• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We’re watching the self-immolation of the leading world power on a level unprecedented in human history.

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

Cancel the cowardly Times and Post and set up an equivalent monthly donation to ProPublica.

Let’s bury these fuckers at the polls 2 years from now.

If ‘weird’ was the finish line, they ran through the tape and kept running.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

Jack be nimble, jack be quick, hurry up and indict this prick.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Weird. Rome has an American Pope and America has a Russian President.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Giving in to doom is how authoritarians win.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

The words do not have to be perfect.

Not loving this new fraud based economy.

Of course you can have champagne before noon. That’s why orange juice was invented.

If a good thing happens for a bad reason, it’s still a good thing.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / SCOTUS Open Thread

SCOTUS Open Thread

by @heymistermix.com|  June 28, 201210:01 am| 345 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

Here’s a thread for the wailing and gnashing of teeth that will follow this morning’s decision.

Yesterday, I saw a Romney sticker on a Prius. Is that a sign? Perhaps it’s like a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac. No little voice in my head said “don’t look back”, so I’m not sure.

I’m leaving for a vacation today and won’t be posting regularly for a couple of weeks. No matter what happens today, it’s good news for Republicans in general and Mitt Romney in particular, but I will miss writing about it.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « 1% + 27% > 50%
Next Post: SCOTUS Opinion »

Reader Interactions

345Comments

  1. 1.

    Comrade Mary

    June 28, 2012 at 10:01 am

    I’m actually getting that sinking feeling. Do I dare open SCOTUSblog?

  2. 2.

    LGRooney

    June 28, 2012 at 10:03 am

    Little bubbling in the back of my brain wonders whether the right-wing won’t get its way on the health care ruling and that is why they want to vote on the Holder contempt charge today, i.e., distract from the bad news.

  3. 3.

    PeakVT

    June 28, 2012 at 10:04 am

    We’re doomed. Doomed, I tells ya.

  4. 4.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 10:04 am

    Perhaps it’s like a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac.

    the world’s gone to hell in a handbasket ever since bob dylan started doing commercials for cadillac.

  5. 5.

    Mark S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:05 am

    Yes! Affirmed!

    Oh, that’s for some case called Alvarez.

  6. 6.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:05 am

    No time for wailing. It’s a war, peeples.

  7. 7.

    SGEW

    June 28, 2012 at 10:06 am

    I’ve got a bad feeling about this.

  8. 8.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 10:06 am

    @Mark S.:

    dick.

  9. 9.

    ericblair

    June 28, 2012 at 10:06 am

    @Mark S.:

    Oh, that’s for some case called Alvarez.

    As far as I know, that’s the one about a law banning lying about having a Medal of Honor. Decision striking down the law on 1A grounds upheld.

  10. 10.

    dmsilev

    June 28, 2012 at 10:07 am

    Health care opinion up now. Here we go…

  11. 11.

    Valdivia

    June 28, 2012 at 10:07 am

    I am so freaked out I think people will hear me scream all the way to India if they bring the whole thing down.

  12. 12.

    beltane

    June 28, 2012 at 10:07 am

    @General Stuck: Yeah, no matter the outcome the GOP must be destroyed if we want to have nice things as a country.

  13. 13.

    TooManyJens

    June 28, 2012 at 10:08 am

    SCOTUSblog just said they have 520,000 people watching their liveblog right now. They also said it cost them $25,000 to do the upgrades they needed to handle today’s traffic. Pretty amazing.

  14. 14.

    TooManyJens

    June 28, 2012 at 10:08 am

    “We have health care opinion.

    Parsing it asap.”

  15. 15.

    Chris

    June 28, 2012 at 10:08 am

    @Comrade Mary:

    I’m actually getting that sinking feeling. Do I dare open SCOTUSblog?

    I’ve had the sinking feeling for most of last week. At this point I’m at that odd, beyond-the-sinking-feeling, “fuck it, just tell me what happened” point.

  16. 16.

    dmsilev

    June 28, 2012 at 10:08 am

    “The individual mandate survives as a tax”

  17. 17.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:08 am

    WIN!!

  18. 18.

    cyntax

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    The mandate survives as a tax per SCOTUSblog.

  19. 19.

    ericblair

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    Mandate survives as a tax

  20. 20.

    Tim F.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    Sounds good?

  21. 21.

    Mark S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    The individual mandate survives as a tax.

    Ha! See ya in two years!

  22. 22.

    Amanda in the South Bay

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    “10:08
    Amy Howe: The individual mandate survives as a tax.”

  23. 23.

    frapalinger

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    I’ve seen one Romney Bumpsticker. One.

  24. 24.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    WIN!!

  25. 25.

    homerhk

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    Mandate survives

  26. 26.

    Ordovician Bighorn Dolomite (formerly rarely seen poster Fe E)

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    Mandate survives as tax? Does that mean what I think it means?

  27. 27.

    Laertes

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    Woot.

  28. 28.

    Dave

    June 28, 2012 at 10:09 am

    BOOM goes the dynamite!! SCOTUSblog says the mandate is upheld.

  29. 29.

    flukebucket

    June 28, 2012 at 10:10 am

    Yesterday, I saw a Romney sticker on a Prius.

    GOProud?

  30. 30.

    TooManyJens

    June 28, 2012 at 10:10 am

    Individual mandate survives as a tax according to SCOTUSblog.

  31. 31.

    hildebrand

    June 28, 2012 at 10:10 am

    If it is upheld, the fire baggers will be screaming about why Obama sand bagged.the public option.

  32. 32.

    Tim F.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:10 am

    Bad? WTF? CNN said the mandate went down.

  33. 33.

    mothra

    June 28, 2012 at 10:10 am

    This is crazy.

  34. 34.

    Valdivia

    June 28, 2012 at 10:10 am

    enjoy your vacay mistermix

  35. 35.

    dmsilev

    June 28, 2012 at 10:10 am

    I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if a million conservatives cried out in terror and unfortunately were not suddenly silenced.

  36. 36.

    Quincy

    June 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

    Fanfuckingtastic

  37. 37.

    NonyNony

    June 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

    @Tim F.:

    They say “It’s very complicated, so we’re still figuring it out”

    Apparently the mandate is constitutional – I wonder what’s left in the opinion that is complicated.

  38. 38.

    butler

    June 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

    Per the liveblog!

    So the mandate is constitutional. Chief Justice Roberts joins the left of the Court

  39. 39.

    BGK

    June 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

    CNN briefly flashed a banner that the individual mandate was struck down. Now it’s back to the “Stolen valor” bit. Clowns.

  40. 40.

    TaMara (BHF)

    June 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

    6-3

  41. 41.

    Rorgg

    June 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

    “The insividual mandate survives as a tax.”

    Color me moderately surprised.

  42. 42.

    mothra

    June 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

    This is crazy.

  43. 43.

    hildebrand

    June 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

    If it is upheld, the fire baggers will be screaming about why Obama sand bagged.the public option.

  44. 44.

    Rorgg

    June 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

    “The insividual mandate survives as a tax.”

    Color me moderately surprised.

  45. 45.

    Anya

    June 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

    I am afraid to look. What’s the verdict?

  46. 46.

    Violet

    June 28, 2012 at 10:12 am

    Upheld? Holy cow!

  47. 47.

    Dave

    June 28, 2012 at 10:12 am

    Scalia’s head is going to pop. The Medicaid part was limited but not invalidated.

  48. 48.

    Tim F.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:12 am

    Is anyone here not following SCOTUSblog? God help their servers.

  49. 49.

    a hip hop artist from Idaho (fka Bella Q)

    June 28, 2012 at 10:12 am

    @flukebucket: FTW

  50. 50.

    TaMara (BHF)

    June 28, 2012 at 10:12 am

    6-3

  51. 51.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 28, 2012 at 10:12 am

    First announcement is made.

  52. 52.

    Judas Escargot, Your Postmodern Neighbor

    June 28, 2012 at 10:12 am

    Stuck in line at the DMV.

    Really wishing I was in front of a computer right now.

  53. 53.

    Rorgg

    June 28, 2012 at 10:12 am

    “The insividual mandate survives as a tax.”

    Color me moderately surprised.

  54. 54.

    Spectre

    June 28, 2012 at 10:12 am

    CNN says the mandate was killed. Msnbc says it survived. WTF.

  55. 55.

    cyntax

    June 28, 2012 at 10:12 am

    …but, according to SCOTUSblog, the opinion is “very complicated.”

    Medicare provision is limited but not invalidated.

  56. 56.

    TaMara (BHF)

    June 28, 2012 at 10:13 am

    6-3

  57. 57.

    Dave

    June 28, 2012 at 10:13 am

    The ACA is upheld as per ScotusBlog!!

  58. 58.

    Spectre

    June 28, 2012 at 10:13 am

    CNN says the mandate was killed. Msnbc says it survived. WTF.

  59. 59.

    tcolberg

    June 28, 2012 at 10:13 am

    SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein: The bottom line: the entire ACA is upheld, with the exception that the federal government’s power to terminate states’ Medicaid funds is narrowly read.

  60. 60.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:13 am

    The bottom line: the entire ACA is upheld, with the exception that the federal government’s power to terminate states’ Medicaid funds is narrowly read Scotus blog

  61. 61.

    askew

    June 28, 2012 at 10:13 am

    I would trust SCOTUSBlog over CNN.

    The Medicaid expansion is upheld but limited. That is encouraging. I thought that was going down.

  62. 62.

    Amanda in the South Bay

    June 28, 2012 at 10:14 am

    “Tom: The bottom line: the entire ACA is upheld, with the exception that the federal government’s power to terminate states’ Medicaid funds is narrowly read.”

  63. 63.

    butler

    June 28, 2012 at 10:14 am

    Scotusblog:

    Tom: The bottom line: the entire ACA is upheld, with the exception that the federal government’s power to terminate states’ Medicaid funds is narrowly read.

  64. 64.

    mothra

    June 28, 2012 at 10:14 am

    Upheld uphelp the individual mandate is upheld

  65. 65.

    PeakVT

    June 28, 2012 at 10:14 am

    I was wrong. Yay!

  66. 66.

    Culture of Truth

    June 28, 2012 at 10:14 am

    “Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, said Wednesday that President Obama will himself be monitoring the conversation on SCOTUSblog”

    ** TOUCHDOWN DANCE **

  67. 67.

    zzyzx

    June 28, 2012 at 10:14 am

    cnn.com still saying struck down.

