• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

How stupid are these people?

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Peak wingnut was a lie.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

People are weird.

White supremacy is terrorism.

Beware of advice from anyone for whom Democrats are “they” and not “we.”

Quote tweet friends, screenshot enemies.

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

All hail the time of the bunny!

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

DeSantis transforming Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

Those who are easily outraged are easily manipulated.

Donald Trump found guilty as fuck – May 30, 2024!

America is going up in flames. The NYTimes fawns over MAGA celebrities. No longer a real newspaper.

In after Baud. Damn.

“Perhaps I should have considered other options.” (head-desk)

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

It’s all just conspiracy shit beamed down from the mothership.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Suck on this PUMAs

Suck on this PUMAs

by DougJ|  March 30, 20129:26 pm| 65 Comments

This post is in: We Are All Mayans Now

FacebookTweetEmail

I’m not reading it, let alone linking but I just saw this on Kaplan.

I mean this as an honest question to all of you who were die-hard Hillary supporters: how do you defend her putting Mark Penn in charge of her campaign? I like Hillary, I would have voted for her in the general, I would have given money to her in the general, I would be supporting her just as strongly as I support Obama if she were president…but WTF?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Unite and fight, you have nothing to lose but your tote bags
Next Post: Meanwhile, in the Cole Abode »

Reader Interactions

65Comments

  1. 1.

    The prophet Nostradumbass

    March 30, 2012 at 9:31 pm

    Penn worked on Bill’s 1996 re-election campaign, and on Hillary’s 2000 and 2006 Senate campaigns, and you wonder why she picked him for her 2008 Presidential run?

  2. 2.

    dmsilev

    March 30, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    I won’t know how to respond until you tell me how midgets between the ages of 30 and 35 who drive Fords think about Obamacare.

  3. 3.

    porter

    March 30, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    That’s the sort of concern trolling I would expect from Greenwald or Cole. Yea, wtf?! Way to put personal history ahead of your party and country even when it’s against your own self interests you unprofessional douche

  4. 4.

    beltane

    March 30, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    Time to dust off the old tag “I can no longer rationally discuss the Clinton campaign”?

    No question that Hillary surrounded herself with the worst of hacks, and not just Mark Penn.

  5. 5.

    the Conster (f/k/a Cat Lady)

    March 30, 2012 at 9:35 pm

    The Clintons are responsible for giving us Dick Morris, also too. This is why I never would have voted for Hillary over Barack, ever. All of those FOB scum suckers would’ve all slithered back over the transom.

  6. 6.

    Cacti

    March 30, 2012 at 9:38 pm

    Here’s a rejoinder:

    If Obama loses, will it validate Penn’s total turkey of a campaign in 2008?

  7. 7.

    Steve

    March 30, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    I will offer an answer. Like everyone else, I thought Mark Penn was an idiot of course, but so what? If you like a candidate, are you seriously going to switch to someone else because their advisor sucks? She made a bad choice and, to the extent a different outcome was available, I guess she paid the price for it.

    Maybe Hillary would pick horrible people for her Cabinet and totally screw up her presidency, I dunno. But all that is just speculation. I still admire her and I was proud to vote for her.

  8. 8.

    Litlebritdifrnt

    March 30, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    I was under the impression that Hillary still owes Penn millions of dollars, for what? Mounting a losing campaign that didn’t know how to count delegates. I would have been fired for that crap.

  9. 9.

    NobodySpecial

    March 30, 2012 at 9:40 pm

    I didn’t vote for her, but I can see that she thought the old rules still applied and she went with the people she knew, bad as they were.

  10. 10.

    kth

    March 30, 2012 at 9:42 pm

    Dick Morris, whom Bill Clinton brought in after the 1994 House losses, makes Mark Penn look like Bill Moyers. But I’ve never blamed the Clintons–they obviously have a warped view of the electorate based on how insane Arkansas politics is, not to mention the impeachment (which arguably was Arkansas politics following them to Washington). Their incessant desire to get right with redneck America is quite possibly more battered politician syndrome than any true cultural or political affinity.

  11. 11.

    Splitting Image

    March 30, 2012 at 9:42 pm

    I don’t think very many people would defend the choice, but I can understand not seeing it as disqualifying in and of itself.

    I mean: Penn more or less ensured Clinton’s defeat, but if she had won, that wouldn’t have been the case, would it?

  12. 12.

    cthulhu

    March 30, 2012 at 9:53 pm

    Isn’t Penn part and parcel of the whole New Dem/DLC crap? Not that Obama has strayed too much from that approach but sheesh, we need better Dems. (And Hillary herself certainly deserved better).

