• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

This blog will pay for itself.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Bark louder, little dog.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Politicans / David Brooks Giving A Seminar At The Aspen Institute / Conversation fear

Conversation fear

by DougJ|  August 22, 20129:49 pm| 110 Comments

This post is in: David Brooks Giving A Seminar At The Aspen Institute, Election 2012, Our Awesome Meritocracy, Our Failed Media Experiment

FacebookTweetEmail

Someone please read the latest Brooks-Collins “Conversation” atrocity and summarize for me. If I tell myself, then I’ll have to kill myself.

I know I could just ignore it, but that’s like telling a heroin addict he doesn’t methadone.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Open Thread: GOP Stalwarts Dropping (Out) Like Flies
Next Post: Republican Candidate for Sheriff in New Hampshire Would Use Deadly Force to Prevent Abortions »

Reader Interactions

110Comments

  1. 1.

    gbear

    August 22, 2012 at 9:53 pm

    I’m not going to help you. Are you still hoping for a murder/suicide? You still banned from commenting?

  2. 2.

    DougJ

    August 22, 2012 at 9:53 pm

    @gbear:

    Hope isn’t a strong enough word.

  3. 3.

    Baud

    August 22, 2012 at 9:55 pm

    I read it. And I call bullshit. DougJ is writing those pieces for the New York Times. There is no way Gail and David are real human beings.

  4. 4.

    thalarctos

    August 22, 2012 at 9:56 pm

    I tried to read and summarize it for you, but my brain shut down halfway through.

    It’s just that simultaneously horrible and banal.

  5. 5.

    schrodinger's cat

    August 22, 2012 at 9:57 pm

    @DougJ: Instead why don’t you explain to us non-mathematicians but interested in math people
    about the contributions of the mathematician, you said was the best since Euclid. This was the first time I had ever heard of him.

  6. 6.

    scav

    August 22, 2012 at 9:58 pm

    @Baud: Exactly. Even Eliza had more spontaneity, humor and warmth.

  7. 7.

    pragmatism

    August 22, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    They both plugged thei books. VICTORY

  8. 8.

    DougJ

    August 22, 2012 at 10:00 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    That will take a lot of energy. But I till try later.

  9. 9.

    Triassic Sands

    August 22, 2012 at 10:00 pm

    Collins: David, welcome back from vacation.

    Brooks: Thanks. I’m an idiot and I have no idea what I’m talking about. My characterization of the GOP is ridiculous and everyone should just ignore me.

    That’s it in a nutshell.

  10. 10.

    beltane

    August 22, 2012 at 10:00 pm

    You expect me to read that? Without paying me? Sorry but life is too short.

  11. 11.

    arguingwithsignposts

    August 22, 2012 at 10:01 pm

    no fucking way.

  12. 12.

    Bnut

    August 22, 2012 at 10:03 pm

    I don’t know who has a bigger Ryan boner. Brooks for getting to remind us all again about how “brave” the Ryan Plan is, or Collins for telling us she loves how Ryan is a catfish noodler. Their chairs were positively sopping wet by the end of it I imagine.

  13. 13.

    Argon

    August 22, 2012 at 10:04 pm

    Summary: Dave Brooks is a git and a poor fact checker. Gail Collins is coasting through. Heck, both of them are coasting on this. Bleh.

  14. 14.

    SiubhanDuinne

    August 22, 2012 at 10:05 pm

    Tried.

    Couldn’t.

    Sorry.*

    *(not really)

  15. 15.

    ? Martin

    August 22, 2012 at 10:05 pm

    Why do you hate us, DougJ?

  16. 16.

    BD of MN

    August 22, 2012 at 10:06 pm

    I made it this far:

    One thing that people miss is how supple a strategist he is

    then I went looking for a screwdriver to poke into my brain to make it go away….

  17. 17.

    Comrade Mary

    August 22, 2012 at 10:06 pm

    This conversation makes much more sense.

  18. 18.

    Libby

    August 22, 2012 at 10:08 pm

    I’m not going to read it. I kicked the Brooks monkey off my back a couple of years ago. To the great improvement of my mental health. Not going there again. Not for love. Not for money.

