Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

This country desperately needs a functioning fourth estate.

The willow is too close to the house.

Rupert, come get your orange boy, you petrified old dinosaur turd.

“A king is only a king if we bow down.” – Rev. William Barber

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

“Just close your eyes and kiss the girl and go where the tilt-a-whirl takes you.” ~OzarkHillbilly

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

They punch you in the face and then start crying because their fist hurts.

They don’t have outfits that big. nor codpieces that small.

Also, are you sure you want people to rate your comments?

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

Of course you can have champagne before noon. That’s why orange juice was invented.

Beware of advice from anyone for whom Democrats are “they” and not “we.”

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

The republican ‘Pastor’ of the House is an odious authoritarian little creep.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

I would try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

Marge, god is saying you’re stupid.

The lights are all blinking red.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

I have other things to bitch about but those will have to wait.

You are here: Home / Open Threads / Big Sis probes Baby Doc’s poop chute

Big Sis probes Baby Doc’s poop chute

by | 40 Comments

This post is in: , , ,

Dr. Ron Paul’s son, US Senator Rand “Baby Doc” Paul, set off one of Janet “Big Sis” Napolitano’s terrorist alerts at an airport TSA checkpoint today. After refusing a pat-down by leering Big Sis operatives, Baby Doc was forcibly removed from the line and dragged to a “private screening area,” where he received a full body cavity search.

An engraved metal jacketed copy of “Atlas Shrugs” was found to be the culprit.

Well, not really. But you’d think so given the reaction. I bet those TSA louts let dozens of swarthy Middle Easterners pass through the line unimpeded.

[H/T: YAFB at Rumproast]

Reader Interactions

40Comments

  2. 2.

    The Ancient Randonneur

    I like digby’s take on this one:

    … I cannot help but be reminded of the fact that his home state of Texas just passed a law that goes a good deal further: forced vaginal probes of women seeking an abortion. To me, that seems like at least an equally intrusive state action, but when asked about it his allegedly highly principled father replied: …

    Click the link above to find out his dad’s reply.

  7. 7.

    Zifnab

    Gonna be hard to make a pro-TSA argument around here (or anywhere, really). Rand Paul was in clear violation of Security Theater for daring to blip while standing in a TSA-certified cancer machine. I’m having a hard time showing anything but sympathy for him.

  9. 9.

    giltay

    The talk of the Twitter is that he was flying to an anti-abortion rally. But, of course, he wants the governments hands off of his body.

  10. 10.

    WaterGirl

    I got a shockingly personal pat down at a jimmy buffett concert once. It was annoying but not the end of the world.

  11. 11.

    Maus

    Really, the main surprise here is that Son of Bircher-King allowed himself to be rapeyscanned in the first place.

  12. 12.

    dedc79

    He was on his way to a “pro-life” rally in opposition to Roe v. Wade.

    Rand’s libertarianism is a strange one. Pat-downs are an invasion of his personal liberty but telling a woman what she can or cannot do with her uterus is fine.

  13. 13.

    Boots Day

    I wonder if this will spur Rand Paul to do the hard work of creating and passing legislation that makes the TSA less of a waste of time and money for all American air passengers, or if he’ll just whine to the GOP media about it. Gosh, I can’t wait to see which one it is.

  14. 14.

    Betty Cracker

    @Zifnab: I have no desire to defend the security state. But if someone has to get mashed in its accursed cogs, it might as well be Rand Paul. I can’t abide that smug little prick.

  16. 16.

    Mike G

    I wonder if this will spur Rand Paul to do the hard work of creating and passing legislation that makes the TSA less of a waste of time and money for all American air passengers

    I’d expect this will spur the Repuke Party of Privilege to do the hard work of creating and passing legislation that creates a TSA exemption for members of Congress, while us little people just have to eat it.

  20. 20.

    Comrade Mary

    Where the fuck is my edit button?

    I guess it’s time for everyone to line up while Tunch wields the wand.

  22. 22.

    scav

    Security Theater meets Libertarian Theater. hmmmm. Still rooting for injuries. Remarkably useful default heuristic so far.

