• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Spilling the end game before they can coat it in frankl luntz-approved dogwhistles.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

He really is that stupid.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

We still have time to mess this up!

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

DeSantis transforms Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

Bark louder, little dog.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

How can republicans represent us when they don’t trust women?

No Justins, No Peace

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

Everybody saw this coming.

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2012 / Fiscal Frauds

Fiscal Frauds

by John Cole|  April 16, 20124:15 pm| 71 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012, Tax Policy, Blatant Liars and the Lies They Tell, Decline and Fall

FacebookTweetEmail

Of course he is just making shit up:

A big mystery of Romney’s tax pledge — to “cut tax rates across the board by 20 percent” and reduce the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent — is what tax loopholes he’ll close to pay for the cost.

Romney’s tax cuts are projected to cost the federal government $5 trillion over 10 years, on top of the $4 trillion 10-year cost of making the Bush tax cuts permanent. Existing deductions and exemptions in the tax code, all together, reduce receipts by about $1 trillion per year, according to estimates.

Chuck Marr, director of federal tax policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said all the deductions Romney proposed to scrap “would pay for less than 20 percent” of the $5 trillion cost of his tax plan. “The deductions he unveiled would raise less than $1 trillion,” he said.

Romney’s mortgage interest proposal would yield “probably less than 1 percent of the total cost” of his tax cuts, Marr said, while axing the state and local deduction for everyone, which would be very difficult to enact politically, would yield about $800 billion to $900 billion over 10 years. “So that’d be a major step but still pay for a small share of his tax cuts,” Marr said.

It’s unclear whether Romney would eliminate these expenditures entirely or simply cap them, to limit the extent to which they benefit high-income earners.

The deductibility of home mortgage interest and the tax exemption for employer-provided health care eat up a big chunk of the $1 trillion in revenue the government loses annually because of tax expenditures. Both are very popular politically, and they’ve become fundamental to the country’s housing and health care policy. Other perks, like the low capital gains rate and oil and gas subsidies, are backed by powerful constituencies that both parties, but particularly Republicans, are at pains to scale back.

The Romney campaign backed away from the remarks Monday morning, suggesting they’re aware the bad math could become a political liability. “He was just discussing ideas that came up on the campaign trail,” Romney surrogate Jim Talent told reporters on a conference call Monday. “He wasn’t announcing a policy yesterday. We don’t have any plans now to announce new policies.”

It’s not a big mystery at all. He’s lying.

How many more decades do we have to pretend the Republicans are fiscally responsible?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Some Jesusland Public Art
Next Post: Wanker of the Decade, 2nd and 1st Runners-Up. »

Reader Interactions

71Comments

  1. 1.

    Culture of Truth

    April 16, 2012 at 4:19 pm

    A big mystery of Romney’s

    According to the latest meme, this language is code for an anti-Mormon slur.

    John Cole ‘with ties to the white house’ will cause a ‘firestorm’ and David Gregory will devote his show to ‘Democratic attacks on people of faith’.

  2. 2.

    Dork

    April 16, 2012 at 4:19 pm

    Romney’s mortgage interest proposal

    If he messes with this MI deductions, people will crucify him. Of course, he wont care, because it only affects the middle class.

  3. 3.

    Tonal Crow

    April 16, 2012 at 4:21 pm

    Other perks, like the low capital gains rate and oil and gas subsidies, are backed by powerful constituencies that both parties, but particularly Republicans, are at pains to scale back preserve and expand at the expense of everyone else.

    Fixed.

  4. 4.

    Tonal Crow

    April 16, 2012 at 4:22 pm

    @Culture of Truth: It’s the Liberals’ War on Brigham Young!

  5. 5.

    Zandar

    April 16, 2012 at 4:23 pm

    “He wasn’t announcing a policy yesterday. We don’t have any plans now to announce new policies.”

    Nor will he until 2013. We’ll just have to elect him to find out what his policies actually are.

  6. 6.

    Violet

    April 16, 2012 at 4:23 pm

    How many more decades do we have to pretend the Republicans are fiscally responsible?

