• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

In my day, never was longer.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

Relentless negativity is not a sign that you are more realistic.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

Nothing says ‘pro-life’ like letting children go hungry.

Sometimes the world just tells you your cat is here.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

Let there be snark.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

Fear or fury? The choice is ours.

With all due respect and assumptions of good faith, please fuck off into the sun.

If America since Jan 2025 hasn’t broken your heart, you haven’t loved her enough.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Usually wrong but never in doubt

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

The arc of the moral universe does not bend itself. it is up to us to bend it.

I did not have this on my fuck 2025 bingo card.

The gop is a fucking disgrace.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Feeling some heat

Feeling some heat

by Kay|  August 15, 20128:36 am| 46 Comments

This post is in: All we want is life beyond the thunderdome

FacebookTweetEmail

A lot of you are aware of this because you watch Rachel Maddow:

If you live in Butler or Warren counties in the Republican-leaning suburbs of Cincinnati, you can vote for president beginning in October by going to a polling place in the evening or on weekends. Republican officials in those counties want to make it convenient for their residents to vote early and avoid long lines on Election Day.

But, if you live in Cincinnati, you’re out of luck. Republicans on the county election board are planning to end early voting in the city promptly at 5 p.m., and ban it completely on weekends, according to The Cincinnati Enquirer. The convenience, in other words, will not be extended to the city’s working people.
The sleazy politics behind the disparity is obvious. Hamilton County, which contains Cincinnati, is largely Democratic and voted solidly for Barack Obama in 2008. So did the other urban areas of Cleveland, Columbus and Akron, where Republicans, with the assistance of the Ohio secretary of state, Jon Husted, have already eliminated the extended hours for early voting.

County election boards in Ohio, a closely contested swing state, are evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. In counties likely to vote for President Obama, Republicans have voted against the extended hours, and Mr. Husted has broken the tie in their favor. (He said the counties couldn’t afford the long hours.) In counties likely to vote for Mitt Romney, Republicans have not objected to the extended hours.

Husted seems to be feeling some pressure from all the media attention, so is reconsidering:

Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, under growing pressure to resolve a contentious dispute over whether counties should have extra evening and weekend voting hours this fall, on Tuesday told The Enquirer he is moving toward a statewide order on the politically charged issue.

Recall what happened here. In 2010, Ohio Republicans pushed through still more restrictive laws on voting despite the fact that Ohio already has a voter ID law.

Democrats and allies responded by collecting enough signatures to put that new more restrictive voting law to a “citizen veto”, by qualifying the voter suppression law as a referendum on the 2012 ballot. That action stayed the law.

Ohio Republicans then repealed their own law rather than putting it to a statewide vote. Now Secretary of State Husted is relying on administrative rule changes and sleazy tactics like this to produce the same results he and his Party were unwilling to defend in the form of a ballot referendum. They wouldn’t put their voter suppression law to a statewide vote because they were afraid they would lose. Instead, they’re simply going around voters to put these measures in by administrative action.

These are the actions of desperate people. They ran on jobs, jobs, jobs, and all we’ve seen are laws targeting contraception and abortion, voter suppression attempts and union-busting; in other words, purely partisan appeals to their rabid voter and donor base. They’re governing for the 27%.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Let’s Do the Generation Gap Again
Next Post: Good News/Bad News »

Reader Interactions

46Comments

  1. 1.

    LosGatosCA

    August 15, 2012 at 8:42 am

    Pretty putrid people.

  2. 2.

    EconWatcher

    August 15, 2012 at 8:44 am

    I remember during the 2004 election seeing images of huge lines of people waiting to vote in Ohio. If I remember, reports were that some people were waiting 6 or 8 hours or ever more to vote. Absolutely absurd. That’s effectively a denial of the franchise. And it could well have tipped the election.

    I was pretty damn motivated to vote in that election, but I don’t recall if my work responsibilities that day would have allowed me to wait that long (I wasn’t in Ohio, so I didn’t have to). How many people just went home after trying to show up to vote?

  3. 3.

