• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Human rights are not a matter of opinion!

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

Polls are now a reliable indicator of what corporate Republicans want us to think.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

I have other things to bitch about but those will have to wait.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Republicans firmly believe having an abortion is a very personal, very private decision between a woman and J.D. Vance.

Tide comes in. Tide goes out. You can’t explain that.

Live so that if you miss a day of work people aren’t hoping you’re dead.

I’m more christian than these people and i’m an atheist.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

People are weird.

No one could have predicted…

We are learning that “working class” means “white” for way too many people.

Fucking consultants! (of the political variety)

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / An Unexamined Scandal / Knocking On Suburbia’s Door

Knocking On Suburbia’s Door

by Zandar|  November 8, 20119:58 am| 56 Comments

This post is in: An Unexamined Scandal, The War on Your Neighbor, aka the War on Drugs

FacebookTweetEmail

If you asked people whether they believed black teenagers or white teenagers were more likely to end up in a drug or alcohol dependency/abuse situation, I’m betting it would be the opposite of the results of a new extremely broad Duke University study on the subject.

Black and Asian adolescents are much less likely than their white peers to abuse or become dependent on drugs and alcohol, according to a Duke University-led study based on an unusually large sample from all 50 states.

“There is certainly still a myth out there that black kids are more likely to have problems with drugs than white kids, and this documents as clearly as any study we’re aware of that the rate of . . . substance-related disorders among African American youths is significantly lower,” said Dr. Dan Blazer of Duke’s Department of Psychiatry, a senior author of the study.

The findings, based on analysis of confidential federal surveys of 72,561 adolescents ages 12 to 17 from 2005 through 2008, were released Monday and appear in the November issue of the journal Archives of General Psychiatry.

About 9 percent of the white teenagers in the study sample used substances in ways that indicated they had disorders, meaning abuse or dependency. That’s nearly twice the percentage of blacks nearly three times the rate for a group classified as Asian/Pacific Islander, which were mostly Asians.. The prevalence of disorders was by far highest among Native Americans, at 15 percent.

And this has actually been the truth for a long time now.  A steady dependency on drugs or alcohol requires money and the reality of abuse in more affluent suburbia as compared to the inner city has been a problem for a long time.  It’s far worse on America’s reservations and tribal lands, however.  That’s been the case for an even longer time, and what’s selling to a lot of teens is still the drugs of choice for many Americans provided by corporate America: alcohol and tobacco.
It’s nice to pretend it’s just a problem in the hood, I guess.
FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « You’ll also want to vote on voting rights, because you’re good and decent people
Next Post: Liar, Liar »

Reader Interactions

56Comments

  1. 1.

    Mark S.

    November 8, 2011 at 10:05 am

    The punch line:

    Given the strength of the data, the findings should give policymakers firm facts to use in making decisions about how to better tackle drug problems among kids, Blazer said.

    Did he say that right after taking a big bong rip? Because policy makers have never given a fuck about facts or research when it comes to Our Glorious War on (Some) Drugs and (Some) Drug Users. The goal has always been to destroy the 4th Amendment and put undesirables in prison.

  2. 2.

    burnspbesq

    November 8, 2011 at 10:05 am

    And it’s not just alcohol. The well-documented heroin epidemic in the high schools of Plano, Texas in the late 1990s is just one example.

  3. 3.

    cleek

    November 8, 2011 at 10:08 am

    It’s nice to pretend it’s just a problem in the hood, I guess.

    everyone needs to feel superior to someone.

  4. 4.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 8, 2011 at 10:08 am

    Is this a reflection of the banality of life in the suburbs? The kids seemly having a need to escape the reality of their surroundings?

  5. 5.

    jibeaux

    November 8, 2011 at 10:08 am

    Ha, there’s an ad for Herman Cain (he wants $990,000) coming up for me with this post. Like I’m going to give him money, he’d just spend it on hookers and blow.

  6. 6.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 8, 2011 at 10:10 am

    @jibeaux:

    Like I’m going to give him money, he’d just spend it on hookers and blow.

    The guy used to be a CEO. That’s what they do, you know.

  7. 7.

    Social Outcast

    November 8, 2011 at 10:11 am

    Who has been pretending that white suburban teens don’t do drunks or have alcohol issues? A few stepford wives maybe, but certainly not TV or the news media, which have been doing stories about this for decades.

    I don’t get the angle here. The stereotype about black or hispanic kids in urban neighborhoods is that they all sell drugs and shoot each other. As Mallory Archer once noted, “All they do is drive around listening to raps and shooting all the jobs!”

  8. 8.

    GregB

    November 8, 2011 at 10:12 am

    This is a reverse high tech lynching.

