• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

In my day, never was longer.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Susan G. Komen for the Lure and the art of deception

Susan G. Komen for the Lure and the art of deception

by Soonergrunt|  February 6, 201212:28 pm| 63 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, Republican Venality, Schadenfreude

FacebookTweetEmail

I was about to write a post on this, but as usual, the faster and smarter front pagers beat me to it.  My take is this–in the HuffPo column by Laura Bassett, both the Susan G. Komen For the Lure foundation, and the article’s writer Bassett, blame Planned Parenthood for SGKFTL’s own goal, with absolutely no evidence to back that up:
The author states, without attribution: <blockquote>The charity struggled to deal with the pressure, especially in a face-off against Planned Parenthood, an organization whose fine-tuned political team has experience in these high-pitched, high-stakes debates.</blockquote>
and then later in the column: <blockquote>”Komen’s not equipped to spend its days fighting political battles,” the source said. “Abortion is not our issue, and I think [leadership] tried to finesse a way out of it, and this investigation criteria was the solution. And it blew up in their faces. They were just naive in the face of [the] incredibly sophisticated Planned Parenthood operation.”</blockquote>
The columnist does say that the insider who gave her the information “was furious about the cave[in to PP]” but gives no context to the assertions that Planned Parenthood put a shiv into SGK.

As long as SGK can delude itself into thinking that they were mau-mau’ed by a very effective Planned Parenthood, they will continue this behavior, as will any other organization that learns that particular “lesson.”  They are, along with their partners and friends in the conservative blogosphere, and apparently at the Huffington Post, working very hard to change the narrative of the story to one of bravely standing up to a shake down by a bunch of baby killers, only to have the rug pulled out from under them by those same baby killers rallying their baby-killing-loving supporters.  Now perhaps, being a bear of very little brain, and liking honey too much, I didn’t notice the huge PR push by Planned Parenthood.  I thought it looked like a huge number of women reacting to the betrayal by a charity that claimed to be all about women’s health, taking a huge shit all over another organization that is primarily about women’s health.  But that is because I don’t suffer from the siege mentality that conservatives live under.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « It’s a small hole, but Cthulu is a resourceful guy
Next Post: Not exactly a sneak attack »

Reader Interactions

63Comments

  1. 1.

    schrodinger's cat

    February 6, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    According to the Chunky Doughboy, SGK’s cutting of the funding for PP was ok because they don’t conduct mammography. I wonder when was the last time Chunky went in for a breast exam for his man boobs? Love how wingers conflate breast exams with mammograms. Idiots.

  2. 2.

    Bullsmith

    February 6, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    To those out to kill PP, the org itself is inherently evil. Thus whatever it does is by definition corrupt. It fought back, ipso facto, it conspired against those attacking it.

  3. 3.

    Brachiator

    February 6, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    Komen is a non-profit. They can shut down and let their work be done by the American Cancer Society.

    Or they can STFU and fund Planned Parenthood.

    Women’s bodies and health are not divisible.

  4. 4.

    Bullsmith

    February 6, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat: Douthat’s position is, I presume, that those poor folks can simply visit their physicians and obtain the necessary reference. They can even do it while eating cake, if they like.

  5. 5.

    Soonergrunt

    February 6, 2012 at 12:36 pm

    @Bullsmith: But did PP actually fight back? All I saw was them going “huh, what?!” and women across the country going all “Patrick Swayze in Road House” on SGK.

  6. 6.

    schrodinger's cat

    February 6, 2012 at 12:40 pm

    @Soonergrunt: No silly, it was the ebil MSM, that went against widdle pro-lifers. According to the god botherers, they are invisible to the media and the political establishment. If only..

  7. 7.

    shortstop

    February 6, 2012 at 12:43 pm

    @Soonergrunt: You’re right that we ladies in the field certainly made our shrill nagging voices heard, but PP did handle it very effectively from its end. They’re the ones who put out the press release alerting America to the defunding, and Cecile Richards was immediately and continuously on TV and radio explaining why this decision would hurt (and kill) women. PP didn’t miss a chance to get its message out consistently and convincingly.

