• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Trump’s legal defense is going to be a dumpster fire inside a clown car on a derailing train.

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

Consistently wrong since 2002

“And when the Committee says to “report your income,” that could mean anything!

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

“woke” is the new caravan.

In after Baud. Damn.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2012 / Mister Mojo rising

Mister Mojo rising

by DougJ|  November 4, 20111:39 pm| 52 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012, Green Balloons

FacebookTweetEmail

Rising, rising, got to keep on rising:

The poll was conducted Oct. 31 through Nov. 3, starting the evening after Politico first reported the harassment allegations. Support for Cain was basically steady over the four nights of interviewing, even as new charges against him surfaced.

Nearly a quarter of all Republicans and GOP-leaning independents now back Cain as the party’s nominee, his best showing in Post-ABC polls this year, and up significantly from early October. At 23 percent nationally, Cain is neck-and-neck with Romney (24 percent) atop the GOP field.

Republicans should vote for whoever they want and I am sympathetic to conservatives who feel that the establishment is trying to shove Romney down their throats. At the same time, I can’t imagine allegations like this not hurting a Democratic candidate badly, among Democratic primary voters. (Before anyone goes there, this is nothing like Clinton’s impeachment, since this was not preceded by a multi-year federally-funded witch-hunt against Cain.)

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread – I think she wants something from me but I’m not sure what it is
Next Post: Twenty Couples That Can’t Get Married, but Kim Kardashian Can… »

Reader Interactions

52Comments

  1. 1.

    fasteddie9318

    November 4, 2011 at 1:41 pm

    Before anyone goes there, this is nothing like Clinton’s impeachment, since this was not preceded by a multi-year federally-funded witch-hunt against Cain.

    Also too, there’s the little matter of, you know, consent versus harassment.

  2. 2.

    DougJ

    November 4, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    @fasteddie9318:

    That too.

  3. 3.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 4, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    @fasteddie9318:

    Hey! These women worked for the same organization as Cain! That’s consent if I ever saw it!

    /wingnut

  4. 4.

    greg

    November 4, 2011 at 1:46 pm

    I don’t know, I still don’t think enough time has passed for the allegations to really sink in as truthful with the majority of those polled here. How long did it take for the stories around John Edwards’ affair to become credible enough to sink his candidacy? More than a week or so, surely?

  5. 5.

    Hunter Gathers

    November 4, 2011 at 1:47 pm

    I keep hearing that conservatives will accept Mittens as the nominee, but I’m not seeing it. Voting starts in 2 months. And Willard can’t break 25% against a grifter (Cain), a moron (Perry), an asshole (Gingrich), a couple of strange Bible thumpers (La Bachmann and the Frothy Mix) a bat-shit crazy libertarian (Paul) and a nobody (Huntsman).

  6. 6.

    jibeaux

    November 4, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    @greg:

    enough time has passed for the allegations to really sink in as truthful

    Nahgunnahappen. Election’s only a year away.

  7. 7.

    MikeJ

    November 4, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    It’s a pity that the story wasn’t broken by a credible news source, one like the National Enquirer.

  8. 8.

    Comrade Dread

    November 4, 2011 at 1:50 pm

    I really don’t think the GOP voters realize just what a liability Cain will be on them if they elect him.
    His tax plan is easily proven to raise taxes on the lower and middle classes while cutting taxes for the wealthy. It will end Social Security and Medicare as we know them. (Assuming this doesn’t happen in the next year anyway.)

    He has zero foreign policy experience, knowledge, or curiosity in the face of a world where we’re engaged in 4 nation-states, face emerging economies and rival powers that want to exercise power in their spheres of influence; while a larger and larger portion of the Middle East continues to hate our policies more and more.

    And now he has baggage that raises questions about his treatment of women.

    I guess they’re betting the farm on the economy sucking enough that enough independents, moderates and women shrug and cast anti-Obama votes anyway.

  9. 9.

    curiousleo

    November 4, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    I can’t imagine allegations like this not hurting a Democratic candidate badly, among Democratic primary voters.

    You know what would definitely hurt a candidate? Accepting illegal campaign money. More blogs/people/reporters need to be talking about the allegation that Cain took illegal campaign money.

  10. 10.

