• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

You come for women, you’re gonna get your ass kicked.

Fight them, without becoming them!

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

You cannot shame the shameless.

I wonder if trump will be tried as an adult.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

I really should read my own blog.

Let’s show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Their boy Ron is an empty plastic cup that will never know pudding.

After dobbs, women are no longer free.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

It’s easier to kill a dangerous animal than a man who just happens to have different thoughts/values than one’s own.

Putin dreamed of ending NATO, and now it’s Finnish-ed.

Donald Trump, welcome to your everything, everywhere, all at once.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

If West Virginia and San Francisco had a love child.

The lights are all blinking red.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Gun Issues / Gun nuts / More Fair Weather Federalism

More Fair Weather Federalism

by John Cole|  November 17, 20116:06 pm| 58 Comments

This post is in: Gun nuts, Republican Stupidity, Assholes, Sociopaths

FacebookTweetEmail

Speaking of gun nuts:

This week, the House of Representatives took time out of its busy schedule of going home for vacation to remind us, once again, why it has the strong support of about as many people who believe Rick Perry should be the next president of the United States. It approved a bill requiring states with strict gun regulations to honor concealed weapon carry permits issued in states where the gun rules are slightly more lax than the restrictions on who can dispense ice cream cones from a truck.

“This bill is about freedom,” said Representative Chris Gibson, a Republican from upstate New York. In this Congress, it’s hard to find anything that isn’t. Cutting Social Security is about freedom. Killing funds for Planned Parenthood is about freedom. Once again, we are reminded that, as Janis Joplin used to sing, freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose.

Here’s an example of the way the House plan would work. California has very strict limits on who can get a permit to carry a concealed weapon, involving extensive background checks by local law enforcement. Utah, on the other hand, is really mellow about the whole thing. You don’t even have to live there to get a Utah permit. Just ask the 215,000 non-Utah folks who’ve gotten one. And, in Florida, “it is so easy that a staffer in one of our offices was able to complete the form in less than 30 minutes,” said Representative Alcee Hastings, a Florida Democrat.

Under this bill, California’s strict rules on gun permits are now expanded to include anybody who drives into the state waving a Florida or Utah permission slip.

The bill passed 272 to 154. It’s a law-enforcement nightmare for states that take gun regulation seriously. There’s no national database cops can check if they stop someone who’s carrying a gun with an out-of-state permit. Some state records aren’t available at all.

They hate Democracy unless the people vote the way they want. Sure, all you folks might have voted on sensible gun laws for your state, but Chris Gibson knows better.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Sick Man
Next Post: God Bless Barney »

Reader Interactions

58Comments

  1. 1.

    harlana

    November 17, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    sorry to go OT, but these shots over NY are incredible – wow, there is going to be some violence going down. i hope i’m wrong.

  2. 2.

    BGinCHI

    November 17, 2011 at 6:11 pm

    I ask, is our children shooting?

  3. 3.

    The Snarxist Formerly Known As Kryptik

    November 17, 2011 at 6:15 pm

    You know, States’ Rights.

  4. 4.

    gnomedad

    November 17, 2011 at 6:16 pm

    They hate Democracy unless the people vote the way they want.

    Democracy = getting their way
    Tyranny = not getting their way

  5. 5.

    Vince CA

    November 17, 2011 at 6:17 pm

    Is this attached to another bill? I can’t think of a scenario where the Senate or the President advance this. Or are we a unicameral democracy now?

  6. 6.

    cathyx

    November 17, 2011 at 6:17 pm

    The bill passed 272 to 154. It’s a law-enforcement nightmare for states that take gun regulation seriously. There’s no national database cops can check if they stop someone who’s carrying a gun with an out-of-state permit. Some state records aren’t available at all.

    If only someone would invent a machine that all the police need to do is enter necessary information into this national database that is stored in it and be able to see if a person has a permit to carry a gun or not. Ah, to dream.

  7. 7.

    pragmatism

    November 17, 2011 at 6:17 pm

    @The Snarxist Formerly Known As Kryptik: red states’ rights? the right states’ rights?

  8. 8.

    gnomedad

    November 17, 2011 at 6:18 pm

    @The Snarxist Formerly Known As Kryptik:

    You know, States’ Rights.

    State’s Rights = getting their way … ah, screw it.

