• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

This really is a full service blog.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace.

“More of this”, i said to the dog.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / The Most Wankeriffic Thing You Will Read for the Rest of the Year

The Most Wankeriffic Thing You Will Read for the Rest of the Year

by John Cole|  December 22, 20119:36 pm| 89 Comments

This post is in: Assholes, Both Sides Do It!, Our Failed Media Experiment

FacebookTweetEmail

Bill Adair, at Politifact, attempting to justify their bullshit Lie of the Year:

At a Republican campaign rally a few years ago, I asked one of the attendees how he got his news.

“I listen to Rush and read NewsMax,” he said. “And to make sure I’m getting a balanced view, I watch Fox.”

My liberal friends get their information from distinctly different sources — Huffington Post, Daily Kos and Rachel Maddow. To make sure they get a balanced view, they click Facebook links — from their liberal friends.

Both sides do it! Except, of course, Limbaugh, Newsmax, and Fox are lying, and HuffPo is hardly a liberal site.

It gets worse:

We’ve read the critiques and see nothing that changes our findings. We stand by our story and our conclusion that the claim was the most significant falsehood of 2011. We made no judgments on the merits of the Ryan plan; we just said that the characterization by the Democrats was false.

And you are wrong, and you are idiots. As someone on twitter quipped, if someone bought Politifact and turned it into a direct mail organization, if you said they had killed Politifact, you would win a Lie of the Year award. Cripes, even the NRO agrees calling the plan to end Medicare is not a lie, because REPUBLICANS DO WANT TO END MEDICARE and that is precisely what the bill proposed.

And the grand finale:

Ezra Klein of the Washington Post wrote that this episode was proof that the nation is so divided that “the ‘fact checker’ model is probably unsustainable.”

The most over-the-top response (was it tongue-in-cheek?) was a rant from Jim Newell in Gawker under the headline “Why PolitiFact is bad for you.” He conveniently ignored the fact that our fact-checks are based on hours of journalistic research and portrayed them as the work of rogue bloggers with a gimmicky meter.

“PolitiFact is dangerous,” he said.

Really? It’s dangerous to put independently researched information in the hands of the citizenry?

We got other silly comments from readers who declared we were “a tool” of the Republicans, Fox News and the Koch brothers. Their reaction is typical these days. To paraphrase George W. Bush, you’re either with us, or against us.

In reality, fact-checking is growing and thriving because people who live outside the partisan bubbles want help sorting out the truth. PolitiFact now has nine state sites run by news organizations around the country that employ more than 30 full-time journalists for fact-checking. We’ve inspired many copycat sites around the nation and roughly a dozen in other countries.

And yet, for many of our readers, the love for PolitiFact has always been conditional. They love us when we confirm their views that the other side is wrong — and they hate us when we don’t.

The Broderesque pablum is rife here- “Because both sides attack us, we must be doing something right.”

Klein Jim Newell is right. Politifact, as it is now, is dangerous, because it gives a veneer of objectivity to the kind of journalistic false equivalences which have run this country into the ground, and in this case, deemed an outright truth to be a lie. With that kind of intellectual dishonesty being pumped into our political discourse, you are fucking a right politifact is dangerous.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « What are the odds of overtime play…
Next Post: Thursday Night Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

89Comments

  1. 1.

    The Other Chuck

    December 22, 2011 at 9:41 pm

    Black is white. The fact that both sides tell me I’m wrong is clear proof that black is white, because black is, after all, white.

    For further proof, I point you to the fact that black is white.

  2. 2.

    cathyx

    December 22, 2011 at 9:43 pm

    Listening to Rush for news. Just wow.

  3. 3.

    dmsilev

    December 22, 2011 at 9:43 pm

    The Most Wankeriffic Thing You Will Read for the Rest of the Year

    There are still ~8 days left. You’re being rather optimistic here.

  4. 4.

    amk

    December 22, 2011 at 9:45 pm

    Their righteousness is so touching. So firebaggerish.