  13. 13.

    Heliopause

    March 30, 2012 at 9:53 pm

    Doug, go out and have a drink, because relitigating this on a Friday night means you don’t have enough to do.

  14. 14.

    slag

    March 30, 2012 at 9:55 pm

    Priorities, DougJ. You may be misplacing them.

  15. 15.

    arguingwithsignposts

    March 30, 2012 at 9:55 pm

    Mark Penn = the “democrat” Bill Kristol. Nuff said

  16. 16.

    Splitting Image

    March 30, 2012 at 9:56 pm

    Oh, and incidentally, I watched UHF a couple of days ago. Victoria Jackson’s involvement doesn’t stop me from enjoying the movie one bit.

  17. 17.

    jl

    March 30, 2012 at 9:57 pm

    Answer: No.

    That is about as simple as I can make it for him. Let me know if the corrupt incompetent brute Penn has any more questions.

    Does ‘pavo bruto’ mean something in Spanish slang? I hope it does. To the extent that it is decipherable, it was made for guys like Penn, IMHO.

  18. 18.

    Schlemizel

    March 30, 2012 at 10:01 pm

    Truth be told Hillary might very well be President today if she had not chosen that artificial fart to run her campaign. There is a symmetry of some sort there

  19. 19.

    R Johnston

    March 30, 2012 at 10:08 pm

    Mark Penn was indefensible. Of course Obama’s health care plan, as opposed to Clinton’s and as opposed to reality, was also indefensible, and his health care plan was the only discernible difference in his campaign to Clinton’s.

    Politicians suck. They’re morons. There may be exceptions, but Obama is not among them.

  20. 20.

    WeeBey

    March 30, 2012 at 10:08 pm

    This post, FTW.

  21. 21.

    beltane

    March 30, 2012 at 10:09 pm

    While we’re taking this little trip down memory lane, let us not forget Lanny Davis or that noblewoman with the common touch, Lady Lynn De Rothschild.

  22. 22.

    Donut

    March 30, 2012 at 10:10 pm

    Am I the only one who is not taking this post so seriously? I am having a hard time seeing this as reliving 2008 – the question is, does Mark Penn have any credibility on the issues on 2012? Fair question and hardly a call to reexamine Hillary vs Barack. My answer is no, he was awfully bad in 2008 and probably cost her the nomination, so he’s fair game for criticism whenever he opens his maw about what will bring down Democrats this year.

  23. 23.

    eemom

    March 30, 2012 at 10:14 pm

    WTF indeed. Have I stumbled onto the BJ equivalent of that memeorandum glitch a few weeks ago where a 2008 page kept popping up?

    Let’s do the time warp agaaaaiiiiiiin…..

    Srsly dude. You need to take a sabbatical from TROLLING if this is the best you can come up with.

  24. 24.

    beltane

    March 30, 2012 at 10:14 pm

    @Donut: I think that is the point of the post. How could anyone take Mark Penn’s opinion on anything seriously? This is the guy who was paid millions of dollars to run Hillary’s campaign and who somehow was unable to figure out how the Democratic party’s nominating process worked.

    I was hoping Mark Penn had joined Team Romney. He would fit right in there.

  25. 25.

    Corner Stone

    March 30, 2012 at 10:17 pm

    @Donut:

    Am I the only one who is not taking this post so seriously?

    Total troll post on DougJ’s part. He didn’t get what he wanted with the earlier totebagger post so he’s pushing the next troll button.

  26. 26.

    Mike in NC

    March 30, 2012 at 10:18 pm

    Penn is most likely on “Rmoney’s” payroll these days.

  27. 27.

    Corner Stone

    March 30, 2012 at 10:19 pm

    @the Conster (f/k/a Cat Lady):

    All of those FOB scum suckers would’ve all slithered back over the transom.

    Ummm…this is some kind of deranged humor, right?

  28. 28.

    taylormattd

    March 30, 2012 at 10:24 pm

    @The prophet Nostradumbass: Lol. Yeah, clearly, it was him that won those particular elections, nevermind him being, you know, always wrong during those elections.

  29. 29.

    nipsip

    March 30, 2012 at 10:26 pm

    The Republicans and the Tea Party own Healthcare in America if the ACA is overturned by a Conservative, Political SCOTUS.

    IMO, Obama wins both ways. He tried to do it involving the private sector, since it was a Conservative idea. It really works well for the insurance companies. However in a concerted effort to undo anything a black president does, it was not a go.