    In contrast, Komen did nothing for many, many hours before finally putting up a disastrous and non-credible defense on FB and its own site. Brinker didn’t even hit TV until well into the day after the story broke, and we all know how effective she was when she got there.

    We should give PP credit for handling this perfectly, but you’re absolutely right that this wouldn’t have worked unless 80 percent of people who heard about the defunding reacted negatively.

  8. 8.

    gene108

    February 6, 2012 at 12:43 pm

    If you want heads to role at SGK, make sure their corporate sponsors realize this is the tip of the anger from those angry at defunding PP.

    80:1 negative comments on Yoplait’s FB page is a start and not the end of the kind of fear we need to strike into the hearts of corporations for crossing us.

    The hard part is doing this without coming off like some shrill nut-job, which some protesters, such as Code Pink or PETA or whatever can come off as with attention grabbing stunts.

    The protest has to be outreach to like minded folks, who aren’t aware how extreme right-wingers are, but don’t much go for publicity stunts.

    There is no right-wing equivalent to copy this sort of left-wing action. The Right-wingers enjoy screaming and hollering and the people they are trying to reach respond effectively to that sort of posturing.

  9. 9.

    jl

    February 6, 2012 at 12:44 pm

    If one were cynical, one might hypothesize that for our current crop of reactionaries, an organization trying to pull off a politically driven grant funding decision run by reactionary incompetents, while lying about it, and then furiously back peddling after the truth gushes out for all to see, is entrapment by liberals.

    BTW, whs that reactionary truth squad goofball been indicted yet for voter fraud?

  10. 10.

    Maude

    February 6, 2012 at 12:45 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat:
    That’s like saying you can’t see Tunch.

  11. 11.

    SiubhanDuinne

    February 6, 2012 at 12:45 pm

    their partners and friends in the conservative blogosphere, and apparently at the Huffington Post

    Redundant.

  12. 12.

    kc

    February 6, 2012 at 12:47 pm

    As long as SGK can delude itself into thinking that they were mau-mau’ed by a very effective Planned Parenthood

    If that is part of what happened, good on PP, I say. Why should the right wing do all the mau-mauing, by God!

  13. 13.

    Culture of Truth

    February 6, 2012 at 12:48 pm

    Poor, sad, naïve, unsophisticated, apolitical SKG… [ sobs ]

  14. 14.

    shortstop

    February 6, 2012 at 12:48 pm

    @gene108: Edit button gone again? Sigh.

    I was going to add that what Komen calls “an incredibly sophisticated operation” consists mostly of PP people 1) telling a story engagingly without defensiveness or goalpost moving, and 2) making themselves fully available to media. Neither of these things should be rocket science to a gigantic, well-funded organization like Komen.

  15. 15.

    schrodinger's cat

    February 6, 2012 at 12:48 pm

    @Maude: Here is Rod Dreher lamenting about it.

  16. 16.

    beltane

    February 6, 2012 at 12:48 pm

    I think it’s safe to say that Planned Parenthood has saved the lives of far more women over the years than the Susan G. Komen Foundation has. I’m not really sure why anyone at this point would continue to support an organization that is nothing more than a PAC for right-wing socialites and their husbands.

  17. 17.

    Midnight Marauder

    February 6, 2012 at 12:48 pm

    The charity struggled to deal with the pressure, especially in a face-off against Planned Parenthood, an organization whose fine-tuned political team has experience in these high-pitched, high-stakes debates.

    Personally, I don’t really mind if people come away with the impression that fucking with Planned Parenthood results in the deployment of a “fine-tuned political team” that “has experience in these high-pitched, high-stakes debates.”

    That is awesome.

  18. 18.

    trollhattan

    February 6, 2012 at 12:49 pm

    By the time they’re done pivoting, the SGK grants to PP will have been Capone/Chicago-style payoffs to feed PP’s protection racket. (“Nice pink nonprofit you’ve got there, we’d hate to see anything happen to it.”)

