• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

This fight is for everything.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

This blog will pay for itself.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Battle won, war still ongoing.

I really should read my own blog.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Media / Borrowed Ethnicity

Borrowed Ethnicity

by Betty Cracker|  May 1, 20129:32 am| 109 Comments

This post is in: Media, Politics, General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Looks like the wingnuts are all aflutter because, according to “family lore,” very, very white lady Elizabeth Warren may have some Native American ancestry, and Harvard and / or other educational institutions that employed the professor may have listed her as a minority in faculty directories.

I think this sort of thing happens more often than we think. I doubt very much Warren ever tried to benefit from Affirmative Action or organize a Trail of Tears reenactment as the more disreputable wingnut outlets are claiming.

However, as a pale, freckled white lady of English, Irish and Scandinavian stock who could pass for Warren’s kinswoman, I can attest that I grew up hearing rumors in my own family of a Native American great-great-grandmother, and that I took some pride and comfort in the thought that perhaps all my forebears didn’t appear to be carved out of cream cheese.*

Not that, aside from the need to seek shade during daylight hours, there’s anything wrong with being a pale and freckly WASP. But if you subtract being the beneficiary of hundreds of years of privilege, it’s kind of boring.

[*H/T: Steel Magnolias; X-posted at Rumproast]
FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « One-Note Samba
Next Post: Krugthulhu Versus The King In Yellow Gold »

Reader Interactions

109Comments

  1. 1.

    rlrr

    May 1, 2012 at 9:38 am

    Not that, aside from the need to seek shade during daylight hours, there’s anything wrong with being a pale and freckly WASP.

    Some of us pretty much burst into flames when exposed to direct sunlight. I wish I had some darker ancestors…

  2. 2.

    xian

    May 1, 2012 at 9:41 am

    Isn’t she from Oklahoma, the state that was once a territory set aside for native Americans (sort of a bantustan, in a sense)?

    This also reminds me of all the southern whites who claim to be 1/64th Cherokee (but are actually 1/64th African American).

  3. 3.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 9:42 am

    I can attest that I grew up hearing rumors in my own family of a Native American great-great-grandmother, and that I took some pride and comfort in the thought that perhaps all my forebears didn’t appear to be carved out of cream cheese.

    I understand the sentiment—I’m genetically half eastern-European Jew and on the other side there apparently was a bastard somewhere along the line who had some unclassified swarthiness—but the faster people start understanding that as species go humans are very, very similar genetically to one another, the better.

  4. 4.

    c u n d gulag

    May 1, 2012 at 9:43 am

    Don’t just be proud of your Native American heritage.

    Be proud of your Russian heritage – after all, that’s where the Native Americans came from!

    And we should all be proud of our African heritage – because that’s where we ALL came from.

    Except, of course, those from “Cloud Coo-Coo Land,” who believe God created Adam 6,000 years ago, and Eve came from his Rib-shack.

  5. 5.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 9:43 am

    @rlrr:
    Well, the one good thing is that it’s easier for you to generate vitamin D. (Speaking as someone who’s definitely on the pasty side.)

  6. 6.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 9:44 am

    @c u n d gulag:

    And we should all be proud of our African heritage – because that’s where we ALL came from.

    Damn straight.

  7. 7.

    rlrr

    May 1, 2012 at 9:47 am

    @liberal:

    Romney believes humanity originated in Missouri…

  8. 8.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 1, 2012 at 9:48 am

    Being from Oklahoma, which used to be, basically, one huge reservation for Native Americans, kinda tilts things in Warren’s favor for having some Native American ancestry.

    My maternal grandfather once told me, as I tanned easily in his Orlando area back yard back in the early 70’s, that this may be due to some Native American ancestry in the family. The other ancestors of course were your usual hodgepodge of northern European types, mostly English…one ancestor served in the Continental Congress.

    Now, the wingnuts will be wingnuts, of course. Fuck them.

  9. 9.

    Linda Featheringill

    May 1, 2012 at 9:50 am

    aside from the need to seek shade during daylight hours

    LOL! Absolutely.

    And, rirr, I also “burst into flames when exposed to direct sunlight”.

  10. 10.

    Dork

    May 1, 2012 at 9:51 am

    Looks like the wingnuts are all aflutter because, according to “family lore,” very, very white lady Elizabeth Warren may have some Native American ancestry

    Serious question — why do they care? Why does this matter, politically? I’m at a loss….

  11. 11.

    gex

    May 1, 2012 at 9:51 am

    Suppose she might have *possibly* received some benefit for her Native heritage. Still isn’t nearly as beneficial as the benefit of being a SWCM.

  12. 12.

    SenyorDave

    May 1, 2012 at 9:53 am

    She’s toast if she can’t prove it.

  13. 13.

    Bruce S

    May 1, 2012 at 9:54 am

    Of course Warren was a Republican during the years in question, but…

  14. 14.

    Boots Day

    May 1, 2012 at 9:55 am

    Sarah Palin has bragged about the fact that her husband is one-eighth Eskimo, which also entitled him to Alaskan fishing rights that aren’t available to the general public. But that’s totally different.

  15. 15.

    FlipYrWhig

    May 1, 2012 at 9:55 am

    She was probably “listed as a minority,” if that means anything, on account of being, you know, a woman. Women are still underrepresented in a lot of work environments.

