• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Let there be snark.

Bark louder, little dog.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

I wonder if trump will be tried as an adult.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Nothing worth doing is easy.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / The Internet is for Porn and Doonesbury

The Internet is for Porn and Doonesbury

by $8 blue check mistermix|  March 12, 20129:31 am| 45 Comments

This post is in: Our Failed Media Experiment

FacebookTweetEmail

I don’t know what’s dumber: the idea that kids still read the comics pages, the notion that this week’s Doonesbury is edgy or vulgar, or the belief that putting the strip in your online edition somehow absolves a newspaper of the responsibility of “printing” it.

What I do know is that an industry that treats their online edition the way a dog treats a favorite pooping spot isn’t taking the Internet seriously and will die because of it.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Live by the Freak Out, Die by the Freak Out
Next Post: If I were a vicious campaign weasel »

Reader Interactions

45Comments

  1. 1.

    Poopyman

    March 12, 2012 at 9:34 am

    What I do know is that an industry that treats their online edition the way a dog treats a favorite pooping spot isn’t taking the Internet seriously and will die because of it.

    Feature, not a bug.

  2. 2.

    dmsilev

    March 12, 2012 at 9:36 am

    Doonesbury this week is only vulgar in the sense that it’s an accurate depiction of an incredibly vulgar situation.

    In other words, better news coverage than what you would find in the alleged “news” section of many papers.

  3. 3.

    losgatosca

    March 12, 2012 at 9:36 am

    The mission of the press is to . . . . . surely some one must know.

  4. 4.

    dr. bloor

    March 12, 2012 at 9:39 am

    What I do know is that an industry that treats their online edition the way a dog treats a favorite pooping spot isn’t taking the Internet seriously and will die because of it.

    This. The notion that my kid is more likely to open a newspaper than he’s going to stumble upon this strip on line (which is A-OK w/me, btw) is laughably naive or disingenuous. The utter absence of critical thinking skills amongst media types never ceases to amaze me.

  5. 5.

    Schlemizel

    March 12, 2012 at 9:39 am

    @dmsilev:
    BINGO!

    If Doonesbury is vulgar then they really need to call out the GOP wingnuts that are push this vulgarity in their legislation.

  6. 6.

    LittlePig

    March 12, 2012 at 9:39 am

    Ah, the ‘What About The Children?’ gambit. A classic.

    George Carlin had the right answer to that one.

  7. 7.

    Cermet

    March 12, 2012 at 9:45 am

    In the time of the overlords – also known as the entitled pricks of the 1% – the only way truth can be printed for the masses is when carefully wrapped in humor.

  8. 8.

    cathyx

    March 12, 2012 at 9:56 am

    My 13 year old never understands the Doonesbury comic when she reads it. I suspect most kids don’t. And because of that I’m not sure she bothers to read it any more. I quit reading Prince Valient when I was a kid because it was never funny.

  9. 9.

    Linda Featheringill

    March 12, 2012 at 10:02 am

    @cathyx:

    Is the Prince still around?

    I enjoyed the stories for a while but guess I outgrew that phase. Fun while it lasted, though.

    And yes, this was a few million years ago.

  10. 10.

    dmsilev

    March 12, 2012 at 10:04 am

    @Linda Featheringill: Yeah, Prince Valiant is still around. A lot of the serial comic strips are still running, albeit at fewer and fewer newspapers. Brenda Starr shut down for good a couple of years back, but that’s the only one that comes to mind in recent years. Hell, Dick Tracy just recently got an entirely new art/writing team and is actually interesting now.

  11. 11.

    cathyx

    March 12, 2012 at 10:05 am

    @Linda Featheringill: I doubt it’s still there, but my main point is that even if kids read Doonesbury, they don’t understand most of it. If they do understand it, then they’re not too young to get the message.

  12. 12.

    John M. Burt

    March 12, 2012 at 10:08 am

    Trudeau ought to have a stash of bunny strips.

  13. 13.

    Comrade Javamanphil

    March 12, 2012 at 10:08 am

    @dr. bloor: They aren’t interested in keeping the strip from the eyes of the kids. The are interested in keeping the strip from the eyes of the old people who worry a great deal about “the kids today.” Generational concern trolling is all this is.

  14. 14.

    dmsilev

    March 12, 2012 at 10:09 am

    Speaking of dying media forms, this has got to be the most pathetic headline of the week: “New Internet TV Network to Feature Larry King”.

    (Link)

  15. 15.

    Schlemizel

    March 12, 2012 at 10:11 am

    @dmsilev:
    Sadly, almost all of there dreadful old strips are still running somewhere. One thing that can make them funny is reading them at the comic curmudgeon (joshreads.com)

    She skewers them very nicely & even has a weekly comment contest.

