• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Rupert, come get your orange boy, you petrified old dinosaur turd.

“But what about the lurkers?”

đŸŽ¶ Those boots were made for mockin’ đŸŽ”

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. keep building.

White supremacy is terrorism.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

With all due respect and assumptions of good faith, please fuck off into the sun.

Oppose, oppose, oppose. do not congratulate. this is not business as usual.

The words do not have to be perfect.

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

Welcome to day five of every-bit-as-bad-as-you-thought-it-would-be.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

“When somebody takes the time to draw up a playbook, they’re gonna use it.”

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

The real work of an opposition party is to oppose.

He really is that stupid.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Return of the mack

Return of the mack

by DougJ|  December 4, 20113:02 pm| 78 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

Steve M. flags a quote that also caught my eye:

Gingrich “only has two modes — attack and brag,” explained one veteran GOP strategist.

For my money, no one else has nailed the feel of this Republican primary the way Steve M. has. He asked of Donald Trump “are we really sure that couldn’t work — winning the nomination, by being the macher, the mack, the big pimp?” Yes, Trump flamed out but he was never in it to win it, and his Big Poppa routine played a lot better than I ever thought it would, however briefly. And the gangster rap comparison was perfect:

Huntsman is like a rapper who isn’t gangsta, doesn’t want to be gangsta, and knows that some of the people making their name on gangsta don’t want you to know that they have problems with “authenticity.” The problem is, Huntsman is like M.C. Hammer — a family-friendly rapper with mass-market dance moves and baggy pants — and he’s certain that, sooner or later, people are going to get tired of all the songs about gangbanging, and what they’ll want instead is … him and his G-rated rhymes and his dance moves and clown pants. Because that was popular before gangsta.

Yes, “attack and brag” is 100% perfect for this Republican primary. And no apologizies. Gingrich’s three marriages don’t hurt him much with the Republican base because it’s a slap in the face to all the mythical left-wing prudes the same way that dressing as Jack-and-Marlboro for Halloween is. All those millions he’s made quasi-illegally? Just shows he’s a bad-ass money-maker, the kind that libruls love to hate.

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with enjoying music or movies or books that celebrate tough guy attack-and-brag personae. I don’t there’s even anything so awful about liking celebrities who seem to embrace that persona.

Some kind of line has been crossed when a large portion of the Republican party wants that in the leader of the free world. We saw the beginnings of this with all the “bring ’em on” faux cowboy bullshit we saw from George W. Bush, but that was in the context of a war, not a presidential debate and it had an “I’ll keep you safe” edge to it. This primary isn’t about keeping anyone safe, it’s about some strange wing-nut form of dick-measurement.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Look who showed up
Next Post: These are the good old days »

Reader Interactions

78Comments

  1. 1.

    schrodinger's cat

    December 4, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    So do you think Newt will be the nominee?

  2. 2.

    BruceFromOhio

    December 4, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    This primary isn’t about keeping anyone safe, it’s about some strange wing-nut form of dick-measurement.

    Then three strikes for Newt, because he clearly couldn’t figure out that simple reckoning.

    If the clown car swerves and hits the right bumps in the center ring, and somehow manages to barf out this soulless ratfuck lowlife scumbag of a grifter as the GOP candidate, I can’t wait for that sour look on his puss when the President serves him a full plate of hot, steaming crow in the debates.

  3. 3.

    Yutsano

    December 4, 2011 at 3:15 pm

    Newt has a temper. One of Bill Clinton’s best talents was being able to exploit Newt’s temper. He’ll blow up at an inopportune time and the video will go viral. I’ll make popcorn.

    @schrodinger’s cat: Who’s left? The two Mormons and the guy who’s name is also a sexual term?

  4. 4.

    Villago Delenda Est

    December 4, 2011 at 3:16 pm

    Newt is just another Mammon worshiping asshole, so of course the 27%, who are all Mammon worshiping assholes, love him, and also, he doesn’t wear funny underwear like the other major Mammon worshiping asshole still in contention.

  5. 5.

    Calming Influence

    December 4, 2011 at 3:16 pm

    “strange wing-nut form of dick-measurement” needs to be a tag.

  6. 6.