  19. 19.

    Yutsano

    August 22, 2012 at 10:08 pm

    @Bnut: Bleach of brain now dammit. Dawgs. Oi.

  20. 20.

    amk

    August 22, 2012 at 10:09 pm

    @Triassic Sands: As small a nutshell as possible. Fucking assholes.

  21. 21.

    ? Martin

    August 22, 2012 at 10:14 pm

    Ok, if we need to nominate someone to read it, I nominate mclaren. My guess is the conversation will be entirely about pie.

  22. 22.

    jwb

    August 22, 2012 at 10:15 pm

    This particular conversation is full of awesome like this:

    David: …Ryan and I disagree on many things and have debated them. The American Enterprise Institute even made an e-book out of one of our debates.
    __
    Gail: You know that’s pretty cool, being an e-book with the vice-presidential nominee. I’m trying to imagine what the equivalent would have been 100 years ago. Publishing your correspondence with James Sherman? Somehow this seems much niftier.
    __
    David: I have enormous respect for Ryan and I regard most of the commentary I’ve read about him by people who’ve never even interviewed him to be ludicrous.

  23. 23.

    beltane

    August 22, 2012 at 10:16 pm

    I bet DougJ is reading this abomination as we speak. Better him than me.

  24. 24.

    Omnes Omnibus

    August 22, 2012 at 10:16 pm

    @Comrade Mary: Awesome.

  25. 25.

    MikeJ

    August 22, 2012 at 10:19 pm

    Conversation fear? Is DougJ of the appropriate age that getting high and trying to figure out REM lyrics was a dorm activity (that is, in the IRS records years)?

  26. 26.

    SiubhanDuinne

    August 22, 2012 at 10:23 pm

    @DougJ:

    DougJ, do you have an Erdös Number? I was just reading about Thurston and the Wiki article said he had an Erdös Number of 2. IANAM and was unfamiliar with this Higher Mathematics version of the Kevin Bacon Game.

  27. 27.

    Bruce S

    August 22, 2012 at 10:23 pm

    Please don’t do this. I read something I’m sensible enough to always ignore because it’s inconsequential bullshit that no one who has a life would spend time with. I thought there might be something especially egregious or entertaining based on your post, but it was just the same two bores perched at the New York Times recycling their banality. Who cares? Please don’t do this again. I’m not happy with you.

  28. 28.

    Percysowner

    August 22, 2012 at 10:24 pm

    Sorry, I don’t subscribe to the New York Times and I’m not going to use my limited number of hits on David Brooks. Someone else will have to take the hit.

  29. 29.

    amk

    August 22, 2012 at 10:25 pm

    Michelle Obama on vets’ hiring exceeding the target, both on numbers and time.

    “I thought this challenge was pretty ambitious,” Michelle Obama said at Florida’s Mayport Naval Station in a speech live-streamed by the Department of Defense to every U.S. military base around the world. “When we first started out, we only had two companies as our partners, and I wondered to myself how we were going to get from there to 100,000 new jobs in two years.”

    “But, fortunately, I didn’t have much time to sit around and worry, because before long, companies across this country started stepping up …. and today, I am so proud to announce that these 2,000 companies have not just met our challenge – they’ve exceeded it. As of today, they have hired or trained 125,000 veterans and military spouses – 125,000. And they’ve done it more than a year ahead of schedule. That’s pretty impressive”

  30. 30.

    schrodinger's cat

    August 22, 2012 at 10:25 pm

    @DougJ: Thanks that would be great. BTW I am back home from visiting friends near Rochester. We went to Canada this time to Niagara falls!

  31. 31.

    Anne Laurie

    August 22, 2012 at 10:26 pm

    You’re not being fair to Gail Collins, DougJ. Imagine being stuck with the job of baby-sitting David Brooks, which I have to assume is written into her employment contract. She does as good a job of trolling BoBo here as any spoof you’ve ever done — simultaneously praising Ryan’s catfish-noodling and saying:

    Gail: What Ryan is doing now is exactly what the Republicans did when Obama brought out his health care plan. All the allegedly serious fiscal conservatives wringing their hands about Medicare costs and taking tough stands. Then when the President actually did something about it, instead of complaining that his approach didn’t save enough, or that it would be inefficient, all the fiscal conservatives jumped up and howled: “He’s taking money away from seniors!”
    __
    David: I agree, I completely agree. But to be fair Romney and Ryan do have an incredibly brave and sensible Medicare reform package on offer. It’s written down. It’s on paper. I don’t see anything comparably brave from the Democratic side.