    However long it takes for our media overlords to stop inking million dollar contracts and make salaries somewhat more in the range of what normal people make.

    When that happens they’ll be much less interested in making sure they pay lower taxes and much more interested in making sure the middle class quits getting screwed. And magically, Republicans will suddenly become fiscally irresponsible.

  7. 7.

    Eric S.

    April 16, 2012 at 4:23 pm

    While I understand he’s just making this up has anyone asked Mittens why actual human beings only deserve a 20% decrease and corporations deserve a 29% decrease?

  8. 8.

    Punchy

    April 16, 2012 at 4:24 pm

    It’s unclear whether Romney would eliminate these expenditures entirely or simply cap them, to limit the extent to which they benefit high-income earners.

    Am I reading that bolded part correct? They expect rich-ass Romney to limit interest deductions for rich people? They expect Romney to consider “raising” taxes on the wealthy by limiting their deductions?

    Are the media really this fucking obtuse?

  9. 9.

    BGinCHI

    April 16, 2012 at 4:24 pm

    What kind of Master of the Universe gives a shit about debt?

    Debt is for little people who pay their bills, cook their own meals, clean their own houses, raise their own kids.

    Mitt gives the stupidest among us something to strive for: no labor, no responsibility, no guilt.

  10. 10.

    Corner Stone

    April 16, 2012 at 4:24 pm

    Recent comments.

  11. 11.

    Satanicpanic

    April 16, 2012 at 4:24 pm

    @Culture of Truth: As is referring to him as weird, unnerving, or off-putting. Because his religion is the only reason why people would do that.

  12. 12.

    BGinCHI

    April 16, 2012 at 4:24 pm

    @Eric S.: Because motherfucking corporations are people, my friend.

  13. 13.

    cathyx

    April 16, 2012 at 4:26 pm

    He’s lying? So what. Nobody who could call him out cares if he does.

  14. 14.

    Mickey

    April 16, 2012 at 4:26 pm

    “How many more decades do we have to pretend the Republicans are fiscally responsible?”

    You seemed to think so only a couple years ago….oh and it was only a few months ago you were spunking on the ceiling over Greewalds libertarian diatribes.

    So….you were saying Cole?

  15. 15.

    Mickey

    April 16, 2012 at 4:26 pm

    “How many more decades do we have to pretend the Republicans are fiscally responsible?”

    You seemed to think so only a couple years ago….oh and it was only a few months ago you were spunking on the ceiling over Greenwalds libertarian diatribes.

    So….you were saying Cole?

  16. 16.

    Culture of Truth

    April 16, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    @Eric S.: Some people are more equal than others.

  17. 17.

    Eric S.

    April 16, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    @BGinCHI: While I know the case law, make Mittens say that. Make him say it again and again and again…

  18. 18.

    Culture of Truth

    April 16, 2012 at 4:29 pm

    @Eric S.: Corporations are people, but have more people than regular people, so they deserve a bigger tax cut.

  19. 19.

    danimal

    April 16, 2012 at 4:30 pm

    “How many more decades do we have to pretend the Republicans are fiscally responsible?”

    Until the writers in the mainstream press begin to understand very basic, very simple mathematical equations along with rudimentary budgeting terminology.

    IOW, many, many decades. Idiots. It’s truly disgraceful.

  20. 20.

    Cris (without an H)

    April 16, 2012 at 4:30 pm

    Why is he talking of closing loopholes at all? I thought the GOP article of faith was that if you decrease corporate taxes, the economy improves, thus increasing tax revenue.

    Kind of an underpants gnome thing.

  21. 21.

    pragmatism

    April 16, 2012 at 4:33 pm

    @Tonal Crow: you know who actually waged war on brigham young? honest abe lincoln. he placed the gun batteries which face SLC.

  22. 22.

    Culture of Truth

    April 16, 2012 at 4:34 pm

    Why is he talking of closing loopholes at all?

    Cause it sounds good. ‘loopholes’ are by definition a bad thing, so it’s like saying ‘i’m against bad stuff and for good stuff’

    which is kind of the GOP platform anyway.