  9. 9.

    scav

    November 17, 2011 at 6:25 pm

    Guns, not marriage or medical marijuana.
    Of course.
    Still, may be a precedent they’ll come to regret.

  10. 10.

    marcopolo

    November 17, 2011 at 6:26 pm

    @cathyx: Except you have to think the same mindset that led to the passage of this bill is absolutely opposed to the idea of some kind of centralized federal database where gun owners would need to be registered.

    amiright?

  11. 11.

    RobChicago

    November 17, 2011 at 6:29 pm

    I wish the Democrats would make a big show out of sending this bill, and other such useless legislation, to the CBO, asking it to score its impact on reducing the deficit and creating jobs. They could even keep a running tally on a big beautiful chart for all to see.

  12. 12.

    trollhattan

    November 17, 2011 at 6:29 pm

    Ugh. And believe me, California gun laws aren’t “tough” in the least. How they’re applied is quite local.

    BTW, here are some fresh Freedom Bombs(tm) for Iran!

    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bunker-buster-bomb-20111117,0,3582708.story?track=icymi

  13. 13.

    David Koch

    November 17, 2011 at 6:32 pm

    so much for their precious 10th Amendment

  14. 14.

    Joseph Nobles

    November 17, 2011 at 6:33 pm

    As Eric Idle said in an offhand remark in a brilliant article on who wrote Shakespeare’s plays:

    Bush was right: No Child Left Unarmed

  15. 15.

    KG

    November 17, 2011 at 6:33 pm

    They hate Democracy unless the people vote the way they want

    Reminds me of all the posts I see on facebook all the time from my very Republican friends/family, like [pic of Obama] “if you voted for this guy last time, you owe the rest of us an apology” and shit like that.

  16. 16.

    Lee

    November 17, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    What I would love about this bill if it actually becomes law (not sure it will) is that they use this law as an excuse to either (or both) create a national database for gun registration and/or they set a standardize lower limit on the process for a gun permit.

    Grab some popcorn and watch the heads explode.

  17. 17.

    Chris

    November 17, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    @KG:

    “You voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you weren’t a racist, now vote against him in 2012 to prove you’re not an idiot!”

    And we don’t even know who’s running against him in 2012, but never mind all that, just sort of assume their candidate’ll be better.

  18. 18.

    AA+ Bonds

    November 17, 2011 at 6:41 pm

    This is exactly the same as the liberalization of health insurance regulation that is pretty much the single thing Republicans propose to replace current health care reform:

    1) argue that “the states should decide”
    2) force all other states to treat the lunatic decisions of one or two ultra-conservative state governments as localized statutes
    3) institute a fuckshit hellhole where America used to be

  19. 19.

    somegayname

    November 17, 2011 at 6:41 pm

    This is just more ‘piss off the hippies’ legislation. Truckers and salesmen are the only people I can think of who might have need to travel armed and I didn’t think they are a large constituency. That said, gun violence has steadily decreased the last 17 years despite an increased number of states granting permits, so evidence suggests that streets are not going to run red if this passes. Given the net non-effect of this legislation, our team would be wise to make it the ‘Interstate freedom’ bill and include marijuana licenses, gay marriages, and anything else that makes Rs scream ‘states rights!’ as well.

  20. 20.

    Omnes Omnibus

    November 17, 2011 at 6:42 pm

    @KG: Yeah, I got their apology right fuckin’ here.

    /tough guy

  21. 21.

    The Bobs

    November 17, 2011 at 6:44 pm

    This bill is not intended to pass. The point of this exercise is to present a badly written bill that Obama will have to veto. Then it will be “Obama wants to take you guns away, look what he did to this great bill!” for the next year.

  22. 22.

    RossInDetroit

    November 17, 2011 at 6:46 pm

    At least the GOP has a goal: the bottom. And they’re making sure we’re all in a race to get there.

  23. 23.

    Rafer Janders

    November 17, 2011 at 6:46 pm

    @harlana:

    Well, thank god Bloomberg de-escalated the situation by clearing Zucotti Park a few days ago….

  24. 24.

    AA+ Bonds

    November 17, 2011 at 6:48 pm

    Look, states have rights, like the right of New York to force Utah to recognize gay marriage licenses, OH SHIIIIIII

  25. 25.

    xian

    November 17, 2011 at 6:52 pm

    @Chris: “If you voted for him to prove you’re not a racist, guess what? You’re a racist!”

  26. 26.

