• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Cole is on a roll !

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

Prediction: the gop will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

Bogus polls are all they’ve got left. Let’s bury these fuckers at the polls a year from now.

At some point, the ability to learn is a factor of character, not IQ.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

I wonder if trump will be tried as an adult.

There’s always a light at the end of the frog.

Everyone is in a bubble, but some bubbles model reality far better than others!

Republicans do not pay their debts.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Jack be nimble, jack be quick, hurry up and indict this prick.

Everybody saw this coming.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

When we show up, we win.

Come on, man.

It’s a doggy dog world.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / Tree Falls in Forest, Nobody Around

Tree Falls in Forest, Nobody Around

by $8 blue check mistermix|  December 13, 20117:57 am| 54 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

John Huntsman and Newt Gingrich had a foreign policy debate yesterday, and apparently it was well-mannered and carried out in complete sentences.  If you look at Politico’s front page, which is leading with the question of whether Romney is to Gingrich as Clinton was to Obama (whatever the fuck that means), you’ll learn that Sarah Palin is trying to pimp another reality show, but you won’t read anything about the Gingrich/Huntsman debate.  It’s as if the even didn’t even happen.

That’s pretty much the story of Huntsman’s entire campaign:  he does something serious and everyone ignores him.  Nate Silver has a new post detailing the kinds of needles various camels would have to pass through in order for Huntsman to win, and it’s a long, circuitous path.  If you look at the polling, Huntsman has never gotten above a couple of percent, while Newt was up in the double digits many times before his current surge.  Even Rick Santorum beats him consistently.

Sane journalists like Silver and Fallows constantly mention Huntsman because he’s clearly more electable than Newt, and probably Romney.  But to the Republican primary voter, he’s the dork in the corner at the junior high dance.  He’s not even interesting enough to ridicule.  Every dog seems to have its day with the GOP electorate, except for Huntsman.  Since the process of becoming the GOP frontrunner seems inherently irrational, I can’t count him out completely, but at some point he’s going to stop spending Daddy’s money and realize that he should have kept his powder dry until 2016.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Early Morning Open Thread: Happy St. Lucia Day!
Next Post: Ben Smith Becomes King of the Click Whores »

Reader Interactions

54Comments

  1. 1.

    Thomas

    December 13, 2011 at 8:02 am

    Totally. Huntsman needs somehow someway for the Republicans to attract enough moderate voters to their base that one could get away with basic things like, believing science, and not be ostracized for it. He may have to wait longer than 2016.

  2. 2.

    Schlemizel

    December 13, 2011 at 8:04 am

    I get why the baggers will not like Hunstman, he is one of them in spirit but not in form. What I don’t get is how ‘Ol Frothy has not had his moment in the sun. He is as Batshit as Bachmann, as vapid as Cain, as evangelical as Huckabee and speaks in complete sentences like Noot. Why no love for Santorum?

  3. 3.

    ET

    December 13, 2011 at 8:06 am

    Oh my this is funny as HELL!!

    Feel the Newt-mentum

    Popular right-wing talk-radio host Michael Savage has offered Newt Gingrich $1 million to drop out of the race for the GOP nomination because he doesn’t believe the former Speaker of the House can beat President Barack Obama.

    “While it’s true that (Mitt) Romney is not a strong a conservative as many would like him to be, the most pressing issue before America today is defeating Barack Obama. And that is something Newt Gingrich cannot do,” the nationally syndicated Savage said on his blog.

  4. 4.

    Raven

    December 13, 2011 at 8:08 am

    Mornin Joe is KILLING Newt again this morning.

    eta As he applauds Romney for his “free market capitalism” work at Bain!

  5. 5.

    Alesis

    December 13, 2011 at 8:10 am

    Huntsman has no natural constituency outside of the press. He hasn’t been ignored, the man has FAR more free press than his numbers earn. He was highlighted on This Week just this Sunday despite trailing freaking Rick Santorum and not making the cut for the last full debate.

    The reason that debate didn’t get coverage is not that the media doesn’t like Huntsman (they can barely hide the drool) but that they HATE Gingrich.

    I despise them both.

  6. 6.

    MattF

    December 13, 2011 at 8:10 am

    Well, Huntsman is a conservative. QED.