    David: …I don’t see how anybody can say that Ryan is unserious when, unlike most national pols, he actually has a budget detailed enough for C.B.O. to score.
    __
    Gail: Ryan is constantly bemoaning the huge amount of debt the Republicans rolled up during the Bush years, due to unfunded spending and tax cuts. It would be hard for me to take him seriously in any case, given that he did vote for all of it. But the least he could do was refrain from gearing up to do it all over again.

    Collins is offering actual political arguments, and Brooks is slobbering GOP talking points. Maybe she’s doing what I’d do in her position — trying to ensure that Brooks will be beaten to a pulp at some cocktail lounge during the Charlotte convention.

    Heck, if Brooks continues to self-satirize the GOP’s favorite flapdoodle so poorly & relentlessly, he might stand in danger during the Tampa convention. And not just from Hurricane Isaac, because I’m sure Rove has already given BoBo the secret password for the deeply serious & exclusive RNC afterhours party where he doesn’t have to worry about being accosted by vulgar strippers… of the female persuasion.

  32. 32.

    Ann Rynd

    August 22, 2012 at 10:26 pm

    I like Gail Collins. She made Sheamus on the car top a national hero. She seems to be able to pin prick Brooks’ bloated self love down to a simple obnoxious self referencing assholism by gently mocking him every time he tries to bloviate. Her Thursday and Saturday columns have a way of clearing the air after Brooks and that other young prick who’s name I can’t remember have stunk up the joint. She’s smart the way Modo used to be before her maidenhead grew back.

  33. 33.

    schrodinger's cat

    August 22, 2012 at 10:28 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: I know that it has something to do about the centrality of a node in a network. So you are probably talking about citation networks?

  34. 34.

    t jasper parnell

    August 22, 2012 at 10:29 pm

    They are playing a game in which the pundit who says the dumbest most mendacious thing wins. I call it a draw.

  35. 35.

    YellowJournalism

    August 22, 2012 at 10:33 pm

    Couldnt you ask us to do something easier and healthier for us, like chewing glass?

  36. 36.

    RosiesDad

    August 22, 2012 at 10:42 pm

    I made it this far:

    Brooks: Ryan is a triumphant mistake.

  37. 37.

    cckids

    August 22, 2012 at 10:43 pm

    Everyone do yourselves a favor, skip the article (believe me, it is summarized well enough here in the comments) and read the comments over there. Brooks should be dying of blood loss from the thousand & one cuts he’s receiving. Everyone calls bullshit on him & each & every one of the commenters is more informed about the Ryan budget, the CBO and how it works. Truly a work of art.

  38. 38.

    SiubhanDuinne

    August 22, 2012 at 10:44 pm

    @amk:
    I can’t tell you how happy this makes me.

  39. 39.

    jl

    August 22, 2012 at 10:46 pm

    I scanned the thing and decided it was too long and boring. Then the following caught my eye and I didn’t have to read anymore.

    ” David: You say the Ryan budget would roll up a huge amount of debt, but the C.B.O. disagrees. ”

    Brooks: ignorant or dishonest or stupid, which is it? And Collins lets it pass

    BTW, anyone know how they do these ‘talks’? How dishonest and fixed is it? People don’t talk that way, even if you transcribe it and fix up the grammar and take out the ums and buts and repeated prepositions.

    Is this totally bogus like those public affairs show ‘interviews’ you hear on radio sometimes where the schmucks are actually reading from a script?

    My impression is that however it started, it is typed up, smoothed and polished. That is, fake, just like the information gullible readers think they are getting from it.

  40. 40.

    Jules

    August 22, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    I had to stop reading at the cat fish noodling…

  41. 41.

    redshirt

    August 22, 2012 at 10:50 pm

    So this was what the Fall of Rome was like, except with TV and a series of connected tubes.