    17MM children, and 17MM seniors will feel the affect right away if ACA is overturned and the Republicans have no answer for the questions. “Why should my premiums go up to treat people who buy a bass boat instead of health care insurance”? Why should my tax money pay for hospitals who treat people who smoke, are obese, pre-diabetic, and will not change their ways and refuse to buy health care insurance.

    This time a single payer is the answer.

  30. 30.

    The prophet Nostradumbass

    March 30, 2012 at 10:26 pm

    @porter:

    That’s the sort of concern trolling I would expect from Greenwald or Cole. Yea, wtf?! Way to put personal history ahead of your party and country even when it’s against your own self interests you unprofessional douche

    Isn’t there some gayness in the media somewhere you could be complaining about?

  31. 31.

    jl

    March 30, 2012 at 10:26 pm

    @Corner Stone: Not sure what DougJ MasterTroll of BJ Land is after. Since I was a die hard of none of the Democratic candidates in 08, I cannot answer DougJ’s question, and do not see why I should try, even if I had been a die hard HRC supporter.

    So, I just saw the post as an opportunity to ridicule the incompetent and nasty bully (and corrupt, did I say corrupt?) Penn. Which is reason enough to make a comment.

    Sorry, DougJ, I did the best I could. We fallible human clay have been letting you down lately.

  32. 32.

    taylormattd

    March 30, 2012 at 10:27 pm

    @Donut: And why not? Why shouldn’t we rexamine this, given douchebags like Penn are still around vomiting stupidity everywhere?

    For that matter, why shouldn’t we revisit this given many of the psychopath trolls who, to this day, pretend to be paragons of pure progressive virtue spent all of 2007 and 2008 screaming about how Obama was a pussy who wouldn’t bomb enough Serbias at 2 am?

  33. 33.

    kwAwk

    March 30, 2012 at 10:43 pm

    It’s amazing to me how bitter O-bots are about an election they won.

    From Penn’s article:

    Part of the problem with the health-care law is that controlling costs and improving quality took a back seat to broadening coverage. A redo would allow Obama to produce a new plan that covers these bases, costs less and has broader support. He should treat an adverse ruling as a political gift, an opportunity to move to the center on health care, more like where he was in 2008.

    Maybe you shouldn’t prejudge the article and actually read it.

  34. 34.

    Corner Stone

    March 30, 2012 at 10:52 pm

    Now, I’m talking about

    You and me… and her and her and her, simultaneous
    You and me… and women in the house, simultaneous
    Three and seven, make it a baker’s dozen
    See the ladies in the house clap your hands
    Now that’d be a party, ladies

  35. 35.

    Steve

    March 30, 2012 at 10:53 pm

    @kwAwk: Wouldn’t the center on health care be somewhere to the left of the Heritage Foundation plan?

  36. 36.

    slag

    March 30, 2012 at 10:54 pm

    @kwAwk:

    He should treat an adverse ruling as a political gift, an opportunity to move to the center on health care, more like where he was in 2008.

    Yes. Why prejudge? Look how wrong you can go when you prejudge.
    __
    Just imagine how great a political gift this ruling can be. I hear the rallying cry now: “Once more into the center, dear friends, once more!”. It’s a surefire winner. I can’t believe Shakespeare didn’t think of it first.

  37. 37.

    porter

    March 30, 2012 at 10:54 pm

    @The prophet Nostradumbass: Looks like I made quite an impression on you my hypersensitive little insecure groupie.

  38. 38.

    dww44

    March 30, 2012 at 10:57 pm

    @kwAwk:

    He (Obama) should treat an adverse ruling as a political gift, an opportunity to move to the center on health care, more like where he was in 2008.

    I hate to be dense, but in this comment is Penn saying that Obama should move to the center from the left, vis-a-vis the ACA legislation? How much more centrist could that policy have been? As Howard Dean said on my teevee, over and over again in the runup to passing the ACA, it was really insurance reform, not health care reform. I don’t get how any rational being would think of the ACA as some sort of socialist leftist policy. But then, maybe I’m one of the latter and no one’s told me yet.

  39. 39.

    ant

    March 30, 2012 at 11:01 pm

    @kwAwk:

    Maybe you shouldn’t prejudge the article and actually read it.

    pfft

    an opportunity to move to the center on health care,

    no thanks.

  40. 40.

    Marcellus Shale, Public Dick

    March 30, 2012 at 11:07 pm

    what will the clown car propose for health care reform?

    at this point in the scrotus show.

    wish a motherfucker would.

  41. 41.

    Rome Again

    March 30, 2012 at 11:08 pm

    I’ve been under the impression that PUMAs will ALWAYS be anti-Obamaites. This is not surprising to me in the least.

  42. 42.

