• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Not all heroes wear capes.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

The words do not have to be perfect.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

No one could have predicted…

An almost top 10,000 blog!

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

I was promised a recession.

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Why did Dr. Oz lose? well, according to the exit polls, it’s because Fetterman won.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Paging Joe Lieberman

Paging Joe Lieberman

by $8 blue check mistermix|  November 8, 20117:40 am| 74 Comments

This post is in: I wish a motherfucker would!

FacebookTweetEmail

Two guys walk into an international conference–stop me if you’ve heard this one–and discuss Binny Netanyahu:

“I cannot stand him. He’s a liar,” Sarkozy told Obama. The US president responded by saying: “You’re fed up with him? I have to deal with him every day.”

Neither leader apparently realised that microphones that had been attached for a press conference had already been switched on, allowing journalists waiting for a press conference to hear the conversation.

Obama was in the process of reaming Sarkozi for not warning him that the French were going to vote to let the Palestinians into UNESCO when this Kinsley gaffe happened.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Ask Me, I Won’t Say No, How Could I?
Next Post: Union Busting is Disgusting »

Reader Interactions

74Comments

  1. 1.

    schlemizel

    November 8, 2011 at 7:44 am

    Oh Christ, now we are going to have to hear a litany of “Obama hates Israel” and other bullshit like that.

    Is there any other country on earth that allows its own foreign policy to be driven against its better interests and to the interests of one political party in a different nation?

  2. 2.

    Ecks

    November 8, 2011 at 7:47 am

    Could be worse.

  3. 3.

    mikefromArlington

    November 8, 2011 at 7:48 am

    That like saying your a racist because you call Obama a liar…to the person above.

  4. 4.

    JGabriel

    November 8, 2011 at 7:49 am

    Guardian UK:

    “I cannot stand him [Netanyahu]. He’s a liar,” Sarkozy told Obama. The US president responded by saying: “You’re fed up with him? I have to deal with him every day.”

    Good. It’s time Israel understands how Netanyahu is perceived internationally.

    The man is a manipulative self-serving right-wing jackass*. I support Israel, but not Likud or Netanyahu.

    *Sorry for quadruple-redundancy.

    .

  5. 5.

    Raven (formerly stuckinred)

    November 8, 2011 at 7:53 am

    Big Dawg comin up with Mika!

  6. 6.

    Mino

    November 8, 2011 at 7:55 am

    Netanyahu is such a twister. An evil, evil man. He glows with it. I can’t stand him. HE has made me anti-Israeli for the present.

  7. 7.

    Samara Morgan

    November 8, 2011 at 7:56 am

    @JGabriel: i dont think you understand how awkward this UNESCO member thing is for Obama.
    It means the Palestinians can sue Israel in international courts for building illegal settlements.

  8. 8.

    Samara Morgan

    November 8, 2011 at 7:58 am

    @Mino: the Israelis have become what they most despised. they are waging war on children.

  9. 9.

    JGabriel

    November 8, 2011 at 7:59 am

    @Mino:

    Netanyahu is such a twister. … HE has made me anti-Israeli for the present.

    Don’t go there. That’s like agreeing with Republicans that you’re anti-American if you’re anti-GOP. Anti-Likud is not anti-Israel.

    .

  10. 10.

    YellowJournalism

    November 8, 2011 at 8:01 am

    Obama just needs to inappropriately massage the shoulders of a few heads of state, then instead of a gaffe it will show how “real” he is.

    As for the Naked Gun clip, I’ve been told a few times of that actually happening to people. It’s way too easy to foprget the mic.

  11. 11.

    Maude

    November 8, 2011 at 8:03 am

    @Raven (formerly stuckinred):
    Morning, I’d rephrase the word comin.

  12. 12.

    JGabriel

    November 8, 2011 at 8:04 am

    @Samara Morgan:

    It means the Palestinians can sue Israel in international courts for building illegal settlements.

    I don’t like to get into the details much on the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, because it generally just stirs up shit when the focus needs to be on resolving shit.