    Also, REM ruled. Back in the day. No longer, alas!

  42. 42.

    Dennis SGMM

    August 22, 2012 at 10:50 pm

    @cckids:
    Thank you for that! Bobo is so full of shit that he fertilizes people’s lawns on weekends for a few extra bucks.

  43. 43.

    amk

    August 22, 2012 at 10:51 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: It’s a great achievement. Wish the FP’ers here would run with it instead of trolling us with msm pundtwit crap.

  44. 44.

    Ann Rynd

    August 22, 2012 at 10:53 pm

    @jl: They’re not really talking. They email each other, someone edits it. Done. She hates to be in the same room as this schmuck.

  45. 45.

    SiubhanDuinne

    August 22, 2012 at 10:53 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    I

    I know that it has something to do about the centrality of a node in a network.

    ::panics, thinks to self oh god oh god what does that mean I can’t fake it I was a music major for pete’s sake::

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    So you are probably talking about citation networks?

    Yes, exactly.

  46. 46.

    Steve Yoder

    August 22, 2012 at 10:54 pm

    Very nice R.E.M. lyric in the title. Can I request some more Pavement? Should be easy to work in “mixing cocktails with a plastic-tipped cigar.”

  47. 47.

    Todd

    August 22, 2012 at 10:56 pm

    Holy Christ on a stick. That looks like bukkake video without the creativity, directorial finesse or good taste that are customarily trademarks of even the lowest forms of the art.

  48. 48.

    Chuck Butcher

    August 22, 2012 at 10:58 pm

    thanks DougJ, now I’d like to hurt myself – I guess I still like you enough to not summarize this mess or you’d be hurting yourself…
    Well, let me think about that some more…

  49. 49.

    Palli

    August 22, 2012 at 10:58 pm

    I want to ask Brooks “How is it brave for men to declare abortions illegal?”

  50. 50.

    mainmati

    August 22, 2012 at 11:00 pm

    Ok, I read the whole thing. Yes, this “dialogue” is very stilted and pretty silly. Still, I have always liked Gail Collins. She is smarter and wittier than Maureen Dowd, which means she’s also far more interesting than “Bobo”. In this dialogue, “Bobo” was predictably on the one hand/on the other hand about Ryan; frankly, he has become increasingly just as blah-blah as Doubtthat but with more creds. I’ve stopped reading either one.

    Basically, Bobo totally avoided the budget question (i.e. savage the domestic sector) while wringing his hands over Ryan’s lunatic tax proposals. Gail was ineffectual on that point but all in all Bobo mostly had a sad in this “dialogue”.

  51. 51.

    MikeJ

    August 22, 2012 at 11:01 pm

    @schrodinger’s cat: Niagara Falls? Slooooowly I turn. Step by step. Inch by inch….

  52. 52.

    jl

    August 22, 2012 at 11:01 pm

    @Palli: For the new new wingnut GOP, anything a real (white) he man does that takes or harms, justified or not, is brave. Everything else is girly stuff.

  53. 53.

    SiubhanDuinne

    August 22, 2012 at 11:01 pm

    @amk:

    Well, no reason we can’t have both. But yes, I’d love to see this story front-paged. Anne Laurie? You around?

  54. 54.

    divF

    August 22, 2012 at 11:05 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    Erdos number is the number of links through joint publications until you reach Paul Erdos, who was a prolific collaborator. If you wrote a joint paper with Erdos, your Erdos number is 1. If you wrote a joint paper with someone who wrote a joint paper with Erdos, your Erdos number is 2.

    A quick search indicates that my Erdos number is 4.

  55. 55.

    replicnt6

    August 22, 2012 at 11:06 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    So you are probably talking about citation networks?

    Yes, exactly.

    Well, for modest values of exactly.

    It’s not citations, it’s a co-authorship. Erdos wrote a shit ton of papers with a shit ton of co-authors. If you wrote a paper with someone who wrote a paper with Erdos, you’re Erdos number is 2. etc.

    It literally just occurred to me as I was writing this that I am a co-inventor on a patent with someone with an Erdos number of 2. I don’t suppose patents count, though. Sad.