  5. 5.

    Egg Berry

    December 22, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    This obviously means they are feeling the heat.

  6. 6.

    cathyx

    December 22, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    @The Other Chuck: And now I know that black is white because I read it on the internet on a liberal site.

  7. 7.

    Benjamin Franklin

    December 22, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    PolitiFact now has nine state sites run by news organizations around the country that employ more than 30 full-time journalists for fact-checking.

    The watchdog which needs watching.

    We are in a crisis of credibility.

    Who has 8 hours or more every day to follow up on false leads and specious facts?

    Who to trust?

  8. 8.

    jl

    December 22, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    Now, now. Let’s not be mean to Politifact. The did say that if Democrats had slightly ‘tweaked’ their message by saying that the Ryan plan would end Medicare as we know it, then it would not have been a lie at all!

    Shame on the Democrats, absent that fateful tweaking it would not have been a lie at all, and would not have been the lie of the year.

    That makes sense, right?

    Remember kids, for some things, minor ‘tweaks’ can make the difference between truth and LIE OF THE YEAR!

    I think that sums up our corporate political culture. And he/she who gets in the last tweak gets the dough.

    Edit: just to be clear, this is snark. I’m giving more evidence that Politifact is making no sense.

  9. 9.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    December 22, 2011 at 9:52 pm

    @Benjamin Franklin: Randomly break off a group of the fact checkers and have them fact check the fact checks.

    So the fact-checking journalists are employed by the companies that need their facts to check out? The big part of Politifacts problem is that they think that journalists are unbiased.

  10. 10.

    Baud

    December 22, 2011 at 9:53 pm

    @jl:

    Remember kids, for some things, minor ‘tweaks’ can make the difference between truth and LIE OF THE YEAR!

    I think you hit the nail on the head.

  11. 11.

    Hunter Gathers

    December 22, 2011 at 9:57 pm

    Why are you such a hyper-partisan? You know, perhaps if you asked the editors of PolitiFact out to a nice lunch, you could find common ground using Hayekan priciples, Burkean modesty, and a healthy dose of moderate viewpoints. You’ll never reach the hallowed ground of pure Centrism if you don’t aspire to fulfill your inner Broderistic tendencies. And stop being so mean to Republicans. They only have the best interests of the country in mind and besides, programs like Social Security and Medicare have outlived their usefulness, they are outdated and have no place in the Free Market of Ideas in the first place. We need to let the Invisible Hand make our decisions for us, for the Hand always has the best judgement. Your irrational partisanship will only hinder the Exchange of Ideas, and all of us will be hindered under the Jackboot of Government Programs designed for a time gone by. You owe an apology to Politifact and you should go ahead and pre-apologize to that Champion of the Market, Mitt Romney, for the many un-hinged attacks you will throw at him, and pray that The Market allows him to become our President, so we can end this Tyranny of the Majority.

  12. 12.

    Benjamin Franklin

    December 22, 2011 at 9:57 pm

    @Belafon (formerly anonevent):

    they think that journalists are unbiased.

    Objectivity is the first myth that should be fact-checked. Human Beans are,just human, after all.

  13. 13.

    jl

    December 22, 2011 at 9:59 pm

    What is the fancy Latin name for this?

    Middle Ground Fallacy
    Golden Mean Fallacy, Fallacy of Moderation

    This fallacy is committed when it is assumed that the middle position between two extremes must be correct simply because it is the middle position. this sort of “reasoning” has the following form:

    Position A and B are two extreme positions.
    C is a position that rests in the middle between A and B.
    Therefore C is the correct position.

    http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/middle-ground.html

  14. 14.

    PeakVT

    December 22, 2011 at 10:00 pm

    Maybe the waaahmbulance can swing by the Politifactless offices after it picks up our whiny millionaire bankers.

  15. 15.

