• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

The republican ‘Pastor’ of the House is an odious authoritarian little creep.

Prediction: the gop will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

Their shamelessness is their super power.

Consistently wrong since 2002

We will not go back.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

This country desperately needs a functioning fourth estate.

I did not have this on my fuck 2025 bingo card.

When I was faster i was always behind.

Many life forms that would benefit from greater intelligence, sadly, do not have it.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Since we are repeating ourselves, let me just say fuck that.

We still have time to mess this up!

DeSantis transforming Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

If you cannot answer whether trump lost the 2020 election, you are unfit for office.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

You cannot love your country only when you win.

“They all knew.”

Someone should tell Republicans that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, or possibly the first.

You would normally have to try pretty hard to self-incriminate this badly.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

So many bastards, so little time.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Elections / Election 2012 / Open Thread: Newt Amidst His Supporters

Open Thread: Newt Amidst His Supporters

by Anne Laurie|  January 30, 20121:27 am| 78 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012, Proud to Be A Democrat, Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail

Dave Wiegel, at Slate, has been following Newt Gingrich around Florida this weekend:

LUTZ, Fla. — Newt Gingrich began his day in one the front pews of the Exciting Idlewild Baptist Church, one of the largest non-airport faciilites I’ve ever seen a Starbucks inside of. The speaker, Callista, and his top Florida surrogate Bill McCollum sat, stood, and sang along for a service tied to Sanctity of Life Day…
__
Gingrich wrapped up and found a good place for a receiving line, right in front of the crowded Starbucks. The chatter from the crowd: Respectful of Gingrich, very forgiving of his “moral values.”
__
“I heard Dick Morris say that Republican women don’t like Callista,” scowled Mary Gaulden, who’d hand-made Newt buttons and affixed them to her shirt. “That’s nonsense. I’ve met Callista, and I can tell you she would bring to the White House a kindred spirit to Jacqueline Kennedy.” The speaker and his wife were saved, and penitent, and that was that…

Jacqueline Kennedy? Ah-HAH!

But the real Red(State) meat was distributed later in the afternoon:

… Newt Gingrich was in The Villages. If you needed to design a last redoubt of the Tea Party voter, a place to collect the older, whiter conservatives who make up the movement, you could do no better than a planned community of at least 75,000 people, with a central census-designated zone of around 8,000, where people under 19 can only stay with permission for 30 days. Gingrich pulled more than 1500 people over to the Sumter Park section of the complex. Parking began outside of a Barnes and Noble. It spilled across the street, with souped-up golf carts sharing space with SUVs, fighting for small patches of grass. Representatives of the Tri-County Tea Party passed out brochures, advertising meetings of 2000 people, showing the markings that previous conservative ambassadors had put on them.
__
Gingrich, taking a stage with his wife beside him, spoke for 27 minutes. The text was a splice-up of Tea Party talk and attacks on Mitt Romney — different flavors of the same soup…
__
Gingrich needed the audience’s help, because the Republican establishment was afraid of him, and (implictly) doing damage… “The truth is we have been served badly, the American people, by the establishment of this country in both parties. Let’s be clear about it. In both parties! It’s time someone stood up for hard-working, tax-paying Americans and said, enough! And if that makes the old order uncomfortable, my answer is: Good.”

Name-brand third-party candidate available, for the right price. Although I sure don’t see the ‘sensible centrists’ at American Select accepting The Newt as their spokesmodel.

“I’m delighted that tomorrow Michael Reagan will be campaigning with me,” said Gingrich, “which should tell you how false the ads were earlier this week by Romney, to suggest that I wasn’t a Reagan Republican. Nancy Reagan said in 1995, ‘Just as Barry passed the torch to Ronnie, Ronnie passed the torch to Newt.’ And Michael will be here to prove tomorrow, to every doubting person, I am in fact the legitimate heir of the Reagan movement. Not some liberal from Massachusetts!”
__
Up to now, Gingrich had been calling Romney a “Massachusetts moderate.” The “liberal” tag was new; it was exactly what the Tea Party was longing for.

Rejected-by-his-own-party Ex-Speaker Gingrich: Zombie Reagan’s Heir! In Revenge of the Golfcart Snowbirds, coming to the Hell’s Octoplex this August…

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Kind of a drag
Next Post: Reasonable, Sane Newt Should Keep Fighting »

Reader Interactions

78Comments

  1. 1.

    dead existentialist

    January 30, 2012 at 1:35 am

    Time to rethink that whole death panels thing.

  2. 2.

