• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

After roe, women are no longer free.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

“woke” is the new caravan.

This fight is for everything.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

I was promised a recession.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

I really should read my own blog.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2012 / Vicar in a Tutu

Vicar in a Tutu

by John Cole|  February 17, 20126:09 pm| 93 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012, Republican Stupidity, Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail

Speaking of freakish religious nut Rick Santorum, via Ed Kilgore, this 2008 frothy outburst from little Ricky:

[O]nce the colleges fell and those who were being educated in our institutions, the next was the church. Now you’d say, ‘wait, the Catholic Church’? No. We all know that this country was founded on a Judeo-Christian ethic but the Judeo-Christian ethic was a Protestant Judeo-Christian ethic, sure the Catholics had some influence, but this was a Protestant country and the Protestant ethic, mainstream, mainline Protestantism, and of course we look at the shape of mainline Protestantism in this country and it is in shambles, it is gone from the world of Christianity as I see it.

With Santorum, it’s Opus Dei or the highway.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Paint a Vulgar Picture
Next Post: BigMouth Strikes Again »

Reader Interactions

93Comments

  1. 1.

    BGinCHI

    February 17, 2012 at 6:14 pm

    Once the colleges fell?

    I’m looking out the window of my office and I don’t see any signs of carnage or flames or barricades.

    Does he think American universities were founded on teaching religious ideas or doctrine? Does he know how anything in this country works?

  2. 2.

    cathyx

    February 17, 2012 at 6:17 pm

    @BGinCHI: He means fell in the sense that they are now liberal bastions of drugs, sex and rock and roll.

  3. 3.

    Comrade Mary

    February 17, 2012 at 6:17 pm

    Frankly, Mr. Cole, you’re on a roll.

  4. 4.

    dslak

    February 17, 2012 at 6:18 pm

    @BGinCHI:

    Does he think American universities were founded on teaching religious ideas or doctrine?

    The first few were.

  5. 5.

    Nancy

    February 17, 2012 at 6:18 pm

    @BGinCHI: Actually, Harvard was founded for the purpose of training Congregational and Unitarian clergy.

  6. 6.

    Villago Delenda Est

    February 17, 2012 at 6:18 pm

    We all know that this country was founded on a Judeo-Christian ethic but the Judeo-Christian ethic was a Protestant Judeo-Christian ethic

    OK, kill the Judeo- part. That’s post WWII guilt trip addition because of the late unpleasantness in Germany and Poland, for the most part.

    Secondly, while one could argue that the tradition is culturally Protestant, you can’t argue that a bunch of deists who specifically excluded any religious test from being applied to holding any office or position of trust in the new republic was religiously Protestant.

    Then again, on the other hand, Santorum is simply a, well, santorum-head.

  7. 7.

    Anoniminous

    February 17, 2012 at 6:19 pm

    @BGinCHI:

    Actually …

    Some of the original US universities were founded to teach religious ideas and doctrines: Harvard, Yale, Dartmouth, fer instances.

    ETA: Nancy broke the tape first but I win because of the greater amount of evidence.

    (So there! nyah.)

  8. 8.

    dmsilev

    February 17, 2012 at 6:20 pm

    @BGinCHI:

    I’m looking out the window of my office and I don’t see any signs of carnage or flames or barricades.

    Wait until your team wins $IMPORTANT_SPORTING_EVENT. That will usually do the trick.

    (some years back, I interviewed for a postdoc position at the University of Minnesota. My hosts took me on a short tour of the neighborhood around campus, including “here’s where the students rioted after winning the hockey championship”. Whee….)

  9. 9.

    David Koch

    February 17, 2012 at 6:20 pm

    To quote, Ed Koch, not one Jew will vote for Senator Man on Dog.

  10. 10.

    Ed Dane defender of Doughnuts

    February 17, 2012 at 6:21 pm

    I seem to recall Rick Santorum giving a speech on Muslim/Arab relations once, one decried by many outside of the GOP echelon.

    Check that … there’s a lot apparently. Might be something to consider repeating since he is the flavor of the month.

  11. 11.