    MattF

    December 4, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    I know there’s bad feeling about Mo Dowd– and with some justification; she’s smart enough to do better, but can’t drop the schtick. That said, Dowd on Noot:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/opinion/sunday/dowd-out-of-africa-and-into-iowa.html?ref=opinion

  7. 7.

    schrodinger's cat

    December 4, 2011 at 3:23 pm

    Is his real name Newt? as in a lizard?

  8. 8.

    Boudica

    December 4, 2011 at 3:25 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat: Newton Leroy Gingrich….

  9. 9.

    MattF

    December 4, 2011 at 3:26 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat: Newton Leroy. Yes, really.

  10. 10.

    Boudica

    December 4, 2011 at 3:26 pm

    as in fig…..

  11. 11.

    schrodinger's cat

    December 4, 2011 at 3:26 pm

    @Yutsano: I don’t get this antipathy to the Mormons. Other possibilities:
    May be a brokered convention?
    Sarah/Jeb Bush to the rescue
    Tunch gets the nomination

  12. 12.

    schrodinger's cat

    December 4, 2011 at 3:28 pm

    @Boudica: Seems like he has had one too many! Seriously Leroy? That is even worse than Newt. Poor Newt, why did his parents hate him so?

  13. 13.

    Villago Delenda Est

    December 4, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    Look how he turned out. Of course they hated him.

  14. 14.

    ant

    December 4, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVOrUjxsVIU

    thread need soundtrack.

  15. 15.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 3:35 pm

    I think we’re gonna need a bigger boat.

  16. 16.

    Mike in NC

    December 4, 2011 at 3:39 pm

    Gingrich’s three marriages don’t hurt him much with the Republican base because it’s a slap in the face to all the mythical left-wing prudes the same way that dressing as Jack-and-Marlboro for Halloween is.

    If Newt is the nominee — and that’s still highly unlikely — his three marriages, serial adultery, boundless greed, hypocrisy, and conversion to Catholicism will be huge liabilities to the base, not to mention to so-called independents and swing voters.

    The GOP is the “party of personal responsibility”, where the self-described Values Voters and evangelicals hang out. Newt’s baggage with baggage isn’t going to be an easy sell to that crowd, no matter how hard the little bastard begs forgiveness.

  17. 17.

    Yutsano

    December 4, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat: It won’t be Jeb. The stink of Dubya is too strong.

    Too much work for Snowbilly Snookie unless she gets it handed to her at a brokered convention.

    His Tunchness would break the country for his payments demands in tuna. Plus he already rules us. We just have puppet governments.

  18. 18.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 3:41 pm

    @Mike in NC: If Cain is his running mate, that could lead to a Georgia Express Hot Tub Rolling Supply Side Thunder Tour.

    The bus would also have card swipers on the side so you could donate while it was still moving.

  19. 19.

    schrodinger's cat

    December 4, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    @Yutsano: Tunch will rule with an iron paw. Plus he 3/4 white and the orange tail adds the requisite diversity.

  20. 20.

    MikeJ

    December 4, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    Yes, MC Hammer was a G rated rapper.

    So was Will Smith.

  21. 21.

    Brachiator

    December 4, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    Great title, although I still like one that I mentioned in another thread that Newt is Bringing Nasty Back.

    It’s interesting to see how eager some conservative pundits are to see Newt take on Obama in a presidential debate. They keep noting how sharp Newt can be when he goes on the attack. And they keep mooning over how Newt comes up with lots of ideas. Of course that they are bad ideas doesn’t seem to matter to them.

    Of course, lurking in the background is the belief that Mitt is too weak and vacillating to take Obama on, and the feverish dream that Newt has what it takes (he was professor, too, concha know) to deal with an uppity Obama.

    If by some weird disruption in the Force, Newt ends up being the nominee, I will bet good money that he will end up looking like a total fool when he tries to present himself, as he inevitably would, as a proud Southerner using a firm hand to put an uppity black in his place.

  22. 22.

    EconWatcher

    December 4, 2011 at 3:45 pm

    The odds are certainly against Gingrich getting the White House (though not so much now against him getting the nomination, it seems to me, especially with Mitt seemingly losing his cool).

    But really, this is no joke. Gingrich is emotionally unstable, arrogant to the point of megalomania, and prone to bizarre theories and gestures. If he won, our journey to the status of banana republic would drastically accelerate. We’d remember with nostalgia the comparatively steady hand and good judgment of George W. Bush. Really.