    John O

    January 30, 2012 at 1:38 am

    Newt Gingrich: Still a dick.

  3. 3.

    Violet

    January 30, 2012 at 1:40 am

    An older family member of mine lives in The Villages. I wouldn’t peg her as a Tea Party type, but I could be wrong about that.

  4. 4.

    jl

    January 30, 2012 at 1:41 am

    I read LUTZ, Fla, and LULZ, Fla, and thought it was going to be a prank. But, sadly, no.

    The Villages place sound creepy. Won’t catch me there, day or night. Sounds like it is a one of our reptilian overlords’ replicant hideouts, or maybe its hainted with spirrts. Or just, very weird.

    The phrase ‘establishment’ is coming up with Newt. Is them The Villages poeple, ex DFH, who have gone even more bad?

    I wonder if there is ‘The Villages People’ pop group. Would be interesting to see bitter old white people sing and dance.

  5. 5.

    Martin

    January 30, 2012 at 1:42 am

    Name-brand third-party candidate available, for the right price.

    3rd party? Half the GOP hates Romney, who is the face of the party. They hate Congress too. When the party’s establishment approval rating is as low as the GOPs is, you can actually win the party vote by running against the party leadership.

    It’s like the Domino’s ad campaign that ran a while back: “Holy fuck did our pizza suck cock! Did you taste that shit? Please buy our new pizza.”

  6. 6.

    Violet

    January 30, 2012 at 1:45 am

    @Martin:

    “Holy fuck did our pizza suck cock!

    If their pizzas had actually done this, Domino’s would have sold a lot more of them.

  7. 7.

    Suffern ACE

    January 30, 2012 at 1:48 am

    I hope I’m never sucked into one of those “Adult Communities.” I wonder if there is a Village child catcher to find those contraband youth.

  8. 8.

    John O

    January 30, 2012 at 1:49 am

    @Violet:

    Perhaps it’s because I’m up way past my bedtime, but that really made me laugh. Because it’s true.

  9. 9.

    Martin

    January 30, 2012 at 1:50 am

    People never appreciate that the most important part of a joke isn’t the punchline, it’s the setup.

  10. 10.

    John O

    January 30, 2012 at 1:56 am

    I hope Newt, realizing the grifting potential in a drawn out primary battle, stays in it until the bitter end, hurling grenades at Romney. It would all be good news for John McCain.

  11. 11.

    chrome agnomen

    January 30, 2012 at 2:06 am

    @Violet:

    could be that’s what led the hermanator to become godfather ceo.

  12. 12.

    jl

    January 30, 2012 at 2:16 am

    @John O: I heard the Word of Newt on the radio machine just three hours ago or so.

    Listen up peoples! Newt sayeth that the true conservatives Newton himself and Rih Anhorumh, have more combined support than Romney.

    So if the Rih is not prudent enough to step aside for the World Historical Figure in our midst, well, Newt will stride the blast, and take it to the convention anyway for the final reckoning.

    And I think that would just be mighty fine, swell, and terrific, really.

    I think Romney’s ratings will dive as more people are exposed to his style. As I said before, he comes off as a bad swindler breaking out in a flop sweat and getting angry with the mark who doesn’t quite believe the pitch.

    Most successful politicians are good orators. Take your FDR, your Reagan, your Clinton, our Obama.

    Willard is more like a hectorator.

    You can see him going ‘Aw hector, I don’t think they believe this BS’ inside his head. And he comes off like he is trying to intimidate and threaten, in his manner and subtext.

    I think that is because that is what he was trained to do as a take over artist at Bain. After the deal closes, you have them by their money, and you can start intimidating, with a smile. I think Romney has internalized that down into his bones. He cannot ‘maintain’ all the way to the election. His limbic reflex center tells him that the deal should be closed by now and he can start with the heavy manners on the marks, who can’t do much. But long election campaigns do not work that way. The deal is closed after election day.

  13. 13.

    srv

    January 30, 2012 at 2:25 am

    What’s up with Nancy? Michael spiking her meds?

  14. 14.

    jl

    January 30, 2012 at 2:30 am

    @srv: I think you conflated the the Words of Newt with the Words of Nancy. Newt was quoting (quoting in Newt’s not so humble opinion) Nancy from 17 years ago. I wonder of Nancy Reagan ever said such a thing. I cannot believe either Reagan would be so daft. But maybe she was mocking him.

    Anyone know?

  15. 15.