    Svensker

    February 17, 2012 at 6:21 pm

    If you read the whole thing, he says that Satan has taken control of academia and mainline Protestant churches. And as I said in another thread, I want a journalist to ask him specifically which mainline Protestant churches he thinks have been taken over by Satan. The Presbyterians? The Lutherans? The Methodists? I think their congregations would be interested.

  12. 12.

    Comrade Dread

    February 17, 2012 at 6:23 pm

    Awesome. I had no idea he was a fundamentalist Catholic that rejected all that accommodation with Protestants.

    Wonder how his Evangelical supporters will feel about him since he thinks all of us non-Catholic Christians are bound for hellfire, no doubt to burn on the same circle as Luther and Calvin.

  13. 13.

    JimTheNewb

    February 17, 2012 at 6:23 pm

    I’m very much enjoying the latest crop of post titles.

  14. 14.

    Brachiator

    February 17, 2012 at 6:25 pm

    With Santorum, it’s Opus Dei or the highway.

    It’s cool wordplay day.

    @Svensker:

    If you read the whole thing, he says that Satan has taken control of academia and mainline Protestant churches.

    I can’t wait for the movie version of this fantasy.

  15. 15.

    Jimbo316

    February 17, 2012 at 6:25 pm

    It is true that many early colleges were founded as religious-affiliated institutions or even as theological schools but that changed about 150-200 years ago for most of them (though not Catholic colleges), never mind the thousands of institutions that were never religiously affiliated in the first place. We are in the midst of Republican sheer madness and viciousness. It’s mark of a mortally-wounded wildebeest thrashing about wildly.

  16. 16.

    Sly

    February 17, 2012 at 6:26 pm

    We all know that this country was founded on a Judeo-Christian ethic but the Judeo-Christian ethic was a Protestant Judeo-Christian ethic

    …

    What?

    Cotton Mather and Moses Maimonedes form the historical basis of Colonial American ethics?

    Fuckin’ seriously?

  17. 17.

    lonesomerobot

    February 17, 2012 at 6:27 pm

    Hey John, why doncha post another picture.
    You handsome devil.

  18. 18.

    Benjamin Franklin

    February 17, 2012 at 6:27 pm

    Santorum: ‘Take back that Papal Bull, you Sodomites.”

  19. 19.

    lonesomerobot

    February 17, 2012 at 6:29 pm

    @Comrade Mary: I didn’t realize you wrote such bloody awful poetry

  20. 20.

    Martin

    February 17, 2012 at 6:30 pm

    @Comrade Dread:

    Wonder how his Evangelical supporters will feel about him since he thinks all of us non-Catholic Christians are bound for hellfire, no doubt to burn on the same circle as Luther and Calvin.

    Shh. Don’t tell them until he’s nominated. More fun that way.

  21. 21.

    JPL

    February 17, 2012 at 6:31 pm

    The debate Wednesday night should be a hoot. A Mormon and a newly converted thrice married Catholic attacking Santorum for his views on mainline Protestants. Good times!

  22. 22.

    gnomedad

    February 17, 2012 at 6:31 pm

    With Santorum, it’s Opus Dei or the highwei.

    Couldn’t resist.

  23. 23.

    gnomedad

    February 17, 2012 at 6:32 pm

    @lonesomerobot:
    She’s a poet and didn’t noet.

  24. 24.

    Comrade Mary

    February 17, 2012 at 6:33 pm

    With Santorum, it’s Opus Dei or the highway.

    Missed that the first time. Utter fucking win.

  25. 25.

    gex

    February 17, 2012 at 6:35 pm

    @Comrade Dread: There’s a “gentleman’s” agreement amongst the Christian denominations to pretend they have no differences as they fight off the evil feminist, gay, atheist, Muslim, secular meance. So they can bite the bullet and vote for him now, and the battle for Christian denomination supremacy can come later.

    @gnomedad: No more rhyming, and I mean it…

  26. 26.

    harlana

    February 17, 2012 at 6:37 pm

    @Comrade Dread: Evangelicals are different than what he calls “mainline” Protestants – there’s a difference there since they don’t associate themselves with mainstream Protestants (he doesn’t want to use that word so he uses “mainline” which is really fucking stupid, anyway), which is what i think he is implying, is all i’m saying. Evangelicals don’t like those people either and think they are ungodly, just like Rick does. But i thought most of them hate Catholics anyway.

