• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

This country desperately needs a functioning fourth estate.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

75% of people clapping liked the show!

Their boy Ron is an empty plastic cup that will never know pudding.

“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

The rest of the comments were smacking Boebert like she was a piñata.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Trump should be leading, not lying.

Innocent people do not delay justice.

If rights aren’t universal, they are privilege, not rights.

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

The republican speaker is a slippery little devil.

When they say they are pro-life, they do not mean yours.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Education / Nibbling Around the Edges

Nibbling Around the Edges

by @heymistermix.com|  October 26, 20117:52 am| 45 Comments

This post is in: Education

FacebookTweetEmail

Obama does a little something for low-income student loan holders:

At a press briefing Tuesday afternoon, Melody Barnes, director of the Domestic Policy Council, said the president would use his executive authority to expand the existing income-based repayment program with a “Pay as You Earn” option that would allow graduates to pay 10 percent of their discretionary income for 20 years and have the rest of their federal student loan debt forgiven. That plan would start next year.

Most of the 450,000 low-income student-loan borrowers currently enrolled in income-based payment must pay 15 percent of their discretionary income for 25 years before having their debt forgiven, although terms are easier for those in public service.

Speaking of forgiveness, I’ll forgive anyone who thinks this is a typo or transcription error, since I, too, can’t remember the last time a benefits program was improved for anyone under 65.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Early Morning Open Thread: Happy Diwali!
Next Post: Hermaneutics »

Reader Interactions

45Comments

  1. 1.

    freelancer (iPhone)

    October 26, 2011 at 8:05 am

    Carlin and Stanhope have bitched about domestic policy being totally batshit because “old fucks vote”! This is just a start in encouraging “young fucks” to vote.

  2. 2.

    arguingwithsignposts

    October 26, 2011 at 8:05 am

    WORSE THAN BUSH!

  3. 3.

    Comrade Javamanphil

    October 26, 2011 at 8:10 am

    I now feel incentivized to borrow even more money to pay for college education! Darn government handouts always keeping me down.

  4. 4.

    JPL

    October 26, 2011 at 8:10 am

    MSM will say he should do more without pointing out that executive order only goes so far.

  5. 5.

    bkny

    October 26, 2011 at 8:12 am

    and meanwhile …:

    President Obama supports passage of House GOP legislation that would eliminate a tax compliance rule affecting big government contractors and pay for it by limiting Medicaid eligibility, the White House announced Tuesday.

  6. 6.

    MattF

    October 26, 2011 at 8:14 am

    Well, I’d take a careful look at the details. How, in particular, is the interest rate for the loan determined? I only ask because back in the ’70’s, Yale offered a ‘Tuition Postponement Option’ loan where you paid a specified percent of your income per year and the interest rate varied according to the prevailing rate. The interest rate spike in the 80’s left all the borrowers with huge debts (which Yale, to its credit, forgave). So, Borrower Beware.

  7. 7.

    superdestroyer

    October 26, 2011 at 8:16 am

    How does the government define discretionary income? It seems like a loophole that means that only the foolish will have to repay anything.

  8. 8.

    RSA

    October 26, 2011 at 8:20 am

    Excellent news. Of course, if I were a teabagger, I’d be thinking about my own student loans, which I paid off in full, walking to the bank uphill through the snow every month, barefoot, to make my payments.

  9. 9.

    Kelly

    October 26, 2011 at 8:21 am

    How does the government define discretionary income? It seems like a loophole that means that only the foolish will have to repay anything

    If they keep the same calculation they use for the current IBR program, discretionary income is anything you earn over 150% of the poverty rate (depending on family size).

  10. 10.

    Mark S.

    October 26, 2011 at 8:24 am

    OT I know Patterico is a dumbass, but the fact that David Duke made a youtube decrying “Zionist Wall Street” does not actually prove that OWS is anti-Semitic. This guy’s a fucking prosecutor?

  11. 11.

    Fucen Pneumatic Fuck Wrench Tarmal

    October 26, 2011 at 8:32 am

    this means more to the colleges and universities than it does to most students.

  12. 12.

    singfoom

    October 26, 2011 at 8:35 am

    That’s good. Glad to see them doing something even while Congress is fiddling. Can someone clear something up for me? I thought that a year or two ago, they had passed a law to remove private lenders from student loans. I know this isn’t the case, but what the hell happened?

