• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans choose power over democracy, every day.

We can show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

People really shouldn’t expect the government to help after they watched the GOP drown it in a bathtub.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

“The defense has a certain level of trust in defendant that the government does not.”

Bark louder, little dog.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

The revolution will be supervised.

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Since we are repeating ourselves, let me just say fuck that.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Human rights are not a matter of opinion!

Relentless negativity is not a sign that you are more realistic.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

Of course you can have champagne before noon. That’s why orange juice was invented.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

Radicalized white males who support Trump are pitching a tent in the abyss.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Elections / Election 2012 / Open Thread: Debate Death March

Open Thread: Debate Death March

by Anne Laurie|  October 21, 20113:57 am| 35 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012, Open Threads, Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

The NYTimes informs us that Fox news will be sponsoring two additional debates, “adding to an already packed schedule of face-offs“, as the Grey Lady delicately phrases it. Possibly Fox, as the first NYTimes commentor suggests, has decided that “Are Any of the GOP Candidates Smarter Than A Fifth Grader?” is cheaper to produce and/or draws more viewers than its current reality show line-up. On the other hand, perhaps Roger Ailes’ underlings are worried that whichever one of the existing GOP-candidate pool “wins” the chance to run against President Obama may not only reverse the infamous 1984 Reagan-Mondale landslide, but destroy the entire Republican party, and so they’re grabbing whatever grift remains before the final train wreck.

Either way, I’m using it as an excuse to link to Gail Collins on the latest debate-debacle, because I agree that poor Seamus Romney must never be forgotten:

… This week’s debate was a triumph for Perry, who not only put Romney on the defensive, but did it in complete sentences. He did get lost in the weeds during a discussion of Romney’s Mormonism. (“And this country is based on, as Newt talked about, these values that are so important as we go forward, and the idea that we should not have our freedom of religion, to be taken away by any means.”)
__
The whole First Amendment thing might be a little complicated for a governor whose State Constitution prohibits anyone who doesn’t believe in God from holding public office. This is not a joke.
__
But about Mitt Romney and the landscapers. This is the story: In 2006, The Boston Globe reported that the yard of then-Governor Romney’s family home was being groomed by a landscaping firm with a history of using undocumented workers. The team of reporters, led by Jonathan Saltzman and Maria Cramer, tracked down people in Guatemala who recounted fond memories of their years of clipping the Romney grass without the requisite immigration papers.
__
There was quite a bit of grass to clip. The family lived in an affluent Boston suburb in a house on two-and-a-half acres, with a pool and a tennis court. Not as fancy as the $12 million beachfront pad the Romneys are currently renovating in California, but it was home….
__
Interestingly, though, Romney kept using the same service until a year later when he fired them after The Globe did a follow-up. (“Lawn Work at Romney’s Home Still Done by Illegal Immigrants.”)
__
What do you think took him so long? Was he distracted by the pressure of preparing for the 2007-8 season of presidential debates, during which Romney accused Rudy Giuliani of making New York a “sanctuary city,” Mike Huckabee of supporting “in-state benefits for illegal immigrants” and McCain of pushing “amnesty”?
__
Also, how was the paperless worker that Mitt ordered off the property transported away?
__
If a crate on the roof plays any part in this story, we are going to be really, really disturbed.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread
Next Post: Slow Learners are Learning »

Reader Interactions

35Comments

  1. 1.

    amk

    October 21, 2011 at 4:04 am

    mittens wishes that crate on that car roof had that faux texan cowboy inside it.

    At this rate, cage fights cannot be ruled out.

  2. 2.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    October 21, 2011 at 4:38 am

    Meh. Romney is going to lose next year for reasons that have nothing to do with any of this, namely the harmonic convergence of the takeover of the party by its most extreme and virulent rabid core, emerging like a herpes outbreak to embarrass all of them and remind everyone that it’s there, and the more conservative (in the older sense of the word) establishment Republican contingent who were slow to realize that their cynical experiments had escaped from the lab and overreacted with the second most bland candidate they possibly could. I can’t even remember who the most bland one was — he was that good.

    Choosing Mitt Romney is kind of like treating an ulcer by pouring milk on it; it’s outdated, it ignores the actual root problem, and it won’t work.

    In the meantime I mean sure, why not. The more Perry can damage Mitt before slinking off into the sunset, the better. I do think “face off” is apt, I thoroughly expect one of them to go full chimp on one of the others at one of these debates soon.

  3. 3.

    James

    October 21, 2011 at 4:56 am

    More debates! More stark raving loonies on public display, the candidates AND the audience. This is Good News for John McCain Obama!

  4. 4.

    TenguPhule

    October 21, 2011 at 5:40 am

    Debate Death March

    Now that’s a format for the GOP I can get behind.

    Make them walk and talk at the same time.