    The prophet Nostradumbass

    January 30, 2012 at 2:37 am

    What’s the newly-minted Catholic Newton Leroy Gingrich doing in a Baptist church?

  16. 16.

    John O

    January 30, 2012 at 2:38 am

    @jl:

    I think that’s a pretty good take, jl. Romney has been so programmed in so many ways since such a young age he just doesn’t seem to have a core, and I think people sense it. This is good:

    As I said before, he comes off as a bad swindler breaking out in a flop sweat and getting angry with the mark who doesn’t quite believe the pitch.

  17. 17.

    srv

    January 30, 2012 at 2:40 am

    Ron Reagan: …He now claims that my mother has annointed him as the one to whom the torch has been passed. I happen to know for a fact that that is not my mother’s view about Newt Gingrich.”
    __
    Green: “So you know Nancy Reagan, Nancy Reagan is a mother of yours and Newt Gingrich is …ok.”
    __
    Reagan: “You got it.”

    So apparently she doesn’t hold a grudge for Newt referring to the Iceland summit as “Hitler-Chamberlain”

    huffingtonpost.com/huff-radio/both-sides-now-newt-reagan_b_1240626.html

  18. 18.

    Chris

    January 30, 2012 at 2:41 am

    @The prophet Nostradumbass:

    What’s the newly-minted Catholic Newton Leroy Gingrich doing in a Baptist church?

    Newt Gingrich is as loyal to his churches as to his wives, methinks.

  19. 19.

    just me

    January 30, 2012 at 3:04 am

    There is a simple, non-creepy reason for the age restrictions in communities like “The Villages”. It’s taxes and schools. Residential communities that can guarantee that no children will be added to the local school system can often be zoned in where normal residential populations cannot.

  20. 20.

    paramedicx

    January 30, 2012 at 3:05 am

    Frank Lutz, FL.

  21. 21.

    Chris

    January 30, 2012 at 3:06 am

    @srv:

    So apparently she doesn’t hold a grudge for Newt referring to the Iceland summit as “Hitler-Chamberlain”

    Funny how we forget the little things. Like how we now remember Reagan as a total God Of Conservatism who totally had a plan to bring down the Soviet Union and was on top of things the entire time.

    As opposed to the second half of the 1980s, when the hard right kept looking at the evidence that the Soviets were falling to pieces, screaming “It’s a trap!” and denouncing anyone who, like Reagan, was dumb enough to fall for it as a communist agent.

  22. 22.

    Anne Laurie

    January 30, 2012 at 3:26 am

    @just me:

    There is a simple, non-creepy reason for the age restrictions in communities like “The Villages”. It’s taxes and schools. Residential communities that can guarantee that no children will be added to the local school system can often be zoned in where normal residential populations cannot.

    Well, except that it leads to the distinctly creepy (and, I would argue, un-American) scenario where the post-childrearing Elders in “The Villages” refuse to support the existing schools, because “Our kids are done, and we don’t care whether other peoples’ kids get a decent education”… frequently with an extra dollop of “those trailer-trash spawn of unwed teenager sluts / illegals who don’t even speak English / ghetto minority thugs in a holding pattern until they’re old enough for juvie”, depending on location and personal prejudice. No matter how you remember it now, Gramps, other people paid towards your education, and if you think you got shorted on that bargain, the self-respecting thing would be not to cheat the rising generation.

  23. 23.

    Calouste

    January 30, 2012 at 3:36 am

    Gingrich, taking a stage with his wife beside him, spoke for 27 minutes.

    Sounds like exactly the right length for when you’re addressing the Tea Party.

  24. 24.

    Chuck Butcher

    January 30, 2012 at 3:55 am

    @Anne Laurie:

    the self-respecting thing would be not to cheat the rising generation.

    Class of ’71 in Central Ohio and I was not cheated and neither were my fellows in that school. 9-12, 900 students with a choice of 4 languages, 4 choices of musical instrument organizational styles, 2 choices of vocal, various ‘clubs’, and anything from voc ed to top level college prep. Sr Adv Math was freshman collegiate level calculus and advanced algebra, 2nd yr Chem & Bio were collegiate level entry courses, same across lib arts courses. It wasn’t cheap to do and the results were born out in ACT/SAT, Nat Merit, college rankings of acceptances, job placements, etc. The graduating class list of college acceptances read like a who’s who of top Universities – straight up public educational system.

    FYIGM should be completely foreign to this country…

  25. 25.

