• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Come on, man.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

American History and Black History Cannot Be Separated

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

šŸŽ¶ Those boots were made for mockin’ šŸŽµ

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Republicans in disarray!

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

ā€œWhat are Republicans afraid of?ā€ Everything.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

The revolution will be supervised.

This blog will pay for itself.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2012 / Late Night Open Thread: In Galtian Paradise, Irony Owns You!

Late Night Open Thread: In Galtian Paradise, Irony Owns You!

by Anne Laurie|  September 4, 20122:46 am| 103 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012, KULCHA!, Open Threads, Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail


__
Via commentor Sm*t Cl*de, via Sadly, No!, Tumblr “Shittiest Editorial Cartoon of the Moment” captures one for the ages. Straight from the Stalinist archives…

the editors of the National Review offer RNC conventioneers a special frameable update of the latest Republican heartthrobs, just in time for Labor Day. In their role as horny-handed sons of the Real American Soil(tm), Romney has plans, lots of plans, and Ryan has a book — possibly the Bible, possibly Ayn Rand, possibly Tom Friedman, let the audience decide!

Can you imagine the cries of butthurt outrage from the NR’s proud Cornerites — Katherine ‘K-Lo’ Lopez, Jonah “Doughy Pantload” Goldberg — if some filthy hippie cartoonist from the left-of-center (reality-based) community presented this historical tragedy as an actual joke?

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Drinking With Wonkette
Next Post: Early Morning Open Thread: Expensive, Empty Chairs »

Reader Interactions

103Comments

  1. 1.

    The prophet Nostradumbass

    September 4, 2012 at 2:48 am

    Oh god, that’s priceless.

  2. 2.

    Dee Loralei IPhone

    September 4, 2012 at 2:52 am

    That’s so bad parody commited suicide after murdering irony. Conservatives are very strange.

  3. 3.

    Bago

    September 4, 2012 at 3:01 am

    After irony committed suicide twice, It tied an onion to its belt, threw parody under the bus, and then jumped that bus over over a fucking shark.

    Either that or the artist just quit his job in style.

  4. 4.

    Linkmeister

    September 4, 2012 at 3:01 am

    Can they possibly be so dumb as not to realize what it looks like?

  5. 5.

    max

    September 4, 2012 at 3:04 am

    It’s those pals, Creator Eddie Haskell and Creator Wally! Eddie is looking away in rapture, entranced with the vision of his very own tax shelters being written directly into the tax code!

    Meanwhile, Wally is strangely drawn towards the sheer attractiveness of that construction worker’s ass. This conflicts with his crush on Ayn ‘Rhymes with Swine’ Rand in ways that are most discomforting.

    max
    [‘For instance, the construction worker is one of the masses but appears to working hard. And also, he’s way hotter than Ayn, and well, gee.’]

  6. 6.

    Tehanu

    September 4, 2012 at 3:04 am

    To “conservatives” art is only worthwhile when it acts as propaganda — art that isn’t propaganda is incomprehensible to them. Which is why they’re always bitching about how Atlas Tanked at the Box Office.

  7. 7.

    Jerzy Russian

    September 4, 2012 at 3:07 am

    You should see some of their illustrations of Ronald Reagan they did back in the 1990s. I was a student at Yale at the time, and William F. Buckley, Jr. apparently gave each of Yale’s libraries a free copy of the National Review. We used to read them for laughs. The free issues stopped coming after Bill Clinton was elected.

  8. 8.

    Jerzy Russian

    September 4, 2012 at 3:08 am

    @Linkmeister:

    Can they possibly be so dumb as not to realize what it looks like?

    Yes.

  9. 9.

    Richard

    September 4, 2012 at 3:11 am

    Damn. It makes you want to start singing the Soviet national anthem.

  10. 10.

    The prophet Nostradumbass

    September 4, 2012 at 3:11 am

    @max: Funny enough, the guy who played Eddie Haskell is a wingnut.

  11. 11.

    hhex65

    September 4, 2012 at 3:12 am

    An iPad could easily store about 100,000 of those scrolls, if there’s even anything on them– but carrying them around like that seems really inefficient.

  12. 12.

    Harold

    September 4, 2012 at 3:13 am

    This is the greatest thing since TIME put goatse on its cover.

    http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20040920,00.html

  13. 13.