    They’ll take a page from the GCC denialists and assert PP’s supporters are all in the pockets of “Big Abortion,” harvesting vast sums of money and power. It’s a neat trick if you can keep your BP below imminent explosion levels while watching it unfold.

  19. 19.

    JGabriel

    February 6, 2012 at 12:49 pm

    Shorter SGK: Waaahhh! No fair! The liberals hit back!

    .

  20. 20.

    gene108

    February 6, 2012 at 12:50 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    I’d add NPR.

    Heard an NPR piece about SGK that basically ignored the amount of money that went to “education” by stating they give millions to research and started the piece with an interview of a Komen breast screening center in Texas, which is solely funded by SGK, to highlight that without SGK that center would go belly up, so therefore liberals need to STFU already.

    They did have a blurb from a scientist, who said SGK should give more money to preventive research rather than research into better treatments, but that really doesn’t address the issue about how much money goes for pink ribbons versus actual research.

  21. 21.

    Culture of Truth

    February 6, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    Mitt Romney has called for a right-wing cancer fund so powerful no one will even think of challenging it.

  22. 22.

    low-tech cyclist

    February 6, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    “Komen’s not equipped to spend its days fighting political battles,” the source said.

    Komen hired Ari Fleischer a few months back. The only reason to have an Ari Fleischer on your payroll is because you are a conservative organization that is drooling at the prospect of fighting some political battles.

    The only people they are fooling in this talk about their naivete are themselves.

  23. 23.

    beltane

    February 6, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    @Culture of Truth: Yes, all those mean, tough-talking sluts from Planned Parenhood are so horrible to be ganging up on those poor, sweet Susan G. Komen prom queens.

  24. 24.

    schrodinger's cat

    February 6, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    @gene108: Ok we should be polite while protesting, should we also bring totebags to the gunfight?

  25. 25.

    Soonergrunt

    February 6, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    @shortstop: Thanks for the correction. But whatever PP did, it was very low key, or at least it seemed that way. I NEVER heard anything about a reaction from them in all the mess, and I do try to be involved and educated. Of course, being the slow brother on Balloon-Juice, I miss things. At least I got my shirt buttoned properly today.

  26. 26.

    MTiffany

    February 6, 2012 at 12:55 pm

    Now perhaps, being a bear of very little brain, and liking honey too much, I didn’t notice the huge PR push by Planned Parenthood.

    The clearest sign that a person is probably right is their willingness to admit the possibility that they may be wrong.

  27. 27.

    ImJohnGalt

    February 6, 2012 at 12:57 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat: “Hey, we’re not playing tote bags here” – Mitt Romney.

  28. 28.

    Linda Featheringill

    February 6, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    being a bear of very little brain, and liking honey too much

    One of my heroes. Very Zen.

  29. 29.

    Culture of Truth

    February 6, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    “Sophisticated” = “can operate a computing device”

  30. 30.

    Karen in GA

    February 6, 2012 at 1:01 pm

    Right-wingers don’t realize that it’s possible to get angry and speak up all by yourself, without someone else telling you what to think and how to react. So to them, the huge outcry must have been coordinated by Planned Parenthood; it couldn’t have been people learning about it, deciding all by themselves that it sucked, and taking it upon themselves to complain.

    And of course, there’s their belief in their own bullshit. In their world, the majority of Americans think the same way they do; the only problem is those leftist fringe extremist freaks that run everything and keep getting in the way. (Seriously, in what other world would Ari Fleischer make any kind of living as a PR consultant?)

    So there’s no way there could be any legitimate outcry against what they do.

  31. 31.

    Redshift

    February 6, 2012 at 1:01 pm

    “Abortion is not our issue, and I think [leadership] tried to finesse a way out of it”

    In addition to the usual crap, there’s a relatively new tactic here, “we just want to avoid politics, so we’re doing what conservatives want.” There was another instance of this a month or so ago, but I can’t quite remember who it was (corporation, I think?)