    Rome Again

    November 4, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    @fasteddie9318:

    Thanks, I was just planning to go there and you beat me to it.

    Much appreciated. :)

  11. 11.

    Poopyman

    November 4, 2011 at 1:58 pm

    @Comrade Dread:

    I really don’t think the GOP voters realize just what a liability Cain will be on them if they elect him.

    You realize they really truly don’t care, don’t you? Republican candidates have been touting policies that hurt their constituents for years, well before GWH Bush. GOP voters still vote them into office. Now they can see the results of all of those policies and still blithely label them as “liberal” and continue to support the right-wing money candidates. Some things never change.

  12. 12.

    Studly Pantload, Boy King of Ubekibekibekistanstan

    November 4, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    I dunno, seems Clinton had to deal with the Gennifer Flowers imbroglio running up to the NH primary. No lawyers or hush money involved, but hers was a tale of a heart betrayed.

    That said, one of Cain’s harassees may yet decide it’s worth the discomfort to come forward, and her story, if told, is still a wild card. And if any other of his marks also speaks up — well, even if it don’t sink him, it’ll at least be entertaining (watching the Cain camp deal, that is – no entertainment in seeing a woman go public with an embarrassing story that will earn her much derision from certain quarters).

  13. 13.

    Rome Again

    November 4, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    @Comrade Dread:

    I guess they’re betting the farm on the economy sucking enough that enough independents, moderates and women shrug and cast anti-Obama votes anyway.

    As I’ve heard it, they are absolutely sure Obama cannot be re-elected in that economic climate.

  14. 14.

    Suffern ACE

    November 4, 2011 at 2:01 pm

    Yeah, this isn’t anything like the Clinton situation. We’ll know that it is when Cain hires Dick Morris advise him on the situation.

  15. 15.

    Stooleo

    November 4, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    I can’t imagine allegations like this not hurting a Democratic candidate badly, among Democratic primary voters.

    Hell, Republicans don’t give a damn, the candidate just has to be part of the tribe. I bet if Timothy McVeigh was running (if he was still around, may he rot in hell) would be polling in the 30s

  16. 16.

    FlipYrWhig

    November 4, 2011 at 2:05 pm

    @fasteddie9318: Well, of course, the whole Paula Jones case was about harassment.

  17. 17.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 4, 2011 at 2:05 pm

    @Poopyman:

    What Poopyman said. These people are so nuts that they’ll run someone just to piss the liberals off, and, oh, by the way, drive up the turnout and insure that the “pure” Rethug candidate gets his clock cleaned, inside and out, by the near sheriff, and take down Rethug candidates for Senate and House seats, and state offices, in the process.

    They’re that fucking nuts.

  18. 18.

    jl

    November 4, 2011 at 2:05 pm

    No, it was not proceeded by a multi year federally funded witch hunt against Cain. Which is more evidence of how the current system lavishes federal largess on liberals and discriminates against conservatives.

    There was no federal subsidy for the Cain sexual harassment charges, but Clinton got millions. Some poor hard working Karl Rove flunky had to pick up the phone and call Politico on his or her own dime.

    That is just not fair, and if liberals would be honest with themselves and intellectually consistent for once, they would be eager to admit it.

  19. 19.

    Poopyman

    November 4, 2011 at 2:07 pm

    @Suffern ACE:

    Yeah, this isn’t anything like the Clinton situation. We’ll know that it is when Cain hires Dick Morris advise him on the situation.

    I dunno. If there are toes to be sucked I’d bet that Herm won’t need any help.

  20. 20.

    jrg

    November 4, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    I really don’t think the GOP voters realize just what a liability Cain will be on them if they elect him.

    That’s because they’re morons who think that most of us who support Obama do so because he’s black. Therefore, the obvious solution to to support someone who’s MOAR BLACKER.

    It’s the same identity-based reasoning that got them to support Palin, and gets them believing that evolution (“Darwinism”) is a religion instead of a scientific theory. Not only are they stupid as shit, they’re incapable of understanding that everyone else isn’t.

  21. 21.

    Suffern ACE

    November 4, 2011 at 2:10 pm

    @curiousleo: Shush. Sexy time. Our campaign laws are kind of arcane and technical. That would be boring plus and investigation might point to someone who is someone, and that would never do.

  22. 22.