    That said, I don’t necessarily see a problem with the Palestinians being able to sue Israel over illegal settlements in the West Bank. Israel is trying to improve it’s bargaining position by creating new georgraphical facts on the ground, and the Palestinians should have a process available to call them on it.

    .

  13. 13.

    Mino

    November 8, 2011 at 8:04 am

    Does anybody think today’s Israelis would be bound by a decision of an international court. Ha!

  14. 14.

    James

    November 8, 2011 at 8:09 am

    It’s going to be a fun fun White House briefing today, methinks. If you aren’t addicted to the daily show of Carney versus the Clowns, you otta be.

    The man is a manipulative self-serving right-wing jackass*.

    This. Well, Sarko is also a jackass, but at least the entire US Congress isn’t required to kiss his ring every day.

  15. 15.

    chopper

    November 8, 2011 at 8:10 am

    obama will get shit for this, but he’s completely a-fuckin right at least.

    it’s like being overheard saying that ‘water is really fuckin wet’.

  16. 16.

    MattF

    November 8, 2011 at 8:12 am

    Well, I imagine that the Likud-in-DC bloc will get their hopes up that, maybe this time, Jews will abandon Obama, and then be disappointed again.

  17. 17.

    shortstop

    November 8, 2011 at 8:14 am

    Netanyahu already knows damned well how he’s perceived internationally, JGabriel. This incident isn’t suddenly going to make him see the light that the reason for that is his own actions, rather than his perpetual “victimhood” at the hands of the whole world minus the American right.

  18. 18.

    deep cap

    November 8, 2011 at 8:19 am

    Sorry, but that makes you an anti Semite.

    Criticizing Israel makes you an anti Semite.
    Criticizing Likud makes you an anti Semite.
    Criticizing Netanyahu makes you an anti Semite.
    Criticizing Joe Lieberman makes you an anti Semite.
    Questioning America’s relationship with Israel makes you an anti Semite.

    You can’t win.

  19. 19.

    James Hare

    November 8, 2011 at 8:22 am

    Doesn’t seem like so much a gaffe as bad planning by the folks handling the translation. They told Sarkozy and Obama that people wouldn’t be able to listen and then told the reporters “we won’t give you headsets till we’re ready.” The reporters did what reporters do — tried to find a way around that.

    Why should it be news these guys don’t like Netanyahu? I thought it was pretty clear from every time I’ve seen him with other world leaders that they’re uncomfortable even being on the stage with him.

  20. 20.

    beltane

    November 8, 2011 at 8:24 am

    I also can’t stand Netanyahu and think he’s a liar. Today we are all Nicholas Sarkozy.

  21. 21.

    cleek

    November 8, 2011 at 8:26 am

    the ijits at NRO are all upset about the fact that the journalists agreed to not report what was said (even though, it has obviously been reported). they’re mad that W never got such treatment. wah!

  22. 22.

    WereBear

    November 8, 2011 at 8:29 am

    ALL MIKES ARE LIVE.

    Period. That’s how I was taught… and you can never go wrong that way.

  23. 23.

    4tehlulz

    November 8, 2011 at 8:30 am

    Inb4 Politico vapors about Obama losing the Jewish vote.

  24. 24.

    barath

    November 8, 2011 at 8:32 am

    @James:

    Is Carney good? I’ve never watched his briefings, but I hope he’s better than Gibbs.

  25. 25.

    schlemizel

    November 8, 2011 at 8:35 am

    @Samara Morgan:

    Maybe that would be an alternative to suicide bombings – perhaps it will be the road out for both parties.

    Hey! Look everybody – I’m seeing a ray of actual sunshine here. Mr. gloom-n-doom thinks maybe UN membership would actually HELP solve the issue.

    That would explain why the GOP & Likud are against it.

  26. 26.

    schlemizel

    November 8, 2011 at 8:36 am

    @WereBear:

    I actually went to broadcast school in the 70s & they drilled that into our heads every day. All mics are always live!