  56. 56.

    amk

    August 22, 2012 at 11:08 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: Less of pundtwit porn and more of what this admin has done and is doing is my pony.

  57. 57.

    mainmati

    August 22, 2012 at 11:11 pm

    @Triassic Sands: Actually your summation is much better than mine. Kudos, dude.

  58. 58.

    DougJ

    August 22, 2012 at 11:19 pm

    @divF:

    I’m a 2.

  59. 59.

    Platonicspoof

    August 22, 2012 at 11:19 pm

    . . . and summarize for me.

    See cckids at comment 37.
    I don’t understand how a waste of the MSM like Brooks can be both so vacuous and so self-contradictory in one short conversation.

  60. 60.

    DougJ

    August 22, 2012 at 11:20 pm

    @Anne Laurie:

    Being from Massachusetts, you should know what smart babysitters do with unruly kids.

  61. 61.

    divF

    August 22, 2012 at 11:26 pm

    @replicnt6:
    Patents may count. Go to the Oakland University Erdos number web site where they define what counts as a link.

  62. 62.

    eric

    August 22, 2012 at 11:26 pm

    @DougJ: I refuse to release my Erdos number because the media would simply criticize me for it.

  63. 63.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    August 22, 2012 at 11:27 pm

    I drove past an Applebee’s yesterday and that’s as close to it as I will get.

    I hear the salad bar commentary sucks.

  64. 64.

    Redshift

    August 22, 2012 at 11:27 pm

    @jl:

    Brooks: ignorant or dishonest or stupid, which is it?

    That is definitely not an either-or question.

  65. 65.

    DougJ

    August 22, 2012 at 11:29 pm

    @eric:

    Does that mean it’s at least 13?

  66. 66.

    eric

    August 22, 2012 at 11:30 pm

    @Redshift: ah, many-valued illogic. a field exploding this summer across the heartland

  67. 67.

    eric

    August 22, 2012 at 11:31 pm

    @DougJ: it was 13 in 2010. now, well, let’s simply say that it is an imaginary number

  68. 68.

    Walker

    August 22, 2012 at 11:32 pm

    @divF:

    Anecdotally, I get that this is a fairly common number to have if you are a mathematician. Mine is also 4 (though I have been in CS the last decade).

  69. 69.

    DougJ

    August 22, 2012 at 11:33 pm

    @eric:

    What would it be under Paul Ryan’s tax plan?

  70. 70.

    divF

    August 22, 2012 at 11:34 pm

    @DougJ: You’re a *real* mathematician :) , as opposed to us computational types. I was surprised mine was as low as 4.

  71. 71.

    Sarah, Proud and Tall

    August 22, 2012 at 11:35 pm

    I read it. David Brooks wants to blow Paul Ryan. The end.

  72. 72.

    danielx

    August 22, 2012 at 11:35 pm

    @Redshift:

    Oh yes – these are not mutually exclusive categories, especially for David Brooks.

  73. 73.

    eric

    August 22, 2012 at 11:36 pm

    @DougJ: Planck length

  74. 74.

    Sly

    August 22, 2012 at 11:38 pm

    Collins: David, the world has inexplicably survived withut your wisdom for the past few days. What do you think of Paul Ryan?

    Brooks: His selection is a political disaster but a policy triumph. Don’t ask me how that makes sense. Just buy some shitty e-book.

    Collins: I love you.

    Brooks: Not nearly as much as I love Paul Ryan. He managed to convince other Congressional Republicans to sign on to a budget that they already agreed with despite the fact that everyone who isn’t a Republican who reads it hates it.

    Collins: I heard he kills animals with his bear hands or some other awesome shit. That’s way cooler than all this boring talk about vulture capitalism and tax avoidance. But Ryan talks about numbers too much. Snoozefest!

    Brooks: Obama talks about numbers, too. Both sides do it.

    Collins: And now Romney wants to talk about Medicare WTF?

    Brooks: It’s because he’s brave and serious, and we know that because he wrote his plan down on paper. (ed – I’m not making that up)

    Collins: And Ryan wants to talk about tax cuts but not loopholes. That seems implausible.