  68. 68.

    lonesomerobot

    June 28, 2012 at 10:15 am

    It will be really funny if the big story from today is that CNN totally blew it on their breaking analysis (they said individual mandate was overturned)

  69. 69.

    Mark S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:15 am

    How is Fox going to spin this as a HUGE DEFEAT FOR OBAMA?

  70. 70.

    cyntax

    June 28, 2012 at 10:15 am

    From SCOTUSblog: “The bottom line: the entire ACA is upheld, with the exception that the federal government’s power to terminate states’ Medicaid funds is narrowly read.”

  71. 71.

    j

    June 28, 2012 at 10:15 am

    MSNBC and AP are saying SCOTUS has redefines the IM as a “tax”, so that sounds like it is OK.

    The entire thing has been upheld with the exception of the individual states right to set costs.

    IT can only be interpreted as a complete victory for Obama and the Democrats in congress.

  72. 72.

    zzyzx

    June 28, 2012 at 10:15 am

    cnn.com still saying struck down.

  73. 73.

    askew

    June 28, 2012 at 10:15 am

    The bottom line: the entire ACA is upheld, with the exception that the federal government’s power to terminate states’ Medicaid funds is narrowly read.

    Holy crap. That is excellent news.

  74. 74.

    Kirbster

    June 28, 2012 at 10:15 am

    On C-Span3, that’s a damned ugly mob out in front of the courthouse.

  75. 75.

    Bullsmith

    June 28, 2012 at 10:16 am

    The ACA survives intact it seems.

    Personally, I think the political calculation was that if you actually strike down ACA it would be like actually outlawing abortion at a federal level- it would energize the Dems more than the base. Now Romney and the team can run hard against Obamacare, instead of answering what they’d do instead.

    Honestly, I think Roberts was perfectly willing to trash his reputation for a partisan victory, but this one wasn’t worth it. Now our overlords will tell us how mavericky, independant and bipartisan he is for pretty much the rest of his life.

    God I’ve become cynical.

  76. 76.

    Death Panel Truck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:16 am

    Explains why Fat Tony was so pissed off the other day. He didn’t get his way on the ACA.

  77. 77.

    dmsilev

    June 28, 2012 at 10:16 am

    Huh. From ScotusBlog: “Tom: Chief Justice Roberts’ vote saved the ACA.”

  78. 78.

    ericblair

    June 28, 2012 at 10:16 am

    CNN website still says mandate struck down. Way to go with the credibility thing, dickheads.

  79. 79.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 10:16 am

    @dmsilev:

    YEEEEEHAWWWWWW argle bargle

  80. 80.

    Laertes

    June 28, 2012 at 10:16 am

    “Chief Justice Roberts’ vote saved the ACA.” – Tom Goldstein @ SCOTUSBLOG

    Did not see that one coming. The court isn’t quite what I thought it had become. This is a nice surprise.

  81. 81.

    Nicole

    June 28, 2012 at 10:17 am

    Oh thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster!

    Except CNN is claiming they struck down the mandate. Help? What’s the deal?

    EDIT: Never mind. Faux Lite has corrected themselves.

  82. 82.

    PeakVT

    June 28, 2012 at 10:17 am

    Interesting that it was only 5-4 to uphold (current reporting). Kennedy ended up to the right of Roberts.

  83. 83.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:17 am

    Roberts could NOT jump that shark. Too far for a Chief Justice, of HIS court legacy.

  84. 84.

    Chris

    June 28, 2012 at 10:17 am

    Well, you win some, you lose some, and we won this one.

  85. 85.

    Zifnab

    June 28, 2012 at 10:17 am

    Well shit. Finally Roberts calls a strike in our favor. I’m slightly less pissed at the Dem Senate for letting him through confirmations six years ago.

  86. 86.

    dmsilev

    June 28, 2012 at 10:18 am

    Meanwhile, in traditional media the New York Times just says “Supreme Court rules on Health Care” without actually saying what the decision is. Cmon, guys, you’re 5 minutes behind the curve…

  87. 87.

    Maude

    June 28, 2012 at 10:18 am

    It’s the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

  88. 88.

    handsmile

    June 28, 2012 at 10:18 am

    @Valdivia:

    Now you can get yourself to bed! You’ve earned yourself a good long nap!

    “The entire law upheld.”

    WIN! WIN! WIN! for our team!!

  89. 89.

    burnspbesq

    June 28, 2012 at 10:18 am

    @hildebrand:

    If it is upheld, the fire baggers will be screaming about why Obama sand bagged.the public option

    Put em in a soundproof room and let em scream all they want.

  90. 90.

    Soonergrunt

    June 28, 2012 at 10:18 am

    @dmsilev: That’s awesome.

  91. 91.

    Cap'n Magic

    June 28, 2012 at 10:18 am

    Now lets see what Mr. Market does today, now that ACA survives.

  92. 92.

    flukebucket

    June 28, 2012 at 10:18 am

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    Son of a bitch!! LOL!

  93. 93.

    askew

    June 28, 2012 at 10:18 am

    @Culture of Truth:

    “Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, said Wednesday that President Obama will himself be monitoring the conversation on SCOTUSblog”

    That’s pretty cool. I hope he comes out and makes an announcement about the decision.

  94. 94.

    Killjoy

    June 28, 2012 at 10:19 am

    I shall quench my thirst for the tears of wingnuts today.

  95. 95.

    Brian R.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @Mark S.:

    I’m watching Fox News right now, and it’s almost as good as election night in 2008. Bill Hemmer is interviewing Karl Rove about how Republicans will move to repeal health care now.

    Megyn Kelly is now finding the silver lining that the Court may have upheld the ACA but it “clipped Congress’s wings” in trying to expand its commerce clause powers.

    And there’s a real sense that Roberts has betrayed the holy cause.

    God, it’s delightful.

  96. 96.

    Corbin Dallas Multipass

    June 28, 2012 at 10:19 am

    If I were CNN, I would be pretty embarrassed given all the other major media org headlines.

  97. 97.

    dmsilev

    June 28, 2012 at 10:20 am

    @Soonergrunt: Better is CNN, who currently is saying this:

    In a landmark decision that will impact the nation for decades, the Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a key provision of President Barack Obama’s health care law, ruling that requiring people to have health insurance violates the Constitution.

    Oops.

    Compare with actual text from the ruling, via SCOTUSblog:

    The money quote from the section on the mandate: Our precedent demonstrates that Congress had the power to impose the exaction in Section 5000A under the taxing power, and that Section 5000A need not be read to do more than impose a tax. This is sufficient to sustain it.

  98. 98.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:20 am

    CNN fucks up again. CBS says upheld. Toobin needs a new line of work

  99. 99.

    Comrade Mary

    June 28, 2012 at 10:20 am

    Oh, man. I had been hoping against hope that it was upheld, but I didn’t dare say anything because I was also hoping to get my first contract since freakin’ December and that came through a few days ago, so I didn’t want to be greedy and upset the gods. Or the cats. Or whoever runs things.

  100. 100.

    tomvox1

    June 28, 2012 at 10:20 am

    @ericblair:

    Now it says:

    Correction: The Supreme Court backs all parts of President Obama’s signature health care law.

    Lazarus not dead at all actually. Oops. LOL.
    Gotta say I am giddy. Suck it, GOP. And Scalia. Hahahahaha… Too early for champagne?

  101. 101.

    ericblair

    June 28, 2012 at 10:20 am

    CNN issues correction: “backs all parts of President’s law”. Nice work, jerkoffs, glad to see you’ve got the A team running the show on one of the biggest news days of the last four years.

  102. 102.

    eric

    June 28, 2012 at 10:20 am

    I never thought I would be tears-on-the-eyes happy that the Supreme Court upheld a Heritage Foundation based piece of legislation!!!!

    In many ways I hope that it starts us toward a saner health care policy, but for the millions of people this will help — a-effing-men

  103. 103.

    Alex S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:20 am

    Nice. I guess the only negative aspect is that Citizens United cannot be spun as the decision of a partisan Supreme Court anymore.

  104. 104.

    OGLiberal

    June 28, 2012 at 10:21 am

    Here’s the correction email alert I just got from CNN….this is not a spoof:

    Correction: The Supreme Court backs all parts of President Obama’s signature health care law, including the individual mandate that requires all to have health insurance.

    BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

  105. 105.

    Amanda in the South Bay

    June 28, 2012 at 10:21 am

    CNN now says “Court rules on Obamacare”

    They can’t even post the result as a headline? What wankers.

  106. 106.

    Amanda in the South Bay

    June 28, 2012 at 10:21 am

    CNN now says “Court rules on Obamacare”

    They can’t even post the result as a headline? What wankers.

  107. 107.

    SatanicPanic

    June 28, 2012 at 10:22 am

    Haha suck it wingnuts, looks like it’s been upheld

  108. 108.

    TaMara (BHF)

    June 28, 2012 at 10:22 am

    @Mark S.: I just checked in they have a big NOBAMA photo/banner and still haven’t admitted it was upheld. Denial, it’s a beautiful thing.

  109. 109.

    victory

    June 28, 2012 at 10:22 am

    CNN had it wrong for 10 minutes saying it was struck down! That is an eternity on teh internets!

  110. 110.

    Linnaeus

    June 28, 2012 at 10:22 am

    Awesome. Now let’s get to work on making health care law & policy even better.

  111. 111.

    dmsilev

    June 28, 2012 at 10:22 am

    CNN wins todays “Excellence in Reporting” award…

  112. 112.

    Anya

    June 28, 2012 at 10:22 am

    That sound you hear is wingnut heads exploding.

  113. 113.

    Linnaeus

    June 28, 2012 at 10:23 am

    Awesome. Now let’s get to work on making health care law & policy even better.

  114. 114.

    joes527

    June 28, 2012 at 10:23 am

    Copied from that other thread:

    Am I correct that the gestalt of this entire session is that Scalia go spanked?

    So while our courts may do stupid and partisan things (I’m looking at you, CU) it isn’t totally corrupt.

  115. 115.

    TaMara (BHF)

    June 28, 2012 at 10:23 am

    @Mark S.: I just checked in they have a big NOBAMA photo/banner and still haven’t admitted it was upheld. Denial, it’s a beautiful thing.