  23. 23.

    bemused

    April 16, 2012 at 4:35 pm

    It’s a given that he’s lying every time he opens his mouth. I don’t know how these churchy people, no matter what religion they follow, square this with their God(s). Make it up, even their religions, as they go along is the only explanation.

  24. 24.

    gbear

    April 16, 2012 at 4:37 pm

    The Romney campaign backed away from the remarks Monday morning

    It wasn’t meant to be a factual statement.

  25. 25.

    burnspbesq

    April 16, 2012 at 4:38 pm

    The entire discussion about tax policy, from both sides, is fundamentally silly. Unless you’re willing to talk about rates, you’re not serious about deficit reduction. It simply can’t be done by dicking around with the base. And unless you’re willing to invade and annex Ireland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Singapore, and the Cayman Islands, forget about the corporate income tax as a source of any significant revenue increases.

    There was a recent study by a couple of academic economists, the math of which made sense to me, that posited that the revenue-optimizing top marginal individual income tax rate is around 70 percent.

    If we’re serious about closing the budget gap, we need a much more steeply progressive individual income tax, both for the revenue it raises directly and to offset the regressivity of the VAT that we’re going to have to have.

  26. 26.

    jwb

    April 16, 2012 at 4:38 pm

    @Culture of Truth: ” John Cole ‘with ties to the white house’ will cause a ‘firestorm’ and David Gregory will devote his show to ‘Democratic attacks on people of faith’.”

    Cole will be promoted: “close White House advisor John Cole…”

  27. 27.

    Heliopause

    April 16, 2012 at 4:39 pm

    what tax loopholes he’ll close to pay for the cost.

    It doesn’t matter, because the minute you flatten the tax rate and close loopholes Romney’s buddies will commence introducing new loopholes into the tax code. This is an absolute certainty. Death is less certain than this.

    The only hope for this country is to push up the marginal rates as far as can be managed and make the oligarchs whittle them down from there. A flatter tax only makes sense in the quantum universe where the U.S. political system is not a wholly owned subsidiary of wealthy interests.

    How many more decades do we have to pretend the Republicans are fiscally responsible?

    Five. The Empire will collapse at that point.

  28. 28.

    danimal

    April 16, 2012 at 4:43 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    And unless you’re willing to invade and annex Ireland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Singapore, and the Cayman Islands, forget about the corporate income tax as a source of any significant revenue increases.

    It’s about damned time we invade some nice vacation spots. Much better list than Baghdad, Kuwait City and Tehran, if you ask me.

  29. 29.

    Corner Stone

    April 16, 2012 at 4:50 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    Unless you’re willing to talk about rates, you’re not serious about deficit reduction.

    Shit. Unless you’re seriously willing to put the army of fucking leeches like you out of business then nothing will ever happen with actual tax reform.

  30. 30.

    Keith

    April 16, 2012 at 4:58 pm

    Is it me or did it sound like Team Meh tried to blame his supporters for coming up with his not-plan? “Hey, we’re just discussing what these nutjobs throw at us!”

  31. 31.

    Amir Khalid

    April 16, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    @danimal:
    Maybe it’s me just being a Malaysian, but since when is Singapore a nice vacation spot? It’s all city, aside from a few fancy tourist-trap resorts. Singaporeans come north of the Causeway when they want to see countryside and shit stuff.

  32. 32.

    burnspbesq

    April 16, 2012 at 5:01 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    put the army of fucking leeches like you out of business

    Be careful what you wish for. I’ll take your job and be better at it on my first day than you’ve ever been.

  33. 33.

    Culture of Truth

    April 16, 2012 at 5:01 pm

    “He was just discussing ideas that came up on the campaign trail,” Romney surrogate Jim Talent told reporters on a conference call Monday. “He wasn’t announcing a policy yesterday. We don’t have any plans now to announce new policies.”