    Spence

    January 30, 2012 at 3:56 am

    Well, Mrs. Kennedy turned a blind eye to adultery in the White House; I wouldn’t be surprised if the third Mrs Gingrich carries on her legacy in that manner. Poor Zhack-leen! Callista looks like a dessicated Jackie-O drag queen.

  26. 26.

    Mike S.

    January 30, 2012 at 4:14 am

    Summers, Geithner, Emmanuel, Daley, Lew…
    plus Obama’s transition to office team was a bunch of Citigroup schmucks.
    Barack Obama campaigned on letting the Bush tax cuts expire (for the top 2%), yet once in office he remained silent on that issue ’till the very week the bill was to expire. In the run up (ie when it mattered), the President was MIA.
    Bowels-Simpson? Entitlement Reform? Ahahahah! The Presidents cronies are gunning for Medicare and Social Security. Obama is no new-dealer, Obama is not a progressive!

    Clinton signed Gramm-Leach-Bliley.
    DiFi’s husband, Dick Blum, uses UC’s money to invest in his own businesses and acts like he doesn’t understand when the people complain about it. The UC was buying mortgage backed securities in 2007… did our financially sophisticated Regents get taken for a ride? No. Regent Gould was formerly Senior VP at Wachovia… looks like the Big Banks unloaded garbage paper on the UC.

    So, yes, both parties.

  27. 27.

    BGK

    January 30, 2012 at 4:39 am

    So the Newt’s appearance with the lesser Reagan reisdue will be this afternoon within walking distance of my office. I wonder if anyone at work will front my bail money?

    Regarding the Villages and school taxes: Florida school districts are all county-based, and school property taxes are levied at the county level. Doesn’t matter if it’s 55-and-over only, or a development patterned after “Logan’s Run,” everyone gets levied the same millage, no exceptions.

  28. 28.

    MikeJ

    January 30, 2012 at 4:39 am

    @Mike S.: You’re a fucking moron. Show me where Obama’s “cronies” have had the slightest effect on Medicare.

    The tax cuts for the rich? Yeah, Obama wanted to get rid of them, but they were the price paid for continuing unemployment insurance. You already know that though, you just neglect to mention it because you’re a fucking liar, or a fucking moron, or both.

  29. 29.

    Emerald

    January 30, 2012 at 5:02 am

    @MikeJ: Not just unemployment insurance. He also got START and the repeal of DADT in that deal, including some other major goodies. I think the payroll tax deduction was in that deal too.

    The critics don’t realize that those tax cuts were going to be extended anyway, because if we’d let the middle class ones expire it would have pushed the economy into a dive. So they were going to be extended. The Republicans wanted ten years for the top brackets. Obama got ’em down to two years, with all those other goodies thrown in.

    And the looney left says he can’t negotiate. He’s cleaned their clocks every time.

  30. 30.

    Samara Morgan

    January 30, 2012 at 5:09 am

    May i remind you that Dave Weigel voted Paultard in 2008 and is still a “libertarian”?
    If hes sneering at Newt its only to elevate his own personal brand of insanity.

  31. 31.

    dance around in your bones

    January 30, 2012 at 5:29 am

    …scowled Mary Gaulden, who’d hand-made Newt buttons and affixed them to her shirt.

    There is something so sad about this…’hand-made Newt buttons’; I mean….really?

  32. 32.

    geg6

    January 30, 2012 at 6:35 am

    If Newt and Calista are “saved,” they are in deep shit with the Catholic Church, sorry to say. Rome tells us that Catholics are saved when they are baptized, but it is not the same as the “saved” that Protestant evangelicals mean. And to undergo the Protestant evangelical version of being saved would be a major heresy.

    Of course, it’s all bullshit anyway, but I’m going to taunt my wingnut Catholic acquaintances with this. They will scramble to find some sort of theological justification for it, but there is none. Catholic dogma says no fucking saving by heretics. Period.

  33. 33.

    Professor

    January 30, 2012 at 6:52 am

    Why is it that consevatives always live in the past? Why can’t they look to the future? We always hear about the ‘good old days’ but good for whom? Please somebody put me out of my misery!

  34. 34.

    Southern Beale

    January 30, 2012 at 6:53 am

    I read that dateline as “LOLZ, FL” not “LUTZ.” I think mine was more accurate.

  35. 35.

    Southern Beale

    January 30, 2012 at 6:57 am

    @jl:

    Just saw your comment.

    We both need more coffee.

  36. 36.

    Southern Beale

    January 30, 2012 at 7:10 am

    This is so funny, I nearly crapped my pants: Sarah Palin telling her fans to vote for Newt if for no other reason than to …

    “So, if for no other reason to rage against the machine vote for Newt, annoy a liberal.”