  27. 27.

    shortstop

    November 8, 2011 at 8:41 am

    All mics are live and the guns are always loaded.

  28. 28.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    November 8, 2011 at 8:43 am

    We had a whole discussion of the translation earlier here, and the Guardian’s version is the worst yet. At least going by the what was reported in French, which was already translated from English and on and on so who knows.

    Yeah I know a little kerning-y but yeesh.

  29. 29.

    James

    November 8, 2011 at 8:47 am

    @barath: Oh, yeah. It’s one of the best shows on your teevee! I couldn’t stand Gibbs, thought he was THE worst presssec in history, and I had a very dim view of Jay Carney, having sparred with him blogwise in the past. But I tells ya, he is one. great. pressec. Really, watch a couple for yourself.

  30. 30.

    Feudalism Now!

    November 8, 2011 at 8:47 am

    This may be another accidentally- on purpose gaffe. Binny Net and Likud are the biggest hurdle to a lasting Palestinian-Israeli peace. To move forward they need to be marginalized. The UNESCO vote was one path, labeling Binny/Likud as untrustworthy partners is another. The American press will cover this as an Obama stumble, but the European press is going to dig deeper to bring the lies to the surface, even if it is only to distract themselves from the Euro/Greece meltdown.

  31. 31.

    Cacti

    November 8, 2011 at 8:48 am

    I can’t believe that no one has mentioned what good news this is for John McCain.

  32. 32.

    gelfling545

    November 8, 2011 at 8:49 am

    @deep cap: One is reminded a bit of one’s adolescent children screaming “You hate me!” as you try to keep them from flushing their lives down the porcelain convenience.

  33. 33.

    arguingwithsignposts

    November 8, 2011 at 8:49 am

    @James:

    thought he was THE worst presssec in historym

    ORLY?
    Worse than Ari Fleischer? Worse than Scott McClelland? Worse than Dana Perino??

    Let’s have a little perspective, please.

  34. 34.

    JPL

    November 8, 2011 at 8:50 am

    What I would like Carney to say…

    Carney: The President has no direct knowledge that Netanyahu lied to Sarkozy.
    Media: But, but…
    Carney: The President deals with issues about Israel every day. End of Story…

  35. 35.

    Barry

    November 8, 2011 at 8:53 am

    @Mino: “Does anybody think today’s Israelis would be bound by a decision of an international court. Ha!”

    The threat is that twenty years down the line, anybody who bought the seized land could have their assets in other countries messed with.

    Sorta like the USA and Cuba. Which of course, is totally different :)

  36. 36.

    James

    November 8, 2011 at 8:54 am

    @arguingwithsignposts: As pressecs go, Ari was very effective, and Dana Perino was a smooth operator. She held those little press puppies in the palm of her hand. McClellan wasn’t that swift. Just because they were bushies, doesn’t mean they weren’t good, and effective, at what they did.

  37. 37.

    James

    November 8, 2011 at 9:02 am

    @JPL:

    What I would like Carney to say…

    Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends
    We’re so glad you could attend
    Come inside! Come inside!
    There behind a glass is a real blade of grass
    be careful as you pass
    Move along! Move along!

    Come inside, the show’s about to start
    guaranteed to blow your head apart
    Rest assured you’ll get your money’s worth
    The greatest show in Heaven, Hell or Earth
    You’ve got to see the show, it’s a dynamo
    You’ve got to see the show, it’s rock and roll …

    Bring your popcorn, too.

  38. 38.

    Mino

    November 8, 2011 at 9:04 am

    Hey, if this gets his panties in a twist, it’s all good. It might delay the attack on Iran or keep us out of it.

  39. 39.

    arguingwithsignposts

    November 8, 2011 at 9:10 am

    @James: We’ll just have to agree to disagree on this one. Perino, especially, who didn’t even know what the Cuban Missile Crisis was.

    I don’t judge the effectiveness of a press sec’y based on how well he/she stonewalls. Gibbs wasn’t the best, but he damned sure wasn’t in Perino territory.

