaghetti Lee

    October 21, 2011 at 4:11 pm

    Sheesh, Lindsey, buy ’em dinner first, why don’t ya?

  7. 7.

    JenJen

    October 21, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    Wait a minute… from the transcript:

    Let’s get in on the ground. There is a lot of money to be made in the future in Libya. Lot of oil to be produced. Let’s get on the ground and help the Libyan people establish a democracy and a functioning economy based on free market principles.

    Is Lindsey suggesting that we Americans chip in and help Libya with their infrastructure? Ummmm… what about our infrastructure?

  8. 8.

    r€nato

    October 21, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    shorter Graham: “Stimulus and jobs for Libyans, but not for Americans until they overthrow the socialist African tyrant Obama.”

  9. 9.

    Temporarily Max McGee (soon enough to be Andy K again)

    October 21, 2011 at 4:15 pm

    I’ll give the Firebaggers this: Unlike they’re Republican allies, who were also quite vocally opposed to any US intervention in Libya, the lefties aren’t now involved in revising the history of this affair.

  10. 10.

    cleek

    October 21, 2011 at 4:15 pm

    free market = bomb em, take it, shake yr ass!

  11. 11.

    The Moar You Know

    October 21, 2011 at 4:17 pm

    @lamh34: Romney can and will and should bitch about what the public is shortly going to realize – that we lost in Iraq and lost big. He’s hoping to tap into the forthcoming burst of public rage over that realization. He will succeed.

    Not Obama’s fault, but it doesn’t matter. We got tossed out of Iraq on his watch (and the timing on that deal that Bush signed was quite deliberate) so he’ll be the guy that “lost Iraq” forever.

  12. 12.

    No One of Consequence

    October 21, 2011 at 4:18 pm

    Morally bankrupt was a term that used to concern me.

    Now, I think it lacks the ‘oomph’ requisite to accurately reflect my opinion of the Pubs.

    For FSM’s sake, don’t they realize at some point, someone, somewhere is going to use the intertubes to come up with an actual talking picture of them saying this outrageous bullshit?

    Can’t wait for the 2012 ads…

    Fade in from black.

    Closeup of Obama’s face.

    “I am President Barack Obama, and I approve wholeheartedly and unequivocally of the following message.”

    Ken Burns-esque shot of an irate picture of Romney. Bulging eyes would be good.

    Superimposed quote over the foaming at the mouth picture. text: “Mitt Romney stated (then show every date you can find where he stated it), ‘Let the Auto Companies fail’.

    Fade in statistic of the total employment picture in regards to all of the tangentally related auto jobs, I expect this to be millions of jobs.

    Show the increases of auto business, the additional hiring, building plants, etc.

    Fade out. 2 second pause.

    Fade back in in red, “Let them fail. – Mitt Romney”.

    Fade to black.

    That’s it.

    Peace,

    – NOoC

  13. 13.

    Mike Goetz

    October 21, 2011 at 4:19 pm

    I literally cannot believe that a U.S. Senator would be comfortable saying this on television.

    Between this and Romney’s statement…I don’t know, something has broken down, and I want to say “decorum” but it’s deeper than that.

  14. 14.

    soonergrunt

    October 21, 2011 at 4:19 pm

    @Temporarily Max McGee (soon enough to be Andy K again): No. The stupid motherfuckers do want to invent whole new categories of war crimes out of whole cloth for it, though.

  15. 15.

    Jenny

    October 21, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    Drill Baby, Drill!

  16. 16.

    Triassic Sands

    October 21, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    There is a lot of money to be made in the future in Libya.

    F U C K Y O U, Senator Graham. Just F U C K Y O U.

    Note: I don’t remember the last time I wrote “fuck” online, but there simply is no other response to this self-righteous POS.

  17. 17.

    Felinious Wench

    October 21, 2011 at 4:23 pm

    Let’s get in on the ground. There is a lot of money to be made in the future in Libya.

    Hey! Finally, a Republican stimulus plan!

  18. 18.

    Jenny

    October 21, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    @Temporarily Max McGee (soon enough to be Andy K again):

    the lefties aren’t now involved in revising the history of this affair.

    They don’t have to revise, they already started out with loony toon narratives: “it’s all about the oil”, “it’s an endless war”, “it’s another Iraq/VietNam”, “Impeach HIM!”.

    I mean seriously, even the fucking wingers weren’t calling for his impeachment.