  27. 27.

    scav

    February 17, 2012 at 6:40 pm

    Now I’m seeing him on an interstate, surrounded by cartoon penguins, some of them wearing tutus. Given that I’ve been tormented by visions of the Perils of Pauline as rescued by the Keystone Kops vibe from the Repub primary today, I’m sensing a theme. Roadkill.

  28. 28.

    noodler

    February 17, 2012 at 6:40 pm

    “but the Judeo-Christian ethic was a Protestant Judeo-Christian ethic”

    Did Martin Luther nail his Theses to a synagogue door too?

  29. 29.

    Delia

    February 17, 2012 at 6:41 pm

    See, I’ve always thought the fundie embrace of the RC’s was a bit shaky to begin with. They only all agreed to it so they could wage the culture wars on the evil secularists and the mainline Prots who are just as bad in their eyes. But the fundies have always thought that this is really their country all along and they were only being nice by letting the Catholics come along for the ride and not calling them the Whore of Babylon anymore. Now here comes Little Ricky, blowing the lid off the pot and revealing that the true RC’s have always thought that the fundies are just like all the other Prots, heretical sinners who strayed from the true path and are bound for hell.

    So what does that do to this nice alliance between the various religious types that was the foundation of the social cons? Why, just yesterday we had all the rabbis, preachers, and bishops lined up and yammering to Congress about how birth control violates their religious freedom. Now Little Ricky’s told two-thirds of them to f##k off.

  30. 30.

    BGinCHI

    February 17, 2012 at 6:42 pm

    @Anoniminous: Yeah gang, I know that, and I should have said “state schools.” By far the largest educator of people in higher ed for a long, long time.

    Why do Santorum and other religious dicks hate the founding fathers? Separation of church and state, bitches.

  31. 31.

    makewi

    February 17, 2012 at 6:43 pm

    Santorum is wrong. You guys aren’t Satan. Just devoid of any morals or ethics. There’s a difference.

  32. 32.

    Comrade Dread

    February 17, 2012 at 6:44 pm

    @Jimbo316: I don’t know, on the one hand, it does seem like there was a lot more public general acceptance of an American Christianity back in the day.

    On the other hand, it’s really hard to argue that we’ve moved away from that given that we have Christian music, Christian movies, Christian books, the National Day of Prayer, public professions of faith by politicians, athletes, and celebrities, and general embrace of at least a national form of Christianity by the American public.

    But I suppose when right leaning folks talk about how we’ve moved away from our Christian heritage, they’re mostly complaining that some atheists won’t let them put up a Ten Commandments display on public property or about kids these days, so I should probably stop trying to analyze it and just accept it as political rhetoric.

  33. 33.

    Villago Delenda Est

    February 17, 2012 at 6:45 pm

    @makewi:

    Yeah, right, lying sack of santorum.

  34. 34.

    Comrade Dread

    February 17, 2012 at 6:46 pm

    @harlana: That’s not quite true. Baptists are considered mainline Protestants and they’re almost (if not more) socially conservative than Catholics.

  35. 35.

    scav

    February 17, 2012 at 6:48 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: poor creatorofverbalwee is just upholding the honor of the side that has to bribed into being good by buying greenstamps into Heaven(tm) using other people’s bodies while excusing all moral failings of their own because they’re forgiven(TM) by Jesus(TM) and their wives and choirboys.

  36. 36.

    gex

    February 17, 2012 at 6:51 pm

    @Comrade Dread: I still think there’s plenty of public acceptance of Christianity. The fight is that the public doesn’t want it imposed, and the Christians of this ilk hate that. The more they attack me, the less tolerant I get about Christianity. If they don’t like it they can back the fuck off.

  37. 37.

    kindness

    February 17, 2012 at 6:51 pm

    I saw that post. Yea I liked the part about Sanitorum linking Protestants with Satan.

    God-botherers. They suck.

  38. 38.

    makewi

    February 17, 2012 at 6:55 pm

    @scav:

    It’s easier not to have any standards other than the left is always right isn’t it? It’s just how you all roll. That’s how you end up with serial womanizers held up as standard bearers for upholding woman’s rights.