  16. 16.

    rlrr

    May 1, 2012 at 9:56 am

    @Bruce S: @SenyorDave:

    I’m not sure how one could prove it. My grandmother was supposedly 1/4 Cherokee, I have no idea how her claim can be verified…

  17. 17.

    Linda Featheringill

    May 1, 2012 at 9:57 am

    @Dork:

    Serious question—why do they care? Why does this matter, politically? I’m at a loss….

    Redstate is crying about, among other things, racial fraud.

    http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2012/04/30/did-elizabeth-warren-d-cand-ma-sen-pri-actually-claim-minority-status-for-her-own-benefit-after-all/

  18. 18.

    rlrr

    May 1, 2012 at 9:59 am

    @Linda Featheringill:

    When is Redstate not crying about something?

  19. 19.

    Linda Featheringill

    May 1, 2012 at 10:00 am

    @rlrr:

    Redstate does cry a lot.

    The term “racial fraud” fascinates me. Do you think that includes “passing”?

    ETA:
    OMG! Do you think that Elizabeth is passing as a WASP?

  20. 20.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 1, 2012 at 10:01 am

    @rlrr:

    Oooh, oooh, I know the answer to that!

    “Never!”

  21. 21.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    May 1, 2012 at 10:04 am

    In other MA Senate news, Scott Brown’s daughter has health insurance thanks to OBAMACARE! OBAMASCARE? OBAMACARES? OBAMASCARES?

  22. 22.

    Teddy's Person

    May 1, 2012 at 10:04 am

    When talk of ancestors came up in my household, my mother was fond of replying, “Don’t kid yourself, your ancestors were horse thieves who were thrown out of every country in Europe,” which I thought would be kind of cool if true (don’t know whether it was or not).

    I too have a great-great grandmother who was a Delaware Indian. We have a picture of her and her husband, who was kicked in the mouth by a mule and had a horseshoe–shaped bald spot in his beard.

  23. 23.

    HRA

    May 1, 2012 at 10:04 am

    First of all, some of our higher education institutes (mine) did take surveys of all employees back some years ago asking if you had any minority ethnicity. Mine is a state school and maybe it only occurred in those who had government funding having to prove they hired minorities.

    The truth is GA has 1/8 Cherokee and is blue eyed and fair. He tells of being a regular in his younger days to a Native American club even though he does not claim any of the 8 parts of ancestry and says he is American whenever asked of his ethnicity.

  24. 24.

    Ash Can

    May 1, 2012 at 10:05 am

    If Harvard is like other schools I know of, it gets extra scratch from the government based on the number of minority group members it enrolls/employs, and would therefore — as do these other schools — actively encourage students and staff to identify any and all minority ancestry in their records. If the right-wingers want to carry on about racial fraud, their gripe is far more likely to be with Harvard itself rather than Elizabeth Warren (although I’m not holding my breath that they’ll ever be bright enough to realize this).

    ETA: I see HRA beat me to it, sort of. :)

  25. 25.

    jeff

    May 1, 2012 at 10:06 am

    Reminds me of the extremely privileged kids I knew whose mom was from Madrid. They got scholarships to college because they are hispanic.

  26. 26.

    kerFuFFler

    May 1, 2012 at 10:07 am

    I’m another pale, befreckled specimen, and my dad’s family also rumored some native ancestry. My mom always pooh-poohed it probably out of her old-fashioned “distaste” for miscegenation. My dentist, however, asked me one time if I was aware that I likely had some native blood. Apparently the cusps of my teeth (my molars) are shaped in a fashion that is quite rare among people without native ancestry.

  27. 27.

    Kay

    May 1, 2012 at 10:09 am

    I think the conservative obsession with ancestry is bizarre.

    I know they’re (again) trying to prove that someone who is accomplished is not, actually, accomplished and got some “special break” that they can then RESENT WITH BITTER FURY but I think it goes deeper than that.

    Why are they always peering at birth certificates and looking at “lineage”? It’s weird.

  28. 28.

    El Cid

    May 1, 2012 at 10:10 am

    It is no mere humorous stereotype how frequently you’ll hear white Southern boys / men cite a rumored Indian ancestor in order to give them some sort of cred as presumably a fiercely genetically skilled tracker / badass.

  29. 29.

    Bruce S

    May 1, 2012 at 10:10 am

    @rlrr:

    The Republican thing is verified by voter registration rolls. Just tossed that out as a minor irony. I’m not questioning her native American ancestry. “Family lore” is enough for her to take pride in a presumed heritage IMHO. Unless, of course, she wants to go on fellow Harvardite Gates TeeVee show and get her DNA tested. But this is a ridiculous issue. They are terrified of Warren and desperate.

  30. 30.

    PaulW

    May 1, 2012 at 10:10 am

    What the hell is wrong with being part Native American? At least you’d have a retort to all those “Birf Certificate” crank questions.

    My grandfather would tell us we had blood lineage to Pocahontas, although my grandmother would note that Grampa was what was known in the South as a “damn liar”, so I really need to verify this with the Kinzer family tree…

  31. 31.

    David

    May 1, 2012 at 10:12 am

    When it’s convenient, Todd Palin claims he’s 1/8 Yup’ik.

  32. 32.