    Kay

    August 15, 2012 at 8:45 am

    @EconWatcher:

    Early voting solved that. It’s also REALLY POPULAR. People love it.

    Hence, Republicans go after early voting.

  4. 4.

    Cassidy

    August 15, 2012 at 8:48 am

    I’ve reached a point where I wish that people who identify as conservative or Republican would just stop breathing. The world would be a better place without them.

  5. 5.

    El Cid

    August 15, 2012 at 8:51 am

    More real voter fraud, or, rather, fraud in relation to ballots.

    Oops, I’m sorry, there’s no story here, because once again it’s Republicans attempting to manipulate elections, so IOKIYAR.

    East Longmeadow Select­man Enrique John “Jack” Villamaino III (R), a candidate for the Massachusetts state legislature, is reportedly being investigated for voter fraud. The Boston Globe reported today that the county’s District Attorney is looking into a possible “illegal scheme to cast absentee ballots on behalf of hundreds of voters in hope of winning a primary election.” The paper notes that:

    A friend of Villamaino’s who works in the East Longmeadow town clerk’s office is suspected of having changed the registrations in the office computers ­after work hours, according to one investigator who asked not to be named because the investigation is confidential.

    But it doesn’t matter because BOTH SIDES DO IT and Paul Ryan has blue eyes made all the more alluring when he’s staring at “numbers” being “crunched”.

  6. 6.

    Steve

    August 15, 2012 at 8:52 am

    It’s scary to think how many more purges and restrictive laws they could get away with if Republicans controlled the DOJ and the Voting Rights Division.

  7. 7.

    mamayaga

    August 15, 2012 at 8:53 am

    Every time I hear about these dirty tricks to make it hard for Dems to vote I wonder how it can possibly constitutional. I thought we were supposed to have equal protection under the law. How is this any different from the phone jamming a few years back that sent some Repubs to jail because it prevented people form getting rides to the polls?

  8. 8.

    El Cid

    August 15, 2012 at 8:53 am

    @Cassidy: Unfortunately, throughout history they’ve just refused to do that. They’re like some sort of infestation, I would say cockroaches but they’re a lot cleaner, less damaging, and easier to get rid of.

  9. 9.

    mamayaga

    August 15, 2012 at 8:55 am

    @Steve: Um, just a few years ago, they did and they did. Or was that snark?

  10. 10.

    Waynski

    August 15, 2012 at 8:55 am

    I think the reason he may be backing off is Romney is so bad. They believe they can steal a squeeker and get the national press to go along with it. Blatant thievery is another story though, even for our stenographers. I hope we see more backing off from Republicans as Romney continues to prance around the country stepping on his own dick and blaming Obama for it.

  11. 11.

    Kane

    August 15, 2012 at 8:56 am

    When the brightest hope for your party to win hinges upon voter suppression, you know that you have a problem.

  12. 12.

    smedley

    August 15, 2012 at 8:56 am

    Doesn’t this come under the purview of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment:

    “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty,

    or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within

    its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”?

  13. 13.

    Cassidy

    August 15, 2012 at 8:57 am

    @El Cid: I wish Obama would make a public statement against drinking anti-freeze; just say he’s totally against it and no one should do it and in his next term he’ll make it illegal.

  14. 14.

    El Cid

    August 15, 2012 at 8:58 am

    @mamayaga: One of the dangers to even moderately democratic governments like ours that you can’t control via abstract rule systems (Constitutions and the like) is that of parties who are fundamentally devoted to subversion and manipulation of the system.

    It’s not that it can’t be controlled or fought against in any way or over any time frame, but malevolent parties can get away with a lot for some period of time, and can use their power to manipulate the electoral means of throwing the bums out.

    And as we’ve seen and lived through, a lot of theft and damage can be committed during the time period when a potential check on such anti-democratic malevolence might be applied. Also, the more powerful such forces are, the weaker the checks on their behavior and the reprimands for past harms are likely to be.

  15. 15.

    Valdivia

    August 15, 2012 at 9:01 am

    well I hope the heat of the national spotlight continues so that the pressure really effects an uniform late hour standard in all precincts. Thanks as always for letting us know.