  40. 40.

    Steve

    November 8, 2011 at 9:17 am

    Anti-Netanyahu is not anti-Israel any more than anti-Obama is anti-American. In fact, Netanyahu isn’t even the head of state. People are so dumb.

  41. 41.

    Suffern ACE

    November 8, 2011 at 9:17 am

    Oh great. Now Benny is going to need to give another speech so the the Congress can show just how much they really love him. It will need to have 20,000 standing ovations this time, lest anyone be caught on not clapping.

  42. 42.

    James

    November 8, 2011 at 9:18 am

    @arguingwithsignposts: It wasn’t exactly a bad thing, from the bushie perspective, that his petite, blond, good-looking, extremely well-dressed press secretary was, um, not that smart. In fact, it was a big plus.

    I guess we will differ on how to judge the effectiveness of presidential press secretaries, then.

    Cheers.

  43. 43.

    OzoneR

    November 8, 2011 at 9:19 am

    @JGabriel:

    That’s like agreeing with Republicans that you’re anti-American if you’re anti-GOP. Anti-Likud is not anti-Israel.

    depends, I know people overseas who were not rooting for America to succeed when Bush was President but did in the 90s and are now.

  44. 44.

    Social Outcast

    November 8, 2011 at 9:21 am

    Unlike Obama, Mitt Romney would be able to deal with Binny using his awesome powers of being agreeable to whatever the right wing in Israel wants. In fact, Romney would be able to tell Binny that he is not only now jewish, he has been consistently jewish even while being a morman. Any reports to the contrary are due to the fact that people don’t understand nuance.

  45. 45.

    Hill Dweller

    November 8, 2011 at 9:22 am

    Clinton despised Netanyahu. Hell, from everything I’ve read, to know Netanyahu is to despise Netanyahu.

  46. 46.

    Cacti

    November 8, 2011 at 9:23 am

    @Social Outcast:

    I wonder if Bibi knows that Mitt believes the New Jerusalem will be built in Jackson County, Missouri.

  47. 47.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 8, 2011 at 9:27 am

    @schlemizel:

    That would explain why the GOP & Likud are against it.

    Both need the status quo…intractable hostility and conflict…for their own selfish reasons.

    It’s like Roe v. Wade…Rethugs talk about it all the time, but won’t do anything to really move forward on repealing it, because it would kill a lot of peasant fleecing.

  48. 48.

    PeakVT

    November 8, 2011 at 9:31 am

    @Steve: He’s the head of government, though, and that’s the position with power in parliamentary systems.

  49. 49.

    El Cid

    November 8, 2011 at 9:32 am

    Likud is not somehow uniquely responsible for Palestinian-crushing and land-stealing policies. It wasn’t Likud which leveled Gaza right before Obama’s inauguration, nor were they different in expandings settlements and their proxy seetc. Worse in other ways, though.

  50. 50.

    gogol's wife

    November 8, 2011 at 9:32 am

    @Cacti:

    Where I grew up. Yay, Jackson County.

  51. 51.

    RalfW

    November 8, 2011 at 9:39 am

    Obama was in the process of reaming Sarkozi for not warning him that the French were going to vote to let the Palestinians into UNESCO

    But Obama is an America-hating spineless failure with no foreign policy experience whatsoever. So surely it’s a figment of the librul imagination that Obama would ream anyone.

  52. 52.

    Chris

    November 8, 2011 at 9:40 am

    @El Cid:

    Likud is not somehow uniquely responsible for Palestinian-crushing and land-stealing policies. It wasn’t Likud which leveled Gaza right before Obama’s inauguration, nor were they different in expandings settlements and their proxy seetc. Worse in other ways, though.

    This.

    I’m sympathetic to the fact that not all Israelis are racist jackasses, but it’s also a little too easy to simply push it all on Likud.

  53. 53.

    El Cid

    November 8, 2011 at 9:40 am

    Blaming “Likud” as though Palestinian-related Israeli state policies were the fault of just an egregiously right wing racist and anti-democratic party is simply false. No major poliitical party in Israel offers any more than lip service to p.