  37. 37.

    dmsilev

    January 30, 2012 at 7:29 am

    @Southern Beale: Clearly, Palin is in tune with the conservative zeitgeist.

  38. 38.

    Linda Featheringill

    January 30, 2012 at 7:34 am

    Newt is running against The Establishment? Does that make him a disestablishmentarian? He converted to Catholicism and embraced disestablishmentarianism?

  39. 39.

    kay

    January 30, 2012 at 7:44 am

    @Mike S.:

    Barack Obama campaigned on letting the Bush tax cuts expire (for the top 2%),

    He actually campaigned on two things there.
    The other thing was that he wouldn’t raise taxes on those making less than 250k a year.
    I just think it’s interesting that the second part is never mentioned.

  40. 40.

    jeffreyw

    January 30, 2012 at 7:45 am

    @Linda Featheringill: His disestablishmentarianism is entirely situational. I’m sure he is, in his heart, an antidisestablishmentarian.

  41. 41.

    Shalimar

    January 30, 2012 at 7:50 am

    @jl: Nancy Reagan did actually say it, though Gingrich leaves off the part after his name where she said “Newt and the other congressional Republican leaders”. She was also speaking in 1995, when Newt was at the height of his power, before Clinton’s reelection. I suspect that since then she has regretted saying anything complimentary about the narcissistic blowhard.

  42. 42.

    kay

    January 30, 2012 at 7:50 am

    @Mike S.:

    Summers, Geithner, Emmanuel, Daley, Lew…

    Former DNC chairman and former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean said Wednesday that William Daley would be a “huge plus” for the Obama administration if he is tapped to be the president’s new chief of staff.
    Dean praised Daley as someone “who knows Washington, but he also is not of Washington.” At the same time, the former presidential candidate excoriated Obama’s senior staff.
    At a breakfast sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor, Dean refused to single out any administration officials for criticism, but said Obama would be better served by staff that has not spent so much time in Washington.
    Noting that many officials are “either out of the White House or going,” Dean blasted Obama’s current officials who he says have treated the left wing of the Democratic Party with “contempt.”
    “As they say, don’t let the door hit you in the you-know-what on the way out,” Dean said.

    Just want to correct the record there. Howard Dean endorsed Daley for Chief of Staff.

    The Presidents cronies are gunning for Medicare and Social Security. Obama is no new-dealer, Obama is not a progressive!

    Dean’s endorsement was based solely on the fact that Howard Dean knows Daley personally, and likes and trusts him.

  43. 43.

    Linda Featheringill

    January 30, 2012 at 7:58 am

    @jeffreyw:

    :-)

  44. 44.

    ant

    January 30, 2012 at 8:02 am

    the largest non-airport faciilites I’ve ever seen a Starbucks inside of.

    In a church?

    I wonder how the flying sked monster feel about that.

    Seem otta place in my mind. but I aint been to church since I was a teenager.

    weird.

  45. 45.

    Donut

    January 30, 2012 at 8:06 am

    @kay

    And whaddaya know, a whole bunch more votes can be found in the under 250k brackets. Gosh, why would Barack Obama “cave” on the cuts to the top brackets like that?

  46. 46.

    DanielX

    January 30, 2012 at 8:15 am

    What is that sound I hear at places like the Villages? It is the sound of demographic desperation. Every now and then we do get desperate (h/t to J. Geils Band) and these folks are more desperate than most. Newt is telling them what they want to hear, but the background noise says the next two or three elections will be the swan song of the Republican party unless the party broadens its appeal (impossible given wingnut influence) or elected Republicans resort to wholesale disenfranchisement (partially accomplished already).

  47. 47.

    kay

    January 30, 2012 at 8:17 am

    @Donut:

    I had such a funny conversation with an 80 year old man here, who was yelling at me because Obama hasn’t raised taxes on the rich.
    He was in the front seat of a car and I was in the back seat, and I just listened to the whole rant (really long) and then reminded him about the second half of the promise. He remembered that.
    He was good, actually. He accepted that this might be a complication he hadn’t considered, and we were both wondering why the second half of what was often a single sentence is never mentioned.
    Wasn’t that the entire focus of the Joe the Fake Plumber incident? Under 250k?

  48. 48.

    Doug

    January 30, 2012 at 8:24 am

    I read somewhere that The Villages were the STD capitol of the country. How about no taxpayer support for STD treatment?