  23. 23.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 3:47 pm

    @Brachiator: Just to be clear, Newt was a prof until his colleagues called bullshit, denied him tenure, and he was fired.

    Resentment anyone?

  24. 24.

    EconWatcher

    December 4, 2011 at 3:48 pm

    @BGinCHI:

    I did not know this. Where? When?

  25. 25.

    schrodinger's cat

    December 4, 2011 at 3:50 pm

    @BGinCHI: So is he taking his revenge on the rest of us, for his atrocious name and being denied tenure?

  26. 26.

    DougJ

    December 4, 2011 at 3:51 pm

    @MikeJ:

    Will Smith is a unique talent.

  27. 27.

    Lysana

    December 4, 2011 at 3:53 pm

    @MikeJ: And Hammer managed to come back from being overly generous to his presumed friends and is now a venture capitalist.

    What gets me is even with the GOP field as it stands, a friend of mine insists Obama won’t win. She’s with Occupy Portland, so I encouraged her rather strongly to think about what she was telling me about possible movement on DC and the anti-Democratic attitude in some sections of Occupy as a risk to proving that prediction true. I can’t be sure if I got anywhere, as she’s way too good at sticking to her own conversation and my input be damned.

    But really, I think on top of the GOP field prone to generate people like Gingrich as potential front-runners, Occupy’s at risk of being a wild card. And it might open the door for anyone. Even the Wasilla grifter. Point being? Too far out to say anything will happen. I think Obama can win. I also see where some things may make the intolerable happen.

    And yes, she told me flat-out there is talk of shifting Occupiers from their cities to stage larger events in DC. This had her fretting over military juntas in charge. I pointed out the GOP winning would be the surest way for it to happen, so why can’t Occupy get over attacking the Dems and realize they’re the only party that can do anything right for this country? She declined to engage that point.

  28. 28.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 3:55 pm

    @EconWatcher: From the wiki:

    “In 1970, Gingrich joined the history department at West Georgia College as an assistant professor. In 1974 he moved to the geography department and was instrumental in establishing an inter-disciplinary environmental studies program. Denied tenure, he left the college in 1978.”

    Nothing against WGC, but you know how easy it was to get tenure in the 1970s? Unless you were at a top 10 research 1 university, getting tenure then was not difficult. The academic job market only really got competitive (or hyper-competitive, really) in the 1980s.

    He was either hated, terrible at his job, or failed to publish anything, or some combination of these things. I’m sure the fuller story is out there somewhere.

  29. 29.

    FlipYrWhig

    December 4, 2011 at 3:57 pm

    @EconWatcher: Here’s the Wikipedia entry for Gingrich. Scroll down to “Early Life.”

  30. 30.

    RossInDetroit

    December 4, 2011 at 3:57 pm

    @EconWatcher:

    Gingrich is emotionally unstable, arrogant to the point of megalomania, and prone to bizarre theories and gestures.

    It’s gonna be a blast seeing him square off against The Donald in a debate. Clash of the Titanic Egos.

    Popcorn!!!

  31. 31.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 3:57 pm

    @DougJ: I always thought he was a front for DJ Jazzy Jeff. No?

  32. 32.

    FlipYrWhig

    December 4, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    @BGinCHI: Here’s some of the fuller story from A Newt Chronology via PBS/Frontline.

  33. 33.

    catclub

    December 4, 2011 at 4:02 pm

    @EconWatcher: “Gingrich is emotionally unstable, arrogant to the point of megalomania, and prone to bizarre theories and gestures.”

    You know who else was emotionally unstable and a megalomaniac?

  34. 34.

    Benjamin Franklin

    December 4, 2011 at 4:04 pm

    http://www.politico.com/playbook/1211/playbook1623.html

    –A TOP CAIN ADVISER tells us the former candidate plans to endorse in the next few weeks – certainly this month, in order to affect the Iowa caucuses – and is most likely to go GINGRICH.

    And with that goes Cain’s 2%, his campaign cash, and the support of all discarded Stepford Wives.

  35. 35.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 4:04 pm

    @FlipYrWhig: I would have watched that, but I swore off amphibian life-cycle programs over the summer. I was just getting too addicted.

  36. 36.

    sharl

    December 4, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    OT (though not entirely so)-

    In case Dennis G. is reading: Dennis, I just heard your ol’ pal Jack Abramoff being interviewed on Bob Edwards Weekend. [Unfortunately the show is no longer available via podcast, though perhaps Sirius XM or local stations will rebroadcast it.]