  116. 116.

    Ash

    June 28, 2012 at 10:23 am

    I’m pretty sure we’re all just living in The Matrix right now.

  117. 117.

    Scott S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:24 am

    I’m feeling dim this morning. What does “upheld as a tax” mean? Is it throwing an easy out to Boehner to zero out the funding as a tax?

    Sorry to be so slow-witted this morning. I’m operating without orange juice… :(

  118. 118.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 28, 2012 at 10:24 am

    CNN’s take is ‘The court struck down mandates, so Obama lost. That the court determining the mandate is actually a tax, and that tax passes muster, and the legislation with it, is irrelevant.’

    As bad as Fox.

  119. 119.

    Jeff Schmitz

    June 28, 2012 at 10:24 am

    Prepare for wingnuts to scream, “ROBERTS IS THE NEW SOUTER!!!1!!”

  120. 120.

    sloan

    June 28, 2012 at 10:24 am

    I think I’ll watch Fox “News” for the first time in years just for laughs.

  121. 121.

    CarolineBlue

    June 28, 2012 at 10:25 am

    Ha! CNN most trusted name in news my behind! More like ‘Most Busted Name in News!’

  122. 122.

    PeakVT

    June 28, 2012 at 10:25 am

    Current liveblog seems to indicate that the while the whole thing has been upheld, some of the enforcement mechanisms have been nixed. Might be important, might not.

  123. 123.

    liberal

    June 28, 2012 at 10:26 am

    @beltane:

    Yeah, no matter the outcome the GOP must be destroyed if we want to have nice things as a country.

    FTFY.

    In addition, it would be nice if the Democratic Party leadership starting thinking that way.

  124. 124.

    shortstop

    June 28, 2012 at 10:27 am

    Damn, this is (understandably) loading slowly. This is such wonderful, wonderful news.

    Am I understanding correctly that Kennedy opined against the mandate? I know from SCOTUSblog that Roberts joined the left of the court.

  125. 125.

    Sarah, Proud and Tall

    June 28, 2012 at 10:27 am

    Wheeeeeeeee!

    The sound of wingnut heads exploding is deafening.

  126. 126.

    Lojasmo

    June 28, 2012 at 10:27 am

    Never thought I would say “thank you, Chief Justice Roberts.”

  127. 127.

    Steeplejack

    June 28, 2012 at 10:27 am

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    Why, you . . . you–fuckhead!

  128. 128.

    eric

    June 28, 2012 at 10:28 am

    They still said outside commerce clause powers — INSANE

  129. 129.

    MrSnrub

    June 28, 2012 at 10:28 am

    @zzyzx:

    CNN: Dewey defeats ACA

  130. 130.

    shortstop

    June 28, 2012 at 10:28 am

    Never mind–just saw Kennedy is reading from the dissent.

  131. 131.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 10:28 am

    the court struck down the mandate under commerce clause grounds, but upheld it 5-4 under the power of congress to levy taxes.

  132. 132.

    one two seven

    June 28, 2012 at 10:28 am

    It seems like CNN’s misreading came from the fact that the opinion stated that the mandate violated the commerce clause, but that since the mandate is actually a tax that doesn’t really matter.

  133. 133.

    Mark S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:28 am

    Lyle: Kennedy is reading from the dissent.

    Oh please please please tell me Scalia wrote his own dissent.

  134. 134.

    Omnes Omnibus

    June 28, 2012 at 10:28 am

    @dmsilev: It sounds like the Court didn’t touch on the Commerce Clause issue. Weird that Kennedy went with the Right.

  135. 135.

    butler

    June 28, 2012 at 10:28 am

    @Scott S.: The Court ruled that the mandate was not possible under the Commerce clause, but it was possible under Congress’s powers to tax. No, they can’t just zero it out without repealing or replacing it.

  136. 136.

    Alex S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:28 am

    CNN is such a joke… maybe they looked only at Kennedy’s vote and ignored Roberts, or maybe they trusted some anonymous source (probably an optimistic republican one).
    Roberts being the fifth vote is really interesting. He’s either concerned of his legacy or he’s helping insurance companies. Kennedy’s vote is disappointing.

  137. 137.

    Valdivia

    June 28, 2012 at 10:28 am

    @handsmile:

    Thank you handsmile. :)

    Now I am too excited to sleep. I will wait for later to have that drink though.

  138. 138.

    Surreal American

    June 28, 2012 at 10:29 am

    Conservative court upholds Republican-inspired healthcare legislation.

    Film at 11!

  139. 139.

    Comrade Dread

    June 28, 2012 at 10:29 am

    Awesome. Now we just have to fight to make sure we maintain control of the White House or at least one house of Congress so we can stave off the GOP attempts to defund/kill it until people get used to the law and see some benefits from its implementation.

    I personally will always remember that it was the GOP that tried to price my wife out of the health insurance market.

  140. 140.

    Death Panel Truck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:29 am

    @dmsilev: And Dewey Defeats Truman.

  141. 141.

    dmsilev

    June 28, 2012 at 10:30 am

    Wonder whether any GOP representatives are going to be tempted to “spike the ball” in defiance of Boehner’s warning memo the other day?

  142. 142.

    Hubris

    June 28, 2012 at 10:30 am

    Secondary news: The delusional nature of Dennis G.’s racial fever dream is confirmed.

  143. 143.

    Legalize

    June 28, 2012 at 10:30 am

    Now John Roberts will get a taste of wingnut butt-hurt. It won’t be pretty for the Chief Justice.

  144. 144.

    Ordovician Bighorn Dolomite (formerly rarely seen poster Fe E)

    June 28, 2012 at 10:30 am

    @Mark S.:

    A very good question. I just checked and they are still trynig to figure out how to do that. They still have a huge NObamacare headline. and a small “breaking news update” tag above it.

  145. 145.

    Rommie

    June 28, 2012 at 10:31 am

    Mr. Broccoli Mandate is having a sad…

  146. 146.

    Cap'n Magic

    June 28, 2012 at 10:31 am

    Kennedy’s dissent: “In our view, the entire Act before us is invalid in its entirety.”

  147. 147.

    Alex S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:31 am

    Kennedy says that it is the opinion of the minority that the entire act is invalid. Wow…. Absolutely crazy.

  148. 148.

    Linda Featheringill

    June 28, 2012 at 10:32 am

    Remember guys, we didn’t promise Boehner that we wouldn’t dance in the streets if it broke our way.

    [happy dance, happy dance, happy dance]

  149. 149.

    eric

    June 28, 2012 at 10:32 am

    @shortstop: I think that this radical, ideological dissent will come to define Kennedy among scholars in a less than flattering way, given the perception of him as a traditional “centrist’ vote.

    My take: Scalia’s tirades from the bench have been directed at ROBERTS the entire time, as condescending lectures for abandoning true conservative jurisprudence.

  150. 150.

    Slightly_peeved

    June 28, 2012 at 10:32 am

    Grats people! That decision actually makes sense. The idea that rewarding or punishing particular purchases with tax increases or decreases could be unconstitutional boggles the mind, without even bringing the Commerce Clause into it.

    Eta: what, they said it couldn’t pass muster under the commerce clause? That’s screwed up. But, still one more step towards making the health insurers utilities.

  151. 151.

    The Snarxist Formerly Known as Kryptik

    June 28, 2012 at 10:32 am

    @shortstop:

    He’s doing the dissent and says he and the rest of the minority would’ve held the law invalidated as a whole.

  152. 152.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 10:33 am

    @Mark S.:

    mr. swing vote says the whole act should have been struck down.

  153. 153.

    Culture of Truth

    June 28, 2012 at 10:33 am

    Is it throwing an easy out to Boehner to zero out the funding as a tax?

    It’s not a question of funding.

  154. 154.

    The Tragically Flip

    June 28, 2012 at 10:33 am

    I’m amazed that people here think this vindicates the Roberts court as a legitimately functioning institution.

    1) Roberts found the mandate unconstitutional under the Commerce clause, but gave himself an out on the taxing power. He still voted to overturn decades of commerce clause legal interpretation.

    2) It was still 5-4, when 19 out of 21 legal scholars thought it was slam dunk constituitonal, it barely survives.

    No, don’t put me on the “reassured” list. If you just desperately want to believe SCOTUS works as intented, I guess you can prop up that fiction a bit longer on this, but it should never have been this close.

  155. 155.

    ericblair

    June 28, 2012 at 10:33 am

    @Mark S.:

    Oh please please please tell me Scalia wrote his own dissent.

    I’m wondering whether the Supreme Court loosened obscenity restrictions on TV channels so that Scalia could read his dissent on the air.

  156. 156.

    Original Lee

    June 28, 2012 at 10:34 am

    @LGRooney: You appear to be correct. I heard some stuff on the radio on the way in to work, where actual true facts about the mandate were actually allowed on the air (for instance, the Republicans were for the mandate before they were against it), so I was wondering if there was some leakage. Whew.

  157. 157.

    Tripod

    June 28, 2012 at 10:34 am

    CNN goes with Supreme Court defeats Obama. The journalistic equivalent of having watery shit running down their legs in public.

    Nice going.

  158. 158.

    Spectre

    June 28, 2012 at 10:34 am

    I think the republicans knew this was going down, which is why they went forward with the Holder thing, to try to change the story

    Their rage is glorious!

  159. 159.

    Zagloba

    June 28, 2012 at 10:35 am

    Yeah, apparently Kennedy went full wingnut, called the entire act unconstitutional.

  160. 160.

    zmulls

    June 28, 2012 at 10:35 am

    It seems to me that Roberts split the baby. He didn’t want to have a Dred Scott decision on his hands. He went along with “it violates the Commerce clause” but said “well, it really is a tax so on that narrow basis I will affirm.” Very neat dancing on the top of that pin.

    I’m really surprised to see Kennedy leading the dissent, with Roberts on the other side. I would have thought Kennedy and Roberts were going to track together.

    And it makes my heart sink that Kennedy is moving slowly that far to the right…it doesn’t bode well for future decisions.

  161. 161.

    RossInDetroit

    June 28, 2012 at 10:35 am

    But what about John McCain? Is this good news for him?

  162. 162.

    Felinious Wench

    June 28, 2012 at 10:35 am

    Fuck.Yes.