    In other news, Michael Gerson has a WaPo op-ed this morning on Noot. I read it twice, and I think I agree with every single word… until the last paragraph:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-problem-with-gingrichs-simplistic-attack-on-sharia/2011/12/12/gIQAv0nZqO_story.html

  7. 7.

    cmorenc

    December 13, 2011 at 8:15 am

    That Rick Santorum has consistently outpolled John Huntsman among GOP voters would be extremely depressing if Santorum’s support level wasn’t consistently in the low single digits. It’s still a depressing observation of the state of the GOP electorate that Huntsman is more of a fringe candidate than is the nauseating prick Santorum.

  8. 8.

    Alex S.

    December 13, 2011 at 8:20 am

    Nate is only mentioning Huntsman because he wants to build his village credentials. For example, how many articles has he written about Santorum so far? Why does the attention go to Huntsman? – because Huntsman is a semi-rational nominee. But the GOP isn’t a rational party. And Nate isn’t alone.
    I never really thought that Romney could win the nomination (my favorite was Perry), but now I can see him cratering like Giuliani. And the next boomlet would not go to Huntsman, but to Paul. If Paul manages to get some post-Iowa momentum, he could climb in New Hampshire as well.

  9. 9.

    Dave

    December 13, 2011 at 8:24 am

    but at some point he’s going to stop spending Daddy’s money and realize that he should have kept his powder dry until 2016.

    I really thought this was his angle, to be the only “serious” Republican left after the Tea Party craters the GOP in 2012. But then he said all that wackadoodle shit about climate change. I guess he’s a lot dumber than I thought.

  10. 10.

    amk

    December 13, 2011 at 8:32 am

    huntsman lives only in msm and blogs like this.

    And he is no different than the rest of the clowns in terms of policies that hurt most americans.

  11. 11.

    rikyrah

    December 13, 2011 at 8:35 am

    Huntsman is a weasel and I’m glad they’re ignoring his weasel ass.

  12. 12.

    Yevgraf

    December 13, 2011 at 8:39 am

    OT – I gather that the nutwits on the west coast managed to shut down port facilities in Oakland and Portland yesterday. They’re busy with a circle jerk at Kos, roundly abusing anybody who points out that this pointless act did nothing but create enmity from the majority of dockworkers and truckers, many of whom went unpaid yesterday, as evil imports and good exports sat untransferred.

    Some of the funnier comments I saw were those lauding how the Russian Revolution started with a strike in Odessa and that the French dumped their cabbage in the road, as if those were movements which ended up well. The gut bustingest howler was the one about how the East Bay was “the best” during Vietnam – as if those numbnuts accomplished anything.

    Said it before, will say it again – west coast organizers need to sit down and SHUT THE FUCK UP. None of their efforts ever turn out well, and absolutely crush progress in the rust belt.

    Hell, I’m halfway gleeful at the likelihood that some longshoremen will start a hard hat riot, just to make it a little less fun and trendy for west coast leftist emoprogs to come out.

  13. 13.

    Samara Morgan

    December 13, 2011 at 8:39 am

    /yawn

    Huntsman IS Romney to the GOP base– they are both mormons.
    That is the core reason Huntsman cant get traction with the base.
    Nate studiously avoids the Mormon Factor, but its the elephant in the room.

  14. 14.

    Mark S.

    December 13, 2011 at 8:41 am

    Huntsman may be the sanest inmate in the asylum, but that’s not saying much. His tax plan is every bit as regressive as Paul Ryan’s.

  15. 15.

    Amir Khalid

    December 13, 2011 at 8:45 am

    @Dave:
    Either a lot dumber, or a lot less principled. Were I a gambling man, I would bet on the latter.

    I’d assumed Huntsman was running now to gain the coveted “it’s my turn” spot for 2016. But if so, the poll numbers suggest he’s not making the impact he needs with the party’s base to clinch that spot. If he were to pull out after an early-primary wipe-out, his efforts in this cycle would be for naught; he’d have to start the 2016 cycle “from the back of the grid”, as they say in Formula 1. Huntsman needs to salvage a decent performance this time out, perhaps not least to keep dad’s money flowing for next time, and the pandering to climate-change deniers might reflect desperation on that score.

  16. 16.

    Samara Morgan

    December 13, 2011 at 8:46 am

    @Yevgraf: the occupys are doing different things right. some are estivating in forclosed homes, some are occupying the voting booth.
    ‘Occupy the Voting Booth’—Thousands March to Protect the Vote
    That is the power of a leaderless grassroots movement– or possibly its weakness. The occupy movement is actually an insurgency– but its a self-organizing emergent paradigm, and very localized– local groups have their own causes.
    Kinda like Tahir Square or the Taliban.
    And just as hard to stamp out.