    SiubhanDuinne

    September 4, 2012 at 3:13 am

    Since it’s an open thread, I just want to say how much I love all the fun the Obama team is having with fundraising. My inbox has the big excited announcement about having topped 3.1 million individual donors, followed by all kinds of stats (number of students, refugees, teachers and small business owners from swing states, etc.) all done up in different fonts and sizes like an old-fashioned circus poster.

    And in the middle of all this is this delightful tidbit:

    3 women donated for every 2 men
    –> 7,968 women named Michelle <–

    LOL, priceless!! Never in as many years as Mitt has dollars would it occur to the Rmoney folks to sort their donors by how many women were named Ann. And it's such a cool shout out to FLOTUS love! What an awesome bunch of folks.

  14. 14.

    SiubhanDuinne

    September 4, 2012 at 3:16 am

    @Tehanu:

    It also explains Jon McNaughton.

  15. 15.

    JGabriel

    September 4, 2012 at 3:17 am

    Jesus.

    Even before reading the post, I was thinking, “Wait, I recognize that style. There’s a name for it. What was called again … Soviet Realism! That’s it!”

    So, when I finally get to the body of the post, imagine my utter frustration when I realize, “Goddammit, National Review already stole my joke, AND THEY DIDN’T EVEN GET THE JOKE!”

    Clueless bastards.

    .

  16. 16.

    Richard

    September 4, 2012 at 3:21 am

    With plans formulated by Ayn Rand, Romney/Ryan in that cover image are off to build a steaming pile of bullshit.

  17. 17.

    The prophet Nostradumbass

    September 4, 2012 at 3:21 am

    @hhex65: The scrolls all say on them: “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy” over and over.

  18. 18.

    Thor Heyerdahl

    September 4, 2012 at 3:29 am

    @Richard:

    Damn. It makes you want to start singing the Soviet national anthem.

    Soviet National Anthem with English and Russian lyrics, sung by the Red Army choir.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x72w_69yS1A

  19. 19.

    hhex65

    September 4, 2012 at 3:36 am

    @The prophet Nostradumbass: and Ryan is holding a cookbook entitled “To Serve Man”

  20. 20.

    Arclite

    September 4, 2012 at 3:51 am

    The Rethugs are just fucking totalitarians that masquerade under the banner of “FREEDOM!” just like Lenin used to do.

    Sorry, but this isn’t a bug, IT’S A FCKING FEATURE.

  21. 21.

    Alison

    September 4, 2012 at 3:53 am

    Sweet mother of crap. That’s…wow.

    Jeez, come on, November already.

  22. 22.

    David Koch

    September 4, 2012 at 3:54 am

    Most of the neo-cons have Trotskyite backgrounds, either directly, like Hitchens, or through their parents, like Kristol.

    So it’s not surprising that they turn to their base imagery.

  23. 23.

    Ash Can

    September 4, 2012 at 3:56 am

    I dunno about cluelessness here — given the way the American right has embraced authoritarianism, I’d bet there’s something at least subconscious going on here.

  24. 24.

    Dennis SGMM

    September 4, 2012 at 4:02 am

    (Robin Leach voice) Tongue baths of the rich and shameless!

  25. 25.

    Violet

    September 4, 2012 at 4:13 am

    Oh, God. This is hilarious. You know, Ayn Rand was strongly anti-Soviet. I don’t think she’d like this.

  26. 26.

    Yutsano

    September 4, 2012 at 4:16 am

    @Violet: She was also militantly atheist and fiercely pro-choice. Paulie Boy chooses to completely ignore that part of her philosophy.

  27. 27.

    MikeJ

    September 4, 2012 at 4:18 am

    @hhex65: I hate “Like” buttons on everything, but that was one of the few occasions I miss them.

  28. 28.

    owlbear1

    September 4, 2012 at 4:30 am

    Apparently National Review sells more copies of the issues people can easily mock.

  29. 29.

    HobbesAI

    September 4, 2012 at 4:31 am

    Reading through their list of reasons to defeat Obama, I see 23 of them are repeats.

  30. 30.

    Pinkamena Panic

    September 4, 2012 at 4:42 am

    @HobbesAI: I’d figure they were all repeats.

  31. 31.