    That is all.

  163. 163.

    EconWatcher

    June 28, 2012 at 10:36 am

    Question: will Roberts evolve further to the left, after he spends the next several months being denounced as a traitor and possible closet Kenyan, by all of his former allies?

    Remember, Harry Blackmun was a conservative when he first got on the Court, and used to vote with Warren Burger on everything (they called them the Minnesota twins). Then, partly as a result of some personal animosities that arose, Blackmun began a long slide to the left flank.

  164. 164.

    Anya

    June 28, 2012 at 10:36 am

    @dmsilev: It just shows that CNN was ready with that headline. THey expected SCATUS to struck down the law. It’s like writing celebrity obituaries in advance.

  165. 165.

    LAC

    June 28, 2012 at 10:36 am

    Yes, please take a vacation. Get some sun and smell the grass (the green sort) – your doom, gloom and cynicism is just exhausting.

    Get out and vote, folks and stay positive!!

  166. 166.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:36 am

    @Cap’n Magic:

    I kind of suspect a little ass covering by Roberts and Kennedy, of making this a 5 to 4 decision, with Roberts taking the wrath from the right wing. Leaving it still a bitter divide between right and left, at least in spirit, though thankfully, not substance.

  167. 167.

    burnspbesq

    June 28, 2012 at 10:36 am

    To their credit, the yahoos at Volokh are being pretty gracious about the court stealing their pony.

  168. 168.

    Zach

    June 28, 2012 at 10:37 am

    A million law professors just creamed/frothed their undies. This will be heralded as the new stitch in time. I don’t know if it is, but that is how it will be portrayed by law professors (i suspect).

  169. 169.

    jwb

    June 28, 2012 at 10:37 am

    @frapalinger: we drove straight through the heart of flyover country. Would not have thought there was an election going on. No campaign billboards, exactly one bumper sticker–and that for Obama.

  170. 170.

    Frankensteinbeck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:37 am

    Celestia, Luna, and Cadence. THANK YOU. We’d have survived, but a very, very good law has remained intact under partisan pressure in the realms of insanity.

  171. 171.

    Kay

    June 28, 2012 at 10:37 am

    With this outcome, everyone gets what they want,health care for the uninsured, something to be angry about for the right.
    — @mattyglesias via TweetDeck

  172. 172.

    pseudonymous in nc

    June 28, 2012 at 10:37 am

    My guess in advance was something like a 6-3 with Roberts writing an opinion that basically guts Commerce Clause precedent in exchange for giving a green light to this particular law. Horse-trading on the bench.

  173. 173.

    j

    June 28, 2012 at 10:37 am

    The wingnut blogs are going nuts. I think they all need to be put on suicide watch. Except Red State, which has nary a word about the ruling. Maybe they already offed themselves.

  174. 174.

    Thymezone

    June 28, 2012 at 10:38 am

    Best day since Election Day 2008. Great news. The Three Stooges Plus Kennedy weren’t enough to keep America from being a first world country today.

    Lots of work to do in future congresses to improve the healthcare situation, but this is a worthy first step.

    And to all the naysayers and “Kill the bill” idiots who roamed these hallways and others, only a couple of years ago? Fuck you, very much, and the donkeys you rode in on.

    And Mitt Romney? Go ahead, run against your own healthcare bill now, you sorry emtpy suit piece of crap. Do it, please, so that we can hand you the ass whipping you so richly (pun intended) deserve. Please, build your campaign around it.

  175. 175.

    joes527

    June 28, 2012 at 10:38 am

    @Cap’n Magic:

    Kennedy’s dissent: “In our view, the entire Act before us is invalid in its entirety.”

    Is there a legalism in that, or is it just really, really bad writing?

  176. 176.

    burnspbesq

    June 28, 2012 at 10:38 am

    The opinion is now up on the supreme court website. It’s 193 pages.

  177. 177.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 10:38 am

    honestly right now i don’t give a shit about the politics. untold tens of millions of americans will now have access to affordable healthcare.

  178. 178.

    Frankensteinbeck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:38 am

    Celestia, Luna, and Cadence. THANK YOU. We’d have survived, but a very, very good law has remained intact under partisan pressure in the realms of insanity.

  179. 179.

    dmsilev

    June 28, 2012 at 10:38 am

    Random wingnut in the RedState comment section:

    I believe, and I hate to say it, that this is pure politics.
    Roberts just delivered the election to Romney, and I think that was deliberate.

    I used to speak Wingnut, but my fluency has waned somewhat. Can anyone interpret this?

  180. 180.

    PeakVT

    June 28, 2012 at 10:38 am

    @PeakVT: Typo at SCOTUSblog. Tom: Apologies – you can’t refuse to pay the tax; typo. The only effect of not complying with the mandate is that you pay the tax.

  181. 181.

    The Tragically Flip

    June 28, 2012 at 10:38 am

    @zmulls:

    It seems to me that Roberts split the baby. He didn’t want to have a Dred Scott decision on his hands. He went along with “it violates the Commerce clause” but said “well, it really is a tax so on that narrow basis I will affirm.” Very neat dancing on the top of that pin.

    Exactly. And even so, four Supreme Court justices just found that Congress does not have the power to impose a $500 tax on all Americans that is waived if they provide proof of health insurance. Forget the commerce clause stuff, I shudder to think what type of bizarre wingnut logic could support that claim. Maybe they’ll rule the 16th Amendment unconsitutional next?

  182. 182.

    Xecky Gilchrist

    June 28, 2012 at 10:38 am

    Awww MAN we wasted a perfectly good EMOPROG CURL UP AND DIE or several million of them.

  183. 183.

    CaseyL

    June 28, 2012 at 10:39 am

    I first went to TPM, where they said Roberts had voted to uphold the mandate; then I went to CNN, which said the mandate had been overturned.

    When I saw that the Court had unequivocably upheld the law, I was stunned, then I screamed “Thank You!,” and then I cried.

    I honestly did not expect this. I was sure the law would be overturned. I can’t express how relieved I am.

    (Also very pleased, on purely parochial terms, that this kicks Rob McKenna in the nuts and hopefully undermines his campaign for governor of Washington.)

  184. 184.

    eric

    June 28, 2012 at 10:39 am

    Roberts is just another unelected Obama czar.

  185. 185.

    Punchy

    June 28, 2012 at 10:39 am

    My take: Scalia’s tirades from the bench have been directed at ROBERTS the entire time, as condescending lectures for abandoning true conservative REPUBLICAN jurisprudence.

    Fixed

  186. 186.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:39 am

    @EconWatcher:

    I think Roberst tried to retain a shred of federalist creds by justifying his vote as a tax issue, rather than the boogyman commerce clause. And noting that diff in his affirmation.

  187. 187.

    flukebucket

    June 28, 2012 at 10:39 am

    Well I have heard 6-3 and 5-4. Still scanning internet for 7-2, 8-1 and unanimous.

  188. 188.

    Cacti

    June 28, 2012 at 10:39 am

    I was wrong. I figured either 6-3 in favor, or 5-4 against.

  189. 189.

    Comrade Mary

    June 28, 2012 at 10:40 am

    Fucking CNN and fucking framing: their new headline is “Correction: U.S. Supreme Court upholds President Obama’s health care law to make Americans buy health insurance.” Because the President is a big meanie.

  190. 190.

    RossInDetroit

    June 28, 2012 at 10:40 am

    In 4 years all of the features of the ACA will be so well accepted that anyone who proposes repealing it will be looked on with pity like one of Paul’s gold standard loonies.
    This is a big play in a very long game. And today everyone won whether they wanted to or not.

  191. 191.

    dr. bloor

    June 28, 2012 at 10:40 am

    @Alex S.:

    Kennedy says that it is the opinion of the minority that the entire act is invalid. Wow…. Absolutely crazy.

    The thing that struck me during oral arguments about Kennedy’s questions was that he didn’t seem to be probing, he really seemed quite confused about the nature of the arguments at times.

    I’m not sure whose frontal lobes are going faster, his or Fat Tony’s, although I’d bet one of them is down with a stroke before Obama finishes his second term.

  192. 192.

    GregB

    June 28, 2012 at 10:40 am

    Eat your broccoli mofos!

  193. 193.

    Scott S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:40 am

    Surprised to hear Kennedy saying he wanted to throw the whole thing out. Sounds like we misjudged the level of his conservatism all along — he’s just as crazy as Alito or Scalia.

  194. 194.

    Cheap Jim

    June 28, 2012 at 10:40 am

    Isn’t the “whole act invalid” more about the severability question?

  195. 195.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    June 28, 2012 at 10:41 am

    @Slightly_peeved: I think this is an attempt to limit what the government can claim under Commerce.

  196. 196.

    Hal

    June 28, 2012 at 10:41 am

    Wow. I’m fucking stunned since everyone has been so doom and gloom everywhere since March.

    Can someone give Joe Biden a microphone to repeat his this is a big fucking deal again?

    Oh, and has Scalia hemorrhaged yet? Maybe he’ll resign in disgust like he promised to do if Gore was elected.

  197. 197.

    KXB

    June 28, 2012 at 10:42 am

    I guess CNN has its own version of “Dewey Defeats Truman”

    While I am a bit relieved, it should not have been close. This law may have been controversial and unpopular, but it was clearly written to be constitutional. That a nation of 300 million has to sit by their radios, TV, and computers to find out how these 9 decide, based not on law, but on their own political prejudices is unsettling.

  198. 198.

    PeakVT

    June 28, 2012 at 10:42 am

    PPACA ruling.

  199. 199.

    RedKitten

    June 28, 2012 at 10:42 am

    Heh.

  200. 200.

    JPL

    June 28, 2012 at 10:42 am

    @Kay: I am eating my words on the previous blog. I am in shock.

  201. 201.

    Steeplejack

    June 28, 2012 at 10:42 am

    @Alex S.:

    I rewound the DVR. Initial CNN report was by Kate Baldwin at 10:07, quoting “producer Phil [Bill?] Mears.”

    Baldwin:

    The individual mandate is not a valid exercise of the Commerce Clause. So it appears as if the Supreme Court justices have struck down the individual mandate–the centerpiece of the health care legislation.

    Then CNN slapped up a banner saying “Supreme Ct. Kills Individual Mandate.” Good times.

  202. 202.