    Brachiator

    November 4, 2011 at 2:13 pm

    @DougJ:

    At the same time, I can’t imagine allegations like this not hurting a Democratic candidate badly, among Democratic primary voters.

    Two things.

    For the gabilliionth time, polls don’t mean much. No one knows how actual primary voters will factor this in. That Cain’s support is steady now just does not tell you much that is meaningful. There has not been any primary yet, as far as I can tell. People should stop talking about primary voters.

    Secondly, there is little reason for anyone to have a big change of heart simply based on allegations. This should hold for any candidate of any party at any time.

    Lastly (and I know some dopes will misinterpret this), a lot of people here are acting as though all sexual harassment is exactly the same, and that one should immediately impose a political death penalty as soon as the word is mentioned or an accusation raised.

    This reminds me of people who need reminding that here in Southern California, Conrad Murray is being charged with involuntary manslaughter, not first degree murder, and who wonder why the sentence the prosecution is looking for is 4 years, not life. And smart people make a good case that this just should have been medical malpractice, not any kind of manslaughter.

    It is not unreasonable that potential voters may weigh the allegations differently than some posters here want, especially since political campaigns are not above smear campaigns. Granpa McCain can tell you about how other Republicans had tried to smear him in the past with despicable stuff.

    Do we know any details in the Cain Scrutiny Case?

  23. 23.

    Bubba

    November 4, 2011 at 2:22 pm

    Please allow me to suggest a few data points of other similar scandals to help you in your extrapolation in comparing the impact on Cain’s candidacy vs. your theoretical Democrat:

    Clarence Thomas
    David Vitter
    Mark Sanborn
    Anthony Weiner
    Eliot Spitzer

    Compare and contrast.

  24. 24.

    KG

    November 4, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    @Hunter Gathers: wasn’t McCain written off for dead at this point in 2008? A little Google-fu suggests so.

    End of the day, when GOP voters go into the voting booth and really think about choosing between the guy who is next in line (which means, in theory, he’s got some sort of relevant experience) and a challenger (who usually don’t have the relevant experience – I can’t imagine serving only as mayor, even if it is NYC or LA, can count for much; let alone no government experience).

  25. 25.

    Calouste

    November 4, 2011 at 2:27 pm

    @Bubba:

    Sanborn was a prospective presidential candidate for 2012, so his affair definitely had some impact. Although I wouldn’t be surprised to see him running in 2016.

  26. 26.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 4, 2011 at 2:29 pm

    @Bubba:

    Do you mean “Mark Sanford”, the “let’s hike the Appalachians all the way to Buenos Aires” guy?

  27. 27.

    Svensker

    November 4, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    @MikeJ:

    It’s a pity that the story wasn’t broken by a credible news source, one like the National Enquirer.

    Actually, when I worked in Hollywood, National Enquirer was considered pretty reliable on the trash gossip stuff.

  28. 28.

    Boots Day

    November 4, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    @jrg: I was just about to say the same thing. Conservatives honestly believe that liberals voted for Obama only because he’s black. They now think that Cain would do something like split the black vote with Obama, plus draw in a fair number of white centrists who pulled the D lever last time.

  29. 29.

    Catsy

    November 4, 2011 at 2:41 pm

    Apparently Cain loves the Koch:

    “I am the Koch brothers’ brother from another mother,” Cain told a crowd at a Koch-funded Americans For Prosperity gathering in Washington Friday.

  30. 30.

    harlana

    November 4, 2011 at 2:42 pm

    Okay, so they don’t give a damn if their candidate sexually harassed anyone, that’s a given and we shouldn’t be surprised.

    What IS a problem, for these folks, is his handling of the situation – if you don’t even have sense and sanity enough to consult your lawyer before running your mouth to the media about a rather substantial sexual harassment settlement,and changing your story 5 times a day, you really have no business running for president.

    This doesn’t concern them at all? Apparently not.

  31. 31.

    Johnny Gentle (famous crooner)

    November 4, 2011 at 2:54 pm

    At the same time, I can’t imagine allegations like this not hurting a Democratic candidate badly, among Democratic primary voters.

    This is because Democrats aren’t fucking crazy and don’t think sexual harassment is just bitchy feminists who can’t take a joke.