    I suggest the Romney 2012 Campaign be renamed “Operation Slippery Weasel”

  34. 34.

    burnspbesq

    April 16, 2012 at 5:05 pm

    @Amir Khalid:

    I remember being in the lobby of a hotel in New York a few years ago when a busload of Singapore Airlines flight attendants came in. If they’re all from Singapore, I can imagine Singapore being pretty scenic.

  35. 35.

    Roger Moore

    April 16, 2012 at 5:05 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    And unless you’re willing to invade and annex Ireland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Singapore, and the Cayman Islands, forget about the corporate income tax as a source of any significant revenue increases.

    I’ve been saying for a while that if the Neocons are right and we need to throw some pissant country against the wall once a decade to show the world who’s boss, we could to a lot worse than choosing one of the off-shore tax havens. The Cayman Islands are a hell of a lot less likely to turn into a never-ending quagmire than Iraq, and knocking them off might actually help our economy.

  36. 36.

    Zach

    April 16, 2012 at 5:09 pm

    Someone needs to write up Romney’s proposals and yell really loudly that he’s proposing to raise taxes for job creators and whatnot. Axing the state and local deduction would hit most small businesses much more than a new upper bracket for folks with taxable income over $1M/year.

    The story shouldn’t be that Romney didn’t propose raising taxes enough to offset his cuts. It should be that he proposed raising taxes on everyone else to pay for some of his massive tax cuts for the rich. How did someone at CBPP get quoted without pointing out who Romney’s tax cuts are actually going to?

  37. 37.

    Mickey

    April 16, 2012 at 5:09 pm

    @Roger Moore: How about Barbados. It’s got lost of blahs so it would be a twofer.

  38. 38.

    Roger Moore

    April 16, 2012 at 5:09 pm

    @Amir Khalid:

    Maybe it’s me just being a Malaysian, but since when is Singapore a nice vacation spot?

    It’s great if you want to visit The Tackiest Place on Earth. And it ought to be a real destination for serious foodies.

  39. 39.

    Phoenix_rising

    April 16, 2012 at 5:14 pm

    while axing the state and local deduction for everyone, which would be very difficult to enact politically,

    Yeah, that’s torches and pitchforks’ talk.

    I pay for better roads in frickin’ Wyoming than Wyoming can afford thanks to my gas taxes going into a federal highways pool. Even though the state has negligible property taxes, and NO income tax which is a hallmark of States That Are Free Ridin’ On The Rest of Us, Wyoming owns more transportation infrastructure to inform drivers (signs that can upload traffic info over the freeway) than New Mexico. With 30% of the population and less area.

    Now we’re seriously suggesting that I should pay income tax in the state where I live, and then pay federal income tax on that very same $3500 to transfer more of my hard earned information worker dollars to the yahoos in Missabama to use on faith based sex ed?

    Nah, that’s a non-starter. The ignorant states are already fleecing the rest of us.

  40. 40.

    TooManyJens

    April 16, 2012 at 5:18 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    I’ll take your job and be better at it on my first day than you’ve ever been.

    Do you eat what you kill, too?

  41. 41.

    Martin

    April 16, 2012 at 5:19 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    Unless you’re willing to talk about rates, you’re not serious about deficit reduction. It simply can’t be done by dicking around with the base.

    I don’t agree. I posted the other day that our effective rate on nearly $100K of income for last year is a teahadist-crushing 0.98%. The rate we pay is effectively zero, so talking about rate seems fairly pointless.

    We got to 0.98% by reducing our AGI by ⅔ through mortgage interest deductions, deductions for taxes, deductions for children, and for everything else under the sun. Our AGI was then so low that we got the 0% cap gains rate on the $30K+ of cap gains that we took. I don’t know if we talk about that as a rate exemption or a rate, but even if we paid 15% on that long-term gain, it’d only have brought our effective rate to 5%.

    It’s absurd that in addition to the property tax deduction that I get to reduce my income by a third simply because I pay mortgage interest while the guy across the street who rents the same model home as me doesn’t get that benefit. And because of those deductions, it doesn’t matter what the rate is because apparently I can avoid damn near any rate that I don’t want to pay. And that’s the problem with corporate taxation as well. 35% or 39% makes no difference when the only people that pay that rate are athletes and entertainers.