  19. 19.

    handy

    October 21, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    Repubs: for it before and after they were against it. Or something. Hold on lemme find out what Rush is saying.

  20. 20.

    trollhattan

    October 21, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    I was wondering why Graham was chiding congressional Republicans yesterday for not supporting Obama on Libya. I guess he was just teeing up the ol’ Freedom Ball(tm) to take a swing today.

    Nice.

  21. 21.

    Turgidson

    October 21, 2011 at 4:29 pm

    When was the last time a prominent Republican was right about something (anything)?

    I’m honestly having trouble thinking of anything.

  22. 22.

    slag

    October 21, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    There is a lot of money to be made in the future in Libya. Lot of oil to be produced. Let’s get on the ground and help the Libyan people establish a democracy and a functioning economy based on free market principles.

    Yes yes! And we’ll name it…Iraq 2.0: if at first you don’t succeed.

  23. 23.

    david mizner

    October 21, 2011 at 4:35 pm

    He’s just being honest. You’re not supposed to say this stuff out loud, but if you don’t think American multinational corps aren’t angling to make score bigtime blood money right now in Libya…

  24. 24.

    lamh34

    October 21, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    I think the Obama re-election campaign are ready for any of the GOP nominee, but they expect it to be Romney. But I’m noticing that the campaign aint’ going all out on Romney yet, but when they do, they aren’t giving soft hit either.

    From Greg Sargent on twitter:

    Obama campaign: “Romney’s foreign policy experience is limited to his work as a finance executive shipping American jobs overseas.”

    http://twitter.com/#!/ThePlumLineGS/status/127482198835204096

    From BenSmith @politico:

    Obama spox @BenLaBolt: Romney “apparently willing to leave American troops [in Iraq] without identifying a new mission.”

    http://twitter.com/#!/benpolitico/status/127482316871307264

    I think the re-election campaign are obviously more ready than we think. Just biding their time.

  25. 25.

    Morzer

    October 21, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    Couldn’t we just ship the GOP and their supporters to Libya, airlift out the current population and give them say… South Carolina instead? That way, the crazies get to drill for all the oil their little hearts desire, while moving closer to their Somalian dream, we massively improve the craziest state in the Union, and everyone ought to be happy.

  26. 26.

    Shawn in ShowMe

    October 21, 2011 at 4:38 pm

    Lindsey Graham makes J.R. Ewing look like Tony Nelson.

  27. 27.

    slag

    October 21, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    Along the lines of war, I just have to say how disappointed I am at not having read about this: http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/10/21/the-front-lines-of-punditry here. Most hilarious thing I’ve seen in quite a long time.

    Get better soon, JC! The front lines of punditry need you!

  28. 28.

    JC

    October 21, 2011 at 4:44 pm

    Let’s get in on the ground. There is a lot of money to be made in the future in Libya. Lot of oil to be produced.

    Well, SOME COUNTRY OR OTHER, is going to get in on the ground floor. There is no denying that.

    Why not the U.S.?

    There is a deal to be made – are we quick enough, flexible enough to make it, or will we allow Britian, France, China, to swoop in and steal our thunder?

    Look – someone’s gonna grift! Why not U.S.?

  29. 29.

    Meg

    October 21, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    @JenJen: What he meant is like what they have been doing to all those third world countries, having the multinational contractors, often invested by US officials and friends, going there to build things that would be paid for by forcing the said country to borrow money from the IMF or World Bank with the conditions that the country would have a complete free market and free trade system, no pesky government regulations of any sort. This way it will be the multinational corporations that would make money and not the citizens of the country.
    This is a formula they’ve used over and over again to screw other countries.

  30. 30.

    slag

    October 21, 2011 at 4:49 pm

    @JC: You are not the JC I was looking for. You appear to be the JC that doesn’t learn from people’s mistakes.

  31. 31.

    JC

    October 21, 2011 at 4:53 pm

    @slag:

    Heh, what’s funny is, I didn’t see your comment, so in no way was I responding to your prior comment. Just one of those happenstance things.

    I’m being tongue in cheek in my reply, but as a serious matter – I do think some country or other is going to come in and grift for their home grown corporations. It’s the way of the world. Very unfortunately.

  32. 32.

    CynDee

    October 21, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    Lindsey Graham is a vulture. One of many; nothing in particular to distinguish him from the rest, except he’s more stupid than some.