    Also, too, the surest way to get Republicans to support anything is to tell them they shouldn’t. They’re the party of “No, I will NOT eat my vegetables.” So if society says that Herman Cain should not have sexually harassed women, then dammit, we’ll rally around him because NO ONE tells ME what to do or think!

  32. 32.

    hells littlest angel

    November 4, 2011 at 2:54 pm

    If it turns out that what Cain said to those women that made them uncomfortable was that he wanted to shove his Romney down their throats, well then, the nomination will be up for grabs.

  33. 33.

    MikeJ

    November 4, 2011 at 2:55 pm

    @Svensker: The Enquirer broke the Edwards story too. My comment wasn’t a slam of the Enquirer, it was a slam of Politico.

  34. 34.

    Studly Pantload, Boy King of Ubekibekibekistanstan

    November 4, 2011 at 2:56 pm

    @harlana

    But – but – but, it feeds so neatly into the narrative that the guy is just so gosh-darnably unconventional! If he can keep the public so off-balance about his reaction to a personal scandal, imagine how off balance he’ll keep bad-actor heads of state and al Qaeda! Why, his equivocations will twist them into such knots that they won’t know what hit ’em when the bombs start dropping.

  35. 35.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    November 4, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    Republicans should vote for whoever they want and I am sympathetic to conservatives who feel that the establishment is trying to shove Romney down their throats. At the same time, I can’t imagine allegations like this not hurting a Democratic candidate badly, among Democratic primary voters.

    It would sink a Dem presidential candidate in a similar phase of the campaign process. Again, IOKIYAR style reporting that dominates the Villager narrative is in full swing. Nothing new here people, move along.

    The Repup establishment is trying to shove Romney down their throats because of what I’ve said before: they think they’ll lose in 2012 no matter what the economy looks like but are looking to avoid Goldwater 1964 downticket–and that would happen if the

    …grifter (Cain), a moron (Perry), an asshole (Gingrich), a couple of strange Bible thumpers (La Bachmann and the Frothy Mix) a bat-shit crazy libertarian (Paul) or a nobody (Huntsman)…

    gets the nomination. Okay, Huntsman wouldn’t gut the downticket candidates but the rest?

    The Repub establishment is skeeered, very, very skeered. Of course they have only themselves to blame, a generation of cozying up to these fucking nutjobs is now coming back to haunt them.

  36. 36.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 4, 2011 at 3:09 pm

    @comrade scott’s agenda of rage:

    they think they’ll lose in 2012 no matter what the economy looks like but are looking to avoid Goldwater 1964 downticket

    This, this, this.

    The Presidency is a write off at this point, it’s avoiding massive collateral damage to the rest of the brand that is the objective.

    Rove may be unspeakably evil, but he’s not stupid…just often blinded by his arrogance.

  37. 37.

    MBunge

    November 4, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    Okay, I just breezed through the other comments…but I can’t be the first person in the thread to mention the words “Paula Jones”, can I?

    Mike

  38. 38.

    Rhoda

    November 4, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    It’s not polite to say, but I honestly don’t see this Republican party voting in a Mormon nominee. They may do so out of a deep desire to won, but I don’t see it. And Morning Joe gave the game away when he said he hears folk saying they’re willing to let Obama win than go for Romney. That’s huge, Scarborough is talking about the evangelicals and business types.

    We’ll see when voters actually get a chance to have their say. If Cain gets to win Iowa or Perry comes back to run, Mittens has to worry about the political gravity going against him as it did Hillary in ’08.

  39. 39.

    dr. luba

    November 4, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    @Hunter Gathers: WRT Santorum, Charles Pierce says it best:

    Seriously, the amount of time that Rick Santorum spends thinking about other people’s lady parts, and what some men may be doing with their pee-pees, is highly disturbing. I mean, if the bus driver spent as much time talking about this stuff as Santorum does, you’d report him to the cops and carry your kids to school ten miles on your back.
    Your Democracy, ladies and gentlemen.
    Cherish it.

  40. 40.

    boss bitch

    November 4, 2011 at 3:30 pm

    Herman Cain. “I am the Koch brothers’ brother from another mother,” Cain said Friday.

  41. 41.

    Catsy

    November 4, 2011 at 3:36 pm

    @MBunge: My magical powers of Ctrl-F suggest that “Paula Jones” made an appearance in comment #16.