    Benjamin Franklin

    December 22, 2011 at 10:00 pm

    @jl:

    Fallatio…

  16. 16.

    jl

    December 22, 2011 at 10:01 pm

    Also, is the response that they did ‘hours of journalistic research’ special pleading, or appeal to common practice?

    We need the fancy Latin name for those too.

    http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/

  17. 17.

    RSA

    December 22, 2011 at 10:01 pm

    our fact-checks are based on hours of journalistic research

    I see that Politifact has the same understanding of “research” as your average middle schooler.

  18. 18.

    Villago Delenda Est

    December 22, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    Bill Adair, this year’s winner of the Joseph Goebbels “Just what I would have done, Kamerad!” award.

    Congratulations, Herr Adair!

  19. 19.

    SFAW

    December 22, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    The watchdog which needs watching.

    Quis custodiet ipsos canem custodes?

    [Yes, I know it ain’t proper Latin, you illegitimi]

  20. 20.

    jl

    December 22, 2011 at 10:03 pm

    @Benjamin Franklin:

    Fellatio temperantia?

    Not sure I got that right.

  21. 21.

    Citizen Alan

    December 22, 2011 at 10:04 pm

    The one bright spot in all this is that I keep seeing David Broder’s name all over the place and so I get a continual reminder that that fucking pig is dead and roasting in hell. So there is that!

  22. 22.

    SFAW

    December 22, 2011 at 10:05 pm

    Hayekan priciples, Burkean modesty,

    I thought it was “Hayekian modesty”, did I miss something. (That is, more than I normally do, of course.)

  23. 23.

    Villago Delenda Est

    December 22, 2011 at 10:06 pm

    @RSA:

    Counsel for the entire class of average middle schoolers on line two, they demand an apology, or they’re going to sue!

  24. 24.

    Nellie in NZ

    December 22, 2011 at 10:08 pm

    Off topic – more big quakes hit Christchurch this afternoon. 5.8, 5.3. Minor injuries, building damage, and liquifaction.

  25. 25.

    Hunter Gathers

    December 22, 2011 at 10:09 pm

    @SFAW: I don’t really know myself, I was trying to construct some mealy mouthed centrist word salad. And I don’t plan on finding out either, as I have no use for dead conservative philosophers.

  26. 26.

    Cheap Jim

    December 22, 2011 at 10:09 pm

    Why do I care that some pimp uses the phoneme “fact” when describing his whore?

  27. 27.

    Mnemosyne

    December 22, 2011 at 10:09 pm

    We made no judgments on the merits of the Ryan plan; we just said that the characterization by the Democrats was false.

    How did you decide that the Democrats’ characterization of the Ryan plan was “false” if you didn’t look at the merits of the Ryan plan? Flip a coin?

  28. 28.

    burnspbesq

    December 22, 2011 at 10:10 pm

    If you lie when you call something a lie, shouldn’t your punishment be to have to watch the Harry Mudd episode of Star Trek for all eternity.

  29. 29.

    jl

    December 22, 2011 at 10:11 pm

    @Benjamin Franklin: Heeey, buddy, I think you may have tricked me, you bounder.

    Ad Numeram: see Appeal to Common Practice

    This one may come in handy too:
    Ignoratio Elenchi: see Missing the Point


    http://changingminds.org/disciplines/argument/fallacies/fallacies_latin.htm

    I feel so learned, just like William Buckley (RIP).

  30. 30.

    Benjamin Franklin

    December 22, 2011 at 10:12 pm

    @jl:

    The long form…

    Obscenis, peream, Priape, si non
    uti me pudet improbisque verbis
    sed cum tu posito deus pudore
    ostendas mihi coleos patentes
    cum cunno mihi mentula est vocanda

  31. 31.

    PeakVT

    December 22, 2011 at 10:12 pm

    @Nellie in NZ: The people in Christchurch must be really tired of that by now.

    ETA: USGS is reporting three: 5.8, 5.3, and 5.8.