    Sargent Pepper's Spray

    September 4, 2012 at 4:43 am

    It’s all in keeping with the Orwellian theme of the entire GOP these days. After we learned that Obama invaded Afghanistan at the Republican National Convention, it is important to remember that we have always been at war with EastAsia.

  32. 32.

    Fred

    September 4, 2012 at 4:47 am

    This is definitly the illustrators joke. I can just see him grinning through the whole project and taking roll on the floor laughing breaks. If nobody makes a stink he has a great portfolio piece. If the sh*t hits the fan he get his fifteen minutes and is beloved of “Mother Jones, “Rolling Stone”, etc. and he has a better portfolio piece.

    Art Director: Oh so YOU’RE the guy who did that one.

  33. 33.

    Narcissus

    September 4, 2012 at 4:51 am

    Didn’t you know Socialist Realism was all the rage in the Village these days

  34. 34.

    Narcissus

    September 4, 2012 at 4:57 am

    Why I hear Peggy Nooners has a Jon McNaughton over her bidet

  35. 35.

    PeakVT

    September 4, 2012 at 5:06 am

    I bet the artist knows the Soviet image and was trying to make some kind of joke. Like, ha ha ha, we stole the communists’ picture on Labor Day, that’ll show those DemoRats. If a joke wasn’t intended, then the artist was just lazy and stole the composition.

  36. 36.

    Liquid

    September 4, 2012 at 5:12 am

    To borrow the words of a young Chekov — Yo Mayo!

  37. 37.

    Sm*t Cl*de

    September 4, 2012 at 5:43 am

    It is a shame that the artist didn’t also appropriate the text at the bottom of the original, about the USSR being the “socialist nation of workers and farmers”.
    SOLIDARITY FOREVAH!

  38. 38.

    Applejinx

    September 4, 2012 at 5:52 am

    Oh, man, the Zazzle site for that CCCP poster is priceless.

    I particularly like how it looks in the Kids’ Room, and tastefully displayed over the gracefully descending Stairs :D

  39. 39.

    low-tech cyclist

    September 4, 2012 at 5:53 am

    @David Koch:

    Most of the neo-cons have Trotskyite backgrounds, either directly, like Hitchens, or through their parents, like Kristol.

    So it’s not surprising that they turn to their base imagery.

    Which reminds me, Jonah Goldberg’s dust jacket photo from his most recent book sure looks like an attempt to imitate the Trotsky look.

    At this point, I think it’s less about intellectual roots as simply pretending that they’re the real revolutionaries.

  40. 40.

    AnatoliÄ­ Lъudьvigovich Bzyp (formerly Horrendo Slapp, Jimperson Zibb, Duncan Dƶnitz, Otto Graf von Pfmidtnƶchtler-PĆ­zsmőgy, Mumphrey, et al.)

    September 4, 2012 at 5:56 am

    Good Christ, are these fucking people kidding? This is beyond belief.

    @low-tech cyclist:
    I don’t know, I think he looks more like Lenin, only with more hair. As a random aside, I once saw a guy on the train who looked like Lenin’s clone, only he had hair, too. If that guy had been bald, I swear, I would have thought Lenin had come back from the dead and was riding the R3 every day into work…

  41. 41.

    Frankensteinbeck

    September 4, 2012 at 6:01 am

    Much like @PeakVT I think this is deliberate. The artist absolutely knew what he was copying. Likely the publishers knew. The GOP has been obsessively copying liberal (they can’t tell ‘liberal’ from ‘communist’, remember) memes lately. I believe it’s motivated by grade school spite, an ‘I know you are, but what am I’ sentiment. They even structured the official themes of their convention around mocking distortions of Obama’s words. This is meant to read as copying a socialist labor-loving icon on Labor Day but altering it to praise exactly the opposite of the original. I believe they consider this deep satire.

  42. 42.

    NancyDarling

    September 4, 2012 at 6:06 am

    That cover is a joke, isn’t it? Surely it is just Driftglass pulling our leg. I am 70 miles from the nearest newsstand selling The National Review, so I can’t check it out for myself. Somebody say it ain’t so.

  43. 43.

    raven

    September 4, 2012 at 6:08 am

    @NancyDarling: Upper right corner.

  44. 44.