    This is important to watch for. I think we have an opportunity to keep another wingnut victim meme from gaining enough traction to become effective. The lesson should be learned in no uncertain terms: if you want to claim to be avoiding politics, don’t decide either way based on some customers/supporters/donors’ political views. Trying to “avoid” a political issue in a way that punishes the side conservatives want punished is actually jumping into politics with both feet, and should be loudly and repeatedly called out as a laughable lie.

    In future cases, it should help to be able to point to Komen, where it was a really obvious lie.

  32. 32.

    Culture of Truth

    February 6, 2012 at 1:02 pm

    @beltane: Those Saul Alinskly sluts! Just like those wily Acorn thugs and those dirty brainy Mexicans!

  33. 33.

    Jay S

    February 6, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    @Soonergrunt: I’m with you on missing the push from PP. From what I read PP started with some interviews and then went largely silent in public. Whatever they did behind the scenes didn’t leave any obvious finger prints for my aging eyes to see.

    ETA I have assumed that the strong arm accusation was just an attempt to vilify PP without much basis in fact.

  34. 34.

    Privatize the Profits! Socialize the Costs!

    February 6, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    Well, like most people, when I give money to a charity, I’m really hoping to find one whose CEO makes half a million dollars a year—!!!

    One staffed by Republicans, which pays huge consulting fees to former Bush administration members—!!!!

    </snark

    Seriously, after all this publicity, can anyone actually believe that this @#$% grifters foundation hasn’t scored a spectacular goal into their own net?

    Especially once people have a chance to watch and talk about the new Canadian film “Pink Ribbon Inc.”

    But, hey if the rightwingers really want to keep making a big fuss about this, when plain common sense might lead ‘em to STFU— then all I can say is, God bless 'em—- long may they keep flogging this dead, smelly horse!

  35. 35.

    gelfling545

    February 6, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @Soonergrunt: No, actually they didn’t exactly “fight back” or attack. I’m on PP’s mailing list and the first thing I got from them was a “Thanks to all our supporters who are speaking up for us” email.

  36. 36.

    Nutella

    February 6, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    Komen’s position sounds familiar: We are stunningly incompetent even though we’re paid hefty professional salaries and therefore everything bad that happens to us is someone else’s fault. Because competence is too much to demand of us.

    This Wapo article has the reporter bending herself into a pretzel trying to justify the rightwing claim that the press wasn’t fair to Komen. One simple difference she saw: In a huge public controversy and PR nightmare, Komen didn’t return calls from the press and PP did. That’s amazingly incompetent.

    Also incompetent is Komen’s multiple contradictory claims for the reason they defunded the PP grants. That’s about all they did say for several days and the contradictions made it obvious they were lying.

    Komen doesn’t do any research or health care directly. All they do is collect money and spend less than half of it funding the people who actually do research and health care. Their management’s only responsibility is marketing and PR and they are so bad at it.

  37. 37.

    Humanities Grad

    February 6, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    @ Redshift

    Are you maybe thinking about the companies that pulled their ad funding for the _American Muslims_ TV series?

  38. 38.

    gene108

    February 6, 2012 at 1:12 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    People lining up outside a Planned Parenthood office or some other OB/GYN’s office screaming their heads off about abortions to try and intimidate potential customers floats the Right’s boat.

    It doesn’t turn off people, who are inclined to be against abortion anyway.

    The same with the shouting and screaming from the Tea Party in August 2009.

    If you’re going to make this fight a broader fight about reproductive rights, such as birth control, and women’s health in general, I don’t think those tactics are going win people over.

    Bombing an abortion clinic and/or murdering doctors doesn’t reduce support from the anti-abortion side.

    Bombing SGK’s office would probably be a turn-off to potential supporters, same with people bullying people outside SGK offices, the way the anti-abortion folks have done for decades outside PP and OB/GYN offices.

