I know some of you hate this stuff, but sometimes the insularity of the Villagers blows me away. Halperin:
Mitt Romney decisively loses the Tom Friedman Primary. Boston will likely say “who cares?” and “big surprise (not),” rather than asking why it happened and what the political (and potential governing) implications are.
Are there really voters who are going to change their mind based on what Tom Friedman thinks at this point in the election cycle? What could the governing implications of one negative Tom Friedman column possibly be?