    Brooks: His plan is bravely and seriously implausible.

    Collins: I’m bummed none of the candidates served in the military and we’re gonna have to hear how awesome they are anyway because they never got caught fucking around on their wives or beating their kids.

    Brooks: Even though I know there’s no correlation, someone smarter than me who does actual research should find out if shitty fathers make shitty Presidents.

  75. 75.

    ? Martin

    August 22, 2012 at 11:49 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: The more interesting game is your Erdős–Bacon number. Danica McKellar has an Erdős–Bacon number of 6, as does Natalie Portman. Colin Firth has a number of 7.

    I suspect I have an Erdős number around 7 or so. It’s a little bit of a trek from him to general relativity. I’m too lazy to actually work it out, though.

    My wife has a Bacon number of 2.

  76. 76.

    MikeJ

    August 22, 2012 at 11:52 pm

    @? Martin: My Bacon is 2, if radio counts as entertainment.

  77. 77.

    Judge Crater

    August 22, 2012 at 11:53 pm

    Doomed. We are just doomed. This level of discourse is what the elites of doomed societies indulge in just before the center stops holding. Fatuous, self-absorbed, insensitive to the fraying fabric of government and society – this is what we can read from their ghastly dialogue.

    How we can repair our dysfunctional system is beyond me.

  78. 78.

    divF

    August 22, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @? Martin: If you have access to MathSciNet, you can find out your Erdos number

    http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/collaborationDistance.html

  79. 79.

    TheMightyTrowel

    August 22, 2012 at 11:57 pm

    @Sarah, Proud and Tall: Wants to or already did at the 08 convention and wants more?

  80. 80.

    Davis X. Machina

    August 22, 2012 at 11:58 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    ::panics, thinks to self oh god oh god what does that mean I can’t fake it I was a music major for pete’s sake::

    If you understand, and can give a coherent explanation of how transposing instruments work, and why they’re necessary/helpful, that’s just as good.

    There are many gifts, but only one Spirit….

  81. 81.

    Roger Moore

    August 22, 2012 at 11:59 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    I was just reading about Thurston and the Wiki article said he had an Erdös Number of 2. IANAM and was unfamiliar with this Higher Mathematics version of the Kevin Bacon Game.

    Some people have even put together an “Erdos-Bacon number” for people who have both published mathematics papers and appeared in movies. Richard Feynman has an Erdos-Bacon number of 6, the same as Natalie Portman.

  82. 82.

    burnspbesq

    August 23, 2012 at 12:05 am

    @RosiesDad:

    Brooks: Ryan is a triumphant mistake.

    I read that and envisioned Brooks singing Elvis Costello at karaoke night (“Brilliant Mistake”).

    I haven’t stopped puking yet.

  83. 83.

    DougJ

    August 23, 2012 at 12:06 am

    @burnspbesq:

    I had the same reaction.

  84. 84.

    SatanicPanic

    August 23, 2012 at 12:10 am

    I already read that dumbass column today about how 100% of women should vote for Romney. I tried to read this one, but I gave up. Brooks is a putz. Nothing more, just a putz. A boring-ass putz.

  85. 85.

    Mark S.

    August 23, 2012 at 12:16 am

    @Sly:

    That was awesome!

    But do pedos make good presidents?

  86. 86.

    Hill Dweller

    August 23, 2012 at 12:20 am

    I was watching Maddow on Letterman, and Romney’s welfare ad ran during the break. Willard is a soulless man.

  87. 87.

    Roger Moore

    August 23, 2012 at 12:20 am

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    Instead why don’t you explain to us non-mathematicians but interested in math people
    about the contributions of the mathematician, you said was the best since Euclid.

    To be very specific, he said he was the best geometer since Euclid. Everyone knows the best mathematician since Euclid- likely since creation- was Carl Friedrich Gauss.

  88. 88.

    Mark S.

    August 23, 2012 at 12:24 am

    Catching up on what I missed while at work:

    1. Couldn’t get thru more that two paragraphs of that “Mitt Romney is an alpha male and I want to suck his balls” piece at NRO.

    2. Read the wiki article on William Thurston, didn’t understand a word of it.

    Anything else happen today?