    I honestly have no idea how to build on this and really beat back the right-wingers, who want to make sex only about popping out babies (for women, at least), but I don’t think we’re going to succeed by matching the nastiness on the Right.

    The people we want to get interested wouldn’t respond to it.

  39. 39.

    Redshift

    February 6, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    @Humanities Grad: Yeah, that was it! Thanks.

  40. 40.

    JGabriel

    February 6, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    Going by the photograph accompanying the HuffPo story on Komen, that Karen Handel will be played in the movie version by Rosie O’Donnell.

    .

  41. 41.

    Dr.BDH

    February 6, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    Well, I found out about this, and followed the breaking story, and sent money to PP in Karen Handel’s name, through TBogg over at FDL. So obviously, this was a DFH plot cooked up by PP and Jane Hamsher, with help from George Soros and Saul Alinsky’s reanimated corpse. Also, ACORN.

  42. 42.

    dmbeaster

    February 6, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    PP did fight back resourcefully, as noted above, but it was not hard for them to do so on simple clean terms. The story is about a cancer charity deciding to put anti-abortion ahead of its cancer fighting mission. The big mistake right out of the box by Komen was its phony “investigations” criteria for defunding, rather than admitting to an anti-abortion agenda. It is hard to defend yourself when you are obviously lying right out of the box.

    The other point is that despite the right wing crap to the contrary, a majority in this country support choice, and clearly do not support destroying PP because of abortion. Komen put itself in the awkward position of having to defend that position, and having to do so by sacrificing its core cancer fighting mission in order to support anti-abortion forces re PP.

    I would posit the following. Handel was able to sell the right wing agenda re abortion to Komen by selling it internally as simply a change in grant criteria based on “investigations”. That did not fool some Komen people, who complained and one of whom promptly resigned. The others stupidly did not anticipate the backlash, or wrongly believed that the fig leaf would work.

    And ironically, Handel was probably successful internally at Komen in part because it was the right wing thugs chasing PP that made it a political hot potato, and enabled Handel to persuade risk averse people at Komen to distance itself from PP based on the “investigations” criteria. That dishonest posture sowed the seeds for disaster, and made pushback by PP easy. Nothing but “fail” in every aspect of the Handel strategy at Komen.

  43. 43.

    Another Halocene Human

    February 6, 2012 at 1:23 pm

    Bombing an abortion clinic and/or murdering doctors doesn’t reduce support from the anti-abortion side.

    Don’t be so sure of that.

  44. 44.

    artem1s

    February 6, 2012 at 1:23 pm

    @Midnight Marauder:

    I don’t really mind if people come away with the impression that fucking with Planned Parenthood results in the deployment of a “fine-tuned political team” that “has experience in these high-pitched, high-stakes debates.

    ”

    ditto. PP has been forced to become well versed in how to mobilize their constituents because they have been under attack for the last 20 years or so. they have learned that the best offense and defense is to serve their communities well and keep them educated and updated on issues that are important to their constituents. In other words PP knows its not about them, their bottom line or their branding. Oh, they aren’t mean bullies either, looking for a fight.

  45. 45.

    jnfr

    February 6, 2012 at 1:26 pm

    And see this polling from DKos/PPP:

    Daily Kos/PPP survey: Damage done to Komen brand

  46. 46.

    SectarianSofa

    February 6, 2012 at 1:31 pm

    @Dr.BDH:
    Plot? Only scratching the surface.
    Alien UFO pimps from the Dark Side, just trying to get Mexican drugs across the border so that the abortionists can seduce and coerce the Standard White Christians into buying their sexy paraphanelia (bras, and gay sex stuff!) and lies. Then they fund the anti-gun gun lobby, and clone more of Satan’s abortion doctors. Clear as the nose on my face.

  47. 47.

    Angela

    February 6, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    @jnfr: Seems like including that information when I re-write to corporate sponsors might be helpful.

  48. 48.

    pseudonymous in nc

    February 6, 2012 at 1:36 pm

    Dear wingnuts: if you dislike Planned Parenthood’s ability to do rapid-response, stop bombing their clinics.

