• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Relentless negativity is not a sign that you are more realistic.

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

The republican caucus is covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

Please don’t feed the bears.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

Happy indictment week to all who celebrate!

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” is supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

Chutkan laughs. Lauro sits back down.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

It’s pointless to bring up problems that can only be solved with a time machine.

Trump makes a mockery of the legal system and cowardly judges just sit back and let him.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2012 / Run, Willard, Run (Like the Gutless Coward You Are)

Run, Willard, Run (Like the Gutless Coward You Are)

by Anne Laurie|  November 15, 201110:50 am| 39 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012, Republican Venality, Romney of the Uncanny Valley

FacebookTweetEmail

Via Greg Sargent, David S. Bernstein at the Boston Phoenix has a Romney anecdote too good not to share:

The story comes from the Boston Globe’s seven-part 2007 series on the life of Romney. In Part 3, William Bain tells Romney that he and the Bain partners have chosen him to head a new spinoff company, Bain Capital:

In early spring of 1983, with the sun pouring into his office in the Faneuil Hall marketplace, Bain offered Romney the job that would make his career. Romney balked, catching Bain off guard.
__
Romney explained that he didn’t want to risk his position, earnings, and reputation on an experiment in investing. The offer was appealing, Romney recalled in a recent interview, but he wasn’t going to make such a decision in a “light or flippant manner.”
__
So Bain sweetened the offer. He guaranteed that if the experiment failed, Romney would get his old job and salary back, plus any raises handed out during his absence.
__
Romney had one more concern: the impact on his reputation should he prove unable to do the job. In the end, Bain agreed to craft a cover story if necessary, promising to bring Romney back to the consulting firm and explain Romney’s return as a matter of his being more valuable to Bain as a consultant.
__
“So,” Bain says, “there was no professional or financial risk.”

To me, this vignette perfectly gets to the core of Mitt Romney (not to mention the whole rigged game of American wealth and finance). Romney always leverages his considerable assets — his business and managerial skills, his personal access and influence, his wealth — to manipulate circumstances to avoid personal risk. And while that includes risk to his personal finances and professional career, the number-one goal is to protect, at all costs, the Mitt Romney brand…
__
Most striking about this Bain anecdote is the pre-arranged dishonesty — a conspiracy before the fact, so to speak, to lie and cover up for failure. He was already adept at the tactic back then, in his 30s, when his leverage and power was still relatively weak. I would argue that he has made similar arrangements at almost every step along his path. Of course, it’s very hard to tell whether people have agreed to lie on someone’s behalf or not. But it certainly seems that Romney has always been able to seize credit for successes, and avoid blame for problems…

Sterling character, that Romney fella — takes a mort of regular polishing to keep the tarnish off. Not so suprising that “most of Romney’s big early donors from his first presidential campaign have deserted him in his second“:

There is no single explanation for the desertion of more than 10,000 individuals — a potential loss of some $25 million to the campaign.
__
But one conclusion is inescapable: even among his supporters, there’s not much enthusiasm for a Romney presidency.
__
And that, according to his supporters and detractors alike, stems from Romney’s ever-changing persona. Whatever version of Romney you once supported, it’s not the same Romney who is asking for your money today…

Well worth clicking through, for much more detail at the link.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Things they do look awful c-c-cold
Next Post: This Week in Anyone But Romney »

Reader Interactions

39Comments

  1. 1.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 15, 2011 at 10:56 am

    “So,” Bain says, “there was no professional or financial risk.”

    How the fuck does this dumbfuck, who is such a coward, think that he can enter the world of politics where such things are simply not under your control anymore?

  2. 2.

    jibeaux

    November 15, 2011 at 11:04 am

    They’re in the Kubler-Ross stages right now, I would say currently in fairly protracted bargaining (Perry – Cain – soon to come: emerged….Gingrich! After that, I’m not sure. The donut of the month club to Christie’s house, probably), but moving, inexorably, towards Acceptance of Romney. And ironically, the decades of calculation applied so almost scientifically into crafting a shell for this hollow soul will be what brings him down.
    At least that’s the hope, anyway.

  3. 3.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    November 15, 2011 at 11:05 am

    But Obama keeps negotiating with the Republicans.
    /troll-fire-bagger

    Imagine four years of Mitt cowering in the corner.

  4. 4.