  16. 16.

    dporpentine

    March 12, 2012 at 10:23 am

    As Comrade Javamanphil already noted: they say “kids” but they mean “old people”–i.e., the people who still get print newspapers and complain their heads off about what’s in there.

  17. 17.

    Lee

    March 12, 2012 at 10:30 am

    Obligatory

  18. 18.

    Mister Papercut

    March 12, 2012 at 10:46 am

    What I do know is that an industry that treats their online edition the way a dog treats a favorite pooping spot isn’t taking the Internet seriously and will die because of it.

    I have it! Paywalls! [/print media company execs]

  19. 19.

    Bridgier

    March 12, 2012 at 10:49 am

    @Schlemizel: Wait, Josh is a she? So confused…

  20. 20.

    Paul in KY

    March 12, 2012 at 11:01 am

    @cathyx: Do you try to explain it to her or is it just a waste of time (have to give character’s backstory, talk about issues, etc)?

  21. 21.

    SBJules

    March 12, 2012 at 11:02 am

    The L.A. Times put it on the editorial page. Old women, & I’m one are worried about the erosion of women’s rights if the Republicans win. Who do you think supports Planned Parenthood? We do.

  22. 22.

    middlewest

    March 12, 2012 at 11:02 am

    Thank god they’ve moved the strips to the obscurity of the internet. No one will find them there.

  23. 23.

    Cermet

    March 12, 2012 at 11:08 am

    Considering Tarzan is still running I guess anything can.

  24. 24.

    Terry

    March 12, 2012 at 11:12 am

    The old farts who read only print won’t see it; and won’t complain. D’oh!

  25. 25.

    Terry

    March 12, 2012 at 11:12 am

    @Comrade Javamanphil: This.

  26. 26.

    Dan

    March 12, 2012 at 11:15 am

    @Poopyman:

    I don’t follow you.

  27. 27.

    ThresherK

    March 12, 2012 at 11:19 am

    “B-b-b-but it’s online” is a wonderful affront to the people who don’t use smartphones. (And I mean smartphones! not clunky old desktops.)

    Tweak that group and we get “people who won’t spend money on a smartphone”, a nearly-invisible group in advertising or the media. I guess those papers are just trying to scrub the last few folks who’ll pay for the dead tree edition away.

  28. 28.

    Jay C

    March 12, 2012 at 11:19 am

    @Schlemizel:

    Umm, Schlemizel: the warped genius behind The Comics Curmudgeon is Josh Fruhlinger: who is, AFACBD, a guy.

    While his site (like his subject) can get a bit repetitious over months/years, it’s still worth the occasional look-in.

    But yeah, comics can live on WAY past their sell-by dates (“Gasoline Alley”, frex. was first published in 1918) Garry Trudeau, at least, makes some sort of attempt to keep his strip vaguely relevant. A few years ago, Josh F. once reprinted a page of daily comics from 1958: astonishingly, something like 40% of them were still being run….

  29. 29.

    Cris (without an H)

    March 12, 2012 at 11:22 am

    I’m please to see Doonesbury taking on this subject and not pulling any punches, but as somebody who hates Mallard Fillmore with a passion, I’m sympathetic to the “keep politics out of the comic section” attitude. (Some papers run Mallard Fillmore and Doonesbury on the editorials page, which is a perfect solution in my opinion.)

    @Schlemizel: the Comics Curmudgeon is the only thing keeping me reading daily strips. I hadn’t looked at The Family Circus or FBOW or any of those in years before Josh came along.

  30. 30.

    moonbat

    March 12, 2012 at 11:25 am

    What I find hilarious about this is that if they had just run the damn strip relatively few people would have known about it, except for those who regularly read Trudeau (I am not one of them). But now that they have gone to all the trouble of “burying” it on the internet or banning it from their pages a whole lot more people are now going to hunt it down to see what the fuss is all about. Banning something is the first step to making it go viral even in the days before the internet. Don Wildmon’s banning/boycotting of “The Last Temptation of Christ” made that movie a success.

  31. 31.

    Ken

    March 12, 2012 at 11:28 am

    @losgatosca: The mission of the press is to . . . . . surely some one must know.

    To deliver advertisements to an audience. The content is a way to attract enough of an audience to interest the advertisers. Anyone who tells you otherwise is probably also surprised by the slow and agonizing death of print newspapers.

  32. 32.