  9. 9.

    Commenting at Ballon Juice since 1937

    November 8, 2011 at 10:12 am

    All the addicts getting busted for prescription pain killers and heroin around me are white.

  10. 10.

    schrodinger's cat

    November 8, 2011 at 10:13 am

    To no one’s great surprise Bobo is pimping Romney in his NYT column this morning.

  11. 11.

    Plantsmantx

    November 8, 2011 at 10:13 am

    You were right in saying “If you asked people…”. A lot of black people are just as likely to believe it’s only a problem in the “hood”, and are just as resistant to accepting the truth of the matter.

  12. 12.

    SBJules

    November 8, 2011 at 10:13 am

    @jibeaux:

    Anyone given to “poor” Herman yet?

  13. 13.

    Samara Morgan

    November 8, 2011 at 10:16 am

    @schrodinger’s cat: but Erick the son of Erik is NOT.
    Mitt Romney as the Nominee: Conservatism Dies and Barack Obama Wins

    this is so great.
    :)

  14. 14.

    DougJ

    November 8, 2011 at 10:17 am

    Very interesting, not that surprising for the reasons you outline but very interesting.

  15. 15.

    The Other Bob

    November 8, 2011 at 10:18 am

    I am reminded of a study (which I cannot find) on teenage pregnancy that has similar results. Suburban girls are more likely to get pregnant. Also, they are more likely to have an abortion, so I suppose less people notice.

  16. 16.

    Brian R.

    November 8, 2011 at 10:21 am

    See also “The Lost Children of Rockdale County.”

  17. 17.

    Samara Morgan

    November 8, 2011 at 10:23 am

    @The Other Bob: i think it was evangelical christian girls…i’ll go look.

  18. 18.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 8, 2011 at 10:24 am

    @Samara Morgan:

    The comments there are equally interesting.

    These assholes are seriously deluded.

  19. 19.

    ruemara

    November 8, 2011 at 10:24 am

    I went to school in suburbia. The only people I knew who took drugs were the white kids. The lower socioeco kids, we had shit to do. Work after school, parents that would kill us, pray over us for resurrection and kill us again if we were so much as drunk. Nice to see science catching up with the facts.

  20. 20.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    November 8, 2011 at 10:25 am

    @Social Outcast: I believe the point of this is that the fact that there are a whole lot more blacks in prison for doing drugs than whites even though they are using them a lot less.

  21. 21.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 8, 2011 at 10:25 am

    @Samara Morgan:

    Paging abstinence spokesmodel Bristol Palin.

  22. 22.

    burnspbesq

    November 8, 2011 at 10:26 am

    @Samara Morgan:

    The first comment succinctly gets to the heart of what is at stake in 2012: the possibility of as many as four Supreme Court vacancies in the next Presidential term.

  23. 23.

    cervantes

    November 8, 2011 at 10:27 am

    This is well known and has been found again and again. But Black and Hispanic kids are far more likely — by an order of magnitude — to be prosecuted for drug offenses, and when they are, they get much more severe penalties. White kids taking drugs may be seen as a problem, but not as a crime. If the cops catch them, they just confiscate the pot (probably for their own use or for resale), whereas black kids go to court.

    This is a national scandal that nobody seems to care about.

  24. 24.

    Samara Morgan

    November 8, 2011 at 10:27 am

    @The Other Bob: Christian girls are more likely to get pregnant as teens. Most christian girls live in suburbia.
    red sex blue sex
    southern christian states

  25. 25.

    Poopyman

    November 8, 2011 at 10:32 am

    @burnspbesq: Well then we’re fucked since they need to be confirmed in the Senate, which will be less Democratic* than it is now.

    (Small “d” Democratic would work here as well, methinks.)

  26. 26.

    Yevgraf

    November 8, 2011 at 10:34 am

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    Is this a reflection of the banality of life in the suburbs? The kids seemly having a need to escape the reality of their surroundings?

    But all those exurban McManse-dwelling MILFs have such nicely manicured yards, perky plastic enhanced tits and they’ve decorated so nicely. Plus, their secretary banging, compulsively gambling, paper shoving husbands are such fine catches, at least according to all the ladies at the exurban megachurch they attend. Whocouldathunk that their kids would be disconnected?

  27. 27.

    Samara Morgan

    November 8, 2011 at 10:35 am

    @burnspbesq: i do not believe the GOP can field a candidate that can beat Obama.
    even if they go to a brokered convention.
    what is the chance that a brokered candidate can beat any incumbent?

    all our side has to do is get out the vote.
    if blacks and hispanics vote for Obama in the same percentages as in 2008, the GOP will need an impossible 65% of the white vote to win.
    i think it cant be done.