  17. 17.

    Barry

    December 13, 2011 at 8:46 am

    Mistermix: “I can’t count him out completely, but at some point he’s going to stop spending Daddy’s money and realize that he should have kept his powder dry until 2016.”

    I think that that was his goal all along, to be the sane one in 2012, while the Tea Party rages and Obama wins. That way he could establish legitimacy in 2016.

  18. 18.

    Samara Morgan

    December 13, 2011 at 8:50 am

    @Alex S.: bam! Nate and Sully both like Huntsman. Both avoid the Mormon Factor.
    Nate refuses to mention it because it will spoil the horserace.

  19. 19.

    Schlemizel

    December 13, 2011 at 8:51 am

    @Yevgraf:
    Had you been paying attention you would see that John covered this ground earlier.

    Theres a thread for that

  20. 20.

    reflectionephemeral

    December 13, 2011 at 8:55 am

    I agree with Alesis at #5. Huntsman has been the beneficiary of the media’s centrist bias. He has no chance, but folks talk about him, because it conceals the fundamental insanity of the Republican Party. When he announced, he got far more coverage from all the major news outlets than Cain, who announced the same day, even though Cain was much more popular.

    The funny thing is, as Mark S. points out, Huntsman’s policy proposals are crazy enough for the GOP. But the GOP doesn’t care about policy; they care about displaying animus toward outsiders. Huntsman seems kind of pleasant, so he can’t win– not without the massive support from the party elite that Romney has.

  21. 21.

    DougJ

    December 13, 2011 at 8:56 am

    I think he’s smart to run as the Official Village Republican this cycle. It worked for McCain in the end.

  22. 22.

    Samara Morgan

    December 13, 2011 at 8:58 am

    @Barry: but he will still be a mormon in 2016.
    the GOP is 50% WEC now, up from 40% in 2008. When Obama wins it will go to 60% or 70%– and Huntsmans chances of getting the nom will be even worse.
    Pew did a survey that showed that anti-homosexual sentiment is declining, but anti-mormon sentiment has remained static.
    Huntsmans mormonism is going to continue to be a big problem with the GOP base.
    i think its hilarious that Nate and the villagers cant even discuss it.

  23. 23.

    Hoodie

    December 13, 2011 at 8:58 am

    Newt’s rise explains why Huntsman will get nowhere. The wingnuts don’t care about policy, they care about symbols, in particular, symbols that signify aggression. They view this as a fight for survival, so the the candidate that shows the proper belligerence has the inside track to the nomination.

    Newt has a host of policy liabilities, but he is getting away with them because he has the right aggressive posture for the base. Huntsman could have all the right wingnut policy positions, such as adopting Ryan’s budget plan, but he still cannot pull off that type of aggression, and it’s doubtful he would ever be able to change that image, due to the mere fact that he deigned to work with Obama. Romney is different. He could pull that off by letting his inner Nixon come out.

  24. 24.

    Samara Morgan

    December 13, 2011 at 9:04 am

    i guess, like suzanne, Nate and the villagers think “we are better than that”.
    Of course a lot of liberals would vote for a mormon if said mormon was running for the dem candidate nomination– but a LOT of conservatives wont.
    And it seems to be taboo to even mention it.
    ;)

  25. 25.

    Samara Morgan

    December 13, 2011 at 9:05 am

    @DougJ: McCain wasnt a mormon.

  26. 26.

    JPL

    December 13, 2011 at 9:20 am

    Right wing radio and most candidates use “work ethic” as a code word. I put on the last four minutes of the debate and Huntsman said Americans are the most productive work force in the industrialized world. He’s toast.

  27. 27.

    Amir Khalid

    December 13, 2011 at 9:23 am

    @Hoodie:
    So Huntsman has been trying to position himself all along as above that fray, as the (relatively) sane one in the Republican race. But sanity is not in fashion this season. It’s dragging him down, in fact, and that’s why he’s not getting the poll numbers he needs. If he tries to fix that by shoring up his Teabagger appeal, there’s no guarantee of success; plus there goes his unique selling point, and he might have problems trying to run on it again on 2016. It must suck to be him.

  28. 28.

    Mark S.

    December 13, 2011 at 9:32 am

    Huntsman’s plan is to go all in in New Hampshire. A fourth place finish and he can quietly drop out.

  29. 29.

    Samara Morgan

    December 13, 2011 at 9:34 am

    @Amir Khalid: it will be even harder for him to secure the nom in 2016, because the percentage of WECs in the GOP will be higher– possibly 60–70%.