    NancyDarling

    September 4, 2012 at 6:14 am

    @raven: Thanks, Raven. I found this on their archive pages when I was trying to verify.

    National Review prides itself on being witty, shrewd, and splendidly written…

  45. 45.

    hep kitty

    September 4, 2012 at 6:16 am

    And so David Koch supports gay marriage. So there’s that.

  46. 46.

    maody

    September 4, 2012 at 6:19 am

    http://www.nationalreview.com/nrd/issues/314713

    while it lasts

  47. 47.

    hep kitty

    September 4, 2012 at 6:20 am

    Watching pre-convention coverage which is boring as hell but this is my coffee time and NO JOE for me. Wow, D-Wasserman-Schultz is totally dolled up and looks beautiful this morning!

  48. 48.

    hep kitty

    September 4, 2012 at 6:24 am

    You know, I can’t imagine that an artist with any knowledge of art history or the source of historic artistic memes did not know the origin of this style, which is indeed communist propaganda in nature.

    I’m just saying. I wonder if it’s meant to be tongue in cheek? I mean for readers that aren’t too stupid to just look beyond it.

  49. 49.

    Davis X. Machina

    September 4, 2012 at 6:25 am

    All power to the soviets of preachers and hedge-fund managers!

  50. 50.

    Sm*t Cl*de

    September 4, 2012 at 6:25 am

    The GOP has been obsessively copying liberal (they can’t tell ā€˜liberal’ from ā€˜communist’, remember) memes lately.

    I can imagine some mook at NR thinking “Let’s show Romney & Ryan in that 1930s WPA poster style. Inspirational! Solidarity! Shared sacrifice! Technocracy! Greatest generation!” Because one’s determined efforts to destroy the reputation of Roosevelt and the New Deal are no obstacle to wanting to piggyback on the popularity of, well, Roosevelt and the New Deal.
    And then, failing to find any WPA posters with quite the right vibe, turning to the collections of Nazi and Stalinist propaganda for inspiration. It’s all totalitarianism, innit?

  51. 51.

    hep kitty

    September 4, 2012 at 6:27 am

    I don’t understand why utterly evil people like David Koch and Dick Cheney cannot remain pure in their malevolence by opposing gay marriage. Ticks me off.

  52. 52.

    hep kitty

    September 4, 2012 at 6:28 am

    Let’s see, replace Romney with Obama, Ryan with Biden

    hmmm . . .

  53. 53.

    kay

    September 4, 2012 at 6:33 am

    The book is a ledger.
    Romney has the building plans and Ryan has the ledger.
    They’re all going to continue to pretend Paul Ryan is some kind of budget expert, although his budget obsession began January 20th, 2009.

  54. 54.

    danielx

    September 4, 2012 at 6:44 am

    Good Christ, it’s a real magazine cover. I thought this whole thing was a parody of a parody. Now I’m going to have to check my Solzhenitsyn to see exactly which apparatchiks R & R most closely resemble. Do I hear a bid for Yagoda the Chemist….

  55. 55.

    maody

    September 4, 2012 at 6:53 am

    @danielx:

    here, compare:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/bpx/sets/72057594117941491/

  56. 56.

    debbie

    September 4, 2012 at 7:01 am

    In more ways then one, their heads are not on right. Something’s wrong with the anatomy drawing.

    Also, will Glenn Beck set aside his theory that Progressives are Communists to embrace this poster?

  57. 57.

    Sister Rail Gun of Warm Humanitarianism

    September 4, 2012 at 7:07 am

    @Linkmeister:

    Can they possibly be so dumb as not to realize what it looks like?

    They probably think it looks very Rockwell.

  58. 58.

    danielx

    September 4, 2012 at 7:20 am

    @Sister Rail Gun of Warm Humanitarianism:

    George Lincoln Rockwell, maybe.

  59. 59.

    arguingwithsignposts

    September 4, 2012 at 7:20 am

    @NancyDarling:

    I found this on their archive pages when I was trying to verify.
    __
    National Review prides itself on being witty, shrewd, and splendidly written…

    Because nobody else outside the conservabubble would call it any of those things.

  60. 60.

    PeterJ

    September 4, 2012 at 7:29 am

    Why is Michael Palin the GOP nominee for President?

  61. 61.

    JGabriel

    September 4, 2012 at 7:34 am

    @Violet:

    You know, Ayn Rand was strongly anti-Soviet. I don’t think she’d like this.

