• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Don’t expect peaches from an apple tree.

Everybody saw this coming.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Let’s finish the job.

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

After roe, women are no longer free.

In my day, never was longer.

In short, I come down firmly on all sides of the issue.

There is no compromise when it comes to body autonomy. You either have it or you don’t.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

I’m sure you banged some questionable people yourself.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Economics / C.R.E.A.M. / Sorry, Larry

Sorry, Larry

by Kay|  March 23, 20123:38 pm| 107 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M., David Brooks Giving A Seminar At The Aspen Institute, Foreign Affairs

FacebookTweetEmail

Anne Laurie was speculating on the World Bank pick earlier today, and I think it’s good news it wasn’t you-know-who after all:

President Barack Obama startled handicappers by selecting Dartmouth President Jim Yong Kim as the U.S. candidate to lead the World Bank rather than the reported front-runner Larry Summers, Obama’s former National Economic Council director.
The Korean-born Kim is a medical doctor, anthropologist, and MacArthur fellow, best known for his pioneering work to fight HIV and tuberculosis in the Third World. Kim helped develop treatments for drug-resistant TB, and then successfully pushed to reduced the cost of anti-TB drugs. He is close associate of Dr. Paul Farmer, the lead founder of Partners in Health and subject of Tracy Kidder’s 2003 book, Mountains Beyond Mountains.
While Third World leaders had pushed for an alternative to Summers, Kim was a total surprise. The appointment is a two-fer in the sense that it gives the job both to an American and to an Asian, as well as a welcome breakthrough in that the presidency goes to someone with on-the-ground work fighting poverty and disease as opposed to an international dignitary or economist.
Jeffrey Sachs, who audaciously threw his own hat into the ring, can take some credit for this surprise choice, since his own move created some pressure for Obama to think outside the box. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was also reportedly favorable to the Kim selection. For Summers, this ends a winning streak of falling upwards.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Song of the week
Next Post: Quittin’ time »

Reader Interactions

107Comments

  1. 1.

    gbear

    March 23, 2012 at 3:43 pm

    I blame Obama. :)

  2. 2.

    pragmatism

    March 23, 2012 at 3:43 pm

    the wingnut poutrage machine is already in force. i got 15 “WTF 0bummer nominated an ACADEMIC to head the world bank!” emails.

  3. 3.

    Baud

    March 23, 2012 at 3:45 pm

    the reported front-runner Larry Summers

    I wonder if it was Mr. Summers who led these “reporters” to believe he was the front-runner.

  4. 4.

    Baud

    March 23, 2012 at 3:46 pm

    @pragmatism: You need new friends.

  5. 5.

    Kay

    March 23, 2012 at 3:46 pm

    @pragmatism:

    “WTF 0bummer nominated an ACADEMIC to head the world bank!”

    Well, there’s no pleasing them, because they can’t read:

    with on-the-ground work fighting poverty and disease as opposed to an international dignitary or economist.

    That’s what they’re mad about. The “fighting poverty and disease” part.

  6. 6.

    Primigenius

    March 23, 2012 at 3:47 pm

    This is an interesting pick. I’m wary of Summers as are many, but if some rudimentary knowledge of economics isn’t required for this position, I guess I’ll go see a plumber the next time I need a TB test.

  7. 7.

    Schlemizel

    March 23, 2012 at 3:47 pm

    I really have to ask; what the heck prepares one to be head of the world bank? What the heck do they actually do for a living as head of the bank?

  8. 8.

    Judas Escargot, Your Postmodern Neighbor

    March 23, 2012 at 3:47 pm

    Don’t know this guy at all, but a good synopsis from Ezra here.

    Fun quote:

    “Why do you call your patients poor people?” Kim’s stock reply: “Okay, how about soon-dead people?”

    I think I like this guy…

  9. 9.

    cursorial

    March 23, 2012 at 3:48 pm

    I remember seeing him about to fall out of his chair laughing in the video of Conan O’Brian’s commencement address at Dartmouth. Nice to see it go to someone qualified, who also has a sense of humor. I suspect he’ll need it.

  10. 10.

    Aaron Baker

    March 23, 2012 at 3:48 pm

    “Falling upwards”? Shouldn’t that be “failing upwards”?

  11. 11.

    kay

    March 23, 2012 at 3:48 pm

    This means there’s an opening for Larry Summers to fight poverty and disease.

    But that would be unfair to the poor and sick, so maybe not that job either.

  12. 12.