  32. 32.

    cmorenc

    December 22, 2011 at 10:16 pm

    If you try to split the difference midway between truth and lies, the result isn’t simply half-truths any more than splitting the difference halfway between a tasty apple and arsenic isn’t simply a half-tasty apple with a bitter twang. The result is still poisonous in the case of the arsenic-laced apple, and the result is still a poisonously contaminated view of reality in splitting the difference between truth and lies.

  33. 33.

    jl

    December 22, 2011 at 10:16 pm

    @Benjamin Franklin:

    And a cheerful Saturnalian

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
    consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Vestibulum urna nisi, dapibus
    id volutpat et, tincidunt id velit.
    Donec nisi nisl, tristique id aliquet
    dictum, sollicitudin cursus neque.

    to you too.

  34. 34.

    beltane

    December 22, 2011 at 10:18 pm

    @Citizen Alan: The man himself may be dead, but everything he stood for has taken root in a multitude of little Broders. He “died” in the way a dandelion dies, by dispersing his seed to the winds.

  35. 35.

    amk

    December 22, 2011 at 10:18 pm

    @Citizen Alan: amen. may his shriveled soul rot in hell.

  36. 36.

    jrg

    December 22, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    They love us when we confirm their views that the other side is wrong — and they hate us when we don’t.

    Fuck it. Go ahead and convert Medicare into a voucher plan. We’ll see then if the geriatrics consider it to still be medicare.

    This level of “politifact” bullshit exists in this country because too many people let it slide. Start screwing over enough people, and this broderide “both sides do it” nonsense will go the way of the dodo.

  37. 37.

    Benjamin Franklin

    December 22, 2011 at 10:22 pm

    @jl:

    Happy Xmas to you, as well.

    Quid pro quo. Sorry, that’s all I got.

  38. 38.

    Fucen Pneumatic Fuck Wrench Tarmal

    December 22, 2011 at 10:22 pm

    All that politifact is missing, is the principled stand against overheated rhetoric and calls for civility.

    i have to give their spin an incomplete.

  39. 39.

    MonkeyBoy

    December 22, 2011 at 10:23 pm

    OT: if you view Gov Walker’s Holiday Ad: Let’s ‘Put Our Differences Aside’ at YouTube, he didn’t disable the dislike button.

  40. 40.

    wilfred

    December 22, 2011 at 10:24 pm

    “With that kind of intellectual dishonesty being pumped into our political discourse, you are fucking a right politifact is dangerous.”

    Talk about wanking. We’ve had a catastrophic war based on lie after lie and a corporate/bank telethon that subsidized the rich while children go hungry and zero prosecutions. This amongst a host of other lies routinely dumped on people without any accountability.

    But Politifact sucks. How fucking pathetically stupid.

  41. 41.

    Jim Newell

    December 22, 2011 at 10:25 pm

    “Klein is right. Politifact, as it is now, is dangerous…”

    You mean Newell is right! Newell is right!

    [runs off]

  42. 42.

    jl

    December 22, 2011 at 10:26 pm

    @jrg: Um, no, not this they, I don’t love/hate them when I agree/disagree with them. I have complained about these cheezy outfits for awhile, and at least once right here on this miserable lefty blog.

    They are cheezy gimmicks.

    Is the Pinocchio nose thing still in operation? The first time I saw that, I hated the idea.

    The fact checkers have long been on my big irritation list, right below self righteous radical moderate centrist bloggers (who usually reveal themselves to be Perot style insane sooner or later).

  43. 43.

    Bondo

    December 22, 2011 at 10:27 pm

    the first fox quote is the best. Yes, we’re politifact, and our definition of fair and balanced truthtelling is to lie about everyone equally.

  44. 44.

    jl

    December 22, 2011 at 10:28 pm

    @Benjamin Franklin: That was supposed to be Latin nonsense I copied off some typesetting article on Wikipedia. Did it mean something? Did I insult you? I hope not.

  45. 45.