  42. 42.

    LanceThruster

    April 16, 2012 at 5:23 pm

    I want the Mormon prophet to weigh in on whether Mittens can be an LDS in “good standing” while at the same time spewing lie after brazen lie.

    (sadly – my guess is “yes”).

  43. 43.

    Martin

    April 16, 2012 at 5:25 pm

    @Phoenix_rising:

    Yeah, that’s torches and pitchforks’ talk.

    I thought about that too, but I’m starting to change my mind. In general I don’t like compounding taxation because it has pretty awful outcomes – not the least of which being the possibility that you have more than 100% of your income being taxed, at least in theory. I prefer systems that don’t allow that sort of thing by design.

    But we all get a pretty hefty standard deduction, and I’d advocate for an even heftier one in exchange for losing all of the other deductions. Doesn’t that standard deduction already cover your state and local taxes and then some? In spite of states like Wyoming with no income or sales tax, I don’t see a lot of people flocking there. Clearly there’s some benefit being delivered with the higher taxation in the other states. And the deduction doesn’t level the playing field as it can only recoup at most 35% of what you pay to the state/locality, and generally closer to 15%. And yet people still live in high tax areas like NY and CA.

  44. 44.

    Ken

    April 16, 2012 at 5:30 pm

    @Roger Moore: we could to a lot worse than choosing one of the off-shore tax havens. The Cayman Islands…

    If it weren’t for the non-corporation people who live there, I might wish for a hurricane to wipe the islands out of existence. It would be instructive to see how much of that “offshore” money survived.

    (The whole idea of offshore accounts seems based on a child’s image of banks as giant Scrooge McDuck vaults filled with bills and coins.)

  45. 45.

    Svensker

    April 16, 2012 at 5:34 pm

    We don’t have any plans now to announce new policies.”

    If not now, when? The guy’s only been running for president since 2006 — don’t you think he’d have had time to come up with some “policies” on the most important items he’d have to deal with if he were presidentin’? Jayzus.

  46. 46.

    gaz

    April 16, 2012 at 5:34 pm

    Basically, a few decades ago the republicans decided to start schlepping bad fiscal ideas into the public sphere in order to drum up support for tanking the economy. The reason for this is quite simple. It’s a good way to dupe the rubes when a D-prez is in the whitehouse. Let congress screw everything up, and then next cycle, the duped electorate throws the “bum” out and replaces them with one of the vandals that was responsible for the mess in the first place.

    Unfortunately for them (not to mention the rest of us!) – now they have all drank their own kool-aid and they actually believe this economic magical thinking works. See the “Chicago School” of economics, Friedman, Laffer, et al. Bunch friggin loons.

  47. 47.

    Suffern ACE

    April 16, 2012 at 5:41 pm

    Wait. I thought it was fraud that was going to get us there. Not the two tax loopholes I have, plus the third if you count the tax deduction my employer takes because I get medical care. Next they’ll be telling me that I’ll be taxed on my 401K contributions. Unreasonable I tell you.

  48. 48.

    Suffern ACE

    April 16, 2012 at 5:43 pm

    @Svensker: What they mean is “unpopular policies” won’t be announced. Not in this context.

  49. 49.

    PurpleGirl

    April 16, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    @Martin: Standard deduction vs. itemizing deductions. For 30-odd years I’ve not actually filed with itemized deductions. I’ve often calculated them and then not filed that way. Even living in a Co-op now, my real estate taxes and my state/local taxes and everything else combined wouldn’t equal what the standard deduction is. I’ve had friends tell me I’m wrong not to itemize but I don’t see it in my numbers.

  50. 50.

    PurpleGirl

    April 16, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    @Suffern ACE: You’re not taxed on the 401(K) contributions when you make them but you will be when you take the money out. Theoretically when you are retired your income tax rate will be lower and the tax won’t be as much as now, but you will be taxed on the 402(K) money you take out. (And those of us who had to take out the 401(K) money to live on when unemployed… depending on you age you might not have to pay a penalty but we did have to pay income taxes.