    The Snarxist Formerly Known As Kryptik

    November 17, 2011 at 6:53 pm

    @The Bobs:

    That and, you know, doing everything but focusing on the fucking economy. Because doing that might help Obama, and the House Republicans just can’t have that. That’d be unconscionable!

  27. 27.

    The Ancient Randonneur

    November 17, 2011 at 6:53 pm

    And in the state of Vermont NO permit is required to carry a concealed weapon. Vermont would be required to formulate a process to come into compliance with this law. In other words the law will place an additional burden on gun owners in the state of Vermont. Gun grabbing Republicans! Who knew?

  28. 28.

    AA+ Bonds

    November 17, 2011 at 6:54 pm

    @harlana:

    When you criminalize demonstration, the people who stick it out are those with far less to lose, so this should work out just great for everyone

  29. 29.

    KG

    November 17, 2011 at 6:54 pm

    @Chris: yeah, I’ve seen that one too…

    @Omnes Omnibus: I try really hard not to get into political fights on the book. between my many lawyer friends who lean solidly (if not hard) right and my Cuban relatives, reason and logic aren’t worth much.

  30. 30.

    Omnes Omnibus

    November 17, 2011 at 6:59 pm

    @KG: I do my best to avoid politics on it entirely. Some creeps in, but, luckily for me, most of my family and friends are left leaning.

  31. 31.

    Menzies

    November 17, 2011 at 7:01 pm

    @KG:

    Oh geez, you have the Cubans too?

    I managed to flip my grandmother to like Obama after over forty years of thinking every single Democrat was (that Bay of Pigs traitor) JFK in someone else’s suit. That’s about as far as I’ve been able to go for the cause, and she can’t even vote.

  32. 32.

    some guy

    November 17, 2011 at 7:07 pm

    this bill was authored by my Congresscritter, Cliff Stearns. He keeps a low profile, usually, except when carrying wtare for his major donors. Hence, if the NRA wants something passed, Cliff is their go-to guy. He is also a big bankster shill. stupid fucker.

  33. 33.

    elftx

    November 17, 2011 at 7:07 pm

    They did it in honor of Oscar Ramiro Ortega-Hernandez doncha know?

  34. 34.

    Chuck Butcher

    November 17, 2011 at 7:08 pm

    Well hell, a national CCW standard (or firearms in general) probably makes sense, but then you’d find, say – NY,NY losing its shit. Kind of the same thing as gay marriage in, say – GA.

    OR’s laws regarding firearms are statewide, no locality is allowed to veer off course. Opinions on this matter vary from Portland to E OR and within those.

    Consistency isn’t a widely distributed human characteristic.

    Here either…

  35. 35.

    Chris

    November 17, 2011 at 7:11 pm

    @KG:

    I try really hard not to get into political fights on the book.

    I try to avoid politics altogether with wingnut relatives. It’s also why I try not to be facebook friends, because if there was ever a catalyst for those kinds of fruitless arguments, that’s it…

    Oh, I’ve got some Cubans too, incidentally. But the most Cuban person in my immediate family’s my grandmother (half), who at eighty years old is still more liberal than most of the country. No probs there.

  36. 36.

    The Bearded Blogger

    November 17, 2011 at 7:12 pm

    It’s not real freedom unless you can force it down everybody else’s throat

  37. 37.

    reflectionephemeral

    November 17, 2011 at 7:13 pm

    Well, it’s long been known that Republicans don’t care one iota about federalism.

    I recall John Ashcroft giving an interview to the white supremacist Southern Partisan magazine in 2000, praising them for “setting the record straight” about the War of Treason in Defense of Slavery, then starting the case that came to be known as Raich v. Gonzales– insisting on the federal government’s right to imprison people who complied with state law on medical marijuana.

    In fairness to Ashcroft and the GOP, they don’t care about any policy issues, just rewarding their funders.

  38. 38.

    Chris

    November 17, 2011 at 7:23 pm

    @reflectionephemeral:

    Speaking of slavery – didn’t Northern states back in the day pass laws prohibiting Southern plantation owners from bringing their slaves with them when they visited? And didn’t the Southern states raise an outrage in Congress and try to get these laws overturned on the basis of… whatever? Can’t remember where I read it, but I think it’s one of the things I read here.

    IOW, this is nothing new. The original “states’ rights” folks were just as full of shit.

  39. 39.