  23. 23.

    artem1s

    as per a previous post regarding GPS surveillance…every time one of these privacy issues come up before the Supremes or the Senate or House someone, somewhere needs to make the point that even the elite 1% will be subject to the ramifications of selling off civil liberties in lieu of security kabuki.

  25. 25.

    Frankensteinbeck

    Like any issue involving Pauls I and II, a narrow focus gives exactly the wrong understanding of this issue. Rand Paul did not get rejected from boarding a plane because of unnecessarily tight security restrictions. That’s how you would interpret this from sane viewpoint that TSA security rules are part of the disgusting excesses of Bush’s War On Terror that are now hard to get rid of.

    What happened is that Rand Paul missed his flight because he refused to submit to standard security procedures that would give New World Order agents a chance to search him, perhaps plant trackers or who knows what while they had the chance.

  26. 26.

    ericblair

    @artem1s:

    someone, somewhere needs to make the point that even the elite 1% will be subject to the ramifications of selling off civil liberties in lieu of security kabuki.

    You don’t have to go through the pornoscanner if you have a private jet. Whether or not the 1% can actually wall themselves off from all of the indignities foisted on the rabble, I’m pretty sure they think they’re immune.

  27. 27.

    williamc

    Good god damn, I about busted a gut reading this post’s title!

    And somehow knowing immediately what it was in reference to is a testament to my potty-minded existence…

  28. 28.

    Temporarily Max McGee (soon enough to be Andy K again)

    @Zifnab:

    Gonna be hard to make a pro-TSA argument around here (or anywhere, really).

    How’s that, exactly?

    What was the process in the good old plain-metal-detector years? How many times did one get to set off the buzzers before a more thorough search was conducted?

    It’s not like Paul was stopped while walking down the street and searched for no reason. He was attempting to board what reads to be a commercial flight- which he, like the rest of us, has no constitutional right to board- on which the passengers’ safety is very vulnerable to someone with a gun, knife….or box-cutter.

    Paul wasn’t detained after failing the initial walk-through, either, not held for questioning. He was given the option to accept a pat-down or walk away. He chose the latter option and re-booked on another flight.

    What’s he going to bitch about next? Not being allowed on a roller-coaster for not being allowed to re-measure himself against the outstretched paw of some cartoon character?

  32. 32.

    Randellin

    Do they really need to search a well known congressman like that? I am glad he stood up to our government’s fascist cretin practices.

  33. 33.

    ChrisNYC

    Oh look! This is on the front page at Drudge. What a righteous defender of liberty that guy is.

  35. 35.

    Nutella

    @dedc79:

    Rand’s libertarianism is a strange one.

    No, Rand’s libertarianism is a typical one. Freedom of action for prosperous straight white men is what libertarianism demands. If maximizing the freedom of action of those prosperous straight white men requires forcing a woman to bear her rapist’s baby or preventing black customers from entering a white-owned store if the owner doesn’t like them, he and his fellow libertarians are all for it.

  36. 36.

    Nancy Irving

    Why is he complaining? Aren’t the airlines private companies that, according to Rand Paul, should be able to do whatever they want? After all, he did not have to submit to any of this–he could just have chosen not to fly, just like black people before the Civil Rights Act were free not to stay at hotels, matriculate at colleges and sit at lunch counters.

  38. 38.

    Robert Waldmann

    How can it be that I didn’t think of calling Rand Paul “baby doc” ? How did it happen that I never read that before ? Is it really possible that the blogosphere, the sultanate of snark, didn’t include that analogy until now ?

    And what about Naomi ?

  39. 39.

    Robert Waldmann

    I do have to stress that I didn’t have to read the post to understand who is the new baby doc.

  40. 40.

    Li

    I’m no fan of Rand and his loony idea of what the government should and shouldn’t do. But I’m pretty sure that conducting a mass-molestation campaign against an endless number of perfectly innocent people for the sake of security theatre isn’t good governance. So I feel sorry for him, though perhaps less sorry than I feel for the old ladies that have their colostomy bags taken from them and the like, because he could do something about it if he tried.

Comments are closed.