    Napoleon

    March 23, 2012 at 3:48 pm

    @Primigenius:

    Of course economics is not the same thing as banking.

  13. 13.

    rlrr

    March 23, 2012 at 3:50 pm

    @pragmatism:

    WTF is wrong with academics?

  14. 14.

    Samuel Knight

    March 23, 2012 at 3:50 pm

    Since Summers was a disaster as President of Harvard, was despised as much as Wolfowitz, just astounding that anyone thought he should even be considered to head the world bank.

    Plus pretty famous as being kinda hard to work with.

  15. 15.

    Villago Delenda Est

    March 23, 2012 at 3:50 pm

    Summers was the Village’s pick.

    The “Conventional Wisdom” of the vermin of the Village is often wrong.

  16. 16.

    jl

    March 23, 2012 at 3:50 pm

    A good choice. Who knows what will happen to Kim’s agenda after it is put up against some of World Bank customs. But may lead to more emphasis by World Bank on investment in social capital, rather than traditional big international capital investment projects. The World Bank has already moved in the right direction, a little bit at least. Maybe Kim can push it further.

    I have stayed in some posh World Bank ‘investment projects’ while at international meetings. I can see why a certain sort of traveling important type of person (who does not want to wrassal with local traditions in, say, accommodations or bathroom design) would be impressed with them, but too much emphasis on them rather than social investment that addresses local problems that prevent human capital and development (eg, endemic disease, shortage of small capital to locals, or lack of access to education or health services.)

  17. 17.

    shortstop

    March 23, 2012 at 3:51 pm

    @kay: Snerk!

  18. 18.

    gbear

    March 23, 2012 at 3:52 pm

    Kthug approves.

  19. 19.

    kay

    March 23, 2012 at 3:52 pm

    @Primigenius:

    This is Ezra Klein:

    Unlike three of the last four World Bank presidents, he’s not a banker. Unlike both of the Bush administration’s picks, he’s not a diplomat or an old foreign policy hand. Unlike every other named candidate for the position — Jeffrey Sachs, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and Jose Antonio Ocampo — he’s not an economist or economic policymaker. He is, in other words, a new direction for the World Bank.
    Which fits, because the World Bank’s priorities are changing. As development expert Todd Moss explains, India, one of the bank’s largest fund recipients, is about to grow its way out of the International Development Association, the arm of the bank that primarily serves the world’s poorest countries. A host of others — including Vietnam, Ghana, Nigeria and Mongolia — are scheduled to follow soon after.
    As incomes in these countries rise, they need less help from the bank. So resources will shift to those countries that haven’t been able to take advantage of rising global prosperity. Nearly all of those 30 or so extremely low-income nations are fragile, post-conflict zones in Sub-Saharan Africa. And their needs are substantially different from those of rapidly developing countries like India.

  20. 20.

    RyanayR

    March 23, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    There’s been worse picks for the World Bank…

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/18/washington/18wolfowitz.html?pagewanted=all

  21. 21.

    Villago Delenda Est

    March 23, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    @gbear:

    Well, obviously this will just ratchet up the poutrage of the vermin of the Village and the wingtards to new heights of cretinous stupid.

  22. 22.

    Mnemosyne

    March 23, 2012 at 3:54 pm

    @Primigenius:

    A skim of the Wikipedia article on the World Bank leads me to believe that it’s supposed to be focused on development, not economics per se. In fact, a lot of the criticism of the WB seems to be because the Washington Consensus focused too much on the metrics economists love like GDP and not enough on things like roads and clean water that were supposed to be its mission.

    So this nomination sounds like it’s supposed to be a signal that the US is more interested in helping developing countries build infrastructure than in looting their pension funds.

  23. 23.

    Martin

    March 23, 2012 at 3:58 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    The “Conventional Wisdom” of the vermin of the Village is often wrong.

    ‘Conventional Wisdom’ is, by definition, either wrong or suspect. Anything outside of that is simply called knowledge and we don’t bother to label it.

  24. 24.

    Baud

    March 23, 2012 at 3:58 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    So this nomination sounds like it’s supposed to be a signal that the US is more interested in helping developing countries build infrastructure than in looting their pension funds.

    Good. Countries shouldn’t loot their pension funds until they are much further along in their economic development.

  25. 25.

    Cat Lady

    March 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    I was rooting for Jeffrey Sachs. I like that guy a lot, but it looks like he played a role so yeah, it’s good that there was some out of the box thinking. Maybe Summers can go back to being the scourge of the Winklevii and leave us poor science-challenged women alone.

