I fully support this:
For three years now, Compañeros, a small nonprofit organization in rural southwestern Colorado, has received thousands of dollars from the Roman Catholic Church to help poor Hispanic immigrants with basic needs including access to health care and guidance on local laws.
But in February, the group was informed by a representative from the Diocese of Pueblo that its financing from the Catholic Campaign for Human Development, an arm of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops devoted to ending poverty, was in danger.
The problem, the diocesan liaison explained, was Compañeros’s membership in an immigrant rights coalition that had joined forces with a statewide gay and lesbian advocacy group, recounted Nicole Mosher, Compañeros’s executive director.
The Catholic Campaign, which doles out $8 million annually to about 250 groups nationwide, has been under increasing pressure from conservative Catholic groups to ensure that it is not unwittingly aiding organizations that run afoul of church positions on issues like birth control and marriage. While the amount lost is often relatively small, it can account for a significant chunk of a group’s budget. And it is not happening in a vacuum, coming at a time when other nonprofit organizations, like Planned Parenthood, also find themselves under fire from social conservatives trying to choke off their financing.
The fanatics are dead set on proving to everyone who and what they are. In the past, people would make excuses because of all “the good the Church does,” but now, with the lunatics firmly in control, they are making sure they alienate everyone who doesn’t live up to their 14th century standards. It’s great, from my perspective, because anything that alienates these fanatics and thier silly dogma is great news, imho, and even better, I don’t even have to do anything. They are doing it themselves.
So keep on with the purification, wingnut religionists.
I’ll make some phone calls tomorrow to find out how we can donate to Compañeros.
cathyx
And Latinos are overwhelmingly Catholic. Maybe that will change.
some guy
we are in
Egg Berry
Is this one of those threads?
Calming Influence
Plowshares into money bombs. I’m in.
dmsilev
The conservative Catholics really are brainstorming for new and impressive ways to be assholes, aren’t they? I’m pretty sure we’re only a few months away from “you once talked to a gay person, therefore you are Unclean.”.
El Cid
“Liberation theology” — i.e., Catholic leaders who actually gave a shit about not just the condition “of” but the self-directed will of the poor — was targeted for elimination by both a reactionary Catholic hierarchy and its allies in the Reagan administration / Cold War consensus, in the 1970s and 1980s and 1990s by the bloodiest means possible.
We shouldn’t be surprised that a hierarchy devoted to the subtle and occasionally overt encouragement of the slaughtering of priests and nuns among the Brown People World gets motivated to use their tactical advantage to attack anyone in the church’s structure who seems vulnerable in their 21st century non-revanchist outlook.
Joseph Nobles
This is them:
http://www.sanjuancitizens.org/loscompaneros/whoweare.shtml
This is their donation page:
http://www.sanjuancitizens.org/otherpages/donate.shtml
I apologize. The donation page is of an umbrella group they are a part of. I don’t know if that’s the tie that the Catholic Bishops are up in arms about.
RSA
I see that Catholic leaders have lost their moral compass: Let he who has never covered up sexual molestation of children cast the first stone.
fasteddie9318
But the laity is the real Church, stop slandering all Catholics, don’t condemn the whole Church for the actions of a few, blah blah. No True Scotsman, etc.
Schlemizel
And this is example 63,931 why private charity will never be an adequate replacement for government assistance.
If my church had a thing against root canal because it violated our cosmic muffins rules then we would refuse to help a starving child if it might in anyway be even marginally make it possible for someone somewhere to get a root canal. Its just sad
beergoggles
/flex
We gays are just that powerful.
fasteddie9318
@El Cid: Well, shit, you can’t have clergy going around telling the poor that it’s OK to demand a better lot in this world! They’re supposed to quietly accept their misery because it’ll all be cool in the next world, or the one after that, or whatever. Besides, it starts with the poor browns thinking they should have rights and dignity, and the next thing you know the kids are demanding not to be buggered anymore, and you’ve got total chaos.
Schlemizel
“That which you do for the least of these, my children . . . WTF!? they share resources with queers? Ah frack ’em!”
– GOP JAY-zuz
Abstruse
And the meek shall inherit something or another.
Joseph Nobles
From the article:
They are definitely demonstrating to all concerned why the separation of church and state is one of the best ideas the founders of this country had.
Spaghetti Lee
Makes me sad. Angry, but mostly sad. Why do right-wing nutjobs have to shit all over everything?
cathyx
Yes, Catholic Church, keep doing things like this and see how much more difficult than it already is to recruit potential priests. Keep it up and you won’t have anyone to lead your churches.
PhoenixRising
@Joseph Nobles: The CIRC is the sponsoring org that holds the funds for Comapneros and a number of other programs serving SW CO immigrants.