    You’re the expert on this guy, not me. He didn’t do any blatant lying that I could tell, and he came off as generally subdued, humble, and regretful. Bob Edwards was a good choice for him, given the laid back and nonthreatening nature of Edwards’ interviewing style. There are a few media types out there who would have brought up the worst of his past – the Northern Marianas Islands business comes to mind – but Edwards basically let him do most of the talking.

    I didn’t hear any allusion to his future plans, other than hawking his book, of course [Capitol Punishment: The Hard Truth About Washington Corruption From America’s Most Notorious Lobbyist].

  37. 37.

    WereBear (itouch)

    December 4, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    Gingrich is emotionally unstable, arrogant to the point of megalomania, and prone to bizarre theories and gestures.

    and this works against him as the Repub nominee how?

  38. 38.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 4:08 pm

    @FlipYrWhig: Oh, this is just too good:

    1977 Newt needs money. Has no chance of getting tenure, has unpaid debts from two previous campaigns and faces at least a half-year of no income in ’78 if he runs again. Realtor and former Southwire sales manager Chester Roush lines up a dozen wealthy financial backers to pay Newt to write a Cold War novel. They contribute $13,000. Newt takes the family to Europe for “research” and writes, but does not finish, a manuscript. He says Alvin Toffler told him at the time, “You’re obviously better at shaking hands than writing fiction.”

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/newt/newtchron.html

  39. 39.

    Benjamin Franklin

    December 4, 2011 at 4:11 pm

    “You’re obviously better at shaking hands than writing fiction.”

    Hoo Boy ! Is HE wrong……

  40. 40.

    Brachiator

    December 4, 2011 at 4:12 pm

    @catclub

    You know who else was emotionally unstable and a megalomaniac?

    Yeah, Newt does remind me a lot of Richard Nixon, but with even fewer redeeming qualities.

  41. 41.

    Xecky Gilchrist

    December 4, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    that was in the context of a war, not a presidential debate and it had an “I’ll keep you safe” edge to it.

    Maybe that was there for people who wanted to hear it – and maybe the speechwriters intended it – but IMO, Dubya delivered it as pure dick.

  42. 42.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    @Brachiator: Why do I always think the answer to this is Courtney Love?

  43. 43.

    Cat Lady

    December 4, 2011 at 4:15 pm

    The general consensus among the not crazy that the GOP candidates are all pathetic clowns has even started to seep into the 27%ers bubble, and there’s nothing worse for teatards than to realize that they’re being pointed to and laughed at. That’s what’s animating their newfound Newt love – he’s considered to be smart. That he’s a stupid person’s idea of a smart person doesn’t matter to them. They just hear others outside of their bubble put “Newt” and “smart” in the same sentence, and that’s the lifesaver they’re going to grab onto. Plus, Newt’s got a wicked mean streak, and that’s just gravy.

  44. 44.

    Amir Khalid

    December 4, 2011 at 4:19 pm

    The coronation of Newton le Roi Gingrich, as Republican nominee let alone as (shudder) President, is far from a done deal. He’s like the rest of the field in that he can’t withstand real scrutiny either. I’m pretty confident he’ll come to some kind of pathetic collapse, brought on on by his lack of money and campaign organization. He’s already done it, six months ago, and I know he’s got another one in him.

  45. 45.

    Benjamin Franklin

    December 4, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    campaign organization.

    There’s the rub. He will acquire vast sums ala Citizens United, but his piss-poor people skills are emblematic of the New Whigs.

    “Property 1st, people, 2nd”

  46. 46.

    EconWatcher

    December 4, 2011 at 4:24 pm

    @Amir Khalid:

    Hope you’re right. Time is kinda running out, though.

    One thing that gives me some comfort is this: Chances are, Gingrich is having an affair right now. [And by right now, I don’t mean in 2011. I mean right now, as I type this.]

    He’s just become the front runner, so recent transgressions may not yet have had a chance to bubble to the surface. Let’s hope they’re there, and will soon appear.

  47. 47.

    RossInDetroit

    December 4, 2011 at 4:24 pm

    @Amir Khalid:

    Right. And the only thing that’s kept Newt in the race so far is lack of attention. If he attains his desired place as front runner the scrutiny, questions and digging up the past will make him nuts. He wants to be the New Newt, not the Clinton attacking, wife leaving Old Newt. But the media will dig all of that up and it will irritate the hell out of him.