    PurpleGirl

    November 17, 2011 at 7:29 pm

    @Chuck Butcher: NYS has one set of gun laws… NYC has a stricter set of gun laws. Back when I owned the rifle, even though I used it in Westchester Cty, I observed the City’s laws.

  40. 40.

    Nutella

    November 17, 2011 at 7:37 pm

    @The Bobs:

    If it does get as far as Obama’s desk I hope he gives a speech about states’ rights when he vetos it.

    Confederates have always been lying about states’ rights since at least the Fugitive Slave Act in 1850. Interestingly enough, Vermont tried to nullify it.

  41. 41.

    Roger Moore

    November 17, 2011 at 7:46 pm

    @AA+ Bonds:

    2) force all other states to treat the lunatic decisions of one or two ultra-conservative wholly owned by the insurance lobby state governments as localized statutes

    FTFY. It will go down exactly the same way that North Dakota succeeded in legalizing usury throughout the country. The insurance companies will go to some small state that needs jobs and promise to move their headquarters there if they pass really lax insurance regulations. The legislature won’t be able to pass up the economic development and will pass whatever the industry wants, leaving the whole country screwed. It doesn’t take crazy conservatives, just self interested state legislatures willing to lead a race to the bottom as the price of attracting big business to their state.

    ETA: And can we get a cleanup on that obnoxious Change.org petition that refuses to stay in the left side column and overlaps onto the posts?

  42. 42.

    dedc79

    November 17, 2011 at 8:01 pm

    The Republicans basically have a very complicated game of rock, paper, scissors going where rock, paper, scissor are replaced by things like federalism, gun rights, abortion, national security, and where the rules change in the middle of the game so that they never get their hands smacked.

  43. 43.

    Chris

    November 17, 2011 at 8:04 pm

    @dedc79:

    The Republicans basically have a very complicated game of rock, paper, scissors going where rock, paper, scissor are replaced by things like federalism, gun rights, abortion, national security, and where the rules change in the middle of the game so that they never get their hands smacked.

    That’s not rock paper scissor, that’s Calvinball…

  44. 44.

    Chuck Butcher

    November 17, 2011 at 8:09 pm

    @PurpleGirl:

    You know where you stand no matter where in OR. I am not going to accidently violate. If I travel with a firearm I do check on the states’ laws where I’ll be but trying to know every bumfuckegypt town’s laws is stupid.

    If any of you think it isn’t real easy to accidently violate, you don’t know spit about the variations and level of variations.

  45. 45.

    OC

    November 17, 2011 at 8:26 pm

    It’s all about the freedom to be shot by some unlicensed jackass gun owner. Sweet Jeebus….

  46. 46.

    Chuck Butcher

    November 17, 2011 at 8:54 pm

    @OC:
    Dumbass, a CCW is a license

  47. 47.

    nodakfarmboy

    November 17, 2011 at 9:00 pm

    @Roger Moore:

    It will go down exactly the same way that North Dakota succeeded in legalizing usury throughout the country.

    In our defense, it’s South Dakota that has lax usury laws and is home to multiple credit card corporations.

    In North Dakota, we specialize in sucking up to oil companies and passive aggressive behavior.

  48. 48.

    Chuck Butcher

    November 17, 2011 at 9:10 pm

    @nodakfarmboy:
    It is important to keep this sorted out.

  49. 49.

    Roger Moore

    November 17, 2011 at 9:23 pm

    @nodakfarmboy:
    Sorry, I tend to get all those states in flyover country mixed up ;-)

  50. 50.

    beergoggles

    November 17, 2011 at 9:32 pm

    I don’t particularly care about the portability but what irks me is the requirement for police to evaluate me as a ‘good citizen’ independent of clearly stated background checks and standards. It’s like the catholic church evaluating child safety. Establish some clear national standard for gun ownership and be done with it instead of leaving it to arbitrary police departments that are clearly racist in who they evaluate as an upstanding citizen.

  51. 51.

    Judge Crater

    November 17, 2011 at 9:59 pm

    Historians will someday (assuming the Republic lasts that long) try to decipher the events of the last 30 years and the GOP’s decent into madness. This will be just one data point in the historical record that marks our nation’s confusion of concepts like “freedom” and “the marketplace” with the realities of life in a liberal democracy.

    We can regress to the norms of the 19th century (the Republican utopia) or we can forge a future that imagines a truly rational society and government.