  89. 89.

    jl

    August 23, 2012 at 12:26 am

    @jwb:

    ” David: I have enormous respect for Ryan and I regard most of the commentary I’ve read about him by people who’ve never even interviewed him to be ludicrous. ”

    Would that include the commentary written in Brit Hume’s face when Ryan could not handle the easiest softball questions imaginable, and stammered, and stared like a deer in headlights?

    But then Hume is noted liberal, so his commentary probably biased, not objective.

  90. 90.

    tomvox1

    August 23, 2012 at 12:28 am

    Brooks: At least Ryan has a series of proposals that have been scored by the Congressional Budget Office. Under current policy, C.B.O. has the total public debt soaring from 74 percent of G.D.P. today to over 80 percent of G.D.P. by 2022. Under the last Ryan plan, C.B.O. projects that the debt will shrink to 63 percent of G.D.P. by 2022.

    Bullshit. That is a link to some deficit scold blog. It is not a link to a CBO score. Let’s see Brooks link to an independent analysis of Ryan’s proposals. Brooks is a fucking liar.

  91. 91.

    ? Martin

    August 23, 2012 at 12:30 am

    @divF: Cool! My Erdos number is 5. That’s quite a bit better than I thought. Erdos apparently co-authored with a number of physicists, so that shortened things up more than I expected.

    Now I again slightly regret not finishing up that math paper I was working on a bazillion years ago. That’d have gotten me down to 3. Instead I decided to marry someone who went on to have a Bacon number of 2. Made the right decision there.

  92. 92.

    burnspbesq

    August 23, 2012 at 12:30 am

    @Mark S.:

    Anything else happen today?

    The NCAA is investigating the recruitment of Nerlens Noel.

    The Calipari Hammer is fixin’ to come down on Kentucky, the same way it came down on UMass and Memphis. The guy should be a Republican Congressman: cheating comes as naturally as breathing.

    I warned you, Stuck, but did you listen?

  93. 93.

    Mark S.

    August 23, 2012 at 12:31 am

    I didn’t know Brooks was on vacation. But come to think of it, the world did seem a little less stupid lately.

  94. 94.

    RaflW

    August 23, 2012 at 12:31 am

    @cckids:

    Unfortunately the comments section at the NYT (or just about anywhere. Ahem) seems to do dick about Brooks actually responding to the 1,000s of fiskings he’s received there.

    No response, no change, no dice.

    He’s way too cushy in his $3mil mansion and pre-warmed PBS Friday TeeVee chair to bother to actually read or (gasp!) respond to reader feedback. That would sully his very special air of salad-bar superiority.

    (I don’t know what that last sentence means, but I like it that way.)

  95. 95.

    jl

    August 23, 2012 at 12:31 am

    @tomvox1:

    Be careful. Ryan’s preferred CBO analysis is the one he ordered up, and in which he instructed the CBO to accept his own insane supply side assumptions.

    And apparently that is the very same ‘objective’ CBO analysis that the abject and sleazy humbug Brooks cites in his fake talk with Collins.

  96. 96.

    Mark S.

    August 23, 2012 at 12:33 am

    @burnspbesq:

    That’s ok, Cal always moves on before the sanctions hit.

  97. 97.

    tomvox1

    August 23, 2012 at 12:37 am

    Brooks: At least Ryan has a series of proposals that have been scored by the Congressional Budget Office. Under current policy, C.B.O. has the total public debt soaring from 74 percent of G.D.P. today to over 80 percent of G.D.P. by 2022. Under the last Ryan plan, C.B.O. projects that the debt will shrink to 63 percent of G.D.P. by 2022.

    Bullshit. That is a link to some deficit scold blog. It is not a link to a CBO score. Let’s see Brooks link to an independent analysis of Ryan’s proposals. Brooks is a fucking liar.crfb.org/blogs/ryan-budget-long-term

  98. 98.

    tomvox1

    August 23, 2012 at 12:40 am

    @jl:

    No, it isn’t:

    http://crfb.org/blogs/ryan-budget-long-term

    It is a link to the “Committee for a Responsible Budget”, yet another Pete Peterson circle jerk.