  39. 39.

    harlana

    February 17, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    @Comrade Dread: Baptists are becoming increasingly fundie/evangelical, they break off from their mother churches all the time, is all i’m saying. i don’t think they are any more friendly towards Catholics than what ever a “mainline” Baptist is these days (that’s like trying to find a “moderate” Republican) and Ricky, he’s trying to appeal to the megachurch crowd, just imo. (he should, they have lots of $$)

  40. 40.

    scav

    February 17, 2012 at 7:00 pm

    @makewi: stings a little, your side being unable to be good for the sake of being good but only doing it because the big daddy bribes you with holy cookies, doesn’t it?

    ETA: and take those holy cookies from the hands of the serial pederasts.

  41. 41.

    Chyron HR

    February 17, 2012 at 7:02 pm

    @makewi:

    It kills you to know that you can’t accuse an uppity “knicker” of raping you and get him strung up with no questions asked anymore, doesn’t it?

  42. 42.

    jl

    February 17, 2012 at 7:08 pm

    Is Rih confused, or what?

    He is trying to appeal to founders for the supposed secatrian religious moral foundations of the country (which I think is historically false).

    Then he says he does not like the direction this ‘mainline’ Prot Judeo Christian sectarian worldview has taken over the last 50 (or is it 100) years, so he says to hell with it.

    Or is he saying that he knows that the founders really advocated his reactionary religious sect?

  43. 43.

    makewi

    February 17, 2012 at 7:11 pm

    @scav:

    As it happens, I’m good because I love my fellow man. I think perhaps you should take the cookies, or give them to Chryon HR who seems to think rape victims are all liars.

  44. 44.

    Davis X. Machina

    February 17, 2012 at 7:13 pm

    How can Clement of Alexandria run for president? He’s not even a citizen.

  45. 45.

    scav

    February 17, 2012 at 7:16 pm

    @makewi: I’ve seen no evidence whatsoever of you loving your fellow man, let alone your fellow humans from your behavior on this site. Pretty must constant bile and yes, wee. And oh yes, I will take a leftist womanizer as a champion for women’s rights as at least he’s more likely to have interacted with them as actual people rather than doormats to be left for trophy wives when convenient and dragged up on stage to assent to her forgiveness of him when he adopts a wide diapered stance in airport men’s rooms.

  46. 46.

    Svensker

    February 17, 2012 at 7:17 pm

    @jl:

    Or is he saying that he knows that the founders really advocated his reactionary religious sect?

    I think he’s saying the founders were an OK version of “judeo-christian protestanism” but then Satan got busy and took over the schools and then took over the “mainline Protestants” (i.e., not the fundies), so now, good God awmighty, everbody but the Catholics and the fundies have Satan cooties all over theyselves.

    ETA: I don’t know whether teh Jooz have Satan cooties or not. Prolly the lefty ones do, the arch-zionists don’t.

  47. 47.

    jimmiraybob

    February 17, 2012 at 7:22 pm

    Once burning at the stake was stolen from the Church by the liberals, the universities were doomed. Doomed I tells ya.

    I blame it on the Byzantine end run of ancient knowledge into Florence and other medieval satanic ports-o-call.

  48. 48.

    PurpleGirl

    February 17, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    @Svensker: Well, at least the members of the Evangelical Lutherna Church in America (of ELCA) are seen as heretics by the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod. (the Evangelical in ELCA’s name refers to their beliefs is spreading the good word of the Bible. They may do outreach but they aren’t crazies. Dr. Tiller was an ELCA Lutheran btw.

  49. 49.

    jl

    February 17, 2012 at 7:24 pm

    @Svensker: Thanks. We’ve all read about how worried the Founders were about Satan? That is why they burned witches and pressed warlocks to death.

    The threat of Satanic conquest was subject the famous warning of President Cotton Mather’s farewell address.

    Or, did I get things confused?

  50. 50.

    Svensker

    February 17, 2012 at 7:26 pm

    @jl:

    :)

  51. 51.

    Benjamin Franklin

    February 17, 2012 at 7:26 pm

    This is gonna leave a mark…..