    JPL

    November 15, 2011 at 11:05 am

    The only thing I can assume is that if Romney were the President now, Osama would be alive. He certainly wouldn’t risk a failure.

  5. 5.

    PeakVT

    November 15, 2011 at 11:08 am

    @Villago Delenda Est: Fox and the media landscape it has re-made.

  6. 6.

    Culture of Truth

    November 15, 2011 at 11:08 am

    If this anecdote is true, it suggests this much: the guy is no fool, and gets what he wants.

  7. 7.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    November 15, 2011 at 11:15 am

    @Culture of Truth: He sounds an awful lot like the whiny SoS from Independence Day, who was lucky he didn’t get offered up as bait.

  8. 8.

    Zifnab

    November 15, 2011 at 11:19 am

    All the talent in the world and only Millard Romney has the brass tacks to lead Bain Capital. He was so incredibly talented that Bain was willing to eliminate even the shadow of the risk of failure in pre-exchange for Romney’s service. That’s how stellar and astounding Romney’s performance was expected to be.

    /Republican hand-job response

  9. 9.

    JGabriel

    November 15, 2011 at 11:21 am

    @Culture of Truth:

    If this anecdote is true, it suggests this much: the guy is no fool, and gets what he wants.

    It suggest Romney’s a perfect fit for the modern business world … and likely to make just as much a hash of the presidency as the last “businessman” we elected to the office.

    .

  10. 10.

    Culture of Truth

    November 15, 2011 at 11:23 am

    @Belafon (formerly anonevent): That guy converted to Judaism as aliens destroyed America, which sounds like a suitable denouement for Mitt

  11. 11.

    Willard

    November 15, 2011 at 11:25 am

    Oh neat. Well the deal at Bain is exactly how the presidency works. If he fails to perform, he gets to revert to being candidate Romney. The cover story will be that he is so much more valuable to the American people as a candidate.

    You know what, Romney is too valuable as to candidate to risk losing him to the presidency.

  12. 12.

    JGabriel

    November 15, 2011 at 11:25 am

    @jibeaux:

    Perry – Cain – soon to come: emerged….Gingrich! After that, I’m not sure.

    There’s still Paul, Santorum, and Huntsman.

    No, wait, Paul and Huntsman both announced themselves as anti-torture in the last debate.

    There’s still Santorum.

    .

  13. 13.

    Culture of Truth

    November 15, 2011 at 11:27 am

    What I mean is this – Rick Perry, Bachmann, Santorum, and Cain are useful idiots who inevitably get conned in Bain-like deal. Romney is the guy doing the con.

  14. 14.

    Enhanced Voting Techniques

    November 15, 2011 at 11:28 am

    So what does No Risks Willy plan to do about Iran? Negotiations might fail, war might fail, doing nothing might fail. There is a no risk free option on Iran and no one to blame.

    Presidentz Mittens = four years of blamestorming.

  15. 15.

    aimai

    November 15, 2011 at 11:31 am

    A) golf claps for correct use of my favorite expression “a mort of”.

    B) That’s our Mitt (he was my governor, after all) a fake and a coward right down to his wingtips.

    C) That’s why we in Massachusetts say that Mitt gives the words trimming, lickspittle, ass covering, and dishonest a run for their money.

    aimai

  16. 16.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 15, 2011 at 11:32 am

    @Willard:

    You mean the way his sons are more valuable as campaigners for their dad than campaigners in Iraq, putting their precious asses on the line?

  17. 17.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 15, 2011 at 11:33 am

    @Enhanced Voting Techniques:

    No matter what happens in Iran under a Romney administration, somehow Obama, Clinton, or Carter will be to blame.

  18. 18.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    November 15, 2011 at 11:36 am

    @Culture of Truth: I am surprised he hasn’t flip-flopped more on his Mormonism.

  19. 19.

    jibeaux

    November 15, 2011 at 11:42 am

    @JGabriel: Yeah, I have a hard time believing even Republican primary voters are really going to take a shine to him. His Senate gig looks like a fluke now, after he lost re-election by a margin of what, nearly twenty points? Charisma seems to be what’s driving them right now, and santorum ain’t got it. But I wouldn’t rule out reanimating Reagan’s corpse in there after the Christie donut thing and before Acceptance of Romney.

  20. 20.

    jl

    November 15, 2011 at 11:48 am

    I disagree. Finally, a criticism of a GOP presidentin’ primaryate I can disagree with.