    Right now it seems like a toss-up.

  52. 52.

    Ian

    November 18, 2011 at 3:00 am

    @Roger Moore:
    Mine are target ads.

  53. 53.

    Chris

    November 18, 2011 at 3:01 am

    @gnomedad: Echoes the old Mel Brook line: “Tragedy is when I get a paper cut. Comedy is when you fall in a sewer grate and die.”

    Or, in other words: typical Republican sentiment: “I matter; you don’t.”

  54. 54.

    Commenting at Balloon Juice since 1937

    November 18, 2011 at 8:44 am

    I assume you can’t get busted for weed because in one of the states its cool to carry a certain amount on your person.

  55. 55.

    Bill

    November 18, 2011 at 10:18 am

    I’ll accept comity on concealed carry if it comes with a rider creating comity on gay marriage.

  56. 56.

    mikeyes

    November 18, 2011 at 10:48 am

    I’ll ask an impolitic question.

    Since gun ownership is now an enumerated right and 14th Amendment incorporation of this right applies as of 2010, what is the difference between this law and laws requiring all states to honor other rights?

    Article IV Constitutional law.
    Privileges and Immunities clause.
    “The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.”

    This applies to to unenmerated rights such as marriage, driver’s licences, contracts, etc. in my (unlettered) opinion, but to deny one enumerated right while demanding others is hypocritical. On both sides.

    Granted, CCW is not a right, but self defense is. It is, however, a privilege in 49 states so there is a legal basis for this law. In addition, the existing federal law for LEOs has never been controversial even though the likelihood of a LEO using a gun to commit a crime is much higher than a CCW carrier.

    In addition, states can ban CCW if they want and a CCW licencee from another state cannot carry in that state. The law says that all state laws and restrictions regarding CCW have to be followed.

    The two primary issues here are the disparity between the various regulations/laws regarding the acquisition of CCW in each state and the difference between “may issue” and “shall issue” states.

    In “may issue” states such as CA, the various state entities that make the decision basically discriminate against anyone they don’t like. This can be based on fear of guns, race, or whether or not that person contributed to the local sheriff’s campaign fund. “Shall issue” states require that the carrier not be a felon and fit the federal laws that allow for gun ownership. This law brings up the differences (and possible civil rights violations) more sharply.

    The issue regarding state regulations on training and safety is a more complicated and troubling issue. Common sense tells you that a CCW holder should be able to make sure that a weapon is both safe and used properly if needed. Some states have virtually no training requirements and many states have lowered the standards over the years. In fact, we have over 50 years experience with this issue and the experience has shown that law abiding citizens follow the law. There have been very few incidents of legal carry crimes in that period. Studies show that most CCW permit owners don’t even carry guns – it is a pain in the ass (literally) to do so and it carries significant liability. Still, people can certainly disagree based with this law on safety policy. But right now there are no statistics that show that such a law would increase the danger.

    Thirty-five states already have mutual compacts with no increase in crime or accidental shootings. Personally I think that the states should continue this pathway of mutual recognition but I also think that every state should honor the marriages of every citizen so I am not very consistent, am I?

  57. 57.

    Trakker

    November 18, 2011 at 11:08 am

    A guy goes into a gun shop to buy a .50 caliber Desert Eagle pistol. The dealer says to him, “Tommy, man, you already bought 24 handguns this year already and the state just passed a law that says if you buy more than 24 handguns a year they have to castrate you.”

    Tommy stops and thinks for a moment and says, “Damn! I’m really gonna’ miss my nuts, man.”

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Things You Might Find Interesting | DC Skeptics says:
    November 18, 2011 at 9:33 am

    […] Fair Weather Federalism: State authority is only good when used as way around federal laws I disagre… […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • LiminalOwl on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 18, 2024 @ 7:48am)
  • EarthWindFire on Late Night ‘Should Be Always’ Open Thread: Librarians, Doing Civilization’s Work (Apr 18, 2024 @ 7:45am)
  • Suzanne on Thursday Morning Open Thread — Nancy Pelosi: Every Day Is A Matter of Life and Death (Apr 18, 2024 @ 7:33am)
  • Eyeroller on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 18, 2024 @ 7:31am)
  • Mousebumples on Thursday Morning Open Thread — Nancy Pelosi: Every Day Is A Matter of Life and Death (Apr 18, 2024 @ 7:29am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!