    Was it just for one class of loans?

  13. 13.

    Argon

    October 26, 2011 at 8:35 am

    The extension for adding children (up to the age of 26) to your insurance plan is an example of a benefits improvement for some under 65.

  14. 14.

    cleek

    October 26, 2011 at 9:00 am

    @Mark S.:

    This guy’s a fucking prosecutor?

    well, he’s a professional liar with a wide range of things he’s willing to lie about.

  15. 15.

    cleek

    October 26, 2011 at 9:01 am

    @bkny:
    context is for losers

  16. 16.

    boss bitch

    October 26, 2011 at 9:07 am

    @singfoom:

    The law changes how student loans are administered. Borrowers used to be able to get college loans from either banks or the federal government. In return for administering loans to students, private banks received federal subsidies to provide student loans.

    Under the new law, private banks will no longer handle federally backed student loans. Instead, the federal government will be the only lender to students. Supporters say the overhaul eliminates the fees banks get to act as the middlemen, saving the government billions of dollars.

    http://articles.cnn.com/2010-03-30/politics/student.aid.faqs_1_student-loans-pell-grant-program-white-house?_s=PM:POLITICS

  17. 17.

    scottinnj

    October 26, 2011 at 9:07 am

    This isn’t all that new – Australia has had a government loan program whereby repayment is a function of your income. Basically as your income rises, you pay a slightly higher % of your income in repayment (eg today if your income is below A$44k, you pay nothing, if it is say A$50k you would pay 4% per annum until repaid. The interest rate on the loan is basically the inflation rate so you have to repay the real value of the debt.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tertiary_education_fees_in_Australia#HECS

  18. 18.

    MomSense

    October 26, 2011 at 9:08 am

    @singfoom
    Yes, they did eliminate the program whereby government subsidized student loan lenders (because they didn’t pass the savings onto the borrowers) but it wasn’t retroactive. So this is some much needed relief for heavily indebted students.

  19. 19.

    singfoom

    October 26, 2011 at 9:12 am

    @boss bitch: Thanks for the link. So they removed the banks as middlemen driving up the percentages on federally based loans. They didn’t get rid of private lending all together. A step in the right direction.

    When I looked recently, federal loans are capped between 4% and 8%, private loans at 18%. I think I calculated that I’ll be in my late 50s before I pay off grad school, and that’s at 4% consolidated. I can’t imagine how I’d ever pay anything off if I was near 20% interest.

    I hope they’re able to pass legislation to really help out students beyond what the administration has done here. There’s no reason to have someone be in crippling debt at the beginning of their career.

  20. 20.

    El Cid

    October 26, 2011 at 9:18 am

    @RSA: This is a good point. I make it a project to dip into a deep well of bitterness whenever someone now seems to get some sort of break which I didn’t get in the past.

    I can barely hold back from going in and smashing all those computers in the classroom ’cause I sure didn’t have no damn gubmit-bought computers in my classes! Undeserving little shits!

  21. 21.

    jsfox

    October 26, 2011 at 9:21 am

    @bkny: You know it would really help if you bothered to really look at what the GOP wants to do and what Obama has agreed or not agreed to do.

    1) Obama has agreed to nada. All he has said is that he looks forward to working with Congress. The 3% reduction was already in the jobs act.
    2) The medicare part makes the assumption that it meets the requirements of ACA and doesn’t effect care to beneficiaries. Here it’s important to note that this move would further clarify eligibility for Medicaid under the ACA. If someone does not qualify for Medicaid ( income <133% of the federal poverty level) under the ACA, they will still qualify for subsidies from 133% to 400% of the federal poverty level to obtain insurance via the Exchange.

  22. 22.

    gbear

    October 26, 2011 at 9:23 am

    But he’s still the worst president ever for sure by far 100%.

    /assholes from yesterday’s comments

  23. 23.

    boss bitch

    October 26, 2011 at 9:30 am

    Democrats give us student loan relief while Republicans want to gut Pell Grants and advise us to go get 3 jobs. yep both parties are the same.

  24. 24.

    dave

    October 26, 2011 at 9:30 am

    This is great news for those students who have been totally screwed by our higher education system and the economic collapse. However, it does nothing to address the real problem and creates some perverse consequences:

    1. Since college loans are federally guaranteed, this means that taxpayers will be picking up the tab for these loans. By the time 20 years has elapsed, the average IBR debt has accrued so much interest that it is actually 2-5 times the size of the original debt, meaning that taxpayers will be footing a $500,000 per student bill.