    MattF

    May 1, 2012 at 10:12 am

    There sure seems to have been a lot of mingling, back in the day. More than you might have thought.

  33. 33.

    catclub

    May 1, 2012 at 10:13 am

    @rlrr: I have a vague interest in actually reading the Book of Mormon, but I had to re-organize my sock drawer. At least some parts of the Bible have good writing.

    e.g. Do justice, love mercy, and wait humbly for your God.

  34. 34.

    PaulW

    May 1, 2012 at 10:13 am

    @Kay:

    Why are they always peering at birth certificates and looking at “lineage”? It’s weird.

    Those Republicans are the same ones who’d take pride in claiming their ancestry goes back to the Mayflower. Well, guess what? If Warren does have Native ancestry, she outranks you! Her ancestors came over on the Bering Strait ice bridge! So there.

  35. 35.

    gbear

    May 1, 2012 at 10:14 am

    I’m surprised you didn’t post a video for Half-breed by Cher.

  36. 36.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    May 1, 2012 at 10:15 am

    @liberal:

    Deep down, we are all brown. :)

    Except for White Jesus and his cult of followers.

  37. 37.

    kindness

    May 1, 2012 at 10:16 am

    And in all honesty there are no good WASP jokes out there. I mean, how much can you mock paleness, freckles, boiled meats & foods?

    @c u n d gulag: Somehow I don’t think the Eastern Asian’s who migrated to the America’s were exactly ‘Russian’.

  38. 38.

    MazeDancer

    May 1, 2012 at 10:16 am

    Mark Lindsay – Raider’s lead singer – actually is part Cherokee.

  39. 39.

    cathyx

    May 1, 2012 at 10:16 am

    I have a friend who could never pass for a Native American gets a Native American subsidy for her tribe affiliation.

  40. 40.

    WJS

    May 1, 2012 at 10:23 am

    From her bio on Wikidamnpedia:

    Elizabeth Herring[2] was born June 22, 1949,[3] in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to working class parents Pauline and Donald Herring.[4] She was the Herrings’ fourth child, with three older brothers.[5] According to Warren’s family lore, she has Delaware and Cherokee ancestry on her mother’s side.[6] When Warren was twelve, her father, a janitor, had a heart attack, which led to a pay cut, medical bills, and eventually the loss of their car. Her mother went to work answering phones at Sears and Warren worked as a waitress.

    Now, I don’t want to cast aspersions, but–

    1. Born in Oklahoma? Check

    2, Working class, born in the 1940s? Check

    3, Family lore says Native American heritage? Check

    I’m guessing we will end up with a lap full of wingnut fail once they trace back her ancestry. To take someone born in Oklahoma and speculate that they lied about Native American heritage is wingnut stupid.

    But, yeah. The real question is “who cares?” It doesn’t matter, except in the fevered minds of racists and fools.

  41. 41.

    Paul in KY

    May 1, 2012 at 10:24 am

    Great song. Thanks for the link.

  42. 42.

    El Cid

    May 1, 2012 at 10:26 am

    SHE’S OBVIOUSLY JUST TRYING TO GET INTO OFFICE TO GET SOME OF THAT FEDRUL GUBMIT SUBSIDIES TO INJUNS AND GET PAID OFF TO HELP CA-SI–NOS.

  43. 43.

    BenA

    May 1, 2012 at 10:32 am

    I’m very swarthy… in my younger days when I had a pony tail and was doing way more outside than I do now as a keyboard jockey… I would be asked if I was Native American because of some superficial characteristics.

    When asked my ethnicity I would always say “Swedish.” Which would make people do a double take.. of course it’s also true but I’m also Hungarian which is where I think the slight off-whiteness comes from…

    My wife is 1/8th or 1/16th Ojibway but is much much paler than I am… and no one would ever guess she’s got that much “Native North American” ancestry.

  44. 44.

    Tokyokie

    May 1, 2012 at 10:34 am

    I, too, am an Oklahoma native, and a large percentage of the white kids I knew growing up had some Indian blood. So what? I couldn’t tell you which ones (except the full-bloods), and neither could anybody else unless they told you, because, for all intents and purposes, they were white. Seriously, in Oklahoma, it’s no big deal.

    A lot of the tribes are meticulous about maintaining their tribal rolls, and some will include anybody who’s as little as 1/64th on them. (It’s important for division of monies emanating from tribal-held properties, and, I think, a BIA-imposed requirement.) Because the tribes are careful with their record-keeping, Warren knows about her native American heritage. And that’s a shortcoming on her part? This one’s so out there, even after allowing for the wingers’ stupidity, I can’t understand why they’re doing it.

  45. 45.

    beltane

    May 1, 2012 at 10:34 am

    @WJS: The AP just had a flashing headline up saying that Warren’s Cherokee ancestry is documented and legit. On to the next poutrage I guess.

  46. 46.

    Matt McIrvin

    May 1, 2012 at 10:35 am

    I’d guess most white Americans have stories like this (my family certainly does).

    I’d also guess most white Americans who aren’t recent immigrants do actually have some Native American ancestry, though it probably bears little resemblance to the stories if they can’t provide documentary evidence. (“Cherokee” seems to be the universal stand-in in white American genealogical lore for “non-white, misc.”)