  49. 49.

    liberal

    January 30, 2012 at 8:30 am

    @kay:
    But the Summers and Geithner criticism is dead on.

  50. 50.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    January 30, 2012 at 8:33 am

    Just a quick point: snowbirds are by definition Canadian, which means they don’t vote… and besides, all of the Canadians I know (which is quite a few, given that I am one) thinks that Dog on Car is off his nut, let alone Revolting Amphibian.

  51. 51.

    Southern Beale

    January 30, 2012 at 8:36 am

    TN’s most notorious homophobic state senator, Stacey Campfield — author of our “don’t say gay” bill and recently in the news for claiming heteros only “rarely” catch AIDs/HIV — was refused service at a Knoxville restaurant. The proprietor said he wanted Stacey to know how it feels to be unfairly discriminated against.

    Right wingers are having a hissy fit, calling it hypocrisy and everything else. So NOT.

  52. 52.

    kay

    January 30, 2012 at 8:39 am

    @liberal:

    I just object to the implication that Obama is somehow outside the Democratic Party.
    He isn’t. One can object to Obama, and one can object to the Democratic Party, but setting Obama somehow outside the mainstream of the Democratic Party is nonsense.
    The Democratic Party exists. It’s a collection of individuals. It isn’t a theory. Obama is squarely in the center of that group of individuals, ideologically.
    To me, it’s exactly like the conservatives who say one or another person isn’t a “real” Republican. They’re not dealing with what is. They might have a better theory for the Republican Party, but the Party they describe does not actually exist.
    The truth is Howard Dean has always trumpeted being a tightwad, as far as budgeting. Always. But that doesn’t fit within the current frame of his being a “progressive”, so we never mention it.
    Dean liked Daley, because he knows Daley. So does that make Daley a “crony” of Deans? I don’t know, but I would suggest that these things are interrelated and complicated.

  53. 53.

    Unsympathetic

    January 30, 2012 at 8:41 am

    Newt Gingrich: The Reagan you always wanted to remember, with none of the no-good reality-based decisions you wanted to forget!

    Gingrich/Ryan – winning!

  54. 54.

    Egg Berry

    January 30, 2012 at 8:45 am

    So does that make Daley a “crony” of Deans?

    What does “crony” even mean? Is it like “czars”? Just another demeaning term that has no value except for bomb-throwing?

  55. 55.

    Shawn in ShowMe

    January 30, 2012 at 8:46 am

    @kay:

    I had such a funny conversation with an 80 year old man here, who was yelling at me because Obama hasn’t raised taxes on the rich.

    An 80 year old man who is angry that the President hasn’t raised taxes on the rich? I don’t think this is the type of angry white man accounted for in Rasmussen polling. Bless his heart.

    Long term, the introduction of class warfare into the public consciousness may be the significant development of the last four years. This is an example of how the bully pulpit is supposed to work — the people hit the streets (OWS), and the Prez follows their lead by hammering the class issue home on the campaign trail.

  56. 56.

    kay

    January 30, 2012 at 8:50 am

    @liberal:

    Where’s Howard Dean in the Democratic Party?

    I do not believe in free health care or free anything,” he says. “If you want to totally reform the health care system, I’m not your guy. Just expand the system we already have to include everybody. I’m not interested in having an argument about what the best health care system is.”

    I just want to stay tethered to reality. Both Obama and Dean are Democrats.

  57. 57.

    kay

    January 30, 2012 at 8:51 am

    @Shawn in ShowMe:

    An 80 year old man who is angry that the President hasn’t raised taxes on the rich?

    Well, yeah, but it’s self-interested, because he’s worried about Medicare, but still.
    It’s good he’s looking to revenue :)

  58. 58.

    Frankensteinbeck

    January 30, 2012 at 9:24 am

    @kay:
    No, this meme is far less fair and more blind than that. Obama has been anything but kind to bankers and hedge managers and the rich in general. Wall street reform, creating the meme that the rich aren’t paying their fare share, new regulations on industries across the board – Obama’s actions prove this entire ‘he works for Wall Street’ meme is bullshit. Their evidence is that he has Wall Street people on his staff. If on the one hand his actions have always been hard on bankers, and on the other hand he knows a few, anybody who thinks he’s owned by the banks is engaging in conspiracy theory.

    Hell, Mike S brought up Simpson-Bowles. Anyone who so much as mentions them seriously needs to be dismissed as a deranged paranoid. Obama’s had the best opportunities any president has ever had to gut the safety net, and instead he expanded the Hell out of it and gave a major speech about how everything they’d recommended was immoral.