    2. This creates an incentive (especially for professional school) where students have nothing to lose by seeking more schooling, regardless of that’s schooling intrinsic worth (or even their desire to enter that profession). Students who cant find a job out of college will spend hundreds of thousands getting virtually useless professional degrees and have no incentive to investigate whether it makes economic sense in the long run.

    3. Since this makes students even less price sensitive than they already are, schools are free to continue to raise tuition to absurd heights. For the average student, there is no practical difference between owing $200,000 and owing $300,000 since IBR (the taxpayers) will be picking up the tab either way.

    4. When the debt is forgiven, the IRS considers the amount of forgiven debt to be taxable income, meaning that these students will end up owing a six figure tax bill 20 years from now regardless of their financial status at that time. Most students don’t know this. Even those who do know this, are too desperate to worry about something 20 years in the future.

  25. 25.

    Bill H.

    October 26, 2011 at 9:40 am

    @dave:
    Thank you dave for pointing out the “mixed blessing” that this move really is. Add to that,

    5. It is unknown what portion of student loans were actually used to purchase Mercedes Benz automobiles or were lent to boyfriends or girfriends who were sponging off persons who had these loans rather than actually working for a living, or were used to provide bail money to get either the loan holders, their family members or close friends out of jail after drunken parties.

    Yes, we should not throw the baby out with the bath water, but neither should we drink the bath water and call it KoolAid merely because there is a baby in it. The baby may be cute as hell, but the bath water is still full of baby poop and spit up.

  26. 26.

    Campionrules

    October 26, 2011 at 10:34 am

    As someone with student loan debt, and multiple consecutive years of payments, I like the concept of lessening the burden on a lot of student. (I’ll likely be eligible for IBR under the new plan – but won’t utilize it because i’d can afford barely to make larger payments now and would prefer to reduce the principle as quickly as possible)

    However, the really worrying thing here is that students will continue to disregard student loans as anything ‘real’ and continue to accrue debt recklessly for degrees that are in less than useful fields from schools that are basically diploma mills with national(read:useless) accreditation.

    Trust me: The schools will continue to kick up the ever growing and ridiculous cost of tuition and new propriety schools will blossom even more. (Get your A.A.S. in Criminal Justice! Only 43K! The FBI will hire you!)

    Sigh.

  27. 27.

    MomSense

    October 26, 2011 at 10:34 am

    “Speaking of forgiveness, I’ll forgive anyone who thinks this is a typo or transcription error, since I, too, can’t remember the last time a benefits program was improved for anyone under 65.”

    What about expansion of SCHIP, Under 26ers being able to get health insurance through their parents’ plan, the Health Care and Reconciliation Act, and expansion of Pell Grants. Even though the firebaggers hate to hear it, Lily Ledbetter helps women when we are in our peak earning years. I’m also thinking that making insurance companies include birth control is pretty important to folks under 65.

  28. 28.

    burnspbesq

    October 26, 2011 at 10:40 am

    @bkny:

    tax compliance rule

    That’s a deeply disingenuous way to describe a withholding tax.

  29. 29.

    geg6

    October 26, 2011 at 10:54 am

    @Fucen Pneumatic Fuck Wrench Tarmal:

    How so exactly?

    As a student aid administrator, I’m at a loss as to what benefit this provides to my employer. I am, however, not at all at a loss as to what it means for some of my students. This is simply an extension of the existing ICR plan. I have never seen any sort of benefit accrue to my university from the students to whom I’ve steered toward this type of repayment of their federal loans.

  30. 30.

    FlipYrWhig

    October 26, 2011 at 10:56 am

    @gbear: I just stopped by TBogg, who (it turns out) had a piece yesterday about Elizabeth Warren and OWS. The comments featured people complaining about the insufficient progressive zeal of… Elizabeth Warren. She was just a lackey for the nefarious deeds of the Obama administration, you see. What a world.

  31. 31.

    geg6

    October 26, 2011 at 11:00 am

    @MomSense:

    It will also save those students who have loans through both the defunct FFEL Program (the loans which were administered by banks) and the Direct Loan Program from having to pay two separate bills, which is confusing and is considered one of the (several) reasons for the recent higher default rates on federal student loans. If students were in the middle of their schooling when the change to federal loan administration happened, they have to pay two separate loan payments. From what I read and saw about this this morning, they will now be able to consolidate them into one payment.