    Dude, the riskless sinecure, the inside track, the trick, the bolt down a well paved and prepared career road (when the chance came up) with an eye on the main chance, that was SOP for bland white men for decades.

    Edit: Also, too: Willy Loman, American icon.

    It has gone away, and that is why so many of them are pissed.

    As a member of the club, I had plenty of corny white dudes lean over and tell me, confidentially, look all this school, idealism, research to find truth stuff, come on, it won’t pay. You have a chance to get a free ticket and ride, boy, you should take it.

    So, damn, I could be boozy middle age fart white guy with a big house and nervous wife in San Marino, golf at the country club, but I am a ridiculous person who never learned to put childish things away.

    On this one, leeeeaaavvvve Mitt allllloooooone! Please. He was following a cultural norm. Hard to believe, but the ways of the white male US duffer are strange.

  21. 21.

    catclub

    November 15, 2011 at 11:49 am

    @Belafon (formerly anonevent): He has flip-flopped exactly zero on his Mormonism. I give him full credit for that.(But I also allowed that a ‘profound conversion experience’ could still be in the cards if necessary.)

    I give George Bush full credit for not letting Cheney bomb Iran.

  22. 22.

    feebog

    November 15, 2011 at 11:57 am

    Isn’t the behavior described in this incident pretty much the template for the Banksters leading up to the 2007/08 crash? Take all the risks you want, the taxpayers via the good ol’ boy club that was the Bush Administration will cover your bets.

  23. 23.

    JustMe

    November 15, 2011 at 11:57 am

    Honestly, I can’t be down on Romney for this. He was being pretty shrewd and protective of his professional standing and wasn’t going to let anyone take advantage of him.

  24. 24.

    Zifnab

    November 15, 2011 at 11:59 am

    @catclub:

    I give George Bush full credit for not letting Cheney bomb Iran.

    Was that even Bush’s call? Or did half a dozen generals lead by Colin Powell drag GW Jr into a private room and explain to him what happens to Presidents that piss off the US military too much? Bombing Iran would have been a catastrophe. We were not ready to add another front to the Afghan/Iraq War.

  25. 25.

    burnspbesq

    November 15, 2011 at 11:59 am

    Anyone who finds this story surprising must never have worked in a private-sector enterprise with more than ten employees. Risk aversion is as natural as breathing.

  26. 26.

    Nutella

    November 15, 2011 at 12:03 pm

    Wow, that Bain story really clarifies the difference between the Masters of the Universe and us plebes: They have no financial or career risk at all. Only the little people have risk.

    Remember this when they tell us that CEOs have to be paid the big bucks because of ‘risk’.

    The receptionists and mail clerks living paycheck to paycheck until they get laid off by Bain: They’ve got risk.

  27. 27.

    Roger Moore

    November 15, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    @jibeaux:

    They’re in the Kubler-Ross stages right now, I would say currently in fairly protracted bargaining (Perry – Cain – soon to come: emerged….Gingrich! After that, I’m not sure. The donut of the month club to Christie’s house, probably), but moving, inexorably, towards Acceptance of Romney.

    If you think the bargaining stage is taking a long time, just wait till we get to Depression. I predict that for a lot of wingnuts, it will last until after November.

  28. 28.

    catclub

    November 15, 2011 at 12:19 pm

    @Zifnab: 1. Colin Powell was already gone.
    2. Those same generals always happened to end up doing what Bush wanted. Take needed resources from Afghanistan for the Iraq war buildup? Yes Boss. The surge, when the Generals wanted to start winding down? He finally found a general that wanted to do that and that one gets promoted, the others get fired.

    So yes, I give Bush the credit for not letting Cheney bomb Iran.

  29. 29.

    Judas Escargot

    November 15, 2011 at 12:19 pm

    @Nutella:

    Wow, that Bain story really clarifies the difference between the Masters of the Universe and us plebes: They have no financial or career risk at all. Only the little people have risk.

    “The Aristocrats!”

  30. 30.

    Rick Massimo

    November 15, 2011 at 12:19 pm

    But – but he’s a bold, entrepreneurial job-creating machine! He DESERVES billions of dollars for his boldness! Or something!

    “Romney always leverages his considerable assets—his business and managerial skills, his personal access and influence, his wealth …”

    Don’t forget his dad’s name. That’s where it all began. Of course.