    There is no there there on these accusations. They consist of wishes he’d destroyed people he’s already waged war on, and purist paranoia that having experts on your staff means you secretly worship causes they may not even have.

  59. 59.

    kay

    January 30, 2012 at 9:34 am

    @Frankensteinbeck:

    No, this meme is far less fair and more blind than that.

    I can’t stand this one in particular, though, because it reminds me so much of the Right.
    “They’re not real Republicans!”
    Yeah, actually, they are.
    What conservatives are objecting to is the reality of the Republican Party. There is no alternate Republican Party. There’s just the one. I’ll grant them a sort of aspirational Republican Party, one that could conceivably be better if it had wholly different members, but that Party does not, in fact, exist.
    To me, one can’t get to aspirational or “better” w/out starting at reality. They skipped a step.

  60. 60.

    kay

    January 30, 2012 at 9:39 am

    @Frankensteinbeck:

    A lot of these themes, I think, are based on omissions.

    One example that drives me crazy is “Obamacare is exactly like Romneycare”

    It is if you don’t include 9 million poor people. They leave Medicaid expansion out. I’ve come around to thinking it’s better if we leave Medicaid out, because there’s no real political support for helping poor people, so better we all just ignore that and hope no one notices, but still, that’s a rather LARGE omission, 9 million people.

  61. 61.

    kay

    January 30, 2012 at 9:51 am

    @Frankensteinbeck:

    I was laughing in the last GOP debate, because Santorum kept saying Romneycare was Obamacare, and that characterization relies on a giant omission, Medcaid expansion, but I decided it works in my favor if we don’t discuss poor people AT ALL, it’s better if any poor people help goes completely under the media radar, so I’m sitting there, cheering him on.

    “Go! GREAT comparison!”

    I think I’d rather they discuss the imaginary health care law rather than the real health care law :)

  62. 62.

    Frankensteinbeck

    January 30, 2012 at 9:52 am

    @kay:
    It’s a bigger omission than that. The expansion of health care is a wonderful thing, but it’s the tip of the iceberg. The iceberg is two thousand pages of regulations to bring health care costs into line, most of which put the insurance industry in a vice.

    All the major anti-Obama narratives are based on ignoring the man’s historically great record while taking a few actions out of context so that they SOUND bad. It’s so extreme that I can’t criticize him at all, because there’s no way to sort out anything he’s actually bad about from the bullshit lies and misrepresentations used to attack him.

  63. 63.

    Frankensteinbeck

    January 30, 2012 at 9:59 am

    @kay:
    I’ll give them this, he absolutely did not find a way to overcome congress’s scarily, inexplicably unanimous desire to keep Guantanamo open and block any legal justice in any way. I can’t see anything he could have done against the kind of 90-8 majorities that laugh at a veto threat, but hey, he did fail.

  64. 64.

    kay

    January 30, 2012 at 10:35 am

    @Frankensteinbeck:

    It’s a bigger omission than that. The expansion of health care is a wonderful thing, but it’s the tip of the iceberg. The iceberg is two thousand pages of regulations to bring health care costs into line, most of which put the insurance industry in a vice.

    Oh, I agree. It’s just that these things can (occasionally!) work to our advantage.

    Santorum doesn’t know what it’s in the health care law, and either does Wolf Blitzer, and thank goodness for that!

    Finally, we catch a fucking break :)

  65. 65.

    Shalimar

    January 30, 2012 at 10:37 am

    @Egg Berry: Not sure about everywhere else, but in old-style Alabama politics “crony” had a specific meaning. It was a non-elected official who supported the governor and did all the dirty work of getting him elected and getting his policies passed. In return, the cronies got rich from rigged contracting deals.

    George Wallace’s cronies were very proud of their status. It probably started as an insult, but they used it in their favor when talking with voters and even reporters.

  66. 66.

    phoebes-in-santa fe

    January 30, 2012 at 10:50 am

    @Shawn in ShowMe: Hey, I’m a little old lady myself and in the top 3% and I am furious the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy were extended. I don’t pay enough in taxes so I am especially generous in donating what I would have paid in real taxes to charites for animals and children.

    Becoming older sometimes makes a person more aware of the inequities in life and more appreciative for what they themselves are fortunate to have. And for the need to “pay it both BACK and FORWARD”.

  67. 67.