    Mike in NC

    December 22, 2011 at 10:29 pm

    “I listen to Rush and read NewsMax,” he said. “And to make sure I’m getting a balanced view, I watch Fox.”

    My neighbors! Ignorant old white people. Ask them about the war in Iraq and they’d go “What war?”

  46. 46.

    beltane

    December 22, 2011 at 10:30 pm

    @MonkeyBoy: I see he learned nothing from Rick Perry’s foray into YouTubeland.

  47. 47.

    Benjamin Franklin

    December 22, 2011 at 10:31 pm

    @jl:

    I got the humor. DId mine fail?

  48. 48.

    JoeShabadoo

    December 22, 2011 at 10:31 pm

    It’s just sad that you see journalists quoting them without getting embarrassed. If a reporter can’t even verify if something is true or not themselves what good are they? It just shows how worthless the media is when they need some small outfit to verify what they say on their million dollar tv show.

    I’m not surprised that they have a Broderesque view of the facts because they caught on with news and big stations. Do you really think that the establishment would have started quoting this site if it wasn’t always “safe”?

  49. 49.

    Gravenstone

    December 22, 2011 at 10:36 pm

    @jrg:

    broderide

    Portmanteau of Broder and bromide? Me likey.

  50. 50.

    Robert

    December 22, 2011 at 10:36 pm

    Was it someone on the front page here who pointed out that Politifact labeled their original story about “republicans want to kill Medicare” as “somewhat true” rather than a lie at all?

  51. 51.

    jl

    December 22, 2011 at 10:36 pm

    @Benjamin Franklin: My sexytime sense detected a high obscenity quotient in your Latin. I have copied it for indiscriminate use in the comments at appropriate times. Perhaps in response to BJ trollbots.

  52. 52.

    Cat Lady

    December 22, 2011 at 10:37 pm

    Wanking won’t turn lies into truth, no matter how much these fucktards try, and this whole episode just redounds to reality’s credit. Truth has a certain resonance to it, and a force of its own. The only way to make this bullshit stop is ridicule and Adair and Kessler need to be mercilessly mocked. Paging Stephen Colbert.

  53. 53.

    Benjamin Franklin

    December 22, 2011 at 10:38 pm

    @jl:

    It’s actually hilarious prose if you scroll down Wiki, you’ll see the translation.

  54. 54.

    carpeduum

    December 22, 2011 at 10:42 pm

    Oy vey, what a load of excrement. Dkos and Fluffington Puff are not what I call liberal. More like firebagger central and enough lies to make Drudge blush.

  55. 55.

    AnotherBruce

    December 22, 2011 at 10:44 pm

    Here is what I find to be weird about Politfact’s method. If you are to believe that their criticism is valid, then you have to believe that the naming of a thing is more important than the content of the thing. To use a crude example, I offer you a tasty piece of cheese, you assent and I bring you a rock. You look askance and I explain that I am offering you a piece of cheese and it’s tasty and I hope you are stupid enough to bite into it even if it breaks your teeth.

    You know us liberals, we’re all hung up on reality and its liberal bias. There are a number of liars in the political world that can sell chicken shit as chicken salad and rocks as cheese. Politifact, take your place at the table.

  56. 56.

    El Cid

    December 22, 2011 at 10:48 pm

    I hope this isn’t how they used to determine what was and wasn’t true in Encyclopedia Britannica — you know, one side earth goes round sun but other side blah blah and we get criticized by bof!

  57. 57.

    handy

    December 22, 2011 at 11:09 pm

    @jl:

    Fallacy of the excluded Not-Middle?

  58. 58.

    Shalimar

    December 22, 2011 at 11:18 pm

    @jrg: The trouble with this line of “fuck em all” reasoning is that Ryan makes sure no one over 55 experiences the brilliance of his plan. If we could compromise and make it effective for everyone right now, it might be worth it just to see how quickly seniors could form a hoveround mob to go after Ryan.