    I remind you of this bit of dialogue (from memory) from Anthem.

    Bad Guy: You may not like our methods, but you admire our goals.
    __
    Randian Heroine: On the contrary. I despise your goals, but admire your methods.

    I’m paraphrasing, because I’m not about to look it up, but the gist is: Rand would like this NR cover. She loved authoritarian methods.

    .

  62. 62.

    Keith

    September 4, 2012 at 7:40 am

    Comrade Romney’s got some pretty hoss forearms for a 68 year old man.

  63. 63.

    priscianusjr

    September 4, 2012 at 7:41 am

    @Sm*t Cl*de:

    It is a shame that the artist didn’t also appropriate the text at the bottom of the original, about the USSR being the ā€œsocialist nation of workers and farmersā€.

    It really is a shame. Then we would realize that Romney represents the urban worker, holding rolled-up “plans” (actually blank), while Ryan represents the peasant, carrying a copy of Atlas Shrugged under his arm.

  64. 64.

    scav

    September 4, 2012 at 7:46 am

    Anyone else getting a little Mad magazine vibe about the heads? And they are distinctly not correctly attached to those bodies.

    Seriously, blueprints? Man is a CAD but apparently can’t handle one.

  65. 65.

    RSA

    September 4, 2012 at 7:50 am

    What kind of alternate reality is this?

    Another thing that caught my eye is the field of stars on the flag. The bottom row should have six stars, but looks to have ten or more. So the United States of Soviet America has 70 or more states? Okay…

  66. 66.

    Lojasmo

    September 4, 2012 at 8:09 am

    @Alison:

    Jeez, come on, November already.

    I want to watch Barak kick RMoney in the teeth for a couple more months. Don’t ruin my fun,

  67. 67.

    sherparick

    September 4, 2012 at 8:10 am

    @JGabriel: She might have been deeply anti-bolshevik, but Rand absorbed a great deal of the esthetics of “Socialist Realism.” She renamed it “Romantic Realism” (talk about an oxymoron there), but it was still the same ideologically driven plots, long didactic speeches as monologues, and cardboard characters who pretty much end up the same as they started, with their class enemies “dead.” (Remember the great train wreck set piece in Atlas Shrugged.) For more, on this see http://blog.beliefnet.com/roddreher/2010/02/ayn-rand-stalinist-monster.html

    Overall, American Conservative Movement absorbed as one of its prime groups in the 1950s a large number of people who had a a Radical Anti-Communism of many ex-communists and Trotskyites, who had the psychological make up for “True Believers.” That brought the same pscyhological tools and narratives to their new cause, and encouraged it to adopt the many of the same techniques and tactics of Bolshevik Communism. Hence, Republicans now have a “party line” for the day, which they flip on a dime to oppose today what they once supported yesterday. The Conservative apparatchiks and apparatus is similar to what Communist Parties organized when they had state power. They have become what they hated.

  68. 68.

    quannlace

    September 4, 2012 at 8:14 am

    Damn. It makes you want to start singing the Soviet national anthem.

    To me, it looks like something done under the WPA. You know, a government stimilus program. Where so much of the artwork created under it celebrated workers and the common man.

    Oopsie!

  69. 69.

    quannlace

    September 4, 2012 at 8:18 am

    Added:
    I’m positive that the illustrator they commisioned it from knew the historical connection. Like Eastwood, you start to wonder if people are deliberatly pranking the Republican party.

  70. 70.

    Sm*t Cl*de

    September 4, 2012 at 8:24 am

    Rand would like this NR cover. She loved authoritarian methods.

    She also hated Degenerate Art in all its expressionist and non-figurative forms, and came up with elaborate Objectivist reasons why heroic human figures in totalitarian poses were the Only True Art.

  71. 71.

    Dennis G.

    September 4, 2012 at 8:35 am

    Man o man is that a funny cover.

  72. 72.

    Misterpuff

    September 4, 2012 at 8:43 am

    689 Reasons to Defeat Obama

    (so you don’t have to mention the real reason in polite company)

  73. 73.

    stratplayer

    September 4, 2012 at 8:46 am

    OMG!! I have got to pick up a few hard copies of this future collectors’ item and get them into plastic sleeves, pronto! Whoever greenlighted this for the undeletable print edition got completely trolled by a diabolically clever illustrator. I’m in awe.