    Obama Administration Asks Supreme Court to Dismiss ACLU Challenge to Warrantless Wiretapping Law

    http://www.aclu.org/national-security/obama-administration-asks-supreme-court-dismiss-aclu-challenge-warrantless

  52. 52.

    makewi

    February 17, 2012 at 7:27 pm

    I will take a leftist womanizer as a champion for women’s rights as at least he’s more likely to have interacted with them as actual people rather than doormats to be left for trophy wives

    Your words are beautiful man.

  53. 53.

    Ken

    February 17, 2012 at 7:33 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: OK, kill the Judeo- part.

    If you haven’t already seen it, Google “santorum hannukah”.

    And who was the comedian that said “when they say Judeo-Christian they really mean Christian”? It might have been one of Jon Stewart’s regulars.

  54. 54.

    Suffern ACE

    February 17, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    @purplegirl-they’re LCMS. The core belief is that everyone is a heretic.

  55. 55.

    Smiling Mortician

    February 17, 2012 at 7:40 pm

    @scav:
    Just wanna go on record as saying that the word “womanizer” should be stricken from . . . well, from everything. Aside from the inherent irony of coining a term that objectifies women in order to pejoratively describe a man who objectifies women, it also makes no logical sense — a rational definition of such a word would be “to turn into a woman.”

    Some people are squicked out by words like “moist” or “panties.” For me, that word is “womanizer.” Ick.

  56. 56.

    Villago Delenda Est

    February 17, 2012 at 7:40 pm

    @Ken:

    The stupid. It burns!

  57. 57.

    JoyfulA

    February 17, 2012 at 7:43 pm

    @Comrade Dread: There are multiple sorts of Baptists. American Baptists (northern) are mainstream; Southern Baptists aren’t, IMHO, at least since the nutjob takeover c. 25 years ago.

  58. 58.

    James King

    February 17, 2012 at 7:43 pm

    @Davis X. Machina

    Obscure patristics references don’t come up often enough in blog comments. I salute you.

  59. 59.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 17, 2012 at 7:47 pm

    @Smiling Mortician:
    The point of womanizer seems to be that those womans don’t like to do it, they’re somehow coerced. I guess.

  60. 60.

    Nancy

    February 17, 2012 at 7:47 pm

    There is only one hope for the republican party. They must all take a vow of silence. A female legislator in New Hampshire says married people could practice abstinence if they don’t want to get pregnant.

  61. 61.

    HelpThe99ers

    February 17, 2012 at 7:48 pm

    @gex: it’s inconceivable that no one has asked if anybody wants a peanut.

  62. 62.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 17, 2012 at 7:50 pm

    I really cannot tell you how happy I am to see GOP political religious warfare breaking out. (as a doggedly non-religious sort)

    I suppose one of the real benefits of being an agnostic will be to get to stand off to the side and point and laugh.

  63. 63.

    Villago Delenda Est

    February 17, 2012 at 7:51 pm

    @Nancy:

    That isn’t the same legislator who said the pill causes prostate cancer, is it?

  64. 64.

    Felinious Wench

    February 17, 2012 at 7:52 pm

    Hate to tell Rick this, but the Episcopalians are still around, thank you…and most of us REALLY think he’s an idiot. There are fewer of us, but that doesn’t mean we’re gone. Much to the fundamentalist’s dismay, Damn Whiskeypalians, electing gay bishops and giving real Christians bad names…

  65. 65.

    Benjamin Franklin

    February 17, 2012 at 7:53 pm

    @Chuck Butcher:

    Since ‘agnostic’ basically means ‘don’t know’, it may be a joke on yourself.

  66. 66.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 17, 2012 at 7:58 pm

    @Felinious Wench:

    but the Episcopalians are still around

    Hmmm, out here in the “RED” hinterlands the Episcopalian is one of the bigger churches. They even rent (for a very modest sum) space to the Democratic county party.

  67. 67.

    Amanda in the South Bay

    February 17, 2012 at 8:00 pm

    How is he wrong though? Protestantism has profoundly shaped this country, a few years of founding father deism aside. I mean, even most American Catholics speak in terms of Protestantism. I really don’t see how that is historically inaccurate. The 13 colonies had no significant numbers of Catholics, the kind of Anglicanism practiced was very latitudinarian, and there was never a real established aristocracy (of the Loyalist/English Civil War sort) and I don’t think most Americans have ever gotten into their minds what an episcopate is.