  49. 49.

    Mino

    February 6, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    If Komen loses funding from libs, they are done. Among conservatives, 51% disapprove of cancer screening through PP for low income women.

  50. 50.

    schrodinger's cat

    February 6, 2012 at 2:00 pm

    @gene108:

    Bombing an abortion clinic and/or murdering doctors doesn’t reduce support from the anti-abortion side. Bombing SGK’s office would probably be a turn-off to potential supporters, same with people bullying people outside SGK offices, the way the anti-abortion folks have done for decades outside PP and OB/GYN offices

    What does this even mean? Who said anything about bombs. We have to relentless and organized and not become complacent because of this win. That’s all I meant.

  51. 51.

    FlipYrWhig

    February 6, 2012 at 2:08 pm

    I think I said this before, but IMHO Komen had a pretty good strategy for dealing with the matter of how to address right-to-lifers’ objections to funding Planned Parenthood. They just COMPLETELY misjudged the prevalence of that complaint in the general population.

  52. 52.

    Commenting at Balloon Juice since 1937

    February 6, 2012 at 2:32 pm

    They’re always the victims.

  53. 53.

    Rosalita

    February 6, 2012 at 2:32 pm

    I don’t care if heads roll at Komen. Let them watch their donations drop if they continue to do this. Based on their statement, funding for PP is hardly guaranteed next time around, they are “eligible” to apply for it.

  54. 54.

    LongHairedWeirdo

    February 6, 2012 at 2:33 pm

    As long as SGK can delude itself into thinking that they were mau-mau’ed by a very effective Planned Parenthood, they will continue this behavior, as will any other organization that learns that particular “lesson.”

    Yeah, because with an “anonymous source” spreading the story, you know that it was *true*, and not just, you know, a planted story where the Komen foundation wants people to think that they believe they were sandbagged by Planned Parenthood. I mean, it’s not like that story hasn’t been winging around the rightwinger blogs for a few days.

    Folks, I’m sorry, but please, let’s have a little proper cynicism here? We get to make whatsername a brave little toaster, standing up to everyone wishing she would resign, and we’ve got the big old meanie-poopieheads Planned Parenthood being so vicious and we have an anonymous source bringing up the issue of abortion, to keep the idea in the news. Oh, yes, and they’ve received threats of violence! You see how unstable “those people” who support Planned Parenthood are?

  55. 55.

    Bnad

    February 6, 2012 at 2:46 pm

    @shortstop: Komen’s misstep is an inevitable result of the contraction of conservative belief and discussion into an insular paranoid band. “What do you mean, people out there don’t also think Planned Parenthood is the devil! Everyone I talk to does! This must be a PP astroturf operation!”

  56. 56.

    Roger Moore

    February 6, 2012 at 2:53 pm

    Shorter right wing whiners:

    It isn’t fair when the other guy can fight back! Why aren’t our victim’s arms aren’t being held behind their back by our friends in the media?

  57. 57.

    Roger Moore

    February 6, 2012 at 2:59 pm

    @Soonergrunt:

    But whatever PP did, it was very low key, or at least it seemed that way.

    They sent out press releases, tweets, and emails to their supporters telling their side of the story. This is the rough equivalent of PZ Myers mentioning an on-line poll dealing with atheism. They don’t really need to tell anyone what to do beyond that, because their listeners get the point.

  58. 58.

    Roger Moore

    February 6, 2012 at 3:13 pm

    @Redshift:

    In addition to the usual crap, there’s a relatively new tactic here, “we just want to avoid politics, so we’re doing what conservatives want.”

    This is a major strategy of the right wing: bullying people into taking their side with the threat of a major PR shitstorm. If the left doesn’t have an equivalent ability to create PR problems, it looks as if taking the right’s side is avoiding politics while taking the left’s side is courting them. If we want to solve the problem, we have to get to be as good at pushing back as they are at pushing forward, so people know they can’t save themselves from a PR nightmare by backing down. More positively, you can see that as us defending them from right wing attacks, but it works out about the same either way.

