• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”

The lights are all blinking red.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

I might just take the rest of the day off and do even more nothing than usual.

“woke” is the new caravan.

“But what about the lurkers?”

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

The unpunished coup was a training exercise.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

Disappointing to see gov. newsom with his finger to the wind.

I did not have this on my fuck 2025 bingo card.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

I would try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

No one could have predicted…

In my day, never was longer.

“Just close your eyes and kiss the girl and go where the tilt-a-whirl takes you.” ~OzarkHillbilly

Come on, man.

Today in our ongoing national embarrassment…

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Elections / Election 2012 / I wish I knew how to quit Newt

I wish I knew how to quit Newt

by DougJ|  January 31, 201211:33 pm| 48 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012, Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

I’m not ready for the Republican primary to be over. I’m not ready to hear about how Romney got his mojo and Hayekian modesty back. I’m not ready to stop hearing about how the moon can apply for statehood (no, really).

Tell me we’ve got a few more weeks of this, even if you don’t believe it.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Komen for the Cure Cuts Planned Parenthood Funding for Breast Cancer Screening and Health Services
Next Post: An Exaltation of Larks, A Surfeit of Targets »

Reader Interactions

48Comments

  1. 1.

    Rhoda

    January 31, 2012 at 11:35 pm

    Doug, Doug, Doug, the south will rise again!

  2. 2.

    West of the Cascades

    January 31, 2012 at 11:39 pm

    We’ve got a few more weeks of this … how can Newt NOT compete in the Mississippi & Alabama primaries on March 13th?? And have the chance to “get back” at Romney in a few more debates? He has to do that at least for his own bloated ego, if for no other reason.

  3. 3.

    General Stuck

    January 31, 2012 at 11:39 pm

    Tell me we’ve got a few more weeks of this, even if you don’t believe it.

    I do believe it, yes, yes, they will never conquer the Newtster. He is indomitable, even if mean and crazy, and who knows what’s what with the wingnut party these days. They may wake one morning, look at Romney, and say WTF? is it with this RINO Cinderella standing on my podium.?

  4. 4.

    Cacti

    January 31, 2012 at 11:40 pm

    DougJ, look at it this way. Florida was the equivalent of a nuclear strike on Gnewt by GOP Inc. and the Romney campaign…

    And “Not-Romney” was still the choice of more than 50%.

    Gnewt’s not going anywhere.

  5. 5.

    jrg

    January 31, 2012 at 11:43 pm

    Newt didn’t quit when his entire organization walked out the door. There’s no way he will quit now. The only way he’ll quit is if his financing dries up. Even then, I’m not so sure.

    What does he have to lose? Is he forgoing some sort of valuable contribution to society by spending the next few months flinging linguistic turds?

  6. 6.

    Vodkamuppet

    January 31, 2012 at 11:43 pm

    Oh don’t worry, this freak show’s gonna go on for at least a few more months. I swear though, didn’t I read a few weeks back that Newt won’t be on the Virginia ballot because his staff screwed up the petition and didn’t submit it on time? Santorum too?

  7. 7.

    The Dangerman

    January 31, 2012 at 11:49 pm

    I’m not ready to stop hearing about how the moon can apply for statehood.

    Dude, Florida’s so yesterday; it’s on to Nevada, where the most important thing EVAR will be Yucca Mountain.

  8. 8.

    Xenos

    January 31, 2012 at 11:49 pm

    Just got up, put the coffee on, checked drudge to see what the GOP edgy-cool-but-establishment take on the results would be:

    Romney wins a ‘LANDSLIDE’ over Newt, 46% to 32%!

    Can you win in a ‘landslide’ with less than 50% of the votes?

  9. 9.

    Mike E

    January 31, 2012 at 11:50 pm

    It’ll be like Groundhog’s Day.

  10. 10.

    Martin

    January 31, 2012 at 11:51 pm

    I’m not ready to stop hearing about how the moon can apply for statehood

    Moon-Firster!

  11. 11.

    Tonal Crow

    January 31, 2012 at 11:53 pm

    What’s the problem?

    If Newt’s the nominee, the general public will rebel at his crazy and elect Obama.

    If Romney’s the nominee, the teatards will rebel at his RINOness and stay home, thus electing Obama.

    Either way, look for the teatards to yank the GOP even farther into crazyland.

  12. 12.

    Mike in NC

    January 31, 2012 at 11:54 pm

    We heart the Newtster forevah!

  13. 13.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 31, 2012 at 11:56 pm

    I think the best possible Newt Scenario for Willard is that he (Willard) manages to find the right combination of bribery and flattery to ease the lizard out of the race, which would be hard for anybody to do, never mind an entitled princeling who thinks a backwoods country squire has been insolent enough to question his birthright. And even if that best case scenario played out, you would have a resentful, volatile “ally” who could potentially blow up the fort from within.