  59. 59.

    MonkeyBoy

    December 22, 2011 at 11:22 pm

    @jl:

    What is the fancy Latin name for this?
    __
    Middle Ground Fallacy
    Golden Mean Fallacy, Fallacy of Moderation
    __
    This fallacy is committed when it is assumed that the middle position between two extremes must be correct simply because it is the middle position.

    I would call it a “monotonic fallacy”.

    For a monotonic function F that gives values for A and B, then for any D between A and B, F(D) will be between F(A) and F(B).

  60. 60.

    pete

    December 22, 2011 at 11:35 pm

    The email of the fellow who wrote their justification is [email protected].

    Just sayin’.

  61. 61.

    Redshift

    December 22, 2011 at 11:41 pm

    My favorite thing is how he quotes a specific person who believes in the “balance” of insane wingnut sources, but just makes a vague blanket statement about where his “liberal friends” get their information, attributed to no one.

    Probably because even this guy’s friends aren’t stupid enough to actually say they use stuff posted on Facebook as their backup source.

  62. 62.

    dead existentialist

    December 23, 2011 at 12:03 am

    @Benjamin Franklin: The tell is the “30 journalists” in a country of 300 million. Orwell weeps.

  63. 63.

    Cacti

    December 23, 2011 at 12:04 am

    Saying the Ryan Plan ends Medicare = Pants on Fire and the Lie of the Year.

    John Kyl saying that “Abortions are well over 90 percent of what Planned Parenthood does” merely garners a “False” rating.

  64. 64.

    different-church-lady

    December 23, 2011 at 12:10 am

    PolitiFact now has nine state sites run by news organizations around the country that employ more than 30 full-time journalists for fact-checking.

    Jesus, all that and you guys STILL managed to fuck this one up?

  65. 65.

    different-church-lady

    December 23, 2011 at 12:12 am

    @Benjamin Franklin: Please claim your prize internets on the way out.

  66. 66.

    toujoursdan

    December 23, 2011 at 12:15 am

    I don’t know any liberal who gets their news from HuffPo, Maddow and DKos. All the liberals I know get their news from NPR, BBC, NY or LA Times and possibly CNN.

    They may turn to those other sources for a certain amount of context, opinion or infotainment, but the news comes from respected, mainstream, not-very-liberal sources.

    On the other hand, my conservative friends do get their news from Rush, Drudge, NewsMax and Fox. But that’s the difference. Conservatives can’t separate news from opinion.

  67. 67.

    Cain

    December 23, 2011 at 12:42 am

    Now you know why Democratics get it in the shorts every time. We fight with each other, and the external guys like these guys prey on us as well.

    Shit…

  68. 68.

    Richard

    December 23, 2011 at 1:03 am

    Those GOP dicksuckers should change their name to Politifarce.

  69. 69.

    Elizabelle

    December 23, 2011 at 1:29 am

    Krugman’s upped his game against PolitiFarce.

    Today’s column, “The Post-Truth Campaign”, calling Romney out on lying about Obama’s record and character on the campaign trail.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/opinion/krugman-the-post-truth-campaign.html?hp

    Got to love it, though, when he uses Romney’s shamelessness for another whack at Bill Adair’s beloved disrupter of the status quo, fearlessly “holding politicians and pundits accountable for their words.”

    Oh, Mr. Romney will probably be called on some falsehoods. But, if past experience is any guide, most of the news media will feel as though their reporting must be “balanced,” which means that every time they point out that a Republican lied they have to match it with a comparable accusation against a Democrat — even if what the Democrat said was actually true or, at worst, a minor misstatement.

    This isn’t an abstract speculation. Politifact, the project that is supposed to enforce truth in politics, has declared Democratic claims that Republicans voted to end Medicare its “Lie of the Year.” It did so even though Republicans did indeed vote to dismantle Medicare as we know it and replace it with a voucher scheme that would still be called “Medicare,” but would look nothing like the current program — and would no longer guarantee affordable care.