    And remember to have lots of popcorn handy.

  5. 5.

    SRW1

    October 21, 2011 at 5:47 am

    Nice example of how the interest of the parts conspire against the interest of the whole. The motivation of Fox and all candidates not named Romney are obvious: Fox get’s ratings and all candidates not named Romney get more opportunities to take shots at Mittens. But the GOP can’t possibly delude itself into the illusion that this clown car is envigorating support for the party.

  6. 6.

    Joseph Nobles

    October 21, 2011 at 6:11 am

    At what point does Obama have to report these debates as campaign contributions? I’m thinking some time last month.

  7. 7.

    RosiesDad

    October 21, 2011 at 6:29 am

    Gail Collins returning from book leave was the best thing to happen to the Times op ed page in quite some time.

  8. 8.

    Cervantes

    October 21, 2011 at 6:35 am

    Gail Collins returning from book leave was the best thing to happen to the Times op ed page since Gail Collins went on book leave.

  9. 9.

    Baud

    October 21, 2011 at 6:38 am

    I’m excited. More GOP debates means more hilarious BJ debate threads and post-debate commentary. Yay!

  10. 10.

    dmsilev

    October 21, 2011 at 6:41 am

    @Joseph Nobles: Someone, I believe on Twitter, reported the other day that “Barack Obama just won his sixth consecutive GOP debate.”.

  11. 11.

    harlana

    October 21, 2011 at 6:58 am

    Next debate, Perry’s just gonna pull out that concealed six-shooter and blast Mitt in the face.

  12. 12.

    Geoduck

    October 21, 2011 at 7:09 am

    @harlana:

    Next debate, Perry’s just gonna pull out that concealed six-shooter and blast Mitt in the face.

    Well, that would doubly clinch the nomination for him…

  13. 13.

    ET

    October 21, 2011 at 7:30 am

    I must admit I am confused as to why the candidates keep showing up. I know they are all deluded to one degree or another and actually think Americans support them more than they do, but more face time will not in fact, make people like them more. It might actually make more people more likely see them for the fools they are by giving people more opportunity to see them.

  14. 14.

    arguingwithsignposts

    October 21, 2011 at 7:35 am

    This week’s debate was a triumph for Perry

    I don’t get this. The post-debate commentary and real-time reaction online seemed to suggest Romney got the best of that pissing match.

    Can the pundits just decide who won based on how it fits with their punchlines?

  15. 15.

    JD Rhoades

    October 21, 2011 at 8:05 am

    @SRW1:

    Well, the frontrunners are stuck. There is no party establishment the fringe candidates will listen to that can say, “hey, this isn’t good for the Party, cut it out.” And if there aren’t constant debates, the fringers will be all “what are they scared of!?” So the party careens ever closer to the cliff.

  16. 16.

    WereBear

    October 21, 2011 at 8:45 am

    So far, the debates have sunk somebody. Keep bringin’ them on!

  17. 17.

    Wil

    October 21, 2011 at 8:50 am

    More debates=more Republiklans in the news=keeping the GOP in the news as much or more than Obama.

    In presidential elections, especially early in the cycle, the incumbent president enjoys a huge advantage simply because everything he says or does is reported on, as opposed to candidates striving to maintain a presence in the media even somewhat on par with a sitting president.

    That’s all this is. More debates=more media time.

  18. 18.

    FlipYrWhig

    October 21, 2011 at 8:54 am

    Everything that the press corps always said about Al Gore’s personality and demeanor seems to be actually true of Mitt Romney.

  19. 19.

    FlipYrWhig

    October 21, 2011 at 8:59 am

    @Wil: Only if you subscribe to the “no publicity is bad publicity” theory. They look like goons every time. It’s media time, but it’s embarrassing media time, like Lindsay Lohan gets.

  20. 20.

    drew42

    October 21, 2011 at 9:11 am

    Gail Collins writes weak, ineffectual crap that serves no purpose other than giving right wingers something to point to when they complain about the “elitist liberal” media.

    She’s never written anything that could possibly sway an independent or low information voter. Just self-serving shit that makes pseudo-liberal idiots chuckle, because they think she’s being clever and witty.

  21. 21.

    chrome agnomen

    October 21, 2011 at 9:15 am

    well, it’s not like any of the candidates has any actual governance to do which would conflict with the debate schedule. (or anything else.)

  22. 22.

    AA+ Bonds

    October 21, 2011 at 9:18 am

    Gail Collins: not a great troll

  23. 23.

    cleek

    October 21, 2011 at 9:19 am

    @Wil:
    yup

    it’s free air time and days of media attention for the GOP.

    @FlipYrWhig:
    sadly, there are plenty of (probably insane) people who think the GOP candidates are serious thinkers.