    Or Newt goes full-on neo-Dixiecrat with… Perry? Zell Miller? Bipartisan crazy-ass racists on parade?

  14. 14.

    The Dangerman

    January 31, 2012 at 11:56 pm

    @Tonal Crow:

    …the teatards will rebel at his RINOness and stay home…

    The Republicans could nominate Hillary Clinton and the Plain WHITE T-shits will crawl across shards of broken glass to vote against That One.

  15. 15.

    Tonal Crow

    January 31, 2012 at 11:58 pm

    @Vodkamuppet: Yes indeed. And then this tremendous foe of “judicial activism” sued Virginia to be added to the ballot, arguing that the ballot-access requirements violate the 14th Amendment. I kid you not.

  16. 16.

    Spaghetti Lee

    January 31, 2012 at 11:59 pm

    I want it to be as long and bloody as possible for tactical reasons, and yet…I am so sick and tired of these assholes dominating the news cycle, every fuckin’ day.

  17. 17.

    Tonal Crow

    February 1, 2012 at 12:01 am

    @The Dangerman: If that were so, turnout in the Republican contests should be far above 2008. It hasn’t been so far. That said, I’d like to see teatards crawling in broken glass. Maybe we could tell them that it builds character?

  18. 18.

    lamh35

    February 1, 2012 at 12:08 am

    Michelle Obama on Jay Leno looking lovely!!!!

  19. 19.

    Vodkamuppet

    February 1, 2012 at 12:09 am


    I figured it would play out like that somehow. So this means republicans love the 14th amendment now, right?

    ETA: HTML is not working on my phone. That was intended for Dangerman.

  20. 20.

    stickler

    February 1, 2012 at 12:11 am

    Newt can “stay in” as long as he likes, but without that sweet, sweet cash money he’s toast. How many more checks is the Family Adelson going to write? Can he find another sugar daddy in time? He clearly has no ground game beyond “I don’t like Mitt” anyhow.

    On the other hand … the man is crazy and mean, and good at throwing bombs to boot. So who knows.

  21. 21.

    pete

    February 1, 2012 at 12:11 am

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: Now you come to mention it, bribery and flattery are exactly how Mitt made his fortune. And money is certainly on Newt’s agenda. So maybe … but overall I think Newt’s ego will drive him as long as his sugar daddy will buy the gas. To the moon!

  22. 22.

    The Dangerman

    February 1, 2012 at 12:12 am

    @Tonal Crow:

    If that were so, turnout in the Republican contests should be far above 2008.

    Not sure that’s so; Obama isn’t on the ballot and Romney isn’t setting them on fire.

    Their base will turn out in November; the Indy’s, however, will swing to Obama.

  23. 23.

    Scott P.

    February 1, 2012 at 12:17 am

    Oh don’t worry, this freak show’s gonna go on for at least a few more months. I swear though, didn’t I read a few weeks back that Newt won’t be on the Virginia ballot because his staff screwed up the petition and didn’t submit it on time? Santorum too?

    Only Romney and Paul managed to submit the correct 10,000 signatures to get on the ballot. Gingrich and Perry were just over, but when invalid signatures were taken into account, they fell short. Yes, that’s the mark of a stupid campaign.

  24. 24.

    Hill Dweller

    February 1, 2012 at 12:21 am

    Charlie Pierce eviscerated Romney’s acceptance speech.

  25. 25.

    Calouste

    February 1, 2012 at 12:23 am

    @Scott P.:

    IIRC, the differnce with previous elections was that previously the Democratic and Republican parties “checked” their candidates signatures. Other candidates signatures were checked by the state. That didn’t sit well with a third party candidate, who successfully sued to have all signatured checked by the state. Gingrich and Perry didn’t get that memo and thought the old boys rules still applied. Shades of the Clinton 2008 campaign there…

  26. 26.

    slag

    February 1, 2012 at 12:23 am

    Wait. Newt hasn’t gone out on us, has he? Is this another one of your chicken little impersonations, DougJ?

  27. 27.

    Tonal Crow

    February 1, 2012 at 12:24 am

    @Vodkamuppet: Oh yeah, here’s a legal discussion of the district court decision dismissing the ballot-access suit by Gingrich et al.

  28. 28.

    Jewish Steel

    February 1, 2012 at 12:26 am

    Dude, Newt’s got a few more extended solos in this set. They’re gonna play Casey Jones and Ripple for sure.

    The nice thing about pentatonic scales is there really are no wrong notes. The nice thing about appealing to R voter’s basest instincts is that there really are no wrong notes.