  48. 48.

    Tyro

    December 4, 2011 at 4:30 pm

    Nothing against WGC, but you know how easy it was to get tenure in the 1970s?

    My understanding is that Newt didn’t publish anything while he was a professor. He liked to schmooze more than he liked to produce research.

  49. 49.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 4:31 pm

    @EconWatcher: Newt’s weekly diary for this past week.

    Wed: Shopping and Thank You card for Herman Cain.

    Thurs: Book signings, witty apothegms, banter over large meal.

    Fri: Mani/pedi.

    Sat: Debate. Note: be less Dickish. They like us now.

    Sun: Do the nasty with mistress.

  50. 50.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    @Tyro: Yep, sounds like he was running for office the second he got his pencils put in the tray. Hard to get work done when you’re gladhanding 12/5 (weekends and evenings for binge eating and chasing tail).

  51. 51.

    Napoleon

    December 4, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    @sharl:

    Jack A. was an interesting interview on that show. The only place it looked to me where he shaded was when he was asked about how he dissed clients and he denied it without explaining the text of the e-mails (though he mentioned the e-mails) regarding Indian tribes. The only way he could square that circle is by saying that yes he said the stuff, yes it was disrespectful but he was sucking up to the guy he was writing to who he knew to be a racist.

    The other part where I think he would go factually off the rail is basically stuff involving his political philosophy. He basically said lobbing was corrupt but somehow, in part, his solution is to let states take care of issues because if the feds are out of them there is no reason to lobbying them. Pure rightwing BS that ignores the fact that the problem will migrate to the states where you have even less oversight.

  52. 52.

    Donald G

    December 4, 2011 at 4:55 pm

    With apologies to Jello Biafra and the Dead Kennedys, a little song for the Gingrich campaign:

    I am Speaker Newt Gingrich.
    I just love the filthy rich.
    Soon I will be pre-zi-dent.

    Hopenchange will fade away.
    I will be fuhrer someday.
    Your kids’ll scrub toilets for the Master race
    As you worship my doughy face.

    Speaker Newt uber Alles.
    Speaker Newt uber Alles.
    Speaker Newt uber Alles
    Uber Alles Speaker New-ew-ew-ewt.

    Newt, call me, baby. (does phone gesture with thumb and pinky finger) I can do for you what Mark Block did for Herman Cain.

  53. 53.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    @Donald G: You should sue him if at the holidays he goes on a Holiday in Cambodia.

  54. 54.

    Donald G

    December 4, 2011 at 5:00 pm

    @BGinCHI:

    I’m more worried about Biafra suing me for the parody, actually.

  55. 55.

    kd bart

    December 4, 2011 at 5:06 pm

    I’m waiting for Newt to end a debate by saying “Say goodnight to the bad guy.” ala Tony Montana

  56. 56.

    vtr

    December 4, 2011 at 5:14 pm

    Calista = Johnny Winter in 1968 w/o the guitar skills.

    Separately, everyone talks about the seemingly weak GOP field and how Obama could be vulnerable, but, given that, have you read any perceptive discussion about why no one else is running? It strikes me as strange.

  57. 57.

    Donald G

    December 4, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    A little more for the road:

    Now it is two-zero-one-four…
    Knock,knock at your front door…
    It’s the cross-bearin’ secret police.
    They’ve come for your Mexican neice.

    March quietly to the camp.
    Santorum and Bachmann are hooked to an amp.
    You start to worry as you look to the tower…
    For you’ll soon come to feel Newt’s power.

    [REPEAT CHORUS]

  58. 58.

    Jenny

    December 4, 2011 at 5:23 pm

    no one else has nailed the feel of this Republican primary the way Steve M.

    I’m suspicious of steve’s judgement because he got it so wrong in 2008. He was constantly emoing, saying McCain was a sure winner.

  59. 59.

    RossInDetroit

    December 4, 2011 at 5:44 pm

    @Jenny:

    I can sorta forgive anyone who thought America would elect a GOP War Hero(tm) over a black man. A lot of people I know were very pessimistic.

  60. 60.