  74. 74.

    Snarki, child of Loki

    September 4, 2012 at 8:51 am

    I dunno, but that doesn’t look like all that good of a portrait of Willard.

    I’m getting more of a Michael Palin impression. Wearing a Willard hairpiece.

    But the overall composition is quite inspirational; I’m ready to go forth and smite the running-dog capitalists now.

  75. 75.

    jimmiraybob

    September 4, 2012 at 8:54 am

    Finally, art to match the propaganda.

  76. 76.

    presquevu

    September 4, 2012 at 9:07 am

    Why are Leslie Nielsen and David Strathairn on the cover?

    The lines in the forehead on the plans guy must have been modeled on the mittbot before the botox upgrade.

  77. 77.

    me

    September 4, 2012 at 9:09 am

    @Misterpuff: I’m surprised they didn’t aim for 666 reasons.

  78. 78.

    MomSense

    September 4, 2012 at 9:15 am

    HA! (a la Chris Matthews)

  79. 79.

    Another North Carolinian

    September 4, 2012 at 9:42 am

    The artist is Roberto Parada and I think he’s one of the good guys, by which I mean I think he just punked TNR. Check out his website and gallery. For example:

    http://robertoparada.com/gallery1/stewart.html

    Bravo Roberto!

  80. 80.

    Ash Can

    September 4, 2012 at 9:54 am

    @Another North Carolinian: Awesome.

  81. 81.

    nitpicker

    September 4, 2012 at 10:15 am

    This is even worse when you consider the fact Mitt Romney and his advisors still think the Soviet Union is a thing.

  82. 82.

    pat

    September 4, 2012 at 10:39 am

    OMG,go to the Parada website and click on Up in Smoke for an image of Bush the Dumber fiddling away like Nero.

  83. 83.

    Teejay

    September 4, 2012 at 10:50 am

    Is that the actual cover of The National Review? This isn’t a joke or a gag? For real?!

  84. 84.

    LanceThruster

    September 4, 2012 at 11:05 am

    I do not like the fact that R-money is depicted looking a bit like Karl Maldin. It humanizes him far too much.

  85. 85.

    Fort Geek

    September 4, 2012 at 11:06 am

    If the MittBot’s being played by Michael Palin, Granny Starver is Roddy McDowell.

  86. 86.

    Mnemosyne

    September 4, 2012 at 11:13 am

    @Frankensteinbeck:

    This is meant to read as copying a socialist labor-loving icon on Labor Day but altering it to praise exactly the opposite of the original. I believe they consider this deep satire.

    I think you’re probably right. This is the illustrated version of, “HAHAHAHAHA stupid libs! You love Communism, so we stole your Communist art and put our guys in it! How you like us now?”

    They will interpret the blank, puzzled stares they get as anger and dismay and not confusion.

  87. 87.

    Mnemosyne

    September 4, 2012 at 11:17 am

    Also, too, when we were visiting my parents a few weeks ago, my Fox-loving dad explained the whole “fascists are commies” thing for us. Apparently Mussolini was a disillusioned Communist who went out and started his own political movement when he decided that Communism was unworkable, but because he started as a Communist, that meant that Fascism had Communist roots and is just another form of Communism. Ha!

    No, I didn’t entirely follow the “logic” either, but that’s what Fox is selling to the masses as historical fact and political theory.

  88. 88.

    smintheus

    September 4, 2012 at 12:14 pm

    You need blueprints to build, and also when you’re demolishing an existing building.

  89. 89.

    Frankensteinbeck

    September 4, 2012 at 12:19 pm

    @Mnemosyne:
    And fear. Don’t forget fear.

  90. 90.

    Larkspur

    September 4, 2012 at 12:45 pm

    @Teejay: Huh. I went straight to the source, Teejay, having been, like you, somewhat gobsmacked that this would be a real true cover. This is what I got:

    This NRO Section Is Currently Offline. We should be back shortly. Thank you for your patience.

  91. 91.

    The Lodger

    September 4, 2012 at 1:32 pm

    @Narcissus: Now I want a JonMcNaughton under my bidet.