    It annoys the hell out of American Indians, of course, when white people try to use it for some kind of romantic ethnic cred. But it doesn’t appear that Warren has actually been going around doing this.

  47. 47.

    stuckinred

    May 1, 2012 at 10:35 am

    CLEVELAND, Ohio – The FBI arrested five men Monday evening, saying they had planted what they believed were explosive devices under the Ohio 82 bridge over Cuyahoga Valley National Park as part of a May Day protest today.

    The five men were “self-proclaimed anarchists,” who intended to detonate two improvised explosive devices (IEDs) under the bridge in Sagamore Hills, but had purchased the inert devices from undercover FBI agents, officials said.

  48. 48.

    Matt McIrvin

    May 1, 2012 at 10:36 am

    …just saw Beltane’s update saying that Warren can document it. So this isn’t the usual “one-sixteenth genuine Cherokee princess” story, I guess.

  49. 49.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 1, 2012 at 10:36 am

    @Tokyokie:

    This one’s so out there, even after allowing for the wingers’ stupidity, I can’t understand why they’re doing it

    It’s their nature.

  50. 50.

    Ruckus

    May 1, 2012 at 10:39 am

    I can attest that I grew up hearing rumors in my own family of a Native American great-great-grandmother, and that I took some pride and comfort in the thought that perhaps all my forebears didn’t appear to be carved out of cream cheese.

    Pretty much the same story in my family. I was told great-great grandmaw was Blackfoot. Of course I was told a lot of stuff that turned out to be less than truthful. Santa, the tooth fairy, religion… Maybe this is the one that is real.

  51. 51.

    beltane

    May 1, 2012 at 10:42 am

    @Matt McIrvin: From what I’ve seen on the 23andMe forums, detectable Native American ancestry in white Colonial Americans is actually quite rare. Much more common are cases where that “Cherokee princess” ancestor turns out to be a light-skinned African-American ancestor.

  52. 52.

    Amir Khalid

    May 1, 2012 at 10:42 am

    I doubt any “white” American could seriously claim to be of pure north European stock, particularly if his family had spent two or three centuries in America. Chances are at least one of his many ancestors was of other stock — native American, African, Asian, whatever.

    To make a scandal of this nothingburger, Scott Brown would have to prove that Warren was ever hired as part of an affirmative-action quota for Native Americans, or that she ever got any sort of benefit reserved for native Americans. But he can’t prove that. Four universities where she taught have denied hiring her as a minority, citing instead her prowess as a teacher. So I reckon he’s SOL.

  53. 53.

    beltane

    May 1, 2012 at 10:43 am

    @Matt McIrvin: I can’t find the link. It was flashing on The Guardian, but there has since been some kind of disaster in India which moved the Warren story off the headlines.

  54. 54.

    Kay

    May 1, 2012 at 10:44 am

    @PaulW:

    Those Republicans are the same ones who’d take pride in claiming their ancestry goes back to the Mayflower

    When I lived in North Carolina I worked for a fancy southern family, in the greenhouse, which was (supposedly) also a legit business. When I met the aunt who lived on the property (her nephew hired me) she asked my name, asked if I was married (I was) and then said “what were you?” I was genuinely stumped. I thought it was like a philosophical question, so I was thinking “I don’t know-what WAS I- a …person? what could she possibly WANT here?”

    She wanted to know my original last name. Duh.

  55. 55.

    WereBear

    May 1, 2012 at 10:48 am

    I have a Native American Great Grandmother; not enough to matter, per the government. Mr WereBear has a half-Abenaki grandmother; raised in an orphanage and never got over it. But once again, aside from understanding Grandma, un-pertinent to much of anything.

    It’s simply a sign of how xenophobic the Right Wing Base might be that it is even brought up. Reminds me of an episode of The Chris Isaacs Show, where the nutty piano player brags of such fugitive ancestry; and the folks who run the casino responds with sarcastic “join the club” comments. It would be difficult to find someone who isn’t mixed with “something,” even pale folk like myself. I have brothers who tan like Malibu Barbies.

    Also, BTW, glad you’re feeling better, Betty!

  56. 56.

    beltane

    May 1, 2012 at 10:49 am

    @Amir Khalid: You’d be surprised. Virtually all Americans of colonial descent (i.e. their ancestors were in this country before the great waves of immigration in the late 1800’s) are of exclusively northern European stock and are genetically quite similar to each other. Population geneticists and medical researchers even use the CEU reference group (white European descended people from Utah) as a stand-in for generic northern Europeans. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp_viewTable.cgi?pop=1409

  57. 57.

    Ruckus

    May 1, 2012 at 10:51 am

    @Teddy’s Person:
    In my family, and I mean that in the older Italian “family” way, great-great granddad was reported to have been asked to leave Sicily because he was too big an asshole. It sure would explain a lot about some of the descendants.

  58. 58.

    redshirt

    May 1, 2012 at 10:51 am

    I’ve long considered myself this, as all humans should (Space Credits to whomever gets the reference):

    “Fifty percent Collie! Fifty percent setter, Irish Setter! Fifty Percent Boxer! Fifty percent Doberman Pincher! Fifty percent pointer—there it is! There it is! There it is! But, mostly, I’m all Labrador Retriever!”

  59. 59.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 10:51 am

    @Kay:

    I think the conservative obsession with ancestry is bizarre.