  99. 99.

    dance around in your bones

    August 23, 2012 at 12:41 am

    David: I agree, I completely agree. But to be fair Romney and Ryan do have an incredibly brave and sensible Medicare reform package on offer. It’s written down. It’s on paper.

    Oh well, if it’s on paper…

    What fucking planet did this guy come from?

    ETA: Brooks would probably be happier if he was on methadone.

  100. 100.

    cckids

    August 23, 2012 at 12:49 am

    @RaflW:

    He’s way too cushy in his $3mil mansion and pre-warmed PBS Friday TeeVee chair to bother to actually read or (gasp!) respond to reader feedback. That would sully his very special air of salad-bar superiority.

    I like your last sentence too. I am 100% sure Brooks does not read the comments. He’d never write another word for publication, unless it was a whiny, “why are you all so meeeeeean?” diatribe.

    He probably has it written into his contract that he doesn’t have to read comments, or that no on can refer to the comment section in his presence.

  101. 101.

    dance around in your bones

    August 23, 2012 at 12:55 am

    If I knew what an Erdos number was I’m sure mine would be a one.

    Is that good?

  102. 102.

    MikeJ

    August 23, 2012 at 1:09 am

    @dance around in your bones: Paul Erdős is the Kevin Bacon of the maths world.

  103. 103.

    dance around in your bones

    August 23, 2012 at 1:30 am

    @MikeJ:

    Ooo! Ooo! Then I’m a six!

    (degrees of separation, that is. I suppose that’s all I can hope for in the mathematical world :(

  104. 104.

    evap

    August 23, 2012 at 6:00 am

    Proud to say I have Erdos number 2.

    A long-time collaborator has Erdos number 1 (that’s how I got my 2), but was also an extra in a movie as a teenager and has Bacon number 2. Erdos # + Bacon # = 3, now that is cool!

  105. 105.

    1badbaba3

    August 23, 2012 at 8:11 am

    Erdos numbers, n.y.times columnists, obscure three decades old musical references. Clearly I have stumbled into the egghead thread, as I understand none of it. I love it . More please.

  106. 106.

    Caravelle

    August 23, 2012 at 10:09 am

    @dance around in your bones : if you’ve never co-authored a scientific paper your Erdos number is infinity.

    @SiubhanDuinne: If you want to know more about Paul Erdos I recommend reading the book “The Man Who Loved Only Numbers”; it’s basically his biography. It does talk about maths and his importance to the math world, but even if you’re not interested in that stuff you should still read it for the weirdness of his life in general. He was the Ur-absent professor.

    @evap : wow indeed. There can’t be that many people with that number.

  107. 107.

    dance around in your bones

    August 23, 2012 at 11:02 am

    @Caravelle:

    @dance around in your bones : if you’ve never co-authored a scientific paper your Erdos number is infinity.

    Infinity is much cooler than one! Thanks!

  108. 108.

    steve

    August 23, 2012 at 12:44 pm

    I know I could just ignore it, but that’s like telling a heroin addict he doesn’t methadone.

    Is it really so hard to remember to type all the words in your sentences? Or proofread?

  109. 109.

    dance around in your bones

    August 23, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @steve: I think we can all fill them in, mentally.

    Not that I haven’t (mentally) considered offering my services as a proofreader on occasion.

  110. 110.

    dance around in your bones

    August 23, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    @steve: I think we can all fill them in, mentally.

    Not that I haven’t (mentally) considered offering my services as a proofreader on occasion.

    ETA: Gah. Server procrastination led to the double post. I NEVER hit submit twice, I swear to pasta.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Chris T. on Happy Diversions: Respite Open Thread (Mar 24, 2023 @ 3:04am)
  • laura on B-J After Dark Open Thread: FaFo in Utah (Mar 24, 2023 @ 3:03am)
  • Chetan Murthy on B-J After Dark Open Thread: FaFo in Utah (Mar 24, 2023 @ 3:02am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 393: Zelenskyy Goes to Kherson! (Mar 24, 2023 @ 3:01am)
  • billcinsd on B-J After Dark Open Thread: FaFo in Utah (Mar 24, 2023 @ 2:53am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!