  26. 26.

    Keith

    March 23, 2012 at 4:00 pm

    For Summers, this ends a winning streak of falling upwards.

    Tell that to his jowls.

  27. 27.

    lamh35

    March 23, 2012 at 4:00 pm

    So for all those who “feared” it would be Larry Summers for even though from my understanding no one from the Admin said it would be, it was just a village meme am I right, will POTUS get any credit from certain spheres of the intertubes for an “out of the box” and yet “kinda perfect” pick?

    Between this and the measured yet pitch-perfect response to the Trayvon Martin question and the shock of these SYC laws…at the very least it should make people realize that elections DO ave consequences!

  28. 28.

    kay

    March 23, 2012 at 4:02 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    Well, obviously this will just ratchet up the poutrage of the vermin of the Village and the wingtards to new heights of cretinous stupid

    He’s from Iowa, well, since he was 5.

    If they try anything nasty, we can call them coastal elitists who loathe The Heartland.

  29. 29.

    gwangung

    March 23, 2012 at 4:05 pm

    He’s from Iowa, well, since he was 5.
    __
    If they try anything nasty, we can call them coastal elitists who loathe The Heartland.

    Win!

  30. 30.

    PeakVT

    March 23, 2012 at 4:05 pm

    @Primigenius: Considering the performance of the economics profession in general over the past decade, I see no compelling reason to put one in charge of anything.

    Also, too: Anthropology AND medicine. That’s a combination of mental frameworks I’d love to upload to my brain.

    @kay: Snort.

  31. 31.

    Warren Terra

    March 23, 2012 at 4:05 pm

    He seems a bit of an uncertain quantity in terms of dealing with economists, bankers, and global diplomacy – but he certainly sounds like a stellar human being, and I have high hopes.

    I do think this whole discussion should include more comparison to, and opprobrium heaped upon, the appointment of Paul Wolfowitz.

  32. 32.

    pragmatism

    March 23, 2012 at 4:06 pm

    @Kay: agreed. they just read the headline.
    @rlrr: i asked one of the senders that question. no response yet. i’m guessing the usual “no practical experience” trope. which is easily disproven if they read the article.

  33. 33.

    Mnemosyne

    March 23, 2012 at 4:07 pm

    @lamh35:

    It helps that Krugman thinks it’s a brilliantly unexpected pick. But the people you’re thinking of have no problem ignoring Krugman when he doesn’t say what they want him to say.

  34. 34.

    KG

    March 23, 2012 at 4:08 pm

    on topic: no real comment. hopefully it works out.

    tangentially off topic: the phrase “failing upwards” always reminds me of the Kevin Smith speech about getting to rewrite the Superman reboot

  35. 35.

    Lawnguylander

    March 23, 2012 at 4:08 pm

    So Felix Salmon’s article was crap, then? Is he a Villager?

  36. 36.

    Brachiator

    March 23, 2012 at 4:10 pm

    So for all those who “feared” it would be Larry Summers for even though from my understanding no one from the Admin said it would be, it was just a village meme am I right, will POTUS get any credit from certain spheres of the intertubes for an “out of the box” and yet “kinda perfect” pick?

    Has Kim been properly vetted by the pearl clutching progressives?

    ETA: Very interestng to see that Krugman applauds the selection.

  37. 37.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    March 23, 2012 at 4:10 pm

    @Baud:

    Good. Countries shouldn’t loot their pension funds until they are much further along in their economic development.

    I see what you did there.

  38. 38.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    March 23, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    @Brachiator:

    The pearl divers of poutrage forgot to stick their grains of sand in this particular bank of oysters, so you might want to grab a Snickers bar, this might take a while.

  39. 39.

    o kanis

    March 23, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    A couple of Summers refreshers

    Larry Summers and the Subversion of Economics
    http://chronicle.com/article/Larry-Summersthe/124790/

    Harvard and Andrei Shieifer
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Shleifer#Activities_in_Russia

    Charlie Rose will have a sad tonight :-(

  40. 40.

    Ken

    March 23, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    @Mnemosyne: than in looting their pension funds.

    I think that’s supposed to be “establishing fiscal austerity measures to ensure the long-term economic health of the country.” It works out to the same thing but sounds more… economical.

  41. 41.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    March 23, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    @Brachiator:

    Has Kim been properly vetted by the pearl clutching progressives?