    JGabriel

    January 30, 2012 at 11:33 am

    Dave Weigel via Anne Laurie @ Top:

    The speaker and his wife were saved …

    As a raised, though inactive and agnostic, Papist, Catholics don’t do “Jesus Saves”. We do conversions, and they’re slow, with lots of reading and priest-talking. Ask Newt.

    If Newt & Callista have been “saved”, I think their bishop might have some problems with that.

    That said, it’s not a quote from anyone, and is probably just Weigel’s woefully wrong interpretation. If Weigel’s not Catholic, he probably isn’t aware of the sniffy & snobbish attitude of disdain most Catholics have for the sudden and impulsive nature of a “Jesus Save”.

    Also, what geg6 said — with the caveat that it’s probably Weigel’s error, not Gingrich’s.

    .

  68. 68.

    JGabriel

    January 30, 2012 at 11:39 am

    Dave Weigel via Anne Laurie @ Top:

    … a central census-designated zone of around 8,000, where people under 19 can only stay with permission for 30 days.

    Whoa. Is that legal?

    .

  69. 69.

    shortstop

    January 30, 2012 at 12:13 pm

    All, right, AL; I stand corrected on the Jackie wannabeism.

  70. 70.

    liberal

    January 30, 2012 at 12:31 pm

    @kay:
    Where did “Mike S.” imply Obama was outside the mainstream of the Democratic Party?

    Obama is squarely in the center of that group of individuals, ideologically.

    What’s your evidence for that?

  71. 71.

    liberal

    January 30, 2012 at 12:33 pm

    @Frankensteinbeck:

    Their evidence is that he has Wall Street people on his staff.

    No, actually, “their” evidence is that in terms of policy and actual actions, Obama has not been hard on the banksters.

  72. 72.

    RedKitten

    January 30, 2012 at 12:41 pm

    The irony is that a sizeable percentage of the residents of The Villages are Canadian. I know of at least five couples in my mom’s generation who go down there after Christmas and stay until April. And that’s just within my small circle of acquaintances.

  73. 73.

    Scott P.

    January 30, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    I just saw an astonishing statistic over at Sully’s place. In the 2008 Florida Republican primary, 75% of Republican voters were over 45, and 44% were over 60. I know Florida is where conservatives go to retire, but daaayum.

  74. 74.

    stinger

    January 30, 2012 at 1:35 pm

    “Name-brand third-party candidate available, for the right price.” LOL – you’ve nailed it. Third-party allows him to continue to run/grift without any risk of actually becoming President.

    I’m fascinated by the notion that Callista is “penitent”. Has she publicly repented for her 6-year affair with a married man?

    I’m also fascinated by Baptists embracing Catholics, who, as all Baptists knew when I was young, are going to hell.

  75. 75.

    Anne Laurie

    January 30, 2012 at 4:34 pm

    @polyorchnid octopunch:

    Just a quick point: snowbirds are by definition Canadian

    I believe our Canadian neighbors invented the concept, but now even the Boston newscasters use it for New Englanders (mostly retirees) who spend their winters down in Florida. So do the ‘snowbirds’ I’ve met. And it’s not just regional, because it’s also widely used in upper lower Michigan (around Traverse City), where the tourism industry makes a big chunk of its profits on snowbirds between Memorial Day and Thanksgiving.

  76. 76.

    Newtron Bomb

    January 30, 2012 at 5:14 pm

    I am the true heir to Vladimir Ilyich Saint Ronnie. Just read his testament diary.

  77. 77.

    gnomedad

    January 30, 2012 at 7:00 pm

    I am in fact the legitimate heir of the Reagan movement.

    Enemies of the Heir Beware!

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. How Can We Encourage This? | Southern Beale says:
    January 30, 2012 at 7:26 am

    […] Palin, the cover girl of Republican politics with an IQ hovering around that of a box of hammers, on why Republicans need to vote for Newt Gingrich: “So, if for no other reason to rage against the machine vote for Newt, annoy a […]

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Dan B - Late Fall and early Winter Seattle Gardens 1
Photo by Dan B (3/10/26)

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Recent Comments

  • gene108 on Wednesday Morning Open Thread (Mar 11, 2026 @ 8:50am)
  • Ella in New Mexico on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Mar 11, 2026 @ 8:50am)
  • Paul in KY on DHS Open Thread: Backtrack!… BACKTRACK! (Mar 11, 2026 @ 8:48am)
  • NotMax on Wednesday Morning Open Thread (Mar 11, 2026 @ 8:48am)
  • Eyeroller on Plagues & Pandemics Update – March 11, 2026 (Mar 11, 2026 @ 8:47am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!