  28. 28.

    cleek

    November 8, 2011 at 10:36 am

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    The kids seemly having a need to escape the reality of their surroundings?

    any escape might help to smooth
    the unattractive truth
    that the suburbs have no charms to soothe
    the restless dreams of youth

  29. 29.

    Social Outcast

    November 8, 2011 at 10:39 am

    @Belafon (formerly anonevent): The prison issue is tied into the nature of the drug trade and the government’s law enforcement approach to drugs, which the study doesn’t address. It’s looking at who has a substance abuse problem, and aside from a few stepford moms, I can’t think of anyone who isn’t aware that white suburban kids do drugs and drink. Even when I was a kid 30 years ago there was all kinds of talk about the need to keep drugs out of the schools and raise penalties for serving alcohol to minors and having to cut down on drunk driving because of the need to protect the children, etc.

    He’s talking about a perception that hasn’t existed for decades.

  30. 30.

    jh

    November 8, 2011 at 10:39 am

    African-American from the ‘hood here.

    Growing up seeing junkies and winos every single day is strong disencentive to mess with the stuff. I don’t drink alcohol to this day.

    Knew a few people who sold drugs, but no one from my generation (Gen X/Y) would dare use them. Most of their customers were older blacks or white.

    Drug and Alcohol abuse was viewed as something for the olds who were, walking, talking, suffering advertisements for temperance.

    That and the fact that we knew there was a limited safety net (read: hellish, state run rehab) if we got strung out on something.

    Few if any, of my white college friends had the benefit of my experience.

  31. 31.

    cleek

    November 8, 2011 at 10:44 am

    A steady dependency on drugs or alcohol requires money and the reality of abuse in more affluent suburbia as compared to the inner city has been a problem for a long time.

    let’s all take a second to note that the article says nothing about affluence or suburbia or inner cities. it talks about race.

  32. 32.

    jayjaybear

    November 8, 2011 at 10:45 am

    o/` She goes running for the shelter
    of her mother’s little helper… o/`

    Because prescription-medication addiction isn’t the same thing as junkies, after all…

  33. 33.

    Trabb's Boy

    November 8, 2011 at 10:57 am

    None of this is surprising. The whole point of the war on drugs was to protect middle-class white kids from the scourge of drugs by making them more expensive, discouraging use. The fact that this increases profits and lures poorer people into dealing was probably originally a matter of indifference. The inevitable violence then “confirmed” racist views about those evil ghetto kids who have to be stomped on or they’ll keep finding ways to get drugs to “our” babies.

    I’m assuming Native Americans are stuck in the same inhalant nightmare as the First Nations folks here in Canada. It’s not the same issue, because it doesn’t deal with illegal substances.

  34. 34.

    Neldob

    November 8, 2011 at 11:09 am

    Addiction is a problem where I live, and probably linked to mental illness, depression, bipolar, etc. People don’t pay enough attention to mental illness. Parents are blind-sided by it, but it’s prevalence is close to 10%. Children think they’re immune to serious shit.

  35. 35.

    burnspbesq

    November 8, 2011 at 11:10 am

    @Yevgraf:

    Stereotype much?

  36. 36.

    Mattminus

    November 8, 2011 at 11:17 am

    I dunno. Maybe black kids are more distrustful of authority (for good reason) and less likely to admit to drug abuse on a survey?

  37. 37.

    schlemizel

    November 8, 2011 at 11:17 am

    COME ON! We all ‘know’ its the black kids that sell the drugs. That they have hooked the nice, clean white kids is just part of the international Jewish/Communist conspiracy using black foot soldiers.

    – For the humor impaired, the above is sarcasm.

  38. 38.

    Keith

    November 8, 2011 at 11:19 am

    Newsflash: White people are crazy!

  39. 39.

    Brachiator

    November 8, 2011 at 11:19 am

    Good post, but this,

    That’s been the case for an even longer time, and what’s selling to a lot of teens is still the drugs of choice for many Americans provided by corporate America: alcohol and tobacco.

    This is simpleminded idiocy.

  40. 40.

    PurpleGirl

    November 8, 2011 at 11:38 am

    @Samara Morgan:

    Christian girls are more likely to get pregnant as teens. Most christian girls live in suburbia.

    Where the hell do you get that idea? Christian girls live in all sizes of cities — urban, suburban and rural. I know you claim you were raised Catholic but you’re one bigoted person.

  41. 41.

    Brachiator

    November 8, 2011 at 11:39 am

    If you asked people whether they believed black teenagers or white teenagers were more likely to end up in a drug or alcohol dependency/abuse situation, I’m betting it would be the opposite of the results of a new extremely broad Duke University study on the subject.