  32. 32.

    geg6

    October 26, 2011 at 11:03 am

    @singfoom:

    There is no cap on private loans’ interest rates. Just sayin’.

    This year’s federal loan interest rates are 3.4% for subsidized Stafford Loans, 6.8% for unsubsidized Stafford Loans, and 7.9% for PLUS Loans. Perkins Loans have always had an interest rate of 5% since that is written into the law creating them.

  33. 33.

    RSA

    October 26, 2011 at 11:05 am

    @El Cid:

    I can barely hold back from going in and smashing all those computers in the classroom ‘cause I sure didn’t have no damn gubmit-bought computers in my classes! Undeserving little shits!

    Kids these days. All the educational handouts they could ask for, and they won’t get off my lawn.

  34. 34.

    OzoneR

    October 26, 2011 at 11:12 am

    @Bill H.:

    we should not throw the baby out with the bath water, but neither should we drink the bath water and call it KoolAid merely because there is a baby in it.

    Fucking idioms, how do they work?

  35. 35.

    MomSense

    October 26, 2011 at 11:13 am

    @geg6 #31
    Great point!

  36. 36.

    geg6

    October 26, 2011 at 11:15 am

    @dave:

    3. Since this makes students even less price sensitive than they already are, schools are free to continue to raise tuition to absurd heights. For the average student, there is no practical difference between owing $200,000 and owing $300,000 since IBR (the taxpayers) will be picking up the tab either way.
    __
    4. When the debt is forgiven, the IRS considers the amount of forgiven debt to be taxable income, meaning that these students will end up owing a six figure tax bill 20 years from now regardless of their financial status at that time. Most students don’t know this. Even those who do know this, are too desperate to worry about something 20 years in the future.

    This is so wrong, I don’t know where to begin. Let’s just start by saying that no student can borrow $300,000 under the federal loan program. Not even medical students. None. And the only ones who can borrow up to $224,000 are medical students. No one else. The maximum any other student not in medical school can borrow is $138,500. These total include the amounts they borrowed as undergrads, the maximum of which is $31,000 for dependent undergrads and $57,500 for independent undergrads.

    Current default rates have risen to 8.8%. Broken down it comes to 6-7.2% for public colleges/universities, 4-4.6% for privates colleges/universities, and 11.6-15% for for-profit schools. Get the for-profits out of the federal loan programs and we have a pretty good repayment rate, even under the current economic conditions.

  37. 37.

    Gromitt Gunn

    October 26, 2011 at 11:51 am

    Geg got to some the corrections before I could.

    A couple more:

    1. Someone commented about not want to o onto IBR because their payments would increase. That would only happen if your current payments are below the discretionary income threshold – and in that case, you’ll have your loans paid off before you would qualify for loan forgiveness.

    2. There is no adverse tax consequence for forgiveness of federally guaranteed student loans. The forgiven amounts are not taxable. The existing programs for health workers, teachers, public service employees, etc. (of which this would be an extension) provide tax-free forgiveness. Note this refers only to federally guaranteed loans, and not private loans.

  38. 38.

    catpal

    October 26, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    @dave:

    1. Since college loans are federally guaranteed, this means that taxpayers will be picking up the tab for these loans

    oh – you mean just like all those $$$ Million-dollar wall Street banksters fraudulent mortgage loans?

    2. This creates an incentive

    like TARP that guarantees the TBTF bankster’s ongoing gambling and fraud?

    You are too funny.

  39. 39.

    dave

    October 26, 2011 at 3:50 pm

    geg6 @ 36:

    Obviously I just threw those numbers out as examples. However, you are aware that student loans accumulate interest while the borrower is in school and is not making payments, right? As a result students graduate owing significantly more than they originally borrowed, making your “caps” meaningless. I am no math wizard but I would bet that someone who has borrowed a total of $138,000 at 6% interest over four years of undergrad and 2-3 years of graduate/professional school will finally graduate with a student loan debt far exceeding $138,000.

    In any case, the specific numbers don’t matter. My point remains that students are not price sensitive when they can qualify for any amount of loan and know that in 20 years their debt will be forgiven.