  42. 42.

    Snark Based Reality

    November 4, 2011 at 3:38 pm

    @fasteddie9318:

    Consent can be assumed when you see a woman is:

    1. Not in the kitchen
    2. Not barefoot
    3. Not pregnant
    4. Not wearing a wedding ring
    5. Older than 12

    I mean she was just ASKING for harassment. She was clearly lacking a man in her life to dominate her. It was the Lord’s work for Cain to step up and fill the gap.

  43. 43.

    Catsy

    November 4, 2011 at 3:41 pm

    @comrade scott’s agenda of rage: Granted the others are fucking nutjobs, but they are more or less reliably conservative nutjobs that the base loves. They hate Multiple Choice Mitt.

    I can only assume they think the downticket effects of depressed turnout from Romney would be less severe than the effects of running unhinged lunatics that will only excite their base and turn off everyone else.

  44. 44.

    fasteddie9318

    November 4, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    @FlipYrWhig: Yes, but he wasn’t impeached over Paula Jones.

  45. 45.

    CaliCat

    November 4, 2011 at 5:36 pm

    I stopped reading at “sympathetic to conservatives”

  46. 46.

    abo gato

    November 4, 2011 at 5:42 pm

    The hypocrisy of the R’s just drives me fucking nuts. We all know that if during Obama’s campaign there had been a mere whisper of anything like this from him he would have been excoriated. Everywhere, everyday. For months. But since it is a Black R candidate with allegations of sexual harassment, then it’s like yay for their team. They must hate women more than they hate Blacks. Fer craps sake, he’s gained in the polls and gotten tons of donations since this came out. What the fuck is wrong with conservatives?

  47. 47.

    SFAW

    November 4, 2011 at 6:26 pm

    DougJ –

    Just because I got nothin’ better to do, nor anything intelligent to write (wow, what a surprise): the word is “risin’ “, not “rising”.

    And it’s “Mr.”, not “Mister”

    Sincerely,

    SFAW
    Proprietor and CEO
    InsufferablePrigs’R’Us

  48. 48.

    xian

    November 4, 2011 at 7:00 pm

    @abo gato: well there was the rumor of his secret ghey affair with a pedophile

  49. 49.

    kmeyer the lurker

    November 4, 2011 at 8:06 pm

    This is so simple. The 27 percenters don’t give a rats ass about sexual harrassment. They think its fine.

  50. 50.

    FlipYrWhig

    November 4, 2011 at 8:16 pm

    @fasteddie9318: True, and I read the question and answer faster than I should have (and missed the important word “impeachment” in the OP).

    But my point was more that Clinton did in fact have to face sexual harassment allegations (Jones, Willey, Broaddrick, not all of which were deemed credible in the end) along with scandals about consensual affairs (Flowers, Lewinsky).

  51. 51.

    FlipYrWhig

    November 4, 2011 at 8:19 pm

    @kmeyer the lurker: They think it’s fine _and_ they think they’re owed some consideration by the Establishment Media. Because as they see it Clarence Thomas was savaged by harassment allegations but Clinton got away with it. So unless Cain gets away with it too it’s unfair, like, many times over.

  52. 52.

    Rome Again

    November 4, 2011 at 10:08 pm

    @comrade scott’s agenda of rage:

    Very interesting, especially considering the Tea Party nutjobs are dealing with a completely different reality (a fantasy, really) where they think they can’t lose if they go with Cain and the surest way to lose is to accept a Romney candidacy. I predict these people will probably not be speaking to each other a year from now.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Political Action

Postcard Writing Information

Recent Comments

  • Faustusnotes on War for Ukraine Day 579: A Brief Tuesday Night Update (Sep 26, 2023 @ 2:16am)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 579: A Brief Tuesday Night Update (Sep 26, 2023 @ 2:10am)
  • Sebastian on War for Ukraine Day 579: A Brief Tuesday Night Update (Sep 26, 2023 @ 1:52am)
  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: IN UNION THERE IS STRENGTH (Sep 26, 2023 @ 1:36am)
  • Villago Delenda Est on Late Night Open Thread: IN UNION THERE IS STRENGTH (Sep 26, 2023 @ 1:33am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!