    Is the PA decision coming out today? Anyone know?

  16. 16.

    Steve

    August 15, 2012 at 9:02 am

    @mamayaga: No, it’s not snark. Yes, a few years ago the Republicans politicized the DOJ, but fortunately they didn’t have control of so many state governments, like they do today, to pass so many restrictive laws.

    The Obama DOJ is a huge part of the fight against discriminatory voting laws in Pennsylvania, Texas, and elsewhere. I’d like the firebaggers, and anyone else who thinks it doesn’t make a difference which party is in power, to think about that for a while. The campaign to elect “better Democrats” won’t get very far if all the Democratic voters have been disenfranchised by the time we get there.

  17. 17.

    Litlebritdifrnt

    August 15, 2012 at 9:05 am

    @Valdivia:

    The Judge refused to block the law,

    HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) – Judge refuses to halt Pennsylvania’s tough new voter identification law.

    Although that is from the AP with no link so we shall have to see.

  18. 18.

    mamayaga

    August 15, 2012 at 9:06 am

    @El Cid: Yeah, I know slimeballs will manipulate the system, no matter how good it looks on paper (that’s why ACLU gets a contribution from me every month). But the paper should provide meaningful leverage in pushing back. I’ve been disappointed by the Holder DOJ, in this and so many other areas, because it’s been late to the party on voter suppression. This has been building for years, and they’re just now, just before a presidential election, pushing back. They should have been seeking injunctions from the get go.

  19. 19.

    Kane

    August 15, 2012 at 9:09 am

    A lot of you are aware of this because you watch Rachel Maddow

    Thank goodness for Rachel. She is my daily dose of sanity.

  20. 20.

    Valdivia

    August 15, 2012 at 9:12 am

    @Litlebritdifrnt:

    so that means this goes to the state supreme court and all of it is on them. ugh.

  21. 21.

    El Cid

    August 15, 2012 at 9:13 am

    @mamayaga: It’s very difficult for the more liberal sector of the power elites to view, much less act upon the view, that the opposition party is largely a criminal enterprise.

  22. 22.

    RaflW

    August 15, 2012 at 9:13 am

    @El Cid:
    As usual, projection, thy name is Republican.

    One reason (not the main one, which is still suppressing Dem voters, of course) but one reason Repubs are so paranoid about fraud in elections is that they know they do it, so everyone else must, too.

    They probably can’t imagine that decent working class people don’t cheat on their taxes either. But when you file a 1040EZ based on one or two W2s, there’s not much left to hide in Bermuda. Huh.

  23. 23.

    Nemesis

    August 15, 2012 at 9:14 am

    The shit going down in Ohio makes my blood boil.

  24. 24.

    JPL

    August 15, 2012 at 9:19 am

    @Valdivia: Here’s a link

    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/20120815_Judge_upholds_Pa__voter_ID_law.html

    f..k

  25. 25.

    RaflW

    August 15, 2012 at 9:23 am

    @El Cid:

    Thus the essential role of an independent and active press. Many of us have been watching (and yelling on blogs) in horror as the GOP has abandoned the basic compact that both parties want a better America but disagree on how to get there.

    As the GOP has headed towards building a banana republic in service only to the rich, most in the press have maintained the self-delusion that Repubs haven’t gone power-lust insane.

    Can blogs and new media save us from rampant Broderism? I dunno. But we can’t depend on outlets like the WaPo & NTY, the shrinking three broadcast nets, etc.

  26. 26.

    Valdivia

    August 15, 2012 at 9:23 am

    @JPL:

    fucking asshole (the judge, obviously). sorry for the intemperate language. It is now in the hands of the messed up SC.

  27. 27.

    Dork

    August 15, 2012 at 9:23 am

    Why not just go the full monty and declare that the counties with urban areas cant afford to open their polls at all? Then declare a “compromise” to open it for 8 minutes at 10:17am on that Tuesday.

    After all, both sides do it.