  30. 30.

    Samara Morgan

    December 13, 2011 at 9:34 am

    @Amir Khalid: it will be even harder for him to secure the nom in 2016, because the percentage of WECs in the GOP will be higher– possibly 60–70%.

  31. 31.

    Ian

    December 13, 2011 at 9:40 am

    @Schlemizel:
    Remember when he later said that booing gay soldiers might have been poor politics? Too sane.

  32. 32.

    RalfW

    December 13, 2011 at 9:59 am

    Heyya

    Can we get a little traction on Romney’s latest stupidity?

    A Mitt Romney endorsement event in New Hampshire turned incredibly awkward for the Republican presidential candidate after he was confronted by a gay veteran who challenged his

  33. 33.

    Niques

    December 13, 2011 at 10:04 am

    @ET:

    . . . the most pressing issue before America today is defeating Barack Obama.

    Maybe if it is so difficult for anyone on the GOP team to defeat Obama, that means it is not the most pressing issue for Americans today. Did Savage ever think of that?

  34. 34.

    handsmile

    December 13, 2011 at 10:04 am

    Not only will Huntsman still be a Mormon in 2016, but it will have been seven years since he last held elected office. His one term plus one year as governor of Utah (population less than 3M) is his sole experience as an elected official.

    In four years, his role as BFF with Dancin’ Dave and the other Sunday morning Village bobbleheads will not have translated into a national constituency clamoring for Huntsman 2016. A primary challenge that year to Tea Party success story and Utah’s junior senator Mike Lee would be more likely. And if not, he can run always run daddy’s company for as long as he wants.

  35. 35.

    Mark S.

    December 13, 2011 at 10:25 am

    @handsmile:

    That’s an interesting point. There are only 3 candidates who are currently holding office. It used to be nearly all the candidates were holding office. And of those three, two of them are congressmen who never pass any legislation because they are too ideologically extreme.

    Having a track record of being a competent public servant is not a plus in today’s GOP. It makes sense because they hate government so much.

  36. 36.

    Carbon Dated

    December 13, 2011 at 10:28 am

    It’s a little bit incoherent to say that Huntsman, who cannot scrape above “a couple percent” in polls, is “clearly more electable” than the front runners.

    In what way is he “more electable”? I think you mean he is marginally less insane than the clowns driving the short bus.

  37. 37.

    Anonne

    December 13, 2011 at 11:09 am

    I’m glad Huntsman isn’t getting any media oxygen. He’s the most dangerous of the bunch. He isn’t the “reasonable conservative,” he just looks that way. He’s every bit the whack job as the rest, from a policy perspective.

  38. 38.

    William Hurley

    December 13, 2011 at 11:12 am

    I have had a strong suspicion that the GOP’s nominating convention will be brokered, producing the actual candidate who will represent that party but also that that nominee will be Huntsman.

  39. 39.

    Brachiator

    December 13, 2011 at 11:21 am

    Sane journalists like Silver and Fallows constantly mention Huntsman because he’s clearly more electable than Newt, and probably Romney.

    Electable to whom? Huntsman is a fantasy candidate for liberals, the Republican that they like, and that they would want other Republicans to vote for.

    Of course, Huntsman would not be the Democrats’ first or even second choice. I don’t even know that he would be the choice of Independents.

    The only thing he has going for him is that he is as bland as Romney, but not as flip floppy or as crazy as Newt.

    His past record as governor of Utah is nothing that would or should be acceptable to any liberal. That he is supposedly “electable” is only saying that he is the least stinky turd in the bowl.

  40. 40.

    amk

    December 13, 2011 at 11:24 am

    @William Hurley: Yet another firebagger dream ? Not.Gonna.Happen.

  41. 41.

    catclub

    December 13, 2011 at 12:19 pm

    @William Hurley: I would be willing to bet $10,000 that won’t happen. ;)

  42. 42.

    Suffern ACE

    December 13, 2011 at 12:29 pm

    @Brachiator:

    Electable to whom?

    That’s what I want to know. One of the first steps in the process is securing the nomination of one of the major parties. I don’t see him winning the Republican primary or coming close to winning any state primary or caucus except his home state’s. Maybe he could switch parties and run as a Democrat, but he didn’t file his papers to run in those primaries.