  29. 29.

    suzanne

    February 1, 2012 at 12:27 am

    Oh, he’ll stay in. That spiteful little tool hates Dog on Car so much that he wants to watch him lose. Petty, table of one….

  30. 30.

    Martin

    February 1, 2012 at 12:31 am

    @Tonal Crow: No, you have it right. The number of voters who are anyone-but-Obama isn’t as large as it might seem.

    This election should be a mirror of 1980, to listen to the GOP. But the turnout in 1980 GOP primary wasn’t exceeded until 1996 and even then the turnout was barely higher. The enthusiasm to get Carter out of office was measurable in the GOP primary turnout.

    We saw the same thing in 2008 on the Dem side. Dem primary turnout was HUGE. Double in some cases over 2004. The result of the general election wasn’t exactly a shock as a result. If the GOP manage a win here in 2012, it’ll be a complete shock based on primary turnout so far. Maybe that’ll change, but I doubt it. There’s a LOUD anyone but Obama group out there, but not a large one, or else they’d be voting – and they aren’t.

  31. 31.

    Tonal Crow

    February 1, 2012 at 12:31 am

    Somewhat OT, but suzanne’s message above reminded me that I haven’t seen any mention of Dogs Against Romney here.

  32. 32.

    The Dangerman

    February 1, 2012 at 12:41 am

    @Martin:

    The enthusiasm to get Carter out of office was measurable in the GOP primary turnout.

    True, but Reagan was in the primary; I vaguely recall those days (I was a Republican straight out of High School; I got over it). Reagan was a hero from the start.

    Mitt just isn’t exciting the “masses” like Ron did.

  33. 33.

    Calouste

    February 1, 2012 at 12:44 am

    @Martin:

    84, 88 and 92 all saw an incumbent President or VP running in the GOP primaries. People are unlikely to be enthousiastic to vote if the outcome is more or less a foregone conclusion.

  34. 34.

    Tonal Crow

    February 1, 2012 at 12:48 am

    @The Dangerman:

    Mitt just isn’t exciting the “masses” like Ron did.

    Exactly. He’s not exciting them now, and I don’t see any reason he’ll excite them more should he become the nominee, particularly because he’ll have to tack significantly left to make up ground among “swing voters”.

  35. 35.

    Hill Dweller

    February 1, 2012 at 12:49 am

    @lamh35: FLOTUS showed some good comic timing when describing Willard’s singing.

  36. 36.

    The Dangerman

    February 1, 2012 at 12:56 am

    @Tonal Crow:

    Exactly. He’s not exciting them now, and I don’t see any reason he’ll excite them more…

    I’m a little young to recall the Carter years well (I was too busy sneaking into my Dad’s Playboy collection), but I don’t recall the hate for Carter was the same as the hate for Obama. Maybe it’s because of the Fairness Doctrine of the time (not to mention the news was only the Big 3).

  37. 37.

    Kane

    February 1, 2012 at 1:05 am

    From what I understand, the earliest that the eventual nominee will gather enough delegates is June.

  38. 38.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    February 1, 2012 at 1:18 am

    Boy are things topsy-turvy in wingnutland. Nutpicking over at Redstate yielded this piece:

    Watch MSNBC for unbiased coverage!
    krish Tuesday, January 31st at 11:06PM EST (link)
     
    The fat lady is still in the middle of the concert! Not warmed up yet – watch MSNBC to see where Newt won & Romney won. Conservatives still voted for Newt – thank you to all FL conservatives & keeping the hope alive.
    It is sad to see Fox & Fox News – not reporting that much ….one thing that we found out from FL primary is that we now know that all the people in Fox & even Drudge have been compromised …they have joined the establishment. It is sad to see Matt Drudge also has joined the establishment team (Fred Thompson also pointed this out). I am very disheartened by so many people who I thought were solid conservatives from Coulter, Ingram, Drudge etc. show their true colors! I want to say heartfelt thanks to Sarah Palin! There is still some hope for conservatives!

    The anti-Romney forces are being pushed to watch MSNBC for “unbiased coverage”? You know that The End of Times has to be near…lol! That nuthouse is just about rioting in any thread about the primary. Banning has resumed but very selectively; old timers who say that they will sit the election out or even go so far as to vote Obama haven’t been BLAMMED! yet. They’re trying shaming for now but it isn’t working so far.

    TPTB at Redstate are trying to get people in line for the inevitability of Romney in the general and it’s pissing members off. What emboldens the rioters there (IMO) is that Erickkk, Son of Erickkk, hasn’t endorsed anyone yet. That and his anti-Romney stance is emboldening the villagers to shout and wave their pitchforks and torches at the management. I sense a weakening in EE’s resistance to a Romney Presidency so that will be something to watch out for there.