    Gromitt Gunn @37:

    You are correct that the public interest version of IBR does not consider the loan forgiveness to be taxable. However, under the regular IBR (for non-public interest employees) does consider the loan forgiveness to be a taxable event.

    catpal@38:

    I agree with everything you just said but i guess I don’t really get what’s funny about it.

  40. 40.

    geg6

    October 26, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    @dave:

    However, you are aware that student loans accumulate interest while the borrower is in school and is not making payments, right?

    Um, as I mentioned in #29 above, I am a student aid officer for a major U.S. university. So, yes, I am aware that some of those loans accumulate interest while the student is in school. That would be, however, only the portion of a student’s loans that are unsubsidized Stafford Loans. The vast, vast majority of undergrad students qualify for the subsidized Stafford Loan for most of their federal loans (undergrad limit is $23,000 ). In addition, Federal Perkins Loans are also subsidized. By subsidized, I mean that no interest accumulates while the student is in school and during their grace period before beginning repayment (6 months for Stafford Loans and 9 months for Perkins). In addition, principal can be deferred after graduation and interest will not accumulate if you qualify for an economic hardship deferment (or an active duty student deferment). These deferments can be requested at any time during the grace period before repayment begins.

    And if you think students even think about price sensitivity or are even the least bit aware of debt forgiveness or deferments or IBR plans or anything else about their student loans (despite our massive and futile efforts to educate them), you live in a dream world. There is no moral hazard here, however much you want to make seem like there is. Hell, even their parents are not economically literate enough to understand anything about the risks you seem to think they take into account. The vast, vast, vast majority of students and parents don’t even understand what a damn loan is, let alone have “price sensitivity” or make any sort of complicated calculations about how to rip off tax payers 25 years in the future.

  41. 41.

    geg6

    October 26, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    And I forgot to mention that a student can qualify for economic deferment for up to 3 years and an active duty deferment up to 13 months following the conclusion of active duty service.

  42. 42.

    Jenny

    October 26, 2011 at 6:48 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    That’s a deeply disingenuous way to describe a withholding tax.

    TPM is nothing if not “deeply disingenuous”

  43. 43.

    Jenny

    October 26, 2011 at 6:51 pm

    @FlipYrWhig:

    The comments featured people complaining about the insufficient progressive zeal of… Elizabeth Warren. She was just a lackey for the nefarious deeds of the Obama administration, you see.

    This isn’t new. The Hive has been sour on her ever since the Queen Bee said she would make a “terrible” Senator.

  44. 44.

    Jenny

    October 26, 2011 at 6:53 pm

    @MomSense:

    Even though the firebaggers hate to hear it, Lily Ledbetter helps women when we are in our peak earning years.

    It’s disgusting how the PUMAs hate/resent the Lilly Ledbetter Act.

  45. 45.

    Robert Waldmann

    October 26, 2011 at 7:57 pm

    typo indeed “since I, too, can’t remember the last time a benefits program was improved for anyone under 65.| Ever heard of SCHIP (made more generous in 2009) ? How about unemployment insurance (temporarily improved with repeated extensions of the temporary extension to 99 weeks from 26) ?
    How about expanded SNAP (the program formerly known as food stamps) ? How about the PPACA ? It isn’t implemented yet (and might be reversed if more people forget about it) but it is scheduled to extend Medicaid to about 15,000,000 more people. Hell, this is balloon-juice the anti firedoglake and you forgot about the medicaid expansion in the PPACA (by far the largest expansion of social welfare in the USA since the 60s). I expect Jane Hamsher to present HCR reform as a mandate plus maybe a public option, but overlooking 15,000,000 people is a bit odd for this blog.

    What the hell were you smoking when you typed this post ?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by MomSense (5/10.25)

Recent Comments

  • Eyeroller on Open Thread: Creativity Is inherently Non-Conservative (May 20, 2025 @ 1:22pm)
  • Chief Oshkosh on Open Thread: Creativity Is inherently Non-Conservative (May 20, 2025 @ 1:19pm)
  • brantl on Open Thread: Creativity Is inherently Non-Conservative (May 20, 2025 @ 1:14pm)
  • Eyeroller on Open Thread: Creativity Is inherently Non-Conservative (May 20, 2025 @ 1:13pm)
  • brantl on Open Thread: Creativity Is inherently Non-Conservative (May 20, 2025 @ 1:12pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!