    I’m not giving FDL the distinct traffic hit but I’m sure others will sniff around to see if the firebaggers have their knickers in an uproar or not.

    @rlrr:

    What’s wrong with academics? They know stuff, all that edumacation and stuff is alien to (un)real ‘Murkins.

    Unless of course they’re “our” academics like Amity Schlaes or Niall Ferguson. Then they know their shit.

  42. 42.

    pragmatism

    March 23, 2012 at 4:19 pm

    @Baud: the worst part is that most of them came from my family. :(

  43. 43.

    PeakVT

    March 23, 2012 at 4:19 pm

    @Lawnguylander: No, he was still right that for the bank’s customers a non-Washington-insider would be a better choice. That’s been the main point of his series of posts on the subject. He cited Ngozi as the best of the candidates that people were talking about.

    @lamh35: It wasn’t just a villager meme; Summers wanted the job and was lobbying for it.

  44. 44.

    ericblair

    March 23, 2012 at 4:22 pm

    @Brachiator:

    Has Kim been properly vetted by the pearl clutching progressives?

    I think the important point is that Obama was going to so totally pick Summers (because you can tell what he’s thinking, you know), but the Prog Front wrote so many outraged blog posts and tweets that Obama just had to back down. So victory.

    Except now we know that he’s just pushing Kim out there to see him fail, so any failure to secure the nomination is Obama’s fault too. And if he does get the nomination, he’s going to be pressured and co-opted by the administration so any deviation from Prog Front desires is Obama’s fault too.

    Personally, this is probably a good direction for the World Bank, but I don’t know anything about the guy really and I don’t know how healthy it would be for yet another American to get the job.

  45. 45.

    boss bitch

    March 23, 2012 at 4:23 pm

    @Lamh35

    will POTUS get any credit from certain spheres of the intertubes for an “out of the box” and yet “kinda perfect” pick?

    No. Didn’t you see? Jeffrey Sachs gave him the idea.

  46. 46.

    jl

    March 23, 2012 at 4:23 pm

    The World Bank has always had a mandate for development, rather than financial shenanigans, which is more the IMF’s territory.

    But for a long time the WB believed the economic CW that effective development policies required big investments in big projects that attracted foreign dollars and led to fast growth in exports. So, that lead to lot of big corporate projects. Not nearly enough emphasis on smaller scale projects that lead to development from the bottom up.

    Way too much emphasis on corporation lead, trickle down, economics.

  47. 47.

    Mnemosyne

    March 23, 2012 at 4:23 pm

    @Lawnguylander:

    I don’t think Kim’s name even came up in Salmon’s article. I’d be interested to see if he does a follow-up now that a candidate’s name is known since all of the ones he was speculating about were the Village-approved names like Summers and Sachs.

  48. 48.

    Mike Goetz

    March 23, 2012 at 4:25 pm

    He’s from Dartmouth, which is the bastion of Ivy-League ‘wingers, so that might help him.

    I would have been fine with Summers too, even if he does bear the mark of Cain upon him, and must never be spoken of favorably again.

  49. 49.

    Schad

    March 23, 2012 at 4:26 pm

    Looks like a great pick to me. While he isn’t an economist, he’s well-versed in the machinations of the international development community, and with his experience there’s an outside chance that he can achieve the unachievable: making the World Bank work in concert with the other multilateral development and trade organizations, rather than veering of in its own desired directions, coherent policy be damned.

  50. 50.

    boss bitch

    March 23, 2012 at 4:27 pm

    @ericblair: oh my god, you hit the nail right on the head.

  51. 51.

    Helena Montana

    March 23, 2012 at 4:27 pm

    This is good/bad news for me, because I am professionally exposed to Larry Summers far more often than anybody should have to be, and if he went to the World Bank, he might stop doing business with my firm. Probably not though. I’m afraid he’s a lifelong affliction. But I’m glad at least he won’t be the World Bank’s affliction.

  52. 52.

    Mnemosyne

    March 23, 2012 at 4:27 pm

    Also, too, I have to admit I’m enjoying picturing Summers’ probable reaction upon being told, “Sorry, Larry, but we’ve decided to go with a college president. No, a current college president. Look, we decided to go with someone else, okay?”

    (I can’t remember what movie that’s from, where the character keeps protesting that he has the same qualifications, only to be told in exasperation that they went with someone else.)

  53. 53.

    pragmatism

    March 23, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    @Mike Goetz:

    I would have been fine with Summers too, even if he does bear the mark of Cain upon him

    summers has 9-9-9 on his forehead? or is it a representation of a pizza?