    Southern Beale

    June 28, 2012 at 10:42 am

    Meanwhile, the “liberal” CNN failed to anticipate this ….

    http://southernbeale.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/your-liberal-media-cnn-edition/

  203. 203.

    joes527

    June 28, 2012 at 10:43 am

    Balloon Juice needs another hamster this morning.

  204. 204.

    zmulls

    June 28, 2012 at 10:43 am

    It may be too much to expect a slow evolution on the CJ’s part, but it’s not out of the question.

    After a few years of getting spittle on him from Scalia, Roberts (who’s genteelness is part of his self-image) may be thinking “Man, these guys are fricking NUTS. Maybe I don’t agree with them as much as I thought I did….”

    One can hope….

  205. 205.

    TooManyJens

    June 28, 2012 at 10:44 am

    @EconWatcher:

    Question: will Roberts evolve further to the left, after he spends the next several months being denounced as a traitor and possible closet Kenyan, by all of his former allies?

    I’m wondering this too. He’s going to find out what his “allies” are made of.

  206. 206.

    Brian R.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:44 am

    I bet Fox News is going to be describing John Roberts as an Obama appointee within the hour.

  207. 207.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:44 am

    @dmsilev:

    Punt

  208. 208.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 10:44 am

    reading this decision, roberts really walked the edge here. he got to get the court to put up a wall with regards to the scope of the commerce clause, but still uphold the mandate under other grounds.

  209. 209.

    Jim Pharo

    June 28, 2012 at 10:44 am

    The tax rationale is actually good news. We will come to think of this as something like paying taxes, rather than something like buying a tv. Given the GOP’s desire to play market-maker, I’m glad this is more like the fee you pay for a license plate than the digital tv converter the GOP gave me a $40 coupon for…

    Also, too: Methinks the Chief is concerned about his legacy. This may be even better news: the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court may have enough self-esteem left to care that he not be seen as the GOP’s top operative. Yay!

  210. 210.

    Keith G

    June 28, 2012 at 10:44 am

    Team Obama and democrats better get prepared for an energetic and vicious counter attack from now until november

  211. 211.

    hueyplong

    June 28, 2012 at 10:45 am

    1. A short and fairly half-hearted “told you so” from those of us who are lawyers and who got fairly tired of the scorn of non-lawyers so sure it was going to get struck down.

    2. It’s half-hearted because you lunatics were more right than I am comfortable acknowledging. 4 justices were totally happy with the crazy and remain willing to do a 180 on precedent purely as an exercise in starting with the desired political result and working back. Fat Tony is a total embarrassment at this point.

    3. Those who saw Fat Tony’s screed on AZ immigration as a hint of what was brewing were probably right. Fat Tony throws tantrums when he gets his diapers in a bunch.

    4. Nothing is ever over. Those who see “vote based on fears about the Supreme Court” as a weak reason to pick a particular president could not be more wrong.

  212. 212.

    Felanius Kootea

    June 28, 2012 at 10:46 am

    Oh my God I still can’t believe Roberts joined the majority decision and Kennedy went full metal wingnut!

  213. 213.

    Sasha

    June 28, 2012 at 10:46 am

    America … Fuck Yeah!

  214. 214.

    shortstop

    June 28, 2012 at 10:46 am

    @GregB: Love it.

    I’ll have to read this thread later when it’s loading faster. Meanwhile, I’m going to go cry in the shower (working at home). I knew two people well who died prematurely due to lack of health insurance, so this day means a great deal to me…as it does to us all.

  215. 215.

    burnspbesq

    June 28, 2012 at 10:47 am

    Can I get a “fuck you, Randy Barnett” from the congregation?

  216. 216.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 10:47 am

    @chopper:

    all i gotta say is, thank god for Hooper. the fact that the court was compelled to consider the alternate legal construction for the mandate (a ‘tax’ under article 1 sec. 8) is what saved it.

  217. 217.

    eric

    June 28, 2012 at 10:47 am

    @zmulls: You have to seriously wonder about that, given the vitriol from Scalia, which, as a write upstream, clearly was directed at Roberts for his apostasy.

  218. 218.

    kindness

    June 28, 2012 at 10:47 am

    I just went over to Redstate to see what the whiners are balling about re the decision.

    They’re crying their poor lil eyes out the big babies. The SCOTUS is no longer an American institution in their eyes now.

    Let’s all mail them pacifiers to make them feel better.

  219. 219.

    dr. bloor

    June 28, 2012 at 10:47 am

    @EconWatcher:

    Question: will Roberts evolve further to the left, after he spends the next several months being denounced as a traitor and possible closet Kenyan, by all of his former allies?

    I don’t really see Roberts going the Full Blackmun. He’s a smart guy, and he knows whose on his team. I think today was more about saving his legacy and upholding the corporate interests here rather than any sort of principled shift to the left or show of compassion on his part.

  220. 220.

    Josh Mandel's Drinking Buddy

    June 28, 2012 at 10:47 am

    Has Burnsy started his victory lap yet? I have half a mind to join him.

  221. 221.

    dr. bloor

    June 28, 2012 at 10:48 am

    @EconWatcher:

    Question: will Roberts evolve further to the left, after he spends the next several months being denounced as a traitor and possible closet Kenyan, by all of his former allies?

    I don’t really see Roberts going the Full Blackmun. He’s a smart guy, and he knows who’s on his team. I think today was more about saving his legacy and upholding the corporate interests here rather than any sort of principled shift to the left or show of compassion on his part.

  222. 222.

    AxelFoley

    June 28, 2012 at 10:48 am

    “Chief Justice Roberts’ vote saved the ACA.” – Tom Goldstein @ SCOTUSBLOG

    He owed President Obama for fucking up his swearing in. ;)

  223. 223.

    schrodinger's cat

    June 28, 2012 at 10:48 am

    Breathing a sigh of relief. Also too, CNN needs to die, when did they become this pathetic? I remember a time when they were good, they had Judy Woodruff and Bernie Shaw. They had some standards when Ted Turner was in charge.

  224. 224.

    GregB

    June 28, 2012 at 10:49 am

    So I take it Boehner need not worry about any spiking of the football from the GOP?

    Harr-de-harr!

  225. 225.

    Mark S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:49 am

    I can’t believe Scalia didn’t write his own opinion. It could have started “The Constitution is dead.”

  226. 226.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 10:49 am

    The real winners for liberals, should be that 50 million people will get their life saving insurance beginning in 2014, unless somehow the wingnuts can repeal it, which is highly unlikely, at best. And with each passing day, that will become harder to do.

  227. 227.

    Kane

    June 28, 2012 at 10:49 am

    How long before Romney takes credit?

  228. 228.

    SatanicPanic

    June 28, 2012 at 10:50 am

    @joes527: Kennedy is stupid in his stupidity

  229. 229.

    Ash

    June 28, 2012 at 10:50 am

    Part of me is super happy (the part of me that’s a woman and has a pre-existing condition) but mean, we’re just living in some super backwards twilight sort of place right now considering how this thing started and how it’s gotten to this place.

  230. 230.

    Davis X. Machina

    June 28, 2012 at 10:50 am

    @Xecky Gilchrist: Practice is never wasted…

  231. 231.

    Cacti

    June 28, 2012 at 10:51 am

    @dr. bloor:

    I don’t really see Roberts going the Full Blackmun. He’s a smart guy, and he knows whose on his team. I think today was more about saving his legacy and upholding the corporate interests here rather than any sort of principled shift to the left or show of compassion on his part.

    I see Roberts as more of a Melville Fuller (overly friendly to big business) than a Roger Taney-esque radical.

  232. 232.

    Violet

    June 28, 2012 at 10:51 am

    This is awesome. I had no idea how keyed up I was about this decision. I feel a massive sense of relief and I’m exhausted.

  233. 233.

    dmsilev

    June 28, 2012 at 10:51 am

    Erick son of Erick of the house of Erick:

    It’s a big win for the President and a bad day for freedom. But we can deal with it. It is not the end of the world, the republic, or freedom. It just means we have to fight harder.

    FREEDOM!!!!

  234. 234.

    giltay

    June 28, 2012 at 10:51 am

    Here’s the reaction to the CNN story from Canada.

  235. 235.

    Patricia Kayden

    June 28, 2012 at 10:52 am

    Wonderful and unexpected.

  236. 236.

    smedley

    June 28, 2012 at 10:52 am

    We now know that it is Kennedy, not Roberts, who will be remembered as the next Taney. Roberts, remember, allowed Kennedy to write the CU opinion.

  237. 237.

    AxelFoley

    June 28, 2012 at 10:52 am

    @Sasha:

    America … Fuck Yeah!

    Or:

    Obamacare…Fuck Yeah! Coming again, to save the mother fucking day yeah!

  238. 238.

    Chyron HR

    June 28, 2012 at 10:53 am

    @Keith G:

    Pffft. More like Roberts better get prepared for an energetic and vicious counter attack. And when I say “prepared”, I mean “a bulletproof car”.

  239. 239.

    Patricia Kayden

    June 28, 2012 at 10:53 am

    Wonderful and unexpected.

  240. 240.

    Brian R.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:53 am

    @giltay:

    Awesome.

  241. 241.

    Maude

    June 28, 2012 at 10:53 am

    @Steeplejack:
    They keep doing this. He didn’t listen for the next part of the decision. Other news organizations waited until they knew what was what.
    Being first and wrong is not good.

  242. 242.

    Kane

    June 28, 2012 at 10:54 am

    How is that broccoli workin’ out for ya?

  243. 243.

    MCA1

    June 28, 2012 at 10:55 am

    @The Tragically Flip: Agree with this. A win’s a win, and I’ll take it, but Kennedy’s falling in line with the hardcore and the fact this wasn’t at least 6-3 is disappointing. The narrow ruling by Roberts also tells us that at least 5 of the justices are itching for the chance to unravel Wickard, Loving and the rest of the Commerce Clause jurisprudence of the last 75 years. He may have just been too afraid to take that leap here. Which I guess is something of a blessing, but I don’t want “Not appearing to be a full-on rightwing radical as my legacy” to be our primary basis for assuming the Court will act rationally in the future. So, yeah, good end result and for the circumstances of the ACA, 5-4’s as good as 9-0, but as matter of legal precedent, this isn’t a great sign.

  244. 244.

    Alex S.