  28. 28.

    terraformer

    August 15, 2012 at 9:24 am

    I know we’ve been reading about this kind of thing for it seems a decade now. And Kay and others are on top of it, outlining what’s happening and what’s being done to foil it.

    But…I remain amazed and dumbfounded that, election after election, these blatant actions to disenfranchise Democrats, and Democrats only, clearly, continue. And after an election, when all kinds of evidence of election-day shenanigans surface, we talk and talk about how we’re going to do something about it, next time. This has happened, is happening now, and if something isn’t done soon, will happen again and on and on.

    Where’s the outrage? Why is it only Rachel Maddow and the handful of other left-leaning hosts and programs and blogs care to talk about this and motivate action? I think I know the answer: yet another instance of media control by the oligarchy, stifling stories and suffocating dissent. And I the slow-motion train wreck that is our dwindling Democracy is only slowed some more, if that, but it does continue down the tracks.

  29. 29.

    bago

    August 15, 2012 at 9:26 am

    WKRePublican!

    Sorry, you have to get up pretty early to make jokes at this level.

  30. 30.

    Punchy

    August 15, 2012 at 9:26 am

    @Dork: I hear he’s about to issue 2 ballots per person in all the GOP districts, just in case any voter screws up his/her first ballot and needs to try again.

  31. 31.

    JenJen

    August 15, 2012 at 9:30 am

    Count me among those who live in Cincinnati (Hamilton County). The Republicans must he terrified this year, I mean, even Rove never pulled something quite this brazen.

    I was encouraged that I received an email last night from the editor of the Cincinnati Enquirer which ensured readers that the paper will continue its serial expose on vote suppression in Ohio. It struck me as a little odd, because I don’t recall ever receiving a similar letter, but good for them. Might help save their reputation all the way up until they endorse Mitt.

  32. 32.

    RaflW

    August 15, 2012 at 9:33 am

    @Dork:

    Or pull a Michigan, replace the urban governments with corporate lackeys.

    Once you’ve done that, you can have the corporations run computer simulations of how the poors will vote based on some “random” phone sampling and submit that rather than the mess, bother, and expense of unsightly lines at the polls.

    Saves a lot of money, and assures that George Orwell will win in the end.

  33. 33.

    Tokyokie

    August 15, 2012 at 9:33 am

    Husted is violating urban voters’ civil rights under color of law. That’s a federal crime, and the FBI should be dispatched to arrest his ass forthwith.

  34. 34.

    RedKitten

    August 15, 2012 at 9:39 am

    Thanks for posting this. I have several political-minded friends in Ohio, and hopefully they’ll spread this far and wide to their networks and will start raising a big stink about it.

  35. 35.

    Hill Dweller

    August 15, 2012 at 9:50 am

    @Valdivia:

    so that means this goes to the state supreme court and all of it is on them. ugh.

    From what I’ve read, the Penn SC has 3 Dems and 3 Republicans, but one of the Republicans is a moderate likely to side with the Dems.

    The state’s lawyer admitted there was no voter fraud and the law wasn’t going to prevent future fraud, but argued the legislature had the right to make the law, regardless of its discriminatory effects. I can’t believe the judge bought it.

    Hopefully the SC strikes it down.

  36. 36.

    BruinKid

    August 15, 2012 at 9:53 am

    Especially after how they were treated at state party conventions and being disenfranchised in several of them, you would think the Ron Paul crowd would be up in arms as well over these attempts at voter suppression in the name of “freedom” and “liberty”.

    Oh, what’s that? They’re silent so far and don’t seem to care? Oh right, I forgot. They only care when it’s their votes being suppressed by the GOP. When the GOP does it to black people, they couldn’t care less.

    Silly me, I thought they had some consistency in them.

  37. 37.

    Sloegin

    August 15, 2012 at 10:04 am

    If not equal protection clause, this would seem like a slam-dunk for slapping the voting rights act in Ohio.

  38. 38.

    Poopyman

    August 15, 2012 at 10:08 am

    @Hill Dweller: Per the Pgh Post-Gazette:

    The ACLU will appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court, which currently comprises three Republican and three Democratic justices. Republican Justice Joan Orie Melvin is suspended from the court while facing charges she improperly used court employees to campaign.