    “Let’s get in on the ground”

    Everybody who votes for Lindsey to Go In On The Ground send a dollar for his one-way ticket.

  33. 33.

    Spaghetti Lee

    October 21, 2011 at 4:59 pm

    @The Moar You Know:

    We got tossed out of Iraq on his watch (and the timing on that deal that Bush signed was quite deliberate) so he’ll be the guy that “lost Iraq” forever.

    But aren’t most people sick of Iraq anyway? I thought I saw a poll a while back that said the majority of Americans want the troops home. If Romney wants to plump for war like it’s 2003 again, fine by me, but I don’t think he’ll find much public support.

  34. 34.

    soonergrunt

    October 21, 2011 at 5:00 pm

    I think President Obama should publicly offer Lindsay Graham the position of Ambassador to Libya.

  35. 35.

    Mike E

    October 21, 2011 at 5:04 pm

    This is, of course, good for Sen. McCain

  36. 36.

    slag

    October 21, 2011 at 5:07 pm

    @JC:

    Heh, what’s funny is, I didn’t see your comment, so in no way was I responding to your prior comment.

    I didn’t assume you were.

    I do think some country or other is going to come in and grift for their home grown corporations.

    No sane person should assume that the US is just going to leave Libya to its own devices. Have we ever left any country to its own devices? But the diplomatic path does not run through Faux News and on to gleefully exclaiming your grift intentions. That is moronic.

  37. 37.

    Jenny

    October 21, 2011 at 5:10 pm

    @soonergrunt: He won’t accept, there’s not enough gay night clubs in Tripoli.

  38. 38.

    JenJen

    October 21, 2011 at 5:13 pm

    @Meg: Ohhhhhhh. Well that sounds absolutely scam-tastic. Lindsey Graham is a douchecanoe.

  39. 39.

    piratedan

    October 21, 2011 at 5:14 pm

    sounds like Lindsey needs to be our point man in Mogadishu…. plenty of opportunity there for a fella with a sparkle in his eye and a mind for business.

  40. 40.

    soonergrunt

    October 21, 2011 at 5:16 pm

    @Jenny: ohhh, burn.

  41. 41.

    Mnemosyne

    October 21, 2011 at 5:16 pm

    @The Moar You Know:

    Romney can and will and should bitch about what the public is shortly going to realize – that we lost in Iraq and lost big. He’s hoping to tap into the forthcoming burst of public rage over that realization. He will succeed.

    How do you figure? The war in Iraq is extremely unpopular and has been since well before Bush left office. I really don’t see a huge upswing of patriotic fervor in its favor just because we’re finally leaving.

  42. 42.

    darkmatter

    October 21, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    @JenJen: Republicans/GOP: Country First… Unless Its The United States.

  43. 43.

    Rommie

    October 21, 2011 at 5:38 pm

    I wonder how the folks who were praising Britain and France for their leadership will feel when said countries get first dibs on the bubbling crude. My guess is some combination of butt and hurt.

  44. 44.

    GregB

    October 21, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    I’m listening to my sketchy voiced Senator Ayotte declaring that we must keep American’s in Iraq.

    What a fucking tool.

  45. 45.

    Kathy in St. Louis

    October 21, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    Someone needs to explain to Lindsey that since we have so few working in this country, we don’t need so much stinkin’ oil. With industry in the tank, with the Republicans making certain that no jobs are created before the next election to assure their win, oil ain’t so important.

  46. 46.

    CarolDuhart

    October 21, 2011 at 5:44 pm

    @Mnemosyne: Not only that, but the leaving will be quiet and orderly. No big scramble like Vietnam, which is when the geopolitical ideas of the Republican Party have stopped developing and stopped being relevant. I envision the last soldiers coming out like this:

    New Years Eve: the last troops are on tv standing around with their gear and a bottle of hoarded champagne at the Iraqi border. The minute they cross the Iraqi border at midnight, they stop, open up the champagne, toast in front of the cameras, and with the one troop that isn’t tipsy, head to the plane for that great ride home. That’s the end of it all.

    Meanwhile behind them, there’s gunfire, but it’s not directed at anyone. It’s Iraqis firing in the air, setting off firecrackers, and banging pots and pans in celebration of the end of the war.

    Poor Romney. Hoping for chaos he won’t get.

  47. 47.