    Sure, Santorum is a nasty fucker, but still, I don’t think he’s at all inaccurate. The ethos of Protestant Christianity infects even Catholicism and Orthodoxy to large degrees in American (says the ex-Orthodox and at one time ex-Byzantine Catholic).

  68. 68.

    mdblanche

    February 17, 2012 at 8:03 pm

    @Nancy: Harvard was founded for the purpose of training Puritan clergy. Technically a Congregationalist is a mellow Puritan and a Unitarian is a really mellow Puritan.

    If they were around today, the founders of Harvard would agree their college has been subverted but they would blame the Founding Fathers. Which is why none of this is going to hurt Santorum. Potential Santorum voters either agree with him, which would include evangelicals, or they’re already staying where they’re not wanted, so why should these remarks make any difference?

  69. 69.

    Smiling Mortician

    February 17, 2012 at 8:06 pm

    @Chuck Butcher:
    Pretty sure there was a word for that already.

    But yeah, I think that’s about right: they’re coerced, but not, y’know, coerced coerced. They’ve been womanized! Now I get it. A man who is a womanizer is a man who makes a woman into a woman by the sheer power of his relentless manhood.

    This is not reducing my squick level . . .

  70. 70.

    Felinious Wench

    February 17, 2012 at 8:08 pm

    Hmmm, out here in the “RED” hinterlands the Episcopalian is one of the bigger churches.

    We iz in ur Catholicism, messing with ur dogma.

  71. 71.

    Brachiator

    February 17, 2012 at 8:15 pm

    @mdblanche:

    If they were around today, the founders of Harvard would agree their college has been subverted but they would blame the Founding Fathers.

    Let’s see. Harvard was founded in 1636. If they were around today, the founders of Harvard would consider themselves to be loyal subjects of the British Empire. And looking for the Tardis and a certain Doctor to help them get back to their own time.

  72. 72.

    Benjamin Franklin

    February 17, 2012 at 8:20 pm

    @Brachiator:

    And looking for the Tardis and a certain Doctor to help them get back to their own time.

    Dr Gonzo?

  73. 73.

    Delia

    February 17, 2012 at 8:21 pm

    @Felinious Wench:

    Damn Whiskeypalians, electing gay bishops and giving real Christians bad names…

    Whaddya mean “giving real Christians a bad name”? We ARE the real Christians. The loonies are giving us a bad name.

  74. 74.

    scav

    February 17, 2012 at 8:23 pm

    @Smiling Mortician: I’ll find the dictionary page and strike it. Was just repeating it, don’t think it plays in my usual vocab so won’t miss it. Philanderer, how’s that one?

  75. 75.

    mdblanche

    February 17, 2012 at 8:29 pm

    @Brachiator: Subjects of the British empire yes, but loyal? The Church of England is further from the one true faith than ever! At least attendance is no longer mandatory, but attendance should be mandatory once the church has been sufficiently purified.

    And a structure that’s bigger on the inside than it is on the outside? This doctor you speak of must be a WITCH!1!!

  76. 76.

    Felinious Wench

    February 17, 2012 at 8:34 pm

    Whaddya mean “giving real Christians a bad name”? We ARE the real Christians. The loonies are giving us a bad name.

    My Fundie relatives say I’m not a real Christian because I don’t believe in hell. My great aunt said I’m illegitimate because my parents didn’t marry in the Catholic church, and i’m going to hell because i wasn’t baptised into the one true church. So, hey, according to all of the people above, I’m going to burn,burn,burn.

    You can see how much it’s had an effect on me…

  77. 77.

    Felinious Wench

    February 17, 2012 at 8:34 pm

    Whaddya mean “giving real Christians a bad name”? We ARE the real Christians. The loonies are giving us a bad name.

    My Fundie relatives say I’m not a real Christian because I don’t believe in hell. My great aunt said I’m illegitimate because my parents didn’t marry in the Catholic church, and i’m going to hell because i wasn’t baptised into the one true church. So, hey, according to all of the people above, I’m going to burn,burn,burn.