    Scientific American and a couple of other magazines and web sites have had a very useful series of articles dealing with intelligent ways to interpret data, using Sherlock Holmes as an example (Holmesian Deduction)

    A recent Scientific American article, for example, used Holmesian logic as an example of how not to make several common fallacies of thinking, falling for the conjunction fallacy, the representativeness heuristic, and failure to consider the base rate.
    __
    Briefly, we tend to assume that someone belongs to a category if they have features we find representative of that category, or if we can readily bring to mind similar examples. We tend not to consider the base rate, what percentage of the relevant population belongs to that category. Sherlock Holmes encapsulated part of this idea with his famous quip to Watson that if you hear clopping on a cobblestone street in London, think horse, not zebra. This principle is common in medical diagnosis, and in fact we call rare diseases (those with a low base rate) “zebras” after Holmes’ example. In other words, even if a person has signs and symptoms that resemble a specific disease, the probability of that diagnosis is still low if the base rate is very low, it’s a rare disease. In fact, an atypical presentation of a very common disease may be more likely than a typical presentation of a rare disease.
    __
    But we tend to be more compelled by the representativeness of a person or situation than the base rate. Our evolved innate calculations of probability are flawed in this way.
    __
    The article also discusses the conjunction fallacy, the tendency to think that two likely conclusions are more likely that either alone. Mathematically, this cannot be true: the probability of A+B must be less than the probability of either A or B. This is easy enough to understand, but we tend to ignore this when confronted with a representative example. For example, if I describe for you a typical nerd and ask about the probability that they work in IT and play video games, your naive logic tells you that the probability of both is greater than the probability of either by itself, because they are both representative of the typical nerd.

    The results of the Duke study become less surprising if you can clear out the noise of expectations and stereotypes.

    Along these lines, a recent study about junk food is equally counter intuitive. The lazy assumption is that poor people eat more junk food than other folks. But, according to a new study, As income rises, so does fast-food consumption, study finds

    The conventional wisdom goes something like this: Obesity rates are skyrocketing among the poorest Americans, therefore fast-food restaurants must be to blame.
    __
    But a new study by a professor at UC Davis’ medical school has found that it’s Americans with salaries at the higher end of the spectrum, in some cases as high as $80,000 to $90,000, who are driving fast-food consumption at the likes of McDonald’s and Burger King.
    __
    “There’s a strong correlation been income and obesity,” professor Paul Leigh told The Times. “And so people say, ‘Oh, well, it’s the fast-food restaurants that are causing obesity among the poor.’ But that’s not true. To focus on fast-food restaurants as the sole cause of obesity is incorrect.”
    __
    The professor of health economics said the study of the dining habits of about 5,000 Americans found that as a household’s income increased, so did visits to chain fast-food restaurants such as McDonald’s. (That dropped dramatically, however, as income went even higher, presumably because the high-income types can hire cooks or afford to eat at restaurants with tablecloths.)
    __
    The research is to be published in a coming issue of the journal Population Health Management.

    Food for thought.

  42. 42.

    Enhanced Voting Techniques

    November 8, 2011 at 11:46 am

    The story I always heard was poor blacks get to see what drug abuse does to you in graphic detail which keeps them away. The problem is drug pushing is one of the few ways poor blacks can make a living and drug pushers tend to get hooked on their own stuff because they handle it all the time.

  43. 43.

    Jessica

    November 8, 2011 at 11:56 am

    Makes perfect sense to me. If an instance of drug use has a greater likelihood of resulting in arrest for non-whites than whites, non-whites are less likely to use because the risk is too high/whites are more likely to use because they think they’ll get away with it.

  44. 44.

    Jessica

    November 8, 2011 at 11:56 am

    Makes perfect sense to me. If an instance of drug use has a greater likelihood of resulting in arrest for non-whites than whites, non-whites are less likely to use because the risk is too high/whites are more likely to use because they think they’ll get away with it.

  45. 45.

    John X.

    November 8, 2011 at 11:58 am

    I’m glad ya’ll already knew this, but this doesn’t change the fact that 75 percent of incarcerated drug offenders are black. It seems someone didn’t get the memo that the drug war should be fought in the mansions and suburbs.

  46. 46.

    Neldob

    November 8, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    Is there any correlation with jail and drug use? Does it mean we should put more white youth in jail?

  47. 47.

    cckids

    November 8, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    @ruemara:

    The only people I knew who took drugs were the white kids.

    Yes. Here in S. NV, the high schools with the biggest drug/alcohol problems are the private/religious ones. Mostly, I think, because that is where the money is.