    June 28, 2012 at 10:55 am

    @Steeplejack:

    Ah, yes, they wanted to be the FIRST and couldn’t wait 5 more seconds.

    Now I wonder if the republicans are going to campaign against the ‘health-care tax’ or against the ‘liberal Supreme Court’.

  245. 245.

    Anya

    June 28, 2012 at 10:55 am

    This ruling highlights the importance of the SCATUS nomination. Dems voters need to keep in mind that if Gore had a clear win, we would have had two more liberal judges, instead of the asshole Alito and Chief Justice Roberts.

  246. 246.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    June 28, 2012 at 10:55 am

    Boy this must be huge, Ol’ Cranky Rupert is on Faux Nooz opining that the end of the world is coming. Just what we need, some rich SOB geezer Aussie opining on how bad this is for us regular people. Now he’s making excuses for splitting his publishing and entertainment companies, finally listing Faux Nooz as what it really is, “Entertainment”.

    Yes, but it’s entertainment for drooling idiots who have to be spoon-fed while angrily idling in their Hoverounds.

  247. 247.

    mothra

    June 28, 2012 at 10:55 am

    For good clean fun check out the reaction on Fox News

  248. 248.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 28, 2012 at 10:55 am

    I’d love some of whatever you people are smoking. Yeah, Roberts is worried about his legacy, going liberal, arglebargleblahblahblah.

    Corporations are people and Roberts is their representative on the court. He determined that striking down the mandate would adversely affect the corporate beneficiaries of said mandate. When corporations hurt, Roberts haz a sad.

  249. 249.

    Punchy

    June 28, 2012 at 10:55 am

    Why does John Boner even waste his breath with “WE HAF TO REPEEL THE WHOAL TH1NG IMMEDIATLNOWASAP!” Whats the fucking point of this, other than looking like an asshole? Does he REALLY think they can repeal and override a veto? WTF?

  250. 250.

    patroclus

    June 28, 2012 at 10:55 am

    I checked CNN early – man, the mandate is gone. That’s really disappointing…

  251. 251.

    Joey Maloney

    June 28, 2012 at 10:56 am

    Best possible outcome: a wingnut driven insane with rage assassinates the Chief Justice, Obama appoints Noam Chomsky to replace him, flowers and ponies all around.

    #notintendedtobeafactualstatement

  252. 252.

    Linnaeus

    June 28, 2012 at 10:56 am

    @dr. bloor:

    I don’t really see Roberts going the Full Blackmun. He’s a smart guy, and he knows whose on his team. I think today was more about saving his legacy and upholding the corporate interests here rather than any sort of principled shift to the left or show of compassion on his part.

    That’s exactly what I think is going on here. Roberts preferred to run for 3 yards and the minority wanted a deep pass.

  253. 253.

    Cacti

    June 28, 2012 at 10:56 am

    @smedley:

    We now know that it is Kennedy, not Roberts, who will be remembered as the next Taney. Roberts, remember, allowed Kennedy to write the CU opinion

    Bush v. Gore and Citizens United will be the legacy of Kennedy the “moderate”.

  254. 254.

    mothra

    June 28, 2012 at 10:56 am

    For good clean fun check out the reaction on Fox News

  255. 255.

    Xecky Gilchrist

    June 28, 2012 at 10:56 am

    @Chyron HR: Team Obama and democrats better get prepared for an energetic and vicious counter attack from now until november

    Yeah, I agree. The Republicans haven’t yet figured out a way to dial their opposition to Obama up past 11 where it’s been stuck since he was inaugurated, but there’s plenty of room for dusting off the “Activist Judges” contard death threats.

  256. 256.

    burnspbesq

    June 28, 2012 at 10:57 am

    David Bernstein’s rant at Volokh is priceless.

    http://www.volokh.com/2012/06/28/the-perils-of-shortsightedness/

  257. 257.

    one two seven

    June 28, 2012 at 10:57 am

    Lyle:
    The rejection of the Commerce Clause and Nec. and Proper Clause should be understood as a major blow to Congress’s authority to pass social welfare laws. Using the tax code — especially in the current political environment — to promote social welfare is going to be a very chancy proposition.

    This.

    This was a much more conservative opinion than the simplistic analysis you’ll hear all week is going to give it credit for.

  258. 258.

    hueyplong

    June 28, 2012 at 10:58 am

    FoxNews: Socialist Kenyan Muslim Usurper to ram broccoli down our throats. Wolverines!

  259. 259.

    PeakVT

    June 28, 2012 at 10:58 am

    The ruling contains 6 pages of summary, 59 pages from Roberts, 61 pages from Ginsburg, 65 pages from the loons, and 2 pages from Thomas in which he says, “and another thing!”.

  260. 260.

    JCT

    June 28, 2012 at 10:59 am

    For goodness’ sake — driving in this AM, stuck at a long light and took a look at CNN right after 10AM. Horrified. Long ride in.

    Get to work, dejectedly check TPM — WTF?

    Thanks CNN, you imbeciles.

    Meanwhile, I wonder what horse-trading went on with that decision, that dissent from Kennedy is completely nuts. Strike it all down? What?

  261. 261.

    gbear

    June 28, 2012 at 10:59 am

    If Bohner thinks that the Holder vote is going to trump this ACA news, he’s a fool. Today’s Holder vote is going to look incredibly petty and stupid to everyone except rabid gun freaks. No way that this isn’t Obama’s day today.

  262. 262.

    burnspbesq

    June 28, 2012 at 10:59 am

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    Just go away, you fuckheaded Fuckhead. Get it through that rotten melon of yours: the American people had a fucking GREAT week at the supreme court.

  263. 263.

    Spaghetti Lee

    June 28, 2012 at 11:00 am

    Well, I’m relieved. Rule of law and judicial restraint aren’t quite dead in this country. I’m not gonna say Roberts is taking a turn to the left-I mean, really?-but he’s at least not a complete nutjob.

    I am a bit worried about the particulars of the ruling that have been discussed. I guess the safest route would be not to bring any more major legislation before the court until Fat Tony croaks.

  264. 264.

    Creepy Jury Trials Permanently Penned Mr. Devon for Silvering Ordinary Camshafts

    June 28, 2012 at 11:00 am

    This is why elections matter, and especially this year’s election

  265. 265.

    PaulW

    June 28, 2012 at 11:00 am

    Don’t go thinking Roberts is a dye-hard (heh) librul now.

    He’s just a more honest conservative about federalism than the others on the Court.

  266. 266.

    Patricia Kayden

    June 28, 2012 at 11:00 am

    @RossInDetroit: Here here!!

  267. 267.

    Spectre

    June 28, 2012 at 11:01 am

    Co-sign with those saying this isn’t a turning point for Roberts. At the end of the day, he was supporting corporate interests, and backing a bill created by the heritage foundation.

    That said, still a good day!

  268. 268.

    suzanne

    June 28, 2012 at 11:02 am

    Oh. My. GOD.

    I’m beyond thrilled.

  269. 269.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 11:02 am

    love it. roberts’s opinion for the majority is like 60 pages, ginsburg’s opinion is like 60 pages, the dissent is like 60 pages and thomas’s dissent is 2 pages. LOL.

  270. 270.

    JGabriel

    June 28, 2012 at 11:02 am

    Roberts sided with Obama while Kennedy stayed on the right?

    My mind is boggled. Did not see that configuration coming — although it kind of makes sense now that I think about it. Roberts is always and foremost pro-business, and the insurance companies wanted the PPACA to survive too, especially since the alternative would be the expansion of Medicare to all.

    .

  271. 271.

    Scratch

    June 28, 2012 at 11:03 am

    If nothing else, this decision also reinforces how important it is that Obama is re-elected in November. There’s no way the American left can afford the chance of Romney choosing a replacement for Ginsburg.

    The other big hope would be that if Obama is re-elected, he gets to make the nomination for Scalia’s replacement.

  272. 272.

    Birthmarker

    June 28, 2012 at 11:03 am

    Chuck Todd just said something stupid. I think I will now reinstitute my near total ban on cable news.

  273. 273.

    Death Panel Truck

    June 28, 2012 at 11:04 am

    From the SCOTUSblog:

    Amy Howe: By the way, the opinions collectively are a monster. The Chief’s opinion is 59 pages, Justice Ginsburg’s opinion is 61 pages, the four dissenters are 65 pages, followed by a short two-pager from Justice Thomas. You do the math.

    Two pages from Thomas. What a shocker. I guess it’s tough to tear yourself away from Internet porn long enough to, you know, actually work.

  274. 274.

    General Stuck

    June 28, 2012 at 11:05 am

    @one two seven:

    By leaving the regs in place, the Roberts using the tax clause is pretty hollow. The mandate was not the only element that was presumably justified by the CC. By leaving all the national regs in place they can only be justified by applying the CC to them. So the claim of unconstitutional being the mandate, or funding of a law, is confined to only that part of any future national social net law. And each new law with funding can now be justified as a tax for using to fund such laws. Which seems much more conducive and solid for making new deal like laws into the future. I don’t think a minority vote on the SCOTUS can be perceived as having any precedence, but not being a lawyer, could be wrong about that.

    IOW;s Roberts has actually expanded taxing powers by congress. seems to this dweeb

  275. 275.

    rlrr

    June 28, 2012 at 11:05 am

    @mothra:

    Good news for McCain….

  276. 276.

    JGabriel

    June 28, 2012 at 11:05 am

    @Just Some Fuckhead:

    Corporations are people and Roberts is their representative on the court. He determined that striking down the mandate would adversely affect the corporate beneficiaries of said mandate. When corporations hurt, Roberts haz a sad.

    Bingo! The big surprise, to me, is not Robert’s approval of PPACA but Kennedy’s dissent.

    .

  277. 277.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    June 28, 2012 at 11:05 am

    Ol’ Rupert Murderdoch on taxes: ‘taxes will go up, I will have less money, the economy will suffer.’ He really thinks everything revolves around him…lol! Neil Cavuto just wrapped up by licking Ol’ Rupert’s wrinkled sphincter and giving him a prostrate massage with his tongue.

    Neil is angling for a two hour show.

  278. 278.

    lacp

    June 28, 2012 at 11:05 am

    John Roberts: Islamokenyan or Homomarxist? We report, you decide.