They’re presumably the source of the other half of the funding that Catholic Charities is taking away $30K of. My sister’s church does partnership work with CIRC, in the form of getting the Boulder hippies to pitch in money and door knocking for specific issue campaigns. I can vouch for that group.
They are the ones who allied with the One Colorado campaign, which is the rub–they’re also hardworking volunteers, trying to make CO more inclusive for LGBT couples and our kids. IOW, anti-Catholic bigots and haters, as demonstrated by the outreach to immigrant rights groups and coalition with CIRC around some married same sex couples with mixed citizenship status.
We do this work because we want the bishops to cry bitter tears, and for no other reason, obviously.
Corner Stone
@Schlemizel: This is good. We should compile a kind of “Shorter GOP Jayzus”, or GOP Jayzus, decoded.
Jesse
@Schlemizel: heh. Nice one. Brings out the obvious deviation these guys’s behavior is from what they are preaching.
Uncle Glenny
These guys see cooties everywhere.
If DOMA gets overturned and the IRS adapts, they’ll get bent out of shape mingling their tax dollars…… Oh, wait…
Literalreddy
@Corner Stone:
Or we could collect Republican Jesus comics from General JC Christian at Jesus’ General (goes to his shop). Though he hasn’t putting up as many lately. Though check out the leper one, fits perfectly.
Steve in DC
Donations do not good people make. Take Goldman Sachs, who are now the corporate face of the Human Rights Campaign. It makes the HRC into a bunch of fuck heads that they’d associate with assholes like that.
Ditto with every organization that accepts church money. They are giving a good face to the church. I currently work in global health and church money is all fucking over the place. It’s complicated as all hell though. We mostly deal with maternal and infant mortality, and the church LOVES to deal in that area. HIV/AIDS though… gay people! The problem is that most HIV/AIDS in the regions we work in (Asia and Africa) is now among heterosexuals. But they always love to stipulate “we’ll give you the money, just no dealing with those gays”. I’ll note we don’t take that money.
To be fair though not all religious organizations are that full of shit, but the vast majority of them are. We don’t take the cash, and the people who do are enabling this. We should be more aggressive against non profits that flagrantly enable this sort of shit.
NotMax
Heliopause
In related news, the Pope reaffirmed that he’s right, everybody else is wrong, and Jesus was in love with huge, hierarchical institutions.
Steve in DC
@Spaghetti Lee
Catholics aren’t right wingers at all. Most Catholics are liberals. What you have to realize is that the “left” as it exists in America isn’t a true left and is fucked up. The faction that runs it is very socially liberal and full of “fuck the poor, anybody without a masters degree is a worthless pile of shit” types just like the right. The economically populist portion of it, is pretty damn ass backwards on social issues.
It’s the problem of having a big tent.
rageahol
@Steve in DC: what about unitarians? they seem like nice enough folks. can someone give me examples of this kind of bullshit from them?
David Koch
What ahoot.
They’re whinng about teh gay, while the Pope wears red Prada slippers and perfume and is never seen without his handsome “personal assistant”.
Spaghetti Lee
@Steve in DC:
No, I agree that not all Catholics are like this, I know a lot who aren’t. I’m just wondering how the right-wing fucks got in charge.
Jim, Foolish Literalist
@Spaghetti Lee: JP-2
Keithly
@Spaghetti Lee: Le *sigh*. This is too easy: follow the money.
sparrow
@Spaghetti, wonder no more:
http://www.asap-spssi.org/pdf/asap43.pdf
(pdf warning, but a must-read)
Mark S.
@Heliopause:
I didn’t know that particular nonsense was considered infallible.
He also chose Judas, which probably wasn’t his best decision ever.
scav
Matthew 12:9-14
New Ratzinger-RedBeanie Version (NRRBV)
(9) Going on from that place, he went into their synagogue, (10) and a man with a shriveled hand was there. Looking for a reason to bring charges against Jesus, they asked him, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?”
(11) He said to them, “If any of you has a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out? (12) How much more valuable is a person than a sheep! Therefore it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.”
(13) Then he said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” So he stretched it out. (14) He said unto him “Hold on, have you at any time spoken well or assisted any gay issue or spoken well of them? Has any money that ever touched your hand either upstream or downstream of the touch ever been spent to assist a gay or a woman that has not submitted in all things to our authority, whether she believes in us or no?” (15) “I cannot say,” said the man, “But it may very well be so.” (16) “Well then piss off, cripple.” said Jesus and strode out of the temple. (17) And the Pharisees were much reassured and ceased to plot how they might kill Jesus.
Silver
@Heliopause:
I hear he wants to add an armband to the uniform to go with the collar. Apparently he has some ideas from his youth…
Gex
The good they do is 2/3 taxpayer funded. I’d rather have a social safety net funded by that hat doesn’t proselytize of hate on gays for sport.