  31. 31.

    patrick II

    November 15, 2011 at 12:22 pm

    I don’t blame Romney for this. Look at from the other side. Underlings are given tasks and then hung out to dry when things go wrong. Sometimes people are given “promotions” to tasks doomed to failure by a boss trying to do them damage. I had a friend given impossible software development task and then was asked to retire when the task didn’t make the timetable. My friend secretly wanted to retire from a company he thought was going down hill so he took it, it failed as expected, he took a golden parachute and left — a double double cross. They play hardball in the executive suites.

    I wonder what Bain’s motivation for telling that story to the reporter was? Dislike, admiration, vindictiveness? Is Bain for Cain?

  32. 32.

    Violet

    November 15, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    Anyone who finds this story surprising must never have worked in a private-sector enterprise with more than ten employees. Risk aversion is as natural as breathing.

    I completely agree. There is nothing unusual in what Mitt did as far as negotiating about his job and avoiding risk for his career. It’s smart to do something like that because corporations won’t stand up for you if the new job doesn’t work out, which might be through no fault of your own, but due to something like the company deciding they don’t want to support it as much as they thought, etc. You can be left out to dry and your reputation in your industry will take a hit. I really can’t fault Mitt for any of the first part of the story, since he’s just protecting his own interests and is smart enough to know the company won’t protect them for him unless he makes them.

  33. 33.

    JGabriel

    November 15, 2011 at 12:28 pm

    Zifnab:

    Was that even Bush’s call? Or did half a dozen generals lead by Colin Powell drag GW Jr into a private room and explain to him what happens to Presidents that piss off the US military too much?

    The story as I heard it (don’t remember the link, sorry) was that it was a cabinet meeting — or maybe the Iraq War Group or some other staff meeting (heh, he said staff) — late in Bush’s second term, when Dick (heh, he said … oh, forget it) started in on his usual “We MUST Bomb Iran” schtick.

    George, who was apparently sick of Dick’s shit turned to the rest of the meeting and asked, “Who here agrees with Dick? (pause) Raise your hands? (pause)(still pausing) No one else agrees with you, Dick. Next on the agenda.”

    One can argue that the world would be a much better place if Bush had his “Fuck Cheney” moment in 2000. But credit where credit is due.

    .

  34. 34.

    Mike G

    November 15, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    “So,” Bain says, “there was no professional or financial risk.”

    Doesn’t everyone working for corporations get sweetheart deals like this? (/snark)

    Another spolit rich brat Repuke, propelled through life by his daddy’s money and connections. Didn’t we just see this movie?

  35. 35.

    John Weiss

    November 15, 2011 at 1:40 pm

    Mittens?! Aw, come on. The guy tied his dog to the roof of his car! And he is no LBJ by a long shot!

  36. 36.

    Ruckus

    November 15, 2011 at 3:27 pm

    @Willard:
    You know what, Romney is too valuable as to candidate to risk losing him to the presidency.

    We might actually be able to convince mittens of this.

  37. 37.

    mclaren

    November 15, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    To me, this vignette perfectly gets to the core of Mitt Romney (not to mention the whole rigged game of American wealth and finance). Romney always leverages his considerable assets—his business and managerial skills, his personal access and influence, his wealth—to manipulate circumstances to avoid personal risk.

    Yes, but what you fail to realize is this is true for all mega-billionaires. The way people become immensely rich, studies show, is by avoiding all risk.

    Future billionaires like Ted Turner and Bill Gates always crafted their deals in such a way that they never put any money themselves. There’s a myth that successful entrepeneurs get rich because they bet big on huge business gambles which then pay off. Just the opposite turns out to be true!

    The billionaires get rich because they carefully set up deals in which they use other people’s money to pay for the investments. If the deal falls through, the other people are the ones who lose, not the successful entrepeneur. And if the investment pays off, the future billionaire is the one who captures the lion’s share of the profits.

    In a recent study “From Predators to Icons,” the French scholars Michel Villette and Chatherine Vuillermot set out to uncover what successful entrepreneurs have in common. They present case histories of businessmen who built their own empires—ranging from Sam Walton of Wal-Mart, to Bernard Arnault, of the luxury-goods conglomerate L.V.M.H.—and chart what they consider the typical course of a successful entrepreneur’s career. The truly successful businessman, in Villette and Vuillermot’s telling, is anything but a risk-taker. He is a predator, and predators seek to incur the least risk possible while hunting. Would we so revere risk-taking if we realized that the people who are supposedly taking bold risks in the cause of entrepreneurship are actually doing no such thing?
    Source: “The sure thing: how entrepeneurs really succeed,” by Malcolm Gladwell, The New Yorker, 18 January 2010.