  24. 24.

    dave

    October 21, 2011 at 9:31 am

    This is the last post of Anne Laurie’s I will ever read. People who like Gail Collins and think the Seamus story has any journalistic value at all are political nihilists lacking all sound judgment. Also what drew42 @ 20 said.

  25. 25.

    WereBear

    October 21, 2011 at 9:54 am

    @dave: People who like Gail Collins and think the Seamus story has any journalistic value at all are political nihilists lacking all sound judgment.

    I think the Seamus story illustrates poor judgement, lack of empathy, and terrible child rearing practices.

    Not that it has anything to do with electing a Republican President…

  26. 26.

    Cris (without an H)

    October 21, 2011 at 10:04 am

    I initially saw “train wreck” as “brain wreck,” which works too.

  27. 27.

    Judas Escargot

    October 21, 2011 at 10:19 am

    @Wil:

    That’s all this is. More debates=more FREE media time.

    Just a little clarification there.

    Anyone else wonder if the incumbent was a Republican, and we had 7 Democratic challengers, would those Dems be getting all this free air time?

  28. 28.

    Barry

    October 21, 2011 at 10:54 am

    @arguingwithsignposts: “Can the pundits just decide who won based on how it fits with their punchlines?”

    Yes – see the archives of ‘The Daily Howler’ about the 2000 election for evidence (assuming that it goes back that far).

  29. 29.

    catclub

    October 21, 2011 at 11:14 am

    @SRW1: Interests indeed.
    Fox’s ratings have soared with the election of Obama. If he loses they can expect to go down.

    On the other hand Roger Ailes is a crazy right wing loon, who really wants the GOP to win.

  30. 30.

    handsmile

    October 21, 2011 at 11:37 am

    I believe Will’s comment above (17) astutely identifies the fundamental reason for the proliferation of GOP “debates.” Two other factors may also be in play, both deliberately designed to blunt Obama’s quick-wittedness and oratorical genius.

    Job training: These nationally-televised spectacles provide the eventual GOP presidential candidate (if you believe s/he will be chosen from among these klowns which I’m not yet convinced of) with invaluable experience in the structure and rhythms of the “debate” format. This will be of enormous benefit when the candidate finds him/herself on stage alone with Obama in the early autumn of 2012.

    Cheapening the product: With so many “debates” providing cheap entertainment but little substantive information, the purported value of a “Presidential Debate” may be debased. Television viewers may become disinclined to watch yet another such event, even one between the two (or three) nominated candidates.

    I fully concede this latter point may be dubious, but it is grounded in the declining television audience for broadcast award presentations, now that the number of such programs has significantly increased.

  31. 31.

    eemom

    October 21, 2011 at 11:38 am

    it pains me to type these words, but fucking Krauthammer of all people has a spot-on column today about Tuesday night’s clusterfuck. (Not gonna link though, lest my agonized wailing alarm the dogs.)

    There’s an especially good part where he skewers Mitty for his “plaintive” turning to “Anderson?” to bail his ass out when Perry was hammering him. “What’s he going to do in Vienna when Putin is poking a finger in his chest and yelling? Call Anderson?”

    To put it simply, Krautie sees the writing on the wall for his par-tay next year and he ain’t a happy camper. Not one little bit. Tee hee.

  32. 32.

    feebog

    October 21, 2011 at 11:49 am

    Not as fancy as the $12 million beachfront pad the Romneys are currently renovating in California, but it was home….

    Actually, the beachfront pad, while nice, is more expensive than the Boston compound because of location. La Jolla is about the most expensive chunk of real estate in California. That’s why Mittens wants to tear down what is a perfectly liveable house and turn it into a McMansion.

  33. 33.

    giltay

    October 21, 2011 at 11:52 am

    It appears that all of Michele Bachmann’s New Hampshire staff have quit.

  34. 34.

    Beauzeaux

    October 21, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    “And this country is based on, as Newt talked about, these values that are so important as we go forward, and the idea that we should not have our freedom of religion, to be taken away by any means.)

    Maybe he’s Sarah Palin’s long-lost (though not long enough) brother/child/uncle/cousin. It has all the signs of her style.

  35. 35.

    eemom

    October 21, 2011 at 12:45 pm

    @drew42:

    I agree. Can’t stand that smug smirk of hers.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - dmkingto - SF Bay Area Scenes 7
Image by dmkingto (7/31/25)
Donate

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Covid & Other Plagues Update (Jul 16, 2025 @ 4:19am)
  • sab on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Jul 16, 2025 @ 4:04am)
  • sab on Covid & Other Plagues Update (Jul 16, 2025 @ 4:01am)
  • sab on Covid & Other Plagues Update (Jul 16, 2025 @ 3:55am)
  • Nelle on Covid & Other Plagues Update (Jul 16, 2025 @ 3:44am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!