    Dan

    March 12, 2012 at 11:31 am

    @Cris (without an H):

    Mallard Filmore’s problem isn’t the politics. It’s that it’s horribly unfunny and poorly drawn. Harold Gray’s Little Orphan Annie was unapoligetically right wing, but it’s a masterpiece.

  33. 33.

    shortstop

    March 12, 2012 at 11:36 am

    @dporpentine: And constantly write snail mail letters rumbling about “canceling their subscriptions,” believing that this is a dire financial threat.

  34. 34.

    muddy

    March 12, 2012 at 11:44 am

    @Dan: They put Doonesbury in the editorial section, so they had to add Mallard Fillmore for “balance”. Sadly the quantity and quality of humor is not balanced, but then one seldom finds actual humor amongst conservatives, whether they be cartoonists, pundits or rabble.

  35. 35.

    rlrr

    March 12, 2012 at 12:09 pm

    I bet many of the papers refusing to run Doonesbury are still running the criminally unfunny Mallard Fillmore….-+

  36. 36.

    rlrr

    March 12, 2012 at 12:15 pm

    @Dan:

    Apparently somebody once put forth a convincing argument that Atlas Shrugged plagiarized a Little Orphan Annie story line.

  37. 37.

    cwlbud

    March 12, 2012 at 12:18 pm

    My 13, 11, and 9 year old kids go straight for the “funnies” whenever there’s a paper around. Mind you that’s only when we’re enjoying a weekend breakfast at a local diner or at Grandma’s. I don’t think they even have access to print media at their school library. Comics are great for pithy insight and anyone who is afraid of them has something to hide.

  38. 38.

    cwlbud

    March 12, 2012 at 12:18 pm

    My 13, 11, and 9 year old kids go straight for the “funnies” whenever there’s a paper around. Mind you that’s only when we’re enjoying a weekend breakfast at a local diner or at Grandma’s. I don’t think they even have access to print media at their school library. Comics are great for pithy insight and anyone who is afraid of them has something to hide.

  39. 39.

    redshirt

    March 12, 2012 at 12:41 pm

    My sarcastic, ironic enjoyment of “The Family Circus” has strangely somehow turned to sincere enjoyment. I’m not sure what’s happened.

    Ziggy too!

  40. 40.

    muddy

    March 12, 2012 at 1:44 pm

    @redshirt: Advancing senility?

  41. 41.

    trollhattan

    March 12, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    @rlrr:
    “Apparently somebody once put forth a convincing argument that Atlas Shrugged plagiarized a Little Orphan Annie story line.”

    The clue was a chapter titled, “Little Orphan Aynie.”

  42. 42.

    trollhattan

    March 12, 2012 at 1:48 pm

    @redshirt:

    Assume you’re familar with The Nietzsche Family Circus?

    http://www.losanjealous.com/nfc/

  43. 43.

    Chet

    March 13, 2012 at 7:01 am

    @JayC: We got “Gasoline Alley” in the Detroit Free Press when I was growing up in the ’80s, and I remember actually kind of enjoying it…at least in part, I think, precisely because it was sort of nifty to realize it was something that had actually been around in my great-grandparents’ day.

    It’s probably been 20 years since the Freep dropped it, and I can’t believe that it’s still around. Walt Wallet’s got to be, what, 120 years old by now?

  44. 44.

    bjacques

    March 13, 2012 at 9:51 am

    @Chet:

    “Skizziks” spelled backwards is “Skizziks!”

    One good thing about daily strips hanging on for decades is that the parodies of them in the old MAD comics (or paperback collections, or HELP, for that matter) are even better when you know what they’re lampooning.

    “Starchie” is still one of my favorites.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. What I’m Reading, Monday, March 12, 2012 | Rationally Thinking Out Loud says:
    March 12, 2012 at 11:21 am

    […] via: Balloon Juice » The Internet is for Porn and Doonesbury […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Open Thread (Anyone Up for a Balloon Juice Zoom on Saturday Evening?) (Mar 31, 2023 @ 5:30pm)
  • WaterGirl on Open Thread (Anyone Up for a Balloon Juice Zoom on Saturday Evening?) (Mar 31, 2023 @ 5:27pm)
  • sdhays on Everything That’s Good – Mockery Goes So Well With Coffee, Ice Cream, Forever Potus, Biden and MVP (Mar 31, 2023 @ 5:26pm)
  • JoyceH on Open Thread (Anyone Up for a Balloon Juice Zoom on Saturday Evening?) (Mar 31, 2023 @ 5:24pm)
  • Butter Emails on Everything That’s Good – Mockery Goes So Well With Coffee, Ice Cream, Forever Potus, Biden and MVP (Mar 31, 2023 @ 5:22pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!