  54. 54.

    goethean

    March 23, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    Should have been Amartya Sen.

  55. 55.

    Egg Berry

    March 23, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    It’s 11-dimensional banking!

  56. 56.

    PeakVT

    March 23, 2012 at 4:30 pm

    @Mnemosyne: He already has.

  57. 57.

    Egg Berry

    March 23, 2012 at 4:31 pm

    @ericblair:

    I think the important point is that Obama was going to so totally pick Summers (because you can tell what he’s thinking, you know), but the Prog Front wrote so many outraged blog posts and tweets that Obama just had to back down. So victory.

    You mean VICTORY!

  58. 58.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    March 23, 2012 at 4:33 pm

    @Egg Berry: Well, passing around small green rectangles isn’t working, so maybe more dimensions will help.

  59. 59.

    Mnemosyne

    March 23, 2012 at 4:37 pm

    @PeakVT:

    Yeah, I don’t think I agree with him. He thinks that an economist/banker should still be the head even though the policies that economists and bankers at the World Bank proposed ended up being pretty disastrous for actual development in the third world (as opposed to the rent-seeking “development” of churning financial markets that the Washington Consensus encouraged).

    If the plan is to re-direct the World Bank back to encouraging and financing infrastructure in developing countries rather than growing their GDP, I think Kim may be a better choice than the economists and bankers that Salmon prefers.

  60. 60.

    Gus

    March 23, 2012 at 4:39 pm

    Holy shit, that may be the most impressive résumé I’ve ever seen.

  61. 61.

    Davis X. Machina

    March 23, 2012 at 4:41 pm

    I don’t see how the snake pit that is an Ivy League faculty senate can be much better, or worse, than where’s he’s going.

    Primas can only get so donna.

  62. 62.

    gwangung

    March 23, 2012 at 4:42 pm

    If the plan is to re-direct the World Bank back to encouraging and financing infrastructure in developing countries rather than growing their GDP, I think Kim may be a better choice than the economists and bankers that Salmon prefers.

    As in doing the grassroots spadework in development, as opposed to the top down modes of economists?

  63. 63.

    Culture of Truth

    March 23, 2012 at 4:42 pm

    The Korean-born Kim is a medical doctor, anthropologist, and MacArthur fellow, best known for his pioneering work to fight HIV and tuberculosis in the Third World.

    What a snob!

    .

  64. 64.

    Mnemosyne

    March 23, 2012 at 4:45 pm

    @gwangung:

    As in doing the grassroots spadework in development, as opposed to the top down modes of economists?

    Exactly. I’ll be curious to see how the nomination goes — I’m assuming it has to be approved by the Senate? I’m not really sure.

  65. 65.

    Gin & Tonic

    March 23, 2012 at 4:48 pm

    @Mnemosyne: No Senate confirmation.

  66. 66.

    Jay in Oregon

    March 23, 2012 at 4:50 pm

    @pragmatism:
    @rlrr:

    It’s typically winger shorthand for “out-of-touch intellectual/elitist who doesn’t understand how things work in the REEEEEEAL world.”

  67. 67.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    March 23, 2012 at 4:51 pm

    @Jay in Oregon: And we all know the “REAL WORLD” is the space between the couch and the TV.

  68. 68.

    dadanarchist

    March 23, 2012 at 4:54 pm

    This is a great choice. Partners in Health, which Dr. Kim helped found with Dr. Paul Farmer, is one of the best charities around (esp. in Haiti). And, Farmer and Partners in Health believe that healthcare is as much an issue of social justice as it is an issue of delivery. So Glenn Beck should be blowing a gasket any moment now.

  69. 69.

    Gin & Tonic

    March 23, 2012 at 4:55 pm

    @Mnemosyne: To clarify: this is not a US cabinet or equivalent position. It has to be approved by the World Bank’s executive board, only. And I can’t imagine for a second that Obama would have nominated him if he weren’t already sure that the votes are there.

  70. 70.

    Culture of Truth

    March 23, 2012 at 4:55 pm

    Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner backed Kim, said an administration official. Geithner graduated from Dartmouth College with a bachelor’s degree in government and Asian studies.

    ZOMG!!!!!!!

  71. 71.

    WaterGirl

    March 23, 2012 at 4:55 pm

    @Mnemosyne: Dustin Hoffman in Tootsie.

  72. 72.