  54. 54.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 8, 2011 at 9:54 am

    @El Cid:

    Unfortunately, Israeli policies in relation to the indigenous population from the beginning (all the way back before there was an Israel) were not all that different than American policies towards the indigenous population.

    Colonialism in the face of an existing population is never pretty.

  55. 55.

    Mary

    November 8, 2011 at 10:02 am

    @Bill E Pilgrim: It shouldn’t surprise and impress me that the President speaks French, but I have to admit that it does.

  56. 56.

    GregB

    November 8, 2011 at 10:23 am

    This is such an affront that Matt Drudge has been frontpaging this story for most of last night and still today.

    I love how the machismo minded right wing loves to smear people’s faces in shit but are so supine to Israel that a pathetic little slight like this would get them wound up.

    At least Sarko has some redeeming qualities.

  57. 57.

    Nemesis

    November 8, 2011 at 10:25 am

    A US president overtly hostile to Israel. Anything short of kissing the ground tread upon by Bebe will be interpreted by the rwnm as turning our collective backs on Israel, which couldnt be further from the truth.

    Bebe is a neocon asshole. He loves to create misery for Obama, but, of course, that cant be discussed in polite company.

  58. 58.

    dww44

    November 8, 2011 at 10:25 am

    @James: I agree about Gibbs. Indeed it was his performance from the get-go that made me realize that the administration was definitely not going to come out strong for progressive or liberal positions.

    Gibbs never seemed to do anything but waffle in his press conferences, and he took forever to make a point, or Not make one, as was the case much of the time. I could not stand to watch or listen to him. and, still can’t.

  59. 59.

    shortstop

    November 8, 2011 at 10:29 am

    @Suffern ACE: No kidding. I’m taking the day off teevee and the intertubes when all that goes down, lest I vomit copiously.

  60. 60.

    pete mack

    November 8, 2011 at 10:29 am

    This doesn’t sound like a gaffe at all: “please don’t plug in your earphones, Obama and Sarkozi are in private conversation.”

  61. 61.

    Davis X. Machina

    November 8, 2011 at 10:31 am

    Remind me again where the problem is.

    Netanyahu is a liar, and Obama does have to deal with him every day.

    Last time I looked, Obama was a law professor and the truth of an assertion is an airtight affirmative defense against a charge of libel.

  62. 62.

    Nemesis

    November 8, 2011 at 10:33 am

    @arguingwithsignposts: Tony Snow should be at the top of that list.

    Didnt he, during his first day as PS, state that racism in murika was over?

    Here are some other gems…
    http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/t/tony_snow.html

  63. 63.

    PeakVT

    November 8, 2011 at 10:35 am

    @Mary: I think the conversation was in English.

  64. 64.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    November 8, 2011 at 10:37 am

    [email protected]

    No I think he said it in English, and a French reporter heard it and wrote it in French. What he wrote though was not “You’re fed up with him?” with the question mark, which slants the meaning.

  65. 65.

    FlipYrWhig

    November 8, 2011 at 10:40 am

    @dww44:

    Gibbs never seemed to do anything but waffle in his press conferences, and he took forever to make a point, or Not make one, as was the case much of the time.

    Um, that’s the nature of the job. You’re nominally there to answer questions, but day to day you’re there to choose language carefully, be as noncommittal as possible, and otherwise work to shut up and shut down the stupid fucking lazy bastards who call themselves “The Press.”

  66. 66.

    DougJ

    November 8, 2011 at 10:48 am

    This is weird, I’m checking out the usual AIPAC outlets — Kaplan, TNR — and I haven’t seen anyone talking about this. Why?

  67. 67.

    Mary

    November 8, 2011 at 11:04 am

    @PeakVT: Gotcha…I was a little confused by the BBC report, which says:

    “I can’t stand him any more, he’s a liar,” Mr Sarkozy said in French.