  59. 59.

    shortstop

    February 6, 2012 at 3:27 pm

    @Roger Moore:

    They don’t really need to tell anyone what to do beyond that, because their listeners get the point.</blockquote

    And could it be that PP supporters tend to be more intelligent, more activist and better versed in women's health issues than the anti-choice brigade? Not only did it take the latter a couple of days to really get going with their "Thank you for not funding baby killers! I can now pretend your PP grants were the only thing keeping me from supporting you even though I've actually never donated to a health cause of any sort before!" form commentary; not one of them had the faintest idea what to say when challenged on the "science" behind the "link between breast cancer and abortion" or reminded that ALL OB/GYNs, not just PP, make referrals for mammos rather than doing it in their own offices. And informed PP supporters were pushing back on all of that at every opportunity.

  60. 60.

    slag

    February 6, 2012 at 3:37 pm

    @Redshift:

    In addition to the usual crap, there’s a relatively new tactic here, “we just want to avoid politics, so we’re doing what conservatives want.”

    Needs to be highlighted. I think this is a big part of what we’re dealing with. It’s how defunding PBS becomes “avoiding politics”. It’s how replacing government with private entities becomes “avoiding politics”. There’s no such thing as “avoiding politics” unless you avoid people altogether.

  61. 61.

    Pongo

    February 6, 2012 at 4:08 pm

    I’m just fillin’ out forms for matching grants at the nonprofit I founded and continue to work for and thought it might be of interest to people ‘outside the industry’ to know what big matching fund donors like Google require of 501c3 orgs to whom they make grants. Google requires a signed affidavit that the grantee organization will only use the funds to ‘support the primary objective’ (read: official mission) of the organization, and ‘furthermore, this organization will not discriminate against any person or group on the basis of age, political affiliation, race, national origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, sexual orientation or religious belief.”

    Komen no doubt signed hundreds of these, all the while being out of compliance with the legal requirements for their 501c3 status. It’s not the ‘personal choice’ of a ‘private organization’ to break the law. As Karen Handel might say ‘cry me a freaking river.’

  62. 62.

    Rathskeller

    February 6, 2012 at 7:28 pm

    @Brachiator: most charities would be non-profit, no? The alternative seems silly.

    Here’s a 2010 study of CEO salary (using only 2008 data, hmm). The link goes to a 228 page PDF.

    Take aways:
    – They looked at 3000 charities
    – Median salary just under 150K
    – That didn’t vary significantly by type of organization
    – 14 charities paid their CEO more than a million
    – 106 charities paid them between 0.5 and 1 million, matching Komen.

    As far as I’m concerned, the best reason to continue to be against Komen isn’t abortion rights issue, but the commonplace observation that they’re not very good at their stated goal. They make money by helping companies (and consumers) feel good about themselves, then they very inefficiently dribble the money around, paying their CEO a large multiple of what other charity CEOs make.

    Sure hope FYWP doesn’t mess up the formatting of this comment.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. The Mahablog » Komen for the Fail: Post Mortem says:
    February 6, 2012 at 4:38 pm

    […] no doubt considers herself to be the innocent victim of left-wing terrorism. Soonergrunt writes, As long as SGK can delude itself into thinking that they were mau-mau’ed by a very effective […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Adam L Silverman on War for Ukraine Day 459: (Some of) You Have Questions, I (May) Have Answers (May 28, 2023 @ 9:03pm)
  • Anonymous At Work on War for Ukraine Day 459: (Some of) You Have Questions, I (May) Have Answers (May 28, 2023 @ 9:03pm)
  • Sure Lurkalot on Medium Cool – Vacations! (May 28, 2023 @ 9:02pm)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 459: (Some of) You Have Questions, I (May) Have Answers (May 28, 2023 @ 9:00pm)
  • mvr on Sunday Afternoon Open Thread (May 28, 2023 @ 8:58pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!