  279. 279.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 11:06 am

    @Xecky Gilchrist:

    OTOH, obama just helped get 50 some-odd million working class americans access to affordable health care in the years ahead. that’s gotta resonate.

  280. 280.

    Violet

    June 28, 2012 at 11:07 am

    @chopper:

    roberts’s opinion for the majority is like 60 pages, ginsburg’s opinion is like 60 pages, the dissent is like 60 pages and thomas’s dissent is 2 pages. LOL.

    Gah, he’s such a empty suit.

  281. 281.

    Cacti

    June 28, 2012 at 11:07 am

    I think we can safely say now that the only way Kennedy and Scalia will leave SCOTUS with a Dem in office, is inside a pine box.

  282. 282.

    Culture of Truth

    June 28, 2012 at 11:07 am

    Roberts is a smart guy. Boehner is a moron.

  283. 283.

    Birthmarker

    June 28, 2012 at 11:08 am

    @Spectre: Pretty concise analysis. But as I said in the thread earlier this AM, the bill does limit profits, and rebates start in August for some consumers.

    The other rarely stated point–we as taxpayers have been paying the medical costs of the uninsured.

  284. 284.

    JoJo

    June 28, 2012 at 11:09 am

    There is much wailing and gnashing of teeth on Free Republic today. Sweet!

  285. 285.

    The Moar You Know

    June 28, 2012 at 11:09 am

    Why does John Boner even waste his breath with “WE HAF TO REPEEL THE WHOAL TH1NG IMMEDIATLNOWASAP!” Whats the fucking point of this, other than looking like an asshole?

    @Punchy: He has a constituency, just like any other politician. This is what his constituency demanded. He’ll give it to them. It costs nothing but a few hours of time and will not pass, so what’s the harm?

    Boehner isn’t a newb at this game, he understands that his side is full of lunatics who are going to throw a tantrum regardless, so might as well pick a time and place to have it. Makes it easier to clean up afterward.

  286. 286.

    rlrr

    June 28, 2012 at 11:09 am

    @chopper:

    OTOH, obama just helped get 50 some-odd million working class americans access to affordable health care in the years ahead. that’s gotta resonate.

    That makes the GOP have a sad…

  287. 287.

    mikefromArlington

    June 28, 2012 at 11:09 am

    I coulda made a killing on intrade!

  288. 288.

    Violet

    June 28, 2012 at 11:09 am

    @lacp:

    John Roberts: Islamokenyan or Homomarxist? We report, you decide.

    I’m pretty sure I heard that John Roberts was educated in a madrassa.

  289. 289.

    joes527

    June 28, 2012 at 11:09 am

    Legal question:

    In the end, does any of the sound and fury coming out of the Justices’ pens mean anything beyond the binary : upheld?

    The whole upheld as tax but not under the commerce clause thing… Does that have any practical impact? Does it create a new precedent? Or does it just fail to create a precedent where it would have been handy to have one, and provide quotable quotes to a future court that might want to create a precedent in this area.

  290. 290.

    El Cid

    June 28, 2012 at 11:10 am

    I for one feel justified in steadfastly refusing to attempt to predict the ruling.

    However, nothing would have surprised me.

  291. 291.

    bemused

    June 28, 2012 at 11:10 am

    @Birthmarker:

    This made me burst out laughing. I must be slap happy. This will be a day of overwhelming mirth reading and watching all the incredibly stupid.

  292. 292.

    Birthmarker

    June 28, 2012 at 11:10 am

    @lacp: I lolled!!

  293. 293.

    eric

    June 28, 2012 at 11:10 am

    @burnspbesq: with this genious comment
    “The Federal Government exercises too much power. It is time that the States act in concert to curb the power of the same.”

    hmmmm. could that ever happen? Has it ever happened? let me think

  294. 294.

    handsmile

    June 28, 2012 at 11:11 am

    This decision outta make particularly entertaining the House contempt vote on Eric Holder scheduled for later today. Fat Tony’s ranting aria on Monday will seem but a lullabye when compared to what the wingnuts will spew when taking the floor to denounce the Kenyan Usurper’s Justice Department.

  295. 295.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 28, 2012 at 11:11 am

    @JGabriel:

    Bingo! The big surprise, to me, is not Robert’s approval of PPACA but Kennedy’s dissent.

    Yes, same here. I described him as “Principled Windsock Kennedy” on my Facebook page.

  296. 296.

    jwb

    June 28, 2012 at 11:11 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: it does explain why Scalia was so pissy Monday. Spent all that time leaving dead horses in Kennedy’s bed only to discover that he didn’t have Roberts in the bag. Still Kennedy’s vote here makes me wonder about future rulings on abortion, since Kennedy clearly signals that he’s thrown his lot with the wingnuts.

  297. 297.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 11:11 am

    @one two seven:

    not quite. yeah, they limited the commerce clause all right, but if you read the opinion it really does so on the whole ‘you can’t use the commerce clause to regulate a lack of commercial activity’.

    this law is pretty much on it’s own in that regard, and i don’t see too many social welfare laws coming down the pike that try to regulate commerce in that fashion.

    tho the right did get to say they put up a firebreak.

  298. 298.

    Hill Dweller

    June 28, 2012 at 11:11 am

    The cable news hacks are completely deflated. They look like a kid who was expecting a new bike on Christmas morning, only to find socks.

  299. 299.

    Martin

    June 28, 2012 at 11:12 am

    Not sure this is any kind of salvation for Roberts. He still voted in the best interests of corporations, which also happens to be the best interests of individuals given the options that are politically possible right now.

    Truly, the only losers here are conservatives.

  300. 300.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    June 28, 2012 at 11:12 am

    Nutpicked a real LOL at Redstate:

    Isn’t there a International Court or UN that we could go to and appeal this?

    Now that’s just fucking hilarious! They hate the International Courts and the U.N., yet Redstate member PatriotForLiberty asks if they can be saved by those same entities.

    Next up, Republicans ask for international elections monitors at conservative polling sites this fall!

  301. 301.

    Ash Can

    June 28, 2012 at 11:13 am

    @Death Panel Truck: I’m surprised he wrote anything at all (unless the justices are required to write something).

  302. 302.

    burnspbesq

    June 28, 2012 at 11:13 am

    SpaceJesus at LGF wins the day with:

    doing cartwheels through puddles of Wingnut tears

  303. 303.

    Brian R.

    June 28, 2012 at 11:13 am

    It looks like the Republicans are going to press ahead with full-on repeal now. Are they really that stupid?

  304. 304.

    Valdivia

    June 28, 2012 at 11:14 am

    @Birthmarker:

    and of course those who didn’t know the rebates were coming are going to accuse Obama of trying to buy the election with money to people.

  305. 305.

    Birthmarker

    June 28, 2012 at 11:14 am

    @Scratch: So true. Good time for one of the FPers to bump the donation thread.

  306. 306.

    scav

    June 28, 2012 at 11:14 am

    One difference is that Roberts will have highly trained logic slicers going after his body of work for as long as ‘mercan law is studied and they will be able to speak with an equal authority to his in many ways. Boehner isn’t — Boehner doesn’t much have to think past what he thinks will dominate the next news cycle on friendly channels reaching the choir as politics stands now.

  307. 307.

    JCT

    June 28, 2012 at 11:15 am

    To echo the comment upthread — we have to double-down on re-electing Obama and giving him a sane legislative partner. If this VERY moderate law narrowly missed going down, one can only imagine the havoc re: SCOYUS that would be created by President Romney and a batshit crazy Congress.

  308. 308.

    mdblanche

    June 28, 2012 at 11:17 am

    @butler: A switch in time to save nine?

    So, can we stop listening to the doomsayers now? Can people around here who really ought to know better stop paying attention to Village idiots whose track record is now something like 0 for ∞? You could cut the sense of despair around here (and many other places) with a knife for the past week or two while others spent hours furiously navel-gazing trying to predict the verdict using surplus Kremlinology tools. The only people who predicted this outcome are now being sheepishly released from their psych evals. So what did any of this accomplish? Are there really so many of us out there with nothing better to do than sit around feeling sorry for themselves, engaging in wild mass guessing, or worst of all reading the Washington Post editorial page? Are there really any of us out there who actually enjoyed doing that?

  309. 309.

    artem1s

    June 28, 2012 at 11:17 am

    so any predictions on how long it takes (R)Money to shake the etch-a-sketch and claim this decision as his victory?

    3, 2, 1….

  310. 310.

    Mike in NC

    June 28, 2012 at 11:17 am

    Mitt Romney’s response will be an attack ad that says “I was for RomneyCare before I was against ObamaCare” or something equally preposterous.

  311. 311.

    ericblair

    June 28, 2012 at 11:17 am

    @JGabriel:

    Roberts is always and foremost pro-business, and the insurance companies wanted the PPACA to survive too, especially since the alternative would be the expansion of Medicare to all.

    No: the likely alternative is continued decay of the current “system” such as it is. Every time social legislation is defeated it dies for a generation and comes back weaker. It doesn’t make the Promised Land rise from the ashes. Success begets success.

  312. 312.

    PeakVT

    June 28, 2012 at 11:17 am

    @joes527: I think with the length of the ruling it will be at least a few days before a consensus forms on the long-term implications.

  313. 313.

    Mnemosyne

    June 28, 2012 at 11:17 am

    I said from the beginning that Roberts was going to have to choose between Republican ideology and his devotion to corporations and that I didn’t think he was enough of an ideologue to vote with the other conservatives on something that would hurt corporations. And I don’t just mean healthcare corporations — I think part of Roberts’ calculation was that healthcare expenses are hurting all corporations and those expenses need to be brought under control for profits to flourish.

    I did think that Kennedy would go along with whatever Roberts’ position was, so I was wrong there. Still, a happy day overall, even if Roberts joined the left for (IMO) the wrong reasons.

  314. 314.

    mdblanche

    June 28, 2012 at 11:18 am

    @butler: A switch in time to save nine?

    So, can we stop listening to the doomsayers now? Can people around here who really ought to know better stop paying attention to Village idiots whose track record is now something like 0 for ∞? You could cut the sense of despair around here (and many other places) with a knife for the past week or two while others spent hours furiously navel-gazing trying to predict the verdict using surplus Kremlinology tools. The only people who predicted this outcome are now being sheepishly released from their psych evals. So what did any of this accomplish? Are there really so many of us out there with nothing better to do than sit around feeling sorry for themselves, engaging in wild mass guessing, or worst of all reading the Washington Post editorial page? Are there really any of us out there who actually enjoyed doing that?