  51. 51.

    Shari

    April 16, 2012 at 6:24 pm

    @LanceThruster:

    Mix “lying for the Lord” with the “white horse prophesy” and, yeah, I have no trouble believing the Mormon prophet thinks it is ok for Romney to lie to us.

  52. 52.

    pluege

    April 16, 2012 at 6:31 pm

    How many more decades do we have to pretend the Republicans are fiscally responsible?

    how many years do we have to pretend republicans aren’t congenital liars that lie with their every breath?

  53. 53.

    Judas Escargot, Your Postmodern Neighbor

    April 16, 2012 at 6:47 pm

    @Dork:

    If he [Romney] messes with this MI deductions, people will crucify him.

    You’re assuming MSM would report actual “facts” to the “voters”.

    The Ryan plan cancels the mortgage interest deduction as well, but no crucifixions have been forthcoming. Because nobody of importance has mentioned it.

  54. 54.

    MikeBoyScout

    April 16, 2012 at 6:50 pm

    The first step, any which way and every which way you look at it, is the elimination and liquidation of the Republican party.

  55. 55.

    Corner Stone

    April 16, 2012 at 6:51 pm

    @burnspbesq: Do you also not take a piss when you’re in a position? Know how to mow lawns? Wash the silver for other patrons?
    Shit. You couldn’t carry enough towels to keep me dry you silly motherfucker.

  56. 56.

    Corner Stone

    April 16, 2012 at 6:58 pm

    @burnspbesq: You’re a leech. A mooch. You haven’t produced a god damned thing for society. In fact, you’ve stolen from your community and your country at large. You hide behind the “loopholes as is” because that’s easy for you. All the while never acknowledging those loopholes and exceptions and rules exist for a reason. They were paid for!
    The people stealing their fair share out of the community pot took their profits and they paid for those loopholes! And fecking remora like you told them how to construct it.
    Don’t kid yourself homeboy.

  57. 57.

    LanceThruster

    April 16, 2012 at 7:11 pm

    @Shari:

    Wow. Thanks for that, Shari —

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Horse_Prophecy

  58. 58.

    Enhanced Voting Techniques

    April 16, 2012 at 7:14 pm

    Have we mentioned Ann Romney is a hard working mother of five in this thread?

  59. 59.

    Tonal Crow

    April 16, 2012 at 7:15 pm

    I had thought that Mormon doctrine considers lying — especially reprobate lying to gain power — to be a serious sin requiring confession, repentance, atonement, and a rigorous, continuous effort to refrain from further sin.

    Am I misinformed?

  60. 60.

    Tonal Crow

    April 16, 2012 at 7:19 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    Shit. Unless you’re seriously willing to put the army of fucking leeches like you out of business then nothing will ever happen with actual tax reform.

    Don’t overgeneralize. Some lawyers do awesome good work, for example these folks. Also too, if the police knock on your door, you’re going to run to a fucking leech lawyer like a rabbit on speed.

  61. 61.

    Corner Stone

    April 16, 2012 at 7:31 pm

    @Tonal Crow: Reading comprehension. Try it sometime.

  62. 62.

    Roger Moore

    April 16, 2012 at 7:43 pm

    @PurpleGirl:
    People like to talk about itemizing deductions, but it’s mostly important for people who are pretty well off. At the national median household income of about $45K, it would take a combination of a relatively high state and local tax rate and tithing to get a meaningful itemized deduction. You’re only likely to get there with some combination of those and the mortgage interest deduction or an income well above the median.

  63. 63.

    Roger Moore

    April 16, 2012 at 7:45 pm

    @PurpleGirl:
    People like to talk about itemizing deductions, but it’s mostly important for people who are pretty well off. At the national median household income of about $45K, it would take a combination of a relatively high state and local tax rate and tithing to get a meaningful itemized deduction. You’re only likely to get there with some combination of those and the mortgage interest deduction or an income well above the median.

  64. 64.

    PurpleGirl

    April 16, 2012 at 8:12 pm

    @Roger Moore: Yup. For most of my working life I didn’t make that kind of money and when I compared the totals of what I could itemize with the standards, hands down I did better to take the standard.