    CarolDuhart2

    December 4, 2011 at 5:44 pm

    @BGinCHI: And West Georgia College doesn’t sound like it would be a place where the people above you were Rhodes Scholars and world beaters. Getting tenure at a place like that back then probably was as long as you published something decent once and got along with everybody. Newt apparently couldn’t even manage tenure at a 3rd rate college.

  61. 61.

    FlipYrWhig

    December 4, 2011 at 5:52 pm

    @CarolDuhart2: From the Frontline timeline I linked above, it doesn’t sound like he even _tried_ to do the work that would result in getting tenure. Becoming a politico was the objective all along.

  62. 62.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 5:55 pm

    @FlipYrWhig: Why don’t the conservatives notice that Newt has never worked in the Private Sector? Isn’t that their litmus test for Managerial Competence or whatever the hell they think makes someone good at something?

    He’s been in school or pretending to be a professor or a politician or a fake novelist.

    Jobs created?

    0

  63. 63.

    Tony J

    December 4, 2011 at 6:02 pm

    @vtr:

    Separately, everyone talks about the seemingly weak GOP field and how Obama could be vulnerable, but, given that, have you read any perceptive discussion about why no one else is running? It strikes me as strange.

    Offhand I can’t recall anyone doing an in depth study on why none of the ‘serious’ GOP Stars showed any interest in running next year, but the prevailing wisdom seems to be that the ones who might see it as ‘their time’ either –

    a) Don’t think Obama is anywhere near as vulnerable as the horserace-obsessed pundits would like people to believe, and don’t want to soil their brand with defeat.

    b) Don’t think they could successfully pivot from a Primary campaign to running in the General because of the 110% Proof Crazy they’d have to wallow in to get the nomination. Again, protecting their own personal brand from too close an association with what the Republican Party Base has become over the last generation.

    c) Are smart enough to know that the U.S. works best – for them – in a cycle of Republican Looting/Democratic Restocking of the National Shelves/Republican Looting, and there simply hasn’t been a long enough period of Democratic control for the prize to be worth the effort yet.

    d), a combination of a, b and c.

  64. 64.

    CarolDuhart2

    December 4, 2011 at 6:04 pm

    @vtr: Good point. For all of the bravado, why have the better Republicans decide to sit this one out? I’ve run across that $1 billion haul Obama is supposed to raise this time around. I imagine that a lot of them figured that having to first raise a ton to beat Romney in the primary, then turn around and face a well-funded and well rested Obama was something they would rather not do this time, especially when 2016 was likely an open year like 2008. Then they would face an elderly Biden or a newcomer on the national scene who would also have to go therough a competitive primary.

    And it’s not just the money. Obama has a second-to-none canvassing and organizing organization that was set up everywhere and can flood the zone with volunteers and organizers. It’s the largest ever, and they doubt that the evangelical 72 hour crowd could match it. Indeed, the 72 hour crowd was flummoxed because OFA was canvassing for weeks in advance getting out the early vote.

    They figure that those things will be off the table in 2016, and the economy improved.

  65. 65.

    SiubhanDuinne

    December 4, 2011 at 6:05 pm

    @BGinCHI:

    If Cain is [Newt’s] running mate, that could lead to a Georgia Express Hot Tub Rolling Supply Side Thunder Tour.

    What a beautiful thought. Too bad there’s a law* against having the Prez/VP running mates from the same state. That’s why Dick “Dick” Cheney moved back to Wyoming in 2000 after having spent years and years in Texas.

    *I’m not sure whether that’s in the Constitution or was a law passed by Congress at some point, or is simply so embedded in tradition that it essentially has the force of law. Someone here will know, and if nobody speaks up I will wander off and ask my friend Mr. Google.

  66. 66.

    suzanne

    December 4, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    I don’t get this antipathy to the Mormons.

    I understand it. Depending on how one interprets things, they’re technically polytheists, and yet they insist that they’re Christian. This pisses off the Evangelicals, because they believe that they’re the ones who decide who’s Christian and who isn’t.

    To be honest, that’s one issue where I think the Evangelicals are right. Sarah Palin pissed me off when she said she was a feminist. It matters what words mean.

  67. 67.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 6:10 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: Wow. Had no idea.

    We’ll be the poorer for the loss of entertainment.

  68. 68.

    Yutsano

    December 4, 2011 at 6:19 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: It’s a Constitutional requirement. It made more sense when there were 13 states and the point was to diffuse executive power so no one state would dominate.

  69. 69.