    It will be interesting to see what happens at Redstate at that point, it might be indicative R’s response to Romney in the general. That and it will be fun to watch the last big riot there before the election…lol!

    It’s cheap entertainment, especially after having to suffer the assholes throughout Cheney-Bush.

  39. 39.

    Martin

    February 1, 2012 at 1:22 am

    @Calouste: True, but that wasn’t the case in 96, and turnout in 96 barely exceeded the turnout in 80, when the country was 20% larger in population.

    And it wasn’t just that Reagan was in the race in 1980 (he was in previously, and the turnout wasn’t there). It was that there was energy for a change in the country and voters acted in favor of that change. That’s not happening this year.

  40. 40.

    Donut

    February 1, 2012 at 1:24 am

    @ Spaghetti Lee @ 16:

    You said it. Ever since the last debate I’ve lost a little of the mojo. Yet, I think it is delightful that the G-Unit stuck that ridiculous placard on the podium tonight, proclaiming 46 states left to go, and asserted again that he will be back in Tampa. He’s like the Terminator, I guess? Newtminator? Gingrinator?

    Help me out here, I put in a 12 hour day at work.

  41. 41.

    dogwood

    February 1, 2012 at 1:32 am

    It’s pointless to speculate about what Newt is going to do. Newt doesn’t know what he is going to do or say from one minute to the next. A lot of people around here are probably too young to remember, but Newt’s tenure as Speaker was one undisciplined clusterfuck.

  42. 42.

    Martin

    February 1, 2012 at 1:37 am

    @The Dangerman: There wasn’t hate for Carter, but there was discouragement. Iran, Afghanistan, oil, jobs, broader economic changes that we were slow to respond to, and the Soviets were playing a strong hand at the time and we were not long after Watergate and Vietnam. America felt a bit defeated.

    I think the GOP has massively overplayed their hand against Obama. I don’t deny that parts of the country feel discouraged, but not defeated. Other than jobs and income stagnation (which are serious things) we’re not facing all of the other crap. By and large, things are looking up. We’re out of Iraq, we’ve had some good successes lately – OBL, Libya, hostage rescues. We’re in better shape than Europe. The auto industry is coming back. There’s a fair bit to be optimistic about, and the public is slowly coming around to that view. Demonizing Obama against that backdrop is only going to backfire.

  43. 43.

    Roger Moore

    February 1, 2012 at 1:51 am

    @Odie Hugh Manatee:

    The anti-Romney forces are being pushed to watch MSNBC for “unbiased coverage”?

    Just remember “unbiased” means “saying what we want to hear”. At the moment, that happens to be MSNBC rather than Faux News, but don’t expect it to stay that way for long.

  44. 44.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    February 1, 2012 at 2:37 am

    @Roger Moore:

    That’s what I’m waiting on. :) If Romney wins the primary and loses the general, Faux will be perceived to have led to the loss. Same with the other Romney supporters, the True Conservatives will hate them with a burning passion that threatens to consume them if not unleashed. We really need Romney to win the Republican primary if we want to see maximum damage done to it. If he does that and the South doesn’t follow along then all hell is going to break out on the right.

    I voting for Hell to win the day. :)

  45. 45.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 1, 2012 at 3:15 am

    Have heart DJGE, the ABM got 54% of the vote, and that is in the face of somewhere around $21 per goddam vote in media advertising alone. Yes, based off 770K Mitt votes vs $16M media. wow.

  46. 46.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 1, 2012 at 3:55 am

    @Martin:

    There wasn’t hate for Carter, but there was discouragement

    You think, maybe?

    Iran hostages, oil embargo gas lines, gas price spike, inflation busting interest rates that steamrolled housing, and etc. I’m not laying all that on Carter, but try winning a damn election – obviously, a Chimp’s straightman won.

  47. 47.

    rikryah

    February 1, 2012 at 9:38 am

    did Newt win the part of Florida that might as well be Alabama?

  48. 48.

    ShadeTail

    February 1, 2012 at 10:49 am

    @Tonal Crow:

    That said, I’d like to see teatards crawling in broken glass. Maybe we could tell them that it builds character?

    No, we’d have to tell them we wouldn’t like them to do it. Whatever pisses off the liberals, after all.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Mike in Oly - Woodard Bay Natural Resources Conservation Area
Image by Mike in Oly (5/24/25)

Recent Comments

  • Ruckus on Open Thread: Concerning Senator Fetterman (May 24, 2025 @ 7:49pm)
  • bbleh on Open Thread: Concerning Senator Fetterman (May 24, 2025 @ 7:46pm)
  • sab on Saturday Afternoon Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 7:45pm)
  • schrodingers_cat on Saturday Afternoon Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 7:44pm)
  • Another Scott on Saturday Afternoon Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 7:43pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!