  65. 65.

    rikyrah

    April 16, 2012 at 8:28 pm

    they are frauds, yet, you still have delusional ones like Sully pretending that there’s anything to Willard’s proposal.

    then again, he called the Zombie-eyed Granny Killer (thanks Charles Pierce) ‘ a serious thinker’.

  66. 66.

    burnspbesq

    April 16, 2012 at 8:28 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    Bullshit, with a large side order of you have no fucking clue.

    I help people comply with the most fiendishly and unnecessarily complex law ever devised by man. All my clients want is to pay the right amount of tax (i.e., everything they are legally obligated to pay and not one dime more), to the right countries, at the right time.

    My clients pretty much don’t get audited, because there are no real issues on their returns. The ones that do get audited, get no-change letters at the end, because they were in compliance.

    And yes, I do add value. Because of me, you can rely on the accuracy of the tax provision in my public clients’ financial statements when deciding whether to invest in their stock.

    You really should just shut up. You’re embarrassing yourself.

  67. 67.

    tybee

    April 16, 2012 at 8:34 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    so corner stone is right. you’re a leech.

    additionally, you support child rapists with your financial “success”.

  68. 68.

    Corner Stone

    April 16, 2012 at 9:31 pm

    @burnspbesq: The net worth of your clients, on average, is?

  69. 69.

    Corner Stone

    April 16, 2012 at 9:37 pm

    @burnspbesq: I know everything there is to know about you counselor. From your days at the IRS until you leveraged them up for a place at BigLaw and now on your own.
    You’re the exact reason the twisted and “fiendish” laws exist as they are. Does the irony escape you in some way?
    You don’t help Mama figure out how to get $500 extra back without raising the flag.
    You help a bunch of overly wealthy pimps like yourself determine how to shield their whorehouse money from coming into the hands of the plebes they despise. The plebes who don’t have the time, experience or money to navigate the twisted and “fiendish” layers people like you have lobbied to put in place. Because those “fiendish” rules benefit you and others. Just like you.
    You’re no mystery.

  70. 70.

    Corner Stone

    April 16, 2012 at 9:51 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    And yes, I do add value. Because of me, you can rely on the accuracy of the tax provision in my public clients’ financial statements when deciding whether to invest in their stock.

    Bwah ha ha ha ha.
    I’ve seen that trick before. Public reporting is the gold standard!
    Oh, wait…

  71. 71.

    gaz

    April 17, 2012 at 12:06 pm

    @burnspbesq: Actually, Microsoft has some people that do what you do on staff, and because of that, they’ve ripped off WA state for years by routing all boxed windows sales through a 4 person office in Nevada. Yes, the same office that got targeted in the post 9/11 “anthrax” scare.

    Even while WA was really hurting after the .com bust, MS was doing this – and then they’d turn around and bray about how they donated some money to a local school district (probably the one on Mercer Island heh)

    I contracted at MS on and off for years. I wrote part of XP (we called it Whistler at the time).

    And I won’t buy their software. As far as I am concerned it’s my civic duty to help every WA state resident rip off their products.

    Fuck them. They followed the letter of the law, but not the spirit. And they’d have a hard time closing that particular tax loophole anyway since it’d most likely interfere with corporations that legitimately operate in several states.

    Guys like you help make this happen.

    The reason I wasn’t perm there is I only worked there as a last resort. When it came between supporting my family or standing on principle. And I wasn’t very popular when any kind of lawsuit was brought up at the water cooler – or heaven forbid – a team meeting.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Omnes Omnibus on On the Lighter Side (Jun 6, 2023 @ 7:21pm)
  • suzanne on Before The Trim (Jun 6, 2023 @ 7:21pm)
  • Other MJS on Before The Trim (Jun 6, 2023 @ 7:20pm)
  • different-church-lady on On the Lighter Side (Jun 6, 2023 @ 7:19pm)
  • mrmoshpotato on On the Lighter Side (Jun 6, 2023 @ 7:18pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!