Members get privatized benefits of the RCC. The costs are externalized, abused kids, gays, and women bearing the brunt of it.
shortstop
@cathyx: They will still have priests, but even fewer of them, and the ones they’ll get will be the most twisted, emotionally dysfunctional, exploitative, self-justifying, knee-jerk authoritarian societal misfits imaginable.
Jay in Oregon
@Mark S.:
Depends on who you ask, methinks:
http://www.gospelassemblyfree.com/facts/women.htm
Gex
@cathyx: Worse. They loudly demonstrate they will go to the mat for pedos. Guess where pedos might want to work? Some place they’ll be 99% sure they’ll never be caught by secular authorities.
shortstop
@scav: That’s some tasty work right there.
Lojasmo
@Spaghetti Lee:
Papism.
Mark S.
@shortstop:
Isn’t that pretty much what they have right now?
Petorado
So the essence of the Church is now boiled down to being “whatever hates on teh Gay, updated daily.”
And all this time I thought they were about “love thy neighbour as thyself.” Well, fool me twice — won’t get fooled again.
nellcote
So I guess they’re gonna loose their shit when the dems add a marriage equality plank to the convention platform.
mainmati
@cathyx: It already is changing. Since at least the 1980s, extreme Protestant fundamentalists have been down in Central America converting Guatemalans, Hondurans and others. Eventually, at least some of them will end up here, adding to the Talibanization of America.
PIGL
@Lojasmo:
Priapapism.
FIFY.
Joseph Nobles
@Mark S.: And the person he chose to tell the apostles about his Resurrection? Mary Magdelena.
mainmati
@Spaghetti Lee: Well, as someone who grew up Catholic (but who is lapsed) and who also works in developing countries, I’m sure you know there is a huge divide between the lower clergy: priests, brothers and nuns and the upper clergy: bishops, cardinals and Il Papa. The latter are, for the most part, reactionary (Cardinal Sin (my favorite name) and Archbishop Romero being rare exceptions). John Paul II, the Polish anti-Communist shut down liberation theology and other activist Church doctrine to help the poor and then really solidified the modern Church’s political conservatism. There are a lot of good Catholic clerical and lay activists still working with the poor and the politically marginalized but they get no recognition from the hierarchy.
Citizen_X
@Steve in DC:
I will see you in court for the case of “How the hell did we end up here?” whiplash that that gave me.
Mnemosyne
@mainmati:
Yep — Father Greg Boyle is never going to be a monsignor or a bishop.
Citizen Alan
@Mark S.:
What horseshit! Slacktivist talked about this just a few months ago. In the Book of Romans, the Apostle Paul specifically identified the woman Junia as someone who had been an apostle before he was, and the fucking Catholic Church changed her name and has been falsely identifying her as a man named Junius for the last 1100 years rather than admit that there were woman leaders in the Early Church!
Mark S.
@Joseph Nobles:
Well, yeah, the Apostles were all busy hiding.
Or maybe they were covering up some molestation charges.
Mnemosyne
@Citizen Alan:
IIRC, they’ve found paintings of early church “patriarchs” that were painted over with beards and masculine clothing to conceal the fact that they were originally paintings of women.
Chris
@mainmati:
Based on my recollections from Cuba, you’re correct. The priests, nuns and other local Catholic organizations were good people, many of whom seemed to genuinely care about their congregations and agitated for change on their behalf. The nuncio and his bosses back at the Vatican, OTOH, truly couldn’t care less and are guided mainly by “don’t upset Castro.”
Jim, Foolish Literalist
this reminds me, a small Catholic college in MA invited Victoria Kennedy (Ted’s widow) to speak at their commencement, and then disinvited her under pressure from the Archbishop of Boston
Mnemosyne
Slacktivist has the story of a Catholic high school assembly that the bishop called to defend “traditional marriage.”
It did not go the way he thought it would.
Little Boots
the church needs to do itself a huge favor and stfu about gayness for about 20 years. then, come back and pretend it never said anything at all.
this is how a 2000 year old institution gets by. it’s worked over and over and over again.
it’s actually pretty simple.
Little Boots
@Mnemosyne:
flexibility.
always the key.
Bago
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: Jet fuel?
Bago
@shortstop: It’s a matter of faith.
Mayken
@Schlemizel: This! A thousand times this.
AA+ Bonds
I’m not sure they all agree with you here in America, gringo
AA+ Bonds
@Steve in DC:
LOL
AA+ Bonds
Thread called for Steve in DC
AA+ Bonds
I mean Christ almighty you people are just begging for it
Rogers
Splendid! Is there an actively revanchist faction of the beanie brigade I can donate to? Since the Dead Enders seem hellbent to “Burn Down the Mission” I’d be eager to chip in some gas money. Always keen on “giving back”.