  315. 315.

    Xecky Gilchrist

    June 28, 2012 at 11:18 am

    @chopper: I quite agree – sorry if I wasn’t clear, I think this is a big win for the Democratic side and for actual humans.

    Just saying that it’s silly to claim this will make congressional Redoublechins oppose Obama EVEN MORE!!! because, short of actual physical violence, how can they?

  316. 316.

    Valdivia

    June 28, 2012 at 11:18 am

    @Odie Hugh Manatee:

    ha ha ha. That is the funniest thing I have read today.

  317. 317.

    The Moar You Know

    June 28, 2012 at 11:20 am

    Isn’t there a International Court or UN that we could go to and appeal this?

    @Odie Hugh Manatee: I majored in psychology oh so long ago. There’s not a textbook in the world that has an example of “cognitive dissonance” that’s as good as that.

  318. 318.

    JGabriel

    June 28, 2012 at 11:21 am

    @JGabriel:

    The big surprise, to me, is not Robert’s approval of PPACA but Kennedy’s dissent.

    Let me re-phrase that: I’m not surprised that Kennedy dissented but that he dissented despite Roberts decision.

    .

  319. 319.

    PeakVT

    June 28, 2012 at 11:21 am

    OnPoint has a former Scalia clerk on (among others) and he sounds like someone just told him his puppy died. Hee-heeee.

  320. 320.

    dr. bloor

    June 28, 2012 at 11:23 am

    @chopper:

    this law is pretty much on it’s own in that regard, and i don’t see too many social welfare laws coming down the pike that try to regulate commerce in that fashion.

    Although Slimy Sam Alito will be relieved that the Islamokenyanfascist won’t be able to force burial cost mandates on Teh Murkin Peeples.

  321. 321.

    Birthmarker

    June 28, 2012 at 11:23 am

    @Odie Hugh Manatee: DougJ trolling?

  322. 322.

    lacp

    June 28, 2012 at 11:24 am

    @Odie Hugh Manatee: Now that is hilarious. These people really are insane – you probably wouldn’t have to go back more than a week to find a comment from the same person slamming all international organizations. Save us from Obamacare, Agenda 21!

  323. 323.

    SBJules

    June 28, 2012 at 11:24 am

    Love it, love it, love it. Go John Roberts (who knew?)

  324. 324.

    Ksmiami

    June 28, 2012 at 11:25 am

    @jwb: I’m vacationing in southern redder neck md and no Romney signs at all . He is not loved

  325. 325.

    slag

    June 28, 2012 at 11:26 am

    @Birthmarker: Agreed. I call spoof.

  326. 326.

    burnspbesq

    June 28, 2012 at 11:26 am

    It’ll be at least five years, and maybe ten, before we know whether this case represents a turning point in Commerce Clause jurisprudence.

  327. 327.

    cckids

    June 28, 2012 at 11:27 am

    @Mark S.: @Brian R.: Well, yeah. SATSQ. To infinity.

  328. 328.

    chopper

    June 28, 2012 at 11:28 am

    @dr. bloor:

    until alito actually looks into social security and realizes that he’s been forcibly paying for burial insurance for years.

  329. 329.

    feebog

    June 28, 2012 at 11:28 am

    I’m with Just Some Fuckhead on this one. Roberts saw the damage overturning the mandate would do to the insurance companies and figured a way out. Nothing more than that. Good outcome for the good guys, but don’t be surprised when Roberts continues to disappoint in the future.

  330. 330.

    Felanius Kootea

    June 28, 2012 at 11:31 am

    @giltay: CNN truly deserves that :).

  331. 331.

    jurassicpork

    June 28, 2012 at 11:31 am

    Here are some thumbtack observations on the SCOTUS upholding 99% of the ACA. More will follow as the SCOTUS’ decision is more deeply read and interpreted.

  332. 332.

    pseudonymous in nc

    June 28, 2012 at 11:32 am

    @JGabriel:

    Roberts sided with Obama while Kennedy stayed on the right?

    Roberts sided with “not wanting ‘Roberts Court’ to be synonymous with ‘letting people die and/or be bankrupted by judicial fiat’.”

  333. 333.

    Omnes Omnibus

    June 28, 2012 at 11:34 am

    @hueyplong: This.

    Also, I was wrong earlier in the thread; Roberts did not accept the Commerce Clause argument, but was okay with the tax one. I was basing it off the liveblog

  334. 334.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    June 28, 2012 at 11:38 am

    @Valdivia:
    @The Moar You Know:

    I just about choked to death reading that over there. The poor fools are so screwed up they are grasping at anything to ‘save’ themselves. Yeah, piss on people and/or organizations and then ask for their help when you think you’re in trouble.

    Sounds exactly like something a winger would do.

  335. 335.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    June 28, 2012 at 11:38 am

    @feebog:

    but don’t be surprised when Roberts continues to disappoint in the future.

    Don’t be a naysayer. Roberts is just a few unkind Redstate comments from turning into Wild Bill Douglas.

  336. 336.

    handsmile

    June 28, 2012 at 11:40 am

    Beyond upholding ACA, today’s decision rendered another victory for the American people:
    the expiration of CNN as a credible news organization. One might say it’s but the final nail in the coffin, but this morning’s fiasco indelibly carved “America’s Most Trusted News Source” on its tombstone.

    I’ll tramp the dirt down.

  337. 337.

    shortstop

    June 28, 2012 at 11:40 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: The SCOTUS liveblog never said that Roberts supported the CC arguments; just the opposite in all references to him.

  338. 338.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    June 28, 2012 at 11:45 am

    @Birthmarker:

    I’m almost thinking that’s the case, that or a reasonable facsimile of DougJ.

    @lacp:

    I’m really loving this decision just for the froth it has whipped up on the right. Most people are going to go ‘ok, the courts say that this is ok so I guess we see how it gets implemented. But not the wingers, nooooo. They want to triple down on repeal but by the time they get there too many people will learn that this is much better than what we had in the past.

    Or as another commenter at Redstate said:

    The majority of folks who are and have been against Obamacare, will now look at the law as being Constitutional. The Democrats will be looked at as doing something unpopular yet bold. The public will then, as a result, decide that they are now allowed to accept it and thus support it. Obama and the 2009-2010 Congress HAS changed America.

    A little reality leaks into Redstate. So far it has been ignored but yet it’s still there. :)

  339. 339.

    shortstop

    June 28, 2012 at 11:47 am

    @feebog: It’s a little more complicated than “windfall for the insurance companies.” Remember that the relatively small number of people who will have to pay for private insurance for the first time will be using that insurance, not paying premiums and continuing to go without care, and that denial for preexisting conditions, random rescissions and lifetime caps are where the real money is.

    I agree that this doesn’t signify a shift to the left for Roberts, but neither was this a purely corporatist decision, or he would have gone with those who wanted to overturn the entire act. (I don’t think it was a humanitarian decision on Roberts’ part, either–a self-interested one, to be sure.)

  340. 340.

    Brachiator

    June 28, 2012 at 11:50 am

    @Bullsmith:

    Personally, I think the political calculation was that if you actually strike down ACA it would be like actually outlawing abortion at a federal level- it would energize the Dems more than the base. Now Romney and the team can run hard against Obamacare, instead of answering what they’d do instead.

    That’s OK. Romney has been put on the defensive. He can promise to repeal it all he wants. But he would still have to get a repeal (and replacement) through Congress. He would have it far easier if the Court killed it.

    Honestly, I think Roberts was perfectly willing to trash his reputation for a partisan victory, but this one wasn’t worth it. Now our overlords will tell us how mavericky, independant and bipartisan he is for pretty much the rest of his life.

    I think that Roberts decided that he had to make a stand for the integrity of the Court. They read the newspapers too, and pay attention not only to public opinion, but possibly to the warnings of constitutional scholars that a purely political opinion risked turning the Court into an object of ridicule.

    And Roberts had to make the Court his, and not a Scalia rubberstamp.

  341. 341.

    Omnes Omnibus

    June 28, 2012 at 11:55 am

    @shortstop: I saw that Roberts’ opinion was based on the tax argument and thought that it meant he avoided the CC argument altogether. Like CNN, I jumped the gun. Mea culpa.

  342. 342.

    shortstop

    June 28, 2012 at 12:02 pm

    I just know that designated GOP spox Cathy McMorris-Rodgers or Rodgers-McMorris or whatever is going to have something prescient to say about all of this. As a token, she sure has a lot of spark and snap. Except for the spark and snap part.

  343. 343.

    quannlace

    June 28, 2012 at 12:15 pm

    How is Fox going to spin this as a HUGE DEFEAT FOR OBAMA?
    Reply

    I was curious about that too. As the pundit tsunami began, I went over to FOX to see how they were covering it. A very funereal feel, like somebody’s mother died, and Karl Rove concentrating on the one thing the court found invalid about ACA. Then five minutes later, it’s on to pastures new! Talking about the split-up of Murdoch’s media empire. And just waiting for Romney’s news conf.

  344. 344.

    Spectre

    June 28, 2012 at 12:24 pm

    http://i.imgur.com/hK9IG.jpg

  345. 345.

    tjmn

    June 28, 2012 at 2:36 pm

    @Anya: Good thing ACA was validated. Those whose heads are exploding about this will need that health care.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Albatrossity - Serengeti Day 2, Round 3 9
Image by Albatrossity (6/12/25)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

We did it!

We raised the 25,000 for The Civics Center, and with the external matches, that gives them $60,000 for this Spring effort!

You guys rock!

Recent Comments

  • way2blue on War for Ukraine Day 1,204: Off the Looking Glass & Through the Map (Jun 13, 2025 @ 3:41am)
  • Odie Hugh Manatee on Well, This is Fucking Horrifying (Jun 13, 2025 @ 3:04am)
  • Bruce K in ATH-GR on Well, This is Fucking Horrifying (Jun 13, 2025 @ 2:59am)
  • prostratedragon on Well, This is Fucking Horrifying (Jun 13, 2025 @ 2:24am)
  • No One of Consequence on Well, This is Fucking Horrifying (Jun 13, 2025 @ 2:20am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!