    Hmmm. A 3-3 tie is going to result in the lower court’s decision being upheld, isn’t it?

  39. 39.

    1badbaba3

    August 15, 2012 at 10:22 am

    @terraformer: To paraphrase Gil Scott-Heron; “The outrage will not be televised.” The information media has far more important matters to cover, like Kim K’s big butt (not that there’s anything wrong with that… big butts, that is). The media largely ignores the source of Obama’s support, like they did in ’08, until the tsunami swept through. Ohio and Pa. repuglikkkans are just trying keep it close so their loss doesn’t make people think of stompings and mudholes. Yeah, good luck with that guys and gals of the Reich. Everybody chill the fuck out, we got this!

  40. 40.

    rikyrah

    August 15, 2012 at 10:31 am

    The obviousness of this is what they can’t move away from, Kay. In every single case where there’s a Democratic leaning county, suddenly the Sec. of State can’t be bothered to expand voting?

    They aren’t even smart enough to do it for a couple of Democratic Counties so that they can try and BS it.
    And yes, the SOS is scared to go on the show and explain himself with Maddow.

    Though Schultz, Rev. Al and Larry O have also been on this story too.

  41. 41.

    a hip hop artist from Idaho (fka Bella Q)

    August 15, 2012 at 10:52 am

    @JenJen: I’ve been pleasantly surprised at the quality(!?!) of the reporting on voting issues by the Enquirer. Of course they’ll endorse for GOP, but still, the recent series has struck me as remarkable,

  42. 42.

    kuvasz

    August 15, 2012 at 11:21 am

    Lets hope that the ACLU cites Bush v Gore on protecting voter rights.

  43. 43.

    Ohio Mom

    August 15, 2012 at 11:56 am

    On a related note, being reliably Blue is the reason why the city of Cincinnati was split into two Congressional districts.

    Once upon a time the city was in one district and it sent Democrats to Congress. Then the Republicans in Columbus cut it more or less down the middle, with the western and eastern halves of the city both attached to large swathes of rural and Republican areas.

    As a result the city is currently represented by Steve “Stop that videotaping!” Chabot, and, for a little while more, Mean Jean (who will be replaced by another Republican, the Democrats aren’t even trying).

    So many ways to rig the vote, so little time.

  44. 44.

    Catfish N. Cod

    August 15, 2012 at 12:41 pm

    A pedantic but possibly important point: I don’t think they repealed the Ohio Voter ID law because they were afraid they’d *lose* that vote. I think it was because, whether they won or not, the fight to win that referendum would have MASSIVELY INCREASED DEMOCRATIC TURNOUT. Which would likely put control of the state house back in D hands, who would then repeal the law anyway. So they did it themselves because it’s better to poke your own eye out than let someone else do it to you.

  45. 45.

    cckids

    August 15, 2012 at 12:50 pm

    @kuvasz:

    Lets hope that the ACLU cites Bush v Gore on protecting voter rights.

    Except the winning side in Bush v Gore successfully argued to stop counting votes. . . .

  46. 46.

    Kathleen

    August 15, 2012 at 6:38 pm

    @JenJen: I’m shocked that the Enquirer is covering it! When I saw the email from the Enquirer I deleted it. I will not do that in the future. Thanks, Jen-Jen. I have voted early at the BOE downtown the past 2 elections and it’s great.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - PaulB - Olympic Peninsula: Lake Quinault Loop Drive 5
Image by PaulB (5/19/25)

Recent Comments

  • Jeffro on Medicaid cuts approved in the House (May 19, 2025 @ 11:24am)
  • prostratedragon on Monday Morning Open Thread: Another Week (May 19, 2025 @ 11:22am)
  • Bupalos on Monday Morning Open Thread: Another Week (May 19, 2025 @ 11:21am)
  • sab on Monday Morning Open Thread: Another Week (May 19, 2025 @ 11:21am)
  • Sure Lurkalot on Monday Morning Open Thread: Another Week (May 19, 2025 @ 11:21am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!