    David Koch

    March 30, 2012 at 11:15 pm

    “Mark Penn: Will Obamacare defeat Obama”

    He must mean Obama’s half brother in Kenya.

    Certainly, he can’t mean the President Obama who’s leading Mittens by 11 pts in this Wednesday’s CNN poll and Mittens by 17 in Wisconsin in today’s NBC poll.

  43. 43.

    The Snarxist Formerly Known As Kryptik

    March 30, 2012 at 11:24 pm

    The goddamned stupid thing is that Obama and the Dems already moved to the center and beyond with ‘Obamacare’. This is basically the same goddamned plan the GOP proposed in opposition to Hillary’s plan way back then.

    And yet….I can’t see anything but total fucking disaster if the Supremes overturn it. Single Payer is a pipe dream, especially with this Congress, and you know the Supremes will decide to shit on that idea even worse if they’re kiboshing the mandate. And all the GOP will see is blood in the water. Will it tank Obama? I doubt it. Will it tank the party’s (as a whole) hopes in November? I can’t see anything but the GOP doubling down on the crazy, and the public doubling down with them in celebration. Because apparently, Obamacare is the WORSTEST SOSHULISMS IN THE HISTORY OF FUCKIGN EVERRFRRRREHFKJDFHDF.

  44. 44.

    David Koch

    March 30, 2012 at 11:25 pm

    @R Johnston:

    his health care plan was the only discernible difference in his campaign to Clinton’s.

    There was another tiny little difference http://tinyurl.com/87lz929

  45. 45.

    David Koch

    March 30, 2012 at 11:28 pm

    @dmsilev:

    tell me how midgets between the ages of 30 and 35 who drive Fords think about Obamacare.

    Mark Penn drives a Ford?

  46. 46.

    David Koch

    March 30, 2012 at 11:36 pm

    He (Obama) should treat an adverse ruling as a political gift, an opportunity to move to the center on health care, more like where he was in 2008.

    All kidding aside, this is why Mark Penn shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near Hillary. With the above quote, he paint Hillary’s 2008 mandate plan as leftist, when mandates are a Heritage Foundation’s idea. Penn is a complete political moron.

  47. 47.

    El Cid

    March 30, 2012 at 11:39 pm

    Admit it — this was a ‘hey y’all, watch this’ post.

  48. 48.

    David Koch

    March 30, 2012 at 11:44 pm

    @porter:

    That’s the sort of concern trolling I would expect from Greenwald

    How dare you call Glenn a troll, just because he trolls his own posts under different names.

  49. 49.

    The prophet Nostradumbass

    March 30, 2012 at 11:46 pm

    @porter:

    groupie.

    You wish.

  50. 50.

    Brachiator

    March 30, 2012 at 11:49 pm

    @R Johnston:

    Politicians suck. They’re morons.

    I will keep this in mind while we wait for angels on unicorns to run for public office.

    Apart from this Penn is just emitting nervous gas while we wait for the Supreme Court decision. All the pundits are saying that it will come in June, and might be a political gift to Romney and the GOP.

    I think that the nation got lucky that Penn ran such a crappy campaign, and spared us the prospect of a Hillary Clinton presidency. I appreciate her service as senator, but think she has been at best an adequate secretary of state.

  51. 51.

    Joseph Nobles

    March 31, 2012 at 12:03 am

    The longer title for this piece at Kaplan is, “Could defeat for Obamacare mean victory for Obama?” So judging it solely based on the shorter title is probably premature.

    But on reading through most of it, it’s pretty clueless. It starts off being an OK summary of the past, and then throws out a shoutout to Penn’s idea of 10-year terms for the SCOTUS (OK, Mark, we get it), and then veers off into stupidity.

    Anyone who doesn’t see that overturning the individual mandate takes a weapon against Romney out of the President’s hand and sharpens Romney’s weapons against the President is stupid or selling you something. Romney gets to go to 11 about this Anti-Constitutional President and President Obama can’t make Mitt Romney run against Romneycare anymore.

    I mean, Penn actually says this:

    Would (Romney) turn against his own program if the court ruled against such a mandate?

    Ahem. HE ALREADY HAS.

  52. 52.

    Tom W

    March 31, 2012 at 12:08 am

    PUMAs are a myth – maybe there were several dozen in like 2008. There are virtually none now. I hate when this strange idea gets perpetuated.

  53. 53.

    handy

    March 31, 2012 at 12:08 am

    @kwAwk:

    Wouldn’t moving to the center in this case have to mean moving from the right?

    Or maybe Mark Penn is a complete bozo. Yeah maybe that.

  54. 54.