    The delusion that hard work or brilliance makes entrepeneurs successful is a fantasy that has been comprehensively debunked. Entrepeneurs like Mitt Romney become successful precisely by always being careful to take no risks whatever. They always use someone else’s money for their deals, they always craft their business parternships in such a way that their partner take the losses like they get most of the gains.

    Thus we would expect exactly the same behavior from Mitt Romney as a politician: he sets up legislation so that other people (usually the bottom 99% of the population) take the risks and lose big if the policy fails, while Mitt gets the credit for proposing the policy and then he moves on before everyone realizes that the policy Romney proposed is actually a disaster.

    The collapsing medical system in Massachusetts offers a perfect example. Health care costs are exploding out of control in Massachusetts, and the state is in panic mode.

    http://hoganknows.com/2011/06/15/big-surprise-massachusetts-healthcare-costs-outpace-the-nation/

    Now they’re jabbering about “price controls” and “premium freezes” in Massachusetts. Yeah, that’ll work well. About as well as Nixon’s wage-price freeze back in ’71.
    Romneycare brings high healthcare costs and calls for price controls.

    Calls for a premium freeze in Massachusetts.

    Amazing that this isn’t a bigger nationwide story. This is where Obama’s ACA non-reform is headed: total systemic collapse of America’s broken medical-industrial complex as people get forced to buy unaffordable private insurance that’s guaranteed to rise in price without limit. It’ll end only one way — with America’s health care delivery system falling apart as the system enters a death spiral where the continuous cost increases in medical care force more and more people out of the insurance pool because they can’t pay the government-mandated premiums, which in turn raises costs for the remaining victims…excuse me, insurance premium-payers.

    Notice that Romney still gets kudos and vast amounts of credit from the media and the beltway elites for his “Romneycare” in MA even though it’s turned into a giant clusterfuck. As always, like a classic predator, Romney sets up the deal (in this case, Romneycare) so that he gets all the benefit (praise as a daring governor with a bold vision for reforming healthcare!) while other people take all the losses (infinitely increasing insurance premiums, exploding health care costs, massive rationing of service, ever-decreasing access to health care in Massachusetts).

  38. 38.

    negative 1

    November 15, 2011 at 6:47 pm

    I hate to defend Mitt but I think that this anecdote was a professional hit job. More than once in my corporate tenure the way to get rid of people was via a ‘Childrens’ Crusade’ approach. Simply send them off to do an impossible or completely unsupported task in a misfit department, when it inevitably fails, cut the department. The worst that happens is that it succeeds, in which case it’s not really that bad. I don’t blame him for trying not to be a victim of this, likely he’d done it to others at some point.
    Remember that for all of the ‘tough talk’ from the repub class, corporations are generally giant p***ys who won’t fire anyone. The best they’ll do is giant layoffs to cover themselves against wrongful termination lawsuits.

  39. 39.

    joeshabadoo

    November 15, 2011 at 11:08 pm

    I’ve known this is how people get rich for quite some time.

    Donald Trump didn’t make money by putting his own money into his shitty buildings. Remember how he talked about how he personally never went bankrupt? The suckers and even his own company could go under but he would end up on top (thanks to starting with daddy’s money of course)

    When someone starts a new business I have no problem with the them not risking their own money. They are putting in the time, work (like Romney did there) and ideas. I do have a problem with them not even getting a hit in the reputation department. Once someone does something big once it often seems like no number of fuckups can bring them down to the trustworthyness of someone who is just starting out. Going below that requires something special.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Jay on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 18, 2024 @ 5:17am)
  • Jay on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 18, 2024 @ 5:15am)
  • laura on On The Road – ema – 2024 AKC Meet the Breeds (Apr 18, 2024 @ 5:14am)
  • sab on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 18, 2024 @ 5:11am)
  • sab on Late Night ‘Should Be Always’ Open Thread: Librarians, Doing Civilization’s Work (Apr 18, 2024 @ 5:02am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!