  92. 92.

    pourrie

    September 4, 2012 at 1:48 pm

    @scav:

    “Anyone else getting a little Mad magazine vibe about the heads?”

    Oh, good call. The artist actually did make illustrations for Mad magazine. http://robertoparada.com/gallery4/gorilla.html

  93. 93.

    Tehanu

    September 4, 2012 at 2:34 pm

    @danielx:
    You’re totally right with no “maybe” about it!

  94. 94.

    Barney

    September 4, 2012 at 2:40 pm

    Those are architect’s blueprints, a la Fountainhead. And, like Howard Roark, Romney is going to blow the future up if you don’t build it exactly the way he demands – and that it, after all, the GOP way for the past few years (eg in the 1990s they designed mandated health insurance; in the 2000s, Romney implements it in one state; in the 2010s, they try to sabotage it when someone else has control of it).

    Meanwhile, Ryan has a loose-leaf binder there – notice the circle at the top of the spine. This is meant to show “well-calculated economic plans”, I suppose – but, let’s face it, it means “presentation on how to kill Medicare by degrees” in his case.

    The main thing, as others have said, is that this is stuck 40 or more years in the past. It’s as if the PC (let alone Apple) never happened to these guys. It’s so anachronistic, you have to check if they’ve put 50 stars on the flag yet (and wouldn’t they like a USA in which Hawaii wasn’t a state – or Alaska, with its embarrassing half-term governor …)

  95. 95.

    mazareth

    September 4, 2012 at 2:50 pm

    The New Conservative Man — marching boldly back in time!

  96. 96.

    mazareth

    September 4, 2012 at 2:50 pm

    The New Conservative Man — marching boldly back in time!

  97. 97.

    JustRuss

    September 4, 2012 at 3:18 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    Given the recent parade of Conservative Parody Fail , I agree this was intentional.

  98. 98.

    Harry Bryan

    September 4, 2012 at 3:40 pm

    @Linkmeister:

    Yes, they can.

    There may be intelligent republicans – but I’ve never met one.

  99. 99.

    Robert Waldmann

    September 4, 2012 at 5:04 pm

    Irony indeed. Note also Dean Baker calling Federal Government purchases of stock not partial nationalization but privatization. By his definition, Lenin was the worlds number one privatizer

    “privatization proposals put forward in the 90s, including Clinton’s plan to put Social Security money in the stock market“

  100. 100.

    Lordwhorfin

    September 4, 2012 at 5:08 pm

    is most relevant. See also: Romney, Mitt plus flag.

    So is this the answer to the eternal question: ‘where’s the beef?’

  101. 101.

    Matt

    September 6, 2012 at 7:50 am

    Y’know what I don’t see in either Mitten’s or ZEGS’s hands? Anything that could actually be used to BUILD something. They’ve got plans and ledgers, and apparently it’s going to be up to “we the YOU PEOPLE” to actually do anything while they give out orders.

    Oddly accurate picture, that…

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. VOLTAGE » RED COMRADES says:
    September 4, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    […] (Via Balloon Juice.) […]

  2. Mitt Romney vs. The GOP « 2012 Presidential Election « The Smoke Filled Bunker – Where Logic Meets Politics says:
    September 4, 2012 at 3:05 pm

    […] most staunchly Conservative and aggressively anti-Socialist publications in America, published a cover of Romney and Paul Ryan drawn in the Stalinist art style common in Soviet-era propaganda. While […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • YY_Sima Qian on I’ll Never Get Used to It (Mar 29, 2023 @ 11:55pm)
  • SpaceUnit on Late Night Open Thread: Sam Bigly Fraud Bankman-Fried, Still Grinding His Grifts (Mar 29, 2023 @ 11:55pm)
  • Ruckus on I’ll Never Get Used to It (Mar 29, 2023 @ 11:46pm)
  • laura on I’ll Never Get Used to It (Mar 29, 2023 @ 11:45pm)
  • BigJimSlade on Late Night Open Thread: Sam Bigly Fraud Bankman-Fried, Still Grinding His Grifts (Mar 29, 2023 @ 11:43pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

šŸŽˆKeep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon JuiceĀ (Spoutible)
WaterGirlĀ (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14 Ā The Apocalypse
5/20 Ā Home Away from Home
5/29 Ā We’re Back, Baby
7/21 Ā Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!