    You can see how much it’s had an effect on me…

  78. 78.

    Jager

    February 17, 2012 at 8:36 pm

    @Comrade Dread: Since I was around back in the day. In the 50’s and 60’s growing up in the Midwest, nobody pushed religion or wore it on their sleeves, nobody asked what church you belonged to. It never came up. Nice, friendly folks all getting along without bullshit. A pal who grew up in Tulsa lived in a completely different America than I did and he says its much worse now. Fuck them all!

  79. 79.

    Smiling Mortician

    February 17, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    @scav:

    Works for me. I’d accept libertine as well, except, you know, stupid people have trouble understanding that not all words beginning with “liber” are the same.

  80. 80.

    Gin & Tonic

    February 17, 2012 at 8:40 pm

    @Benjamin Franklin: And here I thought after W left office that I’d save some money by cutting back on my ACLU donations. I guess I was wrong.

  81. 81.

    scav

    February 17, 2012 at 8:41 pm

    @Smiling Mortician: YES! libertine too, like it.

  82. 82.

    Benjamin Franklin

    February 17, 2012 at 8:43 pm

    @Gin & Tonic:

    And here, I thought I’d become the invisible man… : > )

  83. 83.

    Omnes Omnibus

    February 17, 2012 at 8:54 pm

    @Smiling Mortician: I object to libertine and philanderer being used interchangeably.

  84. 84.

    Chuck Butcher

    February 17, 2012 at 9:08 pm

    @Smiling Mortician:

    This is not reducing my squick level . . .

    I’ll have somebody work on that… delegation of authority, you know

  85. 85.

    honus

    February 17, 2012 at 9:17 pm

    @Comrade Dread: the whole thing about contraception is Catholic. The Protestants always used contraception. It was used by them to differentiate us catholics back in the day (early 60s) But then of course, most of the catholics were democrats.

  86. 86.

    Suffern ACE

    February 17, 2012 at 9:17 pm

    I don’t know if Weber would be down with this judeo-Christian work ethic concept. I think he was very specific about what he meant, and it wasn’t “rah, rah this is what makes y’all so great.”

  87. 87.

    honus

    February 17, 2012 at 9:19 pm

    @Comrade Dread: But they have always been allowed to use rubbers. And they traditionally hate catholics, because we’re, you know, dark. Italians, Greeks and Irish.

  88. 88.

    scav

    February 17, 2012 at 9:36 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: this is getting tricky. Clearly a lot of research my be needed to clear up all the vocabulary issues.

  89. 89.

    hamletta

    February 17, 2012 at 9:42 pm

    @harlana: No, “mainline Protestant” is a real thing. It refers to non-evangelical Protestants, most likely belonging to the National Council of Churches (lots of Orthodox bodies there, but they’re obvs. not Protestants).

  90. 90.

    Brother Shotgun of Sweet Reason

    February 17, 2012 at 11:18 pm

    @Amanda in the South Bay:

    The 13 colonies had no significant numbers of Catholics,

    Ahem. Maryland.

  91. 91.

    maryQ

    February 18, 2012 at 12:01 am

    Santorum just got me very interested in joining a mainlime Protestant church. It’s on, Dude.

  92. 92.

    TooManyJens

    February 18, 2012 at 1:04 am

    @maryQ: You put the mainlime in the coconut…

  93. 93.

    Amanda in the South Bay

    February 18, 2012 at 2:31 am

    @Brother Shotgun of Sweet Reason:
    emphasis on significant. Seriously, overall the numbers of Catholics in the colonies was pretty small, Maryland included. The ethos of colonial America wasn’t pre-reformation England or counter-reformation europe, it was purely Protestant.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Geminid on No Cake for Me Today Open Thread (Mar 23, 2023 @ 8:37pm)
  • Ksmiami on Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea (Mar 23, 2023 @ 8:35pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on No Cake for Me Today Open Thread (Mar 23, 2023 @ 8:34pm)
  • Brachiator on No Cake for Me Today Open Thread (Mar 23, 2023 @ 8:33pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on No Cake for Me Today Open Thread (Mar 23, 2023 @ 8:30pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!