    AxelFoley

    March 31, 2012 at 12:13 am

    @R Johnston:

    Politicians suck. They’re morons. There may be exceptions, but Obama is not among them.

    LOL

    STFU, bitch.

  55. 55.

    Corner Stone

    March 31, 2012 at 12:19 am

    @Brachiator:

    I appreciate her service as senator, but think she has been at best an adequate secretary of state.

    You slip into the morass of stupidity further with every post.
    Please continue Maestro.

    I mean, you do realize who’s orders she’s following as SoS, right? Or are you one of those inexhaustible morans who thinks she’s gone rogue and Obama is powerless to can her because of the wave of Mongols who would siege the WH.
    Fuck off.

  56. 56.

    Corner Stone

    March 31, 2012 at 12:21 am

    @handy: I’m really trying to understand all this DougJ inspired kerfluffle.
    The ACA is essentially a right leaning plan.
    How the F does it get to the center from here?

  57. 57.

    Corner Stone

    March 31, 2012 at 12:22 am

    @David Koch:

    when mandates are a Heritage Foundation’s idea

    I’m sorry Mike Kay, what was this again?

  58. 58.

    Brachiator

    March 31, 2012 at 2:57 am

    @Corner Stone:

    You slip into the morass of stupidity further with every post.
    Please continue Maestro.

    It is good to see that you’re keeping count.

    I mean, you do realize who’s orders she’s following as SoS, right? Or are you one of those inexhaustible morans who thinks she’s gone rogue and Obama is powerless to can her because of the wave of Mongols who would siege the WH.

    On the other hand, here you continue to demonstrate an inability to string coherent thoughts together. How does my saying that she has been merely adequate lead to any notion of her going rogue, or not following orders?

    Obama did replace a largely lackluster Secretary of Commerce, but he encountered the typical stupid GOP opposition in getting a replacement in. I’d like to see new faces in Treasury, State, and Labor.

    Now, if you want to pull your head out of your butt and make a case for Secretary Clinton’s accomplishments in her current post, that would be the start of a discussion. Otherwise, you should just crawl back into your hole and try to calm down.

  59. 59.

    Keith G

    March 31, 2012 at 7:37 am

    I’m giving Obama a pass on Larry Summers, so I guess I’ll also give Hillary a pass on Penn.

  60. 60.

    Lawnguylander

    March 31, 2012 at 7:59 am

    @Brachiator:

    Leaving the other two aside, why would you want to replace Hilda Solis? She’s probably his best appointment.

  61. 61.

    Corner Stone

    March 31, 2012 at 9:36 am

    @Brachiator: You offered a moronic opinion and I suggested that you are, in fact, a moron.
    Pretty coherent string, it would appear. Except to a moran such as yourself.

  62. 62.

    Brachiator

    March 31, 2012 at 11:42 am

    @Corner Stone: You keep operating under the misapprehension that your weak snark is intelligent commentary. I really don’t know why you bother. Everybody is on to your game.

  63. 63.

    Triassic Sands

    March 31, 2012 at 12:22 pm

    …how do you defend her putting Mark Penn in charge of her campaign?

    I think with virtually all “mainstream” Democrats you have to hold your nose at some point. Virtually all of them eventually hang out with or appoint some pretty unpleasant characters.

  64. 64.

    Brachiator

    March 31, 2012 at 12:42 pm

    @Lawnguylander:

    Leaving the other two aside, why would you want to replace Hilda Solis? She’s probably his best appointment.

    Based on what? Serious question, not snark.

    I would have liked to have seen Commerce and Labor come up with innovative solutions to creating jobs, and balancing the macro economics focus coming from Treasury. Neither Gary Locke (first Secretary of Commerce) nor Hilda Solis (at Labor) provided much in the way of anything in this regard.

  65. 65.

    Joe Bohemouth

    March 31, 2012 at 7:28 pm

    @Brachiator: Jeeziz Christ. It’s one thing to expect magical bully pulpit pony-conjuring from the president, but seriously, from mix-matched island of broken toys departments like labor and commerce? Wow.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - dmkingto - SF Bay Area Scenes 3
Image by dmkingto (6/18/25)

Recent Comments

  • bbleh on All the News That’s Fit To Print Open Thread (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:08pm)
  • Baud on All the News That’s Fit To Print Open Thread (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:02pm)
  • Jackie on All the News That’s Fit To Print Open Thread (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:02pm)
  • jonas on All the News That’s Fit To Print Open Thread (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:02pm)
  • cmorenc on All the News That’s Fit To Print Open Thread (Jun 18, 2025 @ 1:57pm)

Personality Crisis Podcast (Cole, DougJ, mistermix)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!