    Mnemosyne

    March 23, 2012 at 4:56 pm

    Also, too, I’m just going by Wikipedia, but it sounds like the original mandate of the World Bank was more of a grassroots thing. Developing countries would come to the WB and say, “We’d like you to loan us money to build some roads and schools, and for mosquito abatement to reduce malaria” and the WB would examine the proposal to see if it was viable. The IMF was supposed to be the institution that was looking at the overall economic health of the country and concentrating on things like GDP. The World Bank was supposed to be financing infrastructure.

    But then, as they did here in the US, the neocons and free marketeers pounced when they spotted free money being given to people who would spend it on roads and schools and not complicated financial instruments, so they convinced DLCers like Clinton that the World Bank should have essentially the same mission as the IMF.

    I could very well be talking out of my ass here, so anyone who knows better should feel free to correct me.

  73. 73.

    KS in MA

    March 23, 2012 at 4:56 pm

    @Judas Escargot, Your Postmodern Neighbor: Fabulous!

  74. 74.

    Mnemosyne

    March 23, 2012 at 4:57 pm

    @WaterGirl:

    That’s it! It was on TCM a few months ago and we were all live-critiquing it.

  75. 75.

    Culture of Truth

    March 23, 2012 at 4:58 pm

    While a student at Harvard Medical School, Kim co- founded Partners in Health, a nonprofit organization that hasopened clinics in countries including Haiti and Peru. Kim, while working for the group in Peru in the mid-1990s, helped develop a treatment program for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

    Paul Wolfowitz, [ supporter of wars based on lies,] and a former deputy secretary of defense in the administration of George W. Bush , who resigned under pressure in 2007 after giving his companion an unusually large pay raise and promotion.

    So pretty much the same.

  76. 76.

    schrodinger's cat

    March 23, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    @Helena Montana: May be he will retire soon.

  77. 77.

    Citizen Alan

    March 23, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    Summers was the Village’s pick.

    You’re missing an “r.”

  78. 78.

    Culture of Truth

    March 23, 2012 at 5:01 pm

    The choice is subject to approval by the board of bank, and a decision is scheduled by April 20.

    “We are the committee”

    Name that Movie!

  79. 79.

    PeakVT

    March 23, 2012 at 5:08 pm

    @Mnemosyne: I think he really had his heart set on Ngozi, so he’s being a tad sour. And while Ngozi is an economist with a history at the WB, I don’t think she is cut off from the on-the-ground issues of development.

    I think Kim is a good pick, and probably the best pick Obama could make that wouldn’t upset Congress and jeopardize funding. Unfortunately, an African female would just not have gone over well with the cretins currently running the show in the House.

  80. 80.

    Brachiator

    March 23, 2012 at 5:10 pm

    @ericblair:

    Personally, this is probably a good direction for the World Bank, but I don’t know anything about the guy really and I don’t know how healthy it would be for yet another American to get the job.

    Apparently, some traditions endure:

    Tradition has held that Washington selects the head of the World Bank and Europe the leader of its sister institution, the International Monetary Fund, since they were founded during World War II.

    I recall some vague scuttlebutt somewhere that Secretary of State Clinton was on the short list for the World Bank.

    I don’t see much mention of Kim’s religion. This must be deeply troubling to the Santorums of the world.

  81. 81.

    S. cerevisiae

    March 23, 2012 at 5:10 pm

    Wingnut e-mail screaming that Obama picked a North Korean dictator to head the World Bank in 3…2…1…

  82. 82.

    Emma

    March 23, 2012 at 5:11 pm

    @Davis X. Machina: My thoughts exactly. If he can handle a bunch of department heads in a budget fight, he can handle anything.

  83. 83.

    dogwood

    March 23, 2012 at 5:11 pm

    This is a stellar nomination. For anyone here who hasn’t read Tracy Kidder’s Mountains Beyond Mountains, I can’t recommend it highly enough. I’ve been donating yearly to Partners in Health from the moment I closed the book. And anyone who would doubt Dr. Kim’s ability to deal with the issues facing the World Bank and it’s committment to underdeveloped nations because he’s an “academic” is really selling Dr. Kim short. He might be president of Dartmouth now, but his life is a testament to actually committing yourself to difficult work and getting things done. I’m glad Kim was willing to take the job, but get ready to see wingnuts go after Kim and Paul Farmer with a vengeance.