Jesse
@scav: That’s just fantastic. “Strode” made me think of “rode”, and this variation of your text:
Robert
Is it really that big a surprise that, now that the pope is the man whose job it was to strictly adhere to the letter–not the intent–of every Catholic rule, the Church is going uber conservative right now? That’s what he was trained to do. When he drops dead in a couple years, they’ll elect another pope who has the chance to update those infallible policies. “Infallible” in the pope’s speech means, in context, this pope doesn’t care to rewrite that rule. It was infallible at one point that Catholic parishioners would not be allowed to own and read their own copy of the Bible because Jesus held all the teachings himself.
I’m Catholic. I do not agree with where the church is going right now. Neither do my two local priests, who add commentary to all the ridiculous new translations and stringent rules during services and lead us in prayer for a better direction for the goals of the church. For example, one of the priests turns off his microphone during funeral services so that he can add in a prayer based on personal interaction with the deceased for the grieving family (walking right up to them, shaking their hands, giving them hugs, etc.), even though newly released church documents basically say “stick to the script, it’s not your place to comfort the families.” We actually do a lot of good for the local community, such as running the largest food kitchen in the area. Our nuns run nursing homes and our parishioners are working hard to put together youth groups.
The only way I can explain how the relationship between parishioners and the pope works is this. The US has a president. He is elected through an electoral college system that doesn’t account for everyone’s votes or desires. Yet, as leader of the United States, we–as US citizens–are expected to respect him. We can disagree with his policies. We can campaign for change. We can follow our own beliefs so long as we’re not doing harm to other people. Now substitute president for pope, electoral college for cardinals, and US citizens for Catholics. Unless you really think that every US citizen is terrible because [insert terrible policy, like unjust wars here], you’re applying bias reasoning to how people should or should not support any large hierarchic organization they belong to.
Do you really think that there is no room to question or discuss what the president says? That “well, it’s law now so it will never change” is the truth? Change takes time and our nazi pope is out of the position that made it so more liberal popes like John Paul II couldn’t reform social issues as much as they would like. He is, after all, the pope who added “infallible” rules about animal rights and environmental protection to a church that for centuries essentially said “do what you want, God gave it to you to destroy.”
floridafrog
@rageahol
Here’s what the Unitarians are up to on these topics:
1) LGBT, women and people of color at all levels of leadership
2) allied with immigrants’ rights groups – working hard to repeal laws like SB1070 in AZ
3) speak out for full reproductive freedom – some congregations have a mission to escort and protect women seeking abortions at Planned Parenthood clinics
4) lobby for and advocate in many ways for marriage equality
Rafer Janders
@Mark S.:
T
To be more acccurate, he willingly chose only Jewish men. So if we were to keep to his wishes, that’s the pool of potential recruits to the Catholic priesthood we’d have to fish in….
Woodrowfan
@Mnemosyne: great story! thank you for linking to it…
Karmicjay
Read this article with increasing dismay. Look forward to your post about how we can help.
Long time lurker here btw.
elftx
I now refer to them as the catholic Pedo ring..since I am almost convinced this so called church has been this way from the start.
someofparts
Interesting, don’t you think, that religious extremism surged just when feminists started to make real gains for women.
The feminists said the church had a history of stomping on women, but I didn’t believe them. Then the fanatics proved them right.
Mary Daly was right, and got sacked for the presumption.
So now thirty years later we get around to noticing that the the churches are pretty, oh … satanic. Ya think?
Who would imagine that the heirs to holocaust measures against pagan female clergy, aka the Inquisition, would turn out to be bad faith actors?
Kind of like imagining that the heirs to slave owners would promote economic policies that turn 99% of us into virtual sharecroppers. Only unreasonable people would suppose such a thing!
Jay C
@shortstop:
“Will” get?
Seriously. what does the RCC think they are going to get out of ramping up this sort of crap – what? Cutting off funding for any organization or charity that dares associate in any wise with Teh Evil Icky Gheys? Have they never even considered the notion that – in the US, anyway – restricting their support for otherwise worthy causes via ideological or theological prejudices is going to be more likely to alienate them from what passes for a “mainstream” in this country? And probably not harm their supposed “targets” all that much?
DavidTC
I have to agree with the Catholic church: Only people of the gender selected to positions in the early church should be allowed to hold that position now.
I now await them removing all _male_ deacons, as the only individual listed in the entire Bible as a ‘diakonos’ in a church is, in fact, a ‘Phoebe’, a name which was the same gender then as it is now. This of course proves that men are not eligible for that position.
Alan
@Calming Influence:
thank you for a frank and open discussion (mostly)
you can help Companeros and the fight against this misguided move by the CCHD, by donating here- http://withcharityforall.org