    “You may be sick of him, but me, I have to deal with him every day,” Mr Obama replied.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15635476

  68. 68.

    MattF

    November 8, 2011 at 11:09 am

    @DougJ: Because they’d have to try to deny that Netanyahu is a liar. The “some” who would normally “say” are silent in this case.

  69. 69.

    PeakVT

    November 8, 2011 at 11:18 am

    @Mary: The articles aren’t clear, but I know Sarko speaks English, and I can find nothing about Obama speaking French.

  70. 70.

    El Cid

    November 8, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: Yes, but (a) the subject matter is Israel, (b) the Palestinians are actually suffering the effects of the entirely U.S.-backed Israeli state policies, and (c) if this is what you intended, it is an utterly irrelevant dodge to attempt to make such discussions about the hypocrisies of prior U.S. governments toward pre-Columbian residents of this continent.

    Israeli state policies are blowing the shit out of and stealing all the resources from and making a joke out of any future ‘state’ possible for the Palestinians, and no whining about how the US carried out barbarities against its own domestic population can change that, nor lessen the barbarities of Israeli policymakers.

    Believe it or not, it is in fact reasonable for people to come to conclusions about other nations’ policies without having to represent the nation-state within which they live as free of hypocrisy.

    Part of that can be to clearly state what is happening, and not do so within the political limits of one or more nation-states’ domestic political systems.

    So, those blaming ‘Likud’ for these Israeli state policies are correct only to the extent that they indicate an increase in barbarity and outright thievery, though the governing coalition has been impressive in moves to prioritize right wing religious fundamentalists, blunt racism, and the destruction of democratic rights and representation for Israeli Arab citizens.

    Please, unless someone appears to be making the point that US policies regarding its own indigenous populations are superior, keep the hypocrisy charge to relevant discussions.

  71. 71.

    dww44

    November 8, 2011 at 12:46 pm

    @FlipYrWhig: Maybe so, but his execution of that attribute left a lot to be desired IMO and mostly pissed off lots of people to his left. Those on the right weren’t going to change their minds anyways. A lesson that took the administration the first 2 1/2 years to assimilate. Still don’t care for Gibbs. He’s seems to stand for nothing, even after leaving the job for quite some time.

  72. 72.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 8, 2011 at 1:04 pm

    @El Cid:

    Oh, I’m not asserting that US polices are superior in any way, or less morally abhorrent.

    I’m asserting that the Israelis, even before the Likud cranked up the policies to 11, were following pretty much the US playbook on dealing with those creatures in the way of Manifest Destiny.

    Illegal settlements in the West Bank preceded the rise of the Likud to power in the 70’s.

    The Likud was a bit more upfront about the “Greater Israel” think that includes “Judea and Samaria” as part of the Zionist Homeland. You indigenous peoples, get thee to the “Palestinian Homeland” on the east bank of the River Jordan.

  73. 73.

    El Cid

    November 8, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: It’s not quite fair to blame Likud generically for turning it up to 11, since typically under Labor far more settlements were built than Likud.

    Mostly importantly, why not? Why would Israeli policymakers do anything else?

  74. 74.

    YellowJournalism

    November 8, 2011 at 8:20 pm

    I don’t know why, but it makes me smile to think that the President had the same conversation many of us have about our annoyoing coworkers when they’re pissing us off.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • J R in WV on Entertainment Open Thread: The Grammy Awards (Feb 6, 2023 @ 8:29pm)
  • zhena gogolia on War for Ukraine Day 347: Bakhmut, Vuhledar, and Waiting for the Next Offensive in the East (Feb 6, 2023 @ 8:29pm)
  • Skepticat on That Fucking Balloon (Feb 6, 2023 @ 8:28pm)
  • mvr on Interesting Read About Arizona (Open Thread) (Feb 6, 2023 @ 8:23pm)
  • oldster on War for Ukraine Day 347: Bakhmut, Vuhledar, and Waiting for the Next Offensive in the East (Feb 6, 2023 @ 8:23pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!