    Rather like that Krugman described the Republicans’ plan, in plain English, which Politifact and its “more than” 30 whip-smart journalists failed to do.

  70. 70.

    Comrade Nimrod Humperdink

    December 23, 2011 at 1:48 am

    “We made no judgments on the merits of the Ryan plan; we just said that the characterization by the Democrats was false.”

    Savor the flavor of that sentence. How does one make no evaluation of, well, anything, while calling the evaluation of another a lie? Is that possible? On what grounds could you base that claim? It hurts…

  71. 71.

    slag

    December 23, 2011 at 2:12 am

    And yet, for many of our readers, the love for PolitiFact has always been conditional. They love us when we confirm their views that the other side is wrong — and they hate us when we don’t.

    I’m truly starting to think that they actually believe their own bullshit. That, in itself, is discrediting enough.

  72. 72.

    wasabi gasp

    December 23, 2011 at 2:43 am

    Replacing us all with a Magic 8-Ball would not put an end to PolitiFact.

  73. 73.

    Mustang Bobby

    December 23, 2011 at 3:58 am

    And yet, for many of our readers, the love for PolitiFact has always been conditional. They love us when we confirm their views that the other side is wrong — and they hate us when we don’t.

    Wow, that sounds really needy. These folks need to get laid more often.

  74. 74.

    Ryan

    December 23, 2011 at 5:01 am

    How did politifact become the go-to site for “objectivity?” What’s to stop me (a retired and handsome man) from starting my own website that actually does provide objective facts?

  75. 75.

    Pat In Massachusetts

    December 23, 2011 at 6:27 am

    Are not these fact checking sites designed so that the average American does not have to exercise their critical thought processes at all? Are not they there to tell us “don’t worry, TRUST US, we did the investigating for you.”? I think that is why every day there is a new poll out telling us how Americans “think” about an issue. I have news. In order for me to “think” and express my views on an important issue, I need more than 30 seconds or a couple of sound bites to do it in, thank you very much.

    I was taught at a very young age to always read between the lines – to always question what is being left out and why. This lesson was taught to me by my Republican father who never finished high school, and who called the television the “Idiot Box”, and thus my TV watching was very limited as a child. He must be flip-flopping in his grave today at the amount of money people pay to watch their Idiot Boxes! Of course, growing up I thought my dad was very mean in not allowing me to watch the latest Monkees episode so I could talk about it with my classmates the next day at school. However, unlike many people my age today (I’m 59), I can begin my day without Fox and Friends, or that nice Ann Curry advising me on the conditions in America. I have eyes and ears, and most importantly, a brain that can process events without the help of polls, people like Chuck Todd or the latest shiny model of “fact checking sites”.

    Thanks, Dad! I owe my independent, critical thinking skills all to you and for which I am now forever grateful!

  76. 76.

    WaterGirl

    December 23, 2011 at 6:50 am

    Here’s what I find interesting about the rebuttal:

    The so-called arbiters of truth and falsehood, ostensibly based on facts, did not provide a fact-based explanation of how and why they arrived at their conclusions that this was a LIE. Neither did they provide a fact based explanation of why this was the LIE OF THE YEAR, as compared with other “LIES”.

    The fact that the rebuttal spoke only to politics and emotional responses is one more big indication that the decision wasn’t fact-based. The Krug-man was right: “…and in the process made themselves useless and irrelevant”.

    It was nice of them to include some of the criticisms all in one place, though. That makes it easier to say, yep, yep and yep when I read the criticisms.

  77. 77.

    WaterGirl

    December 23, 2011 at 6:52 am

    @Pat In Massachusetts: I’m with your rad on everything but not letting you watch the Monkees. That was just wrong. :-)

  78. 78.

    Elizabelle

    December 23, 2011 at 7:21 am

    @WaterGirl:

    Very well put, and critical thinkers (like Pat’s dad) will see that.