    Well, OTOH, the Mormon thing about keeping up these precise geneological records apparently has been useful for some genetics research (in particular, into the genetics component of some diseases), so there’s that.

  60. 60.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 10:53 am

    @beltane:

    Virtually all Americans of colonial descent (i.e. their ancestors were in this country before the great waves of immigration in the late 1800’s) are of exclusively northern European stock and are genetically quite similar to each other.

    I hadn’t seen anything on that, but it comports with my intuition about history and outbreeding.

  61. 61.

    WJS

    May 1, 2012 at 10:55 am

    @Amir Khalid: Those people of “pure” Northern European stock? They laid with the Romans, and whoever else traipsed through their lands. They are not as “pure” as the Aryan Brotherhood wishes them to be.

    Just sayin’

  62. 62.

    Kay

    May 1, 2012 at 10:55 am

    @liberal:

    Oh, I see that, and I get it as a hobby, it’s probably really interesting, but they have all these elaborate theories that are grounded in “bloodlines”. The whole thing they had going where Obama inherited some kind of “mindset” through the blood that predetermines his actions is just odd to me.

  63. 63.

    WJS

    May 1, 2012 at 10:56 am

    @beltane: We reach the point of wingnut fail in mere moments now, do we not?

  64. 64.

    redshirt

    May 1, 2012 at 10:58 am

    @Kay: @Kay: It’s a pretty ancient tradition though – think of the countless generations of arranged marriages throughout history that were shaped, in part, by some notion of “bloodlines” and cultivating certain behaviors. Breeding programs, in other words.

    I doubt there’s much truth in it, but perhaps some.

  65. 65.

    Holden Pattern

    May 1, 2012 at 10:59 am

    This happened to me once (and I am white-whitey-white-white except for the family lore). It’s likely that Warren didn’t even know that Harvard did that — I only learned by accident that my employer had included me in the “minority” list / diversity count based on something I’d mentioned to the in-house recruiting person after I was hired.

  66. 66.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 11:00 am

    @Kay:
    Yeah, of course. The “blood” stuff was all the rage…about 100 years ago.

  67. 67.

    boss bitch

    May 1, 2012 at 11:01 am

    Oh so its not only African Americans that claim to have “Indidan in the family”? Fascinating.

  68. 68.

    Kay

    May 1, 2012 at 11:01 am

    @redshirt:

    Breeding programs, in other words

    That’s what it reminds me of. Where they say “out of” (female, I think) and “by” (male).

  69. 69.

    WereBear

    May 1, 2012 at 11:02 am

    @redshirt: And where does it get you, though?

    Upper Class Twit of the Year, chickens who can’t walk because of their oversized chest muscles, and bulldogs who have to give birth through Caesarean since their heads are freakishly big.

    It’s just another excuse for being useless half-wits; grabbing at something else, that other people did, to shore up a molecular-sized bit of self-esteem.

    My response: So you’ve never heard of hybrid vigor?

  70. 70.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 11:03 am

    @redshirt:
    Is that really true, though? I thought most of that arranged marriage stuff had something to do with economics and power arrangements.

  71. 71.

    redshirt

    May 1, 2012 at 11:06 am

    @liberal: No doubt about that. But the concept of bloodlines played a large part in those calculations too, if you consider: 1. You’re Royalty (or aspiring), and you are because of 2. Your noble bloodline.

  72. 72.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 11:06 am

    @WereBear:


    So you’ve never heard of hybrid vigor?

    Hah hah. I use the “hybrid vigor” term all the time in reference to myself being a (European) mutt. (Though in the big scheme of things, not all that hybrid.)

    Interestingly, “heterosis” has been used in an attempt to explain all sorts of things, from the Flynn Effect (good) to rampant myopia.

  73. 73.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 11:07 am

    @redshirt:
    Yeah, though what did they themselves think they were cultivating genetically? (I don’t know myself.) Seems like they cultivated a lot of things like hemophelia.

  74. 74.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 1, 2012 at 11:07 am

    @Kay:

    It’s sort of like inverse Lysenkoism, and every bit as grounded in reality.

  75. 75.

    redshirt

    May 1, 2012 at 11:08 am

    @WereBear: I read something recently that many Royal families were spared the worst of genetic issues from inbreeding due to the “Milkman Affect” – that is, woman cheating on their husbands and having children from these hook ups, unbeknownst to their Lordly, inbred husbands. Introduce new genes to the mix!

  76. 76.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 11:09 am

    @Kay:

    The whole thing they had going where Obama inherited some kind of “mindset” through the blood that predetermines his actions is just odd to me.

    Hah hah. That’s at odds with my (very liberal, Obama-voting-in-2008-but-very-critical-of-Obama) dad who commented that he wished Obama were “more black”.

  77. 77.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 11:10 am

    @redshirt:
    I think I’ve read claims that at some point, amongst us commoners anyways, the fraction of people conceived under conditions of “sperm competition” was something of the order of 20%.

    Harlots!

  78. 78.

    beltane

    May 1, 2012 at 11:11 am

    @redshirt: How does this explain the large number of dumbass Southern ladies who obsess about their precious “pedigrees”? To me, the proof is in the pudding: these people may be racially “pure” but there is not even the tiniest bit of evidence to suggest they are “superior” in any way. If anything, the opposite appears to be true.