    Mnemosyne

    October 21, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    @CarolDuhart:

    Yeah, I just don’t see scenes like this or this happening as the US leaves Baghdad. Without those, the Republicans are going to have a hard time selling the notion that our leaving Iraq was a bad idea.

  48. 48.

    russ

    October 21, 2011 at 5:56 pm

    saw this earlier at work and…

    President Graham, upon election can direct his own foriegn policy and until then…STFU

  49. 49.

    El Cid

    October 21, 2011 at 5:56 pm

    Given our long and successful experience establishing democracy elsewhere and the stellar management of things [at home], it’s no wonder Libya’s new leaders are interested in various types of US aid but not “assistance” in how to set up a democracy.

  50. 50.

    CarolDuhart

    October 21, 2011 at 6:10 pm

    @Mnemosyne: And after 10 years and 10 weeks of withdrawal, there will be few left to make such a scene even plausible. Over the next month there will be a scramble to get home before Thanksgiving, the remaining crowd before Christmas: after December 25 a race to leave before New Year’s Eve. On the 31st of December, the only folks left will be a handful of absolutely necessary personnel and those going to work at the Embassy.

  51. 51.

    Suffern ACE

    October 21, 2011 at 6:13 pm

    Somebody needs to tell the new Libyan government that they are sitting on a lot of oil that needs to be developed. Post haste. I’m sure they didn’t even know their country was a member of OPEC. I bet they thought they were the chief wine exporting country. That’s how dumb the Libyans are. <>

  52. 52.

    Suffern ACE

    October 21, 2011 at 6:22 pm

    @GregB:

    What for? Whatever for? What the fuck for? Why?

    There are just so many ways to ask that follow up question. I bet it gets asked “0” times.

    If I was following Blitzer correctly, we need to be worried about “So many unanswered questions about the future of Iraq.” (Although he didn’t say what the questions were). I guess his magic 8 ball isn’t working since I think everythings been wrapped up and answered sufficiently.

    No loose ends. Series jumped the shark, ratings in the tank for awhile. I don’t even think there’s a need to have a movie with the original stars in a few years to please what remaining fans this invasion has at this point.

  53. 53.

    Jinxtigr

    October 21, 2011 at 6:36 pm

    Naomi Klein, “The Shock Doctrine”.
    Gratituously, hideously right about all this.
    The wonder is that they are so brazen about it, but I doubt they even register how shocking they’re being- and the backlash is already well in place. This isn’t the world it was ten years ago, when these people truly ruled.

  54. 54.

    Origuy

    October 21, 2011 at 7:05 pm

    If Halliburton or Bechtel or whoever wants to go after rebuilding Libya’s infrastructure, more power to them. But why does the US government have to be involved? Surely the invisible hand of the market works in Libya, too. As far as the oil is concerned, once things settle down, it will be flowing as fast as it was under Ghaddafi, with or without us. Since oil is fungible, the price won’t change whether it goes to BP, Shell, or Exxon. Of course, to Republicans, the entire focus of US foreign policy should be whatever benefits multi-national corporations.

  55. 55.

    chrome agnomen

    October 21, 2011 at 8:46 pm

    amazing how quick lindsay is with the libya casualty figures, meanwhile, in iraq, every iraqi casualty figure was grossly overblown, nobody could know for sure, etc.

  56. 56.

    Gilles de Rais

    October 21, 2011 at 8:49 pm

    Getting out of an unpopular war and being labeled as having lost that war are two entirely different things. I would have thought that those of you who lived through Vietnam would have understood that.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. The Mahablog » Whimpers says:
    October 21, 2011 at 5:49 pm

    […] Annie Laurie, here is a partial transcript: If we could have kept American air power in the fight it would have […]

  2. Whimpers | My Blog says:
    October 26, 2011 at 7:50 am

    […] Annie Laurie, here is a partial transcript: If we could have kept American air power in the fight it would have […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Jim, Foolish Literalist on Biden Announces American Climate Corps (Sep 21, 2023 @ 11:51am)
  • The Kropenhagen Interpretation on Biden Announces American Climate Corps (Sep 21, 2023 @ 11:49am)
  • Yarrow on Challenges of paying monthly? (Sep 21, 2023 @ 11:47am)
  • NotMax on Biden Announces American Climate Corps (Sep 21, 2023 @ 11:46am)
  • Kelly on Challenges of paying monthly? (Sep 21, 2023 @ 11:43am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!