  84. 84.

    danielx

    March 23, 2012 at 5:13 pm

    @Primigenius:

    I’d say with his background this guy probably has at least a rudimentary knowledge of economics. Considering Summers’ and Wolfowitz’s records of epic fail and general assholery, I can’t see how Kim could possibly do any worse….

  85. 85.

    Lawnguylander

    March 23, 2012 at 5:14 pm

    @PeakVT:

    No. Salmon’s analysis was independently and completely wrong. Can’t blame the Villagers for that unless the Villager in question is Salmon.

  86. 86.

    Uncle Cosmo

    March 23, 2012 at 5:15 pm

    @Martin: IMO what we get from the Villagers, conventional or un-, deserves to be referred to derisively as “whizzdumb“. It’s more descriptive of what actually underlies their pronouncements. (NB number of z’s can be varied according to mood & sleep deficit.)

  87. 87.

    Hawes

    March 23, 2012 at 5:24 pm

    OK, mea culpa. I went to Dartmouth. If you can handle the raging factions of rich snobby alums, frat boys resenting the loss of their male privilege (which group may or may not have included me at some point), academicians and a student body that has gotten remarkably diverse since he took over… World Bank should be cake.

    I also read Mountains Beyond Mountains and what I remember is that he grew exasperated by Farmer’s purity at times. Kim wanted to do the most for the most, rather than all for some. That’s why he led the way in Peru with antibiotic resistant TB.

    Frankly, as an alum, I’m sad to lose the first really inspired and inspiring president we’ve had up in Hangover, but heartened for the World Bank.

  88. 88.

    Villago Delenda Est

    March 23, 2012 at 5:24 pm

    @dadanarchist:

    So Glenn Beck should be blowing a gasket any moment now.

    The poor baby.

    May he blow many more. To include the demonic substitutes for valves in his demonic substitute for a heart.

  89. 89.

    dogwood

    March 23, 2012 at 5:25 pm

    @danielx:

    I’d say with his background this guy probably has at least a rudimentary knowledge of economics.

    How nice of you to give the guy your begrudging seal of approval. You don’t do the kind of work Dr. Kim and Dr. Farmer did for years with just a rudimentary knowledge of economics.

  90. 90.

    PeakVT

    March 23, 2012 at 5:27 pm

    @Lawnguylander: How was it wrong? Was Salmon supposed to examine the entire universe of possible candidates?

  91. 91.

    Phoenician in a time of Romans

    March 23, 2012 at 5:35 pm

    @Kay:

    That’s what they’re mad about. The “fighting poverty and disease” part.

    No, they’re mad because the Black Guy did something. Anything. If he had nominated Rush Limbaugh as head of teh World Bank, they’d be mad.

  92. 92.

    Ozymandias, King of Ants

    March 23, 2012 at 5:38 pm

    @Culture of Truth: Chariots of Fire.

  93. 93.

    Ozymandias, King of Ants

    March 23, 2012 at 5:47 pm

    The World Bank isn’t lacking in economists, and the directorship is an inherently political job.

    So why did Villagers think it would go to Summers in the first place? As an economist, he’d possibly be duplicating skills that already exist on the staff, and as a politician, he’s harder to work with than Attila the Hun.

  94. 94.

    Anne Laurie

    March 23, 2012 at 5:50 pm

    @kay:

    He’s from Iowa, well, since he was 5.
    __
    If they try anything nasty, we can call them coastal elitists who loathe The Heartland.

    As a geek, I am impelled to mention the scene from Star Trek 2:

    Bystander: What the — are you from outer space?
    __
    Time-travelling Capt. Kirk: No, I’m from Iowa. I just work in outer space.

  95. 95.

    Anne Laurie

    March 23, 2012 at 5:53 pm

    @Ozymandias, King of Ants:

    So why did Villagers think it would go to Summers in the first place?

    Because Summers was telling the Villagers that he was the Only Possible Best Choice for the job, and conventional wisdom is that Larry Summers is never wrong.

  96. 96.

    Lawnguylander

    March 23, 2012 at 5:59 pm

    @PeakVT:

    It wasn’t that he didn’t know who Obama would nominate. Admitting he had no idea at all would have been the honest thing to write, but it wouldn’t have been very Savvy so we can’t have that. It was the crap about Summers and Clinton that was crap. Just because his analysis was coming from many of his readers would see as a more righteous perspective doesn’t make it any less wrong.

  97. 97.

    Judas Escargot

    March 23, 2012 at 6:06 pm

    @jl:

    Not nearly enough emphasis on smaller scale projects that lead to development from the bottom up.