  79. 79.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 11:12 am

    @redshirt:
    Jesus, what were Charles’ conditions for the mate who ended up being Diana? Royal or noble, plus a virgin?

  80. 80.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 11:13 am

    @beltane:
    My guess is that, sadly, the instinct to pay at least some attention to this kind of silliness is universally human.

  81. 81.

    liberal

    May 1, 2012 at 11:16 am

    @stuckinred:
    Well, on the bright side, at least that means they’re no longer just entrapping Muslims.

  82. 82.

    redshirt

    May 1, 2012 at 11:16 am

    @beltane: Oh, I’m not saying there’s much merit to any of this – it’s mostly tribal bullshit and personal mythology. Clearly, there’s some foundation to real breeding programs (two tall people hook up, you probably get a tall child). This stuff about “in the bloodlines” is just self-serving hocus pocus though.

  83. 83.

    redshirt

    May 1, 2012 at 11:18 am

    @liberal: Sperm competition is awesome – the first sport, literally! I was amazed that different sperm exhibit different behaviors. Most rush for the egg, but some actually form a defensive perimeter and will actively attack any incoming foreign sperm. Amazing!

  84. 84.

    Matt McIrvin

    May 1, 2012 at 11:19 am

    @beltane: The fact that “Cherokee” often or usually means “African-American” doesn’t surprise me at all; the relative lack of actual Native American ancestry kind of does. But it’s far from the only surprising result you can get from DNA testing.

  85. 85.

    PonB

    May 1, 2012 at 11:19 am

    “Sir, he specifically requested two ‘niggers’. Well, to tell the family secret, my grandmother was Dutch.”

    – Bart, Blazing Saddles

  86. 86.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 1, 2012 at 11:20 am

    @liberal:

    The virgin part was really important. I remember a movie about Peter the Great where the display of the bloodied bedclothes of the wedding night was an important signifier that the royal wedding was a success.

  87. 87.

    28 Percent

    May 1, 2012 at 11:24 am

    Walter White, head of the NAACP from 1931-55, had blond hair, blue eyes, white skin, and grandparents who were slaves.

    Ancestry’s a funny thing.

  88. 88.

    Judas Escargot, Your Postmodern Neighbor

    May 1, 2012 at 11:33 am

    Yep, this is yawnworthy. I’m half French-Canadian (Acadien, direct descendant of one of the colony’s founders). Unlike the English colonists, the early French settlers didn’t bring a lot of women with them… so most of the old Acadien families are assumed to have some Micmac in them. (Meet a nice native girl, trade a few pelts and furs as a dowry, convert her to Christianity, change her name to Marie and voila!, instant wife!) Nobody makes a big deal about it.

    BTW, the local media (WBZ newsradio and Murdoch’s Boston Herald in particular) are totally in the tank for Scott Brown, so this isn’t surprising. In some ways, it’s interesting that they’re starting to throw BS like this at Warren so early in the cycle. Makes me curious as to what Sen. Brown’s internal polling is telling him.

    Unfortunately, Sen Brown’s base is the extremely low-information, blue collar contractor –the “This Old House voter” as I keep calling them– so I’ll be hearing every single chestnut at every single BBQ all summer I suppose.

  89. 89.

    AxelFoley

    May 1, 2012 at 11:33 am

    @xian:

    This also reminds me of all the southern whites who claim to be 1/64th Cherokee (but are actually 1/64th African American).

    I often wonder why white folks never claim to have any black in them. We know that black folks whose families have been in this country before 1900 have white in them somewhere down the line.

  90. 90.

    Brachiator

    May 1, 2012 at 11:40 am

    @kerFuFFler:

    I’m another pale, befreckled specimen

    Not as much of a connection between coloration and ethnicity as a lot of people think.

    @Kay:

    I think the conservative obsession with ancestry is bizarre.

    Agreed, although her the conservative wingnuts appear to be trying to work up outrage about Warren possibly falsely benefitting from hated affirmative action laws.

    Why are they always peering at birth certificates and looking at “lineage”? It’s weird.

    And yet they only do this with liberals. As another poster noted, Sarah Palin had no problem touting her husband’s Eskimo heritage. But presumably he worked hard like a Real White Man(tm) and never sought any affirmative action advantage.

  91. 91.

    Matt McIrvin

    May 1, 2012 at 11:46 am

    @AxelFoley: It’s ye olde American One-Drop Rule at work. Whiteness is the fragile thing that has to be unsullied by blackness (though Noble Cherokees are evidently OK) lest it be forfeited entirely. Masculinity works more or less the same way.

  92. 92.

    FlipYrWhig

    May 1, 2012 at 11:46 am

    @liberal: Your dad is Michael Moore? :P

  93. 93.

    Anya

    May 1, 2012 at 11:55 am

    @Judas Escargot, Your Postmodern Neighbor: You must be related to Beyonce. Her mom descendant of Acadian leader Joseph Broussard. I don’t know why I know this…

  94. 94.

    Anya

    May 1, 2012 at 11:57 am

    @Brachiator: Her daughter’s son is considered native and is receiving health benefits as a native.

  95. 95.

    Brachiator

    May 1, 2012 at 12:03 pm

    @beltane:

    You’d be surprised. Virtually all Americans of colonial descent (i.e. their ancestors were in this country before the great waves of immigration in the late 1800’s) are of exclusively northern European stock and are genetically quite similar to each other.