    SiubhanDuinne

    December 4, 2011 at 6:27 pm

    @BGinCHI:

    It goes way back, according to Wiki:

    The creation of the office of Vice President was a direct consequence of the Electoral College. Delegates to the Philadelphia Convention gave each state a number of presidential electors equal to that state’s combined share of House and Senate seats. Yet the delegates were worried that each elector would only favor his own state’s favorite son candidate, resulting in deadlocked elections that would produce no winners. To counter this presumed difficulty, the delegates gave each presidential elector two votes, required at least one of those votes be for a candidate from outside the elector’s state, and mandated that the winner of the election obtain an absolute majority with respect to the total number of electors. With these rules in place, the delegates hoped each electors’ second vote would go to a statesman of national character.

  70. 70.

    SiubhanDuinne

    December 4, 2011 at 6:30 pm

    @Yutsano:

    That’s kind of what I recalled, in the dim recesses of the cloaca I call my mind, and Wikipedia has confirmed it. Thanks, Yutsy.

  71. 71.

    DS

    December 4, 2011 at 6:34 pm

    When I first read this headline I thought it was about Connie Mack, the Republican douchebag running for Senate in Florida. I was over at RedState getting my daily chuckles a while ago and he is incorporating a baseball into his campaign logo-thing. He is the great-grandson of Connie Mack. Great-grandson. First, could this possible sway any of the senile old fucks in Florida to vote for him, and second, isn’t there a statute of limitations on this shit? I know we love our famous dynasties but really?

  72. 72.

    BGinCHI

    December 4, 2011 at 6:35 pm

    @DS: Thanks a lot. Now I’m hungry for Chili Mac.

  73. 73.

    Dom Phenom

    December 4, 2011 at 8:03 pm

    Ha. That must mean that Romney wins the Vanilla Ice position in the Republican field.

  74. 74.

    priscianusjr

    December 4, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    @MattF:

    she’s smart enough to do better, but can’t drop the schtick

    I think that’s about the fairest description I’ve seen of the MoDo. Every so often (i.e. very rarely) she allows herself to write a decent column — or maybe it just slips out. Haven’t read this one yet, but will do so immediately, thanks for the link.

  75. 75.

    Calouste

    December 5, 2011 at 1:38 am

    @vtr:

    Yes. One thing that stands out is that there is no sitting GOP Senator running. That is for the first time in a very, very long time. Even in 1992, when everyone thought Bush I was a lock for reelection, there were 2 Senators running in the Dem primaries.

  76. 76.

    Paul in KY

    December 5, 2011 at 9:59 am

    @Brachiator: Newt isn’t fit to wash Nixon’s truss.

  77. 77.

    Matt McIrvin

    December 5, 2011 at 10:48 am

    There is no law against the President and Vice-President being from the same state. It’s just that, constitutionally, if a Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidate are from the same state, that state’s electors can’t give their electoral votes to both of them. If the state in question is Texas, that’s pretty important.

  78. 78.

    Catsy

    December 5, 2011 at 12:26 pm

    @Yutsano:

    Newt has a temper. One of Bill Clinton’s best talents was being able to exploit Newt’s temper. He’ll blow up at an inopportune time and the video will go viral.

    It’ll be even worse if he has to face off in a debate against Obama’s preternatural calm.

    I don’t recall who said that Newt was “a stupid man’s idea of what a smart man sounds like”, or something to that effect–but it was spot on. Remember that shining, glorious day when Obama rolled into the Republican Congress and pwned them in their own house? An Obama/Gingrich debate would be that cranked up to 11.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - BarcaChicago  - Off the Gunflint Trail/Boundary Waters 8
Image by BarcaChicago (7/11/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • opiejeanne on Immigration Open Thread: ICE Is Wearing Out Its Welcome (Jul 11, 2025 @ 1:38pm)
  • snoey on Immigration Open Thread: ICE Is Wearing Out Its Welcome (Jul 11, 2025 @ 1:36pm)
  • NotMax on Immigration Open Thread: ICE Is Wearing Out Its Welcome (Jul 11, 2025 @ 1:35pm)
  • Ruckus on Odds & Ends (Open Thread) (Jul 11, 2025 @ 1:32pm)
  • NotMax on Immigration Open Thread: ICE Is Wearing Out Its Welcome (Jul 11, 2025 @ 1:26pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!