    You can’t outsource fact-checking, and you have to get your news from a variety of sources, the better to compare and pull out the facts vs. opinion.

  79. 79.

    Elizabelle

    December 23, 2011 at 7:23 am

    @Ryan:

    Nothing to stop you! Go for it, and link here.

    You will hear soon enough what commenters think of your efforts.

  80. 80.

    Elizabelle

    December 23, 2011 at 7:51 am

    Incidentally, here’s the link to Jim Newell’s “PolitiFact is Bad for You.”

    http://gawker.com/5869817/politifact-is-bad-for-you

  81. 81.

    SFAW

    December 23, 2011 at 8:08 am

    Thanks, Dad! I owe my independent, critical thinking skills all to you and for which I am now forever grateful!

    I don’t believe in the afterlife, but at times like this, I wish there was one, so that your Dad could see this.

  82. 82.

    Maude

    December 23, 2011 at 9:19 am

    I think I remember that NewsMax was started by a guy who used to call into WABC radio in the 1990’s. He called himself Carl from Oyster Bay and he would talk about the so called crimes that the Clintons committed. He was nowhere near the truth and I say this as someone who despises the Clintons.
    You have to give him credit.

  83. 83.

    Jerzy Russian

    December 23, 2011 at 11:08 am

    This is why we can’t have nice things.

  84. 84.

    Catsy

    December 23, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    It is correct that Politifact, as it is currently run, is dangerous–in the same way famously described by Jon Stewart as “hurting America” when he kneecapped Tucker Carlson on his own show.

    But they overplayed their hand badly this time, and it’s going to cost them. Up until now Politifact was still fairly widely respected amongst liberals, on the theory that while they get it wrong quite a bit and dabble in the usual Beltway false equivalence too much, overall they perform a valuable service.

    But this? This is transparent hackery that anyone with eyes and a brain can see. They’re getting an enormous amount of exposure over it, almost uniformly and rightfully contemptuous. They exchanged their long-term credibility for short-term gain.

  85. 85.

    wrb

    December 23, 2011 at 2:32 pm

    Burkean modesty

    Ah, the kind the Newt has.

  86. 86.

    Eric U.

    December 23, 2011 at 4:45 pm

    to be fair, when republicans lie, it’s uninteresting because they do it reflexively, and everyone knows it. When Dems stretch the truth a little, it’s interesting because they do that so little. It does make the job of a Broderian rather difficult.

    In this case, the lie of the year was actually the lie of the year award itself.

  87. 87.

    Catsy

    December 23, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    @Eric U.:

    In this case, the lie of the year was actually the lie of the year award itself.

    This.

    Perhaps the good folks at Politifact are just that subtle.

    …nah.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. House of Eratosthenes says:
    December 23, 2011 at 8:10 am

    […] which is just not supposed to be happening. For writing about this backlash they are now receiving some […]

  2. Politifact’s Lie of the Year Was a Lie « THE FIRST STREET JOURNAL. says:
    December 23, 2011 at 10:37 am

    […] did pointing out the ridiculous nature of leftwing cries embarrass the idiots? Hell, no. In fact, they’re doubling down. Both sides do it! Except, of course, Limbaugh, Newsmax, and Fox are lying, and HuffPo is hardly a […]

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • gvg on Monday Morning Open Thread: Rise and… Feed the Beast! (Jan 30, 2023 @ 9:06am)
  • WaterGirl on Monday Morning Open Thread: Rise and… Feed the Beast! (Jan 30, 2023 @ 9:05am)
  • Betty Cracker on Monday Morning Open Thread: Rise and… Feed the Beast! (Jan 30, 2023 @ 9:04am)
  • Kay on Monday Morning Open Thread: Rise and… Feed the Beast! (Jan 30, 2023 @ 9:03am)
  • Soprano2 on Monday Morning Open Thread: Rise and… Feed the Beast! (Jan 30, 2023 @ 9:03am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!