    I don’t know about that.

    First, the notion of “nothern European” stock is pretty meaningless. There are Portuguese, for example, who are as white as snow, but who clearly have African ancestry. This is known because they have the same genetic markers for sickle cell as Africans. Their ancestors lived in areas of Portugal that had malaria, and also mated with captive Africans. Through the luck of the genetic draw, the sickle cell trait that protected some African populations protected them as well.

    Early North America was economically bonded to the West Indies (Alexander Hamilton was born in Nevis, on of the islands of the British West Indies).

    There were mixed race people among the Spanish and Dutch people who pre-dated the English in North America. And strangely enough, Native American ancestry was rarely a bar to be considered “white” in most state with statutory racial codes, especially in Virginia.

    And then there are groups like the Canadian Métis:

    In Canada, the term usually designates a constitutionally recognized individual born of an Aboriginal group, descended primarily from the marriages of Scottish and French men to Cree, Saulteaux, and Ojibwa women in southern Rupert’s Land starting in the late 17th century, and the marriages of French men to Ojibway women starting in Quebec in the middle 17th century.

    In America, there are groups like the Lumbee, who often claim “pure” Native American ancestry, but are mixed race:

    In the first federal census of 1790, the ancestors of the Lumbee were among those enumerated as “free persons of color”, a category used to describe all free non-whites (including landless Indians, and persons of mixed-race descent: Indian-White/White-African/African-Indian-White). In subsequent censuses, these people were listed in the category of “all other free persons” or “mulatto.” European Americans tended to assume that landless Indians without their own territory or reservations would assimilate to the United States society, but this was not true. In addition, given the nature of the slave society of North Carolina, European Americans classified all people of African descent as African/black, regardless of their culture, other ethnicity, and self-identification. Through the 19th and into the 20th century, whites increasingly identified all people of color as black and assumed to have been of slave descent, as it had become a racial caste in the eighteenth century.

    The And this is just North America. The Americas have been racially mixed since the first Europeans came here. And this probably includes the Vikings.

  96. 96.

    Ruckus

    May 1, 2012 at 12:16 pm

    People, People, can’t we all just get along?

  97. 97.

    PaulW

    May 1, 2012 at 12:18 pm

    @Ruckus:

    People, People, can’t we all just get along?

    When have we ever gotten along…?

  98. 98.

    c u n d gulag

    May 1, 2012 at 12:26 pm

    @kindness:
    Ya think? ;-)

  99. 99.

    Judas Escargot, Your Postmodern Neighbor

    May 1, 2012 at 12:57 pm

    @Anya:

    You must be related to Beyonce. Her mom descendant of Acadian leader Joseph Broussard.

    The Acadien gene pool isn’t particularly deep, but to my knowledge I’m not directly descended from Broussard (Beausoleil!). A few direct ancestors are said to have fought beside him against the English after the Expulsion, but I haven’t been able to verify this.

    They didn’t follow him down to Louisiana, though, so despite the blood ties I don’t self-identify as Cajun. Eventually the English (realizing a few decades too late that they had no particular loyalty to the French King despite their language) decided to let them re-settle in New Brunswick.

  100. 100.

    Phoenix_rising

    May 1, 2012 at 1:14 pm

    Somebody got a link to ‘she’s got it documented’?

    I ask because of my own family lore, which my sister partially documented a few years ago. Our then-90-year-old great-aunt told her younger sibs and descendants, Mama (my great-grandmother) was half-Indian and was bought by Papa from the white family that had taken her in to help with their kids after her mom died. As in, he met her, was taken with her, and paid a dowry of some kind to buy out her remaining service obligation to the family, as she was 15 at the time.

    My sister was able to verify (through banking and property transactions plus newspaper stories) that Papa had been given a one-time veteran’s payment at the end of WWI, that he spent part of it on a wagon and the rest on land, and that some of the money had gone missing with no property or gods to show for it. That seems to verify the family lore about the payment, and comports with the timing of our great-aunt’s birth after the hasty ‘wedding’.

    But the part where great-grandma was born to an Indian mama in a cabin in the hills of Kentucky, her daddy was a rolling stone and she was essentially sold by the family that took her in as the unpaid help? Is inherently not verifiable. How would one go about verifying such a thing?

  101. 101.

    Ruckus

    May 1, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    @PaulW:
    Hard to reply with my tongue stuck in my cheek so far.

  102. 102.

    Brachiator

    May 1, 2012 at 1:49 pm

    @Phoenix_rising:

    But the part where great-grandma was born to an Indian mama in a cabin in the hills of Kentucky, her daddy was a rolling stone and she was essentially sold by the family that took her in as the unpaid help? Is inherently not verifiable.

    There is much here that is also not plausible. But what years are you talking about?

    From the 1800s on, when there is talk about selling people, usually it’s about black slavery, not any form of indentured servitude.