  48. 48.

    The Ancient Randonneur

    November 8, 2011 at 12:50 pm

    It’s hard out here for a middle class white kid.

  49. 49.

    Quaker in a Basement

    November 8, 2011 at 1:00 pm

    Other dudes are living in the ghetto
    But born in Pacific Heights don’t seem much betto
    We’re white punks on dope

  50. 50.

    jake the snake

    November 8, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    I think your sarcasm detector needs some work.

  51. 51.

    rikryah

    November 8, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    this is obvious. Most non-White kids have seen the ravages of drug abuse first hand. there is no six-degrees of separation for them. they don’t have much experience with someone on drugs doing 2 or 3 stints in rehab. they have seen the drugs ravage the addict and the family.

    and Bravo, JohnX

  52. 52.

    lou

    November 8, 2011 at 4:18 pm

    If you look at school discipline data, this would not surprise anyone. Whites are caught with drugs at a higher rate than blacks at school and suspended more often for it. Whites and blacks are caught at the same rate carrying weapons.

    Blacks get into trouble for things like “defying authority.” but that’s a whole different topic.

  53. 53.

    Baron Jrod of Keeblershire

    November 8, 2011 at 5:19 pm

    @Social Outcast:

    Who has been pretending that white suburban teens don’t do drunks or have alcohol issues?

    Police and prosecutors.

    The prison issue is tied into the nature of the drug trade and the government’s law enforcement approach to drugs, which the study doesn’t address.

    Oh, well then. I guess the fact that drug laws are most strictly enforced against blacks and hispanics in black and hispanic neighborhoods isn’t a problem then. Because somehow the “nature of the drug trade” is that only those people are selling the drugs. In the suburbs. Sure.

    @rikryah:

    this is obvious. Most non-White kids have seen the ravages of drug abuse first hand. there is no six-degrees of separation for them. they don’t have much experience with someone on drugs doing 2 or 3 stints in rehab. they have seen the drugs ravage the addict and the family.

    So, your contention is that blacks do less drugs than whites because… so many blacks do drugs that black kids have seen the terrible effects. Um. And on the flipside, the reason so many whites do drugs is because so few whites do drugs.

    We have differing definitions of “obvious” I think. For example, I think its obvious that you are clinging to racist assumptions about who is doing drugs in this country even though the Duke study we’re discussing states flat out that those racist assumptions aren’t true. Fucking check yourself.

    EDIT: I just want to make one thing clear: the truth is that most Americans, regardless of race, have seen the effects of drug abuse and addiction first hand. At least, this is true as long as you include alcohol as a drug, like you should.

  54. 54.

    xian

    November 8, 2011 at 5:48 pm

    @Samara Morgan: it is amusing that Erick states repeatedly that the public does not like Obama when that’s patently false.

  55. 55.

    AA+ Bonds

    November 8, 2011 at 6:29 pm

    It’s taken for granted that college years will involve drug use.

  56. 56.

    moderateindy

    November 9, 2011 at 12:30 am

    From a drug abuse standpoint, crack hit minority communities much harder than more affluent white communities, and when people think of drug addicts they think of crack heads, and heroin junkies (and now Meth addicts) So there might be a bit of an inclination to think that minorities had a bigger problem with addiction. Of course even a little scrutiny would lead you to the conclusion that kids with more cash are going to be more likely to have substance abuse problems.
    Interestingly enough, is the fact that meth is doing to poor rural America what crack did to the inner-city in the 80’s. The kids from suburbia still have enough money to abuse pot, coke, prescription pills and the like, all the drugs that people don’t view as hard drugs. So they still aren’t perceived as having a “serious” problem. Of course meth, like crack is ridiculously addictive and seriously debilitating, so it’s a lot easier to tell who is a meth freak, then it is to tell that someone is dependent on something like vicodin. Perception is not the same as reality.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - JanieM - Fall Color 8
Image by JanieM (11/8/25)

Recent Comments

  • Jay on He Really Is Anti-Woke (Nov 8, 2025 @ 11:16pm)
  • Melancholy Jaques on He Really Is Anti-Woke (Nov 8, 2025 @ 11:15pm)
  • Adam L Silverman on War for Ukraine Day 1,353: Russia Bombards Ukrainian Civilian Energy Infrastructure (Nov 8, 2025 @ 11:13pm)
  • hells littlest angel on He Really Is Anti-Woke (Nov 8, 2025 @ 11:13pm)
  • Jackie on Saturday Evening Open Thread: The Shutdown Tango (Tangle) (Nov 8, 2025 @ 11:09pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Upcoming Meetups

Virginia Meetup on Oct 11 please RSVP

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!