    If one presupposes there’s such a thing as “Human Capital”, then you’re forced to admit that health care is a human capital issue. Which therefore also makes it a development issue.

    In some ways, this is brutally capitalist: Kind of hard to build factories (or to buy anything made in one) when you’re busy dying of TB and rickets.

    Given that mindset, the pick makes sense to me.

  98. 98.

    pluege

    March 23, 2012 at 6:06 pm

    For Summers, this ends a winning streak of falling upwards.

    shouldn’t that be: “…failing upwards”?

  99. 99.

    taylormattd

    March 23, 2012 at 6:07 pm

    I have decided this pick doesn’t exist, given my understanding is OBAMA IS A CORPORATE WHORE HE SOLD US ALL OUT TO THE BANKS CORPORATE MASTERS FNORD

  100. 100.

    PeakVT

    March 23, 2012 at 6:21 pm

    @Lawnguylander: Where did Salmon ever say he knew who Obama would nominate?

  101. 101.

    David Koch

    March 23, 2012 at 6:35 pm

    This is disappointing, I though Obama was going to nominate Hitler?

    Really upset that Obama let Hitler down.

  102. 102.

    Greg

    March 23, 2012 at 6:36 pm

    @Anne Laurie:

    As a geek, I am impelled to mention the scene from Star Trek 2:

    As a geek, I feel compelled to correct you. That scene was from Star Trek 4.

  103. 103.

    Weaselone

    March 23, 2012 at 6:46 pm

    It’s actually an inspired choice. One of the key economic issues facing many developing countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa is health, namely the infection of large percentages of their working age populations and children with HIV and TB. This imposes massive costs on families, society and the meager resources at the nations’ disposal. It also depletes valuable human capital.

    I’m also fairly confident that a man with a doctorate in Anthropology and a long history of working in global health has a sizable amount of experience with the economics of the developing world and is intimately acquainted with the tools and methodologies of economists.

  104. 104.

    Phil Perspective

    March 23, 2012 at 7:47 pm

    @ericblair: They probably have no clue who this guy was/is, and I bet neither did you before today. Like anyone else, I am sure they are just happy Larry Summers wasn’t picked, if they care anything at all about this appointment.

  105. 105.

    Felanius Kootea

    March 23, 2012 at 7:51 pm

    Fantastic choice – he helped co-found Partners in Health and did some amazing work in Haiti and Peru (and now they’re also in Rwanda). I always liked Jim Kim and Paul Farmer’s philosophy of having *a preferential option for the poor*. I believe he worked for the WHO before heading out to Dartmouth, so he does have some experience with diplomacy of sorts.

  106. 106.

    Lawnguylander

    March 23, 2012 at 9:38 pm

    @PeakVT

    Where did Salmon ever say he knew who Obama would nominate?

    Here:

    This is really bad news, because by a process of elimination it more or less forces Obama to go with Larry Summers.

    That seems pretty straight forward to me. Obama was not forced to go with Larry Summers. The speculation about Hillary Clinton was just silly, but there he might have been fucking around and making fun of other people who were publicly pushing her for the job. I’m not sure.

  107. 107.

    mainmati

    March 23, 2012 at 11:40 pm

    I have been working for more than 30 years in the developing world; more than half of my life has been spent there. My field is environment but this sluices into health at many levels. I’m also an economist and I am sick and tired of seeing bankers proposed to these positions. Yes, Wolfowitz was not a banker; he was a NeoCon asshole. Neither was McNamara, who despite his terrible Vietnam legacy was the best WB President, ever, ardently pro-poor, actually a radical by today’s very diminished standards.

    My question about this out-of-the-box choice is will he be up to the challenge of managing a really mammoth bureaucracy, albeit one that aspires to be a real meritocracy. This is not a university or an NGO.

    I wish him all the best and hope he’s got a really solid team backing him up.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • CaseyL on Biden Announces American Climate Corps (Sep 21, 2023 @ 11:36am)
  • WaterGirl on Biden Announces American Climate Corps (Sep 21, 2023 @ 11:35am)
  • a thousand flouncing lurkers (was fidelio) on Grey Dawn Open Thread: The Missing F35 Has Been Found (Dammit) (Sep 21, 2023 @ 11:35am)
  • rikyrah on Biden Announces American Climate Corps (Sep 21, 2023 @ 11:34am)
  • Ksmiami on Thursday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Death Cult Doubles Down In Its War On Women (Sep 21, 2023 @ 11:34am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!