    One thing that might be of some help is looking at different kinds of records. An LA Times reporter who found a surprising black ancestry noted the following as he was trying to look into the past:

    It’s hard to tell when Mozingos first passed as white. There was no consistency in how census takers and court clerks defined race.
    __
    Wiley’s lineage can be directly traced as far back as a Christopher Mozingo, who was born in 1800 and listed as mulatto in census records but white on a tax list.
    __
    Rhodie’s can be traced all the way to the 1600s and Edward.
    __
    By the late 1700s, Rhodie’s great-great-great-great-grandfather John was identified as white on tax lists, as were his three brothers. But the brothers also appear on a registry of “Free Molattoes.”
    __
    John, who had more money than his brothers and even owned a slave, probably had the clout to keep his name off. From then on, Rhodie’s ancestors were considered white.

    Native American historical societies may also keep records that might be of help.

  103. 103.

    billgerat

    May 1, 2012 at 2:42 pm

    I am 1/8 Cherokee (along with 1/8 German and 1/8 French and a smattering of a lot of other European genes) and when I was in grade school back in the late 60’s I was offered to take advantage of some federal government Indian assistance programs. Their cut-off line was at 1/16. I never did though because 1) I really don’t look Native American (I, too, burst into flame in direct sunlight – in fact, if I take off my shirt, people are blinded by the white) and 2) I would have felt that I was a fraud when there are way too many kids on the Rez that could have used those programs.

    The wingnuts using race against anyone doesn”t surprise me at all. What does surprise me is that in this day and age that anyone really believes that race makes a difference in character and intelligence.

    You know, maybe we should make up a federal assistance program for wingnuts who belive in such things….

  104. 104.

    muddy

    May 1, 2012 at 3:40 pm

    I’m just hoping that one day my freckles will merge and I will have a tan. I’ve always wished to be solid-colored rather than polkadot. I guess I might have been solid bluish white had I lived in misty northern Europe. Or if there was such a thing as sunscreen back in the misty days of my youth.

  105. 105.

    Cathy W

    May 1, 2012 at 4:30 pm

    @Phoenix_rising: If this was 1815 rather than 1915, there’d probably be court records of an indenture. That’s a little odd for 1915 though. So is a “half-Indian” in Kentucky, at least a real one – although there were parts of the state that were just crawling with “part-Indian” folks who were really “part-Black”, or even more mixed than that – the Melungeons have turned out to have Turkish and Portuguese genetic markers in addition to Black and Native American, as I recall.

    In general this kind of thing is easier to disprove than to prove. There probably wouldn’t be a birth certificate either way – Kentucky was one of the last states to require births to be registered. Look at the 1910 and 1920 censuses – to some extent the information is available on familysearch.org, and even natives should have been enumerated. Look for a death certificate – it should give her parents’ names. Look for a marriage license – if they were legally married, even in Kentucky, even in 1915ish, a 15-year-old girl should have had someone sign for consent, and it may have given her parents’ names…and I don’t remember what else was on Kentucky marriage licenses in that time frame. But if the story you’ve been told is true, my guess is that there won’t be a lot of legal records of any kind, and “absence of evidence” proves precisely nothing.

  106. 106.

    Mnemosyne

    May 1, 2012 at 4:39 pm

    It would be kind of cool to have some interesting ancestry pop up on my family tree, but I’m pretty sure that, like Stephen Colbert, I would pop up as “100% white guy” (or gal, in my case).

    I see one person above alluded to them, but if you’re interested in American history and/or genealogy, you should definitely try to see the two Henry Louis Gates PBS shows, “Faces of America” and “Finding Your Roots.” They’re really fascinating and they’re both available for free streaming on the PBS website. Some celebrities have surprisingly fascinating backgrounds like Kyra Sedgwick’s, who’s a Mayflower descendant on one side and 100% Ashkenazi Jewish on the other. One of her New England ancestors was the man who brought the lawsuit that ended slavery in Massachusetts.

    ETA: Also, too, during the shows Gates talks about his astonishment when he traced his own roots and discovered that he’s actually majority European — IIRC, he found that he has 60% European (mostly Irish) and 40% African ancestry.

  107. 107.

    Mnemosyne

    May 2, 2012 at 12:59 am

    If anyone wanders into this dead thread, here’s a link to the story confirming that, yes, Warren is in fact 1/32nd Cherokee.

  108. 108.

    priscianusjr

    May 3, 2012 at 9:16 am

    Betty, I’m afraid you really started this thread off on the wrong foot.
    Do you know who this is?
    http://www.alumni.rutgers.edu/show_module_fw2.aspx?sid=896&gid=1&nologo=1&cid=720&blog_id=9&[email protected]liberal:

  109. 109.

    priscianusjr

    May 3, 2012 at 9:20 am

    @xian:

    This also reminds me of all the southern whites who claim to be 1/64th Cherokee (but are actually 1/64th African American).

    Ummm, why the “but” ? … there’s no contradiction there. If somebody is 1/64th African American AND 1/64th Cherokee, that still leaves 62 more parts unaccounted for.Plenty of room to go around.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Ihop on Open Thread: TANSTAAFL! — It’s The Latest GOP Zombie Fad (Mar 20, 2023 @ 6:28pm)
  • Baud on Twenty Years Gone (Mar 20, 2023 @ 6:28pm)
  • Elizabelle on Twenty Years Gone (Mar 20, 2023 @ 6:28pm)
  • Roger Moore on Twenty Years Gone (Mar 20, 2023 @ 6:25pm)
  • Sure Lurkalot on Twenty Years Gone (Mar 20, 2023 @ 6:25pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!