  43. 43.

    hells littlest angel

    December 13, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    It would take a sequence of only a few not-unlikely events for Huntsman to win: 1. Callista guns down Newt in a motel bedroom. 2. Romney keels over of a heart attack while attempting a bowel movement for the first time in his life. 3. Ron Paul assassinated by partisans of the North American Federation. 4. Perry accidentally kills himself while cleaning a gun or eating with a fork. 5. Santorum dies of shame after googling his name. 6. Bachmann gets raptured into heaven.

  44. 44.

    Schlemizel

    December 13, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    @hells littlest angel:
    Now you’re making me wish for a Huntsman nomination 8-{D

    It’d be worth it!

  45. 45.

    amk

    December 13, 2011 at 12:42 pm

    @hells littlest angel: Talk about killing fields.

  46. 46.

    William Hurley

    December 13, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    @amk:

    Excellent bumper sticker platitude. Now, how about some reasoning behind the excuse to bandy about insults.

    While you’re contemplating your rationale, give the polling data linked here a peek. Obama’s trailing both Gingrich and Romney in the all-important swing states. Then imagine, if you can or will, the differential when a substantive candidate replaces the 2 GOP clowns in the poll.

  47. 47.

    Brachiator

    December 13, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    @hells littlest angel:

    It would take a sequence of only a few not-unlikely events for Huntsman to win

    And even here, if all this stuff happened, Sarah Palin would jump in and become the nominee by acclamation.

  48. 48.

    William Hurley

    December 13, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    @catclub:

    I’ll take that bet once you establish that you’ve got the $10k and it’s converted to a CD that matures in September.

  49. 49.

    chrome agnomen

    December 13, 2011 at 1:02 pm

    i read where huntsman was asked why he didn’t run under another banner and he replied something like he’d always been a republican and always would be. what exactly does that mean anymore? that is to say, what core values does a person professing to be an ‘old school’ republican have that would differentiate him from today’s average democrat? i guess what i’m saying is how does anyone appearing to be relatively sane call continue to identify with the republican brand? iit should be obvious that the clock is not turning back for the party.

  50. 50.

    amk

    December 13, 2011 at 1:05 pm

    @William Hurley: who the fuck said anything about Obama ? This is the fucking problem with you firebagger types, obama derangement syndrome.

    You should root for newt. srsly.

  51. 51.

    HyperIon

    December 13, 2011 at 1:13 pm

    @Mark S.:

    Huntsman may be the sanest inmate in the asylum, but that’s not saying much.

    True, dat.

    However, I was able to watch/listen to Huntsman without cringing whenever I surfed by the debate and he was talking. He was not batshit insane but then he was discussing foreign policy. He ALMOST said that Iran having a nuke MIGHT not be a problem for the US. Imagine.

  52. 52.

    Nellcote

    December 13, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    Huntsman is getting media play because he’s being pushed behind the scenes by the well connected American Elects:

    http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/category/americanselect/

  53. 53.

    JR

    December 13, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    I don’t think you actually appreciate just how rich the Huntsman family is. Given the amounts spent on his candidacy thus far, I’m pretty sure what we’re seeing is Huntsman keeping his powder dry for 2016. He’s barely spending cash on this race, even though he’d be able to instantly replenish his personal coffers once he ends his campaign.

    I think this cycle was about building name ID and credibility within the party. Even a poor finish still gets him better known nationally than staying in Beijing would have, and he’ll have the chance to make the institutional and personal contacts necessary for a 2016 shot. I’m sure he would have loved to catch fire and win the nomination this time around, but I think he’s been running a six-year plan all along.

  54. 54.

    Edo

    December 13, 2011 at 5:35 pm

    I’m glad Huntsman isn’t getting any media oxygen. He’s the most dangerous of the bunch. He isn’t the “reasonable conservative,” he just looks that way. He’s every bit the whack job as the rest, from a policy perspective.

    word.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Betty on Thursday Morning Open Thread — Nancy Pelosi: Every Day Is A Matter of Life and Death (Apr 18, 2024 @ 8:54am)
  • lowtechcyclist on Thursday Morning Open Thread — Nancy Pelosi: Every Day Is A Matter of Life and Death (Apr 18, 2024 @ 8:52am)
  • Kay on Thursday Morning Open Thread — Nancy Pelosi: Every Day Is A Matter of Life and Death (Apr 18, 2024 @ 8:45am)
  • Uncle Cosmo on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 18, 2024 @ 8:41am)
  • Jeffro on Thursday Morning Open Thread — Nancy Pelosi: Every Day Is A Matter of Life and Death (Apr 18, 2024 @ 8:38am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!